There are plenty of great shots, but my my, isn't #72 a delightful invitation? (or should I say invitations?)
Sunday, March 26th, 2017 on Cennia
What a doll, too bad a date with these girls is an impossibility. I'd be thrilled, but will be satisfied with the honor of seeing amazing bodies like Hilary, and undressed- what a treat!
Thank you Alex for the panty shots and the upskirt shots- they were an exciting prelude of things to come. Too few of those shots in most other sets, so I'm grateful. And then, of course, things got even better...
Monday, March 20th, 2017 on Kenati
Funny, so much comment on hairy vs shaved, which leaves other factors out. Such as:
-So many of the shots, Zavya looks bored or worse. #41 for example. She's not into it.
-Very poor technical quality to the photography; contrast problems and focus problems. : (
-But, you've got some zingers, such as #92- my my, what an invitation!
Friday, March 17th, 2017 on Etherna
Nothing better than a lovely woman getting wet. So, what happened to the juices we see in #29? By #39 she is still obviously wet but somebody seems to have lapped up the spillage. Hmm, makes sense, I would offer to do that in a heartbeat! : )
Friday, March 17th, 2017 on Lasari
Agree with the comments so far. Bathing sets have never really been my fav, but Alisabelle could change my mind about pretty much everything. To have her in my lair, I'd even put up with lousy music or anything that would normally be annoying. She's that hot.
Thursday, March 16th, 2017 on Beticy
That's because you should have had an orgasm by #68! : )
Wednesday, March 15th, 2017 on Wilena
I admit to being one of those crass subscribers who really loves the explicit close-ups that are so often derided by the art purists. Not that I don't pay attention to aesthetics, especially the photography and lighting (my career at one time) but it's true that in my lust I often bypass some of the subtleties of the model and set.
But in the case of Juliett, my heart-strings are pulled mightily by wondering "what if she was my date?" or "imagine if she was my girlfriend?" I'd be amongst the happiest men on earth I think! I'd probably get into trouble for not accomplishing a darn thing, 'cause I'd always want to be in bed with my sweetie.
Can't get enough of Juliett, the more the better!
Monday, March 13th, 2017 on Modeta
Don't agree, her slim figure is outstanding. FWIW, you should have used "too" instead of to.
I admit to being one of those crass subscribers who actually loves the explicit close-ups that are so often derided by the art purists. Not that I don't pay attention to aesthetics, especially the photography and lighting (my career at one time) but it's true that in my lust I often bypass what it would be like to actually be with the model.
But in the case of Juliett, my heart-strings are pulled mightily by wondering "what if she was my date?" or "imagine if she was my girlfriend?" I'd be amongst the happiest men on earth I think! I'd probably get into trouble for not accomplishing a darn thing, 'cause I'd always want to be in bed with my sweetie.
Can't get enough of Juliett, the more the better!
Monday, March 13th, 2017 on Terena
Most amazing labia on the planet. Imagine being embraced by them.... oh my goodness!
Sunday, March 12th, 2017 on Alardy
Right, who wouldn't?
Katie A has one of the most perfect bodies I've ever seen. Ideal to my mind. Oh, and the "endless series of genitalia shots" that wabos tires of would be just fine with me!
Monday, March 6th, 2017 on Ratha
Not up to Rylsky standards
Thursday, March 2nd, 2017 on Hunie
Alisabelle looks a bit chilly in #69, I would be thrilled to warm her up! (In fact coincidentally, 69 would be a great start to warming her up... mmmm)
She is gorgeous in every way, cute and sexy as can be. And that pussy... oh my gosh, it's as close to perfection as one could get.
Hoping to see a LOT more of her. A bedroom scene next time?
Friday, February 17th, 2017 on Presenting Alisabelle
Benjy, YOU can have the sandwich, I'll take Alisabelle just the way she is!
I am constantly harping about skin tones, and now we seem to have agreement. This used to be my field, what you have here are green/cyan skin tones with a weird tonal compression (in other words, the contrast sucks).
Agreed, Lily is an amazing new talent, but Monsieur Lightfoot should be in charge of finding models, not doing the photography.
One plus for me was #8. I've been saying for awhile that good panty shots from the front are mysteriously missing from most of these sets.
