Advanced Search
Advanced Search

Evis's Comments

E

Evis 3 years ago

Yes Bikeman4, I couldn't agree more! Very beautiful! And I have always thought that Met is discriminating black girls. Or even worse, discriminating us subscribers who like black girls :)
I don't know why, but they are regrettable very rare at Met, always has.
So hopefully Gana is breaking some new land here! :)

Tuesday, July 1st, 2014 on Gana

E

Evis 3 years ago

Yeah a beauty for sure, but you must have good eyes to spot sand on her constantly overexposed body shots. So give her a more competent photographer to make her justice!

Saturday, May 3rd, 2014 on Viola Bailey

E

Evis 4 years ago

To compensate for bad photography?

Tuesday, December 17th, 2013 on Nelly D

E

Evis 4 years ago

I agree! Matisse, the painter was a colourful artist, this one isn't. The same problems with his pictures of beautiful Flora yesterday. Too many of the Met photographers are overexposing their photos, except maybe for Leonardo, Luca Helios and maybe someone more.
But Marta is truly a beautiful girl so it's a pity the photos doesn't do her justice!

Saturday, December 14th, 2013 on Marta E

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes I agree, one of the best looking girls, but as you said, the photographer? Looks like he's using one of the first digital cameras from the end of the nineties. No contrast, no skin texture. Too many of these kind of photographers at Met for the moment.

Thursday, December 12th, 2013 on Vanessa J

E

Evis 4 years ago

I can't see why so many of you're complaining about Evanida. At least you can see the model in those shots which you hardly could in the previous presentation shots which were so overexposed that you could hardly see Sabrina against the sand dunes. They were terrible, although Sabrina was very nice of what you could see of her.
Too many photographers at Met are in my opinion overexposing their pictures or are lacking in contrast and missing in skin tones.

Monday, December 9th, 2013 on Sabrina G

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes but this photographer should not be encouraged. No contrast! Which is a common problem with most Met photographers.

Saturday, December 7th, 2013 on Blanca A

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes, she’s truly very beautiful, one of the most beautiful Met-model ever and for once the Met-photographer equalled the quality of the model, which doesn’t happen too often.

Sunday, November 24th, 2013 on Sandra Lauver

E

Evis 4 years ago

I agree, but then with a photographer who shoot with more contrast and not with pictures with no skin texture looking like they are shot with the first digital cameras from the nineties.
A problem with most Met photographers, mostly with no contrast, no skin texture, bleak and dull.

Wednesday, November 13th, 2013 on Emily Bloom

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes Nastya K is very beautiful, but get rid of Catherine. I have never liked her photos and the picture of Nastya 13.06.2013 with an annoying blade of grass right in front of her delicious cunt was the absolute end of my indulgence with Catherine.

Sunday, November 3rd, 2013 on Nastya K

E

Evis 4 years ago

Personally I hate when the photographer makes the model constantly look the other way, to not look into the camera but in a complete other direction. I want the model to pay attention to me! Not a crew member on the other side of the studio!
Therefore the photo set from the 26 of July is a big disappointment.

Saturday, September 14th, 2013 on Vanda B

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes she is very beautiful, but the more sad that the photographer can't handle the light. So all the credit to Delfina, not the man practising behind the camera.

Wednesday, August 28th, 2013 on Delfina A

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes she is truly beautiful, but sometimes the accessories are simply too much, which is often the case with flowers, necklaces, fruits and so on, and gets in the way for your imagination. Who for examples wants to fuck on a pile of apples?

Tuesday, August 27th, 2013 on Zlatka A

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes I agree, so please Karina, visit another photographer next time, because this one don't do you or any other girl justice.

Monday, August 26th, 2013 on Karina O

E

Evis 4 years ago

Rockhard,
thou I can see some points in what you are saying, you lack credibility by using foul words and not accept any ones right to express their view.
She is selling something here for money and can, if she is reading all this, be expected to take some criticism when it's decent and politely forwarded. Which I think Linuxmaniac did.
By the way, I myself think miss Jennifer is one of the most beautiful girls on MetArt ever.

Monday, August 19th, 2013 on Jennifer Mackay

E

Evis 4 years ago

Furthermore, he is still shooting in his low contrast technique that gives the skin no texture.

Wednesday, August 14th, 2013 on Patritcy A

E

Evis 4 years ago

Couldn't agree more, this photographer shouldn't be encouraged.

Monday, August 12th, 2013 on Angelique A

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes I agree, nearly all Koenart's pix are taken with high key exposure so you seldom see any texture in the girls bodies or skin. He's pix are a big waste of time, money and beautiful girls being lost.

Monday, August 5th, 2013 on Adriana F

E

Evis 3 years ago

Yes Bikeman4, I couldn't agree more! Very beautiful! And I have always thought that Met is discriminating black girls. Or even worse, discriminating us subscribers who like black girls :)
I don't know why, but they are regrettable very rare at Met, always has.
So hopefully Gana is breaking some new land here! :)

Tuesday, July 1st, 2014 on Gana

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes, she’s truly very beautiful, one of the most beautiful Met-model ever and for once the Met-photographer equalled the quality of the model, which doesn’t happen too often.

Sunday, November 24th, 2013 on Sandra Lauver

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes she is very beautiful, but the more sad that the photographer can't handle the light. So all the credit to Delfina, not the man practising behind the camera.

Wednesday, August 28th, 2013 on Delfina A

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes I agree, so please Karina, visit another photographer next time, because this one don't do you or any other girl justice.

