There's either an inconsistent white balance, or change of saturation between photos in this set which is really distracting, when I click through the set. For example, 11 is neutral to slightly warn, 12 and 13 are cold and almost steely grey. Not sure if it's deliberate but it really detracts from the quality, for me.
Otherwise, quite a lovely set showcasing her athletic form very nicely in simple light and plain background.
I'm very late commenting on this set, I realise, but I download them and fall behind on checking them out in detail!
Beautiful model. Shocking photography, if you can even call it that.
Marlene, please go back to semi-retirement or wherever you were! Vittoria is way to beautiful for this kind of passive artistry. And why does she keep jumping around from one to the other. Stay with Rylsky okay.
With Marlene,the viewer is able to count the pixels in the image.
With Rylsky you´ll be able to count the Bartholino´s glands in their pussies.The Seller
Thought my monitor calibration had gone south- Gamma setting or, something terribly gone wrong! Nope just a photo shoot that maybe should have been rethought before publication......Anyway- there is no spoiling Vittoria's gorgeousness!
That's about as boring a set as I have seen on Met Art, diminishes the model and it's just plain uninspiring and BLAH.
Agreed. How many shots do we need of her just standing there?
So attractive and so sexy... She is playing Goddess in this set... excellent pictures...
Yay! A tried and true favorite of mine. I'm still trying to get back on RA and this is a good reason. Plus she's in the Petals volume, one of my favorites.Vittoria is lovely all over,I feel, and I'm so glad she is willing to share
Fabulous young lady .More please amazing.
This would be a great ad for the garment she's wearing. It's a scarf! It's a top! It's a belt! It's a cover-up!
OK, clearly the photographers haven't gotten the memo yet, but can we members agree that the "photograph a pale model against a bright/glowing white background" fad has long since run its course?
And I am no photographer or anything close to a photography expert, but even I can recognize grain when I see it and I really don't think you're supposed to see so much of it when you look at a photo under hi-rez.
Victoria is delightful as always and there are some really, really good shots of her lovely smile here, but for me this set is a fail.
Enough already with the glowing backgrounds, please...
I don't blame the background alone, I think the harsh direct lighting in front of her was an unfortunate choice. It washed out a lot of her skintone, and led to some weird shadows (see #77). Marlene can, and has, done better.
Funny thing ~ because I don't like outdoors sets as a rule ~ Marlene specializes in outdoors sets and I think those are her best.
I just dislike sets where the models are swallowed up in a white haze much more than I dislike outdoors sets.
Oh heavens, I said "Victoria." I'm sorry, Vittoria! Please come back really soon in a good set that showcases your beauty properly. ( :
My impression is Marlene attempted picture sharpening in photoshop or equivalent software and went too far.
Digital sharpening filters work by increasing contrast over the edges or transitions,often creating halos and all kinds or artifacts.
When applied to surfaces as the skin,it also reinforces the transitions between the pixels themselves,but there´s a parameter that allows for masking this horrible effect.
if it was applied with artistic intentions,that was an unfortunate choice.
But Vittoria looks fantastic anyway :)The Seller
Gold Russian Gem Vittoria!!!♥ ♥ ♥
When viewing the high res photos full screen, there is a terrible and very apparent graniness to the photos! I don't know if this was from an incorrect ISO setting, or some type of post-processing filter (hopefully not an intended "artistic effect"), but it is horrible! Ruined the set for me.
Vittoria is one of my favorite models, but this set was a disappointment!
I would agree with every word you wrote.
Me, too... I hate to write a negative review, but see my comment below...
Vittoria has an incredible, almost doll-like face, and a bangin' body! The style of the set is not particularly to my taste – I prefer real-life locations – but cannot deny this babe's hotness!
There is a saying “too much information”. The photographic equivalent would be “too much detail”. Is that what I am seeing here? Just asking. Vittoria is beautiful no matter which artist has presented her galleries or videos.
Vittoria has lovely long hair, beautiful eyes, part time pokies, an upper echelon navel, best in class camel toe (#18 or #85), a wonderful derriere when seen, a pleasing transition from waist to hips, and slender shapely legs.
This should have been a spectacular gallery; the model was there, the poses were flattering and interesting, but Flora's choice of technique did not wow me. Your mileage may differ.
Thank you to all three ladies who brought this visit to us.
3 Token spread shots and the very end like an after thought. Not erotic, a tease set at best.
Still not a fan of white backgrounds. They make the models look too pale.
I do agree but this girl is just stunning .
...yes, when we can see her...
I joined met Art to see beautiful ,naked,classy women.This photoshoot fulfills all those requirements.Vittoria and Marlene are a great combination .This IS beauty,surely that is more than just pussy.She is a goddess ,feel privileged,10 all round.
With you all the way Ian. I LOVE the difference Marlene brings to MA. I LOVE this set. We can't all have 10s four sets a day every day. Please K and most of all Marlene, don't be discouraged by the tirades above. Thanks Vittoria for sharing yourself in this imaginative way!
Good on you jolly,variety is the spice of life!This is one really beautiful woman and just because there is not a plethora of pussy shots Vittoria is sitting on 8.Members should appreciate beauty not just pussy,great job Marlene.
What a pointless and unerotic set of the most beautiful woman on MetArt. Back to the earlier ones for consolation.. 😯
Where did you get that little face? Do they have one that is blushing?
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2018 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.