Thursday, February 16th, 2017 on Presenting Sydney Wolf
I agree. Terrible lighting, and often the focus is soft. Pretty girl, get rid of the photographer!
Tuesday, February 14th, 2017 on Sanei
I wonder if "hue" was what you really are referring to? Hue is a color cast, which I'm not seeing (full sRGB color space). What I do notice is that the set starts out with some nice directional lighting, but then goes pretty flat once she's on the bed. Also would be nice if 12 megapixel cameras were all updated to 20 or 21. The HIGH res is not much different than MEDIUM.
Friday, February 10th, 2017 on Dexide
Sorry to be so dense, but I don't get what you mean?
Friday, February 10th, 2017 on Aldice
I love "wide-open" as much as anybody (see Casanova's comment) but not every set has that. Model's choice I'm guessing, but the photographer is either into that or not as well. Still, Adele is worth a look, don't you think? The pushed-together lips and legs in #99 are an interesting perspective I don't often see. Certainly entices me to go in for a taste.... in my dreams.
Friday, February 10th, 2017 on Weuva
Candice has a body any man would die for. Well, ok maybe die is going too far, but you get my point.
Normally outdoor sets are not my fav, but this set is excellent. Hat off once again to Leonardo.
The only thing that would have made it better would be if Candice were getting wet (as in lubrication, not going for a swim!) That happening is probably less likely outdoors.
Agreed, photography is definitely amateurish.
Gloia is cute and sexy, it's too bad.
Thursday, February 9th, 2017 on Presenting Gloia
I agree. It's up to 8.28 now, but should be higher. Maybe points could be deducted because of the less-than-stellar focus in some of the shots. Alex must have been distracted by something, who can guess what it might be?
Dgil does give us lucky viewers some cause for excitement, that's for sure! And while I'm usually fond of shaved, in this case I agree that leaving lovely ginger hairs is the best decision. In fact, I'd let it grow out a bit more, so the color is more noticeable.
Monday, February 6th, 2017 on Dejni
No complaints at all about Valeria, she is sexy as can be, great body. I will need to explore and see if there are better sets of her.
As for the photography, I am not impressed. Backlighting can be good, but there's so much lens flare that the contrast is shot. Doesn't seem Charles used much if any fill light, so we are left with flat lighting, no color saturation, no directional light for dimensionality, all in all pretty dismal from a technical standpoint. Maybe he should stick to doing videos?
Saturday, February 4th, 2017 on Nalidu
Right, the "cover" shot is more green/cyan as compared to the other thumbs. Not a huge difference, but noticeable. I was NOT aware that M/A runs the sets through processing software, I wonder what the purpose of that is. As a professional (retired actually) photographer, it would be interesting to talk with the image processing people there. Would that be Rose?
Sometimes I'm appalled at the color shifts and overall technical quality issues I see in the sets, and other times I'm genuinely impressed at the care to detail I see. Oh, and then there's the model, that's a big topic, but now I'm just addressing the photographer's part in things. So I always blame or praise the photographer for the technicals. It didn't occur to me that M/A has a hand in it. If so, there should be more consistency. (???)
In this case Emily makes up for everything, but I seem to be in the minority who notices the technical aspects of these sets.
Saturday, January 28th, 2017 on Zelyne
The yellow-green tint of the forest is understandable, but Flora should have color-corrected so Kira's lovely skin was not also yellow-green. Deduct points for flawed technicals.
Kira, on the other hand is outstanding! Would love to see more of her, perhaps with a different photographer?
Friday, January 27th, 2017 on Presenting Kira
I think you mean OVERexposed, as in too much light. That isn't really the case, the lighting is really "flat", meaning there's very little direction, hence no 3D feeling of shape. Low contrast flat lighting is pretty uninspiring, right? (This is my field, I know of what I speak)
If you look at the tiles behind her, you can see reflections of Erik's lights. It looks like he blasted a single strobe into a large reflector, near the camera position. What you get is ugly lighting... : (
But Emily is NEVER ugly, and thankfully there are some keepers. After all, you gotta be grateful for an invitation like #109! My goodness!
