So many words I could use to express myself right now. However, "Wow says it all!"
Wednesday, July 11th, 2018 on Linim
Perfect all around! Wish more sets had this same quality!
Friday, July 6th, 2018 on Errine
I wish Met Art would use this set as a standard for all sets to come! This was outstanding!
Sunday, June 10th, 2018 on Cyrien
Beautiful woman! Uninspiring set!
Saturday, June 9th, 2018 on Siutta
This set was unbelievable all around! What a fantasy it created!
Wednesday, April 11th, 2018 on Sinna
Beautiful woman, without a doubt! Horrible set!
Tuesday, March 20th, 2018 on Remina
How can this set not receive a perfect score? Absolutely, perfection!
Sunday, February 25th, 2018 on Secarba
If i counted correctly, you replied because you pointed out eight pictures. When there are only eight pictures, you might as well say the whole set!
Monday, December 18th, 2017 on Toriae
Charles Lightfoot please stop taking so may photos so close up you can see the models full body. Do not like your style of pics, love the models!
Saturday, December 16th, 2017 on Toriae
This set proves that METART knows how to produce a perfect set. It is just crazy that you have to wait on average 19 more before they get it right again. Perfectly done!
Thursday, December 7th, 2017 on Eldya
Without a doubt, this is the first really nice set in about 12. Way to go METART!
Tuesday, November 28th, 2017 on Aesen
Yet, again, another disappointing set. I will always be excited about seeing a beautiful naked woman, but I am getting tired of the boring sets. When you have maybe five good shots in a set, it is nothing more then disappointing.
Wednesday, November 15th, 2017 on Ticale
Nikia A could never be disappointing no matter how many sets she is the focus. The set is due to the quality of the poses, disappointing!
Wednesday, November 15th, 2017 on Nelero
See, it is like METART knows it has to posted a set that is out of this world to keep us hoping for more. It is just they are too far in between each other! Such a nice set!
Sunday, November 5th, 2017 on Telair
Friday, November 3rd, 2017 on Presenting Giana
See, this what I am writing about at times with METART. Yarina A is not one of my favorites, she is my favorite! This set was a little better than mediocre. The excitement came from just the fact it was her. Going from page to page you soon realize there are very few inspiring photos. This was a wasted opportunity to creatively and seductively share one of the most beautiful women of METART!
Thursday, November 2nd, 2017 on Satesi
She is one of the best without a doubt! The set was right on and we need more like them. It actually shows an entire beautiful woman's body in most pics. I also love the setting. I wish METART would require more of them from their photographers.
Monday, October 30th, 2017 on Gikona
Very poor quality photos! The style of the poses is another set back. She is without a doubt beautiful, so take full quality photos of her!
Thursday, October 19th, 2017 on Retun
The photos are dark and blurring on closeups. Very disappointing!
Tuesday, October 10th, 2017 on Fenaco
That was the worst set ever!
Monday, October 2nd, 2017 on Presenting Jia Lissa
Megan Rain is a beautiful woman without a doubt! However, Charles Lightfoot is not the photographer for her. I do not like his style of so many partial photos. I would like to be able to see her whole body in a normal setting with good lighting.
Wednesday, August 2nd, 2017 on Poare
This by far has been the best set easily in the last 100 sets. I wish all of them were of the same quality. Great job!
Monday, July 24th, 2017 on Alidre
Pandora B is an extremely beautiful woman! With that said, this was a very boring set!
Monday, July 10th, 2017 on Tulinea
See, why is this so had to get? This is as near a perfect set as possible! Stefany Sonri is incredibly beautiful, the poses and the setting is near perfect. Around one out of every 15 sets may have this quality of reaction. It is sad that I hang in there with Met Art for this one to show up. Great job, thank you!
Friday, April 28th, 2017 on Retin
Really, the netting or whatever you want to call it. Love seeing her in the bedroom, but what a waste. Her body was hidden most of the time. Love Melena, not so much the set!
Saturday, April 22nd, 2017 on Jenisy
I wish all the sets were of this quality. I would have chosen a different setting though!
Wednesday, April 19th, 2017 on Werdda
Met Art has without a doubt the most beautiful women on its site. Pandora B being one of my top choices. I need to say this set was very disappointing. It seems more disappointing when you see one of your favorites on the main page for the new group of daily photos. Your heart misses a beat thinking this set of your favorite will make up for all the other disappointing sets lately on Met Art. Pandora B and the other beautiful models will always be able to cause the heart to miss a beat, however, present them in a way that does not disappoint my imagination!
Friday, April 7th, 2017 on Kaiba
This opportunity to see these two beautiful women together was diminished by the setting!
Monday, April 3rd, 2017 on Retya
Like your style! This is a great site, however, there needs to be a person approving the sets before they are posted. Each set should be of the highest standards since it is a paid service.
Sunday, March 26th, 2017 on Nesotie
You take someone as beautiful as Michaela and wrap her in a curtain. She is one of the models when you see a set of hers pop up your heart almost comes to a stop. Then when you open the set, she is wrapped with a curtain in almost every photo. This is not creativity, it is cruelty!
Saturday, February 25th, 2017 on Sectine
Sydney Wolf is without a doubt a beautiful new comer to Met! The problem that I always have will be there were about ten photos of her entire body. The theme in the kitchen I do not mind because it makes you want that morning coffee even more. However, I do not agree with the majority of the photos being partials, it takes away from the set.
Wednesday, February 15th, 2017 on Presenting Sydney Wolf
Now, this is a set that MetArt can be proud of presenting. It was perfect in every word. These sets are 49% admiration for the female body, 51% imagination of being there with her. They are at the right distance with no distractions around her body. If it was desired, zoom in on a part of her beautiful body!
Sunday, February 12th, 2017 on Seva
All Lorena B would have to do is ask and I would give her whatever she desired! I have thought of her as a goddess from the first time I ever saw her.
Thursday, February 9th, 2017 on Tonne
See, Ron Offlin has gotten it right. Every set does not have to be this setting, but this style and quality of a set. Why can't every set follow this model of shooting? The poses and the mood are perfect!
