Hey, people. I like Your enthusiasm for girls from USA, but according the looks and nickname, she's originally from Slavic speaking countries, just living in the States. And I need to say, that my rating system is just a little bit more complicated, then the others. I'm considering not only the model's appearance, but also creativity and professionality in posing style, surroundings and of course, the picture's quality in photo sets. And the last factor is the reason, why I will rate all models photographed by such an amateur as Lightfoot is, only 1, the lowest possible rating. I never saw such pieces of crap, what he's showing to us on full sized photos. So, Elena, if You want higher score from me, switch this random photographer to some real-deal artist.
Monday, November 28th, 2016 on Elena Koshka
Checkers, I definitely don't find ironic, that my comment is approximately as long as Berenice's bio, because her bio is two times longer, as longest bios of other models, I saw on MetArt, before Berenice arrived. That's the reason, why I find length of it too weird. Nobody is curious about her complete family background, hobbies or interests. I don't want to repeat myself, but as I wrote. This kind of bio accurately fits for dating site, not for nude modeling focused one. I'm not criticising, what's her bio about in general. I just want to say, that she confused target group of people and she gave perfectly written bio on the wrong place.
Rose, if You actually wanted, then why You didn't went ahead long time ago and why You didn't deleted my comment yet? Don't try to convince me, that You didn't do it just because You wanted to embarrass myself. Expression of my opinion about Berenice's bio and appearance is freedom of speech, one of basic human rights. You embarrassed Yourself not only in mine, but in eyes of all normal people, just with mentioning of possibility of deleting my comment. If You will do it, it will be censorship. The fact is, that since I read it, I seriously started to doubt, if payed membership on website with such employees, as You're, really worth my money.
Rich, I never wrote, that bio isn't important at all. I've got total different mind, how long and what should be bios about. From my point of view, we need to read only some basic, and in addition brief characteristics of girls written by themselves. You mentioned models with no bio. I think, that's OK to have no bio in order either to protect privacy, or just stay arcane and support this way men's fantasies about them, according to their looks, posing style and surroundings in photo sets. Last but not least, if You want some real-deal deep-sh*t, then visit Caprice A comments section and read, what StreetGlide13 wrote about her.
Tuesday, October 25th, 2016 on Berenice
Lena, sorry for my rude honesty, but I don't care, how nice You're, or what You can do in front of camera. Once You will be photographed by such an amateur, as Lightfoot is, I will rate You with lowest possible score. Not because of Yourself, but because of extremely poor quality of full sized photos. It totally ruins all of Your potential. I've got photographing only as a hobby. I was able to shoot with this league of cameras, MetArt Photographers are using and I never did such a pieces of crap, as is Lightfoot showing to us in every single photo set. Switch him, who is just random photographer from the huge crowd to someone, who can be considered as a real artist, and I will change my mind about Your rating.
Friday, October 7th, 2016 on Lena Anderson
Caprice is one of the best models on MetArt. It was so sad to see her wiped out of top 10 for such a long time. I seriously doubted about taste of majority of members, who kept her rated so low. I'm really happy, that the queen is finally back, where she belongs. The biggest paradox is, that especially sets from last 3 years, when she was out of top 10, are showing her development from pure perfection, to ultimate legend.
Marketa, You're doing Your best, so let's keep it that way!
Saturday, July 2nd, 2016 on Caprice A
Lily always made observable improvements in every important aspects from shoot to shoot. She's bringing every single time new, more heating and provoking poses, phizogs, smiles and sights. And in addition, she behaves like non plus ultra professional in front of camera. One of solid evidences of her overall maturation is her new shorter haircut. She's looking much more adult and serious just because of it. It's really interesting, how can small detail open a lot of new possibilities as for her, as for photographers.
Lily is bright shinning example of model, who enjoys her job so much, that she's showing approaches to erotic art, which weren't seen yet. It naturally made ultimate MetArt super model from her, no matter how she was, is or will be rated. It was very sad to saw her rated so low for such a long time. She definitely isn't part of regular model's crowd. Her well deserved place is in top 10. We, who are able to recognize true beauty, can only hope for many more of her new sets and videos and her top 10, in an ideal case absolute number 1 rating.
Friday, March 18th, 2016 on Lily C
Only one logical reason for writting so uselessly long bio is misunderstanding of focus of this page, which is clearly defined as erotic. Leave your life story for dating site, where detailed bio is base of success in finding boyfriend, who will perfectly match your ideals.
If you're claiming, that nude modeling is your passion, then you're not heated enough for it. You didn't show interesting poses, phizogs, spreading energy and all the other things, which will make you special among huge crowd of MetArt models. You're just regular part of it.
There's no need for judging your appearance, because definition of beauty is something extremely subjective and only matter of taste of every single individual. I just want to let you know, that despite you're objectively gorgeous, your looks is definitely not my cup of tea.
Monday, March 14th, 2016 on Berenice
Nancy is an incarnation of perfection. MetArt cooperate with only few as gorgeous and talented women, as she's. It's very good, that she as a blond haired and blue eyed model stays in top 10 and especially in ultimate top position for such a long time, because blondes aren't here so popular as they should be.
In addition, from all of her shots are sparkling some important things:
1st - She has professional posing and behaving style in front of camera, despite she's very young and only 2 years in business.
2nd - She isn't too shy to present her beauty and she also really cares, what and how she's doing in front of lens.
3rd - Because she truly enjoys shooting and filming, she's a guarantee of no faked or forced smiling, or posing.
Sunday, January 31st, 2016 on Nancy A
I absolutely don't know, why MetArt cooperates just with few girls, like is Lucy. She's an excellent example, that perfect model can be not only thin figured, small, let us say middle breasted woman, but also curvy shaped and naturally big breasted one.
