I think this model is beautiful and not used properly in these sets. Very little sexy poses, far too many sets underexposed, grainy. Why she wasn't done in brightly lit rooms to show off her body fully. Too many shots of her partially clothed. Poor photography.
actually to be honest this is a style I miss from met art. A lot of new stuff is sometimes overly glamor focused. These types of photoshoots have more creativity, and are sexy in there own way. fully exposed poses arent the only thing that make a woman sexy, and are overdone too much. What ever happened to the photographer focusing on the overall beauty of the model, not closups etc.
I agree, the name is MetArt. I think each should be judged on its merits and to compare the artistic with the mundane, the artistic always will stand the test of time. A partial nude leaves some intrigue and is far more erotic.
The MetArt network uses your email address to send you more information about our products/services, events, news and offers.
You can unsubscribe at any time by using the unsubscribe link located in our emails we send you.
Email newsletters can be blocked or filtered into bulk, spam or
marketing folders. As a result, you may miss email communications
To avoid this, add our email addresses to your safe sender’s List by
adding us to your email contacts.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2018 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.