Does it get any better than this set? I don't think so!
Friday, October 13th, 2017 on Jadeni
I adore Patritcy but I think this is her worst set. She looks like she doesn't want to be there. I guess we can't have perfection all of the time.
Friday, October 13th, 2017 on Givae
She’s a gorgeous girl but this is far from her best set.
Tuesday, October 10th, 2017 on Faria
She has her style and we all have our opinions, but her style is incongruous with the rest of the site. It may be art (good or bad, you decide) but it is not MetArt. They would be out of business if it was.
Tuesday, October 10th, 2017 on Fenaco
She’s a wonderfully pretty girl.
Saturday, October 7th, 2017 on Nerus
Keep your day job.
Saturday, October 7th, 2017 on Telen
This set has a lot of pictures but it goes nowhere.
Saturday, October 7th, 2017 on Coraten
Did he forget his zoom lens? Did she not shower? She's one of my favorites and deserves so much better than this. Also, I never would have thought a chair could detract so much from a picture like that purple thing in the first 35 pictures. Please Caramel, find another photographer.
Monday, October 2nd, 2017 on Javint
One of my favorite girls shot by one of my least favorite photographers. What a shame. Maybe next time Natasha will bring a flash and we can see the model.
Sunday, October 1st, 2017 on Obetta
Are you talking about the set just above on this page? I couldn’t disagree more.
Sunday, October 1st, 2017 on Adoca
Another set from Charles Lightfoot who apparently thinks that the worse the image quality, the better. All of his models deserve better.
Sunday, October 1st, 2017 on Tonoe
I’ll have to wait until someone else photographs her with the lights on to see how beautiful she might be. These pictures are for Playboy, not MetArt.
Friday, September 29th, 2017 on Presenting Yuna
She's a beautiful woman but the set was way too short. In general, things were better when sets couldn't be this short.
Thursday, September 28th, 2017 on Sirane
Nikia is the best evidence that there is a God and if you don't want to wait to see heaven, see Nikia.
Friday, September 22nd, 2017 on Kelna
I think she is hot-it's the photographer who is not. However, an 8.95 rating is not bad, but it is also not good.
Friday, September 22nd, 2017 on Jaden
Thursday, September 21st, 2017 on Aiten
Tuesday, September 19th, 2017 on Sinee
She looks magnificent in this set.
Saturday, September 16th, 2017 on Leaca
The set was way too short for this gorgeous girl.
Thursday, September 14th, 2017 on Alnea
She looks like a beautiful girl. It's too bad that she wasn't shot by a photographer who own a flash and has taken a look at some of the other sets on this site. Oh well. At least Miss Schon doesn't get published as much as Mr. Lightfoot. Of course, if the two of them had a child, that child would take perfectly lit pictures.
Thursday, September 14th, 2017 on Presenting Rise
I think this got off to a good start but never got off the ground. It's like the second half of the pictures were accidentally left out.
Wednesday, September 13th, 2017 on Lonepe
I think he broke his zoom lens. Too bad. She deserves much better.
Tuesday, September 12th, 2017 on Eetan
Sunday, September 10th, 2017 on Anqui
Did Charles finally take a course in how to use a flash?
Saturday, September 9th, 2017 on Mayen
I'm sorry but I cannot believe MetArt published this. Probably the worst video I've seen on here.
Wednesday, September 6th, 2017 on Session 02
I usually hate props but this set was an exception—excellent in every respect.
Tuesday, September 5th, 2017 on Fulla
The English language is too inadequate to describe her; she is beyond words. I like her better with her hair down but that's like saying I'd rather win $1.000.001 in the lottery instead of $1.000.000. Nikia is an angel among angels.
Friday, September 1st, 2017 on Dydo
Violla has one of the prettiest faces in the world! The rest of her is wonderful too!
Friday, September 1st, 2017 on Zalagi
Seriously? Where is the rest of the set? It seems to have a beginning and middle but no end. Caramel deserves much better than this.
Friday, September 1st, 2017 on Rertin
It's not a good set—in my opinion. It's not a question of not liking Ms. Ness and you probably should not assume that when someone disagrees with you it's because of the wrong reason. It really is possible that they don't like the set—even those few guys.
Thursday, August 31st, 2017 on Natyce
A beautiful girl in an uninspired set.
Wednesday, August 30th, 2017 on Alucat
I love Marlena and think she is one of the most underrated models on the site. However, this film was disappointing. Creative flair? I didn't see it, sorry.
Tuesday, August 29th, 2017 on Master Chef
Am I the only one who found the set lacking? She has done very much better. Although, it is not her. It's the photographer.
Tuesday, August 29th, 2017 on Esseto
Yet one more example from Mr. Lightfoot who thinks that the worse the image quality, the better.
Monday, August 28th, 2017 on Presenting Carolina Sweets
Cordoba is a 10 but the photographer is a 0. Where is he going to shoot her next—in a landfill? Also, nothing ruins a picture more than a pair of dirty feet. She deserved much better than this. MetArt should never have published these in my opinion.
Friday, August 25th, 2017 on Sedaga
Friday, August 18th, 2017 on Apour
You're not talking about the photo shoot just above, are you? Poor? Really?
The is only a single flaw in this set—the shows. Otherwise, it's stellar.
Tuesday, August 15th, 2017 on Hoteme
31 photos with that ridiculous thing on her head? One would have been one too many. I will say though that the rest of the set makes up for it. It's a 10 despite getting off to an awful start.
Tuesday, August 15th, 2017 on Holti
Wednesday, August 9th, 2017 on Amodi
She just might have the prettiest face in the world.
Tuesday, August 8th, 2017 on Alieca
There is Nikia and then there is everyone else. She defines perfection.
Monday, August 7th, 2017 on Jerna
You're rather full of yourself.
Tuesday, August 1st, 2017 on Clia
If we all chipped in and bought her a flash for Christmas, do you think she would use it?
So the rest of the sets here are vulgar? Seriously?
Thursday, July 27th, 2017 on Presenting Margo Beth
Seriously? It wasn't until the 109th picture that someone on the set had the sense to take that headpiece away from her? Matiss, what were you thinking? This woman is stunning but you felt that the headpiece actually improved the pictures? Hmmm. I wonder who like the first 108 more than the rest.
Wednesday, July 12th, 2017 on Moriha
Stunning beyond words!
Wednesday, July 12th, 2017 on Dezita
I would take most anyone except, perhaps, Charles Lightfoot over Natasha Schon. Her pictures simply do not belong here in my humble opinion.
Monday, July 10th, 2017 on Porena
I find this another dark, boring set by Miss Schon.
Thursday, July 6th, 2017 on Presenting Elin
Once again Charles appears on MetArt demonstrating that comments and photographer ratings have nothing to do with how often a photographer appears here.
Tuesday, July 4th, 2017 on Landel
Another washed out, grainy set by Mr. Lightfoot. How low does a photographer have to be rated on this site in order to make just rare appearances? Judging from Charles, the more people complain, the more you get featured.
Saturday, July 1st, 2017 on Aldixa
Thursday, June 29th, 2017 on Nisela
We need more of her. She is in my top 5—a dream come true.
Thursday, June 29th, 2017 on Aurmi
Seriously...you should stop posting girl-girl sets. They are totally fake in my humble opinion. In fact, you require them to be fake in order to meet your standards. Think about that a minute and you might realize what I mean.
Saturday, June 24th, 2017 on Presenting Marca
Why can't MetArt by pictures from a photographer who knows how to take a clear picture?
Tuesday, June 20th, 2017 on Enosle
She is absolutely adorable!
Monday, June 19th, 2017 on Asnea
Sunday, June 18th, 2017 on Harlu
Did he break his zoom lens halfway through the shoot?
Saturday, June 17th, 2017 on Fellia
By the same token, should no one keep saying anything good about a model or photographer? Each and every set? What is the point?
Wednesday, June 14th, 2017 on Presenting Megan Rain
One of the prettiest faces in the world with a spectacular body to go with it.
Saturday, June 10th, 2017 on Lisora
Nikia and Rylsky, perfect together as always.
Saturday, June 10th, 2017 on Arlanu
A beautiful girl but not one of her better sets.