If there's lack of such type of models, than it's no surprise, that there's practically zero chance for some them to get to top 10. I'm really happy, that Lucy succeeded in it and I can hope for the best, that she can stay there for long time with many more sets, or videos.
Monday, January 25th, 2016 on Lucy Li
Zelda's tan skin is absolutely perfect. It's very interesting, how one little change of model's appearance, can shift her from level "gorgeous" to level "as hot, as hell". It's proved really well in last two sets Meidema and Issare. Abnormal white, maybe Photoshop whited skin, lowed attractivity of last several shoots quiet a lot, what was a pity, because it wasn't her fault. We definitely need much more tanned skin shoots.
Saturday, December 12th, 2015 on Zelda B
And I almost forget something, Monahan. You gave the example with bad advertisement and good product. I say yes, I have such problem, but vice versa. Apple's computer company products are good, but according to my mind, not so good to achieve such high selling numbers. Big quantity of their products are selling just because of their world's best marketing strategy ever. So, I admire their marketing strategy, but I don't like their products not, because they're bad at all, but because they're overpriced considering their quality. And this is the reason, why I will never buy an Apple product, and why I simply can't rate Blake higher, than 1.
Wednesday, November 25th, 2015 on Blake Bartelli
Lightfoot's high-res pictures aren't crap only in this case, but every single time. He also has no clue, what's this site about - soft, but also explicit erotica. He proved it with all his sets and videos. He's best only at one thing. He always ruins whole model's potential. He did it with Alex exactly the same way, as he made it with Blake Bartelli. Check her out and I guarantee, that you will be disappointed too. Not because of her, but because of his weird taste in photographing and terrible camera settings.
I'm semiprofessional photographer. It's my hobby and side source of income too. I can shoot it much more better, as he does, but I'm not interested in such job. The joke is in it, that I as a man, who know some stuff about photographing, I can see a lot of basic mistakes, which he makes every single time, when he grabs the camera and decides to do some photos, or videos for Met-Art.
So, not because of you, gorgeous young girl called Alex, but just because of the photographer Lightfoot, is my rating 1, the lowest possible. I've got for you the same message, as for Blake. Find someone, who I can consider as a real artist, not only as a common photographer, and than I definitely will change my mind.
Wednesday, November 25th, 2015 on Alex Grey
Yes, I know, that's weird for majority of the audience here, but this is really my opinion. Blake can be 12 or let us say 15 out of 10. But when she continues cooperating with someone like is Lightfoot, who completely ruins her potential, then her appearance or posing style doesn't matter for me at all.
Fact, that she as a model deserves 10 points doesn't matter after all, when she cooperates with someone, who have absolutely no idea, what's this site about. In addition, quality of his pictures is one huge catastrophe in general, not only in this case. It was simply bad luck by choosing an amateur.
Blake, if you want higher score from me, you need to find a real professional, who I can consider not only as a photographer, but as an artist too. Till then is my rating 1, what's the lowest possible. Not because of you, but because of Lightfoot, who totally sucks. What a pity for such gorgeous girl, like you.
Friday, November 13th, 2015 on Blake Bartelli
Despite is Sybil very young, she definitely belongs to little group of MetArt models, which aren't only nice girls, but real women with strong personality. She perfectly knows, how to behave in front of camera's lens. Combination of professional poses, temtping phizogs, captivating sights, natural beauty and will to share all these things with us is making top 10 model from her.
Friday, June 26th, 2015 on Sybil A
Split these models again! It's crystal clear, that they're 2 different persons. Eva J isn't Sienne and Sienne isn't Eva J! K, You have big chaos in content. Such a shame.
Friday, June 26th, 2015 on Sienne
Sapphira's bright shining example of female with young, perfect body and mature, strong personality. There on MetArt are whole bunch of nice women, but only few of them can fully use their potential, because of lack of experiences. Eva, what's her real name, does it on 100 %. She really knows, how to behave in front of camera. 2 decades in business poses, superior professional phizogs and non plus ultra temtping smile after just after 2 years of praxis speaks for itself. You are simply killing it, girl! Let's just keep it that way.
Sunday, May 10th, 2015 on Sapphira A
Genie is definitely one of the best newcomers for past few years. She has everything, what's needed in MetArt's style. Well-build figure, especially in belly parts, perfect skin tone, very intensive, appealing expressions on all face showing photos and perfect posing style. Despite she's only 18, barely old to be a nude model, she perfectly knows, how to behave in front of camera. Keep doing your best. Bravo, Genie!
Sunday, May 10th, 2015 on Genie
face n butt, I never said something like that, Lilit isn't pretty, talented, or cooperative enough, to be MetArt model at all. I haven't any problem with her top 10, let us say ultimate top position. What I'm mad about is her huge lead in 1st place. That's unfair to the other top 10 models with long and solid history here.
Look at e.g. Starlet, perfect example of adapting of a newcomer. She made only 3 sets here, where she proved her qualities and she deserved place in top 10 quite well, but with one big important difference. There isn't such rating madness about her, because of any rational reasons to rate her higher, due small count of shoots.
No matter, that fresh face is non plus ultra. If any young girl wants to be MetArt model, she needs to prove, that she belongs to top 10. Ddirectly ultimate top model placement of rookie with huge lead over another girls with long history is showing, that there's something wrong with majority of audience.
Saturday, May 9th, 2015 on Lilit A
I really can't get, why is Lilit so popular. Yes, of course, that she is very pretty, but such madness about her again? C'mon! There on MetArt are whole bunch of ladies with much more perfect and exotic appearance, than she has. Look and think deeper and at least twice or even more, before you will vote for somebody, because her high rating is big mistake.
