I REALLY LOVE EBONY WOMEN!!! This is a stunning model
Me to should be much more she's absolutely delicious gorgeous
It is just such a pleasure and a privilege to see this stunning girl nude.
She is gorgeous, I'd love to see some more pose variety though. All the sets so far are about the same.
Also better focus and less grain would be a plus.
very fine chick
I love LF's photography. He catches their face, body and bottom quite lovely. But then Noel could not take a bad picture, she is so cute, beautiful and sexy. I have her on my top list. What a tan. PHEW.
The early bird catches the worms,just after opening the can.
I´d never had the chance to talk to you,dude,up ´till now a respectful guy,(and do not plan to do it again),but I believe you´ve slightly crossed a line.
a)I´m not a hater whatsoever,I´m a member who respectfully express his opinion.I love this website more than anyone,and I do not hate anyone,only demand what this site is (and always was) capable to offer.
b)The fact that you like Lightfoot´s dismal performances not only clearly shows that he is "a bit different",but that everything is good for you and that your taste is more tan questionnable.
b)The mighty "K" never looses a chance to rile up the audience,to arouse controversy,as she does with Paromov or Natascha Schon,she´s not "mocking the haters",just throwing gasoline on a fire,and singling me out and many others like Ian Thomas who clearly knows what is good photography and what is a whopping ton of garbage.
d)"K" is clearly on the side of praisers like you,people that everyday take a ton of soma for breakfast
e)If you wanna insult me,at least be a man and do not hide behind allusions.I´m tired of allusions.
You have made it clear that you hate Lightfoot's style and content. Ergo, hater. Of this.
Touchy, touchy, touchy.
Are you sure K's throwing gasoline on the fire, Seller?
My personal opinion is that she from time to time enters into certain contractual arrangements with certain artists (and, has to honor the like which predate her time as Content Manager) and, like a good businessperson, honors those contractual arrangements.
The thing is, while the majority of the membership might rue any given such arrangement, there is always a constituency for each of them. Meaning: Schon has her admirers, Lightfoot has his admirers (and they are not, as you imply here, devoid of taste, they simply have different tastes than you, which is OK because we're human beings and all have different tastes), Paromov most certainly has his admirers.
So, at the price of riling up even a majority of members for a day or two every month, she gives the admirers what they crave, and also honors certain contractual arrangements, as good businesspeople must do or fail at their business.
I see nothing in that suggesting that she's deliberately throwing gasoline on the fire.
Just my two cents' worth...
Funny(so to speak)you focused on "K"´s duties and the gasoline thing,which is something quite irrelevant to me.
The aim of my comment was my defense,as being called "a hater",is,for certain, something I hate and it´s a lie,BTW.The rest of the comment was made on the fly and it´s not important,though I still agree with everything I said.
But It´s okay. I´m also a bussinessman (I´m a Seller),and also have my priorities,so I can understand you quite well.
PD: Did you say we´re all "human beings" or "human beans"?
Lightfoot´s fans are much more likely the latter.
Provided he has any
....do I get my choice of vanilla or coffee beans to be? (; (Sorry to the lovas out there, I just can't muster enthusiasm for cacao...)
Well..can´t see your arms,bro,so I can´t tell..:)The Seller
To make the "bean" thing clear,must say I´m a Paromovian bean,but partial to green beans instead :)The Seller
Uh... all is OK until the very last "PD"
Deriding Lightfoot's (or any other photographer - or, for that matter, any model's) "fans" is NOT something that will garner you any plus points from the management. It's very much akin to calling the supporters or fans of a particular photographer or model "ignorant or lacking in taste" as most members may recall "he-whose-name-shall-never-be-spoken" said about other paying members a while back... and we all see where that got him.
Lightfoot has his appreciators (DeeDee and Rose, sometimes among a number of others) - many of which I'm sure don't even post in the comments section. But to refer to them as "beans" denigrates them for their individual tastes is wrong on so many levels.
You KOW Lightfoot has his supporters - many of them post here - so to say "Provided he has any" reduces their appreciation of his work (regardless of however YOU or anyone else feels about it) to something less than being their freedom of speech.
Just a suggestion for you to consider before hitting the "Post Comment" button next time you compose a comment...
I must say you´re right.But let me tell you that "supporters",or
"appreciators" is not rhe word I used.
In ligh of the comments I´ve read,I can not consider Rose or Dee as "self confessed fans" of Mr.Lightfoot´s work,
You know how much I like to play on words,and this is just an innocent comment,not meant to do any harm.And of course,my excuses if someone felt dissapoined about it.
That said,I must say I´m not interested in points from the management or whatever.If someone consider it´s time to get rid of me,okay.I´ve never been involved in "ass kissing".That´s not my style.
This has gone too far,I come here to have a good time.Let me get my message clear once and for all,I do like Lightfoot´s style.I do not like his more the questionnable technical skills and final outcomes.And many people believes the same as me.
Thenk you for your valuable remarks.
Sorry... obviously I meant to type "You KNOW Lightfoot has his supporters..."
