It would be nice to see more of a dripping wet pussy shots it would be lovely
Just read these comments - I think this is a great set. It's very sexy, intimate - the pictures are truly erotic. Well done @DeltaGamma - keep it up - those around image 80 - wow! Fabulous model and photo's in my view.
Vanessa's lubricated pussy looks SO inviting.
Like I said before in her previous set, "Vanessa Angel is one of the most beautiful girls on MetArt....I love Vanessa Angel's beautiful face; and sexy and juicy butt and hips". I love the shots of her sexy honey buns.
However the photography on this set is not great because of the poor color quality and the stupid black and white photos. The B&W photos are totally useless; and please stop.
Deltagamma, what is the purpose of the B&W photos?
Just because the artist likes the vintage photo style and they are something you don't see much of here. They are always in addition to the normal quota of 120 or more color shots and some of us like the variety.
Fabulous...and definitely very yummy!
As a statistical aside: I observer the voting on Venenso until if reached 40 votes. I count 7 "1s" and she bottomed out at 6.73. Now with 202 she is at 8.74. Statistical if you then calculate it at 195 with the seven 1s removed she would be at 9.02 so do the 1 attacks on the artist have an effect on the model? And you have read Delta's explanation of Vanessa's feelings about sharing herself. And thus was punished by those who never even reviewed her work. But rememebr it is their "right"...
At the end of the day without the known 7 1s she would have with 250 votes 9.06. Cest La Vie!
The one's can be very bad for a model especially if she is an exclusive. The effect can be very negative Especially when they get their votes in early because it then has maximum effect. People tend to read the numbers and it effects the way they vote.
On a positive note, I love Vanessa's pretty, intelligent looking face.
As Dylan once wrote: She knows too much to argue or to judge.
I am certain that you are among the majority of us. For me it's the eyes that I can hardly tear my eyes away from! Each new photo my eyes are immediately drawn to them before I can go further. I could lose myself in there without a doubt.
Like I said before, this work of DG is simply "DISTURBED", "MACABRE"; I guess its ok to witness the dark side once in a while, if your thoughts are embedded in the oblivion!
Also, I am glad you feel that way Checkers, because that's the intent, to stop you clowns from commenting, "flaccid ones", and mucking up a once truly great website, you can bet over half, (at least 65% is a reasonable estimate) of the viewers feel the same way, I speak for them! You guys have no significant others in your life, its obvious and unnerving that some of artists believe people actually like some of this crap!
Keepin' it classy as usual, hotte.
@Hotty The Joker
I do not know if you were adopted,or you have bad breath,clammy hands or perhaps erectile dysfunction or,all at once,or whatever,
What I do know for sure is you have to go.
A pity,on the other hand.You´re our most cherished troll.A rather amusing freaky.
Bye,bye Hotty.The JokerThe Seller
Hotte, you are crossing the line with this comment. Please be respectful to your fellow members, whether or not you agree with their opinions. As I've mentioned to you before, if you don't like the comments, don't read them! They are here for those members who do like them. You speak only for yourself, not for anyone else. Please consider this to be an official warning to watch your manners.
I stand with Rose. And I wish our individual accounts contained a Plonk File function that allowed us to completely block the comments of selected people.
They had one on the old Metcams,we could use it here
Sounds good to me. Better yet bring back the thumbs down so we can show people like this just how unpopular their opinions really are! It never ceases to amaze me how self endowed these people are. Most of us know that our opinions are ours alone but there always seem to be those that think that there all mighty opinion is THE only truly right one and they represent the silent majority. We are always better off without these self endowed "SAVIORS" I can insure you that the few that have been disavowed have never been mourned! RIP agitators you won't be missed!
Hearken back to when we had the thumbs down button, hip.
We always were wondering how an entirely non-offensive comment by members such as nice Neil could generate a ton of thumbs down.
At least this way we can see who is reasonable, who is not, who is anti social, who does not play nicely with the other children ...
I am convinced that shunning, (completely ignoring the comments) of the trolls who only post for their 15 seconds of fame will hurt them and maybe even quiet them.
Thank you for being the voice of reason, Baggy. Very sensible attitude :-)
Blushing here, Rose.
I don't remember seeing reason and Baggy on the same page, let alone the same sentance before.
I wrote to Vanessa and she was very happy to find out about our set being published today, and she loved reading your nice comments, she always gets surprised of how much she is liked by you members. We spoke about planning a new shooting and she is willing to do it soon, and so am I.
