Each photographer has his/her own style, and look overall, evoking a different reaction and mood from the model as well...
It would be nice to see Angelika shot by Arkisi, or one of the brighter, snappier photogs like Matiss, Varin, or Koenart...
Sunday, February 1st, 2015 on Espai
Thanks to Paramanov for finally submitting a set of Angelika without all the attendant goofiness of her prior sets.
She is stunning, as always. Nice to see her without distractions...
11 is a little generous for photos that arent in focus, dont you think???
Saturday, January 31st, 2015 on Akena
thank you, sir...
Monday, January 26th, 2015 on Soleca
Well, yes, I can be specific. 'Skin tones are OK' Youre kidding, right?
Look at the 100 or so photos where Leo shot Mia against the brightly lit background, and the 20 or so where he did not. Notice anything?
Oh, you mean Mia's got a nice tan in the 20 images where she's shot with a cropped background, and she looks like she's an albino in the 100 images where she's shot against the background. I mean, dont get me wrong, I LOVE Mia D, she's easily in my all-time top 10 models. But these pictures are awful. If Id submitted these images, my editor would have laughed at me and asked if enjoyed the rest of the picnic, becuase thats what they look like, is photos that somebody shot on a point and shoot, with no knowledge of lighting at all. So yes, as a professional photographer, I grasp that the overall exposure has to be a compromise between the subject, foreground, and background. However, if upon composing your image you discover that the overall difference in proper exposure of shadow values versus highlight values exceeds the dynamic range of the medium(about 7-9 stops in digital photography, 10-11 in larger format B&W films), you either re-compose the image, or shoot an exposure which compromises at one end of the spectrum. Look at the backgrounds of the photos shot away from the sun, versus into it. There's not a hole hell of a lot of difference. Its a pretty lake, one side looks a hole lot like the other. Leo clearly wasnt aware that his lighting ratio was at least 3 stops beyond his mediums ability to record, because he would have said "shit, my models gonna turn out WAY too bright, maybe I better shoot the other way." Instead, he shot 80% of his images directly into the sunny side of the sky, and burned them out. I cant fairly say, maybe theres an ugly sausage factory on the sunset side of the lake he needed to exclude from the images. But, looking at the very few shot with the sunset side of the lake, it looks pretty much the same. Simple problem, simple solution-shoot the other way...
Yes, I LOVE Mia, but how in the hell can you rate this set as 10?????
The exposure is absolutely DREADFUL in more than half of these photos...
And not just bad, terrible...
It seems many viewers on this site possess absolutely zero ability to evaluate photography. Yes, she's absolutely gorgeous, and overall, I like Leo's work, but this set is WAY subpar in its execution...
lucy looks SO much better without bleached nipples!
i hope those few models who still think this bizarre habit is sexy take note!
Please...NO MORE BLEACH
Saturday, January 24th, 2015 on Ricale
dats right boys, its tasty titty day here on Met-Art!!!
Wednesday, January 21st, 2015 on Lamerm
i would very much like to slather some slippery, sticky delicious substance all over Ledina's outstanding tits, and take my sweet time licking off every last bit...
just wanted to share that..
Wednesday, January 21st, 2015 on Requia
Getting off work at 2am sucks, but turning on the computer to find Zola's tight little pussy and asshole in hi-def does take the edge off a bit...
My oh My...
Wednesday, January 21st, 2015 on Presenting Zola
I too have over 20 years rooted in professional photography, and particularly, photo editing. If you took the care to read my comment, you would note that I stated that while I felt Rylsky's work OVERALL was poorly processed, that I felt this set was actually above average for him. Although the images are slightly overexposed(midtones and highlights both shifted slightly higher) and that overall images were low contrast, compared to some of his other work, these images are actually fairly decent. As an example, I would call your attention to almost any set of Rylsky's with Jeff Milton. In all these sets, almost every image has some portion of highlight detail which has been shifted to the point of having no detail remaining at all-completely burned out. Generally, these sets also have unusually low contrast and saturation as well. I would call your attention to 'Presenting-Dennie' from a few months ago. Overall contrast has been reduced by at least 3 stops, and almost all images have large areas which are completely devoid of detail in the highlight tones. As I have stated, I have been in the business of editing images digitally for the last ten years, and I honestly have no idea what processing algorithm Rylsky uses to give his images his signature 'look', but whatever it is, it renders most of his images in a caricature style which is a very poor depiction of his models, which is shameful, as he shoots some of the most beautiful women in the world...
Friday, January 16th, 2015 on Piasto
I cant understand why Sunshines sets get such a low rating...
Will someone who's giving this woman a rating of one please step up and
explain exactly what flaws they see here, because i dont see any...
Friday, January 16th, 2015 on Derima
Thank god there is at least 1 other viewer who agrees with me on this!
Although it's ok (and JUST ok) here, Rylsky's post processing is utterly atrocious on the whole. His images are so processed that they have an overexposed, flat, lifeless look. I love the comic book observation- so true. While the models he uses are wonderful, overall, I think his work is generally quite awful. It's refreshing to see I am not all alone on this one...
Yeah, she's nude at the end, after 100+ pics, for a grand total of maybe a dozen shots. Yes, I looked at the whole set
Thursday, January 15th, 2015 on Piasto
Im not disagreeing, bottomless makes a fine warm-up. Its a great lead-in for a fully nude model. The anticipation factor is great. But, after four sets, the milk in my cupboard is pretty well curdled.
For hells sake, just let us see this girl nude, full body, with no distractions, adornments, clothing, or other BS...
Gorgeous model, in a pretty boring set. Far too much repetition in poses.
Thursday, January 15th, 2015 on Foxen
Hate to disagree with both of you, but after 4 sets of almost all 'bottomless' with Vikki, I'm pretty much over it. Can I get a 'hooray for complete nudity'?
Her belly and breasts NEVER seem to get fair treatment from Rylsky, which sucks, as they are WONDERFUL!
I completely agree with the other posters, who are disappointed with the posing in this set. I don't know if it's Rylsky or Vikki who's decided that because her breasts are small, nobody is going to want to see them, but, after 4 sets, it's clear somebody doest want the viewer to see them. That's bullshit!
Vikki's petite body is perfect. Yes, she does have a great little ass, and a gorgeous pussy. But her breasts are adorable too. Show her nude for more than a handful of photos, for god's sake.
Pretty face, gorgeous eyes and smile, and a body to DIE for!
Love the tan lines, too!
Sunday, January 11th, 2015 on Zonie
careful who's tummy you message around here...
folks could get to talkin...
Friday, January 9th, 2015 on Presenting Tirata
While I LOVE the variety of body types our models have here, I subscribe because MA posts alot of sets with gorgeous petite women. Nothing gets me going like a woman with a smaller frame and perfect A-cup(American thing-really small boobs) breasts. So, obviously, this gal drives me crazy!
AV seems to find incredible models, and his camera work is stellar. I think the exposure in this set is perfect. Overall, most sets on this site are overexposed. AV nails it here. Midrange tones are perfect. Shadows are a bit more prominent, which could have been minimized with a little more overhead fill, but it creates a candid mood.
And the model...
I'm torn on the new Miela/old Miela debate...
It's obvious she's definitely been working out lately. The definition in her legs is impressive. While I think that her body looks absolutely incredible, I do think that slimming down has given her a bit of a stern look facially. Her face is much more angular, with her cheek bones more prominent. Her face still rounds out nicely when she smiles, though.
I'm glad she's in shspe, hopefully this gives her reason to smile, which would be good, because the sultry look is a little severe now.
Friday, January 9th, 2015 on Lytebe
I really don't care for sets that are two different locations, like this one. It is essentially like the photographer is telling his audience 'well, I couldn't take enough satisfactory pictures in either of these locations to fit the MA format, so here's two at once' Carolizi is absolutely incredible, she deserves to be shot with more continuity and care.
Thursday, January 8th, 2015 on Tixi
And very nicely done...
I look forward to upcoming sets with Vanessa, as she is truly something very, very special!
Wednesday, January 7th, 2015 on Asimila
you and i are just two peas in a pod...
i imagine most folks here would love to banish us to some virtual desert island(maybe Hegre Art)
Vanessa is one of my favorite models here, and DG is always one of my favorite photogs as well. That said, this is probably my least favorite set from this combo thus far. Vanessa's appeal(at least for me, anyway) comes from her innocence, and 'girl next door' look. IMO, in this set, she's wearing a bit too much makeup for me, which is accentuated by the somewhat harsh lighting(high contrast lighting ratio+oil based makeup="shiny" look)
I know that Im in the minority here, but Id much rather see a model like Vanessa shot in a way that highlights her "fresh" look than dolled up and in a period setting, wearing a corset.