Tuesday, February 7th, 2017 on Yanta
Not talking far away shots. Talking shots that include the entire body. There reason to cut off part of a head, leg, foot, or any body part. The reason they have come up with high resolution, is so a person can choose to zoom in on a certain part of a photo. The viewer should have both options! Especially since we are paying for it.
Monday, February 6th, 2017 on Zianca
I love seeing this woman too! Why is it that only a few of her photos captures her entire beautiful body? We wait for her level of beauty to show up, please get it right!
Sunday, February 5th, 2017 on Zianca
I would like to say to MetArt that every set should use these poses and views as a standard fro every set. It is sad that they are far and few lately. Well done Peter Guzman! Also, Divina A no matter what is still looking good.
Saturday, January 28th, 2017 on Eniza
Very nice! It seems that when you cast the first stone and someone throws back you get offended. Emotions due show the truth behind the statements. I have the right to express my opinion as well as you, however, you felt that yours was more true. Yet, mine also has truth since it is the way I see it. You like to write long winded comments and I have not the time nor the energy. Sometimes one word seems to do just fine. Look at all the attention it has brought. The one thing I will give you that not many could disagree with, you do have air! A whole bag of hot air!
Thursday, December 15th, 2016 on Teleco
It seems that you are in need of poetic jester. Each of you writes these long messages that flow with what you think makes you sound so clever. All it really is, let me see, "A waste of effort and electromagnetic energy!" The truth is that you like blowing hot air or just enjoy your little club of hot air blowers. The terrible, let me enlighten you! It means extremely disagreeable. You see, I would rather see a set that you can focus on the reason I am paying for this site, beautiful woman. Women who are not commonly found in a set that their bodies are hidden by leaves, in a chair all the time, or in front of a window so they are faded out. You see the word terrible says it all. Now I have become more like you, a bag of hot air with very little taste. Hence, the name Ingoodtaste. What was you hipshot131 (hard to believe there might be 131 of this person out there in the world) you have been outed!
Wednesday, December 14th, 2016 on Teleco
Tuesday, December 13th, 2016 on Tilden
Tuesday, December 13th, 2016 on Teleco
When you have to wait until page five to see a decent photo, it is not OK. I love this woman, but she needs to put out a decent set that you would want to write, "wow!" I has been too long.
Tuesday, December 13th, 2016 on Olaty
I do see equally the beauty of Suzanna, but I do not have any kind words about the setting for the set. I would like to see every inch of her body in a setting that could only magnify those beautiful aspects of her body. This set surely does not do meet that goal!
Thursday, December 1st, 2016 on Estrid
Mention the window in the background and how it washes out the photo. Yes she is beautiful, however, the set could have been better.
Tuesday, November 29th, 2016 on Medisha
The thought I would like to share is on the setting. I am starting to think I would like to be a photographer. It does not take too much common sense to realize a window in the background will wash out the photos. There were several photos that were out of focus and washed out. This woman is beautiful and does not come up enough to be wasted on poor photography!
Wednesday, November 23rd, 2016 on Meeta
Nooo! Terrible setting! Again, a waste of wishful thinking when you see it is Zarina set. What a beautiful woman.
Friday, November 11th, 2016 on Toshena
This is the worst set we have seen on this site. Elen Moore herself has presented herself well in the set. Taking the photos in front of a window so every photo is washed out is without a doubt ridiculous! Met Art needs to start looking at what is being posted better.
Tuesday, November 1st, 2016 on Eley
See, I wish all the sets at Met would be this quality. This is unbelievable! So many times you have a great set and the model does not match the set. Or, you have an out of this world model and the set is terrible. Rare you ahve both standards in the same set!
Sunday, October 2nd, 2016 on Ravile
Great set! There are so many other models I wish were in a set like this one. Great set!!!
Monday, September 26th, 2016 on Dajile
See, this was perfect all around. Unbelievable!
Friday, September 23rd, 2016 on Sonora
Sorry for the lack of comment. It is never no to Candice, it is no to the setting. What a waste of her post. How long before the next one? We have to hope it will be better than this last post!
Sunday, September 18th, 2016 on Boniu
Ok, there is no doubt Nancy A is a unbelievable woman! However, Erro has done an outstanding job in presenting her beauty. I wish more sets would in this example. It has been a long time for me to be able to write that an entire set was outstanding. It was not just two pic or three pics on a page. It was the entire set. Please Met Art, give Erro a bonus. He has just renewed my faith once again.
Sunday, September 18th, 2016 on Feglin
Saturday, September 17th, 2016 on Moshee
Saturday, September 17th, 2016 on Boniu
Terrible, the poses were terrible! Let's cal it what it is and stop focusing on just her beauty. Li Moon is a beautiful, however, the set was even near good compared to her beauty.
Thursday, September 15th, 2016 on Trenja
Leonardo, welcome back! This set is how you used to show your skills! Kenya you are beautiful!
Thursday, August 18th, 2016 on Carana
Tammi Lee, again beautiful! Wow, I was surprised when I saw her set was involving a chair. At least they were many full body shots. I out of two is better than nothing!
Saturday, August 6th, 2016 on Cymole
All true about Mia! What, the setting, give me a break.
Saturday, August 6th, 2016 on Follie
Now, I never wanted this set to end! Perfect all the way around. Mango has everything possible to be one of the most beautiful!
Monday, August 1st, 2016 on Primar
Ok, she is beautiful, however the set was less than OK. There were a total of five photos in the whole set that were full body. I like the setting and the choice of clothes. After that nothing! Met Art is still maintaining the 1:15 ratio.
Thursday, July 28th, 2016 on Anteza
Fernanda is completely out of this world beautiful. I would like to see one set of her in a bedroom with just a sheet and not one part of her body covered with anything. Just one set that would be a moment you would never want to end.
Monday, July 25th, 2016 on Nosteli
Ok, It has been awhile since we have had a set where the woman is beautiful and the set was also nice. Great job all around!
Saturday, July 16th, 2016 on Presenting Veronika Benet
Amelie B I am never disappointed in seeing. She is truly a treasure t the eyes. The poses and the set however was disappointing! Another one on a chair or too many parcels.