Friday, January 27th, 2017 on Zelyne
Agreed. She has done some sets with Arkisi, and they are vastly superior in my humble opinion.
As I've said before, it's best when the models work with more than one photographer.
Thursday, January 26th, 2017 on Fotira
I'm glad everyone seems to have enjoyed this set so much. Some of you even saying it makes the day a "grandslam". Hmm, I have to say I was underwhelmed.
First, what a strange location, it looks like a foyer to some building. Odd. Then the lighting is abysmal, not at all what Leonardo is capable of. And, I guess my fascination with girl/girl sets is dwindling over the years. If I was there, I'm not at all sure I'd be allowed to join in the fun, so there goes the fantasy effect.
But, it seems I'm in the minority. And with 4 sets a day, I'm sure I'll find something that hits my buttons more than this one.
Wednesday, January 25th, 2017 on Candys
True, all warm tones except for the balls. Of course, ONE main sepia/warm tone that predominates is Emma's skin, which I'm quite happy to be smothered by.
Tuesday, January 24th, 2017 on Azua
She is stunningly beautiful to be sure, and yes cute as can be. (BTW I think she DOES have some makeup on, but not much) Some of those poses are heart-stoppers to be sure!
Just treated myself to a 32" 4K monitor. Not that MetArt was my reason for buying it, but OMG the high-res images and the videos both take on a new dimension now. Just what I need- more incentive to look at MetArt! lol
Sunday, January 22nd, 2017 on Megaen
Right, I wonder if the photographer feels it's disrespectful to focus on a girls intimate bits instead of her face? Never mind that she has her legs spread wide open, just leave that blurry.
I just don't understand...
Saturday, January 21st, 2017 on Kenada
I complained yesterday about Leonardo submitting so many shot with out of focus pussy, and said I expected more of him. Well, today my faith in Leonardo is back; maybe this is a newer set.
Anyway, Genevieve certainly was a wonderful start to my day. I was hoping for something to cheer about, and Genevieve certainly fit the bill today. Thanks to model and photographer for an erotic jolt!
Saturday, January 21st, 2017 on Nediza
Totally agree! How can you take poses like %53, #54 or #58 and leave her pussy out of focus? C'mon Leonardo, it's not so difficult to shoot one focused on her face (which is lovely) and follow it with the focus on her amazing labia.
I expect better from Leonardo.
Friday, January 20th, 2017 on Kenada
Ya gotta love it when a lovely model like Iva has creamy juices oozing out of her vagina. Yum!
Thursday, January 19th, 2017 on Mediasa
So I take it you love the work of Albert Varin? It is a nice photography job, but I really prefer when models work with more than just one photographer. You see different aspects of the model, the fresh interpretation is a good thing in my opinion.
I absolutely love a lithe female, and Yani is super cute to top things off. Oh, and seductive. Sex with her would be a dream come true. But I'll have to settle for a peek, for which I'm grateful.
Monday, January 16th, 2017 on Maeta
Right? 53 and 54 left me breathless
Serena is stunningly erotic, what a delight!
Arkisi does his usual stellar job with the photography and posing. Only exception is that I don't "get" the pose where arms are crossed as in #98. What's that supposed to be for? Oh well, what's between the hands is what counts, but it just seems like a silly pose.
My goodness, when Arkisi says "bend over", he really gets a nice result!
Sunday, January 8th, 2017 on Jateen
*sigh* I'd pay a King's Ransom to pop one of her luscious nipples into my mouth
come to think of it, just about anything of hers in my mouth would be divine...
Thursday, January 5th, 2017 on Clocen
Hence the low score.
Saturday, December 31st, 2016 on Roderi
You, my friend, have the job we would all love to have. I actually spent 25 years of my life as a professional photographer, yet never shot naked women in my work; did corporate work. Oh well, I got to travel the world getting paid to shoot, but I still envy photographers like you who shoot arguably the most beautiful women on earth, and with their clothes off, no less! My hat is off to you for being able to work the equipment with such enticing treasures before your eyes!
Lily C brightened my Christmas to be sure. And fine work from Mr. Helios. Bravo to both!
Sunday, December 25th, 2016 on Lecioti
Merry Christmas to my "family" of fellow admirers of beautiful women who share their naked treasures with us. We have at least that much in common.
