I liked her.
I still do!.
An enchanting beauty, Tastefully presented but the backdrop is really weird and a bit distracting! Other than that I find this set quite pleasing. Somewhat subdued but that fits this models style and quite elegance. A lovely body with everything in perfect harmony and a perfect pussy in my view. There is a subdued elegance to Maryana that says class and emits a simmering sexuality that I find most interesting and scintillating.
I find the photography to be a bit flat but totally acceptable. It could use a bit of contrast but I'm not complaining. At least there are many well focused shot of her intimates and some nice facials.
I gave this a 10+
Maryana is stunningly beautiful, gorgeously intimate poses showing her in full and breathtaking, womanly glory, lots more of this lovely girl!.
VERY nice!! Maryana has a quality all her own. And I LIKE IT!! Maybe not her "best" set, but very nice! Well worth keeping!!
Maryana has an exquisite face. Just gorgeous.
Absolutely!! Very "kissable"!! XXXXXXXXXXXX ;o)
Boring set, BAD Monday
That depends on your "POV" tricky. Myself...I'm pretty happy with the line-up today.
"Extremely bad" just like your comment! Do us a favor and have a swim in the "Cry'me'a River"...;o)
Maryana has an ethereal, almost elfin quality to her delicate and exquisite beauty.
And if she hasn't already been nominated, I hereby nominate her to the PP Club.
Definitely accepted in the PP club!
And several pix added to my PP directory!
That girl juice looks quite lovely as well... yummmmm!
I have to agree with you on the "Elfin" look... I've often wondered what an Elfin pussy looks like...LOL I LIKEY!!!! YUM YUM!! (Not in MY "PP" club however...) ;o)
Maryana : FABENE by Alex Iskan
Again, a gorgeous model and very poor photography. I refer to photo 13-14, as sample. closeup to her face and breasts. The photo is neither clear nor sharp. I can see Maryana has nipples, but I cannot see the nipples clearly. Lighting is good. Contrast is very bad and focus is extremely bad. This is not what I expect from Met Art. Is Met Art, now reverted to fourth class photographers?? This is not the quality we are used to. Did K our content manager see this set??
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2016 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.