She doesn't only ignores the photographer. She's actually doing, what she wants. Her phizog on most face showing photos is telling us: "I'm naked here, masturbate and have some orgasms, if you want and need, but don't bother me with any requests." Spreaded legs doesn't save the situation either. Such a shameful approach for girl, which became MetArt model.
Friday, May 1st, 2015 on Lilit A
I seriously don't know, who had such crazy idea, like is changing Lija's hair colour to black, but it's definitely the worst thing, that can ever happen. Please, no more Lija's black-haired sets, which are absolutely ruining all her beauty and talent for posing.
Shoot Potren is best example of that, how shouldn't it be done. Arkisi, if You are the one, who decided to try some weird experiment with Lija, leave it for Your own website, like we can see it in set Nokto. Don't disturb us there on MetArt, where we want to see true nude art.
Thursday, April 16th, 2015 on Lija
Yes, of course, that Lilit's very nice, but make ultimate MetArt top model from her just because of debut shoot? It's definitely cup of too strong coffee for me. Let's wait at least for half a year of regular sets adding with different artists, surroundings, clothing and then can we judge her first, if we want to be fair to the oder models, which are on site for long time.
Friday, March 27th, 2015 on Lilit A
Name of set published in 28th February 2015 is Fyrana, according the cover. Make it correct, please.
Saturday, February 28th, 2015 on Zola
Despite Jeff's physically young, she's already mentally mature, able to express all her emotions and master of posing, of course. For woman with this type of personality is beauty only an icing on the cake and her intention to share all these things with us is bonus non plus ultra. We should be thankful for it and not try to search mistakes there, where they aren't.
Jeff provides in exclusive cooperation with Rylsky great masterpieces of photoshoots, no matter if there, or on his personal site. And what's gratefulness of some of you for it? Criticism of total irrelevant things. I haven't other term for dealing with such nonsense, like is weirdness of her nick name (btw very good choice, Ksenia), or photosets retouching.
I seriously don't know, why some of You have problem with Rylsky's work? He's one of the best and most successful MetArt's artists, what allowed him to open his own site. You, critics, have either gaudiness, or you need to visit ocularist asap. People, you really sometimes need to cogitate twice and deeper, before you write something. Jeff and Rylsky, ignore haters and keep doing your best!
Sunday, February 22nd, 2015 on Jeff Milton
Yes, of course, that Elizabeth is very nice, but she's definitely not perfect. Despite her breasts are natural, they seems to be on most photos like a very decently and genuine looking silicon implants. As shape of boobs is still hardly acceptable, as small size of nipples and areolas totally ruined her naked appearence.
I don't get, why she was completely wiped out first, and then given back to us after some time. But I'm pretty sure, that set Machela was removed because of copyright. It happens very often on similar type of sites like is MetArt.
Tuesday, February 17th, 2015 on Elizabeth A
As much I like Nici's combination of natural beauty and ability to express true emotions, as much I don't understand, who had such crazy idea to colour her hair into blonde in set Variad. I saw on MetArt all sort of weirdness in posing, make-up, clothing, surroundings, etc. But I'm pretty sure, that nothing can ruin model worse, than bad hair colour. Big shame to anybody, who decided to do it this way.
Wednesday, February 11th, 2015 on Nici Dee
Lija absolutely deserves to be at least TOP 10, in an ideal case ultimate TOP model. She has so amazing body, that there's no discussion about perfection of her appearance. She's definitely most beautiful MetArt blonde model. Her natural talent for posing and giving positive emotions via face showen photos are bonuses non plus ultra. All of these things are best assumes for her long and successful nude model career.
Friday, January 16th, 2015 on Lija
Oddmir, after reading Your comment it seems like I've got no clue about difference between true hardcore and something, what only wants to pretend it. It's ridiculous. Trust me, that I know very well, what You want to say. But You have to accept the fact, that everyone's tastes are different. I still stand my ground, that on the one hand she's perfect, but on the other hand she needs more (at least dozen) photoshoots to prove her ability to fit to MetArt's style.
On MetArt is another world famous pornstar, which made real hardcore. Little Caprice named there as Caprice A. She fits her photoshoots to very specific softcore MetArt's style perfectly, but she proves it in plenty of photoshoots and that's exactly it, what I'm talking about.
I seriously don't know, why most of You're so enthusiastic about her appearance considering her age. Much younger look for actual age is for some races typical. It's very common for most of Asians and Native Americans. So I really don't understand, why You're so happy, like Ariel is quasi firt woman in the world with this atribute.
Thursday, January 8th, 2015 on Ariel Rebel
Yes, of course, that Ariel is gorgeous, but I really don't understand this huge euphory about her. She isn't already a rookie, but world famous hardcore porn actress and photo model with long and rich career. I don't like this type of art and IMHO it's impossible to judge her ability to fit to MetArt's softcore just because of one single photoshoot. It's needed to wait at least one year of regular releasing one shoot per month. Than it will be fair to other models to compare quality of her shoots.
Wednesday, January 7th, 2015 on Ariel Rebel
No, Brooks. I don't think, that rating should be only for active models. My opinion is, that MetArt need 2 ways of rating. First one for active models with regular monthly new sets or videos and second one for unactive models. And who are unactive models? Let us say those, which have no new set or video longer than half year. All this in order to restrict the appearance of unactive models in TOP 10, or TOP 20. This is it, what I'm talking about.