Friday, June 9th, 2017 on Delina
At some point, the constant complaints should mean something to someone there. Can't MetArt publish pictures that appeal to a larger selection of your members? Why would MetArt want to generate such negative comments every time this guy gets published. Moreover, this guy gets published a lot. Quite frankly, I don't understand why.
Thursday, June 8th, 2017 on Nemil
A job well done!
Monday, June 5th, 2017 on Belza
I find this outstanding composition but too many shots were done in the style of Charles Lightfoot—grainy and poor exposure. I'm glad to know that it is n older set because perhaps there is a chance that Mr. Guzman has since learned how to take a picture as opposed to Mr. Lightfoot.
Friday, June 2nd, 2017 on Welka
Well, if the pictures are identical to a set previously published on date x, you would know that the pictures were taken on or (most likely) before date x. You would know that even without "any sort of shot dates".
No one from Met, including Rose, said the set has to be deleted from this site so relax. However, they should not post the same set on multiple sites. That's just plain common sense and good business sense. Of course anyone who does not have a membership on the other sites where the sets were previously posted wouldn't care (much) but those who do should not pay for the same set twice. If it happens a few times a year, so what but it should not become a pattern.
Did they forget to post the second half of the set? This is probably the most abrupt set I've seen on here.
Thursday, June 1st, 2017 on Leaten
A stunning addition to MetArt.
Wednesday, May 31st, 2017 on Presenting Anie Darling
I find this set quite uninspired.
Wednesday, May 31st, 2017 on Nantees
Yes another set of low quality images that Met can be proud of.
Monday, May 29th, 2017 on Rizeti
According to Charles, the worse the image quality the better. Maybe he will leave the lens cap on for his next shoot.
Saturday, May 27th, 2017 on Jivem
A beautiful woman but this is far from her best set.
Friday, May 26th, 2017 on Conalmi
Well, gaetano's point is that these are boring pictures of a beautiful girl. Does he (she?) really need to explain why he finds them boring? Can any of us know if it is the model or the photographer? Also, does it really matter if Shalon wanted to be photographed this way or it was Koenart's choice? He finds them boring regardless. Personally, I think Koenart is one of the best photographers here but it is hard to tell if a boring set is the photographers fault or the best she could do with the model, based on one set. Either way, I don't find the pictures boring in the least and I rarely find a Koenart set boring. But, I'm not gaetano. One more thing, why do you feel that he shouldn't give negative feedback on the first set? That seems rather silly to me. If he find the set boring, so be it. Why does he have to shut up about it? A set should not be boring-not the first one and not the 100th one.
Friday, May 26th, 2017 on Presenting Shalon
Thursday, May 25th, 2017 on Dinaba
This is the kind of Salt one should have with every meal!
Wednesday, May 24th, 2017 on Rovety
This girl is a 10 but there is something missing from this set.
Wednesday, May 24th, 2017 on Treshy
If Charles Lightfoot married Natasha Schon, their kid would take perfectly exposed pictures. The big shame here is that his composition is usually very good. Why on earth he thinks that making the image quality look like crap makes it look good is beyond me. A clear, properly balanced exposure is not nice to look at? And, MetArt, why does it seem that the frequency with which a photographer appears on your site in inversely proportional to his or her rating? Does Charles own MetArt or do you not even bother to read the comments or look at the ratings? I've never seen a business where the voice of the customer means so little. Yeah, there are people who like him. But how many photographers are as maligned in the comments and ratings as he is yet he appears with great frequency?
Wednesday, May 24th, 2017 on Matyli
If the goal was to make Emily appear like a bloodless ghost, he succeeded. Personally, I cannot believe he would show these to someone. She deserves better.
Monday, May 22nd, 2017 on Tensia
Are you talking about the set above? The one I saw looks to me nothing like what you have described.
Saturday, May 20th, 2017 on Cleige
Not her best. Looks like she doesn't want to be there.
Friday, May 19th, 2017 on Soleba
If she defines the site, why does she have such a low rating?
Thursday, May 18th, 2017 on Cavida
The model is fine but the photographer was having an extremely bad day.
Wednesday, May 17th, 2017 on Welliz
I couldn't disagree more.
Wednesday, May 17th, 2017 on Nettle
Tuesday, May 16th, 2017 on Bedtime Tease
Beautiful girl, disappointing poses, too few pictures.
Saturday, May 13th, 2017 on Fisena
I'll agree that this is not his worst set.
Saturday, May 13th, 2017 on Ferten
Gorgeous pictures of a gorgeous girl.
Sunday, May 7th, 2017 on Sineva
Nah, it's porn but it's beautiful.
Charles Lightfoot, a photographer who deliberately makes photos look bad in order to make them look good except it doesn't work. I'm sorry but can someone please steal his camera?
Sunday, May 7th, 2017 on Tosiea
Sorry but we do get that it is his style of shooting. The problem is that his style sucks for, it would seem, a great many of us.
Saturday, May 6th, 2017 on Conixa
Bad analogy. A car is more than something to look at. It matters what's inside and how it drives. Pictures are only to look at and his image quality is horrible. It's great that it is his style. The only problem is that his style sucks. My opinion.
Saturday, May 6th, 2017 on Pitena
Friday, May 5th, 2017 on Barisa
A horrible set of pictures of an otherwise wonderful girl.
Friday, May 5th, 2017 on Ezale
Maybe we can take up a collection and buy Mr. Lightfoot some photography lessons. Either that or a pair of glasses.
Friday, May 5th, 2017 on Pitena
Please, someone offer Charles early retirement.
Thursday, May 4th, 2017 on Conixa
Yet another awfully shot set by Mr. Lightfoot-in my opinion anyway. How long does one have to study to be able to produce such grainy, washed out pictures? After his last two sets, I thought there was hope. Apparently not.
Wednesday, May 3rd, 2017 on Posure
I agree. This is her best set!
Tuesday, May 2nd, 2017 on Danhie
This is how it's done! PERFECTION!
Thursday, April 27th, 2017 on Riss
She looks so much better with her hair down. A pretty girl in a poor set.
Thursday, April 27th, 2017 on Presenting Siiri
I agree. I don't know if it is her or the photographer, but the set is seriously lacking.
Wednesday, April 26th, 2017 on Presenting Margot Reese
Finally a set of properly exposed pictures and, with excellent composition. Very nice.
Tuesday, April 25th, 2017 on Dentiz
The set was way too short.
Saturday, April 22nd, 2017 on Tallava
I don't know what the thinking was behind this set.
Saturday, April 22nd, 2017 on Presenting Anna Aki
Why do you continue to publish this photographer? Do the ratings and comments mean nothing to MetArt?
Friday, April 21st, 2017 on Estinne
A wonderful addition to MetArt.
Thursday, April 20th, 2017 on Presenting Bridgette Angel
Magnificent in every way possible.
Tuesday, April 18th, 2017 on Drecaz
There is Nikia, then there is nothing, and still nothing, yet more nothing, an abundance of nothing, a bit more nothing, then everyone else.
Sunday, April 16th, 2017 on Endela
There is trying something different and, sorry but it is my opinion, trying something dumb. Do we really have to like something and not criticize it because it is different? Your logic escapes me. What are we supposed to do? Lie and say the prop made the set? Different, variety, whatever...we like what we like and don't like what we don't like. While people might not like harsh criticism, it would be a disservice to lie or remain silent.
Friday, April 14th, 2017 on Gradise
In my opinion, MetArt should stop with the duos. They all look fake—like the girls want nothing to do with each other. It doesn't matter how gorgeous one or both might be. There is nothing natural about the sets. It's just two girls posing for the camera.
Wednesday, April 12th, 2017 on Evona
I couldn't agree more. In fact, I increased my rating of her to a 10 based on this set. She looks way better like this.
Monday, April 10th, 2017 on Merdia
You're wrong. Well, you did ask me to tell you that.
Saturday, April 8th, 2017 on Triafe
I'm not sure if I'd rather look at dirty feet or worn soles, but there is no excuse for either except incompetence. Or, does CL claim that dirty soles is art the same way he apparently thinks overexposed, grainy pictures are art?
Friday, April 7th, 2017 on Recala
He's one of the best here? Best at what? Producing poorly exposed grainy images of worn out heels? I have no idea why they continue to publish this guy. Does anyone at Met ever read these comments or look at the ratings? Why do you ratings and comments? Is it just to give you something to ignore?
