This artist sucks, chics shouldn't be taking pics of other chics, 9 times out of 10 it makes for a garbage boring photo set.
Just get use to the out of sequence stuff and enjoy the beutiful girls.
They're presenting a 'flawed product'. Why would we want to get used to it,
when it needs to be addressed and rectified. Would you get used to having your dessert served before your meal? (That may be a bad analogy, but you get my point...right?) ;o)
What a sequence!!! Dress, Bra & Panties, 100% naked, Dress, Bra & Panties, Panties, 100% naked. The order the pictures are shown is just rubbish. The photo shoot is better than rubbish - but only just. This photographer is not one of my favourites, so I was not expecting much - which was just as well.
Somebody fixed something since this set and these comments were posted... in my version of the day, she arrives dressed, strips to her bra and panties, and eventually loses those as well... just the way we like it!
Belinda is stunning as usual, but set is mediocre. Yet another set presented "out of sequence". This is very disconcerting.
Always a joy to see the sexy, sultry beautiful Belinda. Nice to see her in a dress & lingerie but even better when she gets undressed...
THE STRIPTEASE IS GOOD BUT SHE IS WAY HOTTER ALL NATURAL
Here is a tip. I like the models in all stages of dress. So if the model has clothes on at the first, I either enjoy it or I just do this really neat trick! I jump to the first photo of her nude and then go from there!! :)
I don't have a monopoly on doing this so you can do it if you like and I won't charge any royalties! :)
HTH [please forgive the all caps :)]
BY NATURAL I MEAN NUDE
HOW ABOUT NUDE, NATURALLY OR NATURALLY NUDE? OR NUDE WITHOUT CLOTHES ON BUT LOOKING SO VERY NATURAL, OH MEH? The capslock kid just kills me sometimes....LOL!
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.