Wednesday, October 1st, 2014 on Jennifer Mackay
Sorry for writting it there, but I think, that it's totally unfair to active models, when I see Jennifer and other long time unactive models e. g. Flavia A, Grace C or Toxic A in TOP 10, or Janice A in TOP 20. Model's rating method implemented 1.5 year ago was designed in order to be more fair, but I'm pretty sure, that developers didn't count wirh this side effect. Try to think about it.
Tuesday, September 30th, 2014 on Jennifer Mackay
Nici is definitely one of Met-Art's most underrated models and good example of reasons, why I joined the site for lifetime. This gorgeous Asian petite hasn't only amazing body, but she also perfectly knows, how to be tempting non plus ultra and express her heating emotions. Yes, I know, that big part of achievements shown to us is depending of artist's work too. Despite of it I need to say, that I haven't seen so talented girl for making a nude photosets for very long time. I'm satisfied, that she's there, beside many other sites, where she works. This is exactly the type of girl, which MetArt really needs.
But there's one thing, making me always annoying. It will sound crazy for all of you, but for me appearance doesn't matter at first. Let me explain, why. Most of the MetArt's girls are simply beautiful things. They aren't a real women with ability to express their emotions, enjoy the photographing and they have no idea about the right poses. They're either too shy to share their feelings, or they're simply messing up their job. For first ones: If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen. For second ones: What a shame, considering your earnings, which you get just because you're pretty enough to show your naked bodies in front of camera.
Monday, July 14th, 2014 on Nici Dee
I'm really happy, that in last 2 -3 years joined MetArt models wanted by me. I don't like too slim ones, which are presenting as a false ideal of beauty nowadays. Marta is one of my curvy angels. She's gorgeous and she definitely deserves place in TOP10.
I absolutely agree with the commentators, which realised big photographer's problems. Her perfection seems to be worthless, because Matiss ruins her huge potential with his lack of creativity. In addition, he makes her appearance on many photos unreal, let's say, like from a perfect graphics next generation PC game. It's so shameful for an artist cooperating with such famous and superior site, like is this.
Wednesday, June 4th, 2014 on Marta E
I'm and I also always was sure about huge Michaela's talent. She's 1st class, absolutley deserved TOP10 model.
But there are two another things, which does matter for me:
1. Many ladies there have gorgeous bodies and angelic faces, but olny few of them are real models with professional posing style and ability to express their emotions. Michaela does both of these things perfectly, and this is the main reason, why I like her so much.
2. I'm really happy, that she cooperates with outstanding photographers, which provide her chance to fully enjoy photoshooting, because artist's creativity is also very important part of achievements showen to us.
Friday, May 16th, 2014 on Michaela Isizzu
I browsed throught all Jennifer's pictures with showed face again after some time of her last photoshoot. I made it whole month from time to time and based on this experience I'm definitely sure, that she doesn't deserve to be in TOP10. All her huge nude model potential she kills herself with lack of ability to show emotions, but especially joy of photographing.
Saturday, April 5th, 2014 on Jennifer Mackay
Sapphira's definitely one of the most perfect Met-Art girls and when I write Met-Art, I mean it seriously, because she's Met-Art exclusive model. She doesn't make shoots with any other sites except one, which is already joining Met-Art network.
It doesn't matter, if you prefer petites or highs, blondes or redheads, small or big breasts. You simply can't miss this woman. Although she's only teen aged physically, she's mature mentally, because of her ability to give all her feelings and emotions. The fact, that she really enjoys photoshooting is her bonus for all of us.
Wednesday, January 1st, 2014 on Sapphira A
I write this comment at the moment, when this gorgeous woman is totally deserved TOP model. There are many gorgeous girls on this site, but most of them are chicks. Only few of them are real women, which are able to open their souls and give to viewers throught photos all their feelings and emotions. Mila does it perfectly in every photoshoot. I don't care, how she will be rated in the future, because she will still in my TOP 10 forever.
Wednesday, January 1st, 2014 on Mila M
I don't know, how to express huge impression, which made Jeff on me. She's very emotional, what she proves in every single photo. She has desired combination of true beauty and strong personality. There on Met-Art are only few women with such atributes. It's very sad, that especially in last 2 - 3 years hasn't joined this site any other model with comparable charisma, as is gifted this gorgeous angel with.
Thank You, for Your great work Rylsky. To be honest, when You opened Your own website, I was afraid, that You will keep Your best on it. But now, when I compare Your sets before and after opening, I'm really pleasured, because You make differences only in style, but not in quality of Your shoots.
Sunday, September 22nd, 2013 on Jeff Milton
This is e-mail address, which I need. Thank You very much, Rylsky.
Saturday, September 21st, 2013 on Zelda B
I have many positive, but also negative cogitations to share with, not only about the models, but also about the site (I'm an IT specialist - programmer). When I made it (I wrote off-topic posts into some model comments section) in the past, I realized, that it wasn't good idea. Please, can You explain me, how and where, can I send my notions? I know the offical site, and major site admin e-mail addresses. I'm very active lifetime member, which want to improve the site, and it will be very usefull for me.
To be honest, I'm neither surprised, that my predictions about Kalena comes true. Her TOP model position is absolutely deserved. I knew, that she's very talented since I saw her first set. I'm quiet sure, that first shoots were made to hide her big gift, from whom she shows only small pieces. It's glad, that she proves with every single shoot, that she definitely should be long term, high rated, in an ideal case TOP model.
Friday, August 23rd, 2013 on Michaela Isizzu
I don't want comment set named Vicceda, because great impression from photos totally ruined 1 MPix resolution, which is for me the same, as some kind of very bad joke. With nowaday technics is for me 12 MPix minimal resolution. Yes, of course, I know, that Rylsky has his own webpage, and he's trying to do his best there, but Met-Art, please, don't release such small resolution shooths in the future again.
