what a special beauty!!!
Fine photos of a gorgeous woman. The light is well chosen to sculpt the model, but I expected a range of camera work rather than only close-ups that chop a body to pieces. A few full length body poses in this space would show the ultimate grace of the figure. Looking forward to seeing more.
REALLY POOR PHOTOGRAPHER'S WORK. THE SET IS REPETITIVE, CLOSE UP IS OVER USED, OVER EDITED. THIS SET IS MET'S SHAME
What a waste of beauty both by the Model and the Artist... poor photography, poor erotic arts.. I have full respect to the limits of Kira, yet, unfortunately erotica does not accept limits... I also believe that modelling needs certain amount of self confidence, brevity and awareness of female beauty to be proud of... there are only two pictures (pictures 3 and 4) worth to mention... therefore, I will simply skip future pictures of Kira... if any...
If all the models in this site do not want to show their private parts in those photos, how many people will become Met-art members?
Kira as usual seems to have sparked a huge debate over what pictures should be in a set. As much as I would love to see more of Kira I do respect both her and the photographers choice not to add in more pussy exposure.
From a personal point of view any set with Kira in is a set worth seeing.
She is one of my favorite models and we do not see enough of here on MA.
Always 10/10 for Kira.
Stop name calling as you do not know either of these 2 people.
Kira is stunning and I do look forward to perhaps some more revealing shots. The photography however was waaaaaaay off the mark. Extremely poor. The focus, the light and the setting was just awful. I hope to see Kira done justice with a few much better sets.
Model = 9
Photography = 4
Totally boring poses.
Blonde or Redhead? Sensational as either I say!!!!
Natasha Schon's work usually isn't for me. But this is a terrific set, and I suspect it's what she's been reaching for all this time (though I don't think the filters and the murk were the way to get there). Kira is magnetic and slinky, and the photographs set a nicely sensual tone, slowing things down so every look and every touch counts. It relates to actual sexual experience, not some codified men's magazine view of women.
As for the non-issue of the day, yeah, it's not very explicit, and so what? It's more genuinely erotic than any number of more clinical sets. I'm not saying that I don't like explicit sets as well. But it seems to me that when there are typically four to six explicit sets every single day, complaining that a particular set doesn't spell things out has less to do with eroticism and more to do with wanting the model to put herself at the disposal of the viewer. Power, that is, not sex.
Anyway, thanks, K, for publishing this set.
The best way to enjoy the photo sets on Met Art is not to read the comments... every member thinks is a better photograph... I'm just enjoying my membership on Met Art. Of course there are photo sets and videos which are better than other ones. But what I appreciate on Met Art is the fact that it's not hard porn, but Erotic Art... and by the way I like that photo set !
The "problem" is not the model and of course NOT (!) with spreading legs !!!
The problem is that set is a very bad work from the photographer, that's all !
Very beautiful. Love the sensual teasing...thanks!
A ridiculous set of photos.
K, please give Kira another chance with another photographer.
The dumb poses and the poor photography ruined this set for me.
Give this lovely model a chance to shine by sacking the photographer. No more shoots by SCHON please.
fully agree. i usually grade her 2/10.
K, please send her home.
Hmm, nope I didn't like this set.
The use of plants was very nice.
First, Kira is truly stunning, and for that reason alone, the scores should be higher. But it's not JUST the lack of pussy shots, it's that the photography could be better. The first few frames start out promising, with dramatic warm light. Then it goes to window light, which is soft and nice, but very blue. Then there are too many shots with bad lens flare.
As for the philosophy of MetArt, what I hear is that it's gotten too explicit for the old-timers who were more concerned with artistic merit. I have subscribed to SexArt, hoping for an added erotic kick, but was expecting the same superb photography I'd gotten used to in MetArt. I was sadly mistaken, the photographic quality on SexArt was several notches below what we typically see on MetArt. Then I tried The Life Erotic, and the photography is even worse; a waste of time in my opinion. So for me, MetArt has hit a nice balance. High artistic standards, but sometimes it can get pretty explicit for the horn-dogs like me. I happen to appreciate BOTH things, and hope that the "art" purists will humor those of us who like getting off to the sexiness of these amazing women.
