I'm glad you're showing other girls too! They're all beautiful, all girls, try some girls from Africa, Asia, and South America too!
Waste of a set. Waste of an opportunity to show a lovely woman.
Which ever way you look at this gorgeous lady in all her photos she is absolutely gorgeous 10/10 she just looks so beautiful and. I will always love to see more of Aranice what red blooded man wouldn't
I see a lot of negative comments here but I disagree with most. Here is why: The set seems to be set up where she is alone and listening to music, maybe a love song. Perhaps it moved her to undress and pose as she does. As for eye contact...she's alone right? We're peering into her world here. She doesn't know we're watching in this set.
Eye contact is appropriate for models but only if the set location/theme calls for it. I think the model and photographer did a good job of keeping to a theme. The poses and model expression's depict a girl listening to a love song and being reminded of her missing lover.
Love the set, love the poses. Well done to both model and photographer.
The negative comments are not directed towards the model but rather to the photographer and the production team. The model is sexy and erotic; but the photography is hindering the model's potential. Another photographer, like Rylsky for example, could really do wonders with this model.
All photographers have their own little quirks. Some don't capture their model's prominent features well and some have trouble with lighting or go overboard with their set props.
But they should develop themes and stick with them. It helps us use our imaginations. Perception is big in erotic art because the poses are suggestive. The actual acts that we imagine happen on other sites. So a photographer should assign a theme to a set and keep it going. Let our imaginations fill in the gaps.
So with that said, I think this photographer did a good job. A few poses could be added or taken away, sure. No set is flawless, only the models are.
Great to see a beautiful black girl spreading her legs for Met-Art. Would have loved to see more photos taken from behind of her superb bare bottom.
spreading her legs for what it so u can see a grainy pussy
Loved this set, even more than the one before. I took it in as a dreamy portrait of a sensuous young woman whose inner life must be every bit as beautiful as her outward appearance, judging by the grace she exudes. Although both sets made me feel a bit uncomfortable in my privileged status as a voyeur witness to her loveliness... I did wish for more eye contact so I could feel more her invitation and sharing. Looking forward to more.
Jezebel is gorgeous, and I hope we see lots more of her.
Love this model, but have been too happy with either of photo pictorials that have been for her. The first one was better than this latest one. The headphones are a distraction to her beauty! Let's try to be a little more erotic with her....
Correction: have not been happy with either set
This girl is super hot, but this set is horrible. If a girl doesn't look at the camera (to us) it will be an awful set. She's looking the other way in all pictures. It's really frustrating. I gave a zero to the set, the model and the photographer. Sorry, She is beautiful, but this set was useless.
It is surprising to hear from someone that the model is "super hot" but that he is giving the model the minimum score.
correction: I gave a ONE to the set, ONE to the Photogragher and ONE to the model.
What a beautiful woman ... very sensual ...
Jez, what a body you have!
It would be really nice to see you in some inviting, submissive lover's poses some day.
Still, thank you for sharing your bod.
BTW, if you like those Sennheiser HD280's you will LOVE the 650's. Give them a try, you'll be pleased. The 800's? Now, that's truly epic kit, right there.
Kudos to you Chuck for a technically solid set. You handle backlighting and sidelighting very well. White balance done well too. My notion of beauty differs from yours, alas.
Some say below 'the worst set on ma' but thats not the case with me. It's a beautiful woman who only shot 2 sets yet, and yes they can improve but give it some time. 6,90 is ridiculous, I'll give it 9 but it can easily become a 10 in the future sets :)
I also have to say I dont know alot of photography, my rating is based on how much I liked the set. :)
Gorgeous girl, nice set. I, for one, enjoyed it all
What, she'll turn into a pumpkin if she looks into the camera???? Not ONE single pic!!! Totally unacceptable!!!!!
Worst set ever on met art, so many redundant photos, what a shame
I've complained about light-skinned models posing in too much light, but it takes a bit of work to make a black girl look gray. It ain't art when the model's being shot in a fog of light pollution.
Agree with Ergo that this set is a waste. Jezabel is a stunning beauty, with awesome toned body and great tits, and a very pretty face. The shots are repetitive and the lighting is terrible. She is hidden by uninteresting props. Terrible set.
Yes, it is horrible! And she is gorgeous!
Are you sure the problem with this set is not more the models posing than the photography?
Maybe for some photography buffs, they are finding some things wrong here with the photography. Not sure, I'm not a photography buff and am probably like the majority here and just like seeing a hot woman with all her beautiful curves on display. Personally, I really don't see any problem with the photography. Morning light is a very nice setting and that was captured nicely IMO. I think the model has a beautiful face and eyes and this is probably her greatest asset and she didn't look into the camera once. As to her body, there are certainly some attractive poses, but the lack of the most enticing poses is just not here.
I don't know. Is that the photographer, or the model?
From the looks of her set on Digital Desire where there are lots of great eye contact shots and great poses, it's the photographer.
Interesting comment, in that Charles Lightfoot was part of the team that shot Jezabel for DD.
Photography! There are lame duck models out there, but this girl did not pick the lame themes of these sets.
Jezabel's wistful gaze out the window is lovely, but I hope future sets feature more interaction with the photographer. She has real potential!
