Mag sie lieber ganz nackt...
haute model and I mean that in a good way. :-) That last shot was a grabber!!
Beautiful girl. Not a fan of the clunky heels she's wearing through most of the shoot. She also seems to go in for (poorly done, IMO) anal bleaching.
What's to like here?
An uncluttered setting that seems to have no purpose but to exist for the presence of this model.
Perfect clarity (on my ipad)
Elegant and classy combined with openly explicit.
A white background without glare or washout.
Simplicity and neutrality of color, except for the luxuriously flattering green.
Simplicity and neutrality of texture and design, except for the fancy frame of the sofa (and it's not silver!)
Incredible ass/leg combo posing.
A presentation of la grande bellezza and her little friend as good as anywhere on site.
Whole body shots with the effect of close ups.
Mostly superb framing (rach's objections noted)Perhaps not the best facial expressions of our model. Perhaps she is not entirely comfortable with the temperature.
Perhaps could use the dress more creatively. Some photos with it pulled up and some with it dropping down, with not so many bunched around the middle.
Part of the mons is lost in the lovely 117. (And 121)
The luscious 121 might (I'm just saying might) be improved with a lower camera angle.
Definitely looks like it was a wee bit chilly in that room. Not only were her "headlights" on high-beam (no complaints on THAT from me, lol), you could see her gooseflesh in some of the close-up body shots.
Facial expressions got me too. I prefer smiling, laughing models. Sandra is a doll...no doubt about it. However some of the expressions would encourage me to sleep with one eye open.
That's good practice in any case....;o)
wheres my wife shes making me horney
No comment !
Ten plus for two
Welcome to the "Headchoppers Ball"! A shame that one of the sexiest girls on the site was a willing participant... Nice set otherwise...
Not really that many problems with the head here, certainly not when compared to the rest of the site.
You're right...there isn't that many in this set, but the ones that are, are pretty bad... 15 in particular!
Sandra Lauver is quite a slender, classic, beauty and Rylsky has done her full justice here. I notice in some close-up shots, no 34 for example, that Sandra is having her anus bleached, as well as waxing the undercarriage. I don't think that is necessary, waxing is plenty
Noooooo! Coloration and shading is part of beautiful skin!
That's right! That's why tattoos are so attractive when done artistically!
@ 5seadog: If it stifles papacito's urge to write, I thank Sandra.
Are you faulting the man for voicing his opinion? I thought we ALL paid to get in here...;o) And just because she "may" be bleaching it, doesn't mean that she can't show up "less than immaculate"... In fact if she does, it will be a lot more noticeable if her anus is "bleached"... That "brown eye" should probably remain brown...;o)
Today is evidently "gorgeous eyes day" on MET. Sandra contributes her usual loveliness to the cause.
What a Babe ! Sultry and sexy . Come back soon Sandra.
Long and lean; from the top of her head to the soles of her feet, and everywhere in between.
I appreciate the hint of ribs every now and then.
Thanks to Sandra and Rylsky.
This is the kind of set I love to see Rylsky shoot. ( :
Where he whacks off her head!? Yeah....real nice.
Derh... not talking about THAT, Rock. ( :
I'm talking about the variety and type of poses. Very very nice explicit poses here... ( :
Sandra's posing is ALWAYS titilating! She loves to show us what we need to see...:o) But HIS headchopping is getting worse with every set....old OR new! Great consistency!! ;o)
Btw... I KNOW what you meant...lol ;o)
Oh, fear not, I am quite sure you did, Rock! :D
Not gonna stop me from ribbin' ya!
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.