Brilliant idea, take a gorgeous woman and photograph her in the dark so you can't see anything clearly!! She must be extremely shy as all her sets on the other site are "in the dark" too. It would have been nice to see her in the light.
Love this set, definitely the model and the photographer was great too. I have usually made love in dark places and I was looking at her face and not her vagina when I came. This set fits. Variety is needed at metart and is delivered.
Its Rubbish too much wanabe art, not enough porn!
What an amazing discussion. I personally like the more erotic photo sets in met, and vote accordingly, but this set is truly amazing and captivating. It is my opinion that the set is under rated. The set is provocative and Fresh is absolutely beautiful. I would love to see more of her..
Great work both model and photographer. Very "refreshing" presentation of content as well. Reminiscent of a candle lit memory.
I like that photo set even the negative critics here. Erotism is the art of suggestion and that's why I m a member on Met Art ! There are enough porno sites where you will see naked flesh exposed !
This set should have come equipped with night vision goggles.
I'm not a "pube counter" but I definitely like to be able to "see" the models. The lighting was too dim for my tastes.
There are many sets on met art that are plain crap.
Photoshop gone mad.
Amateurish at best.
And those sets rate hight, because the model, ugly as she might be, was naked from start to end in a boring, plain set without any contrasting points and 20+ closeup shots where you can say hello to her genital follicles and her unwashed anus.
Then there are sets which are well done. Lighting and framing create a certain mood. The fantasy is stimulated through set, accessoires or even costumes. The focus is spot on or maybe the set was created with one of the legendary soft focus lenses. The model looks like an actual human being, presented in a most pleasing way.
And the set is voted down, because there aren't no extrem pussy closeups.
I hate these people. I really do.
Hate is a strong word vger_man; I pity them.
Alot of "Art" but not alot of "Met" !
Fresh, wonderful promise (promise to return soon).
Natasha beautiful and sophisticated photos.
Far away from mediocrity
The low rating of this set is shameful.
Evidently the medium culture of subscribers, who vote, is not capable of understanding the Eros but only meat in Kilos.
10+ x 2.
@vger and gaetano:
Well said.maybe it's a matter of culture. I had not looked at it this wayThe Seller
Have you ever heard the saying, "beauty is in the eye of the beholder?" You need to learn & understand the meaning of subjective before insulting your fellow members en masse.
Agreed. Most of us get to see feminine beauty every single day of our lives. Only some of us get to see the intimate details. Those of us who don't ~ MA exists for us.
Waste of the model's time and mine. Sack the photographer as they are an insult to the profession.
A little artsy-fartsy for me. Great set if Stevie Wonder is looking.
I love these photo's, my imagination has gone into overdrive! I would of course love to see more of Fresh's photo's in daylight prehaps.
Beautiful model. Pity you can't see much of her due to the lighting, or lack thereof. Not all sets need to be explicit, but I feel you should at least be able to see the subject.
Soft focus and heavy handed processing leads to predictably average photos of what appears to be a very sexy and exotic lady.
Still a decent set, but this model deserves better.
very nice chiaroscuro, stunning model .
Thanks ercv for the heads up on chiaroscuro.
It's very interesting to read about what effect Natasha might be going for. Also interesting is the legion of great painters (and photographers ?) she keeps company with; or she might have developed her style entirely on her own.
What a bunch of whiny people today.
Welcome Fresh. Your face is gorgeous as is your body.
I love your boobs and pubes. A hint of what I hope is to come.
Copernicus: boobs and pubes is a great pairing in models, and in comments.
Don't be surprised if you see it pop up in the comments now and then.
As I've pointed out to another, not likely unless Fresh works with another photographer, Natasha Schon just simply never has shot explicit. This is as far as she goes...