Tuesday, August 13th, 2013 on Kira J
Almost all of that, what you wrote is true, but even thought I can't agree with you on 100 %. Yes, Zelda's teeth aren't perfect, but if you really want to see some croocked ones, look at the photos, where is smiling Emily Bloom.
Thursday, July 25th, 2013 on Zelda B
You're absolutely right. I've got 100 MB/s optical internet connection with 10 MB/s download speed, but most sets older than 2 - 3 years (depending on model) can't be downloaded faster than 32 - 56 kb/s. That's really annoying.
Saturday, July 20th, 2013 on Anna AJ
Zelda is definitely not only one of the most gorgeous, but also one of the most talented models, which joined Met-Art in last years. Because of this I'm very happy, that she's high rated for the long term.The fact, that she doesn't have a biography can have few reasons:
1st: She decided to stay arcane.
2nd: She wants to protect her privacy.
3nd: Met-Art staff don't care about completing of her questionary.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Zelda B
Kalena has huge potential, which was totally hidden in first two shoots. I'm happy, that she shows only little of her gift in set named Onoma, because I'm seriously curious, to which ultra high level of nude modeling, will she develope in the future. This madam is master of that, what she is doing. I really enjoy her.
Thursday, June 13th, 2013 on Michaela Isizzu
1st: Solrage, as I'm reading Your reaction, I'm serioulsy sure, that You're very realistic cogitative man. You're really candid and I appreciate that.
2nd: I know, that there are two basic modeling schools. Statuesque and expressive, if they can be named this way. With all my comments I only want to say, that I'm a fan of second one.
3rd: In region, where I'm from are most girls beutiful enough to do any kind of modeling, including photoshooting for Met-Art, but most of them haven't got real feelings and emotions. That's the reason, why I'm so demanding in this aspect.
Yes, You're definitely right, that there are some girls, which are either actually curious and they want to try something new, or they've got sufficient dose of exhibitionism, both as a possible reasons for enter to the world of modeling. But look at the countries, where are the models from. How many of them are from USA, Canada, Australia, Japan or high developed west European countries? Almost none. Why are western girls less active in modeling? It isn't because they aren't pretty enough. It's because in countries, where they're from, they've got much more opportunities to earn enough money for life standard of stratum intermedium. And now imagine the situation in east and middle Europe, where are in comparison with western world 50 - 66 % prices, but earnings are only 20 - 25 % of western salaries. This is the reason, why is the money for most girls from east and middle Europe the main motivation for modeling. Btw., I'm from west Europe, but because of business I live in small country in the middle of Europe for couple of years and I write this based on my first-hand experience.
Wednesday, June 12th, 2013 on Jennifer Mackay
1st: I don't know any other model, which continually cooperates with Met-Art for 8 years.
2nd: Although she made tenths of galleries and many movies, she still has new poses to show.
3rd: Her posing style is excellent, but her joy of photoshooting is bonus non plus ultra.
4th: Thanks to wide variety of photosets can be satisfied people with all kinds of tastes.
5th: Her true seduction is hidden in her curvy & busty body, by working with which, she's a real master.
Friday, June 7th, 2013 on Jenya D
1st: My comments doesn't contains any vulgar words, rough expressions, or affronts to whomever, including models, which are dealing the comments with.
2nd: I'm proud, that I've got ability to discover someone's traits of character from the pohotos, but true is, it takes very long time to learn something like that.
3rd: All of us know, that girls, which are models there, voluntarily choosed the way of lowest resistance of earning money, so I expect from them at least some basic exposes of professionality and joy from photoshooting.
4th: I've right to write, what I think about all models girls, and when I see some models, which I disagree to be in TOP10, or some girl, which is TOP model at the moment, I can write my own outlook and nobody can't prohibit me to do it.
Friday, May 31st, 2013 on Jennifer Mackay
Anybody can disagree with my opinion, but nobody can't probibit me to write, what I think. Or is some kind of censorship there? I paid a lot of money for lifetime membership, and I simply can't say my own point of view? I mentioned this, because although my comment doesn't contains vulgar words, rough expressions or affronts, it was hidden for certain time. This is really curious.
Friday, May 24th, 2013 on Mila I
I have several reasons to dislike this girl:
At 1st - I can look at her non-stop, but I see nothing, except perfect body and angelic face. She hasn't charisma, emotions, power of personality and ability to impress. She's so cold and empty.
At 2nd - Although she's gorgeous, she misses something indefinable, which will make her unique and outstanding from large bunch of other beautiful women. She's extremely mediocrity female.
At 3rd - When she looks to the camera, it seems, that she doesn't enjoys photoshooting at all, but she makes it only because of some strange reason, which she herself can't explain.
Friday, May 24th, 2013 on Jennifer Mackay
I seriously don't know, if it's because of wrong choices of places and poses in the sets, or if it's problem with her, but I find this girl only as a sexy. In my comprehension it means, that she's fisrt planned, cheap beauty chick. Yes, of course, she has perfect body, but it isn't enough for me. If I really want to enjoy the photos, I expect something more, something magical, almost mystical. But when I look at her, there's only emptiness. She hasn't charisma, power of personality ect., ergo all the things, which are important for me.
Monday, May 20th, 2013 on Grace C
I've got severel reasons to disagree with You. At 1st: Tattoo fits to her totally perfect and it makes her even hotter, than she was without it. At 2dn: It's clear, that You haven't got any idea about meaning of tattoed symbol and reason of its placement. At 3rd: Don't think, that girls, which poses for sets there are dummies. When she chooses this tattoo in this place, than she's very spiritually based, wise and strong person.