I agree. However I do think that Charles needs to get himself a new lighting rig if he is to do justice to (and illuminated) Jezebel's beauty. In fact, it Jezebel did not have such a stunningly beautiful face, I think this photo shoot would have been a total waste of time. The darkness hides for too much without adding anything artistically.
That is for sure.
Seems to be a test how many repetitions the members of MA can stand!
aside from the comments of a few other community members, I think this set still does a great job, showing off every angle of Jezabel's beauty. Just try not to repeat a similar pose more than 4 times and repeatedly. It's ok to do for some poses. But not multiple poses. Quality is fine, repetitiveness, a bit much
Lovely Jezabel gets a ✔ from me for the following:
large natural breasts, large wrinkled areolae, rigid nipples, nice bum when seen, puffy outer labia, prominent inner labia, clitoral hood, and the beginnings of a nice muff.
Jezebel, Charles, and K: I found lots to appreciate in this gallery. I hope we see many more collaborations from this team.
worst set i have ever seen on met art. 1/10 is a generous grade for the photographer..
K please do not give him another chance.
not so fast, it may not be perfect, but: Some people don't realize the loss of a photographer may also mean the loss of a model. Do you remember the presentation set. I personally think that shows Charles does have skills in capturing the best of Jezabel. And even the most professional photographers have their handful of mediocre photos, in a set.
All photographers need to start off with something, and though it may not be great, I can still see some well done shots in this set.
what are u saying I'm not a pro but i could take better pics of her i do know about lighting and he doesn't know about
My only quibble... keeping the bra on. IMHO, once it's not covering the breasts, there's no point in keeping it on, whether it's pulled above the breasts as we see in some sets/movies, or below them, or to the sides like this.
I disagree, it gives a sense of supporting comfort to see her breasts resting over-atop the pulled down bra. It also is a technique that helps visually define the shape of her beautiful natural breasts. I myself think that is good for a photography site, to even have slight teases. Because just having the bra on or off is too standard for any site. Met-Art is a site for creative photographers to try new angles. I'm pleased that she loves showing them off, even with a tease of just one pulled out. Sometimes I wonder how many viewers come here too also respect the creative side of the photos, than just waiting to see those few extra raw centerfolds.
I'm not talking about the tease shots, PZDR, I'm talking about the vast majority of shots where the bra remains on but both cups are pulled all the way to the side so that the breasts now ride over the structure of the bra. To me, that just doesn't make sense. It doesn't look comfortable and I highly doubt I'd see a woman wearing her bra that way, ever.
I fully agree with you that MA does and should cater to the creative impulses of its artists. I'm just complaining about one particular idea that became old really quickly and didn't belong in the rest of the set, IMHO.
Such a wasted set of a stunning Jezabel. We could have a masterpiece if Arkisi or Rylsky photographed this gorgeous girl.
Dear ergo: I completely agree. It is a wasted set.
comparing a set form a new photographer to 2 others who have been around for a longer time doesn't seem very fair. Not all photographers start out with breathtaking captures. Still Jezabel is a breathtaking beauty herself.
Try focusing on the few from this set that look the most professional, and also from the last set, which had many more good photos. I think we as the community make the poorest judges, because a lot of times we center our complaints around the worst photos we can find in a set.
afterall, each photographer stands out with their on signature styles. I think 1 core 2 more sets, and Charles may get it. Heres anotehr thing, I think Jezabel is also learning her place. Because I can tell from the photos,shes not very comfortable with knowing what to do with her poses. There is a variety. But, a good amount are repeats, with the head being turned different ways. give it time. You don't see models like Jezabel here often.
I agree with the OP. This set is the same photo repeated with poor lighting and little variety. Sure photographers aren't perfect every time and not the same level. We are paying for a premium site.
A very well thought out and reasonable comment, PaZionDreamR - it's great to have you commenting here! Charles Lightfoot is actually a quite experienced photographer with a very good pedigree. This is far from his best work, but I also find plenty to like about it. And Jezabel is terrific, so I hope we see much more of her.
As Jezebel is from the United States, is it reasonable to assume that Charles Lightfoot is also American? If so, this is a very surprising offering as, in general, American news photographers not known for their attempt at subtlety or artistic eroticism. The normal fare offered on the websites containing predominantly American based models and photographers are far more overtly sexual and blatantly exploitative – leaving absolutely nothing to the imagination or scope of fantasy. I suspect that if the lighting were far better, this would be a more interesting set of photos.
Charles Lightfoot was at one time part of the team working with the late, great J Stephen Hicks, and that's why he has such anunderstanding of the use of natural light, and also brings out the sensual, feminine side of his models. I really hope we see more from him, because he certainly has an eye for beauty.
I think you are wasting your time defending Charles, Rose. These idiots wouldn't know a decent photographer if they fell over one in the dark.
One thumb up!
You're engaging in some unfortunate generalization about American photographers, Billyboy. There are plenty of artistically talented US photographers in the "adult" business. Being "overtly sexual and blatantly exploitative" is more the fault of the sites they're working for than the photographers.
The MetArt Network uses your email address to send you more information about our products/services, events, news and offers.
You can unsubscribe at any time by using the unsubscribe link located in our emails we send you.
Email newsletters can be blocked or filtered into bulk, spam or
marketing folders. As a result, you may miss email communications
To avoid this, add our email addresses to your safe sender’s List by
adding us to your email contacts.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2019 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.