A perfect set, of a perfect women. Every picture is worth framing.
Truly a pussy to be adored.
Pandora is spectacular! If she was in my life I would be on that all the time. Then she inevitably would grow tired of me...so sad. Good thing there is a digital interface giving us some space, and in HD, too.
Pandora's Box.......OOhhhh I want to open it!
Sexy set of a beautiful sexy woman. Love the booty sequence 119-126.
Can you believe that some women pay good money to have labiae like Pandora's REMOVED?
Sad but true. Thankfully not Pandora, and glad she is proud to show us her blessings in that area.
The girl: WOW; the smile: WOW; the outfit: WOW; the pictures: WOW.
One box which is always a joy to open! Pandora is simply stunning.
For a slim girl with a tight little bum and slender ankles, she has been blessed with lovely full breasts and beautiful generous labia,which she shares with us here in glorious close up.
Very sexy set, very sexy girl..
I think I am going to study lepidoptera.
Very pleased with the choice of outfit at the beginning of this set. A waistcoat, stockings, and nothing else? Hooray!
It would have been spot on had she been sporting a sexy pair of matching stilettos (NOT frankenshoes! LOL)
Ooooooooooooh, I like the way you think. :)
I was waiting for the Hooray for bottomlessness!
This set was especially hooray-worthy. :)
Lovely Lady Pandora... with all her beauty and sweetness... breathtaking.
A visit from lovely Pandora is ALWAYS a monthly highlight for me. I don't relish having to wait four weeks plus to see her again.
Pandora has inspired three (and counting ?) shooters; today, Fabrice is the one. I am inspired by her lovely eyes, significant eyebrows, captivating smile and dimples, large areolae and rigid nipples, and her PERFECT lady bits. More standing, full body, images viewed from behind would have showcased her beautiful bum.
Thank you Pandora, thank you Fabrice!
Great to see more butterfly labia shots now on MetArt. A step in the right direction. Certainly not pornographic - just lovely. Well done @Pandora and @Fabrice
Personally, I think there can be a big distinction between "explicit" and "pornographic." I think it's all in the process and in the presentation. Porn is depersonalized and mechanical and frequently by-the-numbers assembly line: explicit can be artistic and individual and an expression of both the artist's erotic vision and the model's sexuality. Much depends on the way the photographer and model work together but I think the judge who said something like "I can tell pornographic when I see it" was dead on. There just isn't any spirit to pornographic material: there's spirit in erotica IMO.
Every time I see an indoor set by Goncharov,I try to guess the color treatment he gives all his work in post processing,in order to achieve that pleasing pastel color palette and the particular skintone all his models show.Don´t know if it´s a subtle cross-processing or so,but it´s definitely the author´s hallmark.The Seller
This set is attributed to Fabrice, and as far as I can see Goncharov's last contribution to MA was in July 2014, a beautiful set of Tayra A. I do love his work.
Wanderer, there is a "conspiracy theory" of sorts going around that Fabrice is actually Goncharov's next "screen name." Some days I find myself agreeing ~ if you look at their models, there is actually a fair amount of overlap ~ but I'm not totally convinced, myself. There are some big distinctions in style between Goncharov and Fabrice. However, every time I have myself totally convinced that they are NOT the same, I see another element of Goncharov's style in a Fabrice set. So I just don't know what to think...
Thanks for that. The dates make sense. But why would a photographer build up a reputation and then change name? Rose would know.
What's interesting is that he was only known as Goncharov here. He has five or six other aliases on other sites on which his work appears, and he's changed his name on a couple of those as well. I don't know why so many names, it makes it difficult to keep track of all his work. And what wonderful work it is.
They are one and the same, Wanderer. One takes up where the other leaves off. The second most prolific artist here, with 1066 sets combined.
Kilroy, I'm not saying Fabrice is NOT Goncharov, but if he is, he evolved his style considerably when he changed screen names...
_fer, I thought it was a stone-cold fact, but I've been wrong before. Lets ask Frank, our chapter historian. Or as Wanderer suggests, Rose would surely have the inside scoop.
Does Fabrice = Goncharov?
You know, kilroy, I frequently got frustrated with Goncharov's style ~ it was just too tame. He was one of the artists who walked right up to the edge and then backed off. Whereas, I don't usually feel that way about a Fabrice set.
It's quite possible that he changed his name when he switched to a more explicit style. Maybe he wanted to "start over fresh" with the members? Perhaps he felt he'd done everything he'd set out to do as Goncharov, and needed to "be" someone else to do something new?
I agree that we should ask Frank and Rose, however. They might know, or they might know who'd know.
Perhaps even K would care to enlighten us?
Fabrice IS Goncharov,believe The Seller,buddies,I never just a single lie...The Seller
I´m used to telling more than one...
I'd believe The Seller before I'd believe any of our Presidential candidates, especially Hillary!
@Kilroy:"You´ll go far,young man"
So, you'd believe Trump before Hillary. Man, you need help.
(Sorry, Kilroy. You started it.)
Benjy, That's not what I said. Of all of them, one shines out as being habitually dishonest as shown in opinion polls. It's pretty bad if even the NY Times opinion writers point it out.
Zeller for prez!
Donald trumps Hillary
So many lovely things about Pandora to admire, but my eyes keep getting drawn back to her long silky hair :-)
Good for you, Rose. My eyes keep getting drawn elsewhere!
The last sequence of bottom shots are divine love that ass. It is just so inviting especially when it is opened wide. What a great day this is turning out to be. 8)
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.