Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Hemarra Prima
Miralo Carolina Sampaio
Hemarra Prima
Miralo Carolina Sampaio

40 Members commented on Elina's gallery

v

viewer 2 years ago

What a beautiful woman!

u

unknown_commenter 2 years ago

Has MetArt officially said why the sets are shorter? If not, with all this discussion/complaining about it, why not? I for one cannot understand why anyone would say an 80 photo set could be diminished by adding 40 mor photos EVEN IF THOSE 40 PHOTOS ARE DUPLICATES OF THE LAST PHOTO. Look at and keep the ones you want. Having said that, I also cannot understand why sometimes you do see several "near duplicates." If you are going to include a picture, shouldn't it be somewhat different than what's already there? That answer to that issue is not shorter sets (let's face it, make the sets just a single picture and the problem is perfectly solved) but a smarter choice of what to include.

f

_fer_realz_ 2 years ago

Picture Lover, Rose has officially told us that MA has "relaxed" the old 120 photo set standard. The new shorter sets tend to be between 80 - 90 shots, i.e. approx 2/3 the old set.

I TOTALLY understand that some members such as yourself were complaining vocally about "overly repetitious" shots. While disagreeing that that is actually a problem, I can see why you feel this way.

The problem is this.

Some of us members such as myself, actually LIKE and ENJOY the "repetitious shots." I WANT to see nice sequences within a pose, more than only three shots, which seems to be the unofficial limit nowadays.

I LOVE going through a nice long 120 photo set and poring over every photo in a sequence, enjoying the slight but significant changes in the model's expression, her positioning of her limbs and body, the FEEL of enjoying a long, luxurious, loving look at the model in one single pose.

A member like you is free to skip as much of the "repetitious" sequence as you wish, choosing to click on only one or two, or save only one or two if you download.

On the other hand, once that sequence has been shortened to between one and three shots, members like myself who prefer the long sequences do NOT get to indulge OUR desires and enjoy the entire sequence.

I'm NOT saying you're wrong in the way you like to enjoy a photoset and I'm NOT criticizing you or the members that feel the way you do.

I am simply saying that, by indulging the wishes of members like you, MA is now contradicting the desires of members like me. When, had the old standard prevailed, you are perfectly free to pick and choose only those best shots that you prefer for yourself ~ while leaving me free to enjoy a long, lingering loving sequence of the models I love.

u

unknown_commenter 2 years ago

Outside of that , what you said that Rose said (and Rose, I have no idea what you said on the topic) does not tell us why the sets are shorter. It merely states the obvious tells us what we already know—some of the sets are shorter. My question is WHY are they shorter. Has anyone from MetArt actually said why?

R

Rose 2 years ago

Hi Picture Lover, some of the sets are shorter because they were shot and submitted to us since the rules were relaxed. We used to insist that photographers submitted a minimum number of shots. We have relaxed that rule because many members complained that this led to repetition and to shots being included that would probably not have been there if the artists had been allowed to submit a tighter edit. The artists also told us that having this strict constraint meant they were sometimes including shots they didn't like, just to make the minimum number. So, the intention is to have tighter quality control and more artistic freedom for the photographers.

f

_fer_realz_ 2 years ago

1) I agree that there were many complaints about "repetitive shots." I am not privy to the emails MA receives, but I do remember there were a lot of those complaints in comments.

My question: does "many complaints" mean "many members" making that complaint? Personally, I think it was a small but very vocal minority of members repeating that complaint over and over again.

2) I don't ever remember seeing ANY members ASKING for fewer shots in a set. They may have been asking for more varied poses and fewer repetitive shots, but "fewer repetitive shots" does not equate to "fewer shots."

3) I remember the artists always having the freedom to submit, and K publishing, sets that were in the 110 - 115 photo range. This was not frequent, but the 120 photo set standard was not set in stone, and occasionally we saw sets with fewer, and occasionally we saw sets with more, shots than 120.

In other words, those of us who are asking for full sets ~ I cannot speak for anyone but myself of course, but I think that most of us ~ are not asking for 120 photos EVERY SINGLE SET. We want the photographers to have "flexibility" and "artistic freedom" but cutting the set standard to 2/3 is going WAY over the line and ~ in my humble opinion ~ not about quality or artistic freedom at all.

