Only one word suffices.
Such a shame she felt the need to paint graffiti on that perfect canvas.
I happen to like Mia's tatoo, and wish it was featured from time to time. It is unique and very artistic. Besides, having or not having a tatoo is a personal choice and no one elses business. It's like the controversy about pubic hair. It is no one's business if a girl shaves or not. Accept what you see, it is not your business. Mia Sollis is one of the most beautiful women I have seen. I have never seen a bad set featuring her. Yes, I would actually like to see some sets where her artistic tatoo is shown.
Beautiful photo set! Thank you, I needed that.
Mía: Your pretty thight Lovely pussy is the best one in the whole Met Art web. Besides your firm little tits and beautiful face makes you one of my five TOP models of all time in Met Art.
Again A great set of Mia one of MetArt's best models, I've read a lot of comments about her Tatoo that is rarely ever seen, when there are models on MetArt that have moles, scars, piercing holes and a variety of other flaws, I think I can leave Mia alone about her's, while I hate Tattooing in general I don't think Mia's takes from her Beauty at all.
Sweet, gorgeous Mia!!! Ohh, do I love those freckles!!! And everything else about her too!!!
Always completely amazing, Mia is fantastic, sublimely beautiful poses as ever, a real treat once more and more to come I hope, mesmerising!.
What a lovely woman! I love everything about her. From her red hair to her gorgeous body and yeah even her tattoo (altough they dont show us) :). I see some people thinks the photography isnt good but since i dont know anything about that for me this set is just a 10+.
I love the relaxed, comfortable feel of this set. The shirt and panties combo at the beginning is such a casual outfit to start off with, and Mia's easygoing composure takes care of things from there. It's easy to see why she's considered a favorite around here.
I choked on coffee while reading your comments, but you obviously objectively than I ....
but you must agree ------ the model is awesome))
Well done set. #71 goes into the Met-Art Hall of Fame.
Mia is awesome, and so is this set! Thanks for saying hi, Koenart!
Without writing a book - Geezz she is so beautiful.
My first impression? Sometimes less is more.
When you have a model as beautiful as Mia there is little need to resort to flash and dash or avant-garde, just keep her comfortable, click the shutter, and don't screw up in the post photography editing. I will need to review more closely to see if Koenart delivered her part of the bargain, Mia did her part.
Thank you ladies for this collaboration.
I am crazy about Mia, and shot #18 is a perfect example of what I love about her. Gorgeous face (those freckles!), great body, terrific poses, but most of all she seems to have such an intimate connection with the camera that you feel like you know exactly what she's thinking! One of my all-time faves :-)
Mmmmmhmmmm those lovely freckles... that lovely, knowing, sometimes enigmatic smile, as if she's trying to decide whether or not to share her secrets with us, or whether we're just too silly to even bother.... ( ;
Koenart's very first film of Mia Sollis and her very first film with Miela are among my "gold standard" MA films. IMO, this set lives up to that standard. Mia's beauty is seemingly eternal and we are truly privileged to witness it so often here on MA.
I have posted so much about Mia, before, I will not bore you all with repetition, I had hoped that after her last set Dagomand and K being mice enough to respond about the Tat and explaing that it was an exception. I had hoped that we would see more of Mia's IMO spectacular ass. You do not have to display the art work on her upper back but their are ways to shoot from rear without doing that. Koenart you introduced Mia to us in the fall of 2O11 and have had your sets of her posted a total of ~30 times across the family. It was I think one of your casuals that I first become aware of the Tat. No you do not have to feature it, but you should be able to figure out a way, shall we say, around it. Thus I am a little disappointed in, not Mia, but you for not being more creative.
I am definitely working on this, its partially my fault. At one time there was a rule, "no tattoos", photographers are privy to this and work accordingly. I have to be honest, I never liked the tattoos on beautiful women. However, I am letting our contributors know that we can work around this, getting the shots that our members desire without the tattoo being the focus (but leaving out the photoshop). Koenart is just following what the previous MA rules required.
K I know you are and the reduction of photoshopping has definitely been an excellent move I assume you realize my disappointment had nothing to do with you! If you are an "Artist" then he or she should give to you creative options to allow you to develop new guidelines of acceptability. And let me thank you for posting Fresh why does "every' set "have" to include gyno shots. And a good number of that set were Gallery qualified, and I am still mad about how our members treated her, she was beautiful and deserved better and you saw it and I know anticipated the storm but went for it, BRAVO!
K, it was my impression that this set is probably one of Mia's older ones, probably shot during the time the prohibition against tats was more rigid than the present... am I wrong?
It is actually a newer set but I only recently (in the last year) started to let up on the tattoo rule. I may not be a fan but I am working on better methods to get around the tats. I think we can all agree that is better than pretending they don't exist.
you might note be a fan. I am an. I find inked women incredible sexy.
I think that that is what K is trying to respond to, in the last year, vger... she (and MA) are now acknowledging that people who like tattoos on women exist.
I don't want to give the wrong impression here, MetArt is not becoming a tattoo friendly site. It's a different standard here than with most other sites available. However, I do think any over-editing to eliminate certain aspects of the models should stop. If a model has a small tattoo it will be allowed. If a model has a huge sleeve or something, she won't be published here.
I totally agree, K. They don't have to take center stage by any means, but pretending they don't exist is unrealistic and silly. ( :
Mia is a solid 10++ As usual but the photography is lacking. The colors are good but nothing seems to be truly in focus and the photos seem grainy. Sad, Great model, nice setting with pleasant lighting but the photos just don't hold up in the mid and high res settings.
I looked at this set under hi-rez and none of the images were unsatisfactory to me. Of course, as I've said before, I know nothing of photography so maybe that's why.
Just perfect. I am a MASSIVE red head lover. Mia is awesome.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.