Thursday, July 14th, 2016 on Kelyra
Set is ok! She is beautiful!
Friday, June 24th, 2016 on Asuica
Friday, June 24th, 2016 on Presenting Tammi Lee
Friday, June 24th, 2016 on Comara
I would have to agree with statement. I am a wisher. You would have seen me write a year ago this was the best site anyone could ever find. Now I am just a wisher hoping those days will come back before I am gone.
Saturday, June 18th, 2016 on Pendia
Wow, I stand corrected. I did not realize that seeing a woman sitting in a chair or standing next to a chair was the end all to you. I really did like the dismember statement. You are probably the viewer that prefers the focused shots on certain parts of the body instead of the entire body. Then possibly you are the photographer who took these so called boring sets. Yes, I happen to be a person who enjoys getting what I am paying for, not settling for oh well maybe the next one will be better!
Thursday, June 16th, 2016 on Pendia
Met-Art keeping up with the 1:15 ratio. Same problem, you look at one set you have seen almost all of them. I see the sets posted and get excited that I see some of the most beautiful woman on Met-Art, but then you ope the set and it is the same poses. In a chair, on the beach, spending half the time hiding behind something, or in a bathtub.
Wednesday, June 15th, 2016 on Pendia
Now, this is an awesome set all around!
Friday, June 10th, 2016 on Enplau
Met-Art is keeping p with the 1:15 ratio. This was the one good set in a long time!
Tuesday, June 7th, 2016 on Derais
This was a terrible set!
Tuesday, June 7th, 2016 on Presenting Sheana
Ok, she is back, however, there was maybe ten good pics out of the lot! Same old same old. Let's cut parts of her body out of almost every shot.
Friday, May 6th, 2016 on Ektara
No, it is a one for the set. The model should be beautiful because she is on Met Art. The set was terrible.
Thursday, April 28th, 2016 on Raasen
See, this is a set that is worth the money and time checking for.
Wednesday, April 27th, 2016 on Cicina
See, this set defines what standard Met-Art used to have for its members. You have one of the most beautiful woman in the world posing in a setting that draws on every viewer's hopes and dreams. Met-Art has been posting an average of possibly 1 out of 16 sets that come even close to this quality. I wish there were more viewers out there in cyber world that would agree with me. I have been wanting to cancel my membership, but I will be the first to admit, love a beautiful woman! Each day I check out the sets posted, glad today I got to see the one that does not disappoint me. I guess I have to wait for 15 more before the next unbelievable set!
Thursday, April 21st, 2016 on Veten
I am so gal there are others out there that share my opinion. Are you kidding me. I think some people jus look at the fact they get a chance to see a beautiful naked woman and forget they are still paying for it. The set was terrible. There were very few pics that showed her beauty the way it should have been shared. I almost agree with boring, however, she is a beautiful naked woman. I was disappointed in not being able to fully admire her beauty. Met-Art has been falling short for a long time and is about to lose my business.
Saturday, April 16th, 2016 on Presenting Lucy Doll
Met Art has been posting too many of these sets. I could not agree with you more.
Sunday, April 10th, 2016 on Neiosi
She is beautiful, quality of the set terrible. I did not see one photo that was completely focused. Less than disappointing1
Monday, February 22nd, 2016 on Celtini
See, this is MetArt! This set was a clear example of perfection. You could not ask for a better start of the day.
Monday, January 11th, 2016 on Eldana
Still no! I want the wow back in Met-Art. I do not want to open a set and find myself saying "Ok!"
Friday, January 1st, 2016 on Rinetz
Friday, January 1st, 2016 on Luxira
She is in a tree, give me a break. If I was walking and came upon a naked girl in a tree, I would without a doubt check her out and then think it was weird. Not good at all.
Wednesday, December 30th, 2015 on Teilora
You are right about the sand and getting dirty. I like a girl who is not afraid of getting dirty, but just not in a set when I am trying to admire her beauty.
Wednesday, December 9th, 2015 on Kaneya
Get out of the water scenes.
Sunday, November 29th, 2015 on Esane
I would write everything you wrote about Mia D. However, I do not feel the same way towards this set. I am just not a water set guy.
Saturday, November 28th, 2015 on Panisa
Terrible set! Lighting, poses, . . . The only good part was the model.
Saturday, November 28th, 2015 on Posiva
Could not agree more with the too many props!
Thursday, November 26th, 2015 on Laboki
The word is "Wow!" Never have I wished I could transport myself to a different location so much before. Perfection at its highest level!
Tuesday, November 24th, 2015 on Rinola
See, now I like this set. To me it seems more of the fantasy you are looking for when viewing a beautiful woman. You want to imagine yourself being part of the set. When all you have are close-up photos, it does not have that effect. I think this set is one of the reasons I joined Met-Art.
Wednesday, November 18th, 2015 on Sinca
Arkisi, When you are taking a photo why would you make half of the photo out of focus? In my opinion it ruined the best set of the day. Met-Art is falling apart lately with its posts! Another mostly crap day at Met-Art.
Monday, November 16th, 2015 on Tuttele
Monday, November 16th, 2015 on Erilea
See, this is a perfect set. There are many different settings that make a perfect set and this is one of them. When you look at a set and you wish you were there or it would never end, then you know you have a perfect set. There were pics for those of you who like close-ups and many full shots that I like. Thank you Barbara Vie for sharing, and thank you Arkisi for the set!
Friday, November 6th, 2015 on Mosidy
Sorry, I am way out there in my point of view. Thought the set could have been great, however, way too slow. The pics were not revealing enough to me. Oh, well!
Friday, November 6th, 2015 on Lanei
L have to write that Lauren Crist is by far one of my favorite models. Horrible set!
Thursday, November 5th, 2015 on Vintra
Maybe five good poses out of the whole set. Leonardo you used to be one of those names when I saw it I would think this is without a doubt going to be a good set. Hiding around a door frame for almost every pic to me is not what I look forward to. You used to be one of the people who took the best pics.
Tuesday, November 3rd, 2015 on Fitula
Now, Catherine, this was a good set. Beautiful poses and Ledina is always unbelievable!