Because it is "the chosen style that he sells to Met" does NOT make it good. In my opinion, CL produces crap. He has not the slightest idea how to expose a photograph. Beyond that, the image quality is worse than photographic capabilities over 75 years ago. I don't care if he is doing it intentionally or out of complete incompetence. I, and many others here, find his work awful. Remember, calling it art doesn't make it good. There is plenty of bad art out there and CL has signed his name to a lot of it.
Did they really think the flowers on her head looked good? Jeeze!
Wednesday, April 5th, 2017 on Haneta
In my opinion, Mr. Lightfoot has no idea whatever how to light a subject. Does he wash them out intentionally and produce grainy pictures in the name of [bad] art?
Wednesday, April 5th, 2017 on Presenting Kylie Page
I will never understand why a photographer would even think to publish a picture with dirty feet. It is unfathomable but you see those pictures here all of the time.
Tuesday, April 4th, 2017 on Presenting Jilian
I'm not sure what you are getting at. 99% of the comments are opinions unless someone decided to state how many pictures were in the set.
Monday, April 3rd, 2017 on Ratema
One of the cutest girls ever in an excellent set of photos. Tens to both Emmy and Matiss.
Sunday, April 2nd, 2017 on Ratema
I adore Serena but for me, this set is her worst. What a shame. I don't know what Nudero was thinking.
Saturday, April 1st, 2017 on Madote
You can't blame Charles. His camera didn't come with a manual.
Thursday, March 30th, 2017 on Presenting Melody Wylde
An amazing set of a gorgeous girl. I'm also glad that Dave Lee doesn't do what way too many photographers do on here–deliberately lower the quality of their images in the name of art! Well, it may be art but it's bad art. When there are pictures of Abraham Lincoln more clear than the ones you are taking, it should be a clue that you are doing something wrong.
Thank you Mr. Lee for taking beautiful, clear images of a beautiful girl.
Wednesday, March 29th, 2017 on Mechini
This set is glorius!
Wednesday, March 29th, 2017 on Mynrea
Are you commenting on the pictures above or another set???
Beautiful girl, but why did she have to purposely make the image quality so bad???
Monday, March 27th, 2017 on Presenting Tempe
I'm sorry but I cannot understand why MetArt continues to publish this photographer. They ask for ratings and comment but it doesn't seem like anyone there cares at all what the ratings and comments say. Then, there is Charles Lightfoot...
Friday, March 24th, 2017 on Taolmi
She may be about the Art side of MetArt, but you have to remember that there is good art and bad art. I think the ratings of her sets show that most people here think it's bad art.
Seriously? Are you commenting about the pictures above or some other model's?
Thursday, March 23rd, 2017 on Presenting Valera
Well, I couldn't disagree more.
Monday, March 20th, 2017 on Turine
She has done much better.
Saturday, March 18th, 2017 on Lepaan
There is no better combination than Nikia and Rylsky except for, perhaps, Nikia and me. She is the definition of beauty.
Thursday, March 16th, 2017 on Jadya
Way too short of a set. It has a beginning and middle but no end.
Tuesday, March 14th, 2017 on Wilena
Way too short. She is much better than this set. Too bad.
Tuesday, March 14th, 2017 on Smirea
Odara is gorgeous but the set of pictures is underwhelming. Totally uninspired.
Monday, March 13th, 2017 on Loddie
Should have had her lose the mask much sooner. Better..they could have left the props in the car. 10 for the model, 8 for the photographer.
Sunday, March 12th, 2017 on Presenting Cordoba
We are all here for the art, but some art is good and some bad. This is an example of the latter.
Saturday, March 11th, 2017 on Brinela
Someone should tell the photographer that when the power goes out it is a good time to take a break, not to take pictures in the dark. What a shame; the girl is beautiful but the set?
This guy hasn't got the slightest idea how to expose a shot. Grainy crap once again. There are pictures of Abraham Lincoln that have better image quality.
Saturday, March 11th, 2017 on Paradi
Wonderful in every respect.
Thursday, March 9th, 2017 on Presenting Georgia
A prettier face you will never find.
Monday, March 6th, 2017 on Doress
Did he actually think that thing on her head made her look better?
Monday, March 6th, 2017 on Abieri
Are you serious???????
Sunday, March 5th, 2017 on Nilesse
This set has a beginning and end but no middle. I love Emmy but this was disappointing.
It's so nice to see a photographer who knows how to expose (and compose) a picture. Maybe she can teach a couple of others on here who don't know that there are settings on their cameras for this. Excellent work Mrs. Koenart and welcome Shari-you're beautiful.
Sunday, March 5th, 2017 on Presenting Shari
Maybe Lightfoot should read the manual that came with his camera. I'm sorry but this guy is clueless in my opinion.
Saturday, March 4th, 2017 on Letena
Thursday, March 2nd, 2017 on Hunie
Ladies and gentlemen, THIS IS HOW IT'S DONE! A stunning girl and a photographer who knows how to take pictures as opposed to the ones who don't know how to expose a shot and whose pictures show up on here way too often. Thank you Carolina and Matiss. Superb!!!!
Wednesday, March 1st, 2017 on Tespera
You need to do more than call an unpopular set "art" to win the argument. Any photograph can be considered art. The thing you have to remember is that there is good art and bad art. Of course, good and bad are in the eyes of the beholder.
Saturday, February 25th, 2017 on Sectine
She should have lost the prop much much earlier. Too bad-a gorgeous woman done in by mosquito netting.
A pretty girl but the set was too short. It was over just when it got started.
Saturday, February 25th, 2017 on Tularia
Did he think she had the plague? Is that why he didn't get close? Speaking for myself, if his work was never published on this site again, it would be an improvement. Sorry to be so blunt, but I don't think I'm the only one and it has been going on for a while.
Saturday, February 25th, 2017 on Presenting Taressa
I wonder if I am looking at the same site as you. I could not disagree more with your comment.
Wednesday, February 22nd, 2017 on Renalca
For me, you can just post a set with Nikia everyday and you won't need any other models. I find her the most adorable girl in the universe. It doesn't get any better.
Tuesday, February 14th, 2017 on Derosa
What a gorgeous girl.
Tuesday, February 14th, 2017 on Love
Too short. The set had a beginning and end but no middle.
Sunday, February 12th, 2017 on Mossa
Her face can cure all ailments!
Saturday, February 11th, 2017 on Edofi
Lightfoot produces crap time after time after time.
Saturday, February 11th, 2017 on Presenting Misty Lovelace
Pretty girl but I don't think the photographer knew what he wanted to do.
Thursday, February 9th, 2017 on Presenting Gloia
Gorgeous as ever...one of the prettiest faces in the world. But this is not one of her best sets.
Monday, February 6th, 2017 on Dezyre
A gorgeous woman but I find the set quite boring.
Monday, February 6th, 2017 on Karemn
Making all the images look like grainy crap is considered art now? Seriously? I'm beginning to think this photographer is blind.
Saturday, February 4th, 2017 on Nalidu
She is a dream. I will never understand why her overall rating is only 8.97. For my tastes, her's is the rating most off on this site.
Friday, February 3rd, 2017 on Tondal
Saturday, January 28th, 2017 on Eniza
Are you referring to the set of pictures above or another set?
Friday, January 27th, 2017 on Presenting Kira
The set ended too abruptly. She is an adorable girl but I would have done the hair differently; however, it didn't impact her body :)
Thursday, January 26th, 2017 on Naceera
A rather uninspired set of a stunning woman. She's one of my top models but this is far from one of my favorite sets. Was he somehow forced to shoot her from a distance without a zoom lens?
Tuesday, January 24th, 2017 on Loroan
Didn't anyone at the shoot have the sense to say "get that thing off of her head"? What on earth was the photographer thinking?
Tuesday, January 24th, 2017 on Minne
Yet another set of mostly improperly exposed pictures by Charles Lightfoot. Does he do this on purpose or is he clueless? How can a guy ruin what otherwise would have been a spectacular set? Does he think it is art to wash out a picture? Maybe the next time he will leave the lens cap on and call that art too. I'm sorry to be so blunt but I find his style rather absurd...if it is a style.