A good thing you came to fix it,Fairy King!The Seller
Well a lively discussion for sure! As I think, as someone has pointed out, while Fresh is "Presented" here today she has sets also by Natasha Schon over on TLE. My question? If every set was the same except for the model shoot wouldn't it be boring? We normally have ~120 separate models posted a month. The level of explicitness vary. Must we be gynocologically familiar with "every" one. A comment came up again today on Deltagamma's set, Amanda, regarding the B&W and desats, trashing them as comments here attack because of lighting and failure to have the gyno exam. My stats that I have shared proof IMO that K knows her job and delivers a great "product" for us all. If K decided to include this set accept it, and show some respect for the model, the other three sets should hold you over on your need for explicit. By the way click on Natasha Schon and "view all" she began here while this was "Most Erotic Teens" and has over 160 sets posted by here. Her style has never changed for over 10 years and a few whiners are not going to cause that to change. I bet she will be here after you flee...
I like it, it is different and definitely generated some talk . Could have been a bit lighter.
I really really really like Fresh and some of the one of a kind poses that Natasha staged and presented for my enjoyment.
Natasha has been known to cast more light on her models sometimes and I would also like to see such galleries.In shadows (sometimes) or well lit (yes please), Fresh is spectacular and I can't wait for more collaborations with Natasha.
For you haters, I would not recommend that you browse the archives much farther back than just a few years.
Hatters,mad hatters!The Seller
Which is why MA changed, or we "haters" wouldn't be here!!!!!1
and the place would be much nicer...
seriously, you can have your gynocological exams every day. And on ALS you can even study the girl's cervix. So what do you complain about?
That some people actually have taste?
Must be horrible to wake up and realize that there are lots of people who are not unrefined brutes.
Personally, I like looking at girls' pussies on my favorite erotica site. I don't think this makes me an unrefined brute. I try to be respectful in my comments and sentiments.
I think it makes me normal... I like to look at those parts that are concealed in everyday life. I like to look up girls' skirts ~ not in real life, that would get me ostracized or thrown in jail ~ but here on a site where girls who need the money and some of whom enjoy the process can show off their bits for us.
Natasha is clearly underrated.Those who liked the set,don´t be lazy
But do it HIGH!
It´s a short while to catch up with Jeff Milton
Seller: Natasha is a photographer, Fresh is a model.
I suppose anything is possible, but I don't see either Natasha or Fresh "catching up" to Jeff.
Hello,friend,I know Fresh is the model,but,as you can see,there´s
no problem with the model.All negative comments go to Natasha Schon,who is,by the way,an excellent photographer in my opinion,but it appears the wind is not blowing in the right direction for her and her style.
I don´t see it either.It was an irony,no more
The deep shadows are supposed to be artistic I guess but it goes too far. Look at Arkisi who manages to do directional light but doesn't miss 80% of the model's body in the process.
Nobody but me seems to care about color balance, but yellow/green skin tones just don't do it for me.
The Art is there, but for most the model is missing.
You don't get to submit poorly lit, out of focus photographs and just call it art. Beautiful woman, horrible pictures.
As an artist myself (oil painter), I appreciate the artistic side of this site, and, historically, of this photographer. However, I pay my membership money for images I can jerk off to, and this set fails in that capacity.
A very honest comment.
MetArt - though it has 'Art' in its title - is a porn site. The difference between porn and erotica is that with porn the first purpose is to make the audience cum.
I think there is a place for erotica on Met, but a photographer should always consider whether the pictures can lead up to an orgasm or not. Though I wouldn't classify earlier pictures from Anna S made by Natasha Schon as porn, Anna S made me cum.
I find the reactions you get on your comment quite strange - to say the least. If all the members of metart who masturbate while looking at naked girls, would cancel their membership, the 'erotic' empire would no longer be.
ohh! The things I´ve done for music,the things I´ve done for art..!
Ray Davies,The Soap Opera,1975.
Try painting as you jerk off...Woooooooooowps!
You save time,the outcomes remain unchanged.The Seller
Or, how about, (would you believe) "jerking off while you paint" ? :D
what a waste of a photo shoot
Nice looking girl. I'd love to see her in a set some time.
Sorry, no appeal what so ever, worst Met Art set ever, not sexy, not erotic....
Legs -- heels -- beautiful girl -- simple but elegant wardrobe -- CLASSY !!
Everything a set should be !!!
