Quite refreshing to finally see a set that is artistic, not explicit, like MA used to be a few years ago. Great work
Thanks Natascha,Art is met in Met-Art
great model. photography?
What a waste of a beautiful model.
The definition of "erotic"-1.of, relating to, or tending to arouse sexual desire or excitement. Personally I'd say this gallery should be categorized more as artistic nudity than erotic. Anyway I'm going next door to see Veselin, she looks like a lot more fun!
WAY too artsy-artsy for the likes of me.
Very sexy and mysterious. It's like you'd love to get to know her but she won't let you.
IMHO This set was a total disaster!
I'm afraid many people disagree semajw
The low light and shadows in this set do an extraordinary job of emphasizing Kira's beautiful undulating body. #84, in particular, is one of the most beautiful nude photos I've ever seen. Just exquisite.
Agreed on all points... 82 got me!
Beautiful pictures from a very beautiful girl.. And Natasha Schon, Master of the feminine curves... many thanks.
Wowser! Kira is supremely beautiful,and Natasha Schon has done a perfect set, I only wish Charles Lightfoot was this good, I wouldn't be so down on him.
Beautiful, elegant and classy but as with all of Natasha's sets incomplete her girl parts are never revealed even in passing. This is art nudes and NOT erotic nudes. She obviously has a fan base and she is an excellent photographer.
If all of Ms. Schon's galleries were as nice as this one, I could easily become a fan!
Kira is undeniably a beautiful woman and has a championship calibre navel, mmm mmm mmm.
K's choice for a cover shot is nearly as nice as the spectacular one she chose from Mango's gallery Bisaya.
Thank you ladies.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed how marvelous Kira's navel looks in this set. :)
I always Check(ers) out the ladies' navels.
I believe it was Kira's last appearance where I commented something like her navel is great and Ms. Schon made it look even larger with her use of shadows.
To me, nothing gets the heart racing quite like a beautiful navel. Especially on a stomach with a little bit of softness. It's funny how that little dent in the skin, with no real function after birth, can be such a turn-on.
I don't know if I'd go so far as to say I've got a fetish for them, but man, I sure love admiring them, and have for a long, long time. Thankfully, this site provides me with are lots and lots of fine opportunities to do so. :)
Sorry Checkers, I just checked and it is Ira and her most recent gallery where I commented on Ms. Schon's use of shadows.
At least you and I can be on the lookout for future appearances of Ira and her navel, as well as Kira.
I will definitely be on the lookout for (K)Ira's future sets. :)
OK, folks, let's clear up the difference ~ there IS a difference between "erotic" and "explicit."
Personally, my dream sets are high on both counts, but with Natasha Schon, you are going to get high erotic but almost zero explicit ~ unless you regard nude and visible breasts as explicit, which I don't.
However, if you go to Natasha Schon's homepage, and examine her work throughout her career here on MA (and it's the same on TLE, trust me) you'll find she NEVER did explicit, but she's always done nude/erotic.
Since she's been doing it for years and if anything has only gotten LESS explicit over that time, no amount of complaints are going to change her mind, and no amount of complaints are going to change MA's commitment to publishing SOME of her work at least every month.
Take a deep breath, contain your disappointment ~ and believe me, I feel your frustration, because all of Natasha's models are GORGEOUS ~ and move on to an Arkisi set or a Rylsky set or another artist who DOES do explicit as well as erotic. You're only going to get erotic here, your mind will have to provide the "explicit."
Well said, -far-realz-. In complete agreement. Would just add that "erotic" and "explicit" are different, but not necessarily mutually exclusive. It all seems to boil down to what serves the function of being "erotic" for any given person; obviously, for some, "explicit" is a necessary condition. For others, not so much, even not at all. Personally, I tend to be with you on my "dream sets are high on both counts . . . "
But other factors can, for many, enhance the "erotic" functionality with equal or greater effect. This has been well-articulated by your and others' comments in this thread. In the case of Ms. Schon's work, I personally find her use of various such "other factors"--artistry, to lump them all under one big generalization--as enhancing the eroticism, and to a high degree indeed.
But these are matters of individual, personal reactions to, preferences for, et al, and not matters of objective right v. wrong, correct v. incorrect. Personal experience is, by definition, subjective, and it just Is--it is what it is. And that is virtually unique to each person. For some (myself included), Ms. Schon's work is highly "erotic"; for others, less so or even not at all. Which is fine. There's enough variety around to satisfy an equal variety of tastes.
My mind does a pretty good job of providing the explicit :-) :-) :-)
Absolutely correct Fer Realz. I can scream 'Natasha get a room' in the privacy of my own home
Tellin' it like it is, fer_.
Beautyful photo's, but more for an art gallery. For me not erotic.
A wonderful, stylish, highly erotic set of this stunning girl
The use of light to accentuate the undulations of Kira's beautiful body is quite superb!
Love the set, love Kira x
A visually stunning and flawless set, albeit, semi erotic but I still love it .
A lovely model, with a fantastic body.
Is there any reason to photograph her in a dark room where you can barely see the model in many of the photos?
MetArt is supposed to capture the beauty and eroticism of the model.
Many of these photos disguise the model instead, by hiding her in darkness.
Kira is Natasha Schon's muse, a stunning beauty with a flawless body. Puts the 'art' in MetArt! :-)
got it in one Rose
You are quite right English Rose .This is Met ART at it's finest.Sensational model,sensational photography.
hit the nail on the head, Ian
The thing I appreciate the most about Ms. Schon's light & shadow style, is the way she uses it to accentuate the curves and planes of her models' bodies.
I'm also quite taken with the close-up portrait series #66-71.
A slim and sporty girl! Kira is gorgeous. The cute face with blond hair, beguiling big round brown eyes, a body with well shaped firm tits and a nice ass. A really pretty girl.
Natasha Schon only works with attractive girls beetle
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.