Just my preferences...
yep...i have been traumatized by 'overbush' after dating a lovely gal from Costa Rica for a while, who had an unshorn sheep 'tween her legs. I had to tie a rope around my ankle, and lash it to the bedpost, so if I went down on her, I could find my way back to the bedroom...
sends shivers up my spine just talking about it...
Sunday, January 4th, 2015 on Enasus
youre a funny guy, there mistah...
i actually thought you were serious for a half a second there...
Sunday, January 4th, 2015 on Depiu
Yep, Mikhail Paramanov, if memory serves...
As I recall, the genre which seems to be all we see from this fella lately is his 'Fairy Tale' series. I personally do not equate being prolifically distributed or financially successful with whether or not an artist's work has merit. By that token, you could pick any bullshit top 40 hit off the charts, and the 'artist' who produced it would be a more 'successful artist' than any of the photographers posting here. My qualms are with anyone who touts the skill level of a photographer who's work includes glaring technical inadequacies such as consistent lack of focus. In my mind, this speaks more of the populous, whether that be posters on this forum, editors and viewers on other sites, or private individuals. In my mind, if standards have declined in this medium to such a degree that an 'accomplished artist' is one who doesnt even bother to focus his or her photographs correctly, then, irrespective of whether they are commercially successful, we have missed the boat. I choose not to even debate the matter of Paramanov's 'style' in his 'fairy tale' series, which is the fare we are now so commonly subjected to. Thats purely subjective-I personally find it insulting to the viewer, and depersonalizing to the models, but as Ive stated previously, if you like your erotica infused with a double-dose of make-believe, knock yourself out. Just dont try to tell me that the guy who shot it is a 'great artist' when he cant even focus his photographs.
Her name certainly is no mistake!
AV has the pleasure and distinction of photographing some exceptionally beautiful women. I can easily see how this one would make the man behind the camera sigh, take a deep breath, and think 'THIS is why I do what I do'
Muse is simply magnificent!!!
Everything about her is at the same time regal and sensual.
Sunday, January 4th, 2015 on Endela
Well, Arkisi, you have raised the bar here...
This set shows true mastery of the medium, in every sense of the word.
Sunday, January 4th, 2015 on Padou
That'd be easy just get a different photographer.
Paramov's a joke!
Saturday, January 3rd, 2015 on Depiu
Well, I think he just sucks, that's all.
If he actually had the balls to ever poke his head into this forum, perhaps we could ask him.
I tend to disagree. I think the key word in this sentence is 'almost' I know Paramov is all the rage because of his unique style, and debating that one is pointless. It's purely subjective, and while it makes my skin crawl, to each his own. If erotica for you is best when infused with a HUGE helping of make-believe, knock yourself out. The fact remains that Paramov's technical skills are WAY below par for this site. At least he finally figured out skin tones; the first few sets of Angelika she was abysmally overexposed. However, he shows no real understanding of depth of field, with respect to isolating elements in the photo for emphasis. I don't think he could ever actually master this technique, as he seems unable to focus at all. Seriously, a modern SLR makes it pretty difficult to shoot a photo out of focus.
In a word, no...
I agree that set doesn't work. I'm surprised Arkisi went for the 'Charlie and the Chocolate Factory' look.
Kika does look good though, huh?
Saturday, January 3rd, 2015 on Ajandi
I do wish we got more sets that rode the middle ground on the great bush debate. I think Loreen trims it up perfectly. I grew up back in the 70's when the bald look was unheard of. Sets like this are nice, where the model has public hair, but it's not the huge mat of thick hair that finds its way out to the upper thighs. That has always been, and will always be a turn-off.
Saturday, January 3rd, 2015 on Enasus
I still weep over those tats!
Sometimes I do enjoy ink on women, but those bows are awful. I've been bracing myself for whether or not MA is gonna demand those be edited out to publish her sets. She has always been a fave of mine, but those tats are a HUGE minus...
Saturday, January 3rd, 2015 on Mudelie
I have to admit I didn't examine this set too closely when it came out a few days ago. I've been traveling, so MA has been on the mobile screen.
I finally got to check this one out today. I'm usually not the biggest fan of outdoor sets. For me, few things are sexier than a gorgeous woman nude in bed. Maybe it's just the context I enjoy...
Regardless, I really can't remember Nancy ever looking better. The lighting is fantastic, and she is simply extraordinary.
Friday, January 2nd, 2015 on Nisieers
Yep...beats the hell out of the landing strip any day!
I would LOVED to see a dozen more shots of her in just those panties. So gorgeous!
Hooray for toplessness?
Friday, January 2nd, 2015 on Cheaco
I agree that a pussy as gorgeous as Assoli's certainly needs no adornment. Maybe Offlin was so impressed by it that he felt obligated to crown it as the reigning queen of pussydom???
It's certainly no secret that I don't care for Paromov. His weak technical skill and over the top theatrical style just don't work for me. I would love to see Angelika shot by Matiss, AC, or Koenart. She is simply stunning. However, she seems content with Paramov's style, and enjoys herself.
I'm certainly not gonna knock her choice, as she is clearly comfortable with her photographer...
Is that too much to ask???
Friday, January 2nd, 2015 on Depiu
For the love of god...
Give us back her nipple piercings!
She's already a 10 in my book, so I guess that would take her up to 11!
Pretty please, cherry on top...
Thursday, January 1st, 2015 on Karolina Young
While I admit that I subscribe to MA for the tight, petite Eastern European women that appear here with shocking regularity, I have to admit that there is always room in my book for Sofi. She has always made curvaceous more appealing than any other model here. Maybe it's her dance background, that has always kept her toned and flexible. Maybe it's that her personality is fun, as well as sexy, and that it always shines through. Or maybe it's just that she's goddammed smoking hot...
I dunno, but there can never be too many Sofi sets on my HD
Thursday, January 1st, 2015 on Amento
Never seems like Anna Lee invests alot of emotion in her sets, just sticking with the very basic sultry sex goddess expression. Not that it's a huge liability, just would be nice to have a little variety. Honestly though, with a body as utterly incredible as hers, I'd still probably rate a set with her wearing a Richard Nixon mask at least an 8, provided that was all she was wearing. Tight, toned, with simply perfect breasts(minus the two toned nipples-why do so many women here bleach, it befuddles me)
Thursday, January 1st, 2015 on Melinsi
I can only hope that Rylsky's new years resolution was 'In 2015, I will faithfully render ALL skin tones, preserving highlight detail in all sets.'
Nikia is wonderful, as always, and Rylsky's done a fine job with the lights, without going wild on posts hot editing.
Thanks both for a fine set!
Thursday, January 1st, 2015 on Lemiz
Well, here's my thoughts...
I imagine that auto insurance must be ungodly expensive.
That surmise is do to the fact that I just can't imagine that with women as utterly perfect as those featured here from that nation just walking around at large, that the accident rate must be through the roof!!!
Great work by AC, too.
Thursday, January 1st, 2015 on Presenting Lupita
Bring her back!
Please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please
Bring her back!
It's been 3 months. Please tell me me shot more than one set, or that you are willing to kidnap her and shoot more for us.
Amarna is a 12.5 on a scale of 1 to 10.
Wednesday, December 31st, 2014 on Presenting Amarna Miller
Love the micro-bush!!!
Wednesday, December 31st, 2014 on Nisieers
Priceless!!!I agree that when the bush migrates out to the upper thighs, it's a turn-off...
Monday, December 29th, 2014 on Relatre
I cannot believe I am only the second person to comment on Brandi!!!
What the hell is wrong with you people!
She definitely makes my list of top 3 new models this year! Gorgeous girl next door good looks, simply perfect body, wonderful smile. I don't know what it is that users here are looking for, but if Brandi isn't it, then count me out...
Monday, December 29th, 2014 on Brandi A
I can't believe Brandi doesn't get higher ratings, or better comments. IMO, she's one of the hottest newcomers this year. Gorgeous face, absolutely perfect(and, omg, I do mean that literally! ) tits. She's certainly not the least bit shy showing off her body as well.
Hoping for many, many happy returns!
Monday, December 29th, 2014 on Pacoma
Irina is just smoking in this set...
I'm braced for the 20 comments about public hair that will ensue...
For hells sake, let the girls decide how they are gonna tend the lawn!
I definitely prefer the smooth architecture of a shaven pussy, but I'd shower that gorgeous set of lips with hours of attention, whatever it's attire!
I hate to slam Leonardo, who's stuff I usually enjoy very much, but poor execution definitely mars this set. Overexposure gives a lot of the images a dull, flat look, and a lot of the images aren't focused correctly. I really don't care for the 'pose the model next to a horribly bright window' theme, which seems to pop up far too often these days.
Yarina, however, pretty much transcends the less than perfect camera work. Great connection to the camera and viewer, and a smoking hot body. Perfect breasts, and a showstopper ass...
