Lighting still a little shaded but much better.
Being a photographer myself I like good photographic work. This model is amazing.
But I don't come here for the fart. I mean art. I come for the nudes, and the nuder the better.
Love to see this model showing more of her talent instead of the photographer's.
Gorgeous model spoiled by bad photography.
I enjoy looking at Models like Kira W and Marta E but I have to admit their photo shoots are dull and uninspiring, Even on TLE Kira W is even more boring, if she were wearing a sweater in a Nuns outfit sitting on a park bench she would be more exciting.
Cropping a woman like this is a crime, Kira is beautiful from head to tow! Sigh, but then there are those inmate close-ups which are of a provocative creature the photographer wants us to know. Excellence in art and allure, and classic definition of feminine nature this portfolio is what I have grown to appreciate MA for.
Beautiful girl, Boring set.
Kira W is a beautiful young woman. Ukraine has given us another exquisite gift. I hope Kira will not be disenchanted with these comments and will come back to do more modelling for us. Perhaps
gaining experience with a variety of photographers.
A lovely sensitively shot set of this beautiful, sensuous woman,
Kira is quite lovely with a superb body and the most magnificently formed breasts and nipples imaginable
Now that is art! More like this and I will understand the "art" in MetArt
Yeap, and the "met" will again mean "most erotic teens" instead of current "most explicit teens". Unfortunatelly, I don't think this is a direction which the site is going to.
Great set start to finish. Very well done. This is art tastefully presented!
Another very nice set of the gorgeous Kira. I see the "pussy hounds" are still whining. I don't understand why some think that EVERY set has to be "explicit". As someone else said, there are thousands of sets here that are as explicit as it gets. Why denegrate a good photographer for not being among those so inclined...? After all, we're lucky to be seeing this beautiful girl AT ALL!! My ten won't make much of a dent in the lousy score this will end up with, but so be it... Some sets are more "erotic", and others are more "art"... ALS awaits those who cannot deal with that!
I also voted 10. It's impossible not to, with a girl this lovely and the great mood that Natasha created during the shoot.
I guess that some people are here for different reasons, when it comes to always wanting to see explicit shots. And that is certainly their business and none of mine. But there is way more to a woman, than just her intimate areas.....sometimes I think that some men forget about that. Just my opinion.
I would like this set if she NEVER took off that dress!! She's just incredibly beautiful!! Those dark eyes seem to look right into my soul! We are indeed lucky to see this girl here at all. A warm and heartfelt THANK YOU to Natasha and Kira!
Well said, Rachsback..........I completely agree. Kira is stunning.
This set of Kira is perfect. I agree with Methesula, this is an Erotic site and Ms. Schon is a great photographer of the erotic. She has been with Met since the beginning when it was Most Erotic Teens(so was I under another name). Every tine she is on I wish she would post more often
She has many sets published on TheLifeErotic.com also, Seadog. Have you had a chance to check it out yet?
Does she actually show her pussy on TLE?
Nope, I don't think I've seen any Natasha Schon set that was that explicit. You see about the same amount as you see in this set... which is kinda ironic in that TLE markets itself as "masturbation art." ( : All respect to her talent and vision, but Schon sticks out like a sore thumb in that environment. IMO, her work should be on EroticBeauty, not TLE. ( :
Check out Manzana W/Divina A, She does indeed shoe it all so I think the choice here is the models choice.
Lovely set, lovely model. Thank you!
Kira is one of the most gorgeous models I have seen on Met. Her facial features...her lips and dark eyes are breathtaking for sure. And certainly her body is stunning; no one could argue with that. I think Natasha does a good job of portraying Kira in a lovely and respectful way. I would have liked to have seen a few more nude shots, but perhaps we will in her next shoot.
As far as the lighting goes, I find good points and bad points. I think the lack of light definitely adds to the mood of the shoot and gives the session a more mysterious appearance. But that being the case, there are shots where it is difficult to see Kira's full features, and that is what we all hope to see.
In Natasha's favor, is the fact that she certainly knows how to turn a lovely girl into a true work of art, with her photography. Both of Kira's photo shoots are truly beautiful. I appreciate a beautiful girl, whether she is clothed or unclothed, but I agree that a few more nudes would be nice.
Kira, if you happen to read these posts, you are an absolute knockout. Great job!!
And kudos to Natasha.....it's clear that you appreciate a gorgeous woman.
waste of time, this is an erotic porn site, not a 50's men's magazine
Triple waste of time.
This is a remarkably beautiful girl. I would love to see a more revealing photo set and a really revealing and sexy movie. I know she would be wonderful.
I second that!
Even though the models are gorgeous, this is a waste of space and not what I'm paying for. If she is unwilling to shoot more provocative sets than her work doesn't belong on this site.
Just simple fact
You seem quite well provoked.
I loved the lighting, I adore the model, I thought the mood was touching. Still overall I found the set frustrating when I had to wait till phote 57 to see a stunning model topless and photo 85 to see her nude. Only to go back to covering herselft at photo 135. You have all the tools and talent that a photograher could hope for. I just wanted to see more of the model actually nude and a bit more full frontal and back shots. I don't need to see a shot two inches from her bottom too be happy mind you but a lot more full nude photos in a set.
More of more of Kira please, she's absolutely gorgeous but this isn't explicit enough for me.
Would love to see a session of Kira with a photographer who knows how to use lighting to show off the beautiful model.
Kira's two sessions have been too dark and too shadowy.
Natasha needs to go to a Photography 101 class.
