One of my favorite set's of her's. Something about that picture of her checking her phone and that sexy lipstick gives you a different look.
You'll never need Viagra -- lol - lol - lol !!!
Sexy, classy, well done except for the "soft focus" effect on all the pictures. More Angelika please
The Bass has a broken neck..I can fix that..
Paromov is something different,and a genius,of courseThe Seller
youre a funny guy, there mistah...
i actually thought you were serious for a half a second there...
I ve been on vacations in Tenerife,Canary Islands.A lot of sun and sexy girls.All joy and fun.So, don't be
Too harsh on me.Im having a ball,as Freddie Mercury said.I''m serious most of the time.I swear.CheersThe Seller
Pity the photographer wasn't able to get every place on the pictures really sharp/in focus.
He should have used a more-tele lens and take more distance from the Girl. Then a lot more gets sharp.
Angelika D is one of the few I rate as a 10 on this site, so please, please, please, please, just one set with a sharp focus. That's all I ask. Just one. Please.
That'd be easy just get a different photographer.
Paramov's a joke!
I choose to call this set "Fiddlin' Around".
#89, where Angelika is checking her cellphone, great interruption.
And further: Angelika is a tiny girl. This becomes even clearer as she poses next to a big double bass.
As to Paromov's style: this is MetArt. I love naked girls with lots of personality that are photographed in bright light. However, if a photographer wants to add more to these elements, I think MetArt is the place to do it. I'd love to see more surrealism in MetArt-shoots.
I don't necessarily know about "surrealism," Victor, but I am all for imagination and audacity. Which is why Paromov is one of my favorite artists (of course it helps that his models are all so gorgeous too!) ( :
Neither Adriana F. nor Rinna A. are in this set.
Almost nothing in focus across the whole set. An utter waste of time.
Harsh Greg, but a degree of truth.
I admire artistic.
I don't admire lack of focus, or more particularly, lack of depth of foucus.
Clean and well manicured feet may be sexy. Dirty feet are not.
Otherwise Angelika D is as fine a model as my dreams might create.
Is the string intentional, or accidental, in pic #79?
If I were a retired bass, and relegated to being used as a prop, this would certainly be a nice way to go.....in the hands of an angel, such as Angelika. "Careful with my A string, honey." : )
I think the photo itself was accidental since there isn't a single part of it that is in focus.
...actually, the fact that the string is the only thing that is almost in focus implies
a) the string ~ or rather, its implied location ~ is the prime feature of the picture and
b) this was very much not accidental at all.
Angelika appears to be all about that bass. 'Bout that bass. No cello.
NOOOO! Now I'll never get that song out of my head today LOL :)
Sorry K, I couldn't pass on that opportunity. :)
It's certainly no secret that I don't care for Paromov. His weak technical skill and over the top theatrical style just don't work for me. I would love to see Angelika shot by Matiss, AC, or Koenart. She is simply stunning. However, she seems content with Paramov's style, and enjoys herself.
I'm certainly not gonna knock her choice, as she is clearly comfortable with her photographer...
Is that too much to ask???
This seems a little restrained for a Paramov set! I like Angelika, but I'm kinda missing the craziness... :-)
Paramov you either love him or loathe him.This is a magical photo shoot with a magical muse in Angelika,who looks a lot like a young Nicole Kidman .A lovely balance between the theatrics and showing off the undoubted beauty of Angelika.10 and 10 for the photographer.Met art should be applauded in having such diverse photo shoots.
You're right, Ian, Paramov is polarizing, as are some of our other photogs. I applaud the diversity. I don't always appreciate it as much (as in today, "restrained" as Rose says), but it is there for everyone.
Im sorry but image 45 is a crack up !
I know, right? I think it's awesome that Paramov encouraged Agelika to be playful and show her fun side in this set. ( :
It's been far too long since Angelika's last visit with us. By the end of the set I was very much wishing I'd been born a standing bass... ( :
Another fail from Paromov! 114 photos and the only one that could have been a good closeup is focused on a tiny spot on her pubes instead! I think this artist is afraid to do intimate shots!
I think he's just bored with that style of photography. If you pay attention to his sets, he's always taking an unconventional/original approach to posing and nude photography. He isn't after explicit, he's after novelty and originality. I'm always happy when K decides to run one of his sets, because I know I'll always enjoy something a little original. ( :
The MetArt Network uses your email address to send you more information about our products/services, events, news and offers.
You can unsubscribe at any time by using the unsubscribe link located in our emails we send you.
Email newsletters can be blocked or filtered into bulk, spam or
marketing folders. As a result, you may miss email communications
To avoid this, add our email addresses to your safe sender’s List by
adding us to your email contacts.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2019 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.