Monday, December 29th, 2014 on Rimane
I thought when she started out posing that nothing could be sexier than Colleen's akward, shy disposition. Seems like every time out, she's gotten a little more comfortable, and this set appears to be a quantum leap in that direction. Throughout this set, she glows with a radiant charm I haven't seen from her before. Utterly captivating. And her body is just to die for, as always. I absolutely love her puffy nipples, full hips and ass, and her luscious pussy has to be my all-time favorite.
Monday, December 29th, 2014 on Diffone
I know your feelings on these costume epics. I think I've taken up your mantle in terms of stirring the pot and inciting opinions in a divisive way. But, the 'live and let live' posts here today seem to be getting far more thumbs up than my tantrum this morning, though it does warm my heart to see a few folks comment on my 'turd' analogy.
Friday, December 26th, 2014 on Rhodi
Well, as I stated, seems like the overall opinion of this forum is that this set is worthwhile. I applaud the editors resolve in continuing to post material from a photographer who consistently racks up more negative comments than all other photographers combined, and has never produced a single set which received a rating of over 9, indicating that it universally pleased the viewership here.
I appreciate your remarks, and your own tastes in the material presented here. In particular, one word jumps out at me...'accessories' This is one thing that I personally do not care for at all, and find immensely distracting. Obviously, in the context of a set like this one, nothing is likely to bring me to a point of appreciating this. However, I'm very curious how the addition of a large necklace or some other acessory enhances a set you. I hope that the fact that I've asked in a respectful manner will prompt an open and genuine response, as I am very curious about this...
Well, another smoking turd of theatrics from Paramov's demented 'creative genius' never hurt anybody, I guess...
What puzzles me more that the fact that my network dues paid for this set is the fact that half the posts here are gonna praise this set as being fantastic. For me, that's truly incomprehensible.
To my eyes, this set is a close second to Paramov's 'Evanida' with Sabrina G for the esteemed position of worst ever posted here.
To those folks, you have the solace of knowing that you only have to endure my snarky bitching for another 6 weeks. For all the rest of you, who think that Paramov's stuff is simply awful, perhaps if enough folks cancel their memberships, K will get the message and stop buying this crap.
Thanks for the slack...
I did have a bad weekend. Monday was better, and Matiss shooting Vivian on the beach a few days ago more than cured me of my rancor towards MA lately.
My handle here was another autocorrect casualty. I was supposed to just be B-Man, a title which I picked up on a job many years ago, out of my overt appreciation for the feminine behind...
Wednesday, December 24th, 2014 on Presenting Loli
Damn auto correct.
Don't get into his stuff.
Yes, I do post to this forum on an iPhone
I'm glad some folks appreciate Paramov's style.
I recognize that these matters are subjective, so I feel obligated to chime in with a dissenting opinion. While this set is less busy than most of his other work, it still feels to me much more a celebration of Paramov's neo-Elizabethan vision than it is about the model. Which is a shame, as she is gorgeous.
Opinions are like assholes(and apparently I am one), but I just get into his stuff. To each his own, I suppose.
I see your point...
I harp too much on technical details, because women as beautiful as those presented here deserve to be presented with the highest degree of excellence. For me, though, I tend to draw a line in the sand over one simple factor, does the photo actually LOOK like the model. Case in point 95% of Rylsky's stuff in the last two years. He's processed the images so much, that his skin tones don't even look human. Look at Matiss, Koenart, Deltagamma they all use a very literal pallette, so their stuff LOOKS like the model. If you were lucky enough to be face to face with one of their models(damn, wouldn't THAT be sweet! I'd push my dear old mum in front of a train for coffee with Patritcy) and you held up one of their photos, they would be pretty much identical. My point is, I don't think I'm being overly technical, when I bitch about sets in which the photo not only doesn't look like the model, but actually doesn't look human at all. There's been quite a trend to overexposure here in the last year or two. It's a bummer when the finished product turns out with skin tones that don't look human.
Tuesday, December 23rd, 2014 on Qulpi
Vivian blew me away on her first set, and is even better this time around. Fresh, young face, with a warm connection to the camera and viewer. Lovely skin. And quite simply, a jaw dropping body. Full hips and small breasts is my all time favorite figure, and Vivian is simply perfect. I try to avoid 'the best' but at this point, I'm confident that, as I see it, she has the nicest ass on this site.
I don't usually dig beach sets, but I'm so taken by Vivian, this set could be shot on the moon, or at the DMV, I would still give it a 10.
And thank you to Matiss. Your work is flawless, as ever. It's refreshing to see a photographer who's style is celebrating the beauty of the model, with zero bs interjected.
Monday, December 22nd, 2014 on Tirova
As I recall, baggy was the one who instructed another user with criticism of the photographer to take his thumbs up(or down) and insert it in his ass. Pretty sure that's way outside Rose's realm of courtesy to each other
I jumped in, because frankly I'm tired of half-wits sticking up for shifty photography I'm paying good money for.
And, it seems, this forum has degraded just as much as the quality of work posted here of late.
Sunday, December 21st, 2014 on Presenting Stephanie
Wow, baggy calls someone who brings up a valid technical concern a jackass, and scores a point.
For realz, you disappoint me.
This forum exists for discussion of the material, not aggressive aggrandisement of the egos of the users.
I've mentioned Rylsky's horrible penchant for overexposure at least a dozen times in this forum. Not once has he replied. I've had numerous exchanges with other photographers here. Rylsky doesn't seem to give a damp enough to reply.
As for you and Baggy36, unless you care to discuss the relative merits of the sets or photographers noted, please don't waste my time...
Thank you, and good day...
Sorry jackass, but I totally agree.
Over the last couple years, Rylsky has totally lost the ability to create decent images. I'm not sure what algorithm he's using in his editing, but all his images are flat, washed out, and are so overexposed that there is zero highlight detail remaining. For models with darker skin tones, he just loses the highlights. For models like Stephanie, and Jeff Milton, pretty much all skin tones are burned off.
I don't care how gorgeous the model is, or how well she's posed, if the exposure of the image is awful, the image is gonna suck.
And these do.
Saturday, December 20th, 2014 on Presenting Stephanie
Of course it is...
He thinks overexposure is stylish.
Who needs highlights just burn em out!
Im a petite lover, myself. I will grant exceptions to that rule from time to time though. Marta E and Mila(oh, Mila!) both work for me, mostly because their breast, though large, are pretty much perfect. And because they are real. Augmented breasts just look fake to me. They are blatantly obvious, as they have that stretched tight, uneven. bottom-heavy look. Not to mention, they feel just as fake as they look, and they show that a model just doesnt have self-confidence.
So yeah, she's all yours- Ill stick to my all-natural petites...
Wednesday, December 17th, 2014 on Renle
Thanks for taking part in this forum. I think it definitely adds to the appreciation of the models to have a little background info(for me, anyway) In this case, I never would have guessed that the source of Sunshine's disconnection with the camera was her not feeling comfortable, or sexy in front of the camera. I assumed(as I guess many people have) that she was disinterested because she knew just how gorgeous she was, and was just bored with being adored and lusted after. I think most folks just never considered that she might have issues with confidence, considering that she is simply one of the most beautiful models here. She has a pretty face(probably prettier if she smiled more), and quite frankly, the sexiest body of any model here. I came to that conclusion in 'Sanoje'-that her body is simply divine.
I hope that she continues to become more comfortable, and also keeps sharing herself with us all-she is truly something very, very special
Wednesday, December 17th, 2014 on Siyane
I honestly think that Sunshine's ratings suffer because of her lack of emotion. Her expression really doesn't change at all. This creates a distance between her and the viewer. I think this is, oddly enough, reinforced by the fact that she'should so gorgeous.
Just my thoughts.
As I stated earlier, I'd love to see a more playful side of her get shot sometime.
Tuesday, December 16th, 2014 on Siyane
Sunshine's LONG legs definitely don't need any help from those shoes. IMO, they look kind of ridiculous on her, actually.
However, as always, she absolutely smolder with sexuality. Just once, I'd like to see a lighter set where she smiles and has fun with the camera. Seems like she always has her 'Sex goddess'
Which she certainly is...
While I agree that Zafira is a gorgeous woman, I really don't care for the porn star fake tits.
Just not my thing...
Tuesday, December 16th, 2014 on Renle
Jesus, I posted my comment before I even finished viewing the whole set...
The ass series...
Sunday, December 14th, 2014 on Subara
In her first few sets, I always felt that she was quite attractive, but there was always something that just didn't quite do it for me. In the last three, since she's gone back to her natural hair color, my appreciation of Monika has gone through the roof.
She is just gorgeous. Each set has been better than the last, and this one is just smoking!
Koenart absolutely nails it, and Monika is both totally comfortable and totally alluring at once.
Can't wait to see what's next!
Well, hopefully some of the other photog's who post their stuff here will see this set...
This is what it looks like when you actually have talent, and do something truly creative...
