I´d like to believe that yellowish-greenish cast is intentional.
Bitter Green,Mr.Lightfoot?The Seller
One of my all time favorite sets on this site.
Love her look!
very nice baby !!
The photographer did a very poor job on this sexy babe. Had to wade through 81 shots before a fully nude shot of this babe. Why the need to angle the camera on some of the best portrait shots? The skin tone color was way off. Seriously, I could have done a better job with a cell phone camera.
I subscribed to this site to see fully nude models in erotic poses. Most of the poses in this set were boring, and not erotic. Only a handful of photos were worth saving. Very disappointing.
Nina North, please team up with Rylsky and do more sets. You are too good for this crappy photography. Check out the Evita Lima set by Rylsky from yesterday (Zallia) and you will see what I am talking about.
or she can team up with Arkisi. i do not like CHARLES LIGHTFOOT work. i grade him 1/10
Skin tones sometimes odd. Maybe its my eyes. Much improved.
Poor sharpness, flat lighting, washed-out colors, and boring poses. Other than that, a great set.
I love her! Her look, her beautiful face, gorgeous hair, wonderful body... Nina North looks real! Not some unattainable fantasy, but she looks like a real girl I could someday meet.
I love the set and I especially love Nina's panty play- Mr. Lightfoot gets an A+ in adding art back into Met-Art....................Bravo!
I love the sets Mr. Lightfoot has been shooting on this porch with Nina.I really wish he would stick with this style until he masters Natasha Schon's style better.
I'm confused, dog. As an artist, why would he want to imitate some other artist, particularly that one? I see a world of difference between the styles of Charles Lightfoot and Natasha Schon.
Talking about dogmatic, - versatility, flexibility, -try it, please!
When will this guy grasp the fact that this is not what most MA viewers want? Geez!
Many many moons ago, I was on a cafe date with a lady friend of mine. With a few flirtatious sideways glances, she treated me to some wonderful views up her skirt, like Nina does here, while she sipped her coffee. We rushed home to escalate things, but I've always thought about what it would have been like to release that pent-up energy right then and there. This set gives me a pretty nice idea of what that might have been like.
Right on Checkers!
Poor set. It takes forever for her to get nude. Her hair is in the way. The poses are repetitive. The fuzzy light is annoying. A disservice to the model and us subscribers.
I agree with Realz . The next set by the prince of darkness, Arkisi , endorses what Realz says .
Another great set of this stunning, incredibly sexy girl...Nina always gets me going!
Such a beautiful, knowing face, wonderful heavy breasts, big dark nipples...& a lovely languid air. Nice upskirts & extended panty shots.
Great set Charles & Nina - more like this please ( & more Nina movies please)10/10
What fascinates me is that ~ to me ~ Charles Lightfoot and Alex Lynn seem to share a similar aesthetic but while usually I am quite satisfied with Mr. Lynn's work, Mr. Lightfoot's seems to consistently frustrate me. In many of the crucial ways they are so close together but it's almost like Lynn is just over the line for me, where Lightfoot just barely doesn't get up to the line. His work really does remind me of classic Playboy style and limits and Lynn's just seems to go a little bit further. I'd love to see Mr. Lightfoot get just a little bit more daring, because MA can totally take it. It's not 2003 or 2006 anymore, and plenty of MA's artists demonstrate consistently that you can be explicit and still be very artistic, atmospheric, and respectful of the models. I'd like to see Mr. Lightfoot go there too...
Fer, I'm with you as usual. Charles has stated that this (classic playboy, less detailed) is his preferred style. While I think it's almost unfair to ask him to change for us, having seen some of his examples on his web page, I know he can (and will) shoot with more detailed images without loosing his artistic footprint. And those photos I saw were pretty daring. So I don't think we are really asking him to change. He did throw us a bone with #50, so I say we can have both.
Charles Lightfoot may be the most polarizing artist here. You either like him or you don't. I think I understand where he is coming from, so I don't agree with comments about poor quality, it is the intended effect. As a details kind of guy, it just isn't my favorite style. Then again, when you go to an art exhibit, do you have to like every painting you see?
'Charles Lightfoot may be the most polarizing artist here.' Agree: haven't seen so many subscribers so hopping mad since Slastyonoff was at the height of his powers. Everybody had an opinion about his work. Interesting that both Lightfoot & Slastyonoff do so much of their work with natural light...
Could it also be that Nina didn't want him to go "that way" - explicit-wise? You're right that Charles' work harkens back to some of the golden days of classic Playboy shots and, while there were many detractors on Nina's previous set "Dearc" that Charles shot, I liked it with it's overall kind of "gauzey" atmospheric look shot in front of a window with soft exterior light being used.
Arkie, that's a good point, but in Nina's case, not so. I've seen her work on a non-family site (which therefore out of respect shall remain nameless, although our friend Kilroy knows what site I'm talking about) and she was quite cheerfully adventurous and explicit there so I don't think that Nina has any problem in getting (quite a bit) more explicit than she does with Mr. Lightfoot. I believe we can lay this rather soft style at Mr. Lightfoot's feet, not hers. (:
bOObies, and long hair, and perfect lady bits, and … I'm sure the members can intuit what I think of Nina.
Thank you Charles and Nina for this very pleasing visit.
Wow - wow three times! A girl like dynamite. Beware, otherwise you are lost! But that would be not bad for such a girl.
A sweet tease from a very sexy girl... and I'm sure I'm not the only one who will appreciate that shot of her panties draped over the chair at the end... very evocative and provocative :-)
This set got my motor running. To bad about some of you needing a lot more. If you keep going that route there'll be nothing left for you. Nina and Charles thank you for stimulating my imagination. Now I need to settle down some. Can't wait for the next set!
Right again Rose, she is very beautiful and so small she almost matches Jeff Milton, but Jeff is two inches taller. However, her photographic values are a little larger. he he
I'll second those kinds of shots... they always speak to "something more" going on than what we see in the body of the set - imagination can be a very positive internal memory cache when sprinkled through this kind of work.
Ha ha! Funny you should mention it, that shot did jump out at me too, Rose... (:
Charles is more relaxed than Dean Martin,but at the end of the day Nina is a total spunk with fabulous nipples.10(if you could read my mind).Love Nina ,Love Blake.Well done.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.