Monday, August 26th, 2013 on Karina O

E

Evis 4 years ago

Rockhard,
thou I can see some points in what you are saying, you lack credibility by using foul words and not accept any ones right to express their view.
She is selling something here for money and can, if she is reading all this, be expected to take some criticism when it's decent and politely forwarded. Which I think Linuxmaniac did.
By the way, I myself think miss Jennifer is one of the most beautiful girls on MetArt ever.

Monday, August 19th, 2013 on Jennifer Mackay

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes but this photographer should not be encouraged. No contrast! Which is a common problem with most Met photographers.

Saturday, December 7th, 2013 on Blanca A

E

Evis 4 years ago

Personally I hate when the photographer makes the model constantly look the other way, to not look into the camera but in a complete other direction. I want the model to pay attention to me! Not a crew member on the other side of the studio!
Therefore the photo set from the 26 of July is a big disappointment.

Saturday, September 14th, 2013 on Vanda B

E

Evis 4 years ago

Furthermore, he is still shooting in his low contrast technique that gives the skin no texture.

Wednesday, August 14th, 2013 on Patritcy A

E

Evis 3 years ago

Yeah a beauty for sure, but you must have good eyes to spot sand on her constantly overexposed body shots. So give her a more competent photographer to make her justice!

Saturday, May 3rd, 2014 on Viola Bailey

E

Evis 4 years ago

To compensate for bad photography?

Tuesday, December 17th, 2013 on Nelly D

E

Evis 4 years ago

I agree! Matisse, the painter was a colourful artist, this one isn't. The same problems with his pictures of beautiful Flora yesterday. Too many of the Met photographers are overexposing their photos, except maybe for Leonardo, Luca Helios and maybe someone more.
But Marta is truly a beautiful girl so it's a pity the photos doesn't do her justice!

Saturday, December 14th, 2013 on Marta E

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes I agree, one of the best looking girls, but as you said, the photographer? Looks like he's using one of the first digital cameras from the end of the nineties. No contrast, no skin texture. Too many of these kind of photographers at Met for the moment.

Thursday, December 12th, 2013 on Vanessa J

E

Evis 4 years ago

I can't see why so many of you're complaining about Evanida. At least you can see the model in those shots which you hardly could in the previous presentation shots which were so overexposed that you could hardly see Sabrina against the sand dunes. They were terrible, although Sabrina was very nice of what you could see of her.
Too many photographers at Met are in my opinion overexposing their pictures or are lacking in contrast and missing in skin tones.

Monday, December 9th, 2013 on Sabrina G

E

Evis 4 years ago

I agree, but then with a photographer who shoot with more contrast and not with pictures with no skin texture looking like they are shot with the first digital cameras from the nineties.
A problem with most Met photographers, mostly with no contrast, no skin texture, bleak and dull.

Wednesday, November 13th, 2013 on Emily Bloom

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes Nastya K is very beautiful, but get rid of Catherine. I have never liked her photos and the picture of Nastya 13.06.2013 with an annoying blade of grass right in front of her delicious cunt was the absolute end of my indulgence with Catherine.

Sunday, November 3rd, 2013 on Nastya K

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes she is truly beautiful, but sometimes the accessories are simply too much, which is often the case with flowers, necklaces, fruits and so on, and gets in the way for your imagination. Who for examples wants to fuck on a pile of apples?

Tuesday, August 27th, 2013 on Zlatka A

E

Evis 4 years ago

Couldn't agree more, this photographer shouldn't be encouraged.

Monday, August 12th, 2013 on Angelique A

E

Evis 4 years ago

Yes I agree, nearly all Koenart's pix are taken with high key exposure so you seldom see any texture in the girls bodies or skin. He's pix are a big waste of time, money and beautiful girls being lost.

Monday, August 5th, 2013 on Adriana F

2

2Shy 4 months ago

Bad photography? No. No. No! Get a life! She displays excellent flexibility to make the shoot more sexy!

Sunday, June 25th, 2017 on Nelly D

A

Arkie 2 1 year ago

Uh... MORE megapixels do NOT make a better photograph, or photographer for that matter.

Maybe you already know, maybe you don't, but not all of the sets presented on MetArt were necessarily shot recently. K, the content manager, has a large library of as-yet unpublished work, some I'm sure dating back more than a year or two. So to lump a group of photographers together because of what you perceive as having used outdated or outmoded equipment "... from the end of the nineties." is just not a fair statement of what the reality may be.

And FYI Koenart is a female photographer.

Thursday, September 8th, 2016 on Vanessa J

r

rachsback 4 years ago

That only makes you as full of shit as he is!!

Saturday, April 12th, 2014 on Jennifer Mackay

M

Magwich 4 years ago

I hereby encourage this photographer. I encourage critique over cat claws.

Monday, March 31st, 2014 on Angelique A

d

dnjndn 4 years ago

I agree, set design, lighting, equipment, etc. I know it is "most erotic " but I really want to see details; that makes it more real, more erotic.

Sunday, March 16th, 2014 on Blanca A

B

Browning 4 years ago

Your language is disgusting. You need to learn to respect women. Men don't talk that way about, or to, any woman.

Wednesday, November 27th, 2013 on Nastya K

C

Catherine 4 years ago

I agree with you that Nastya K is very beautiful. And you Evis unfortunately stupid. I doubt that you will be able to quickly get rid of it.

I give reason for why I called you stupid. How can you not love a photographer? You can not love your enemy. If my work once you do not like, why do you see them now? Brings you pleasure when you see something you do not like?

Monday, November 18th, 2013 on Nastya K

R

Rich 4 years ago

You can't compare the work done by Arkisi and Angelique to that submitted by Linin.

Saturday, September 28th, 2013 on Angelique A