You can actually transcend the limitations of media, and venue, and produce erotic art, that captures the sensual essence of the female form, in such a way that celebrated the raw power there, without cheapening the model, the viewer, or yourself in the process...
Creativity is NOT another gaudy plastic neclace. It's NOT moody lighting and a bunch of stupid Elizabethan costumes and props. It's not extensive post-production processing of your images that makes your model's skin tones appear as white as a blank sheet of paper.
Alex has raised the bar here tonight.
Thanks for a great piece of work.
Maybe there's hope for MA yet...
Sunday, December 14th, 2014 on Dyuti
To tell you the truth, I never really noticed how conservative Marta's sets are. I've always been mesmerized by her lovely eyes, beautiful smile, and fantastic figure. Yes, as much as the next guy, I'd love to see what's hidden in that perfect slit, or see her doggy style. However, a dozen sets in, it's pretty obvious that she's not comfortable going there. I'd still much rather see her showing us what she will, with that radiant smile, than a model who spreads wide, with zero emotions.
Thursday, December 11th, 2014 on Mechti
I'm not a fan of piano sets, but image 49 could have been posed next to a pile of dead babies, and I'd still hang it on my wall. I never thought MA would find a woman with a more impressive body than the lovely Divina, but Matilda is just that. Her body is just remarkable. I can only imagine what pleasures would be in store for whatever lucky guy found his way into her bed!
I would have liked to see more pictures of her from behind, but hey, if this set had been 300 images long, it still would have been too short!
For God's sake, please, give us more!
Matilda, you are a Sex goddess!
Wednesday, December 10th, 2014 on Koeto
Katy D, you are the sexiest, most beautiful woman on this website!
Please come back!
Monday, December 8th, 2014 on Katy D
In a field of the most beautiful women in the world, Mila still stands out as exceptional.
Her smile, with those full, pouty lips would arrest any man, even if she was wearing a spacesuit. Fortunately for us, we see her wearing much less. Toned, long, athletic body. Absolutely perfect ass. Wonderful full tits, with amazingly sensual nipples.
And quite simply, the most arousing package I've ever seen huge clit, full, meaty labia, and the only woman I've ever seen with anal labia! Every time I see this woman, I fantasize about how my heart would truly stop for a bit if I was intimate with her, and pulled her panties down for the first time, to reveal the simply perfect majesty they covered up...
OH MY GOD!
Thank you Mila for sharing yourself, and thank you Matiss for perfectly capturing this most erotic woman ever.
Friday, December 5th, 2014 on Mila M
At this point, the one thing I find more disturbing than the overall decline of the photography on this site is the fact that the majority of souls who seem to frequent this forum seem to approve.
Gorgeous models, poorly lit, overexposed, and WAY overproduced.
This 'artistic' kick is awful. This site should be about the models. They are why we are here. In the last year or two, many photographers here have allowed their egos to balloon, intersecting far too much 'style' and detracting from the overall depiction of the model.
Monday, December 1st, 2014 on Mirine
Definitely one of my all-time favorite models...
Unconventional location, but we'll shot, with Mike a looking adorable as always.
Nice to see the bush growing back in...
Sunday, November 30th, 2014 on Basho
Well, my deepest sympathy goes out to Angelika, because her career as a nude model will suffer due to being shot exclusively by a no talent ass clown like Paromov. I know I will get hammered by all you folks out there on this one, by as the consumer here, I'm getting screwed here. This is what, the 4th or 5th set for this absolutely stunning model, but not a one has been truly enjoyable, due to the over the top heavyhanded theatrics of a woefully second rate photographer, who's insecurity leads home to overproduction.
I will not renew my membership when it comes up. I'm taking my money somewhere else...
Thanks, and goodnight
Sunday, November 30th, 2014 on Temezo
Ok, screw the Beach Boys...
I wish they all could be former Soviet girls!
Vivian is truly something special.
Beautiful face, innocent, but seductive. Flawless skin. Perfectly proportioned petite body, with full hips, jaw dropping ass, lovely small breasts, and a truly stunning coin slot pussy. All this topped off with a pleasant, uninhibited disposition, and a wonderful smile!
Met Art has proven beyond any doubt that Russia and the Ukraine are home to the most captivating women on the planet.
Saturday, November 22nd, 2014 on Vivian
As always, Patritcy is just spectacular!
I don't know if it's her smile, with those big bright eyes, or her absolutely SMOKING body, but whatever it is, it's working for me...I'd swim shark infested waters and climb Everest barefoot to plant my face between those long legs and devour the perfection that lies within!
Thanks for warming up a cold Alaskan day, Patritcy!
Monday, November 17th, 2014 on Kileq
Oh, it's a good day for those of us in the PP fan club!
Colleen is my all time favorite, with a pussy like a damn ice cream cone, and she looks incredible in today's set. And here we have newcomer Roberta, who knocks it out of the park with a perfect little coin slot twat she's not afraid to show off!
Ahhhhh, today is a good day!
Sunday, November 16th, 2014 on Presenting Roberta Berti
Nedda looks amazing in this set. It seems she has been working out; her ab's are much more definited than in previous sets. I like variety, and the unshaven look works very well for her, IMHO. Something about her face also just radiates sheer seductiveness on this one.
Would love to stumble on this while out for a stroll...
Wednesday, November 5th, 2014 on Equrie
This set looks like sh*t.
I don't know what Catherine does these days, but all new sets seem to have a very unflattering grain structure at high resolution. Additionally, the strong back light of the window, paired with relatively undiffused frontal strobes creates a very flat look, which is also very washed out.
Beautiful model, I do like Catherine's style these days, with very stark women, but poorly executed.
I know many of you out there in the forum are probably tired of my posts. Don't worry, only a few more weeks, you won't have to read them. I'm taking my money elsewhere.
MA still has the most beautiful women in the world, but these days, the photography is all too frequently just terrible.
Wednesday, November 5th, 2014 on Presenting Lenina
Damn, I forgot just how cute and sexy Lilu was from when she did her ED set!
Monday, November 3rd, 2014 on Presenting Lilu
Please tell me we are going to see more of this beautiful woman
I can't believe it's been 3 months and we haven't seen her again
Sunday, November 2nd, 2014 on Doreen
this is Malinda's best set.
She is just stunning!
Friday, October 31st, 2014 on Taradys
Thank you for this set. It has become a rarity to see a set here in which the photographer chooses to portray the model exactly as she is, instead of heavyhandedly
expressing his 'creative vision' with grossly altered exposure, tonal balance, etc.
I have decided to allow my membership to lapse when it comes for renewal next month.
I will miss sets like this, in which a truly stunning model is perfectly presented, but, in my opinion, sets such as this have become very rare here, with the norm being far below MA's historically high standard.
Friday, October 31st, 2014 on Carreta
I keep hoping the big, gaudy necklace fad will blow over. It takes away from the connection of the model to the surroundings, at least for me.
What are everybody else's thought on that one?
Thursday, October 23rd, 2014 on Rinute
Tuesday, October 21st, 2014 on Presenting Carolizi
Hey, look, another Rylsky set with a gorgeous model who's overexposed in half the photos.
This gets very tiring indeed...
Tuesday, October 21st, 2014 on Ticula
It's funny to me that many are grousing about exposure on this set. It's a little washed out, but not bad. It's odd to me that nobody ever mentions exposure on some of the sets that are, in my opinion, just horrible. It seems in the last year, Rylsky has gone off the deep end. He burns out pale skinned models to a dreadful degree. I can't think of a single Jeff M set in which highlight detail isn't totally fried. Overall, this seems to be a disturbing trend with several of the photographers here. They intentionally position the model next to a window, creating a lighting ratio that no camera could possibly capture, without leaving the highlights as vast chunks of burned out, detail-less white. There is nothing sexy, or artistic about this. It's just poor photography. Plain and simple. I absolutely love the models here, but I feel like technical standards have gone to hell in the last couple years. As it is, maybe one set in ten that I download here makes it on to my hard drive without first taking a trip through photo shop to clean up poor exposure/tonal balance.
I'm incredibly frustrated by this trend, and will very likely not renew my membership this year.
Monday, October 20th, 2014 on Sharie
I must admit, I usually prefer smaller breasts over bigger ones. Which works out great because MA definitely caters to guys like me very nicely indeed.
That said, plain and simple, Isabelle has a fantastic pair of tits!
She definitely refutes my 'more than a mouthful is a waste' rule!
Monday, October 20th, 2014 on Teraue
Check out her sets from Hegre. She has some really nice explicit stuff over there. 'Petals' does live up to its name...
Saturday, October 18th, 2014 on Agino
Jesus, what the hell is up with Rylsky these days. EVERY set he does is overexposed at least one full stop. Do you believe that models are sexier, somehow more pure, if you render their skin alabaster white???
