more of her please but next time by rylsky, not by albert varin or catherine
they are boring.
Great set - Lucy has a wonderful body & the most magnificent muscular buttocks and thighs - so very sexy!
Thank you Lucy for many hours of boner-stroking good times!
Ummm, I like her naked all the time. What is wrong with naked? Hello!
Dude, you're missing the point, I think...
There's NOTHING wrong with naked! If I thought there was something wrong with naked, I wouldn't keep giving this site my money! LOL
Nothing wrong with naked... except, when there's no tease, no fun getting TO naked. Just like in real life... many girls like to buy fancy and sexy lingerie and tease their boyfriends/girlfriends with it BEFORE getting naked. I fully agree with that frame of mind and when I see a set shot in that mode, it makes me happy.
Naked is GREAT! I just like a little tease, a little fun GETTING there. ( :
This is a girl that would look good in anything and nothing.
Fabulous picture set from a very lovely young lady enjoy.
Beautiful woman with an amazing ass and great strong legs! I’m a fan of her! The photography stuff isn’t bad either.
Whats with the fuzzy out of focus images? Smart phones takes clearer pictures.
There´s someone who says it´s 10 masterpiece.Go figure.
Yeah!The running man who wears a funnel on top of his head,giggling.
Barf humbug! ( ;
Beautiful girl, love all those spoon poses showing off her amazing ass
All naked all the time is fine. It is great, if the photos flatter the model. There are not very many good ones here. Many are shot too close, the light is poor, and the poses are repetitious. And her hair is in the way in some shots.
I agree Gary. I would much prefer fewer shots in a collection (certainly no redundancy shots as seen in this set) in favor of a variety of poses/sets in high quality. I think every collection should somehow incorporate a 360 degree view of the model too which many certainly in the past didn't (seems to be much better in recent years though). I think there are quite a few models who received poor reviews (unfairly) because the photographer failed at their jobs.
Best set from Varin in a while! Doggie and spoon poses are incredible! Perfect 10 masterpiece! Some dorkie comments by the p/c concerning this set! Barf! Barf, I say!
I am a proud member of the prick clique, and I heartily approve of your reaction to my comment. ( :
Oh by the way, have a really nice day, hotte! I hope a whole lot of complete strangers smile at you... ( :
All his buddies at the loony bin will sneer at him,you know,"One flew over the cuckoo´s nest" :)
T.S (not Eliot)
Dammit, now I gotta guess AGAIN at your last name. What gives?!? LOL
Lucy looks good, but that painting of the waves behind her is simply amazing. It's extremely difficult to make water look so lifelike.
Damn, I can't seem to get a good look at the painting, there's a gorgeous nude woman with lucious lady parts distracting me. I take your word for it.
I would take the first option :)
Lucy is absolutely gorgeous, more, more, more!.
All naked all the time,no tease,Ron Offline.Bad,Request less.
I see what you did there. Very clever. :)
Seller, your coffee must be bitter this morning. I'm not saying I disagree with you, in fact I do like to see some strip, just as fer_realz and many others do. I call this NTS - Nude to Start, and it is odd that all three photosets are that way today, adding to the frustration, no doubt. Hopefully tomorrow will be better.
BTW, Lucy has been shot by Ron Offlin in the past, today it is Albert Varin.
I know,I know,my friend Kilroy,that´s what I say Ron "Offline",meaning-more or less-that Ron isn´t the photographer
in this occasion.
I heartedly thank you for your kindness.My coffee is ok,and,when things aren´t the way I like,or the way I believe things should be,I make bitter comments.
Besides being a member of the "prick clique",as the well known fool says,I enjoy a good sense of humour,some Irony and good faceless friends as you.Thank you
Seller, I often appreciate your humor, just a little slow sometimes.
Oh, and I'd rather be in the prick clique than be a hotte head.
I see what you did there, points to you, good sir!
Seller, it occurs to me that, given who named us thus, being part of the prick clique ain't a bad thing a'tall!
It´s a honour,Sir!!
This set only confirms my feeling that the "all naked all the time" sets just don't have as much soul as the ones where the models start in a costume of some sort and give us a tease.
This is not the fault of Lucy, who gives us some really nice poses, and I don't think it's the fault of Varin, I think it's just an inherent problem with all naked all the time sets. When you don't even have a zero to sixty, but start at sixty from the get go, there's nowhere to go from there.
I'm definitely looking forward to more Lucy, and more Varin, whose sets generally have a lot more soul and zing and genuine erotic artistry to them than this one does.
I was telling you (below).Very nice and much appreciated stellar fer_realz
With age comes wisdom
Hit the nail in the head this time,tough I´m the exception that confirms the rule!
Teasers are ESSENTIAL - I would even go so far as suggesting that sets should contain 33% teasers to the full-on nude shots but these teasers MUST be provocative in some manor (or don't include it). Thanks for your views _fer_realz_!
Yeah! 360 degrees view,33% tease,18% tits,24,3% butt,24,7% relative humidity,and a pinch o´salt´n´pepper.
The Cook on call
You're saying something here, bro, but I just can't quite tease it out... ( ;
(p.s. I really DID snarf my coffee out my nose this time!)
I like the nude from the beginning sets, the outdoor sets, etc, I like the variety. Better imo than having the repetitious cookie-cutter strip tease indoor sets all the time......
I agree, variety is the key. There's a well-known erotica site that "only" features indoor striptease sets, and it gets pretty dull and repetitive.
Like you, I prefer sets where the models start off in some manner of clothing, as opposed to ANATT. But I wonder how often it comes down to the photo selection process.
I figure that photographers probably take 300, maybe 400 or more, photos in a session, and discard the majority when they whittle it down to the 120-ish they send to MET. Maybe the model started off clothed in some manner, but it didn't look as good as hoped? Maybe the model took a while to warm up, and the clothes were already off at that point?
I have no idea how often this happens. 5 percent of the time? 40? 60? Or maybe I'm just speculating.
Interesting points, Checkers, thanks for bringing them up. ( :
Like you, I have no idea.
I do know that some photogs submit ANATT sets more frequently than others... some appear to (IMO) specialize in them. In fact, one of my few criticisms of Rylsky is that he's gone from fun lingerie and clothing tease sets to almost exclusively ANATT. As a matter of fact, the venerated Erro seems to have followed the same trajectory over his career... peruse his site and his older sets had a lot more clothing and lingerie teases, but over time he submitted almost exclusively ANATT sets.
They move with the times.Consider the fact that good taste is loosing the battle nowadays.Rylsky and others have left their fine
style in favor of a blatantly gross,primary-I´d say-production.That´s what I hold against them.But,as Ray Davies said,they only give the people what they want.
Winston Churchill used to talk about the many ways so express the same concept.Here is a nice and tactful stellar Fer_realz comment.
Above,you can see just the opposite!
I love Lucy Kent! She seems playful and fun. Absolutely superb strong legs and one of the best asses ever seen on Met-Art.
I welcome her return to Albert Varin's lens too, after the glaring brightness of her last three sets. This opulent setting and lighting seems to compliment her curves perfectly.
*Her last FOUR sets, by Offlin - never mind me, I can't count.
hell yea, butt naked from the start showing that beautiiful ass!
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2018 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.