She's my favourite model in all of Met-Art. She has a beautiful body and the sweetest face. And if I may say, the yummiest pussy! :)
That's awesome. Vanessa is one of my all time favorite models. She is so adorably cute. I would love to see a video of her, even if it's "just a behind the scenes" video. I'm am thankful for all the photo shoots of her and I'm happy that Vanessa still does nude modeling.
That is very good news!
She gets my vote for "Model I'd most liked to cuddle up with, on a lazy Sunday morning in bed".
So do agree!
Pant, pant, pant... HOORAY! Pant, pant, pant... HOORAY! Pant, pant, pant... HOORAY! As a bottomless fan (you may have heard), I'm rather fond of the opening segment of this set. That serene, inviting look on Vanessa's face is a big, Big BIG reason why. Makes me want to assist her with her lazy, carefree, half-undressed goals for the day.
I realize, now that I think about it, that using the word "pant" while proclaiming excitement for a woman nude below the waist is probably not quite appropriate.
Why? Isn't that what photos like that are supposed to do to normal healthy guys? Maybe not exactly PC but honest anyway. ;)
It's the lack of pants that's making me say "hooray." :)
Shoulda tried "Hips, hips, hips...HOORAY!" ;-p
never mind Checkers... ;)
DG has done it again two days in a row. I have always considered him a great artist and the sets he has shown us these last two days prove it.Vanessa is a favorite of mine and he always does her justice, I agree that if the model is not comfortable, the set will not be good, no matter how beautiful the girl.
I hope Rose is equally comfortable at her session with DG we really want to see those abs she has been working on so hard.
Totally agree, Capt. no need for me to say more.
Rose to shoot with DG? You're not serious are you?
Sure am Kilroy,I really want to see those abs she has been working on. (She can keep the bra and knickers on,being a modest, retiring, Victorian, kind of girl
Not likely, Our Rose is camera shy. She prefers to stay on the other side of the cameras.
Yeah, Seadog has a long term project of convincing Rose to pose for us. (:
Vanessa truly is the Angel of MET-ART. What a mind-blowingly gorgeous woman she is! And despite her incredible beauty, she looks to be the sweetest, most lovable woman on the planet. I'm pretty sure if I heard her voice, I'd be buying a ring and a plane ticket.
Vanessa's smile in images 143 - 158 was subtle and delightful and reminded me very much of the same from Paula Shy, who has also posed for Deltagamma. Any chance of pairing the two in a future photo set?
Hi Fenway, glad you are one of the admirers of Vanessa's sweet smile, it's also irresistable to me. Your remark is very interesting now that I think about it.
Although Vanessa doesn't shoot lesbian scenes a soft set for Metart with her and Paula is theoretically possible, why not. They actually met at a shooting earlier that year, in Prague.
I have always loved Vanessa from that very first set. I realised from the start that she was a gentle , sweet soul and your sets and what you say in the comments just serve to prove I was not wrong. It is her soft sweet demeanor that sets her apart. Yes she is lovely and yes she has a great body but they are just supporting attributes to the warm sensuous soul that you sense in her.
I have no doubt at all that she would be a treasure to call friend!
very nice comment from you hipshot, it really describes Vanessa's essence in a superb way.
No need to complain about anything here. Model and artist doing a great job. I am interested in the way the image is manipulated by the change in colour. most often I prefer the more monochrome version.
ziggy if you are on facebook find the David Deltagamma page and leave a comment identifying yourseld as the ziggy from here and I am sure Delta will explain what hi is doing for you in detail and welcome aboard
Thanks for the tip but I just don't like Facebook. Not for me.
I may not have commented on your work before but I always leave your work until last to open when its up on a day. You see I always leave the best until last.
Hi ziggyzaq, it's nice to hear from a new member, I believe it's the first time you comment on one of my sets? Thank you for the nice words for the work Vanessa and I did. I am glad there is one more member who appreciates photography also in its classics as well as experiments, that's a great challenge for me.
My 11th posting with Vanessa on Met, currently my 3rd most featured model after Lauren Crist and Sunshine.
As I have been repeating at every opportunity, Vanessa is the perfect model to work with and of course a personal favorite of mine. We consider ourselves friends rather than just into a photographer-model relationship, and I always try to show in the pictures with the relaxed atmosphere and the openness (in every meaning) Vanessa yields when we shoot.