You haven't accurately rendered Jeff even once. You utterly butchered Rafaella, and Dennie, now this travesty.
Buy a goddamned light meter...
Friday, October 17th, 2014 on Iterma
It looks like I'm gonna need a bigger hard drive.
Days like today make me realize the futility of trying to pick just ONE set to download. Why chose when I can have em all.
Another 500gb is still pretty cheap, right?
Definitely not passing this one up.
Sonnett is absolutely spectacular!
Friday, October 17th, 2014 on Presenting Sonnett
My user name was a damn you auto correct- it was supposed to be B Man, short for Butt Man, in honor of my appreciation of the human female ass. Dulcia gets full credit in this regard- what a gorgeous butt!!!
However, I couldn't help noticing the pretty face, beautiful tits, and amazing labia too.
I'd second the PP nomination...
Friday, October 17th, 2014 on Ineka
If, for some god awful reason, the folks at Met Art emailed me today saying, ok you only get to have sets from one model now, so who's it gonna be, there's no doubt in my mind...
She's never done a bad set, just good ones and great ones. Her body is, at least in my eye, simply perfect. Gorgeous legs. Phenomenonal ass. And the most perfect breasts I've ever seen. But what does it for me is the connection she has with the camera. In each and every shot, the expression on her face says,'I love what I'm doing, sharing my lovely body with you'
I doubt MA is going to make me choose one model, but if they do, I would pick Patritcy. I never tire of seeing her smile, and beautiful nude body...
Wednesday, October 15th, 2014 on Ekani
Just in case anybody is keeping track...
I find Dennie simply fantastic!
I prefer petite and athletic women. While I appreciate the beauty of some of the curvier women here(let's face it, variety is the spice of life, and MA is one of those places you CAN have it all) I'm still very thankful that you include women like Dennie here.
This site is incredible!
Monday, October 13th, 2014 on Presenting Dennie
Today's best, by far.
I usually don't care for Arkisi when it comes to exposure and tonal balance, but both are perfect here.
BY FAR, Mirens best set. This young woman absolutely smolders. So beautiful and sexy!
Monday, October 13th, 2014 on Cerea
I've been eagerly anticipating this set since it came on the guest page as a cover shot 23 hours ago...
I must say, I have never been more disappointed in a set before...
First and foremost, Skarlett is absolutely gorgeous. One of the most beautiful newcomers EVER. I will give credit that technically, this is a good set. Lighting and exposure are spot on, as usual for Koenarrt. Terrible, simply terrible choice of images though. Panties on until the fourth page? Not a single shot from behind in 120? I'm not gonna grouse about lack of close up shots down below on a debut, but seriously, this set is SO DISAPPOINTING.
Monday, October 13th, 2014 on Presenting Skarlett
It's a shame that this stunning woman is exclusively paired up with a very poor photographer. I suspect she would have been a HUGE sensation if she had been working with Rylsky or Arkisi.
Pair her up with someone who's technical skills and creative vision can match her beauty.
Friday, October 10th, 2014 on Angelika D
Simply the sexiest new model here in a long time. I hope we get many, many more sets of this truly stunning b beauty!
Thursday, October 9th, 2014 on Amarna Miller
Quality of the work is quite strong. I personally believe LH does some of the best work on the site. Composition is nicely varied, and highlights the phenomenonal figure(I love her body, I'm not gonna lie!).
I frequently bicker about exposure, with most photographers here tending to overexposure, with the complete loss of highlight details. In this regard, LH is spot on perfect. Lovely work...
For me, the public hair is just too much. It's so dark and thick that it arrests the eye, making it THE focus of attention. There's a reason that EVERY comment today has been in regards to that thick bush.
That's my take...
Luna was perhaps my favorite newcomer this year, and I preferred her clean-shaven.
Wednesday, October 8th, 2014 on Consome
Just to be fair, so that the folks at MA know the shave/no shave issue is in fact a toss up...
It's so disappointing to see a beautiful woman, who's one and only previous set revealed a truly fantastic set of labia sporting a bush so thick that she might as well be wearing panties...
Definitely not my preference, but I do respect the fact that our models are people, not objects, and that the decision is most definitely theirs to make.
That said, I'd much rather see a clean look, where the most titillating parts of the woman aren't hidden...
Just my preference.
I totally agree. The dress stays on way too long. I am perplexed by why Fabrice tends to cover up the breasts of petite women. Both Eva Jane and Connie seem to keep their tops on WAY too long in his sets. Since these incredible new models are both exclusively his shoots, it is terribly frustrating.
I think I am speaking for many of our viewers when I say that the petite, small breasts women of this site are the most beautiful on the net, and we want to see ALL of them...
Sunday, October 5th, 2014 on Valenthi
You have got to be f*%×!^@ kidding me!
I stopped complaining about the gaudy plastic jewelry that some of the less talented photographers here use to make up for creative talent. But seriously...
It is a shame that the most beautiful women in the world get mangled by utterly incompetent half wits like Paromov...
This set is simply the worst set. Period. And I don't just mean the worst set this 'photographer' has done, or even the worst set on this website.
It is, quite simply, the worst body of work in the history of erotica...
The fact that some of the viewers out there saw any merit in this set is DEEPLY DISTURBING.ABSOLUTELY AWFUL.
Friday, September 19th, 2014 on Evanida
why didnt we get more of this stunner????
are you kidding me???????
Tuesday, September 16th, 2014 on Evelin
how the hell did this one get passed by????
are you kidding me?
This woman is fantastic!
Tuesday, September 16th, 2014 on Lory
I personally enjoy this set more than any Zarina has done thus far.
I agree that the focus and framing arent Leo's best work, but I find other photographers tendency to totally obliterate highlight detail by often a full stop or more are far more of a detraction. Z's pale skin tone is exposed perfectly here....
And her gorgeous smile is hard to argue with here. Not to mention, those INCREDIBLE breasts and nipples(MY OH MY>>>>>>) have never looked better...
Thanks to Z and Leo for making my day!!!!!
Tuesday, September 9th, 2014 on Titoria
What a great set!
Connie is absolutely spectacular, and Fabrice does a GREAT job capturing that moment. Connie seems to be more comfortable sharing herself with the camera, after her debut set. Fabrice does a wonderful job letting her ease into this. I can only hope that we will see many, many more sets from this gorgeous young woman in the weeks and months to come...
Saturday, August 30th, 2014 on Vudille
Oh my god!
Images 18 and 19 may be the finest butt shots ever to grace this site!
Friday, August 22nd, 2014 on Grynse
please give us more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Saturday, August 16th, 2014 on Presenting Lory
Patritcy, you are absolute perfection!
The most beautiful woman alive!
Thank you for sharing your body and spirit with us all!!!
Friday, August 15th, 2014 on Penhud
What a debut!
A truly magnificent beauty, perfectly photographed...
In my eyes, it gets no better than this...
Saturday, August 2nd, 2014 on Presenting Doreen
On a site with THE most beautiful women in the world, Mika stands apart as one of the sexiest here, making her a strong choice as the most beautiful in the world.
I remember the chills I got the first time I saw her nude here years ago, and she's only gotten better with age.
Those long legs, perfect breasts and nipples, and stunning smile.
Mika, thanks for sharing your beauty with all of us here!
Sunday, July 27th, 2014 on Kumri
Nika is so fine!
Definitely the nicest breasts I've ever seen. ..
And the rest is fantastic too...
Friday, July 25th, 2014 on Gordete
Oh my god!
Malinda has hands down the sexiest labia on this planet!
Bubble gum lips!!!
Monday, July 21st, 2014 on Staroha
My favorite debut in a long time.
Mercedes is absolutely incredible!!!
Monday, July 21st, 2014 on Presenting Mercedes
Always a treat to see Patritcy nude on Met Art
Absolutely one of the most gorgeous women here, which says alot...
Thanks for sharing your perfect body and radiant spirit with us all here at Met Art!
Monday, July 7th, 2014 on Aparde
THAT...is one pretty pussy.
I think i may require defibrilation!!!
Monday, July 7th, 2014 on Presenting Karolina Young
God I love this girl!!!!
While her awkward shyness in the first couple sets was unbelievably erotic, its also remarkably appealing to see her gain some confidence, and develop a rapport with the camera.
And, of course, her body is SO tantalizing!
As always, its a pleasure to see her grace this site nude...
Sunday, July 6th, 2014 on Zeneko
Please more of this absolutely beautiful woman!
In my opinion, the most gorgeous one set beauty on this site!
Friday, July 4th, 2014 on Presenting Malta
Not the most exciting variety
Of poses, but the color balance and exposure are right on, which is SO RARE for MA anymore.
Can't wait to see this stunning woman again!
Friday, June 27th, 2014 on Ohico
Don't think there's really any competition in the PPP category...
Vittoria has the prettiest pussy on this site.
Sure doesn't hurt that she is drop dead gorgeous, with a perfect body and beautiful face too.