Monday, January 23rd, 2017 on Mavin
Monday, January 23rd, 2017 on Leiran
Friday, January 20th, 2017 on Presenting Keita
A gorgeous woman in a substandard film...my opinion anyway.
Sunday, January 15th, 2017 on Friday
I'm sorry but Lightfoot should have his camera taken away. This is supposed to be art? Not for me. What a shame.
Sunday, January 15th, 2017 on Presenting Misty Lovelace
The most adorable girl in the world,
Sunday, January 15th, 2017 on Panara
Quite an uninspired set.
Saturday, January 14th, 2017 on Neniz
I will never understand why it seems that the lighting is deliberately made substandard and the photos grainy. Is that supposed to make the pictures more artistic or more annoying to look at? To each his own, I guess. Other than that, she's gorgeous.
Friday, January 13th, 2017 on Matora
Wednesday, January 11th, 2017 on Vulleya
A stunning girl. However, the set is a little light on pictures.
Tuesday, January 10th, 2017 on Presenting Florina
One of the prettiest faces in the world and a body to go with it! Her smile can cure me of anything.
Monday, January 9th, 2017 on Renco
Some people just feel the need to be negative? Really? So, it is not possible that some people find the setting ridiculous because you don't? You have an interesting perspective.
Saturday, January 7th, 2017 on Presenting Carly
What's to understand? It is ridiculous. How many other sets on here are shot in front of shelving?
I don't understand the backdrop for this set at all. However, Carly is absolutely adorable. Perhaps we'll see her in a much better setting next time.
Rylsky, how do you manage to get way more than your share of the most adorable girls in the world and manage to produce the most amazing sets of pictures on this site? You're not allowed to retire until after I die.
Thursday, January 5th, 2017 on Clocen
I just don't get this set.
Thursday, January 5th, 2017 on Xyret
Monday, January 2nd, 2017 on Melian
Beautiful body, beautiful face, beautiful expressions. Can't ask for more.
Monday, January 2nd, 2017 on Nuria
A wonderful debut.
Sunday, January 1st, 2017 on Presenting Nessie
28 pictures sadly diminished by a ridiculous headpiece...in my opinion anyway. The rest were quite exceptional.
Sunday, January 1st, 2017 on Janyo
Adorable girl but the set was way too short.
Sunday, January 1st, 2017 on Noate
She's a gorgeous girl but I find the set quite uninspired.
Saturday, December 31st, 2016 on Roderi
A gorgeous girl in a not so gorgeous set. Oh well, hopefully there will be others coming soon.
Thursday, December 29th, 2016 on Sontize
Did I see the same set? The one above these comments is one of the worst I've seen on this site.
Wednesday, December 28th, 2016 on Alytha
Wednesday, December 28th, 2016 on Mebri
Paramov? Are you kidding? She would be better off being photographed by her cat...in my opinion.
Tuesday, December 27th, 2016 on Perau
Monday, December 26th, 2016 on Marrona
I don't know, but for me, this is an example of why they should skip girl/girl sets on here. And doesn't the photographer have a zoom lens? Anyway, I'm glad some of you enjoyed it.
Friday, December 23rd, 2016 on Lemmaz
In my opinion, don't even bother doing girl/girl sets if this is as far as you go. I find them all extremely disappointing even when they contain my favorite models. You can't fake intimacy between two girls this way. I'm sorry but it just doesn't work for me and many others considering the comments and the ratings. Does MetArt even pay attention?
Wednesday, December 21st, 2016 on Maldezi
Gorgeous in every way possible.
Wednesday, December 21st, 2016 on Cenyth
Wednesday, December 14th, 2016 on Zaluda
He criticizes you so you call him stupid? Not very professional or mature.
Monday, December 12th, 2016 on Pazale
It's hard to understand why anyone thought such obviously fake eyes would make the pictures better. Oh well.
Friday, December 9th, 2016 on Feniza
She is as pretty as a girl can get.
Tuesday, December 6th, 2016 on Traise
Monday, December 5th, 2016 on Meziya
You must have looked at the wrong set and commented here. I find this one excellent.
Tuesday, November 29th, 2016 on Restode
The lighting is terrible; she is quite washed out.
Monday, November 28th, 2016 on Latvian Pie
I agree that the location was awful, but that aside, I think the shot selection was quite wonderful.
Saturday, November 26th, 2016 on Tanoe
Saturday, November 26th, 2016 on Zeridal
I couldn't disagree more. I wonder if we are talking about the same pictures.
Thursday, November 24th, 2016 on Tholes
The lighting is horrible. I'm surprised these were shown to anyone and I'm even more surprised that MetArt published them. Kika is gorgeous; the photos are not. Anyway, that's my opinion.
Wednesday, November 23rd, 2016 on Meeta
It would be impossible for me to disagree with you any more than I do.
Wednesday, November 23rd, 2016 on Porrea
I have run out of words for Nikia. The only thing left to say is WOWWWWWW. There is Nikia and then there is everyone else.
Sunday, November 20th, 2016 on Janeca
One of my favorite girls but a disappointing set.
Friday, November 18th, 2016 on Crefia
Thursday, November 17th, 2016 on Cellati
Girl/Girl sets on here are always disappointing. For me, it just doesn't work unless the girls are actually enjoying each other's bodies in some way. MetArt style works fine for solo shoots, but not when there is more than one girl...in my opinion.
Wednesday, November 16th, 2016 on Levitate
She is stunning, but it is as if someone went through the set and deliberately took out all of the naughty shots. Very disappointed.
Wednesday, November 16th, 2016 on Harra
Cute beyond words, but the set is too short :(
Monday, November 14th, 2016 on Presenting Jennifer Hart
You forgive him, I thank him :)
Sunday, November 13th, 2016 on Calatha
One of the prettiest faces in the world, and the rest of her isn't too bad either!
Thursday, November 10th, 2016 on Pilcada
A gorgeous girl in perhaps her most boring set. Unfortunately, it's what I have come to expect from this photographer.
Sunday, November 6th, 2016 on Cenmai
Outside of that , what you said that Rose said (and Rose, I have no idea what you said on the topic) does not tell us why the sets are shorter. It merely states the obvious tells us what we already know—some of the sets are shorter. My question is WHY are they shorter. Has anyone from MetArt actually said why?
Tuesday, November 1st, 2016 on Steria
One of the prettiest faces in the world, and a body to match.
Tuesday, November 1st, 2016 on Enetija
I don't think you understood a thing that I said.
Has MetArt officially said why the sets are shorter? If not, with all this discussion/complaining about it, why not? I for one cannot understand why anyone would say an 80 photo set could be diminished by adding 40 mor photos EVEN IF THOSE 40 PHOTOS ARE DUPLICATES OF THE LAST PHOTO. Look at and keep the ones you want. Having said that, I also cannot understand why sometimes you do see several "near duplicates." If you are going to include a picture, shouldn't it be somewhat different than what's already there? That answer to that issue is not shorter sets (let's face it, make the sets just a single picture and the problem is perfectly solved) but a smarter choice of what to include.
Monday, October 31st, 2016 on Steria
The excitement is there because most people strongly disagree with you. Don't worry. It happens and to some more than others.
Saturday, October 29th, 2016 on Presenting Elena Koshka
Such a hot girl but this was not her best set.
Sunday, October 23rd, 2016 on Parrafe
A beautiful girl in a completely uninspired set.
Saturday, October 22nd, 2016 on Presenting Carisse
Gorgeous beyond words.
Friday, October 21st, 2016 on Yaminca
Where was her butt?
Tuesday, October 18th, 2016 on Ebatee
The clicking during (or part of?) the music was incredibly annoying. Otherwise, excellent.
Sunday, October 16th, 2016 on Glory Horizon
Sunday, October 16th, 2016 on Tomida
Probably the most disappointing set in a long time.
Sunday, October 16th, 2016 on Lavado
Gorgeous. Nothing more to say than that.
Monday, October 10th, 2016 on Rivona
Who said blondes are the best?
Monday, October 10th, 2016 on Presenting Shirley Tate
Monday, October 10th, 2016 on Newtie
I think the pictures of her on the floor of the shower were ruined by the shadows on her. It could have been a much better set.