The photos have a wonderful usage of shadow to accentuate Fresh's lovely contours. The piece opened with views of her sultry eyes, and then teased throughout in a most artful way. I look forward to more sets with Fresh, she is clearly beautiful.
Bad lighting, out of focus, too much clothing and jewelry, has no place on this site. Possible waste of a good model, but I can't say for sure as I can't see her.
In total agreement. Worst artistic BS set.
Completely agree. One of the worst sets. -100.
Didn't Like this close up photo set.
Beautiful and refreshing. I would actually like to see more sets like this, putting some art back in "Met-Art". There are plenty of anatomical sets for the guys that need to finish some business before going to work. Haven't we gone just about as far as we can go with those anyway? A little artistic competition might be good for the photographers and models.
I like how Fresh stands out like a ray of light against the dark background. The low lighting really enhances her form. This set reminds me of some of the sets from days gone by, with Monica C and Alisa A, where the soft focus and contrasting light created a unique sense of intimacy.
Very nice comment,CheckersThe Seller
Variety is the spice of life, and I think this is an interesting change of pace from the more typical sets we see. The moody lighting creates a very intimate atmosphere, which makes me want to get to know Fresh a whole lot better..
Agreed. It's nice to see a little art on Met-Art from time to time. I prefer lighting that reveals form rather than obscures it.
Can't believe it,Met is back!
I believe it's a good strategy to keep the unique features of Met Art intact.There're a bunch of dumb rednecks that believe
In their infinite ignorance,that photographers who have been many years submitting sets to Met are bad photographers
because they are trying to perform ART (that's what this page is about),not display a treatise on Anatomy for dummies.
If you wish to count the models' pubic hair follicles in your huge retina display monitors,then go to another place,inside
or outside this network.
You're actually filthy shades of what a Met Art member should be.The bad news is your money has the same value than
true members.One said this set is shit.Sure he or she knows better than anyone what is shit made of.
Filthy shades in Met
Get OutThe Seller
You're taking far too extreme an approach here, friend... we are all "true" members. This site wouldn't be successful without all of us.
I deeply disagree with some of my fellow members' opinions on what constitutes good erotica, but then, they disagree with me. Who is right? Me, just because I'm in my head, or them because they're not? It's only right that their dollar is equal with mine, because my opinion has exactly the same buying power as theirs. ( :
Some of us are more obnoxious than others (not saying any names here) and some of us are deliberately provocative, where others of us try to play the peacemaker. But you better believe that some of us "peacemakers" have skeletons in our closets that make us every bit as ugly as the openly ugly folks... and some of those ugly folks do amazingly charitable and wonderful things with their lives that totally redeem any ugly opinions they might voice just to get some extra attention on an internet forum.
All of this is fairly far afield from your points, Seller, but I'm saying it all just to restore a little perspective. Just because someone disagrees violently with you about what constitutes good erotica doesn't make them a bad person... just like you are a great person even though I disagree rather markedly with some of your opinions.
Your kind repy,cool and pondered as always would be more suitable for older days,when Met was the one and only thing to be considered,but there wasn't a forum then,and probably wasn't necessary,either.
The fact is this is a huge network now,with a wide offer of unthinkable products for the current mark in these days.
Being a network covering nearly all tastes,what's the point in sayin' we are all necessary here?
Members can be "redistributable",I mean there's no need to complain of "artsy" shoots if you know this is a site
about erotic art,with clearly stated rules that exclude given behaviours that are omnipresent in other sites belonging to the same network.
That's my point,my friend,I haven't made statements about good or bad persons;I'm not concerned nor care about it,since I know I just cannot get along well with a guy that says this is shit,moreover,don't have to
stand or tolerate it.That is a forum and I'm free to fight back that nonsense.
It's a good thing to have peacemakers.Otherwise fire extinguishers would be necessary.
YW, Seller. Keep writing your thought-provoking comments, I almost always enjoy them. ;)
I've seen countless examples on this site of photoshoots which are both "ART" and EROTIC".
Personally; I'm hear for the sets that achieve both. So thumbs down on this missed opportunity.