This set, as remarked by Frank/swplf2, was shot in June 2014 in Rome, few days after my shooting in Prague where I shot for the first time Nici Dee (featured in yesterday's set). The idea to plan the shooting in Italy came on Easter earlier that year, I was having a pic-nic in a beautiful park in Rome and sent a message to Vanessa, telling her that it would have been great to have her there those warm and sunny days. Vanessa had been living some disappointments in her life at that time, and maybe the idea to break away from the cold and grey weather of Prague and take a breath of Italian lifestyle gave her a sweet smile and she took the decision to travel. So we finally arranged it and there she was. The set was shot at our home, in a very relaxed atmosphere, a very simple and mild setting, with nothing but Vanessa in the focus of my lens and mind. She is so sweet and delicate, a beautiful flower who opens only when she feels safe and comfortable, and that is a real pride for me.
This set also has a bitter-sweet feeling because the following month during my trip to Prague all my photogear was stolen on the way back, after shooting several models including Vanessa again. Now that all the equipment has been replaced the only thing that hurts is the fact that those sets (with Vanessa, Sapphira, Dido A, Paula Shy, Celeste at her first shooting and a newcomer) are lost forever. But I still dream of repeating the shooting in the same location with the same models. But there will always be a 'before' and an 'after'.
DeltaGamma, I love that you go into the history of your photoshoots, and that you actually read the texts on your shoots, sometimes answering (even your detractors, who you answer with proper aplomb and humor). Giving us a timeline sometimes helps to see the progression of how comfortable the women are with their bodies in relation to the cameras, and I, for one, love to get the insights into their lives through your words. We're also following the women around the world, traveling with them, and it's nice to know where we are. It's a refreshing change from "Behold! Look at this!" Through your words, these women become living, breathing, beautiful, wonderful PEOPLE, instead of just creatures of fantasy.
I hope some of the other authors will take the same care to give us this view of their world, as well as the women's.
Vanessa is one of my most favorites. She is so beautiful and has a wonderful smile. I would love to give her a big hug and adore her. This photo shoot really show how wonderful and sweet Vanessa is and captures her wonderful smile. I am smitten!
Our little angel Vanessa might be on the couch today, but she's the therapist here... (: I know I could use some of brother Marvin's "Soulful" healing if you know what I mean. Especially if she deployed that lovely creamy pink butterfly for me, though all thoughts of therapy would rather quickly leave my mind at that point... (:
Thanks for an awesome set of Vanessa, Davi. (: This makes me ~ very, very happy to see. (: (: (:
fer, with such a beauty as the therapist you would go crazy even if you're not..
The 'butterfly effect' Vanessa delivers is something that can perturb our minds but I guess everybody would be more than happy to pay the price.
And more than happy am I adding another chapter to Vanessa's history on Metart, hoping it will last long.
I hope so too
Sensual sunshine of the day... I am in love with her dark and deep eyes... lovable baby...
The sunshine is out of my window now, Rocky.. I should really call Vanessa and organise our next shooting right away... So really lovable.. just adorable
I am a great admirer of Delta's work and his artistic vision .My only gripe is that the sets are tad long .200 photos today, albeit all wonderful .
The good thing about sets with too many pics is that you can delete the ones you don't like, and still have lots and lots of photos. I'd much rather have too many than not enough. :)
I can agree ergo, althoug if you consider only on the regular color pics you have 150 which is just 30 more than the standard. In certain cases 'melius abundare quam deficere' ;)
Well said sire. I can only agree .
Oy... well, I guess if you GOTTA find SOMETHING to complain about. LOL
Personally I'd rather have too many pics than too few. I'm also subscribed to several other "family" sites where the set length is usually from 45-70 pictures and I'm sorry that just isn't enough IMO.
Vanessa is one of my favorite models. Delta is my top favorite photographer on met art. as usual i graded this set before my download completes and i can view it. i wish you best luck in your career Delta.
I'm flattered kmkronful.. thank you for the wishes along with the nice words and consideration, I will do my best to deserve that..
It's Nice to Start Out Sunday with A Visit from The Girl Next Door!!!! Vanessa is my Idea of The Poster Girl for This Cliche. My Bad..........but She Fits The Description so very well! I Like The Way Delta Taps into The Vulnerability That Lies Within!! Keep The Deltagamma Sets Rolling Please!!
