Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Rekka Adagio
Nohay Violla A
Rekka Adagio
Nohay Violla A

25 Members commented on Susie's gallery

m

meb1917 4 months ago

What's wrong with the camera man? The most pix are out of focus.

N

Nick101 5 months ago

I've scored this as a 9 on the basis of only 1 picture... https://members.metart.com/members/model/susie/gallery/20150307/OGGI/image/119/medium/

is astonishing - every MA set ought to have this pose - prefer some more depth of field though!

M

Mike1 1 year ago

Fabulous model and fabulous pussy - displayed fantastically. Brilliant.

M

Mike1 2 years ago

119 the picture all MetArt sets ought to have. Not sure some of the tagging here though is right. The tagging ought to be moderated so it's useful.

D

Dickhead 3 years ago

Retarded Photographer. Thanks for all the out of focus shots. Beautiful model ruined by depth of field ignorance.

S

Sapphiramazed 3 years ago

I just love a model who poses like Susie!!! Hope to see many more sets with her.

w

will121 3 years ago

Susie has the most stunning hair. Love the length, curls and gorgeous colours

w

wbtwo 3 years ago

sexy susie! nice set 10/10

T

Thriplingweasel 3 years ago

Beautiful model, but the set was ruined by Leonardo. I have to say I disagree with Hawkeye as other photographers don't seem to have the out of focus problems Leonardo does. Like I've said before it is this type of problem with some photographers that will stop me from renewing my membership here. Getting a digital SLR does not a photographer make.

H

Hawkeye287 3 years ago

I see we have another "shot" at Leonardo over out of focus pussy shots.
Must be referring to images 118 and 119
Depending on the pose and the focal point of the shot there will always be elements of any shot that are out of focus,that's just the way a camera lens works.
In any shot of a model naked or not laying on her back with her butt towards the camera and the focus on her face will have elements in the foreground out of focus.
Leonardo has composed another excellent set capturing Susie's beauty
Well done once again sir

s

squid diver 3 years ago

Your analysis is not completely true. Focal point is only one aspect of capturing an image in focus. The other aspect that I think nearly all of the photographers on this site are guilty of is minimizing the depth of field.
This is controlled by the aperture. Bigger aperture, shorter depth of field (on an extreme pussy shot, only part of the pussy is in focus) Smaller aperture, greater depth of field, the entire model can be in focus.
The tendency of many photographers, specially here, is to use a larger aperture. This lets in more light and you can use a faster shutter speed, thus minimizing blur if the model is moving. However, these models are not athletes running wide open down a field so there should be no reason a smaller aperture can be used with a lower shutter speed. The majority of the sets on this site could be improved tremendously if the photographers would pay as much attention to their camera settings as they did directing the models.
This set is an incredible example of poor photography. Why have multiple spread leg shots where the honey pot is clearly being presented but never in focus.

k

kilroy 3 years ago

I don't claim to speak for wgworld or greg42, but 118 & 119 is a prime example of what seems to be a common complaint with this artist, particularly his older work.

If you are taking two (or more) very similar shots from the same angle, I don't see the problem in adjusting the focal point on just one of them. Why should both be nearly the same? My contention is not that the focus is always on the wrong element, but that another focal point was missed for that scene/pose.

Still a nice set and a very nice model, just a minor issue in my book.

C

Checkers 3 years ago

What a delightfully impractical top she's wearing. Doesn't seem to me that it would provide much warmth or coverage.

Lucky for us. :)

j

justagigolo 3 years ago

As a fan of nudity rather than clothing, this debate normally passes me by, but on this occasion I have to agree that the shots of her NOT covered much by that top were enticing.

I see Leonardo heading in some new directions after being set in a couple of rigid patterns. He does make mistakes along the way (focus and obscuring those fine breasts as noted above) but if that is the price for an artistic venture, I'm happy with that in the near term.

k

kilroy 3 years ago

What, no hooray today?

C

Checkers 3 years ago

H O O R A Y F O R B O T T O M L E S S N E S S !

k

kilroy 3 years ago

Much better, thank you! :)

f

_fer_realz_ 3 years ago

*whew* for a moment there I thought I was gonna have to jump in and pinch-hit for Checkers! ( ;

k

kilroy 3 years ago

Susie's pretty smile and long curled hair get my attention. Still a newcomer with this her third posted set, but quickly rising on my list. The grey shirt was on too long, but still a good set.

w

wgworld 3 years ago

Oh look .... out of focus pussy shots. Must be a Leonardo session.

Too bad .....this smokin' hot model deserves better !!!

G

Greg42 3 years ago

Yep, he's clearly ignorant to feedback. Even shots where she's got her pussy spread and close to the camera... he focuses on her face. Unbelievable.

m

metlover 3 years ago

She is smoking hot

G

Gary 3 years ago

Beautiful model with perfect small tits. Too bad they were hidden so often by hair, clothing and poses.

T

Tokyo Sukimono 3 years ago

In the colour & focusing on, I prefer "Presenting Susie".
-Tokyo Sukimono-

D

Drago 3 years ago

If many Armenian woman have bodies as pretty as Susie I will need to make a trip to Yerevan. Maybe Susie can be tour guide to Mount Ararat for me:))
I am fond of Susies smile and attitude. These qualities make her look beautiful.
Thank you Susie and photographer Leonardo. I feel this set is a 10!

More sets of our models in the MetArt Network

18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement.

All materials © 2018 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.