Red, I often find myself agreeing with you. Met does have that balance that I like, a balance of the artistic (with high quality photography) and the more explicitness of open legs and closeups.
I appreciate the beauty of the female body, and that includes all of the parts singularly and collectively. Showing an open vulva may be considered explicit (or porn to some), but to me its part of a woman, a part I want to see. I also like seeing full standing body shots that accentuate the female form. Both poses celebrate the beauty of the woman.
The thing about Met is that there is enough new material offered daily to cater to both sides - the art side and the explicit side. There are few sets I don't like and many sets I think are fabulous. It is okay to like one side more than the other, but the balance that is presented is key to the popularity of this site. K is responsible for that balance. Thank you, K.
Good points for sure, Kilroy
Spot on kilroy, my sentiments exactly.
Couldn't agree more. Thank you for the reminder to thank K, it's a tough balancing act, and you just cannot please everyone, but I agree the balance here is as good as it gets. Nice job K, keep up the good work!
Sexy, dreamy, lovely, and erotic
Kira's platinum blond hair is offset by her doe eyes. It's an unusual look, but I really like it.
Honestly, this is one of the most magnificent displays of feminine erotic photography, that I have witnessed in a long time. I really disagree with those who gave this set low scores, because Kira does not spread her legs. Come one guys.......seriously??? Kira is stunning, and if she does not want to show her vagina explicitly....then that is her right as a woman. I actually think it's rather awesome that she is protective. Let's face it....we all know what labia looks like, and sometimes we have to honor a girl's choice to keep it off the meat market. I think Natasha does a superb job of capturing the sensuality of Kira's being in this set. The one thing that I did notice is this.......while I like Kira as a blond, I sometimes think that her skin tones (given that they are lighter) appear a bit washed out with blond hair. But that's just an observation and not meant to be a negative. Kira has a stunningly gorgeous face and a body that truly captivates. And again......I think Natasha's work in this set was excellent. I love this set and now I'm gonna go look at Kira's other sets again. This set does not deserve the low scores that it is receiving. Great work Kira, and Natasha!!
There´s a hand that stirs the debate among members on the same old topics.Favorito states that "numbers show what most want to see".And he IS right.The question in why most members want to see what.
The answer is in short these people demand to see way more explicit material because they´re actually being allowed to do so.Why?
Because Met-Art managers abdicated of their own philosophy,proudly displayed at the bottom of the page.Most veteran members sure remember
those rules.The rules have changed now,which is an absurd,as Met-Art network has a broad offer of sites ranging from this to overtly pornographic.At times I also watch some porno,but I really hate to see
the essence of Met-Art subverted.
If the phylosophy don´t render the benefits it should,then change it.
That´s why numbers show and that is why nude art lovers are in minority
to beef cutting nude photography loving apemen.But they´re not to blame.
I am one of those old timers and have been a member for a very long time and I don't see a damned thing wrong with the direction that Met has gone. I for one like the intimate closeups. I don't think that every other shot need to be a gyno shot but I think that there should be such shots in every set. There is no reason why we can't have both in every set. A girl is entitled to choose how much she shows BUT IMO if a model is not willing the show her pussy then she should not be in this line of work. Metart is a porn site, granted it is a very classy one but it still is a site where guys come to get their pussy fix. If you want soft core go elsewhere.
Hip, I agreed with everything you said right down to the point where you said MetArt is porn. Although technically it may be considered as such, I don't consider it to be. Just as Met has evolved somewhat over the years, I think the common interpretation of what is porn has changed with the times.
I consider porn to be more about sex ACTS than just female nudity. When you "Watch a porno," there is sex or masturbation or similar acts. Hardcore by definition is penetration, softcore is not. As such, Met is softcore. That does not mean they are not explicit, it just means that there are no fingers, dildos or penises being inserted like on SexArt. This is consistent with Met's longstanding rules. You can be explicit without being hardcore.