Monday, May 13th, 2013 on Mila I
Lili's definitely a master definition of perfection. She has very special, magical sight and her whole body isn't only gorgeous. Her poses in front of camera are so mystical, that they can bring man into a dreaming reality in just few seconds. But Lili is an angel, so these dreams simply can't be ditry, dealing with sex. They're about beautiful teasing and consequently about petting. I allways enjoy her new set, when they comes out. Thank You for posing in all sets, Lili. Thank You for excellent work, MetArt.
Saturday, May 11th, 2013 on Lily C
I'm quiet sure, that guy, who gave me "thumb down" didn't understand my opinion at all. True gorgeousness combinated with natural talent represents Emily. Some other high rated models, which are in TOP10, maybe in TOP20 are examples of cheap "weird pattern" beauty and l'art pour l'art posing style, that's a solid fact.
Saturday, May 11th, 2013 on Emily Bloom
She's definitely one of the most beautiful and gifted girls, which started career on MetArt for last few years. It's very good, to see her in TOP10, but competition there's very hard. When I observe mixing of top rated models list, I'm really affraid, if people are able to sort true gorgeousness combinated with natural talent from cheap "weird pattern" beauty and l'art pour l'art posing style. Emily, I wish You, to stay on this position (or even higher) as long, as it is possible, and I've only one appeal on MetArt: Do more sets with her, please.
Friday, May 10th, 2013 on Emily Bloom
Anna's finally a TOP model again! I was very misconceived, why she was for so long time out of TOP10, crossly her huge fame all over the internet. She's a master of posing style too, especially in cooperation with photographer Leonardo. Congratulation, Anna, because You allways show before camera true nude art, which exactly defines the focus of MetArt.
Thursday, May 9th, 2013 on Anna AJ
Anna's well-known model, which does in cooperation with MetArt 1st class masterpieces photoshoots. I know, that's very hard, but when You donwload her sets, don't only look at her. Try to think about her style of posing too, because that's it, what should be definitely named master style. Thank You for posing in all sets Anna, and praise for great work, MetArt.
Thursday, May 2nd, 2013 on Anna AJ
Only one thing, what I can say about Barbara is, that she simply gorgeous. Because of her curvy body combinated with dollface, I was allways wondering, why she was so uderratet for so long time. Now she's finally a deserved top model. Just one appeal to MetArt: Do more sets with her, please!
Thursday, May 2nd, 2013 on Barbara D
I agree with You on 100 %. She definitely should be in TOP10, but there's still something really bad. Helen is one of many MET tattooed girls and in most shoots are this damn good kinky attributes hidden. My question is: Why? Yes, I know, that tattoos are looking good only on some girls, if they've correct combination of eyes/hair colour, face and body type. But all tattoed girls, I've seen there, are even hotter with the tattoos, so why we can't see them?
Sunday, April 28th, 2013 on Helen H
As much is Malena gorgeous, as much I'm disappointed of her photos there. It has nothing to do with her style of posing, because from it's clear, she's a professional. I've another problem. I seriously don't know, why are hidden tattoos, her adorable kinky atributes on the most of the shoots? It doesn't make any sense. Do more natural sets, without wiping out of it, what makes this girl as hot as hell.
Sunday, April 28th, 2013 on Malena Morgan
Yes, You're right. Comments are there for all, in order to express opinions, but everyone's into something other, so it's very simple. If You don't like Caprice, don't visit her site. Someone likes 160 cm slim petite, whereas the other one preffers 180 cm tall peachy and creamy girl. I allways say, that with women it's the same, as with cars. Someone enjoys 90's Nippon XTreme, e. g. 2.6 litre L6 engined Nissan SkyLine GT-R/R34, whereas the other one loves 60's classic US Muscle, e. g. 7 litre V8 engined Dodge Charger B-Body. Both of them can have 1000 HP (and even more), but if You want to curb the horses, You need to have totally different driving style. So stop agruing about style of art of model(s), which You don't like and enjoy the girl(s) photosets and videos, which You like.
Thursday, April 25th, 2013 on Caprice A
At first: It doesn't matter, what kind of photosets and movies she's making on other sites. At second: MetArt definitely isn't turning to porn site. It's still to be a perfect nude art site. At third: If Caprice wants to cooperate with MetArt, she must to fit into their style. And as I can see it in her photoshoots and videos, she does it very well. So, where is the problem? Best solution for You is very simple. If You don't like her, don't visit her personal site and stop posting hate comments, please.
Monday, April 15th, 2013 on Caprice A
I agree with You on 100 %. There are soo many haters, who don't know anything about true nude art. Is she doing a hardcore porn? Yes. But who cares? Fits she to the MetArt style and did she it well? Yes! So no more discussions about her style of art and enjoy her photosets and videos there on MetArt!
I totally agree, every time I see a set photographed by Charles it automatically gets a 1 rating. Its not the model Im rating...Its Charles Lightfoot. My cell phone takes better quality photos.
Friday, April 28th, 2017 on Lena Anderson
"By reading and listening to someone's life story, even only a tiny snippet, it can only further enrich one's own"! fireball-xl5 22/01/2017.Incidentally, I wonder just how many MetArt members after reading your comment went straight to Beautiful Berenice's bio, opened it up, enjoyed reading it and then fell in love.
Saturday, January 21st, 2017 on Berenice
So...here's the thing about photographers: MET has more than one providing sets. Each photographer brings something different to the table. If you dislike a particular photographer's style...don't look at the set. Move on.
If curiosity gets the best of you and you take a peek at the set anyway, you may find there's something a photographer may include or omit in a future set; respectfully address it here. If you only plan to insult, keep it to yourself and enjoy the other sets of the day.