Hi again CZM, The Girl Next Door is here visiting and she brought nothing but herself.. The Spring is getting closer and gives me inspiration for showing new models in full bloom soon.
A great idea, Now that you live so near tulip country you can work the lovely spring blossoms into a shoot or two. The Tulip season is nearing and when the fields are in bloom it is simply spectacular. The people of holland have pretty open minds about things sexual.
you're right hipshot, and I am REALLY looking forward to it. New lovely additions in new inspiring settings may be coming this year.
Which means I will be looking forward to it also!
Oh,Gosh,what am I seeing?
Two DG appearances in a row,two splendid sets,with Nici Dee yesterday,and featuring the super-cute,amazing Vanessa Angel today?
Can´t believe it,bro.From the first picture,I was sold.
As Stardust would say,"request more,return often"
You´re too hard to find,manThe Seller
Yes The Seller, it'd doesn't even feel real... Twice in a row with two of my favorite models.. It should happen more often!
I can see from your inspired poetry that you were really touched by this appearance... and Vanessa may really come back soon, another sensual set is waiting already...
If I am correct this set like Niki’s comes from June of 2014 and the story behind it is very touching so I will let Delta share what he is comfortable with you. This is her 13 set on MetArt and so far Delta and Ken Tavos have hidden her away for tne other artist. Delta also has her 4 sets on SexArt to his credit.
All correct Frank/swplf2. I expanded on the background story in my post.
It's nice that Vanessa has only agreed to shoot with me and my friend Ken Tavos, as I wrote she really needs to be comfortable and trust the photographer.
I have several other sets for Metart and also a few ones for Sexart with Vanessa, I am working on them these days so hopefully you will all be enjoying her again in one month or so if K agrees.
Vanessa always looks great, but I find this set to be a bit bland colorwise. Even the regular shots look like they have been desaturated.
Agree. The lighting is terrible and the photos are washed out.
It's agreeable Dark Storm, in effect given the overall blandness of the setting and the mood, when doing the post-production I went in the direction of emphasizing the flat tone range of the colors with a little bit colder white balance instead of increasing the saturation or warmth. That was the peculiarity I wanted the set to have, but I reckon it may result in something not so much appreciated. It's a matter of choices, you know, therefore they mat be not always liked. But I appreciate the fact you expressed a fair (and agreeable, indeed) opinion which shows how attentively you look at the images.
DG - In the world of erotic photography, colder is rarely better. Passion is hot & steamy! ;-)
It didn't help your cause that this set is posted right next to Matiss' color saturated & vibrant "Ysina" set of Fernanda. Going from viewing that set to this one is quite a shock to the viewer's sensibilities.
NOT MY STANDARD POST!
The name of this site is MET ART. Art by one definition is “Art is to create an emotional response in the person that is exposed to that art.” Most comments here are just that emotional responses to what the member has observed. The majority of commentators even if they do not add IMO would admit that what they write is their individual opinion. An opinion by definition is a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge. Since opinions are personal there is no absolute right or wrong they are just how you alone feel or respond to the art. The comments/opinions shared here reflect on both the model and artist and should be based on the set presented by them together. Too often the comments here are not based on photos from the set, but are a reflections of personal bias only peripherally related to them, the actual pictures. Not because you overall despise the artist or in some cases, very few, the model. The whole idea of a comment section it to share your individual opinion with others.
There is no election next week, here, your vote counts today whether you shared your opinion or not. Your opinion will not change mine, probably. Thus I try to do two things with my posts, first give real facts about the model and yes Artist as best I can. Thus the “historical” part. If I add my subjective opinion about the set it will normally be marled IMO. The management of MET ART allows all paying member a vast latitude on what they may say and how they vote even if there is no thought or reason other than the warped ego of the poster/voter. Voting a 1, one minute after the set drops precludes the fact that the voter even viewed the set. While I feel that is an abuse it is allowed. While an effort is made to “protect” the models in the comments, for the most part Artist are fair game. While hotte seems to be on a quest to see where that limit truly is, seldom is he reigned in. So let’s all wait and see how far he/she/it (Not sure which?) pushes it today. Give us your best shot we all could use a good laugh at your expense again today. At least you keep it from being boring. May you continue to enjoy playing the role of the ass, or as Rose would say arse. i.e. a stupid or annoying person. But as we all know that is just IMO.