Monday, October 10th, 2016 on Kiosona
I thought the Kylie video was fine; otherwise, I agree.
Sunday, October 9th, 2016 on Opina
Sorry but I found this set quite boring.
Sunday, October 9th, 2016 on Eniza
Sunday, October 9th, 2016 on Sillome
Am I the only one who thinks he managed to make a beautiful girl look ridiculous? Oh well. I guess some of you appreciate this.
Friday, October 7th, 2016 on Phoseta
I simply cannot see how a set is too long. Just look at the pictures you want. It's not hard, really...try it sometime.
Thursday, October 6th, 2016 on Madlae
Pure perfection in every respect!
Thursday, October 6th, 2016 on Esithe
A beautiful woman but a terrible set. The pictures are mostly the same. Oh well.
Thursday, October 6th, 2016 on Lynoma
Her face alone could revive the dead.
Saturday, October 1st, 2016 on Harne
Rylsky, do you manufacture these girls in your basement? How do you manage to find such perfection so often? She is freaking adorable.
Saturday, October 1st, 2016 on Presenting Alice May
Gorgeous from head to toe.
Saturday, October 1st, 2016 on Delamia
She has the prettiest face in the world!!!!
Friday, September 30th, 2016 on Avadu
I found the shots with the iPad silly. Otherwise, quite excellent.
Thursday, September 29th, 2016 on Rilma
It's okay if the girl looks at the camera every now and then. Really, it is. I prefer it.
Tuesday, September 27th, 2016 on Morpheus
She's beautiful beyond words but I find this far from her best set.
Tuesday, September 20th, 2016 on Sallen
A beautiful girl in a boring set.
Sunday, September 18th, 2016 on Lartre
I'm sorry but this girl is too beautiful to be wasted like this. Just my opinion.
Friday, September 16th, 2016 on Alytha
A great set if you overlook the lighting. She is a bit washed out in all of the pictures.
Monday, September 12th, 2016 on Miliran
She has the most beautiful vagina ever and to me, that's what this set was about. I can see her standing another time. There are endless ways a model can be photographed and every set does not need to cover every possibility. She is an extremely beautiful woman and I think anyone would be able to see that from this set.. They might not think she is extremely beautiful but they certainly have enough pictures to judge for themselves. As to some of the pictures being awkward, while it can certainly be someones opinion, my opinion would be that the person does not know the meaning of the word awkward.
Sunday, September 11th, 2016 on Sonerue
The blue boots were absurd; otherwise, one of the better non-solo shoots, which I usually find quite disappointing on here.
Saturday, September 10th, 2016 on Karedi
A disappointing selection of poses.
Saturday, September 10th, 2016 on Presenting Veronika Mink
Emmy is gorgeous, the shooting set is not.
Tuesday, September 6th, 2016 on Carpa
It's okay to let her look at the camera occasionally. Really, it is.
Sunday, September 4th, 2016 on Artist Secret
Um, I think he was talking about the other photos where his assertion is correct.
Sunday, September 4th, 2016 on Narosy
Did someone tell her to NEVER look at the camera? I would think someone who takes stellar still photos would know better than this. Even if this is nothing more than a video shot during a photo shoot, how much trouble would it have been to occasionally tell her "now look at this camera for a minute"? Having said that, Estelle has a body from heaven. While her eyes may have averted, her breasts certainly stared at the lens.
Sunday, September 4th, 2016 on Sincerela
She's better than this set.
Sunday, September 4th, 2016 on Agros
Macy is so much better than you would guess from this set.
Saturday, September 3rd, 2016 on Hanie
Sometimes I just cannot understand what the photographer was thinking. Serena is capable of so much more than this set.
Friday, September 2nd, 2016 on Rayto
I"m sorry but Domenic Mayer has no idea how to photograph her. Compare his two sets to the Flora sets and it is obvious.
Wednesday, August 31st, 2016 on Nociora
Once again Rylsky has struck gold...or platinum...or diamonds... This girl is perfection.
Saturday, August 27th, 2016 on Presenting Aurmi
Why didn't anyone at the shoot have sense enough to grab the wreath and throw it out? I realize that some people may have actually like it, but really?
Wednesday, August 24th, 2016 on Ogeta
Wednesday, August 10th, 2016 on Nariett
Absolute perfection. There's nothing else to say.
Wednesday, August 10th, 2016 on Santola
The tulips didn't belong in this set.
Tuesday, August 2nd, 2016 on Poua
I'm curious how you would know that she wasn't judged over the whole shoot. Is it just the case that when people disagree with you that they must be looking at the whole thing wrong? There are lots of people who vote and their tastes vary considerably. Personally, I was very excited by the first several pictures. I rarely look at a set one picture after another without scanning the thumbnails but I did so with this one because of the first few. However, my opinion went down the more I saw. While she has an appealing look (to me, I rated her a 9) I found the set quite boring (a 7). I look at the last 13 pictures and wonder why there are 13 of them. Anyway, lots of people will disagree with you lots of times and it's not because they are doing something wrong (and many wonder what you might be doing wrong).
Saturday, July 16th, 2016 on Presenting Veronika Benet
It doesn't get any better than this.
Sunday, July 10th, 2016 on Mareta
Perfection in every way possible.
Sunday, July 10th, 2016 on Lossir
Friday, July 8th, 2016 on Lardie
Thursday, June 23rd, 2016 on Minarie
The shots with the daisy were moronic but otherwise an excellent set.
Thursday, June 23rd, 2016 on Follise
I absolutely adore this girl but I have to ask why they had a cat do her hair? The clothed shots at the end are Nikia!
Wednesday, June 22nd, 2016 on Tostie
I loved the model and set until I got to number 48 which is in front of the door. It looked to me like a different model and set. I actually had to go back to the index and make sure I was looking at the same girl. Oh well. It started out great and then...
Wednesday, June 22nd, 2016 on Presenting Emanuelle
By definition, buttock shots cannot be repetitious, especially hers :)
Saturday, June 18th, 2016 on Zorensi
I absolutely love Divina but most of these pictures don't even look like her. This is a very disappointing set.
Thursday, June 16th, 2016 on Caziru
What a change after that dreadful first set. She is adorable!
Monday, June 13th, 2016 on Perlena
What can I say except someone should buy Natasha a light for Christmas. I just don't think nude women were meant to be photographed in the dark. I get that it's her style and give her some credit for sticking to it, but it's not for me.
Tuesday, June 7th, 2016 on Presenting Sheana
Thursday, June 2nd, 2016 on Lerochi
Wednesday, June 1st, 2016 on Presenting Marit
Breasts too big? Are you talking about the girl in the pictures above?
Thursday, May 26th, 2016 on Presenting Janah
Your point is "either close this comment section or"? Or what? You never finished the sentence but you call other comments pretentious dribble? You can carry on like this but others should shut up? And it's the others that are pretentious? Everyone has an opinion. Some will align with yours and some will be directly opposite yours. It will always be like that.
Sunday, May 22nd, 2016 on Posarte
Dream? It's more like a nightmare.
Tuesday, May 17th, 2016 on Presenting Lily Sands
Tuesday, May 17th, 2016 on Tercare
She's my favorite but the video is quite disappointing.
Monday, May 16th, 2016 on Latria
I'm not sure how you concluded that just because stats are displayed they must be accurate. Have you ever heard of a mistake? I too find it hard to believe she's 5'1" and 130 lbs.
Monday, May 16th, 2016 on Yerula
You can certainly dress a girl in a way to "inspire all kinds of naughty fantasies", but the problem for me is that this set conjures up fantasies involving girls other than the one in the pictures. I doubt that you or the model would ever go to a costume party dressed like she is in this set.
Friday, April 29th, 2016 on Presenting Lily Sands
Romantic scene? This is no more a romantic scene than it is the inside of an internal combustion engine.
Some people like to give their opinion and sometimes it is not a positive opinion. If this is a perfect introduction of a model, then all introductions are perfect...in my opinion.
I must strongly disagree. It is ridiculous.
Utterly ridiculous costume. Didn't anyone have the sense to say something during the shoot?
Another beautiful girl wasted by Natasha. Sorry, but photographing a nude woman with the lights out is not my cup of tea.