Tuesday, November 3rd, 2015 on Davica
Model beautiful, poor quality pics!
Saturday, October 17th, 2015 on Dearc
I agree with your thoughts on this set. I would like to step the comment up a little more. I feel lately MetArt has been posting below their typical level of sets. I find that I am feeling more disappointed after each set. Been a member for years, thinking of moving away!
Wednesday, October 14th, 2015 on Cynia
Beautiful model! However, maybe four good pics in the whole set. I can not believe that viewers prefer having most of the pics zoomed in so you can not see the entire body. Met-Art is allowing more and more sets like this current one. I guess I am one of the few viewers that realizes you can do that on your personal computer, but you can not zoom back out on a close-up pic already.
Thursday, September 24th, 2015 on Panazo
I wish other people would have my same opinion on this topic. The woman is perfect. The poses were perfect. The outfit was perfect. The quality of the photos were crap! Are you looking at the photos full size, because they are not focused. They are crap! Do love her though!
Tuesday, April 29th, 2014 on Manzana
Let's just get to the point, she is a goddess. Jenya is the reason why I came to MetArt. I would agree with all who have written, any chance to see her is a better day!
Tuesday, March 26th, 2013 on Halkyone
See, this is what I am writing about when I am saying that we need to see the whole body. This was a great set all around!
Friday, July 18th, 2014 on Anirke
A couple of photos with the horse is nice. The entire set not so nice. Just do not prefer this style of a set. Love her as always.
Friday, March 28th, 2014 on Atti
Really, I think that some of you people only need to see a photo of any part of a naked woman and you would write, "OH, WOW the best photo in the world!" The model is beautiful, however, the poses in this set give it a four at best. Disappointing! Let's get on board with each other and agree that there should be more full body shots at high resolution and you people can zoom in on your partial shots.
Thursday, July 17th, 2014 on Anarti
The only disappointing part about this set is there wasn't more.
Monday, February 3rd, 2014 on Parura
See, now this is a perfect setting for a beautiful woman to be photographed! More like it.
Wednesday, January 15th, 2014 on Izenaku
Candice, looking good! Leonardo what is happening to your skills? Look at the quality of the photos at full size. Are you kidding me, horrible.
Sunday, January 12th, 2014 on Orysa
Mia, Please stop losing so much weight. You are a beautiful woman and there is no reason for you to lose weight.
Friday, December 27th, 2013 on Enotta
Just not a beach set guy. There have been some, but very few. She on the other hand is wonderful!
Tuesday, May 7th, 2013 on Vestur
Beautiful new model, sad the set is not the same quality.
Sunday, April 14th, 2013 on Presenting Elsa
I agree that every inch of Mila is perfect. Her face is equally beautiful as the rest of her body. The fruit does not do anything for me. I wish the poses were better also. She is always one of the 10 plus models!
Wednesday, March 12th, 2014 on Melono
This woman and set is what I am talking about!
Sunday, April 19th, 2015 on Lenida
Seriously, I do not get it. How can you write what you just did about this set? You are encouraging the same type of set in the future. Read what some of the other members have written. I agree with them. DISAPPOINTING, TO SAY THE LEAST.....
Saturday, May 3rd, 2014 on Naisunta
This set is a waste of a perfect body. Very few good pics.
Friday, January 31st, 2014 on Achelly
I agree, but I do not prefer the bathtub pics. I want to see her entire body all the time.
Friday, October 25th, 2013 on Veneratie
Sunday, August 25th, 2013 on Subida
I do not prefer this style of photography. Almost every photo is a small portion of Gillian's body. I understand you want the camera to focus on certain parts of her body. I would rather be able to do that with my eyes not with the zooming in with the camera. This method of photography takes away the chance of viewing the entire body. I am an admirer of the female body, I love looking at the body as a whole. I just like my eyes picking what part to zoom in on, and not having the camera do it for me. That is why high resolution is better than zoom solution!
Tuesday, March 26th, 2013 on Krullen
Leonardo, you have one of the best models in the world on the other side of your lenses and the camera is not focused. There are too many photos when zoomed closer, they are out of focus. Mia is something to look forward to, and then to be disappointed.
Monday, May 11th, 2015 on Derun
Saturday, May 4th, 2013 on Centro
Never been a fan of the bathtub or shower sets! Helen is always unbelievable!
Thursday, May 7th, 2015 on Untai
Words kind not describe such perfection!
Tuesday, April 21st, 2015 on Loaze
There has to be a number higher than 10! Melena is just unbelievable in every way.
Thursday, February 12th, 2015 on Ezemble
I would totally disagree with these comments. Both girls are serving a purpose. When one girl is in a provocative pose, the other seems to be assisting her. There is nothing more arousing than two beautiful woman in this style or setting. The chemistry is obviously there in those smiles.
Thursday, October 10th, 2013 on Nedenle
Thursday, October 10th, 2013 on Presenting Margaret
The woman yes, the set no!
Thursday, September 12th, 2013 on Tassa
Astrud is without a doubt one of the best models. I just wish the set was worthy of her beauty, could have been better.
Sunday, September 1st, 2013 on Sobretor
This was a disappointing set. The word is disappointing! When I see Amelie has blessed us with her beauty and then it was abused by Leonardo, it was disappointing.
Tuesday, May 14th, 2013 on Antigo
I agree with every comment personally about her, however, I think that we get so caught up in her beauty that we do not realize that there are very few of the pics that have good poses. The ones that are out of this world distract us from the many that are not.
Tuesday, May 7th, 2013 on Valoro
I agree with gswkJu, although, I think that the set could have been better. Astrud is worthy of the visit to the site due to her wonderful beauty.
Saturday, March 23rd, 2013 on Europi
Lauren Crist never disappointing. This set, very disappointing!
Friday, April 17th, 2015 on Zoneva
Prima appears to be a beautiful woman, I would be certain if the the pics were in focus. I like the mood of the setting, but the lighting has to allow a well focused pic. Prima, I can tell without a doubt your shape lets me know of your beauty. I would love to have seen more pics where your entire body was focused. Sorry!