I visited this site in the old days; but only became an annual paying member for the last 4 or so years when MET really began to succeed daily in blending the two.
"The sets that achieve both" - I hear and agree. And I'm happy to see that blend of erotic and art slide back and forth, accepting that this entails risk, and will mean some failures.
When I first saw this artist's work many years ago it seemed that it would develop into something very worthwhile and interesting when the fundamentals of the media were mastered.
But with few exceptions, this hasn't happened. Yet. However I'm grateful MetArt provides a platform that allows for the potential.
The model is Fresh and so is Ms. Schon's camera work. This has a more high-fashion feel than the usual MA fare. It's unique, artistic, atmospheric and a nice change from the usual.
My only minor quibble is that I wish Fresh would have removed those thick, matronly, 1940's-era stockings at some point.
Such a waste of a beautiful model: has your photographer ever used a camera before? Learn to focus! Or maybe Met could hire a professional photographer. If she weren't such a beautiful model it would be no big loss. I hope next time she models for you you'll use a different photographer.
Like it or not, I'm pretty sure what we see here is what "Natasha" intended. It's not a lack of ability, just a different approach to taking nekkid pictures. (That's not always the case around here - there are plenty of examples of getting lazy with focus.)
cjmax, Ms. Schon has been around making a living as a photographer for quite a long time... I believe she qualifies as a professional photographer! LOL
Your patience knows no limitThe Seller
What truly knows no limit is my capacity to be amused.... ( ; ( : ( :
Do you want me to quit met-art? Easy, release more shit like this one
Ever stop to think this is EXACTLY the way Fresh WANTED to be presented in a first set?
Just because your expectations of an all-inclusive gynecological study didn't materialize doesn't mean that the set is "shit".
From a photographer's technical point of view, the photos are well-framed and exposed, creative with the use of light and shadow and the poses are planned to take advantage of Fresh's physical attributes working with the studio lighting.
They may not be what YOU were looking for, but they aren't "shit".
I'd counsel just a little patience, grasshopper...
3 out of 4 of the sets today were pretty explicit, were they not? And how many sets per month are not explicit at all like this one? One? Two? Three?
Out of a total of at least 120 sets per month total, three non explicit sets really isn't a bad proportion, IMO.
I believe it's too early for arithmetics,you'll have to start over again this time the vowels first.The Seller
Fresh is quite stunning & beautifully photographed.
Love to see more of this sensuous beauty please.
This is more of a fashion shoot than an erotic one. A very classy and eye pleasing one too. I like the play of shadows and the way they accent all her lovely curves. This would be very much in it's place in Esquire or Vogue but here it is too artsy and lacks the substance the members expect.
I have mixed feelings about this set. It has little actual nude content and nothing at all in the way of intimate closeups but then I knew that before I even opened the set given the artist involved. On the other hand it is artistic and aesthetically pleasing to my artistic side.
Fresh is very exotic and pleasing to the eye from what I can see but sadly we don't get to see much. I love the classic pubic triangle and would like to see more of it. Both on Fresh and on met in general. I want to see more of Fresh but with the lights on and all of her revealed.
Hard to put a rating on something you can't really see, I'm guessing this is the "arty" side of Metart. I hope so many low ratings won't deter the site or model from doing another set though
nice work, very erotic poses. sensual. probably not what many people want to see these days, but definitely a refreshing change to the "spread 'em then snap 'em" style of set that floods the web.
What a stunning girl! A very welcome addition to Met Art. I cannot wait to see her with the lights on in future sets and also to see some pussy. I don't usually like pubic hair but that little glimpse seems to show very well trimmed fine hair, that I would like to see more of.
Pab1, if you want to see "more" of Fresh, she's going to have to find another photographer to work with, Natasha Schon just doesn't get much more explicit than this set. More's the pity, she works with some of the most gorgeous models on the net...
I know. I also Like Kira W, she is gorgeous.
Tame beyond belief and photos taken during a power supply failure. A big Zero
Exactly! This is typical Natasha taking beautiful women and barely letting us get a good look at them.
That is so funny. lol
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.