Thursday, April 28th, 2016 on Raasen
Many would disagree :)
Wednesday, April 13th, 2016 on Enadis
Lose the flowers next time. There is nothing natural about her wearing them; they just look silly.
Sunday, April 3rd, 2016 on Doniera
It is interesting that you picked one of the more lit photos to highlight.
Thursday, March 17th, 2016 on Presenting Sofi Shane
Perhaps he just doesn't think it is beautiful. The model yes, the photography, no. And you just can't call bad photography art and expect to win the argument. Beauty and art are in the eye of the beholder.
Wednesday, March 16th, 2016 on Presenting Sofi Shane
Her breasts are spectacular.
Friday, March 11th, 2016 on Piery
The most adorable girl ever in a spectacular set of pictures.
Friday, March 4th, 2016 on Lejanda
Spectacular pictures of a spectacular girl. Nothing else needs to be said.
Saturday, February 27th, 2016 on Clarime
What a waste of a beautiful model.
Monday, February 15th, 2016 on Ditamre
Is this really her? Terrible set of pictures if it is.
Monday, February 1st, 2016 on Slanym
Jewelry is supposed to add to the picture. However, her necklace is a ridiculous item on an otherwise stunning girl. No one noticed during the shoot? Hard to imagine.
Saturday, December 12th, 2015 on Issare
What a waste and for such a sexy girl.
Monday, November 30th, 2015 on Begieta
What a waste. A third grader with a broken iPhone could have gotten better pictures.
Thursday, November 26th, 2015 on Wame
Yes, they should have the guts to try something experimental, but this experiment failed. This set is complete garbage. The model should sue.
Friday, October 30th, 2015 on Presenting Leah Gotti
What a horrible set of pictures. Have you lost your mind? Do you have dead camels photographing your models now?
Are these pictures supposed to look better because they are grainy and a bit washed out?
Saturday, October 17th, 2015 on Dearc
She has one of the prettiest faces in the world and this set does the best job of capturing it since the very first set. Stunning pictures on every level.
Wednesday, October 7th, 2015 on Monata
What is the purpose of the crown of flowers? Does the photographer really think they add beauty to EVERY picture? To ANY picture?
Wednesday, October 7th, 2015 on Saleja
A bunch of overexposed pictures. How did they get posted on here?
Monday, July 6th, 2015 on Stalosi
Beautiful model but an awful set of pictures.
Thursday, June 11th, 2015 on Anico
No one at the shoot had the sense to say that the grass on he head was idiotic? My god, how does something like this happen?
Sunday, June 7th, 2015 on Presenting Victory
Jeff is mesmerizing, but her hair is dead in this set. It has no body at all.
Wednesday, November 19th, 2014 on Jemne
I don't get it. How can you take someone as gorgeous as Nikia and produce such a disappointing shoot. Her hair and makeup are awful. Fortunately, there are many stellar pictures of this girl to look at.
Wednesday, November 19th, 2014 on Vitra
Natascha´s style is becoming increasingly incongrous with whatever this staff has chosen this website to be.
Remember she's here since the very start,when things looked and were soo much different.
I´ve wasted two entire years of my life in all kinds of phillipicas about image quality,among other things, in a never ending series of useless comments.
No doubt Lightfoot knows how to deliver excellent images;but he´s committed to using natural light,and stubbornly sets the light behind the model.So,backlit implies high ISO settings,resulting in lots of artifacts and noise.Slightly moving the model aside or using light fill is an easy solution to deal with this situation,but Charles refuses to do it,and there´s someone somewhere who has clearly made an effort to make him succeed with such a garbage.
In the case of Schön,she´s a genius imho,trying to deal with darkness,in her constant recreations of female intimacy.Then,stopping down lens,low shutter speeds,shallow depth of field.Something very hard to deal with.
Two cases of low quality images,two very different reasons.
Thanks for your opinion and sorry for the lenght.
Sometimes it looks like he's using cheap equipment for taking pictures. As you said, those models deserve much better.
Monday, October 2nd, 2017 on Tonoe
Charles need to change what ever he smokes
Less for the same price, but we're supposed to love it because now artist creativity is not impaired by that magic 120 photo number. Things WERE better here just a year ago.
Another set with lower picture quality. I couldn't believe it was Arkisi that shot it.
Twice or threetimes, I'd like to click "Your Opinion".
Monday, September 25th, 2017 on Presenting Elin
I think he found the back lights he should have been using all this time
On the whole -- a pretty tame set.
This girl has the potential to be HOT !!
Instead, we get bland --
You´re oh,so right. Sir
Tuesday, August 29th, 2017 on Presenting Carolina Sweets
You have got used to something similar to all the rest. I don't want to resemble others. Both of us have the right for the opinion.
No matter what, SOMEBODY is not going to like it.
Yea, full of discontent towards some of the ignorants who keeps showing up in the comments section looking for plain sharp HD porn shots without any artistic flare, completely overlooking the fact that the name of the site is called MetArt...
Thanks for the back up... LOL
Ho Hum...where are the pussy shots?
Have to agree with you on this one. The exposure on the lens and lighting is just horrid!
Yes, it is another fantastic set from CL with the lovely Nina North.
Why do you focus always on CL and the quality of his photos? You will not change his style. It is also somehow dull. Every time the same criticism.
Consider the models of CL. They ALL are worth it. They ALL are sensational. This includes Nina.
I do agree,it makes the comment section rather superferlous if they are totally disregarded.I see his work is featured rather a lot in Met Art x.No Thank you.
i agree, when it comes to ammount of girls, less is usually more and i get more turned on just by 1. personally i never really had a 3some fantasy or lesbian fetish. i prefer to just focus on 1 girl at a time. more romantic to me
Sunday, June 25th, 2017 on Presenting Marca
The point is that you're being polite and not rude or ignorant towards the model or photographer.
Take a look at the comments in the "Presenting" set with Kitty Nice. Although 99% of the postings are positive, I'm sure that there are a few members out there who _don't_ like either Nimfa, the set or the photographer.
What was it I'm sure we've all heard sometime in our past - If you can't say something nice don't say anything at all.
In this age of verbal evulsion brought about by the explosion of the cyberverse it seems that anyone with a piece of technology now has found a bully pulpit for their feelings, regardless of how it may effect anyone else.
Thursday, June 15th, 2017 on Presenting Megan Rain
> Moreover, this guy gets published a lot. Quite frankly, I don't understand why.
My take on this is that MET buys way more than just the sets shown here from him (and others as well), but he (and others) fails to shoot actually erotic sets but just plain porn. Thus the "porn" part of there sets get posted on SexArt and MetArt X and everything that's left over is posted on other MET-Network sites.
That's also the reason why in most of his sets the picture's order is (sometimes awfully) scrambled - something that is also quite annoying. Not even a scrambled left-over porn set is transformed to "art" that way.
I fully agree. I would like to see those beautiful models in other hands than this photographer. Most of his shootings are either blurry, poor lighting or like this one poor quality. Please Kylie find another photographer, you deserve so much better.
Saturday, June 3rd, 2017 on Rizeti
Don't confuse "date published" with "date shot". K has many, many sets in her "unpublished" archives waiting for the light of day to surface hereabouts.
In many cases they just need better equipment. Other things equal, newer better cameras take better photos. It's almost criminal to have such amazingly beautiful models pose as they do and then take poor photos. MA should insist that these photographers upgrade their equipment.
3 big problems would be solved with better equipment: grainy photos, depth of focus, and lighting issues.
The artistic creativity of the model and photographer would then shine through.
Or, alternatively, Mr. Guzman has learned to take a picture in a style different from the style of perfectly wonderful pictures taken by Mr. Lightfoot.
Give it a rest.
Feedback, to be of ANY valid use, must be descriptive. "I didn't like it.", "Boring." and other such nondescript phrases tell others, as well as the photographer, absolutely nothing about how the viewer felt the execution of the set failed. If one is to accept the fact that the comments section can be a move towards a more positive experience, one HAS to be pointedly descriptive about the comments left here. (Notice I said "descriptive" and not "derogatory". Name-calling directed at photographers and models should never be tolerated here.) If not, then the photographer, model or other members for that matter, can garner no useful information from such terse comments.
Because, sir or madam, if this site were to be operating on the funds provided by the 2-3 dozen members who bother to comment, much less the 5 who bellyache about Mr. Lightfoot's work, it would be out of business faster than you could say, well, anything.