Malinda is a joy to see, so glad women like Malinda enhance our world by sharing her body with us. Yes, she's paid, but clearly the girls have fun most of the time. And apparently they get excited sometimes too!
Nice location, I'd love to put a blanket down and have private "play time" with Malinda. I do think it would have been nice to focus a bit more on her substantial labia, what a wonder of nature they are! And I have to wonder about shots like #129 where the focus is on her knuckles, leaving her gorgeous pussy a bit out of focus. What on earth was Marlene thinking?
Sunday, December 25th, 2016 on Nyella
That is very funny, but I know exactly what you mean! : )
Sunday, December 18th, 2016 on Orija
I get pretty fired up when I see wet and open as in #39 and #40. What a treat, and my guess is so tasty as well. Kenya is so pretty and erotic, and as mentioned, Arkisi is a master of his craft.
I can't help notice that the only difference between #122 and #123 is that her lips are parted. Can I have that job? Of course, it would be nearly impossible to not get my tongue involved in the process.
Friday, December 16th, 2016 on Dothy
My guess is the low score is mostly due to those who dislike pubic hair. I'd trim it a bit, but frankly a sweet pussy is gorgeous in all it's presentations. I happen to think super thin is really exciting (such a dog, I'm imagining what a snug fit she must be!) but I think the poor lighting takes the whole thing down a notch or two.
But still, there are some shots here that definitely float my boat! Welcome Zavya!
Wednesday, December 14th, 2016 on Presenting Zavya
I think Kalisy is stunning, but I don't get all the accolades for Alex Lynn. C'mon, so many shots wasted on pistachio nuts, you've got to be kidding. Focus on the plate of nuts and let Kalisy be blurry? Aaargh. : (
Monday, December 12th, 2016 on Debasa
Agreed, the rating should be much higher. My advise is to give little if any attention to the ratings, it's often random or baffling in my opinion. My guess would be that some rate according to how explicit the shots are, so could be a reflection of the "got me off" factor. Not saying that's great, but it's my theory.
Monday, December 12th, 2016 on Tenioca
I noticed that too. Normally I'm a pussy guy, but something about the position of her anus just begs to be entered. I'd gladly do the deed!
Tuesday, December 6th, 2016 on Ameta
We all have our preferences, but it's not as black or white as you make it out to be. When spreading her legs, a woman's smile could be thought of as an invitation, and the smile is because she's happy with the idea of what you're going to do to her, NOT mocking "is that all you got" as you suggest. Geez, why see it that way?
BTW, correct spelling is damn, FWIW.
Wednesday, November 23rd, 2016 on Porrea
I actually LIKE the fact that the panties were on for some shots in the beginning. Panty tease is fun fun fun!
Just her face & eyes in #131 are captivating enough. Undressed, she knocks my socks off!
One quibble: I would think that on a photo-shoot day, you'd be freshly shaven or waxed or whatever she does down there. I have nothing against hair, but it just seems like natural, neatly trimmed or freshly shaved would be how I'd show up for a nude photo shoot. Just sayin'...
Monday, November 21st, 2016 on Amroy
It's been a good couple of days on MA. The Nancy A set blew me away, and now Vivian has me throbbing (I know, TMI).
Anyway, it's sets like this that make me glad I went for a lifetime membership here. Most days there's at least one mind-blowing set. This one certainly qualifies, kudos to Vivian and Matiss.
Saturday, November 19th, 2016 on Ragtha
"pretend she's *mine*
not mind, ha ha
Wednesday, November 16th, 2016 on Harra
Xena is the kind of stunning beauty that I lament I never had in bed with me, so it's (sort of) fun to pretend she's mind, but also a bit frustrating.
As mentioned, the revealing close-ups are missing, which is a shame, that level of erotic kick is part of why I'm here.
This goes in the FWIW catagory, but it seems Xena uses a tanning booth or tans in the sun (or both). My guess is her skin is lighter, which I personally would prefer. Just go to Florida and see what a lifetime of sun does to women, and you'll want to encourage Xena to back off on the tanning.
I am not one of those art purists who cringes at close-up pussy shots, in fact #58 is a stunning study of Sade's incredible female anatomy. But, I really think it would have been better without all the oil.