Sunday, March 22nd, 2015 on Presenting Prima
I hope that I am reading your last line correctly, because I could not agree more with the full picture. However, I would change it just a little by adding there needs to be full pictures all the time. I will never understand why a person needs such a closeup when in today's world of tech you can zoom in on your own. A woman's whole body needs to be admired all at once. The way the good Lord has made it such a masterpiece. Your eyes searching the canvas for every detail not being disappointed because you ran out of canvas. I agree with your other concerns as well my fellow admirer of good art.
Sunday, September 21st, 2014 on Presenting Assoli
This is just a "No!" That says it all for me.
Tuesday, July 15th, 2014 on Presenting Dalia
See, this is an example of a perfect set. The poses, lighting, the focus . . . I could never say enough about this set. It is the reason I am a Met-Art member. I just wish they were more like this one!
Wednesday, March 19th, 2014 on Mettun
She used to be refreshing! Anna has lost so much weight that I fear for her. I am just sad towards the set itself. Boring!
Sunday, November 24th, 2013 on Gorria
This is probably Catherine's best work I have ever seen from her. I would give this set a 9.7 out of 10.
Saturday, October 19th, 2013 on Suonanao
I thought this set was very nicely completed. I would rather had in her more in the shade so some parts of the photos were too bright. However, great set!
Wednesday, October 9th, 2013 on Duab
I agree with your statement concerning Amelie. I would actually stress it a little stronger. However, I disagree with your third statement, it is not alright. Leonardo once again has produced a set that is not his usual quality. We wait for models like Amelie to be posted. I think it is wrong to be disappointed with pics that look exactly the same. When you are looking at the set and you are hoping the next page is better, then it is disappointing!
Monday, September 30th, 2013 on Bunli
I could anyone be bored seeing Jenya. She is like a bottle of the best wine you could ever taste, priceless!
Thursday, August 29th, 2013 on Firmo
I do not know the name of the official style of the photos. I would simply say they are out of focus or soft. I do not like these photos at all. Love the model
Friday, August 2nd, 2013 on Presenting Leonda
Helen is perfect! The set could have been better. I always get disappointed when there are not more full body pics. I just love the entire female body, especially hers.
Tuesday, June 18th, 2013 on Desexo
The set, not the model!
Wednesday, May 8th, 2013 on Enteiro
Could have been a set that would be a standard setter. Instead it was "OK." Both models are out of this world beautiful!
Thursday, July 2nd, 2015 on Fullate
Terrible, go look at sunflowers at a nature site.
Saturday, June 27th, 2015 on Oraia
There are no words but perfect that describe this set and Starlet.
Tuesday, June 9th, 2015 on Myrtone
You place two of the most beautiful women on Met Art in the same set. I can not complain about anything. Next set with Michaela Isizzu & Sabrisse A needs to be in the bedroom. Please, please keep them coming!
Tuesday, May 26th, 2015 on Gleice
Sapphira A has not had one bad set, which I would think could not be possible. She is a goddess of beauty, who has the power to rule!
Wednesday, June 11th, 2014 on Yavude
ergo, I could not agree more! You have a light skinned blonde hair beautiful woman, in front of a sunny window, and on white bed sheets. Hello!
Thursday, March 27th, 2014 on Nirina
The women are out of this world beautiful and I love seeing them together, however, the posing could have been better! When you get past that you are excited to see them together, kind of ok not wow.
Thursday, November 21st, 2013 on Polla
Tuesday, November 5th, 2013 on Laea
Friday, October 25th, 2013 on Kelavu
How will I ever be able to fall asleep after viewing this set! That's right, I will be able to dream of these three women together. Ariel Piper Fawn & Indiana A & Lorena B are easily part of the top ten of MetArt. This was truly a treat!
Sunday, September 29th, 2013 on Pandan
She is by far what dreams are made of!
Sunday, September 22nd, 2013 on Vesen
Great work all around! Love Macy B. as a model.
Wednesday, August 14th, 2013 on Diafano
Your set has a softness about it that brings out the beauty of your models. However, I do not prefer the style of the photo where you do not capture the entire body of your model. There are very few of your photos where you can see the complete beauty of the woman being presented.
Monday, July 15th, 2013 on Grisial
Catherine, it is nice that you are taking the time to write comments back to us. In my opinion your sets seem to have the same poses, and the girls seem up tight. When a set is in the planning stage, who chooses the setting and the mood of the set. I love to see the woman of MetArt in natural poses that easily leads to a man's imagination to desire to be there with that model. I do not mind some close-up shots, but I enjoy seeing the woman's entire body. If someone likes the extreme close-up, let them zoom in on their desired focus. I enjoy the softness or the gentleness of your photos. Just a thought, Ingoodtaste
Sunday, May 26th, 2013 on Presenting Caroline
I am typically a Leonardo supporter, but I can not find any words of support for this set. Elle, what a waste of a beautiful woman!
Saturday, April 20th, 2013 on Italien
"Uninspiring" don't half cover it, Mate --
Elucidate, please... I'm sure Leonardo needs all the help he can get to try to straighten things out (pardon the pun 🤭) for you.
Yes, Kika, "sits by the light of the window" ..and it ruins all the photographs. Too bad. Superlative and richly expressive model is wasted.
Thursday, February 8th, 2018 on Meeta
Many of the artists don't provide enough full body shots, CL included. I agree with you, I merely pointed out a few that were there. And yes, I often love his models more than his photography.
What? Full body, like 92-97, 133-135? I'm not big on CL, but this set is good, a nice mix of poses and better picture quality than many of his other sets. And Riley Anne is very pretty with many fine attributes. This set does her justice.
(Ingoodtaste) This photographer along with leanardo and a couple of others, nearly always come up with goods. However, as you say, the good sets are too far apart with lots of sub-standard tat sandwiched in between. The MA site as a whole would benefit greatly if the less able photographers either upped ther game or left.
what drugs are you on?
Tuesday, October 3rd, 2017 on Presenting Jia Lissa
What??? No comment on her muddy, dirty, grubby skin tones????