And just in general, everyone, let's be civil and respectful here. Be considerate of each other, the photographers, and especially the models. =D
Obviously you are a coniseurr of the vagina of the utmost degree. But to disparage the work of Mr Lightfoot so viciously is uncalled for. Give the man a break. Just because YOU don't like it doesn't mean it's crap.
No matter how down you might feel it can only give you great confidence to know there is someone so much more wretched than yourself when you read such a ridiculous comment as this.
Thursday, March 17th, 2016 on Berenice
What a ridiculously unpleasant and irrelevant comment. Are you seriously complaining that her bio is too long? I don't suppose that you find it ironic that your complaint is almost as long as her bio, do you? I know which wordy note I'd rather read.
I award you no points, and my god have mercy on your soul.
Wednesday, March 16th, 2016 on Berenice
Probably the winner for nasty comment of the week. And so uselessly long. Great looking girl and I like a bit of a bio.
Can't agree with your approach. Blake should be rated on Blake, not Lightfoot. Lightfoot should be rated on the photo content. It's like saying you rate a BMW very low because the ads stink even though you love the car.
Sunday, November 22nd, 2015 on Blake Bartelli
It's amazing what going back to a natural hair color and style will do to her appearance. This is in fact one model, I have confirmed in my database. If you cross check certain features such as torso, nipples, eyes and lips you will see that these are all exact. They are emphasized different because of makeup changes and hair color (also looks like she used to bleach her eyebrows). I hope this helps :)
Just out of curiosity ... how would changing a woman's HAIR COLOR effect her "... [TALENT] for posing." (my emphasis)? It certainly would affect the way you look at her or perceive her sets, but hair color certainly shouldn't affect her talent for posing - unless maybe the coloring process somehow seeps through her skin and directly affects her brain - but I doubt that that would happen.
Thursday, June 25th, 2015 on Lija
It's most likely herself who decided to change her hair color. I also prefer natural or naturally looking hair colors but most of the times you have to accept what girls choose to do with their hair or body in general, unless they realize it's not good for their careers (provided modeling is their main job and not just an occasional one).
Tuesday, June 2nd, 2015 on Nici Dee
as for seniority, thats neither here nor there because she probably is barely old enough to model nude in the first place, she can't help that, as for seniors, take jenya d for example possibly the longest running model here, lilit a showed way more ass than jenya d has that I've seen in her whole career. jenya has like 100 sets and I've seen more ass in lilts debut shoot. so now, on that note, I'm going to go masturbate again and have some more orgasms to lilits pretty little ass LOL
Saturday, May 2nd, 2015 on Lilit A
she has fulfilled all my requests by being naked and I've masturbated and had many orgasms to her already and for that, she has done her job better than many if not most models. so i salute her. she deserves whatever high ratings she receives
wheres the thumbs down button for this? what models are we talking about? everyone has their own opinion and I'm pretty sure id not feel the same way about your so called better models you speak of.
She's a beautiful girl with an amazing body. I think she displayed it quite well. There's eye contact in there, too..so, she's not ignoring us. Great poses, great personality, great body, beautiful smile. Why not rate a ten?
Her attributes that i just mentioned make the ten..not seniority.
Every girl on MET is a ten. We just have our own perception of what a ten is to us personally. No girl should be rated low on this site. And girls who are rated high meet the standards of those who rate them as such.
Thank you for support. And we always remember that 90% of critics create nothing. If World was follow critics and votes - then you had no chance to drive, fly or heal you, no Internet and no erotica of corse was possible if critics was the main who judge.
take it easy guys, I am smiling while writing this.
Wednesday, March 4th, 2015 on Jeff Milton
I've seen her work for many years and she is defiantly most famous for her softcore work. As far as I know, there are very few videos of her with a man, and that man is her boyfriend. She's done many girl-girl scenes though. For the most of her career, she worked with softcore porn on her site. All the harder stuff is all pretty new and still quite "innocent" compared to the stuff any "normal" world famous hardcore porn actress have done.
Agree - Her top model position is well deserved. But unfortunately she will eventually stop posting new photo sets and Metart will be done with her. Just like other past darlings that were the main draw to this website. Case in point - Anna AJ currently #192 after 4 years of MIA and Jenya average 8.61 and the #1 in 2008-2009. No one stays on top because this is a business and they need to make room for new models at the top to keep us interested. The rankings are all fake and manipulated. How are we supposed to believe that human nature that ranks a model 9 or 10 in first few months she shows up changes so drastically in later years that you see a model is receiving votes of 5 and below. Because when a model has a 9+ average after 2000 votes, the average is not moving anytime soon. And that's BORING when your number one model hasn't had a new set in years. If a model doesn't well "model", metart is either inserting fake votes to bring down the average or just blatantly changing the average. If Jenya D had a 9 average several years ago with e.g. 4000 votes, then she would need to receive 7000 more votes at 7 to get her down to where she is currently. Human nature doesn't look at those tits and say 7 because the photo is several years old. Look at the graveyard of past Top 10 models down in the 800-1500 range and you will see the future of all these current Top 10s. Jeff Milton is cute but not #1. Michaela Isizzu is hot and most likely worthy of #1. Metart history is cruel to those who age.
Tuesday, November 4th, 2014 on Michaela Isizzu
Thanks for responding. I apologize if I came off as being rude or disrespectful LINUXmaniac.
I guess I kind of wonder why it really matters? A new model with a relatively few number of votes can make it into the top 20 easier than a model who has many votes can move up into the top 20.
Once a model has been in a certain area of the top 50 or so they usually will remain somewhere near this because if the sheer number of votes they have accumulated.
If a model has 3000 votes it will take many votes to significantly raise their overall rating, but a model with 500 votes will either rise or fall rather quickly if the gather several high or low votes.
