Why shoes? :(
Sunday, October 1st, 2017 on Refica
Why socks? :((
Thursday, September 28th, 2017 on Kosin
Saturday, September 23rd, 2017 on Finnec
Wednesday, September 13th, 2017 on Medoca
Why socks? :(
Tuesday, August 29th, 2017 on Ormie
How can I fall at her feet if they nor even are at the scene?
Friday, August 11th, 2017 on Encali
Thursday, August 3rd, 2017 on Nezuta
Nice set! But how can it get so many feet tags if their feet barely are shown? Not even one soles pic... It's a complete mistery to me...
Sunday, June 11th, 2017 on Flery
I loved it!
Friday, June 2nd, 2017 on Alirea
Monday, May 15th, 2017 on Jadola
Monday, May 15th, 2017 on Dessino
Where are her feett?! :(
Sunday, May 7th, 2017 on Sineva
At least CL has valued her feet in this set, different from others. It is promissing.
Sunday, May 7th, 2017 on Tosiea
Actually a simple rating might not provide a decent feedback for artists, since it is subjective and there are certainly many characteristics that we users value in different ways.
I´m a feet guy so I´m not keen on sets I can´t see their feet. I´m very fond of artists like Albert Varin and Rylsky among others because they understand me. I often find very nice feet pics in their sets.
Rating is the only resource I have to make my point, although it's a very poor one.
Thursday, April 6th, 2017 on Recala
Where are her feet?
Thursday, April 6th, 2017 on Presenting Kylie Page
Why Shoes? Why? :(
Thursday, February 23rd, 2017 on Misheir
No feet at all! :(
Thursday, February 9th, 2017 on Presenting Gloia
Why those shoes? :(
Sunday, March 23rd, 2014 on Siden
Plz repeat this one without socks! Plz!
Tuesday, February 25th, 2014 on Imenima
Rylsky, you are the best!
Wednesday, February 12th, 2014 on Amfani
Feet lovers like me will love this set!
Friday, January 24th, 2014 on Ricanta
Rylsky is the master of pretty feet pics!
He never gets me down, since he always include medial views of feet soles like #33 to #35 and #42 / #43.
If all Met-Art sets came up with those kind of pics, it would be just perfect!
Thursday, January 23rd, 2014 on Lissafi
Rylsky, master of all feet lovers! ;)
Sunday, January 19th, 2014 on Gyarra
Lickable feet? Suckable toes? Where? She's not even barefoot!
Definitely there is a trouble with tags in Met-Art!
Saturday, August 10th, 2013 on Fericire
I've sent the following email to Support. Perhaps you guys agree with this suggestion. If so, I invite you to join me! ;)
As an old Met Art fan, and also a niches' fan (specially feet), I'd like to make a suggestion:
What about allowing some niche tags for pics?
Tags could be simple, like "boobs", "feet", "ass" etc (no need to choose between "perfect feet", or "sexy feet", or "nice feet", or "beautiful feet", or "pretty feet"and so forth. Only "feet"!)
The more a given pic is marked with a certain tag, the upper it will appear in this tag's list, so it would be a easier way to measure pics' popularity for each niche!
Sunday, July 7th, 2013 on Mistiko
Totally agreed! Rylskky is my favourite artist ever in Met-Art for two reasons: 1) He is really good/ 2) He always get fabulous shots of her model's feet. No one makes it so well as him...
Wednesday, June 26th, 2013 on Limita
Wow! Sequence from #69 to #73 is one of the best feet sequences I've ever seen!
Foot Lovers, I strongly recommend this model, Katya AC. Have a look at her nice sets and enjoy her gorgeous feet!
Monday, April 29th, 2013 on Pombe
Why not shoes? Why ask why when you are looking at a set of photos of a beautiful woman stripping out of a skin-tight dress on the balcony of what appears to be a very lovely residence.... for no particular reason at all!
Sorry, suppose that spoiled it for you. It was good for me. Just shows how diverse we members are in our peculiar tastes.Mound Lover
Uhm... There's gotta be better sites out there for foot freaks than Met???
Jeeze, I wonder why? would feet have anything to do with it? ;-)
I keep wondering the same thing. They're okay for the first half, but geez. Leave them out of the 2nd half of the set.
As ZZ Top once said, "every girl's crazy about a sharp dressed man." Well, the obverse is also true - every man's crazy about a sharp dressed girl - especially when she's showing off the good stuff.
Sunday, May 25th, 2014 on Siden
Since you inquired, and as one who appreciates such accoutrements, and since no one else has explained it, I guess I will take on that chore. There are several reasons for "why the shoes."
1. They make a model look sexier, sluttier, and hotter because they make her look like she just got home from a hot date with you and couldn't wait to get totally undressed before showing off her wares. And they make her look sexier, sluttier, and hotter whether she's standing up, sitting down, lying on her back, lying on her stomach, or standing on her head.
2. They offset redundancy. Looking at the same models over and over again totally nude becomes boring and makes all the sets of that model look the same. Changintg the scenery does nothing to compensate for looking at the same person many, many times the same way. When a couple comes to the point in their relationship where their sex life has lost its spark, what do they do? The woman goes to Victoria's Secret and buys some nice things to dress up with; this reignites the spark the couple once had and renews sexual interest. Dressing the models up here adds variety and makes it more interesting, more distinguishable, more memorable, and more appealing. As has often been said, but bears repeating, variety is the spice of life, and MET ART is best served by offering spice over redundancy.
3. Some people think feet are ugly. Just because 2 or 3 prefer feet to heels doesn't mean everyone does. There are many who join MET ART who think women's feet look much better in heels than without them.
4. This website is not just for foot lovers. MET ART caters to a wide variety of clientele. By not offering models that wear heels, and/or other accoutrements, they are cutting out the interests of those who like that kind of thing. The day that this website becomes exclusively for those who have a foot fetish is the day I stop handing over my credit card number to them and go somewhere else instead. They would be shooting themselves in the foot by going that route.
So you see there are many good reasons to offer galleries like this one where the model wears some portion of clothing, whether that be heels, stockings, or whatever. In the final analysis, it's just good business practice for the owners of this website because it adds a dimension to MET ART that a lot of people want and will pay for.
Lauren is one of my favorite MA models. I agree with you that the shoes are out of place and spoil the set! There are women on this site that have beautiful, sensual, lovable feet and Lauren is definitely one of those. I'm with you!
I guess some people like to see nude women wearing shoes. Not me. To me, women's bare feet are so much more expressive than shoes can ever be. But, "sexy" shoes and stockings have been an important part of erotica for many years. I believe they are supposed to emphasize the model's nudity, like jewelry. Or, perhaps there is much I am not experiencing regarding footwear because of my opinions. Oh, well.
she does have nice feet.
Too bad a lot of models don't seem to care about their feet and instead are sporting 'walking warts'
Rylsky never forgets to give a piece of candy to each fetishist.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.