Thursday, April 27th, 2017 on Presenting Sydney Wolf
There is a person approving every set K and she does a good job of giving us variety. You need to remember there are all types represented in our membership and there is a vocal bunch that cries that there isn't enough art in Metart and they too must be placated.
There are lots of sets that I don't like but there are even more that I do. It's a tall order to please everyone all the time. Personally I like is set. I like the vivid contrasts and bright colors. The dark background really makes the model stand out and Matiss does a good job of insuring we get the well focused closeups I crave.
I think they got it about right. I hate when there are too many far away shots and not enough medium-closeup shots.
extremely and shockingly or distressingly bad or serious : a terrible crime | terrible pain.
• causing or likely to cause terror; sinister : the stranger gave a terrible smile.
• of extremely poor quality : the terrible conditions in which the ordinary people lived.
• [ attrib. ] informal used to emphasize the extent of something unpleasant or bad : what a terrible mess.
• extremely incompetent or unskillful : she is terrible at managing her money.
• [as complement ] feeling or looking extremely unwell : I was sick all night and felt terrible for two solid days.
• [as complement ] (of a person or their feelings) troubled or guilty : Maria felt terrible because she had forgotten the woman's name.
It's quite curious to say the least that you find that "[Diana's body is] hidden by leaves...". Myself, as well as others, don't seem to see it "hidden by leaves".
As for the other two stipulations in your same line, from them I must infer that you'd prefer your women presented in an environment such as most often found in "studio" sets. While such sets _can_ at time, depending on how they're done, be quite nice, they can often be seen as quite dehumanizing. I think that if you look at the ratings for the sets, you'll find the ones done outside of a simple studio background, often garner much higher ratings, depending of course on how they're done.
And to say that, not only me, but others who choose to post more than one or two-word comments are "..bag[s] of hot air with very little taste." is just plain smarmy in the extreme. Perhaps you might want to adjust your statements when addressing not only me, but other members in the future instead of making blanket statements about a member's "taste".
Just a suggestion...
Your comment or your monitor?
The statement you make is a waste of effort and electromagnetic energy. Other than the fact that it says you don't like the set, it imparts no real information as to what's wrong. It gives neither Matiss, nor any of us, any real tangible information as to why or what makes you feel what's "wrong" or how it could have been done any better.
Might as well have just posted "blue"... about as descriptive, informative and helpful. Reminds me a lot of the member who keeps posting the silly "Ok" in the set's TAGS field.
There are surely any number of other sets of Suzanna both here on MetArt and on other sites that would certainly fulfill your desires.
Me... any time Suzanna shows up is a time for joy on my part.
"the worst set we have seen on this site"? I think that's a little harsh. Personally, I've seen hundreds of "worse sets". I agree that the overall set should have had more variety, but I actually thought a handful of these shots were quite nice.
I must agree!
Please elaborate that next time. Simply saying "no" looks like you're rejecting everything about the set, including the model. Detailed feedback is always helpful.
What? C'mon, Its Candice. Not even a maybe for one of our favorite ladies?
I could think of many words for her, and no is not one of them.
I would tend to agree with your assessment but still... Li Moon is so sexy. Reminds me of all the sexy girls I saw when I lived in Shanghai.
Please explain 1:15.
And why is full body an issue? I can see all I want to, and this set is a masterpiece.
I must say that Amalie is so beautiful she ALMOST equals our Rose. ALMOST, I said.I always have to give her a 10 to infinity for beauty of face and figure.Leonardo had a good concepton the opening page, but ran it into the ground He gets a 10 ++ for effort " Can't win them all as losers always say"
Ha ha! Nope, I prefer shots that show the nice bits AND the face, I don't like too many closeup shots because there's no context. For me, the context is the model's face and expressions and the overall lines of her body. Sorry to disappoint... (:
As for getting what I'm paying for... I feel that I get that almost every single day here. For me, my ratio is about the opposite of yours, i.e. 15 satisfying sets for one that I don't care much for.
Maybe I'm just simple and too easy to please.
Guess what though? I'm pleased... (; Almost every single day. Else, what would be the point of having a subscription to MA? Other than just the pleasure of bitching, I guess?
"the same poses" ? Srsly, dude?
The only possible way to get a greater variety of poses than are shown in the "pages" of MA would be to physically dismember these poor models, who get into quite extreme contortions for our viewing pleasure, and then some members complain about the poses!
Now, perhaps you are a photographer, and perhaps you have derived a fantastic way of invoking the fourth or fifth dimensions in your pictures, such that if you shot an erotic set, you'd really have some new, non-boring poses to demonstrate for us?
Wow... and I thought I was turning into a tough customer... I find something every day that I like and usually two or three of the sets trip my trigger. I don't know what I'd do if I had to wait 15 sets for one that works for me.
Disagree for reasons I gave above
Could you use a bit more of the English language and maybe say _why_ the set was "Terrible"? That way, if Ms. Schon's reading the comments, she knows what to change in future sets to please you.
Not a problem, Each of us has personal likes and dislikes. I can understand that completely. Bathtub and shower sets do nothing for me either but natural sets like this are fine as long as the water is not used a form of clothing to hide her lovely details. For me though Mia is allowed all sorts of exceptions because she is just plain exceptional!
because a shallow depht of focus is actually more natural. A picture that is 'in focus' everywhere looks like a cheaply made bad DAZ render.
Tuesday, November 17th, 2015 on Tuttele
I'm in total agreement!
Agree. I know the photographer thinks it's artistic, but I find that it very annoying in photos of people. If the photographer wants to throw in a couple of those artsy starts blurry photos fine, but this set contains far too many of them and it detracted from the gorgeous model. Especially disappointed in the photos with her feet against the wall.
Thanx, Ingoodtaste, we all appreciate your constructive criticism.
I'll second that.
Now that is the way to pose: in many different positions, different angles, close-up and full body views, unobstructed and not blurry giving a clear view. Combined with the technical mastery which Checkers points out, this is a perfect set !
Totally agree. Great set. Great model.
Actually, when I see the name Leonardo I know that little other than the model's face will be in focus throughout the set, and this one is no exception.