I feel there is nothing wrong with Natashs's photography. In fact I think it is quite nice but 10mp is not a very up to date camera and I am curious what she is using. At any rate she is more than adequate and I think this set is very well done. After going back and looking at some of her sets with other models I am thinking that the lack of intimate shots is because of the model, not the photographer. This is a crying shame because Kira is magnificent and could skyrocket to the top if she weren't so pussy shy. This is what I find irritating. Such beauty was meant to shine like the morning sun. Not be hidden away.
I understand what you are wanting to see, but there is intrigue when beauty is draped in depth and comes forward into light. Photographer Natasha Schon is expert in letting the model play into lens.
I could not agree more. This beautiful creature needs to be seen, not imagined.
I'll sign up for any lighting class Ms. Schon wishes to teach.
Delicious and elegant.Love it.The Seller
A VERY rare agreement we have here.
I prefer this set to her first one, if only because the lighting is brighter and we can see her more easily. :)
Natasha blew me away with that first shot! but sadly it went slowly down hill from there. Kira is exquisitely beautiful but R rated photos are not what we come here for. 80+shots before she is finally naked and it's all profile shots from there. 9 pages and not a single intimate closeup front or back? Only 3 butt shots and she has her legs crossed in every one and no full frontal nudes. Your work is technically strong. The use of light and shadow is great, the colors are lovely and your focus is spot on but if you won't take that last step then IMO you don't belong here. There are enough limits placed on content by Met without the photographers imposing their own. Kira is a 10+ but this set is a 5.
Totally agree with you hipshot!
> what we come here for.
don't say 'we' if you mean 'I'
Young man, have patience. When your lust is eclipsed by love you will find yourself writing very differently. But life takes its own course in such matters. In the meantime relax, beauty will find an open heart and cause the telescope in your mind to tire of the crotch. Remember, there's a person in the body. Where lies your dream, Grasshopper? ;)
Methuselah my friend, You are FAR off the mark there. I doubt you are older than I. If so you truly are Methuselah,
I am not saying that every other shot needs to be a crotch shot merely that they are a part and parcel of Metart and should be included. Not only are they absent here but with the exception of the last shot one must assume that she actually has one because there is not a single other shot in the set that gives any credibility to that fact!
Kira is one of the most beautiful models here but she is not too good to show it to us and neither is Natasha. I can see beautiful women in sexy clothes by simply taking a walk in the local mall and breasts are readily available for view on beaches all over the world. The allure of a site like Metart and what makes me willing to part with green each month is because we get to see what we would otherwise not be allowed to see. She could have left a bikini bottom on and it would not have covered anything that we got to see here! In fact if she HAD left a sexy set of panties on it would have been a lot sexier!
Waste of time, need to see her pussy. Will go to deviant art , if I want artistic photography.
So, in your world, any photograph of La grande Bellezza cannot be artistic photography?
Same as last photo set..... Boring and not very sexy! Look at the other girls on this site and show us a little bit more. But still one of the most gorgeous girls I have ever seen.
Natascha Schon doesn't shoot explicit.
SAD! What a waste. This is not a fashion mag. This is an erotic site.
Wrong. This is an "erotic ART" site.
My dear hipshot131, methinks you mistake the meaning of 'erotic'. Perhaps in time, Grasshopper . . . ;)
I am grateful for the artful side to eroticism that MetArt defends with some resilience. There's a mass of explicit content on the web, very little of which is either erotic or artful. But I find little of either in this set also.
This artists work has always had the sense that there was a better future ahead, and the shots are now at least clearer. The determination to work in soft and natural looking light is admirable, but no points are awarded in the "Encouragement" category.
It is really sad... all the models she shoots are GORGEOUS.
I think its more than coincidence. Just as some of the girls here do hardcore elsewhere, many choose not to - would one rate them down because of that?
Many of the most beautiful would not appear here at all were it not for Natascha.
Ive seen enough pussy to be able to fill in the shadows for myself.
I admire Met for embracing a spectrum of erotic photography, respecting its models and their photographers.
Good point, unguent.
No, I would not rate them down ~ I rate NOBODY down. If I like a set or model, I rate highly ~ the set, the model and the photographer.
If I do not like a set or a model or a photographer, I simply refrain from rating, although I may post a comment explaining why I don't like something in particular.
But you are right, rating a model down just because she is "shy" is unnecessarily vindictive IMO.
unguent, you're being entirely too reasonable. You're supposed to be insulted by this kind of photo set.
It would be unfortunate if the "not enough pussy" comments were taken too seriously by MA. With four updates a day, there's plenty of room for an occasional set like this one.
And again I say "Amen!"
I agree. Kira is undoubtedly beautiful, but Natasha, you're killin' me. This is 2014, not 1964. This is my father's nude photography.
And that's a problem because...??
1964 was a good year for nude photography.... Just ASK your father. ;o)
I must be the same age as your fathers! Sadly I can attest that it was NOT a good year for nude photography and this is the point I am trying to make. In 64 I was in the Army in Germany and this was my first experience with Europe's more healthy attitude toward nudity and sexuality. Americans have always been sexually constipated and way behind European countries. It was very eye opening to a 21 year old who thought Playboy was risque because you got an occasional glimpse of pubic hair! Any publication that actually showed the public area was banned and kept under the counter and only shown to trusted customers and the stuff we see in pg movies now would have been Extreme porn. God forbid you ever saw a cock actually touch a woman! You guys are way off historically speaking!
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.