Attack of FFTK syndrome (Fat Fingers/Tiny Keycaps)
The "2" is misaligned, It read Square Dee
I hate digital high iso noise&noise reduction artifacts so much...
I'm just curious...with everyone bandying about various technical photographic terms, just what do you mean by the terms 1) digital high iso noise and 2) noise reduction artifacts?
if you crank up the 'iso' setting in a digitial camera, more and more sensor noise is taken as 'real' information by the digital signal processing and ends up in the final picture. These are seen as a colourful 'shade'made of random colour pixels that become more and more prominent. Until you reach the point where there is no picture left, just random noise.
Noise reduction tries to combat that by interpolation and other mathematical tricks.
But sadly, these 'tricks' destry details and blurr the picture. Combined with jpegs block-y compression scheme the results are painful for me.
I am just a mediocre hobby shooter (macro mostly) and if I have to go beyond iso 400 I get another flash - for maximum details. Despite the fact that many claim that iso 1600 would be good enough with my gear. Not for me. But I also do not do jpeg exports.. so I am probably just some idiot with an opinion.
Still, I am a PAYING idiot with an opinion, and I really hate high iso digital colour photography.
I am fine with high iso film black&white, that can look awesome. But film just becomes grainy, digital noise introduces... well, noise. And the reduction just does not work for me.
So, if CL decided to take some B&W high iso medium format or larger film pics, scan them and then K decided to upload those - I can imagine praising the set.
But digital high iso? Nope, not my cup of tea at all.
Perfectly explained,Vahman,and I also hate Digital and high ISO noise.That´s because I do not like Lighfoot´s outcomes,aside from de greenish shift.
Gorgeous set of Noel.
And Charles has been quite the busy boy lately. :)
Yummy chocolate candy!
Terrific...but 29" hips??? Though they looks small, some fudging seems to be going on. I'd like to personally verify this data solely in the interest of ongoing statistical integrity.
What a beauty! She looks like a young Garcelle Beauvais... the hottie from those old R. Kelly videos. The lighting in these shots are just phenomenal! So classy and tasteful. :)
Wonderful, wonderful set of the beautiful Monique. I like the changes in settings and the wonderful variety of poses. Obviously it's not so easy to move around a house as often as they do for this set, as each new scenario involves moving all the lighting rigs, but the extra effort is really appreciated.
Dammit, I meant of the beautiful NOEL. I can't brain today, I has the dumb.
✓ Meds... obviously running low on some, particularly those of the bourbon/beer/vodka families. ;-)
I kan haz dumb too? (;
Sher! Awl arr welkum.
I personally love girls with brown skin - and have had some wonferful
fulfilling encounters with very friendly, strong and hot tempered girls. The fotos bring back sweet memories - thank you and go on to bring foto-sets from the lovliest girls around the world!
Top class beauty... extremely sweet, extremely hot... adorable... many thanks for beautiful pictures.
I have never slept with a woman of color, but Noel would be a wonderful choice to be my first. She is absolutely beautiful.
Noel is exquisitely beautiful with a warm genuine smile. Nicely done!
Noel is quite stunning with a beautiful face fabulous body and the most wonderful sensuous lips...mmmm
Love the little g string - we could do with a few more of these I think. Nice set of this beauty
Cute as cute can be! Just an adorable little doll – and sexy too :-)
Not to mention poise and self-confidence. Noel Monique is a total favorite. I gave a 10 to infinity all around for this masterpiece of beauty as well as eroticism. IMHO this is where Slastyonov missed the boat in todays shoot of Nordica. Explicit isn't NECESSACARILY beautiful. (boy,does my spelling suck thee big one)
R U tryin' to say "your writ ritin' is rit rotten?", that you're medication hasn't kicked in today or that you're sufferin' from FFTK syndrome? inquiring mines wanna kno...
P.S. My complaint about Charles is he sometimes does not do enough to calm a nervous model. I consider this a primary responsibility of the directing photographer, for videos or still sets.I otherwise love his work and always have, from "Presenting Nina North"on.
Oh heck... I don't see a lick of Nervous on lovely Noel's face. I see a lot of big, genuine, comfortable smiles. Maybe that's just me, but I really don't know what you're talking about if you're saying that Noel somehow looks "nervous" in this set, or in any of her work with Charles.
Nina North was very obviously nervous in her first movie and sets.
This face is a work of art!
More! Much more of Noel, please!
I remember a complaint from The Seller two days ago, that we'd had two photosets and one movie in June already, from Charles Lightfoot. Here now, I'm starting to suspect that K is mocking the haters!
Charles Lightfoot's style is a bit different, an acquired taste (and I took some time to acquire it). Without detracting from The Seller's opinion, which he's perfectly entitled to, I'll say right now that I adore Noel Monique. She seems to suit his style perfectly, along with Kylie Quinn and Lucy Doll, we have a trio that is always a pleasure to see.
The MetArt network uses your email address to send you more information about our products/services, events, news and offers.
You can unsubscribe at any time by using the unsubscribe link located in our emails we send you.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2018 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.