My take, for what it's worth.
: the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement
: material (as books or a photograph) that depicts erotic behavior and is intended to cause sexual excitement
: the depiction of acts in a sensational manner so as to arouse a quick intense emotional reaction
Nope.this site has always been softcore.The whole network may offer porn sites,but I dont agree this is a porn site whatsoever.
This site is meant to be about fine art photography(since 1999).
This site is about nude art photography
Thank you for you replies.You are dead wrong,but at least dont hide in an ivory tower.
Not enough,but a good start.
The phrase is "softcore porn".
Visit the home page of this site. Scroll to the bottom. If M-A calls itself "softcore porn", it's softcore porn.
Don't be afraid. It's okay to enjoy "porn".
I can understand your point and agree somewhat, but it's probaply better to have both and appease all. If you don't like "beefy" or "kidney" shots just skip over those. There certainly are plenty of erotic shots to please that taste. Why force a contingent to another site just for some "philosophy" that the site started with? Let's all share here to everyone's taste. I personally don't like sandy shots so I skip those. I made a comment a few times then realized there might be some of you that enjoy that. Why should my tastes/perferences deny others. But at the end of it all we really all enjoy this site. If Met is guilty of anything it's spoiling us with beauty every day. Buon Appetito!
Well said. It has changed over the years. If I see a score around 9 now, I know we are going to see someones kidneys. :P
Very poor photography - bad posing, camera angle, color
I completely agree.
a)Get your eyes checked
b)Update or fix your spectacles,contact lenses,eyeglass or monocle.
c)Get rid of your Atari 1040.Buy a decent computer.Yes,and a good monitor,too.
c)If suffering Meriere´s vértigo,Dyschromatpopsia,cataracts or eye-related macular degeneration,look for medical advice.
d)Stop going over your old photo albums.
e)If all fails,that´s a taste issue.Bad prognosis.No cure available.
Dr.Seller.Chief Met-Art´s Ophthalmologist
Could not agree more!
The numbers show what most want to see. Just saying...
If u have such a beautiful body i dont care if her legs stay closed or not. To me this is another good set by Kira and Natasha! 9
Wonderful atmospheric, beautifully lit set of this stunning girl.
Kira is so beautiful - the body, the skin, the mouth..everything!
Great work from Natasha & Kira
Sad!!!! This should have been best set of the night. Kira is a goddess but a stuck up one sadly. This is her 3rd set and we have yet to see what Her pussy looks like. The poses were killer and the photography was nice but again Kira's legs stayed tightly closed.
Sadly a stand out set ruined by an anally retentive model. Kira could be top 10 but at this rate she won't ever make it!
"stuck up"? None of us has interacted with Kira so we have no way of knowing what her personality is. Rather than calling the model conceited or arrogant, let's instead observe that
a) Natascha Schon, the photographer, NEVER takes pussy shots in her sets
b) it is the photographer, not the model, that determines which shots get into the set presented to MA.
So, let's just call this a "pussy shy" set and leave out any judgments of the model's personality.
I'm sorry you're not able to see as much of Kira as you'd like, but if it's a matter of seeing her like this, or seeing her not at all, I'll take her like this 100% of the time.
I'd prefer a model who's comfortable with what she shows. If you peruse other adult sites out there, unfortunately, I think you'll find quite a few who aren't. And that's how a set gets "ruined."
This is where we differ. IMO if a model is not willing to do what all the other models do then she should not be here. It's her choice and she has every right to keep her legs closed but for me it's very simple. If that is her policy then she should not be here. There are tons of equally beautiful women out there who would love to have the opportunities that being a met model brings and are willing bring it all to the table! I am not saying to force anyone to do anything. I am simply saying it should be explained upfront that if you are going to be a nude model you will be expected to reveal all.
"I am simply saying it should be explained upfront that if you are going to be a nude model you will be expected to reveal all."
