ok, call me weird, but I love Sheela's nose! It compliments her pretty face perfectly!
Nothing weird about that at all! I feel exactly the same. ( :
I like pretty girls naked.
Sheela can do things with her hot body that black lace is meant for. I love her freckles too. I hope this means that her self-comfidence about modeling at 143 pounds has increased to the point she will stay with us for some time.
The stupid lighting and the distractive background ruined this set. The lighting cast shades of brown streaks on the model's beautiful skin. Next time, keep it simple and let the subject show through.
Normally there isn't one set where I like all of its pictures. Even with my favorite models.
Either I don't like a pose, or the light she's shown in, etc.
But here when I clicked through Sheela's pictures one by one, there wasn't a single photo that I would discard. These photos are like as if I could touch her.
Man, I imagine I see her somewhere out there, and a guy next to me says "you call those big breasts womanly curves?". What a fool! hahahaha
My gripe with Leonardo...
Pic 123...focus ain't..where it "s'posed" to be!!
He insists on total control, and refuses to take his model's cues. Makes for a lot of bad shots...from my perspective.
Agree 100%, rachsback! Not that her cute freckly face doesn't deserve some attention, but as you say, in 123 the focus isn't where it's supposed to be- the model is spreading her legs, the least you could do Leonardo, is take a #124 shot and change the focus.
Geez, how many times do I need to harp on this subject? I'm not alone in feeling this way. When I was a working professional photographer, I gratefully took suggestions on how to improve my craft. Is anybody listening? Maybe we are just chattering amongst ourselves. (?)
Red & Rock, you are not alone. Leonardo is one of our photogs that has never (to my knowledge) participated in the comments. Is he listening? Who knows.
I know its not a democracy, and artistic license does amount to something. That doesn't make it any less frustrating. Not all will be such interactive photogs like DeltaGamma, Catherine and Rylsky.
Leonardo has never (to my knowledge) participated in comments, but feedback from comments has gotten back to him. The proof is that his old pre-comment forum shoots never had closeup shots in them: now he includes closeup shots because a bunch of members complained vociferously and repeatedly that Leonardo never did closeup shots. So CLEARLY he does listen to feedback from comments, even if he never comments.
Sheela is a really pretty girl, and her body is naturally beautiful. The black lingerie is stunning on her body.......but what is with the blue plaid blanket background? She is too pretty for plaid:)
Sheela is a gorgeous young woman and this is a beautiful photo set. I unabashedly adore her huge breasts. I also admire and enjoy all the rest of her face and body. She is all around thrilling. Thank you for presenting her in such an attractive and appealing way. I believe there is only one movie of her. Please let us have more.
Yes, another movie of Sheela would be DELIGHTFUL.
I wonder if the amazing Flora would be up for the challenge? ( :
I completely agree with your assessment. Thank you for putting it so well. Yes, please let us have more!
I'm gonna sue Sheela and MetArt for trying to give me a heart attack.
Just joking :D
WHY don't you fix the resolution selection problem?! This is the third time in succession that the first set of the day has had this problem. You still have not fixed the first sets from October 10 and 11. Annoying.
I think Met-art is run by martians who done give a damn
Maybe the people who work for MetArt are wanking off as much as the customers!
It certainly does seem nobody is listening...
Folks, as you'll see above, I have reported the glitch and the guys are working on it...
For whoever is interested, the whole Met Art network of sites are being upgraded.
SexArt and EroticBeauty have already switched over to the new site design. Several weekends ago, Met Art switched servers. Many of the glitches we've been living through have been the result of this switch.
Additionally, the new iteration of "MyMet" is a result of the new site design.
I don't like it myself, and I've dropped the suggestion to MetArt support that they reintegrate the old "MyMet" into the new site design. Whatever you think of the new features as they are rolled out, you should also share your opinion with MetArt support.
SexArt and EroticBeauty have been open to feedback and have modified their new site design according to the feedback they've gotten. I assume MetArt will do the same.
100% Perfect in every way. THOSE EYES can melt a glacier! But I did notice that she has rings on her fingers. Rings that don't just look like ordinary rings. Presumably some lucky man gets to feel her warmth and softness and has probably squeezed the life out of all of her body parts already. I RARELY see Met Art models with rings like THOSE on their fingers!
If I had a poster printer #68 would be framed on the wall. It captures her beautiful voluptuous curves as well has that perfect melt me face. How many times will her freckled nose and green eyes be complimented? ;)
Sheela's marvelous curves bring light to my day. She's just wondrous.
Great choice of lingerie, too. It takes real womanly curves to carry off a sexy number like this.
"real womanly curves"?? Is THAT what they're calling giant breasts these days?
Popkas, popkas, rah, rah, rah...
Dude... seriously?!? Her breasts are the ONLY curvy parts of her you see?!?
I think you need to run to the optometrist, my man!
Always nice to see more of Sheela, she's a tremendously beautiful girl with a breathtakingly voluptuous body, which she displays for us perfectly. I hope there's still a lot more to come.
A wonderful set of pictures.
Sheela is one of my favorite current MA models, and not for the obvious reasons, because the size of a woman's breasts really doesn't make a great deal of difference to me when it comes to her attractiveness to me. It factors in, but is not within the top factors.
Rather, Sheela has a very pretty, open, and soulful face with a broad range of expressions, all of which to me seem gentle and vulnerable. I would find it impossible to say no to any request she made of me...
One pleasant side effect of the ongoing default high rez MA software glitch is that under low rez I probably would not have noticed Sheela's delightful freckles, that seem to focus primarily on her lovely nose. What a treat!
99% of the population has freckles fer... "They're not just for gingers anymore!!" ;o)
You're probably right, Rock, not gonna argue with you. However, freckles are not always visible, and you have to admit Sheela's are delightfully cute.
I've reported the glitch, hopefully that will be fixed soon - but you make a good point about the freckles! I just checked them out, they are adorable :-)
@ fer_realz and Rose:
I didn't get the memo!
Please tell me more about "the ongoing default hi rez MA software glitch"
Some photosets have been opening in hi rez automatically, instead of low rez, which is the norm. Seems to be fixed now though. And like _fer_realz_ pointed out, it can sometimes have unexpected advantages :-)
Yep, it's been happening with one set per day for the last several days.
Thanks for reporting it for us, Rose! ( :
Thank you Rose.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2018 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.