Thursday, June 19th, 2014 on Fermian
Highlight values are completely burned out.
Why in the name of God do almost all photographers on this site choose to do this.
Without a doubt, the most beautiful women on the planet, but the technical expertise shown in most sets has declined to almost unbearable levels.
Buy a damn light meter, and learn to use it!
Friday, June 13th, 2014 on Tesiri
Couldn't disagree more.
Maybe you are permanently damaged by too many lust encounters with overgrown waitresses from the seventies.
The clean look is where it's at these days. Sorry if you are intimidated by actually being able to see a woman's labia.
Thursday, June 12th, 2014 on Vietoje
what a great set!
Eliav's previous sets were good, her body is amazing, but she always had a
chilly, disconnected expression on her face that seemed to detract a little bit for me. This time around, she seems to have warmed up a bunch, and has a great rapport with the camera. This warmth really brings out the beauty of her face, and her body is, well, absolutely fantastic.
all in all, stunning stuff!!!!
I think you should have your eyes checked...
Those look like the same ABSOLUTELY STUNNING breasts Patrick has had all along.
All in all, definitely one of the sexiest bodies on this site!
Wednesday, June 4th, 2014 on Bantina
I have no argument that Met Art features the most beautiful women in the world. That's beyond argument. However, technical standards have dropped so low as to be almost unbearable. My issue is overexposure. Almost every set at this point is overexposed to the point that the key tone highlights are completely burned out. Did poor exposure control become stylish at some point along the way?
I have taken to cleaning 95% of the sets I download here in photoshop to correct poor exposure control and tonal balance, but when the photographer exposes so excessively that the top end highlights are lost, there isn't a damn thing you can do to correct it. Did you folks just skip any fundamentals of photography, or do you actually find burned out highlights appealing?
Sunday, May 18th, 2014 on Gostawa
Well, it's been over a month since this stunning beauty graced this site. I'm afraid that all the negative response scared her away. It's a shame, because, in my opinion, she was(is) one of the most beautiful women to appear in some years. Perhaps if all the naysayers had been a bit more supportive of her showing a bit more, despite her modesty, as stated in her comments, we might have seen another set. Instead, several people spouted off about the fact that there Met Art dues somehow entitled them to see each and every inch of a models body, in every set...
Friday, March 21st, 2014 on Kawaii
I'm not always the biggest fan of Arkisi's lifhting, but there's no way to argue the fact that he finds the most beautiful women in the world to photo. Colleen is no exception....
She is absolutely fantastic...
What an incredible body, and an innocent face that just drives me mad!
Sunday, March 9th, 2014 on Colleen A
I agree with your assessment of Russian and Ukraine girls in general and Vivian in particular, but I'm afraid she was born the year the Soviet Union collapsed, so I don't think I'd call her a former Soviet girl.
Because history. ;-)
Friday, August 21st, 2015 on Vivian
For the most part I totally agree with you, By man. Also, this is the second consecutive photo shoot by Leonardo with serious depth-of-field issues. The last one was an indoor photo shoot, so I gave him the benefit of the doubt that perhaps he's shooting medium format (which will have low DOF even at, say, F8), and may be impossible to light practically indoors well enough to set an F-stop high enough to get a decent DOF if he IS shooting medium (but on that last set -- Nancy, I think -- he choose to have HER FACE in focus on EVERY SINGLE SHOT, even when there were multiple consecutive shots that were very similar and they were "total body" shots. OK, so your model has a beautiful face. That doesn't mean it has to be IN FOCUS for every shot if that means the rest of her body is OUT OF FOCUS!
But on THIS shoot, even the shots where he had the sun shining ON his Mia (and it appears used NO additional lighting) his DOF was EXTREMELY shallow (to the point that her anus and her pussy weren't in focus at the same time, for instance, when no more than an inch separated them, distance-wise, from the lens). On the last "100," if that's what it was, yeah, it's obvious he's either shooting into the sun, or bright clouds with that lake and sky as an equally bright background and it's also pretty obvious that he HAD TO compensate by using using some flash to keep Mia illuminated enough on the front side. I think that threw off his white balance, and I'm guessing IF his camera has auto-white balance settings he wasn't using them and forgot to change his white balance from daylight to flash (although the color temperatures can be pretty close -- but the first part of the set was late-day daylight, which is much warmer than flash, thus the BLUE cast in the last part of the set).
Leonardo is WAY too much of a professional to make this sort of a mistake, I agree. Furthermore, Met-Art is WAY too professional and image-conscious to post sets like this. They should make photographers re-shoot a set when they turn in garbage like that. It does a disservice to a goddess like Mia, and it also makes Met-Art look bad!
Tuesday, January 27th, 2015 on Soleca
Of course I had noticed the difference in skin tones,but I meant it was Ok in the context.
However,your explanation clearly shows a mastery in the subject and is enough for me.Yes,Leo would had shot the other way.Maybe he could not do it.I truly admire Leo.He has brought here a ton of memorable images.
Anyway,maybe fer is right,and those pictures are good enough for those who are not interested in technical aspects of photography,and simply enjoy its content.And what a content...
I really appreciate your kind reply.The Seller
Could you be more specific about wrong exposure and why is exposure dreadful in this set? I consider myself someone who demands quality.Please don't remind me I'm a Paromov's fan,as it responds to aesthetic considerations only.I've been a semiprofessional photographer myself ,and I swear I can't see anything deadly wrong in exposure.The skin tone is Ok in most pictures.Are you talking about overexposed backgrounds? Some shots with a lot of zenithal light may demand less aperture,ending up with a perfectly exposed background,but an overly subexposed subject;then you 've got to compensate for this lowering speed or increasing aperture or maybe using a flashlight, or even modifying ISO settings.First two solutions end up washing out the background or worsens focus due to excess movement.Leo uses lighting outdoors sometimes,but then some photo geeks criticize him for that.Is it a catch22?.Please let me know your point of view.The Seller
Everybody comes here for different reasons, B-Man... some of us come here to critique the photography, some of us come here to enjoy the naked pretty girls. ( :
Personally, I know jack about photography and I'm glad because that allows me to enjoy pictures for pictures, not for their technical merit or lack thereof.
Hipshot is right, B-Man, members have been commenting on that ever since there has been the option to comment, and the photographers who have answered have told us many times that ladies in Eastern Europe frequently put pasties over their nipples when they tan. This seems odd to us, but apparently that is the way they do it over there. The explanation consistently given is that they believe it prevents skin cancer.
They are not bleached. They wear pasties when tanning and that is what you are seeing. I hate it too.
Hooray for large natural boobs! :)
...like a sticky substance would be necessary to enjoy those lovely breasts! LOL
This is interesting. I've been a pro photographer for a long time, so I'm used to people making statements about technical stuff and being way off base. If you hate Rylsky's style, that's one thing- I'm fine with that. But "overexposed, flat lifeless?" First, I don't agree these images are overexposed. The lighting is a bit flat, granted. Arkisi always has much more directional light, which is more dramatic looking. But then you often have deep shadows, and sometimes a girl's hot bits are lost in the dark. I'd be interested in hearing Bored1's description of what he means my over-processing. My experience is these guys don't do ENOUGH post-processing. If done right, tweaking levels, color balance and contrast can make the images so much better, I've beat Arkisi up a number of times on this. Lately his sets are MUCH better in that department. I doubt my comments had anything to do with it, probably a coincedence.
I'm glad you are sponsoring Sunshine's rating By man, she really deserves more, I can't understand why there is such a low rating trend lately, and since my photography hasn't changed much since the first sets with her and she even got a rating close to 9 and several well above 8 at the beginning I am starting to think that those who don't like me as a photographer (and commentator) and give several "1"s have an increasing influence as the total number of voters is decreasing, but it's bad that this affects Sunshine's sets because she doesn't deserve such treatment.
she is completely nude at the end. Maybe you did not look past the first 20 pics?
Don't get me wrong, full nude is always the goal, but if they're going to start off with come clothes on, there are certain items I like to see removed first. :)
I'm not sure why, but bottomless shots get me every time. Its super sexy in my opinion.
That said; full nude is quite nice too. And some more of that towards the end of the set would be a plus.
I agree, I only watched this set tough but when i was going through it , i was waiting till she would let us see her full body instead of her bottom or her face. I dont get why she would think her boobs are to small or something like that (Dont know if she actually thinks that but it looks like that in this set). Me personally like girls with smaller boobs. Nice girl but i cant give this set more then a 7.
I would agree that full natural bush CAN be a turn-off in many cases. Loreen seems to naturally have very fine hair and of lighter color so she can pull it off. In most cases though, trimmed is definitely better than shaved IMHO.
Sunday, January 11th, 2015 on Enasus
I agree By Man, though infinitely better than a notable photographer whose site I once subscribed to who notoriously turned one series into Part A and part B, or worse.