That's a perfectly valid point-of-view. But it's absolutely not what you said in your initial comment, in which you appeared to either be angered by her unwillingness or tried to insult her into doing what you want her to do. If you don't think she should be on the site, your anger should be aimed at management not the model.
Hipshot, when have you EVER seen a Natascha Schon set that is anything like explicit? It's Natascha Schon, not Kira, who determined the poses and shots that went in to this set.
If Met Art had't betrayed it's owm principles,then you wouldnt be here anymore.
MET has always occupied a place of its own on the erotica spectrum. Its content has always been more explicit than the bunny-rabbit site, but also less than, say, that "desire" site and its ilk. Other sites in the network are meant to compete with that niche.
To maintain MET's place on the spectrum, it's had to adjust over the years, and I think they've done a very good job with that. Is it more explicit than it used to be? Yes. Offensively so? I don't think so.
But it's still a place where sets like this, which are closer to "erotic art" than the usual, have a home, and that makes me happy.
Amazing platinum blond! Though,I have failed to find the colour of her another hair.
Blame it on Fukushima.Gamma radiation may have damaged your nervous system.Keep on tryin´
さようなら 左様ならThe Seller
I do not think this comment is acceptable.
Ian: My comment is for everyone, not just you.
I wish that all commenting members would include the name of the original posting member they are responding to. In this case the part of the comment you don't think is acceptable would also help.
As you can see these threads can get very long and convoluted! I don't know who and which comment "I do not think this comment is acceptable." is addressed to.
I think the majority of members would agree that the girls should do what they are comfortable with. What should the photographer do - insist? That is NEVER going to happen here.
I'd hate to be deprived of seeing a lovely girl like Kira just because she doesn't want to go more explicit. Maybe one day she will feel ready to show more. Maybe not. Her choice.
"Anally retentive model"
Pathetic Freudian jargon.Obsolete psychobabble.
And probably an insult to the model.She can do whatever she likes with her legs
The set was ruined not by the model,but YOU.
Sorry.Not fan of rants.Couldn´t resist.
Probably an insult? Of course it's an insult. hipshot occasionally makes stupid comments like this. A woman is "stuck up" if she doesn't show him what he wants to see. Wouldn't want to be a woman who knows him in "real life".
So she's not comfortable showing what most models here are willing to show. That doesn't make her "stuck up" or (LOL) "anally rententive", it makes her uncomfortable showing what most models here are willing to show. Taking that personally is "Sad!!!"
Stupid comments that get plenty of "thumbs up"...
As I posted today in another set,people says something and does the opposite quite often.The Seller
Move over Lady Godiva.Kira is more of a actress than an erotic model,but I thought it was terrific ,so many different facial expressions.Loved the hair,loved the look.10 to both.
The unusual and captivating beauty of Kira and the mastery of Natascha
Schon make this set a winner.
A Fantasy in White:A model with pale skin,nearly white hair,in a white
dress against a nearly white background gently flooded by the difuse
light that scatters from a window.Heaven.
An immaculate body,softly sculpted by the light.Dreamlike images and also
highly erotic power.
This is where flawless beauty meets art.
Thanks for another exquisite gem.A very special gift.10/10
Oh, that face! Shot #28 is killer. I don't care how explicit she goes, whatever Kira wants to show is fine by me :-)
No denying that Kira W has a very beautiful face. #8 is very nice but #31 was my favorite. My only complaint with this set is that I think more of the photos would have looked better if they had been presented like the cover shot. Too many of the photos were filtered or soft looking, just my opinion. Over all I liked the set; love how the dress hangs on Kira's hips and when she tucks it between her legs, now that's sexy.
Today's best set.
Kira is absolutely gorgeous, but as ever lacking in explicit poses, a glaring stand out amongst the other beauties giving their all each day.
We all know she´s free to show whatever she wants.Isn´t it?
A good thing she´s not one too many among the ones who let their bodies be displayed in a beef-cutting fashion.The Seller
I am actually glad that this set did not end as a mindless boring meat display. We got more than enough of those the last couple of days.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.