Excellent. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. If I don't like the Mona Lisa it doesn't meant the painting is bad. DeltaGamma is actually one of my favorite MetArt photogs and Vanessa is one of the most gorgeous women on the planet, effortlessly stunning. That said, honest feedback can be useful to any artist even though the artist is under no obligation to agree with it.
Frankly Swplf2, I wouldn't waste so much time to to say "ass" (or arse) to an "ass" (or arse.) . Instead I would enjoy most beautiful girls , being grateful for sharing their hearts and proudly their beauties. This platform is a medium of exchange among the jewellers. Some of us is in the color, some of us is in the purity... some of us is after most beautiful eyes, some of us sweetest nose... in the end this is where beauty of woman and womanhood presented and appreciated. Pity for those who can not appreciate masterpiece of creation.
Frank, you're quite right, everyone is entitled to share their opinion, and all views are welcomed here, whether or not the majority shares them. I don't like to see one member being singled out for criticism by others for voicing their opinions (however unpopular), though. If K feels a need for someone to be "reigned in" she will do so.
MY 2ND NON STANDARD POST IN ONE DAY! DAMN!
Ok! This is Frank, that swplf guy is back in the closet of pseudonyms and nom de blumes, thanks to who? There is no profiles on MetArt of members and unless a member shares we actually know nothing about the posters. Yes I am an old fart, yes a friend of Deltagamma, (Not only here), an attorney, (Which many consider the biggest asses.), a long winded writer of erotic fiction, and sometimes posts her, opinionated, and yes as I admitted two weeks ago a “gadfly” (an annoying person, especially one who provokes others into action by criticism.) . I have defended in real life as well as having been a prosecutor and old habits die hard. My statistics proved K does her job extremely well and that was not an IMO but a fact backed by year long statistics. That fact did not keep me from making, unfounded allegation which she addresses, IMO, successfully. I thought I could become a recovering “gadfly”. Then hotte, hotte, and hotte again. So I relapsed. (If you are not aware of this you may click on the heading part of a comment, e.g swplf2, and ALL of the comments by that member pop up.) I did that for hotte and several things became clear. One he seldom if ever admits that his post are In His OPINION! He has a pattern of personal attacks on DeltaGamma and a couple of his other “hated” artists, and anyone, members, who dares to like those artist he hates. As the gadfly I have been chided by Rose, K, and even Jon on SexArt. And over the “1" issue even by my “friends”. MetArt Tech hates me, over errors they have made and I exposed, and have even threatened me personally. Today I must disagree with Rose. She says that “ and all views are welcomed here”. NO,NO! All views are tolerated only! NOT welcomed by the members anyway. It is a weekend so I hope K is off enjoying a respite as we suffer through another hotte rant. If our den mother’s (Rose) chiding has no effect which is apparently a “fact” not an opinion. Maybe she feels hotte attacks are misdemeanors and not felonies. IMO we have an expression in the Law to describe him other than ass. Its called “ Habitual Offender!” I can make a case that his rants peak about Deltagamma and his followers. And while he is Artist and a big boy who can defend himself as we see today and yesterday, Think about the damage he has done to the innocents the models how if you forget he even attacked yesterday for “allowing” that Deltagamma to shot them. Again IMO that was felonious. One of my most beloved professors in Law School also had an expression for this crap. “The sideshow is overtaking the circus!” So no more sideshow please!
Frank, if you scroll down, you will see I have given the member in question a warning over his behavior. That does not excuse yours. Once again I would ask that you allow K to deal with other members' behavior if and when she sees fit, and not continue to add fuel to the fire.
Quod est super! As I said "So no more sideshow please!" The gadfly is back in recovery....
It's not a matter of voicing opinions with this problem child, Rose, it's the insulting manner in which he voices them. It's not even constructive criticism, it's just basically "this sucks, the artist sucks, you all suck for liking it, this comment section sucks. Blue pills! Limp dicks! Prick clique!" He's making this place a less pleasant place to be.
That's something that K will address if and when she sees fit, but I don't think 'calling out' one member in a negative way is necessary or helpful. To be fair this particular member, while he may be generally insulting, he does not address his remarks to specific members by name. Let's play nice, please.
Rose, May I point out he has, and did today address a member by name (Checkers).
Yes, he did after everyone weighed in against him, and you will see I have given him a warning about his behavior. Can we all just try to get along, please!
The MetArt network uses your email address to send you more information about our products/services, events, news and offers.
You can unsubscribe at any time by using the unsubscribe link located in our emails we send you.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2018 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.