R

Rose 2 years ago

You can read Jon's comment regarding this on the blog now.

f

_fer_realz_ 2 years ago

Thank you, Rose. (:

u

unknown_commenter 2 years ago

I don't think you understood a thing that I said.

f

_fer_realz_ 2 years ago

You're right, Picture Lover, I did not read your comment carefully enough and I went off half cocked. Please pardon me, and please pardon me for misrepresenting what you in fact said.

f

_fer_realz_ 2 years ago

Re-reading your comment, Picture Lover, I can see why you feel that way.

c

choseanameman 2 years ago

Not enought of her. Missing at least 40 pics.SAD!

R

RodanV 2 years ago

You've a new fan! Awesome lady!

A

Arimein 2 years ago

Elina is what I would call a simple beauty. Nothing derogatory in these words, just to say that she is beautiful and she catches the eyes. I like her nice, sweet photoshoots with Alex Lynn, and I hope to see more of her in the future :)

5

5Seadogg 2 years ago

I stand with Rose on this question as she is up to date, as I am not, and she has practical experience that I do not. Also since she is editor and head writer at My Erotica.com(a Met site) she is much more in contact with these issues.I read her site regularly, and love it. Now to Alex Lynn, who is valintely carrying on, even though Rose won't show him her aaabs. This is Elina's third set,and she still does not wear her panties around her ankle as she did in her movie "Little Silk Dress" by Alex Lynn. Here I have to say that more panty shots are needed, Elina has a beautiful figure, including bottom and ladybits and more shots are definitely needed here. I gave 10 to infinity to Elina for beauty, and the same to Alex Lynn for art.

c

chez22 2 years ago

What a gorgeous body on this young lady!!

c

cbsac11 2 years ago

As something of a newcomer to MA, I will cautiously offer the opinion that if you can't get the yin & yang of a model in 84 pictures, then you ain't gonna get it at all. I prefer the more edited, shorter sets, but respect the opinions of other members.

t

the_tdog 2 years ago

Yeah, who needs 40 more pictures of a gorgeous lady gettin' nekkid for us?

f

_fer_realz_ 2 years ago

I know, right? I mean, it's soooooo harrrrrrrrddddd wading through not only one set of 120 photos of a gorgeous naked lady, but FOUR per DAY!!!

Won't someone PLEASE think of the MEMBERS and shorten the sets to, oh, I don't know, somewhere between 5 - 25 photos? That would make it so much easier and such less torture to sign on to this horrible torture dungeon EVERY SINGLE DAY!!!

Why the heck DO I show up every day anyway? (;

C

Checkers 2 years ago

Elina looks delicious in her corset-panty combo, my goodness. And OOF, what a view in #48. Magnificent, I say!

b

beetle 2 years ago

Yes #48 is breathtaking. Absolute sexy♥♥♥

M

Marcello 2 years ago

I don't like these shorter sets!

W

Wanderer 2 years ago

Alex, thank you for continuing to eschew the ANATT route and give us some delicious unwrapping. Wonderful set, even if Fer thinks it is too short. That panty clad bottom is just awesome.

f

_fer_realz_ 2 years ago

Elina is a natural erotic poser, and her instincts work extraordinarily with Alex Lynn's and his stylist. This beautiful set would get an enthusiastic 10 from me were it a full set rather than a 2/3 attenuated set. The lingerie is a perfect compliment to her attitude, as are the lovely high heels.

Elina continues to get my personal favorite as a model and my personal 10 on her homepage. I am not rating this set which could have been so much more had it not been whittled down to 2/3 set size.

T

The Seller 2 years ago

It surely stems from the well-known photographer´s rule of thirds

More sets of our models in the MetArt Network

  • Suerte
    Elina Eternal Desire
    Suerte

    Suerte

    Released: May 23, 2018 Featuring: Elina
    • 14:25
    • 8.81
  • Blues
    Elina Eternal Desire
    Blues

    Blues

    Released: Apr 27, 2018 Featuring: Elina
    • 60
    • 8.93

18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement.

All materials © 2018 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.