There are thousands of members who either don't agree with you, or don't agree enough to bother to type up a snarky comment about his work. I rarely bother to comment. I have bothered to do so twice today, both times because of the non-stop whining over MET's recent more frequent publication of Mr. Lightfoot's work. You get four sets each and every day. FOUR! Make room in your world for some variety of artistic vision and expression.
For me, Emily's alabaster skin makes her all the more beautiful.
Legal Definition of pornography
: material that depicts erotic behavior and is intended to cause sexual excitement
Definition of erotica
: literary or artistic works having an erotic theme or quality
: depictions of things erotic
If you like Lightfoot's jaundice-like style, this is for you. Based on his poor rating, not many members do!
Sums it up pretty well. Steal his camera and give it to DeltaGamma (who actually had his camera stolen)! Or else MA stop buying the degraded quality sets.
from the viewpoint of all Chazza's presentations,and the happiness i have experienced, especially in the ebony beauties,i would say that he is doing extremely well,and should the opportunity come my way to meet that fellow,maybe we would share a nice bottle or two.Chablis.Two bottles of Chablis.
And we would have such a larf about stupid cunts that have no respect.
See my reply to UK100ByeEU above.
Agreed. Beautiful girl, fantastic poses, HORRID photo quality. Charles consistently puts out grainy, horrible quality photos.
Spot On mate:)
Friday, April 28th, 2017 on Paradi
It's the photographer.
In the few & far in between explicit shots, Margot does not look inhibited at all. The photographer chose mostly "filler" shots for this set, and it serves Margot poorly, IMHO.
Thursday, April 27th, 2017 on Presenting Margot Reese
er- how about a lovely girl posing naked?
not exactly rocket science...
If you truly love pictures, ie photography, you might be expected to know that photographs, and photographers, come in all sorts and types.
I am not a big fan of Ms. Schon's work... but I do appreciate variety, and figure that a set or two of hers amongst all the Arkisi and Leonardo etc. sets might just expand my appreciation of both the art of photography and the female form... so I always check out her sets, and then I go on to others whose style I prefer.
In other words, it takes all kinds of people (and phtographers, and picture lovers) to make the world go around. Up your tolerance for difference, and appreciate what those differences have to offer... it makes for a richer and fuller world, and life.
What you said is what I hope to say. Wake up, MetArt !
Sure, some of the duos "work" better than others. But it depends what you want out of it - and what angle the photographer takes. Sometimes if the photographer is going for a 'lesbian lover' angle it doesn't come across with the right chemistry - but there are definitely plenty of sets on MA where that chemistry is there. But another approach is just the 'girls hanging out naked together' kind of set - I think plenty of Goncharov's earlier sets fit into that category, for example.
Besides, even if all else fails, there's still TWO beautiful female bodies to admire, not just one. It seems pretty surreal I'm in the comments section of MA defending seeing multiple naked bodies in one set - I know the world's gone crazy and all, but that crazy?!
Thursday, April 13th, 2017 on Evona
Agreed. Lets scrub all future duo sets - they just do not work well on this site.
Grate mines thimk allike. ;-))
I agree with you PL. I don't feel that calling it art should be an excuse for low quality. My point is that the only one that appears to be buying this retro-quality stuff from CL is Met-Art. If you look at CL's stuff elsewhere, and even on his own website, you don't see grainy pics. Why is that? Does no one else want it? I have to wonder if there were no outlet for the retro-style pics, would they still be produced?
I get the grain issue at 100%, but other than that I honestly don't know what people are complaining about.
Tell you one thing, Picture Lover as well as Dark_Storm. Indiana blends nicely into those buttercups. Not the other way round. Matiss shows us, that the beauty of one woman nearly can compete with that perfection, nature gives us. Thank you Matiss.
Thursday, April 6th, 2017 on Haneta
He was probably thinking 'that Picture Lover is a total asshat;
I disagree with your statement about "...good art and bad art." Good and bad are completely subjective adjectives, especially when used in the field of art and, to my mind, have no real place being used in connection with "art". Yes, there can be bad physical "execution" in the field of art - mis-processed prints, poor welding techniques, mis-registration of color screens, but that all refers to the execution of the piece of art, not to it's content or, for that matter, intent.
The ratings, again being entirely subjective, show only that many members don't like Ms. Schon's work, not "bad" or "good" art, only that _they_ don't like it.
no, there are many members who downvote every set with less than 50 pussy shots and upvote everything with more than 40 pussy closeups.
That's because you should have had an orgasm by #68! : )
Wednesday, March 15th, 2017 on Wilena
The exposure is perfect, but ya he needs to lower the ISO a bit to get rid of the grain.
Tuesday, March 14th, 2017 on Paradi
"Good art - bad art". Not wanting to sound smarmy or nothing, but who died and made you the art police?
Beauty in the eye of the beholder, eh?
Sunday, March 12th, 2017 on Brinela
im sad at the lack of butt shots ;(
Monday, March 6th, 2017 on Nilesse
Couldn't agree more. Hats don't work for me and certainly not garlands.
What's not to like? The overexposure is quite deliberate, modern DSLR have such accurate meters, and the focus is what he is aiming for. You might not like it, as a matter of personal choice, but that's his style. And there can be no doubt that Valeria is a cute pretty girl. 8)
Reasonable response, but anything that tends toward "art" here gets lower ratings, hence, my comment.
Sunday, February 26th, 2017 on Sectine
The photographer is a she ,delicious Michelle H .
It's called stubbornness. I am sure he hears loud and clear but he chooses to be his own fan club and to heck with what we think! Sad when he has so really outstanding models that deserve better!
No, he's not blind, he has done good (sharper) work and his videos are better. I just don't believe that quality should be sacrificed in the name of art. There are some good poses and shots here if they were only in step with Met's motto "Fine Photography." And of course Valeria herself is beautiful and has done her part.
Some even equals him to impressionists
Imposible.Charles carefully cleans all his equipment,including memory cards in a washing machine,before the next shoot
Sadly this is his stated "style" Why I will never understand! With today's fantastic equipment and a tiny effort anyone can make crystal clear photos of a beautiful and talented model like Valeria. :(
Seems you are the only one who finds it ridiculous. I don't see your comments garner many thumbs up. If you care to look back through the archives you will find numerous sets photographed in front of shelving and many other non related items, I don't see why these particular shelves offend you so much? If you look at the other comments on this page you will find that they are overwhelmingly positive. Why then rock the boat because you take offense that she wasn't shot elsewhere.
What's to understand about it? It'simple and does not detract from Carly displaying her charms. I don't have a problem with it. Certainly an alternative to another bed set.
I agree, putting those stupid ears on a beauty like Carolina is totally ridiculous! Please leave the theatrics to Paromcv so I can simply not look at them! They were a VERY poor idea the first time around and just plain obnoxious the second! Seeing this sort of thing from one of my favorite artists is big disappointment.
Amelie is as beautiful as always, but there are far too few glimpses of her superlative bum. There are plenty of standing views from the front, but none at all of her from the rear. Please do not disappoint with her next appearance and do proper justice to that sensational rear posterior.
Hahaha : ) Not a fan of Paramov eh?? I enjoy some of his fanciful sets, I think are very creative, he certainly has a wild imagination. Plus I thought he had some nice sets with Camomile who I wish would make an appearance here soon. ; )
Well, you can always just not click on them.
I am in full agreement. Girl/girl sets do absolutely nothing for me!
If you want gynecology clinic lighting and detail, lots of porn sights will be pleased to cater to you, Nina has worked for a number of them too.
Sunday, December 11th, 2016 on Dearc
because some people like that?
if blurred to death or hairy like an ewok turns people on, there is certainly a demographic who likes contacts like these. The demographic who doesn't really care is probably even bigger than those who instantly got sand into their vaginas.
On my weekend (when I get time to unzip and enjoy these properly), this set was such a poke in the eye with its horrible tint, that I batch processed it through Lightroom with a tint adjustment of -30. Not the same as a proper white balance adjustment on raw files, I know, but it balanced her skin to something like you'd expect of a human. My god, this was awful presentation.