Very well said. I have to agree with you unfortunately. I also associate Leonardo's name with anticipating a set with great clear poses and beautiful content. Not so much anymore....
Leonardo, go back to your roots.
I totally agree, I came back to check why there were none of this set in my collection of the fabulously beautiful Divina. Why MA even bothered to present this set is puzzling, surely they check the quality of what they present.
Monday, August 17th, 2015 on Manzana
What is/are the missing element(s), Ingoodtaste? What is it that makes this an OK set rather than a standard setter?
Me, too... I hate to write a negative review, but see my comment below...
Wednesday, June 24th, 2015 on Ambelu
I'll try next time to take a picture of the city too.
Sunday, May 31st, 2015 on Dolome
I think I need eyeglasses after trying to view this set. Generally I enjoy a Leonardo set with great presentation and posing. However, this is the worst focus to date. It seams the artist doesn't listen and evolve from feedback comments.
Hmmm... I don't know about that. To me it was like picking up a piece of glass and realizing it was a diamond – a very welcome surprise :-)
Tuesday, April 28th, 2015 on Tirrep
Without question, the least favorite set of one of my top 10 MA models.
This set is the only one I really enjoyed today.
I liked it, so what did I miss? Please specify your disappointment(s).
At 9.10 currently it is evidently not disappointing to the majority. This is the good side of Leonardo in this set, IMO.
Monday, March 9th, 2015 on Ezeble
You do know that color film is not better at all and for maximal resolution, maximal contrast or maximal sensitivity you HAD to use black&white?
You do know that decades after the introduction of colour film, portraits were still shot in black&white because it made people look more beautiful?
No, I am afraid you do not.
Monday, March 9th, 2015 on Olenea
Thumbs down!!!!The Seller
What was disappointing? If you don't give him any information about what disappointed you, he can't improve those things in future sets.
"Stop making me pay for black and white pics!"
Do you know why this statement makes no sense, Ingoodtaste?
Davi always gives us at least 120 color photos and then, after a FULL color photo set, THEN he adds on the B&Ws and desats.
With Davi, you almost always get MORE than you paid for.
Plus, if you REALLY REALLY hate B&W photos, you don't HAVE to look at them. Look at the full set of color pics... then stop looking.
I hope that makes you feel at least a tiny bit better.
Ingoodtaste, It should be clear by now that members pay for up to 120 photos because that's the maximum amount of photos that photographers also get paid for. This means that the extra photos from #121 onward are all for FREE, so you don't pay for them, they are a bonus you are free to take or leave, and as long as there is even just one member who appreciates my "free gift" I will keep on including it in my sets, for my own freedom of expression.
I could comment about your consideration of black & white photography but I can't explain over a century of photography in few words, especially to those like you who seem to have no idea about what photography is, so I'll just take note that you think that "colored" photos are "better".
P.S. Thanks God Helmut Newton and a few others didn't quite think the same.
all time high?
Your eyes are really, really bad, aren't they?
Sunday, March 8th, 2015 on Nohay
I second that.
Thursday, March 5th, 2015 on Sinelua
If you subtract the monochrome out of the 163 total, you would have a large set of over 120 color photos. We did not loose anything by having the monochrome photos in this set. Indeed, the monochrome photos were an elegant bonus, a gift from a very talented artist.
Wednesday, December 10th, 2014 on Devane
Ingoodtaste, Edwige's skin is not actually so light as you may think, she actually is darked than the typical Czech girl and lightly tanned most of the year, especially in the summer.
Backlit photography tends to produce images lighter than normal, since you have to expose the photos more if you want to see something of the model out of the natural shadow coming from the back, unless you use strong frontal lighting which actually totally changes the style meant for this setting.
I don't know what you mean exactly with the quality of the photos, I am actually quite satisfied with it, unless you refer to the style choices, but then it's a different matter and you should use different words.
If you don't like black and white photos you could just stop at pic #134, the last photo in full color, after viewing more than the standard 120 pics for a set. Black & whites are mostly for photography connoisseurs and those who also love Photography as a form of art and not just a media for showing beautiful naked women, so you have choice.
Saturday, December 6th, 2014 on Fretha
Speak for yourself, Ingoodtaste... that may be how YOU remember our artists, but it most certainly is not how I remember them. ( :
Friday, December 5th, 2014 on Rendat
You have the basic part right but I don't agree about ALL full body thus my comment about balance. Contrary to your thinking simply zooming it is not a good substitute for nicely focused closeups. Full body shots don't tend to do well when zoomed in.
My point was that this set has a very strong bias toward pussy shots and not much of anything else. I cannot understand why artists insist on starting out without panties then doing dozens of pussy shots with the top on before removing it. In a normal strip the last thing off is the panties and it is done with an appropriate amount of teasing. Balance means just that. A nice mix of near and far and some nice facials, upper body shots, rear shots, standing siting laying down ect. This set had only one focal point throughout and the ending part REALLY drove this in! 15 gyno shots in a row with almost no change. After the top came off at #63 there were 3 glamor shots 63, 64, 65 and after that it was nothing crotch shots with the exception of 91, 96, 114 and 115.
Sorry – must disagree. I think this is Mia's best set for some time
Tuesday, September 16th, 2014 on Scinea
Sunday, September 14th, 2014 on Achelly
Hi Ingoodtaste) I will consider your suggestions for future work.
Thursday, August 28th, 2014 on Presenting Kai
A hearty concurrence from me.
I'm always in for full body shots, esp. showing the female hourglass form in its entirety.
Friday, July 18th, 2014 on Anarti
Totally agree. The window setting could be good, but the back-lighting seems to be overpowering. Maybe hang a gauze outside the window next time to reduce the light coming in ?
Sunday, July 13th, 2014 on Smyana
Agreed. Lorena always looks gorgeous, but less so in this set.
Friday, June 27th, 2014 on Undoren
Seems you could use a bit more patience...;o)
Tuesday, June 17th, 2014 on Presenting Xena
Hi Ingoodtaste) You have expressed an interesting remark. I will accept note of these remarks in the future work. Thank you)
Totally agree! Just about every picture of this Divine Angel is out of focus!
