It's my job to photograph beautiful women. Yet I have to say it would be rare that I would
see such a natural beauty as Karen. Just love that face.
Nice set thanks.
Karen K is awesome. She's one of the models I look forward to seeing.
Karen is lovely as always, but this set needed better lighting.
Evidently this is "Meltdown Weekend" in the MET comment section. I never got the memo, I would have prepared. :)
Fer Realz I ran across your comment thanking me for my comment about Egon Schneider, as well as your advice that I should use that particular 'template' more and I would get more thumbs ups. The fact is, I get a lot of thumbs up for my so-called 'flammed-war' comments, as you call them, from a lot of viewers who feel as I do. I'm hoping its mainly because they enjoy my short, brief, and sometimes humorous observations that I hope they find the same. Oh yes, and the comments particular to the regular comments in the group I have labeled the 'blue pillers' (and rightfully so - you guys really hate that, don't cha); you know the guys who tend to think that their comments are the only worthwhile ones.
It is fortunate that it appears the few artists who seem to be steered by the nauseating and pompous comments you guys made are no longer doing so.
Instead, on many days it appears the artists are returning to the 'give the guys what they want philosophy,' - 'pussy and more pussy', (Oh he's such a crude brute') - a philosophy which has been the motto of MA b4 you guys started flapping your chaps; and, unfortunately, too few but unfortunately enough artists were listening to your flaccid, nauseating, and pretentious dribble.
You guys know who you are, (Hipshot, etc. etc.)! Well, the fact is I could tell from your early blow-harded statements that you were a dictatorial Machiavellian insufferable pr..ck! I simply don't like people like that, who thinks that their way is the only way and all others should follow. Your comment alone, and your thankfulness about my so-called 'constructive criticism' of Schneider is 'realz' in itself that you think that your 'its your way, or the highway' attitude is all that matters, (the comment was directed to Mr. Schneider, not to you or for your satisfaction).
Also, you know what, a few others have given me a 'few' thumbs-ups for MY viewpoint about what I thought and still think about your group of 'bp's' trying to influence artists perceptions of what viewers want to see. I think the latter is a safe thing to say when artist like DeltaG and Katherine, at one time, participated in the 'social chat media' of the comment section at an earlier point in your group 'rituals', as I perceive them. No longer seems the case, does it not FerRealz; could it be after the low 8's and high 7's they started receiving.
Maestro and Artisto never returned comments, and yet they remain incomparable., - you know who I'm referring to.Again, my point is, either close this comment section, (and I do acknowledge know this is a unusually long comment for me), -so that only viewers ratings should reflect artists' perceptions of what the clientele want. I believe that is the purpose here, and Webster defines art a 'purposeful'.
However, my latter point is becoming a mute point in itself, because the artists obviously started turning an ear to the ratings more; this site is really getting great again, ( don't know about today though); but overall, some real fresh new young faces, as well as some of the 'ageless' beauties, such as Lily and Lorena, are opening up more in their photographic expressions, and its been enjoyable.
So I like it this way and by the way FR - 'get a life.'
Hello, my very good friend hotte! I hope you are enjoying your day, from the tenor of your comment, it would seem that you are, and nothing could make me happier. I hope you encounter plenty of smiles and happy greetings today to make your life an even more pleasant experience. (:
And trust me, my friend, I am very busy as we speak "getting a life" and improving that which I have at present. But thank you for the bon mot, it is very much appreciated. (:
The really funny thing is, you and I are both fans of explicit in erotica. A pity you don't read my comments or you would know how much I harp on that subject and repeatedly ask the artists to include more explicit in their artistic endeavors. The difference between your estimable self and myself is that I don't heap scorn and sarcasm on the other members nor on the artists.
Well, I guess it really is a big world and it really does take all kinds. I have to think that living in your head must be a truly unpleasant experience, else, you wouldn't be constantly vomiting vitriol on others to make yourself feel better by comparison.
Oh well. All I can do is hope that you encounter nothing but smiles and happy greetings today as you go about your business. Hopefully tomorrow will be a sweeter day for my tortured friend. (:
Comments, critique and expressions of opinion are welcome; rudeness to other members is not. Please watch your manners.
Your point is "either close this comment section or"? Or what? You never finished the sentence but you call other comments pretentious dribble? You can carry on like this but others should shut up? And it's the others that are pretentious? Everyone has an opinion. Some will align with yours and some will be directly opposite yours. It will always be like that.
I know I've said this before, but there's just something so charmingly sweet about Karen's posing style. Her facial expressions remind me of the ladies from back in the day who were surprised and pleased at all the attention they were (deservedly) receiving.
Flawless beauty... Extremely sweet, firm and fresh... many thanks for beautiful pictures.
Most beautiful pussy lips fantastic legs sexy feet
1) Thanks to Karen and Koenart for the lovely panty shots ~ some more poses in them would have been nice, but these are very nice as is.
2) Thanks to both for the delicious explicit/erotic poses when Karen is nude, as well. Koenart, please incorporate more of these poses into more of your sets with other models more regularly... thank you!
Bad: very unimaginative poses. Apparently, Karen was super-glued to that spot on the couch.
Good: Check out her devilish look in #59. Yes.
Karen is always lovely: slender and toned, with a beautiful face. I find this set a bit mundane and unimaginative though, with mostly sitting, lying and kneeling on a beige couch with cluttered shelves behind. No doubt some members will be delighted by it, but for my taste, I've seen better sets of Karen.
The MetArt network uses your email address to send you more information about our products/services, events, news and offers.
You can unsubscribe at any time by using the unsubscribe link located in our emails we send you.
Email newsletters can be blocked or filtered into bulk, spam or
marketing folders. As a result, you may miss email communications
To avoid this, add our email addresses to your safe sender’s List by
adding us to your email contacts.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2018 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.