Arkisi, which is usually a master of eroticism, today thought of nothing else.
The toilet is not the best place to photograph a beautiful girl.
Nice explicit set of this beautiful sexy girl. What a body.
Some great angles here - just love those delicate back lit hairs around Callista's rear...
Not to mention the arm fur... stuff drives me nuts "N V T S"
Sexy model, great photo shoot! Even her armpits look sexy!
Top class woman... irresistible...
10 and favorite for me.
Arkisi proves he can do light & shadow just as well as Ms. Schon.
Callista looks incredible. I really dig the hotrod-inspired flames on her ring fingernails.
What a wonderfully atmospheric set, given the location.
Such an odd room. A bathroom with a washing machine in it. And is that boxy, rectangular thing in the corner someone's idea of a spacesaver toilet? I can't imagine feeling very relaxed, if I had to straddle that thing to take care of business.
"Straddle" ? I wonder if it might be a bidet? One must straddle a bidet to use it properly.
I considered that, but it seems to have a single, modern flush button on top of the tank in the back.
Good observation, D_S...
One of the things I find most amazing about this set is the way in which Arkisi managed to light it without having any reflected glaring spots appear in the mirror. Small, tight spaces + photographic lighting almost always equals glaring highlights in mirrors unless very carefully setup. Well done sir!
Oh and Callista... surprised you didn't steam up the shower stall all on your own - water or not.
Must be Giant Necklace day again here at MetArt.
This set was really starting to heat up and then someone turned on the water and things kinda cooled off. But still.... Callista is red hot.
From this side, I almost always like sets with some water in them. Sometimes, as in this set, directed lighting can produce some extra-special results (frames #107 & 117-119) in sets involving water.
But you're right about Callista... I thought so when I saw her first set. She sure could steam up a shower scene.
This set is precisely the reason I like occasional sets with the model's hair pulled back. It reveals an entirely different side of Callista's appearance by redirecting our focus to her amazingly beautiful face. Just stunning. Thanks, Arkisi, this is a wonderful set. (:
I hope Callista enjoyed the good vibrations! :-)
I think that MetArt has a real problem. If the first picture is one of full nudity, then what is the encore? Another highly repetitious nude picture? It just gets boring after a while. People like “Rose” give gloving accounts, but there is a lot of variation between the models. None of them are comparable to the women who are in beauty pageants. They are attractive to some degree, but the over-the-top assessments by paid ringers such as “Rose” and “Beetle” are an insult to the members’ intelligence. We don’t need to have paid ringers to tell us what to think. We are smart enough to make up our own minds and feelings.
I actually like it if the girl starts naked. I don't feel like sets where the nudity starts on pic n° 1 are more (or less) repetitive than other sets. Repetition is the key. Even if the girl starts dressed it is quite unlikely she'll change her outfit; she'll just strip naked.
ALL the sets on MetArt are very repetitive. That is actually the nature of the game. One might say that this is not very creative (granted), but that doesn't really matter: it's all about sexual arousal. This counts as much for us as it counts for the girl. Imagine Callista doing a really complex shoot with a lot of props, sets and different stages of clothing where the narrative really matters. Might I be interested in that? Maybe, but it's not what I hope to find on MetArt.
The same thing goes for Callista. To pose nude, you don’t need an extraordinary libido and there’s a big chance Callista is not a nudist. In other words: she feels both natural and weird being naked in front of a photographer. But not only does Callista have to be naked, she has to be seductive as well. To do that you have to get yourself into a certain mood. What mood? Depends on the model, the set, the photographer, the clothes (or lack thereof)…
And so: a girl can be cute, mean, happy, angry, you name it – but she has to be both naked and seductive. To achieve this, it’s best to keep things simple. You have to imagine: an hour prior to the shoot Callista is fully clothed, probably surrounded by other fully clothed people in a totally non-sexual environment (the subway for example). She knows she will be the only naked person in front of a clothed photographer and (maybe) one or two clothed assistants. She knows she will have to spread her legs, spread her buttocks and while doing that she’ll have to keep focusing on being seductive. Imagine she would also have to worry about when to wear which clothes, different storylines, different make-up… Would it improve her performance?
No, I don’t think it would. I think she gives an amazing performance now. Repetitive, yes. But way more interesting (and far less degrading) than any beauty pageant.
I say what I think, jwb2. I don't comment on a set if I don't like it that much, so when I do comment, I'm likely to be enthusiastic (plus I am a rather enthusiastic person, and I love beautiful naked women!). However, if you read my comment, I didn't actually say anything about Callista that would merit your disapproval!
Some members like to see the girls naked from the beginning, others (including myself) like to see them clothed to start with. Our Content Manager, K, gives us a variety of both. It's not easy to keep everyone happy when they like opposing things, but she tries :-)
That said, we welcome feedback and critique from members, it's your chance to get your point across, so if there are specific things you want to see here, we are listening.
jwb2, Rose is an employee of the MA network. beetle's a member just like you and me.
It's OK for people to post glowing reviews, if the set makes them happy.
Why does it have to be more complicated than that? You almost sound a little paranoid.
Now if only someone would do a mash-up of a washing machine and a Sybian you might be able to corner the market on "coming clean" for lonely apartment dwellers. ;-)
True,but Angel did a better shower scene. You'll love it Rose. It's "Intensita"I think by Erro on MET, but I'm not sure of that, senility strikes again. You can find her as Angel N on Met and just Angel on EA. She is now retired since Erro's house on the Black Sea was confiscated.
Callista is equally beautiful, and has been a favorite a long time for her beauty and skill as a model.I thought the set to be a little dark, but that just might be my lousy vision. I have cataracts, and they are at the point they bother me but the doc says they are too soft to take out yet. I gave 10 to infinity all around, Callista for beauty and skill, and Arkisi for are. The concept was great.
OMG! That face, those tits, this pussy, this body.
Callista is a sensational erotic fireworks.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.