The climax in her book was enough to get her turned on I would not mind writing an essay and analyzing the book itself her body is full of great punctuations "she is splendid"
Probably score this movie as the most boring I have ever seen. Sorry I bothered watching really.
teasing? yes! sexy? yes! beautiful? yes! but the video is very boring, could have done better
Beautiful girl with a superb body and magnificent breasts...
Would have liked Charlene to have stripped from her daywear, continuing the effect '50 shades' was having on the drive home. A bit more mobility would also have been good - maybe this should have been a Sexart prod...but those breasts...mama mia!
Finally a video that was shot like a professional. However, the model leaves a lot to be desired - too much fake acting; no full nudity; and no full backside views. But those breasts - magnificent.
Koenart should have told Charlene that she was supposed to pose a totally nude.
she didn't take off her lingerie and panty until 60% of the video. Koenart did a very bad video.
5/10 for both.
I hate it when girls wear nail polish like that. Makes it look like she's got dirty or diseased fingernails, which is a huge turn-off.
The music in the second half sounded like the jingle from an ice cream truck. It spoiled the mood.
Much of this seemed hazy and out of focus to me. Had to tip my laptop's screen way back to get any sort of color saturation.
Disappointing all around.
How boring was that video?
Ohhh, I've been aching to see Charlene's body in motion. I would have loved to see her pull her top off over her head so we could see her beautiful, beautiful breasts drop out of it, but I'm not complaining. Love the slow motion and the long, lingering looks.
If there were a sequel to this on SexArt, I definitely would not object. :)
love the ends
Pretty much begs for a "To be continued..." at SexArt. Feels a bit unnatural that she doesn't get to do things with her fingers that are forbidden here.
Ha! I thought the exact same thing. I promise I didn't see your post before I wrote mine. :)
Koenart, please explain, I do not understand.... why, oh why, would you have Charlene keep the lingerie about her midriff for the entirety of the movie? It's nice that you had her pull it down to expose her magnificent breasts, but then you should have had her remove it. I am a huge fan of waists and navels, and I would love to have gazed longingly upon Charlene's....
Beautiful breasts ,but Charlene's eyes never opened,what a fizzer Iam sure she will be better next time.
Charlene baby is exceptionally beautiful and very very feminine... great joy to see her in a movie... Yet, considering color balance and overall layout of the movie, hard to believe directed by Koenart.
Those breasts inspire me with lovely, dirty thoughts.
But the pink panties are also inspiring.
What to focus on first, or second, or third?
What about her ass?
Those breasts are poetry in motion.
Normally, I focus on the face and body, but her breasts are mesmerizing. Can't stop staring.
Help me, Rose.
Tell me this girl is not a tease!
She's a tease in the best possible way, Aya :-)
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.