Another thing I noticed is that the difference between say 1 and 15 is only 1 or 2 hundreds of a percentage point (9.17 vs. 9.15) so their popularity is very, very, close anyway.
Sorry, I'm rambling on.
I understand what you are saying, but I think any "fix" will only cause more confusion (and member complaints/revolt).
I'm not sure what they can do about it. Wouldn't it also be unfair if inactive models were excluded from voting? I like many inactive models as much as (or more so than) active ones.
I guess more than anything I'm not sure what you are alluding to?
Do you think voting should only be for active models?
What happens when they retire? Or even more questionable, what about those who have retired, but "K" pulls another set out of MA's database and publishes it a month/a year/or several years after the model became inactive/retired? (Altea/Antea just recently).
It's been a Met-Art kind of "policy" in the past not to show tattos if at all possible, although in some newer sets, it seems as if the "policy" has become more of a guideline than a hard-fast rule.
Sunday, November 10th, 2013 on Helen H
That's a very nice and thoughtful comment.
Tuesday, September 24th, 2013 on Jeff Milton
to linux Maniac, I agree with you on 100 % as well !
Thursday, September 19th, 2013 on Caprice A
The only once I remember I've heard when some people look to the teeth for judge "good or bad". It was about to choose a horse and it was 100s years ago.
Sad I see this kind of discussions here and not about horses.
...even if it was only joke - remember models read this shit.
Friday, September 6th, 2013 on Zelda B
1 mpix is not Rylsky's joke, it is just technical issue of a site, will be fixed today or tomorrow. Sometimes it happens, but not because of Rylsky.
Thank you for informing.
correct is 2nd.
Sunday, July 28th, 2013 on Zelda B
Dude you're fucking gay
Tuesday, July 16th, 2013 on Grace C
I agree and disagree. Huge tats on hot women do not make them look hotter. But what looks worse is when an amateur Photoshop artist tries to remove them (the way they tried in her sets). It's good that whoever was trying to Photoshop her tats finally stopped trying.
Sunday, June 23rd, 2013 on Malena Morgan
Linux, I think you have some valid points, however, I think there are some valid counter-points to be made as well.
1st - I can sympathize with your preference fir girls that are more charismatic and emotionally engaging, but there is a whole school of modeling built around the aloof, cool, distanced, detached, statuesque style, and Jennifer definitely falls into that style. While I'm generally with you in preferring girls that are more charismatic, I think there are a few models that are gorgeous enough to pull of the "statuesque" style, and Jennifer is one of them (I'd list Jenya D as perhaps the archetypal example).
2nd - This is simply a matter of opinion, but I can't do anything more than flatly disagree... I mean, you say she has a "perfect body and angelic face," yet then say she has nothing that's "unique and outstanding?" Do "perfect bodies and angelic faces" grow on trees where you're from? Because I don't see many of them, even on a site with the quality of MA.
3rd - I think this goes back to what I said about the "statuesque" style of erotic photography. It's not that she's not enjoying it, it's merely a style/persona. It would be like saying that an actor doesn't like acting because they have to cry in a role... and posing is a form of acting. While some girls might try to "be themselves," there are just as many that use photography as a way to express other sides of themselves and not their whole or even normal way of being.
However, I must take exception to your statement that: "All of us know, that girls, which are models there, voluntarily choosed the way of lowest resistance of earning money." I've known many models and the notion that either it's the "lowest resistance of earning money" or that's why they do it is nothing but a common misconception. Most models I know got into it because they were curious to try it, perhaps even seeing it as a way to express themselves. Yes, I'm sure the money is nice, but it's not the only or even primary concern for many.
All this said, I still support your right to express your opinions. If nothing else, at least a little negativity is good for generating discussion. Opposition is the core of drama, after all, and I'm fairly confident that Jennifer knows she's appreciated by many others (especially given her top 10 ranking).
Sunday, June 9th, 2013 on Jennifer Mackay
Your pseudo should be simply LINUXlunatic
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Jennifer Mackay
Yes...I see...you write and write and write... Yet you say nothing! You think that calling the girl "cold and empty" is not an 'affront' to her!? Apparently you treat your women differently wherever you're from. Your No.'s 2 and 3 are just plain ignorant...judging a models "character" or "motivation" by looking at "posed" pictures of her is ridiculous. Yes, you do have the 'right' to say what you think, and I have the right to let you know how full of gas you are, and to defend my favorite model when an insulting 'boob' shows up. You should expect to take heat with comments like yours...about ANY girl here!
I have a 'few' reasons to take exception to your comment...
1st-Three is not "several" it's "a few".
2nd-To judge a model as "cold and empty" based on a set of photos is moronic, at best.
3rd-If you can't pick this girl out of a crowd, you have serious vision issues.
Further-Many models on the site produce sets in which they never smile. It's nice to see a model enjoying herself during the shoot, but hardly mandatory.
And Further MORE-If you don't like a particular model, it's the respectful thing to do to simply not view her sets. Writing comments like yours benefits no one, and makes YOU look like an ass!! To me anyway! None of the girls deserve that crap!
Thursday, May 30th, 2013 on Jennifer Mackay
Cold and empty.
You nailed it.
You've made some good observations. I agree.
Point #1: A matter of opinion -- to which, you are entitled.
Point #2: Irrelevant to the discussion of a photo.
Point #3: Irrelevant and immaterial.
I can post what ever comments I like, you do not own my view! I do not tell you how to view the model or what you can say and you sure as hell won't stop me from saying what I think of the model! Everyone on here has a right to their comments on a model your approval is not needed!
Wednesday, April 24th, 2013 on Caprice A
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.