Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Rodina Milena D
Deviso Milla
Rodina Milena D
Deviso Milla

51 Members commented on Lilit A's gallery

A

ABNRanger 2 years ago

What a perfect ass!

J

JANN 3 years ago

Why all the time so Hazy /unclear frustrating !!!!

A

AA11 3 years ago

OMG!!!!!
WHAT A PURE EROTIC BEAUTY
LOVE THE REVEALING PUSSY LIPS AND DETAILS
JUST MARVELOUS
NEED VIDEOS !!! LOTS AND LOTS AND LOTS AND LOTS OF PHOTOS
JUST ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING
PLEASE!!!!
SHE WILL FOR SURE KEEP ME A MEMBER!!!!
OOOOOOOHHHHHHHHH.....

The White and yummie in her pussy is the best I see on a girl so far. I can not stop dreaming of her and her panties if I heve them here. Best actress and best photographer, Lilit is totally relaxed and looks genuine in all ways possible.

f

_fer_realz_ 3 years ago

Lilit fans will be interested to know that Arkisi just posted his second set of her on his site EternalDesire.com today (6/6) ...and it is a good set. ( :

B

Benjy 3 years ago

Reminds me of a modern-day Audrey Hepburn, only dirtier.

f

freddy 3 years ago

… and on the eighth day (after a nice rest) God created Lilit . Amen .

T

Thanks Your Bod 3 years ago

2048 GMT 05 June 2015 ... 54,596 views ?!?

WOW.

C

CLASS4U 3 years ago

Beautiful Stunning Woman πŸ’‹ ..... And such an Angelic Photogenic Face !!..... I could look into her eyes all day and be happy 😐 ..... Glorious body and skin !!.... I agree with many of the comments regarding dof shots and loss of focus .... But.... We are spoiled by Metart because 90% of the time the photography is High Quality , that's why we chose this Site after all !!..... As a Natural Pussy lover ... I would luv to see s set with Lilit un-shaven which would add that touch of Womanhood to her sexuality !! πŸ˜‰

J

Jupiter 3 years ago

another awesome set !! I feel like Lilit might become a super star here, and of course, Arkisi was perfect too, so , guy ,keep going to work with Lilit !
Spasibo !

C

Cheburashka71 3 years ago

Keep up with this kind of quality work Arkisi and you may make me a believer yet. Dobre.

A

Arkisi 3 years ago

Π”ΡΠΊΡƒΡŽ!

l

lore 3 years ago

This Girl its WOW, Face and Body, The Navel of her is verry horny.

f

face n butt 3 years ago

YES! so cute with her tongue out, not to mention butt open! =P

R

Rocky46 3 years ago

Lovely Lilit is back... She is a precision cut jewel... beautiful and elegant... though I have a feeling that she is treated roughly... :)))

B

Billyboy 3 years ago

Good to see the rating for this photo shoot rising from a ridiculously low 8.3 this morning to a far more realistic 9.09. In my personal opinion it's a 10+.

W

Wilsonface 3 years ago

The camera may love Lilit, but not as much as me. Wow, how sexy can a woman get? Lilit takes us to anew level.

H

Horsethief 3 years ago

Lilit is a perfect in every way, and this is her most explicit set so far. It is not my favorite however. Somehow, there is a bit too much of a "just fucked" look about it. I prefer her second set over this one. But...I pick nits.

m

metlover 3 years ago

Extremely hot set of pictures, perfect for an ass lover like me, she is super cute and I love her uninhibited posing

s

spunky 3 years ago

If I were not a life time member, I would get Lilit's sets any time by paying "individual set to down load feature" that now MA has. She is Godess, SUPERSTAR, best of the best, ten plus etc... Love to see many more of her sets to come...

R

Rusty Shackleford 3 years agoLifetime member

I can't decide which set of Lilit is the best. She's so cute, sensual, and has fun in each of them. A video interview with her would be fantastic.

C

Checkers 3 years ago

Lilit looks as stunning as always. With her slender shape and seductive posing style, it's pretty easy to see why she's becoming a star around here. But I especially love #21, where it looks like she and Arkisi shared a giggle when her clothes came completely off. It's unguarded and candid, and charming as all get out.

C

Checkers 3 years ago

Over 130 shots in all four sets today. A bonus! :)

k

kilroy 3 years ago

a bonus and a boner

s

stardust 3 years ago

Sensational young lady great set from superstar Lilit A. More please.

0

0128tdln 3 years ago

That Face!!!!

D

Dark_Storm 3 years ago

Lilit's got the perfect navel for doing body shots. Of course, I wouldn't stop at just the navel. ;-)

D

Dark_Storm 3 years ago

#89 - Lilit's opened wide and I say "AHHHHHH!"

P

Pab1 3 years ago

Third set from Lilit and getting better each time. I agree with the comments below regarding this little beauty. 10/10 for Lilit of course.

However....I have an observation to make regarding the photography and it is not just this set I have seen it on.
Is the out of focus done on purpose? If so for what purpose because all I see is out of focus parts that I would like to see in this shot as well as the next.

Depth of field??? Never been a problem for me to take pictures of people in focus.

O

OohLaLa 3 years ago

Yes, it is depth of field. The closer the lens is to the model, the narrower the DOF. That's why sometimes the photographer will take a shot of the models face and it will be in focus and her pussy will not. Then he will change the focal plane and the parts in and out of focus will be reversed. That technique is used in this set and many others when the shots are taken from the same distance from the model.

The lenses used (whether prime or zoom) also come into play but I won't get into all of that.

P

Pab1 3 years ago

I obviously know what depth of field is as I have been a photographer for 42 years, what I am saying is that it can be overcome and you wouldn't have shots of naked parts out of focus.