On the subject of care, I note that otherwise impeccable Carolizi neglects her pedicure. Like finding a stunning Ferrari with a rusty floor pan.
By man, it's nice to hear you like Vanessa and my work, and I can understand if this set is not among your favorites, as I explained I decided to shoot a set in this style in order to match the location and also to show a different, more sophisticated side of Vanessa. That said, I also agree that Vanessa is at the top of her beauty when she her fresh look is highlighted, so you can be sure that in most of her sets she will look that way. This was just an exception in order to add some variety.
Surprise! I'm in complete agreement.
Absolutely true. I think the reason could have something to do with the fact this bloated buffoon's are listed here as 'Artists'! The majority seem to be little more than walking ego's with a camera - (WEWC's)!
Katie is a Perfect 10, but this fact has not been a consideration by the snapper at any stage of this shoot. It's been all about his clownish idea of 'Art'.
Wednesday, January 7th, 2015 on Mirine
I ve been on vacations in Tenerife,Canary Islands.A lot of sun and sexy girls.All joy and fun.So, don't be
Too harsh on me.Im having a ball,as Freddie Mercury said.I''m serious most of the time.I swear.CheersThe Seller
Tuesday, January 6th, 2015 on Depiu
Just something to keep in mind.... for all that biting criticism in particular, and the criticism he receives here in comments in general, Paromov's been around forever on multiple sites (under multiple names) and appears to have achieved a certain amount of success selling his photos to a wide range of sites, on a sustained basis.
It appears to me that you just might be trying to teach gramma how to suck eggs, B-man... ( ;
Seconded! There's no reason to hide those piercings, so let's see this beautiful young woman as she is. :)
Saturday, January 3rd, 2015 on Karolina Young
Is it intended as a "soft focus" technique or is it just the way he shoots? When the whole set is this way, I have to wonder. Why have all those megapixels if the pictures are not sharp?
Agree wholeheartedly! Loreen does a nice job taking care of herself and keeping things under control down there. It seems to be more of her norm, so she must like it that way, plus it looks good on her. I would have no objections if other Met ladies were in that middle ground.
I think it was rather an "homage" to an old style of MA posing. Years back, a lot of the artists were having their models do this with jewelry. We hadn't seen it for several years, but all the sudden (3 sets in the last several weeks) we're seeing it again. Not to my taste, it was a fad I hoped had had its day and gone forever.
Saturday, January 3rd, 2015 on Cheaco
Gild the lily - id·i·om
1. To adorn unnecessarily something already beautiful.
2. To make superfluous additions to what is already complete.
Wish more babes had the micro-bush, it's so sexy!
Hooray for gradual nudity!
Blame the photographers for expressionless models. Some are idiots who think anything other than looking like an ice princess isn't sexy.
Agreed, B-man... as someone else said recently, if Irina ever allowed me between her thighs, when she was done she'd have to have my face surgically removed!
Tuesday, December 30th, 2014 on Relatre
No sorry, I am still going to post as much variety as possible. I am sorry you are not a fan of Paromov's work. What most members don't understand is that not everyone will post their requests/suggestions here in the comments. I get MANY emails a day sent to me directly and I have quite a few that accuse me of NOT having the "art" they believe we should. Sure enough, I received much praise after publishing these sets (and of course as many complaints). I personally like the fantasy aspect shown here but I accept that some members are put off by it.
One thing we can all agree on, these sets ignite a certain amount of conversation that isn't necessarily seen with the more modern sets I publish. I happen to enjoy reading the comments and opinions with the different styles of photography. Rest assured with 4 published sets every day, there will nearly always be one more to your taste :)
Have a happy holiday!
Saturday, December 27th, 2014 on Rhodi
That´s difficult to explain.Women have been using make up and all kinds of things that they believe enhance her beauty and make them
more attractive to men.And sure it works,otherwise they wouldn´t do it.It depends on your taste.It sure works for me.But clearly not for you. The Seller
I is a case of striving to please all the members. A admirable goal indeed. It is clear that there are some that get off on the playacting but that doesn't make it popular or unpopular simply different. There will always be an increase in comments for a set this divisive. because it causes both sides to desire to support their side of the argument. Elizabethan striptease has always had a negative effect on me as does the costuming of the period. To me is makes my skin crawl! Sort of the fingernails on a blackboard sort of thing.
"Well, another smoking turd of theatrics from Paramov's demented 'creative genius' never hurt anybody, I guess..."I love this sentence.
Honestly, this should be the last line in Met-Art's Corporate Mission Statement.
We at Met-Art strive to...Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, and then...
And, well, another smoking turd of theatrics from Paramov's demented 'creative genius' never hurt anybody, I guess...I'm still laughing at the beauty of it.
Ha ha! That's an AWESOME story for your nickname, B-man. (;
I don't have anywhere near as funny a story, although the one nickname I ever loved happened to me in high school. I didn't fit in with anyone except the kids who didn't fit in with anyone else... some stoners, some gamers, some drama club kids, some choir kids, some smoker's corner kids, etc. I wasn't any of those, but they were my friends.
They got together a basketball team for intramurals, just as a joke, and my team nickname (I was the official scorekeeper because I had less athletic prowess than anyone else) was "Igor."
I loved that nickname, but it never stuck... :P
Thursday, December 25th, 2014 on Presenting Loli
Just as fer_realz said, there is nothing wrong with a dissenting opinion, made respectfully as you have done. Photographers, as artists, have to be able to deal with criticism as well as praise. You have given reasons for your opinion, and that is all that any artist could ask for. For what it's worth, I happen to agree with every word you said, and its safe to say I'm not the only one.
The great thing about Met is that with all this material, there is something for just about anyone. Some like Paramov because he is more on the art side of MetArt. Like you, I think it should be more about the model. To each his (or her) own is the way I look at it.
Speaking of which, Loli is a cute little thing, and I hope she comes back again to show us more of that nice backside.
Happy Christmas eve to all.
Get the i Phone 6 plus! Happy christmas,B-manThe Seller
I guess because I don't know the technical aspects of producing the images, it allows me to focus on the images themselves. It's kinda a "looking at the forest or the trees" thing for me, I guess.
Reading your comment, By man, I can understand the abstract idea... but I don't feel that, emotionally, looking at Rylsky's sets, for example. I guess I look at the images and accept them as presented, rather than running them through a photoshop program in my mind to figure out how I would have shot them had I been the photographer...
I agree that Koenart, and DG work very differently than Rylsky, though I am surprised from what little I am able to observe that you don't include Matiss with Rylsky as far as image processing is concerned (I could be wrong about that observation, but looking at his images, I can't help but feel many of them are at least as highly processed as Rylsky's).
As for Flora's work... perhaps when zoomed in under hi rez, her fine detail isn't as sharp as some other photographers' is... BUT... she is THE master as far as I am concerned at evoking the erotic nature of her models, be it in stills or in video.
Wednesday, December 24th, 2014 on Qulpi
Having ~ and expressing ~ a dissenting or negative opinion doesn't make you or anyone an asshole, By man. As far as I am concerned, expressing it in a way that is respectful of the model and artist is what is important, and there is nothing in your comment that is disrespectful, from my POV.
I think that from what I've seen in artists' comments, they don't mind negative opinions, so long as the criticism is constructive and gives them hard data they can work with.
im not agree with you:)
Dude, my impression of all the foofaraw and uproar and heartache and gutrot we've seen in comments over the last several day is...
We ALL need to grow just a bit bigger sense of humor.
Really. I mean... is this B.S. that everyone's got their knickers all knotted up over REALLY that crucial, that we need to be taking it that seriously?
I admit it was rude of me to give you zero, considering you have a rational argument and argued it well, rather than just sounding off with a heated opinion.
I sincerely hope your Monday is much more pleasant than your weekend!
...and that goes for all of us! ( :
Monday, December 22nd, 2014 on Presenting Stephanie
By man, perhaps I am reading this wrong but...
You were the one to call Baggy a jackass, were you not?
Had he called Astralagus a jackass? No.
I was responding to Baggy's humor ~ it was biting, but funny.
I might say "if you can't stand the heat..." and remind you to get a slightly thicker skin, but I guess that would be rude wouldn't it...
And Rose is right, we should be courteous to each other.
Would you be opposed to me saying that Baggy still gets a point for (biting) humor, but that saying you get zero was rude, and besides, you also get a point for raising an objection and arguing your point articulately?
@ By man: My handle is Baggy36Pants, or if you prefer; Baggy36Pants you jackass.
By man, your notes about the shoes and the other one about the "model face" are agreeable, but in this case the shoes probably helped making Sunshine feel more confident and therefore showing her sexier side. Some models need a touch of freedom in choosing accessories and style for performing better.
@By Man - As far as her expression not changing, a case of "model face" (as I call it) hasn't seemed to negatively affect the many other models whose facial expressions seem locked in place.