Friday, December 2nd, 2016 on Restode
You're right, Picture Lover, I did not read your comment carefully enough and I went off half cocked. Please pardon me, and please pardon me for misrepresenting what you in fact said.
Wednesday, November 2nd, 2016 on Steria
Re-reading your comment, Picture Lover, I can see why you feel that way.
Hi Picture Lover, some of the sets are shorter because they were shot and submitted to us since the rules were relaxed. We used to insist that photographers submitted a minimum number of shots. We have relaxed that rule because many members complained that this led to repetition and to shots being included that would probably not have been there if the artists had been allowed to submit a tighter edit. The artists also told us that having this strict constraint meant they were sometimes including shots they didn't like, just to make the minimum number. So, the intention is to have tighter quality control and more artistic freedom for the photographers.
Picture Lover, Rose has officially told us that MA has "relaxed" the old 120 photo set standard. The new shorter sets tend to be between 80 - 90 shots, i.e. approx 2/3 the old set.
I TOTALLY understand that some members such as yourself were complaining vocally about "overly repetitious" shots. While disagreeing that that is actually a problem, I can see why you feel this way.
The problem is this.
Some of us members such as myself, actually LIKE and ENJOY the "repetitious shots." I WANT to see nice sequences within a pose, more than only three shots, which seems to be the unofficial limit nowadays.
I LOVE going through a nice long 120 photo set and poring over every photo in a sequence, enjoying the slight but significant changes in the model's expression, her positioning of her limbs and body, the FEEL of enjoying a long, luxurious, loving look at the model in one single pose.
A member like you is free to skip as much of the "repetitious" sequence as you wish, choosing to click on only one or two, or save only one or two if you download.
On the other hand, once that sequence has been shortened to between one and three shots, members like myself who prefer the long sequences do NOT get to indulge OUR desires and enjoy the entire sequence.
I'm NOT saying you're wrong in the way you like to enjoy a photoset and I'm NOT criticizing you or the members that feel the way you do.
I am simply saying that, by indulging the wishes of members like you, MA is now contradicting the desires of members like me. When, had the old standard prevailed, you are perfectly free to pick and choose only those best shots that you prefer for yourself ~ while leaving me free to enjoy a long, lingering loving sequence of the models I love.
Sittin' on a boat
Wednesday, October 19th, 2016 on Ebatee
P L, why was it disappointing? Posting an opinion without giving the reasons piques our interest ~ well, our nosiness.
Monday, October 17th, 2016 on Lavado
The set could have used some better lighting, especially for the shower floor.
Tuesday, October 11th, 2016 on Kiosona
I'm curious why you two think this was a bad lineup? What was bad about it, if you'd care to share? (No sarcasm, simply my unending noseyness)
Monday, October 10th, 2016 on Opina
It's easier for me to appreciate an elaborately costumed model by Paromov than a painting by Pablo Picasso.
Tastes differ. Between people, and over time for the same person.
Personally, I agree with Paromov's eye for attractive females.
Even if I wouldn't dress them the same way Paromov does.
With all the discussion today about quality and quantity this is a perfect example for me at least of what is good and not so good on MA. The Model is outstanding, the length of photo count is good, the technical level of photographs is good, the styling is good. The stand off view mostly full length through out is repetitive, dull and uninspiring to look at and creates little interaction with the viewer. There I've said it now, this set is for me a conundrum it offered on first viewing a good platform but in the end didn't deliver for me.
Not only does he find consistently beautiful young women but also talented, fun young things loaded with personality! That's what makes the difference. They are not just beautiful they are real and seem to genuinely enjoy what they are doing! Rylsky has the gift of turning young beauties into stars!
Silly and obstructive.
White balance completely out of wack. Too bad, could have been a great set.
I didn't get the boots either. Other than going along with the color motif, they are out of place in this setting, as are the dried flowers.
As my physics prof used to say "Why? Be pacific!" (Helps the photographer next time to generate images more to your liking.) ;-)
Oh, I am quite sure that, when doing a closeup on the pussy where the face is also visible, then the artist has to choose which of the two to focus on.
However, if the photographer pulls back and shows the entire model, her body as well as her pussy and her face, as in the sequence I referenced, it seems to me (not being a photography expert in any way, shape or form) there are many such shots where both the pussy and the face are in focus. (: I would like to see more of those shots than closeups, personally. (:
Monday, September 5th, 2016 on Narosy
I agree totally. There's a nice feeling of whimsy here, and a lovely feeling that this is exactly what Mango loves to do ~ to be naked out in nature and in sun.
All the same, she has definitely shot better with other artists and while this set was very nice ~ I am already anticipating her next, rather than eagerly returning to this one.
Monday, September 5th, 2016 on Agros
Yes she has a beautiful bottom that was unseen save for one shot and that is a pity as she has one of the best. A few less sequenced shots and more varieties of pose and angles would have shown her for what she is much better, a sensational model 8)
Sunday, September 4th, 2016 on Hanie
Thursday, August 25th, 2016 on Ogeta
I think the shoot would have been better myself w/o the tulips
I was more noting that high scores seem to correlate to that - not really to comment on the correctness or otherwise of that.
That said, there does appear to by a myth that men don't like large labia and that appears to be incorrect, looking at scores on this site for sure.
Look at the high scores /comments - they do seem to soar with more explicit pictures.
A sense of whimsy now and then is a good thing. ANATT is not necessarily the be-all and end-all to this site.
Saturday, June 25th, 2016 on Follise
Lovely buttocks lovers unite! Lovely buttocks are my favorite part(s) of the female form............Mmmm- Lovely buttocks.......................................
exactly, i thought this was her PRESENTING set because i didnt remember the 1st one. even though this technically isnt FIRST SIGHT, im definitely in love!
Well, to be fair, half the set was shot in too-bright light, IMHO.
Picture Lover, if you pay attention to The Seller's comments, one thing that will emerge over time is how often he uses irony, particularly dry irony...
By the look of things I did not express myself correctly.I did not mean the data displayed was correct.
I meant statistics have to be accurate and correctly displayed,otherwise there´s no point in using them.
Have you heard of a mistake?The Seller
Hi gentlemen – as noted, the stats were incorrect – simply an error converting metric to imperial! They have been rectified now. She's a tiny little thing :-)
I strongly agree!
Sunday, May 1st, 2016 on Presenting Lily Sands
Well... it depends on what are you going to introduce and where
Saturday, April 30th, 2016 on Presenting Lily Sands
Okay, I admit it, that made me laugh. :)
I must strongly disagree, gentleman the romantic effect Paromov was seeking is handled very well,wit the exception of the light reflecting from the gilded chair in a very few pics
I could have chosen a dozen others. I particularly like her expression in this one. It seems to me to be an "in between poses" shot that turned out just right. Model and Photographer clearly enjoyed the creative process in this set, and for me that is so much more important than poses that display magnified gynecological detail lit by multiple flash heads, floods and reflectors.
Friday, March 18th, 2016 on Presenting Sofi Shane
But it's most definitely not "bad photography". It's okay to say you don't like it, but that's a style judgment. What she does, she does quite well.
Thank for an intelligent,well thought about comment.What I think is this.When a model does not show an open pussy and things are a bit hidden they get zero.Even if the the model is a combination of of the most beautiful models in the world she would get a big fat ZERO.This site is about beauty not just vacant pussy and that's why Iam a member.
Zelda is the jewel
Set's not meant to be presented as "explicit". Natasha Schon's been "around the block" quite a few times and has developed her own technical style. Some like it, you obviously don't care for it. Just remember, not every set has to be a "BAM ... in your face" kind of thing.
Dead camels not available, use necromongers instead. Take us to the threshold!
Oh c'mon, Picture Lover... haven't you ever been with a girl ~ of any age ~ in a meadow full of flowers? What's the first thing they do? They pick a bunch of the flowers and weave a crown for themselves, and then for you if they like you! ( :
This is simply reflective of what girls like to do, IMO. And yes, I seriously thought they added a bunch of beauty to this set. If you don't like them... there's PLENTY of Izabel sets with zero flowers in them, all you have to do is click on her name and go to her homepage and select another set. ( : She currently has 18 sets so you have plenty of non-flower sets to pick from! ( :
Many, many member requests, Picture Lover...
Wednesday, July 8th, 2015 on Stalosi
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.