Take shots 126 and 127 for example:
126 is focused on the vagina and is 100% clear with the face out of focus. 127 is just a close up of vagina and butt and is out of focus!!!! Either there is a problem with the camera or if using manual focus, a problem with the photographers eyes.

I don't know about anyone else but I do not pay an annual subscription to view half sets of photographs out of focus. If I wanted that I would take my glasses off.

R

RedPilot 3 years ago

Right, it's a frustrating shot to be sure. So much potential, not a good outcome. There is a finger at the top in focus, then it looks pretty sharp inbetween her vagina and her anus. Maybe Arkisi was hoping if he split the difference, the DOF would bring both into focus, but at these distances, he'd need f/32 to pull that off, and I'm pretty sure he was nowhere near f/32.

R

Rocky46 3 years ago

I noticed the same... however, I was thinking that Artist was in Close Up mode to catch all details on the focal plane where no more DOF left.

O

OohLaLa 3 years ago

I misinterpreted your question. Sorry.

I see what you mean. #126 is good while #127 has the focal point sharp on her fingertips, not her vagina. This is pretty common in these photo sets. I'm assuming these are shot with manual focus as it would be too hard to isolate the body part you want in focus at such close range with the auto mode. Maybe the photographers eyes are getting older, just like I am.

A

Arkie2 3 years ago

Don't forget, in this new age of digital photography, "auto-focus" lenses have a very wide variety in their auto-focus metering modes and, what works for one frame, doesn't necessarily work for every shot a photographer composes. Short of setting the camera for "manual focus" and doing each shot frame-by-frame, you'll always have a camera's auto-focus lens "hunting" back and forth to find what IT thinks the plane of sharpest focus should be for each shot. Digital shooting CAN be fun, but if you let the camera make too many choices for you (the photographer) you're at the mercy of the equipment.

b

bibblefuss 3 years ago

"...I do not pay an annual subscription to view half sets of photographs out of focus."

Actually, you do. And you have since whenever you signed on as a member. Like it or not, it's been part of the official style for quite awhile. It happens a lot so I'm 100% sure it's not an error, it's by choice. I don't understand why they don't mix in more images where more than one body part is in focus at the same time.

It's strange, but unlike other issues brought up in the comments, nobody from MA ever responds to comments about this.

R

Rose 3 years ago

I don't feel qualified to respond from a technical point of view, bibblefuss, and I don't want to speak for K regarding this. What I can tell you is that she talks to the photographers and gives them feedback constantly, but obviously she has to respect that they all have their signature style and shoot in a particular way. You can see from the ones that comment regularly here that many are very keen to hear critique, they want to learn from it and improve. It's also worth noting that the photosets on MetArt are pretty long. You get a big variety of shots to choose from, which may have been selected for various reasons - for example one may not be technically perfect, but gives you something different to other shots. I think K does a pretty amazing job!

b

bibblefuss 3 years ago

Thanks for the reply, Rose. Personally, I don't think there are too many "out of focus" - but the "in focus" (achieved via deeper DOF or a slight change in camera angle) images that would logically be part of a series of photos aren't included as frequently as they should be.

The super-short depth-of-field is so ubiquitous that I just assumed it was a requirement.

R

Rose 3 years ago

Definitely not a requirement - I don't think K stipulates specific shots or techniques at all. The only requirement is that the girl looks good – everything else is up to the artistic vision of the photographer, although obviously K gives feedback on their work.

S

Sapphiramazed 3 years ago

I thought there were too many out of focus photos also. Some would have been absolutely perfect were they not half out of focus. Great set, but I couldn't rate it a 10 because too many gems were tarnished. I'm usually very pleased with Arkisi's sets. I'm pleased with this set, but not as much as I have been of others, because I felt too many photos came sort of the perfection that was right there to be captured.

c

christoph 3 years ago

I agree; its very frustrating to see the perfect shot ruined by super-shallow DOF.
It's not "artsy" its just "out of focus".
I also thought the contrast was a bit high.

R

RedPilot 3 years ago

Arkisi does have a dramatic lighting style, which is to say more directional than most photographers. Result is that there are often deep shadows, and sometimes precisely what you want to see is relatively unlit. In general, I like his style, but from time to time it's too much. As you noted, christoph, the set is very high contrast.

Arkisi DOES get that many of us really do love the explicit "open" shots, and he is doing more and more of that. See Eternal Desire, some of the sets are off the charts!

S

Sapphiramazed 3 years ago

"short" not "sort"

b

bikeman 4 3 years ago

What an amazing, explicit set of this beautiful sexy young babe.

Had to go and lie in a darkened room after seeing these, in the hope my heart rate would slow down a bit!

10/10 to Lilit & Mr A

M

MetArtisMyLife 3 years ago

I love how Lilit just knows what were are after and doesn't hold back. Some of the shots make her pussy litearlly look like candy. Soft & sweet.

N

Nightingale 3 years ago

The superstar champ is back.What a knockout!The face of a angel combined with a Wicked and Evil looking pussy.

R

Rose 3 years ago

Our newest superstar Lilit makes another welcome appearance... it's easy to see why everyone has fallen for her. She's a little more waif-like than the girls I usually go for, but something about her is so incredibly cute and appealing - maybe it's that gorgeous smile that has me hooked!

B

Billyboy 3 years ago

At 5'9" tall, there is absolutely no doubt that, even though she might have a bit of a waif-like look, this tall and elegant beauty is anything other than 100 percent real woman! 10+++++

w

will121 3 years ago

Wow, what a stunningly raunchy set, fabulous. If only more sets were like this!

More sets of our models in the MetArt Network

18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement.

All materials © 2018 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.