With Sunshine, I think it was more of a factor of her not feeling comfortable yet as a nude model. In many of her earlier sets, she either seemed disengaged or had a bad case of "I don't want to be here" mentality going on, that showed in her facial expressions. But, she seems to be getting over that and I'm seeing progress in her last few sets. Baby steps, perhaps, but steady progress towards the better. In this set, in particular, it looks like she's finally breaking out of her shell and starting to express the more sensual side of herself.
Yea I kick her out-a bed because of those fake heavenly hooters. But only after I got tired of her rubbing them all over my face and by then it would take a crow bar to pry my face out from between them!
This series didn't achieve what I suspect it intended, and I don't share your enthusiasm for it, but I completely agree with your sentiment in the broader context - this is erotic art, not just porn.
The best series are those in which a naked model is the star, not baubles, beads or scenery.
AGREE, HER FIRST SET AND THIS ONE ARE FANTASTIC. ONE REQUEST PUT SOME TOOTH
IN YOUR SMILE YOU ARE BEAUTIFUL
I agree with "since she's gone back to her natural hair color, my appreciation of Monika has gone through the roof" By man.
I have increased my rating for Monika since then.
No, not just you.
I just checked to be sure. Neither dead babies nor defeated sphincters are in The Magwich Manual of Recommended Descriptive Vocabulary.
"In the last year or two, many photographers here have allowed their egos to balloon, intersecting far too much 'style' and detracting from the overall depiction of the model."
Just out of curiosity... how long have you been a member? Because you don't seem to be putting this in perspective.
My challenge to you... check out the archives. I don't mean from a few years back... I mean, from WAY back, just about as far as you can go.
In the oldest sets here, going on for quite a few years, what we got was a whole ton of "art" with some nudity... but hardly any explicit. You were lucky to see one or two pussy shots in 120 + pics.
I rather like today's balance of explicit vs. art shoots, and I'm willing to put up with a few art shoots to get a whole lot of explicit. But that might just be me....
Contrast that with today's shoots and you see 9 out of 10 (unscientific estimate there, to make my point) are quite explicit for most of the set. A huge change from what MA used to be for a very long time....
Tuesday, December 2nd, 2014 on Mirine
That you think there's been more "style" in "the last year or two" is downright funny. You might want to take a walk through the history of MA, cuz you've got it 100% backwards. The site has definitely been trending toward less "artistic" sets and more generic "here's a naked girl presented with mediocre - but highly revealing - photography".
I agree, When a set stops being about the model and starts being about art or at least the photographers concept then I loose interest. This set had all the ingredients to be "special" had the photographer shot crisp clear full color photos. This is an erotic nude site and we come to see erotic nude women. IMO Katie is one of the most lovely girls here and is plenty erotic without special effects and soft grainy photos. Why so many of the artists here are so enamored with this washed out poorly focused "dream world look" is beyond me. Give us the full beauty of the model and let us create the dream in our own minds. I can assure you that Katie needs no special effects to create dreams for me!
I completely agree with you.
I'm with you, By man. Yet another overexposed, fuzzy, out-of-focus mess.
How about crisp and clear photos with a natural color saturation for a change? Huh? Or will that offend someone's delicate "artistic" sensibilities? Poor photography should never be excused as being "art".
I'm not a fan of Paromov either. I wish he'd/she'd give up on the props and theatrics.
It seems his/her photo shoots are as much (or more so) about him/her as they are the model who's posing.
I have to say that that first line tells me all I need to know. When a person is viewing photos at high res that person is not there to enjoy the beautiful women he/she is there to find fault. High res has no purpose other than poster prints or to nitpick the small details that the average viewer would never see. These photos are jpg format and highly compressed. Not a good combination if your looking at grain structure and macro structures. Post processing and electronic data transfer is not photo friendly.
So negitive and such language. You won't be missed I can assure you.
TBH By man, I rarely notice such things unless someone else (like you today) points them out....
However, for what it is worth, I remember when I joined (some time in 2010 I think) I caught the tail end of the "long necklaces used as accessories on the pussy and butt of the model" fad. I am not sad to see that fad dead.
Friday, October 24th, 2014 on Rinute
Since my wife has a vast collection of these I dare not say a word.
However she called while I was typing this. "Tell him it started in the 1920's and thus his hope of it as a "fad" is probably wrong. And the one Lorena is wearing is either a vintage one of backlite for the "beads" or a modern copy of a vintage one. Be it a simple strand of pearls to a "I hope they have a strong back" type I am afraid like high heels they are here to stay. And if her being able to wear it even on the beach helps her smile then I vote "go for it".
If I want to see that beautiful smile, I have to accept the fact that SHE would rather shoot outdoors.
My guess is that SHE likes the big, gaudy necklace and wears them in her private life as well.
My suggestion is that you acquire a taste for big, gaudy necklaces.
Don't agree with your term "overexposed". You may not LIKE the brightness of the lighting, but technically speaking your accusation of overexposed is not correct. I happen to like it, we all have our preferences.
Being a photographer myself I find the trend you mentioned distressing also. I am aware that many feel like this dreamy surreal look is "Artistic" but for me it is harsh and anything but lifelike. Everyone has things that they look for and each is different in his/her likes and dislikes, Both in the models and the photography. For me the art is the model and presenting her at her absolute best. When a photographer starts wandering off trying to create "artistic" effects I lose interest quickly. I was always taught that good art imitates life and gives one a since of being there immersed in the moment. For me the goal was always to present rich full lifelike colors and skin tones. If it doesn't look like you were actually there then the artist failed!
That's for sure. Also, she is in one of their erotic massage videos with a great orgasm.
Such a horrible dilemma, amirite? ( ;
Saturday, October 18th, 2014 on Presenting Sonnett
I don't think I could pick just one set on most days here.
You can burn off to a DVD-R, 4.7 Gig will hold a lot of Met on a single disk (the average set is like 15 Meg on low resolution = 300 sets), and a 1 TB portable HDD is under a US$65.
She does have a really great by, to be sure.
it is one more pleasant comment. One more of the best compliments which I ever heard. I think that, of that thought in my person. It is the truth. So it also is. I love that I do, I like to prove to be to you.your Patritcy
I dare say...her "public hair"?? I wonder if she DOES show her pubic hair in public...(???) lol ;o) Couldn't resist this one...lol
How nice to allow that someone is a person with their own decisions to make. Any opinion on the quality of the work?
I have to agree. To me this woman was never really undressed! I would much rather see her pink parts than a fur bikini!
Multiple points well made.
Thursday, September 11th, 2014 on Titoria
She has absolutely grown more beautiful with age, and lost none of her sexy playfulness. I fell in love with her watching her first (or was it second?) vid, the one with her in the field of yellow flowers. Even though there was very little explicit content in it, her personality came through so strongly she was irresistible... and she's still got it.
I WOULD very much like to see some new vids of her....
Monday, July 28th, 2014 on Kumri
You got that right! They are not only gorgeous lips, but the red color popping off that porcelain white skin is SO sexy! It just doesn't get any better.
Gotta agree, I second your implied nomination to the PP Club... ( :
Weigh in, fellow old farts!
Tuesday, July 8th, 2014 on Presenting Karolina Young
It is an absolute delight, as is Vittoria as a whole ( or hole? :P), however she has serious competition from Mia Sollis, Grace C, Avia A and her fellow model today Emily Bloom, to name but a few, all of whom have similar, gorgeously lovely, shaven, tight looking vaginas, what absolute heaven we have here!.
Censor, why don't you remove his comment, which prompted my response?
Is his somehow OK, and mine not, because I suggested a woman's denuded pubic area looks kinda childish from some angles?
Censorship running full force.
The freedom we had is lost.
I hope you're happy, nitwits! :-))
It's called selective insulting :-)
Friday, June 13th, 2014 on Vietoje
My response that was here has been removed.
Too bad -- you're missing a good one if I do say so myself!
It also garnered 5 thumbs :-)the aggrieved ☹Let the censorship begin!?
You're pretty lucky, dude. You get to say your piece twice, while my response, which got last I looked 5 agreeing thumbs, has been deleted.
Guess the editors like you more than me!
Have fun, but be careful what you say!the censored :-(
Thanks for the personally directed psych analysis based on a five word comment. PhD in psychology is hereby granted along with the Title of Nobility "Arbiter of Where It's At". Masters degree in Logic granted for the thesis: "Inherency of Labial Intimidation in Subscribers to Nude Erotic Websites"
Don't feed the Troll
haha Patrick :D Thank you soo much :* :Patritcy
i fully agree. please check quality of sets before posting. employ skilled assistants to help you. we write to you because we LOVE Met Art
Quantity over quality...
Hides body hair better :-? :-)))
You never know -- pointing it out may do some good :-)
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.