Sunday, May 25th, 2014 on Manzana
Wednesday, May 21st, 2014 on Tonkina
Tis best to be dreaming while awake, it seems. What with millioms of Rylsky monsters swarming the night scene.
Sunday, May 18th, 2014 on Obinco
Not Rylsky's fault!! Blame it on those puritanical shit-heads at M-A. They saw his previous set, and Venere's obvious excitement, and told him to tone it down. That's why this set is so bloody deplorable.
These models and photographers should remember that without our subscriptions, who is going to pay the rent? The power, the telephone, the internet et all?
Stuff it, who pays the wages at M-A? Where does the money come from?? Where does the money come from to pay the photographers and models.
From us, their subscribers, that's where!! And those dictatorial Nazi dick-licking puritanical poofter clods haven't gotten their bullshit morality off the Mayflower yet!!!
Monday, May 12th, 2014 on Agbaye
Agreed. Divina is one of my very favorites, and I want to see every detail of her perfect body. I suspect these may all have been razzed up from files normally too small for Met-Art. That's my guess, anyway.
Friday, May 9th, 2014 on Manzana
So Roger is in conflict with the Revealed Truth, and, worse, he's off-message in this negotiation with the powers that be? Who, of course, are looking for any excuse to tip over into artiness and completely avoid showing nudity, as the other sets today demonstrate. :-)
I liked this set a lot. Imagine that you're on the beach with your very beautiful girlfriend. She's wearing her favorite dress and looks radiantly happy to be with you, and in the mood to play. There's nobody else around for now, but somebody could always show up, so she has to keep the dress on. Still, she's taking chances in a public place, because you're so involved with each other that you don't care too much what other people think. It's a pleasant, sexy mood, more "Think what will happen when we get back" than immediate gratification.
Sure, it might not work for you, but as of today there are 14,320 other sets to look at. I wouldn't say that every set from now on should look like this, but there's no possibility that they will, anyway, so why get excited? Variety is good.
Thanks for this set, K, and for everything else you do.
One man's opinion...
Do we all "have" to agree on every set??
Is it possible somebody just might like this??
Do they have the right??
For the sake of "good taste", "to each his own"...;o)
Ingoodtaste, I agree with you completely
This out of focus spoiled the whole thing for me - what a pity because it could have been a vey sexy set.
Saturday, May 3rd, 2014 on Manzana
I think a lot of people have the same opinion as you. Beautiful everything except the photos themselves. There was another example over on SexArt today. Focus Focus Focus and make sure the 'Center Of Attention' in the photo is focused!
@ ingoodtaste: Mike Myers and I agree with you.
Saturday, April 5th, 2014 on Krullen
I agree completely. Met Art should have a "rate the photographer" as well. Some of these women might get as good of scores as they deserve because the photographer did a terrible job. I have a hard time justifying paying for out of focus pictures.
Saturday, April 5th, 2014 on Jalera
I agree, throwing in some standing shots and a few different poses would've been nice, especially when you have two lovely ladies with such awesome figures!
Wednesday, April 2nd, 2014 on Segnale
Hi Ingoodtaste. I'm sorry that you do not like my job.
Saturday, March 29th, 2014 on Presenting Xola
Good point about the high expectations (or standards) some models arouse. I think Sapphira and others get cut a lot of slack, mediocre sets of theirs being automatically applauded, but I can think of a couple of models where the opposite seems to occur. They are so outstanding that their sets often let people down. They want more than they are getting, and so give lower scores...
Tuesday, March 25th, 2014 on Debitat
Hi Ingoodtaste) Thank you for the great appreciation of our work) of Course, the scene is not always allows to model full growth. Probably, I do not inclined to shoot not close up. I agree with you that this is not correct. I will remember your words and take them into account in future work.
Thursday, March 13th, 2014 on Repriza
Ingoodtaste, I see what you're saying, but the thing is, except for the lighting/background thing, I really like what Alessandro does. I am not negatively critical because I hope he'll read our comments and figure out how to do what he wants to do ~ I suspect, bring out a soft and warm feel in his sets ~ without losing his models against a very light background.
As for Malinda, well, she gets a 10 either way. ( : What a sweet looking young lady... I'd love to spend a lazy weekend with her, drinking morning coffee, lazing around the bedroom (LOL) all day after cooking a leisurely breakfast together... maybe taking a walk together in the afternoon/evening...
Tuesday, March 11th, 2014 on Puras
...well... to be fair... she is incredibly good looking. And she's naked. ( ;
Monday, March 3rd, 2014 on Presenting Adel
agree with ingoodtaste 100%
Sunday, March 2nd, 2014 on Presenting Adel
I agree with both of you. I'd love to see a set or two of Alessandra shot indoors. Preferably, a bedroom set. ( :
Saturday, February 22nd, 2014 on Leytte
I counted at least 30, and I excluded every one where I noticed a missing part. (and there were lots of missing toes).
Wednesday, February 19th, 2014 on Diody
Agreed, I think this is my favorite Sofi set for quite some time.
Tuesday, February 4th, 2014 on Parura
Well then I would have to agree with you...
Tuesday, January 21st, 2014 on Oihana
I disagree with you about the background. With Sapphira's overall tan and long, dark hair, the blown out background lighting makes a perfect, non-distractig background as well as providing a great light source for a couple of large surface reflectors placed beside the photographer to bounce light back into Sapphira's figure. I think it's a well-done example of a partial high-key lit subject.
Tuesday, January 21st, 2014 on Coeta
Candice can do miracles and she needs to do one in finding a new photographer. I guess even Leonardo has bad days but I think that staying with just one photographer can get stale and in a rut. I would like to see some more sexynest from Candice.
Thursday, December 19th, 2013 on Presenting Monica
I'm a Divina person, too. I'll gladly look at her wherever she may be. She has some inside sets, but most are outside.
Thursday, December 12th, 2013 on Valioso
The MetArt network uses your email address to send you more information about our products/services, events, news and offers.
You can unsubscribe at any time by using the unsubscribe link located in our emails we send you.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2018 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.