Instead of fantasizing about sex with her, I'm reminded that I'm viewing a contrived situation, jolting me out of the horny frenzy I'd rather be in.
Tuesday, November 15th, 2016 on Denso
Adel certainly exemplifies erotic beauty, she gets my heart pounding for sure.
I'm so happy to see that nobody suggested she needs a cheeseburger or ten. I love her lithe body, and she is such a nice contrast to the obesity we in the US have way too much of.
I could quibble about the focus in a few shots, but if Adel were naked in front of me, I'd probably have immense problems concentrating on the photography!
Sunday, November 13th, 2016 on Anido
Agree, the camel-toe effect was stunningly beautiful.
I'm surprised to see only 8.37, I think she's super sexy.
Oh well, the ratings are kinda weird sometimes.
Friday, November 11th, 2016 on Tosada
Suzanna is certainly a marvel of the world, it's a privelege to see her undressed. Of course, I'd like more of her than I can get looking at pictures, but hey it's still fun to look.
With her amazing vaginal secretions in #64, I would think Fabrice would focus more on that, wonder why not? Too crass, too explicit? Not for me, seeing juices makes me want to taste her.
Thursday, November 3rd, 2016 on Rodna
I am late to the party (working too much!) but I agree with all the wows, this set simply rocks! Thank you Berenice and Luca, very well done!
Friday, October 21st, 2016 on Drise
You would call it erotic if what? Her in flannel pajamas? How could a gorgeous naked woman NOT be erotic?
Thursday, October 20th, 2016 on Presenting Calli
I'll be the lone dissenter here today. No argument that Nika has a dynamite body, it's pretty much what I would die for... except then I couldn't play and taste her. The set is technically perfect, Arkisi is a master with lighting. Poses good, all checks... but to me there's an erotic excitement that's missing. She is clearly in a photo shoot, looking perfect, but doesn't have that "ready for sex" arousal that makes other sets so exciting.
Still, I'm not really complaining, just sayin'....
Friday, October 14th, 2016 on Thertis
I am always delighted when I see there's a set by Catherine. She and I seem to have similar tastes in women. And her lighting is top-notch!
I have ranted for some time about how few panty shots we get taken from the front. Arkisi for example will shoot a half dozen panty views but ALL from behind (mind you, I love that view as well!) So thank you Catherine for #9, a tantalizing tease of what might be under the sheer panties.
Then apparently I'm a sucker for a woman's vagina to be open a bit, I guess it has to do with me wanting to get IN there (the dog that I am) so, not surprisingly I appreciate the view in #68. I often hear complaints about the too explicit "crotch shots" but I happen to love them, and when things open up like that, I'm in heaven.
Tuesday, October 11th, 2016 on Eihna
Well, having been a professional photographer for most of my life, it's hard for me to get past technical flaws. I respect your opinion that Alex has the edge in eroticism, but the actual photography has so many problems that I'd really wish someone as stunning as Adel would work with someone better. The Nudero comment was only relative; I was not at all knocked out by his work, but there were fewer technical glitches.
Tuesday, October 11th, 2016 on Kiosona
Her poem might apply more to American men. They run the gamut of course, but we even consider the worst of the lot for highest office!
Such a shame. Adel is just my type; I love long slender legs and hers are just what I crave. Follow them to heavenly pink and I'm a happy guy. But Alex just is not up to the task. All his shots have lens flare, which ruins the contrast, he has seriously poor judgement as to where the focus should be, and the list goes on. Nudero has done better sets with her, but I'd really like to see her branch out and work with better photographers.
Monday, October 10th, 2016 on Kiosona
But then there are shots like 117 where the focus point makes no sense. Her face isn't really visible, yet that's where he focuses. Clearly the action is somewhere else, but alas, it's blurry. :(
Because there are those subscribers who LIKE crotch shots. Not rocket science.
Friday, October 7th, 2016 on Nidea
How is it possible that Ukraine has so many of the most incredible women on the planet? And Juliett Lea is a prime example. She's gorgeous from head to toe, and then inbetween the most perfectly moist pink pussy. OMG, whoever gets to sleep with her is blessed!
Sunday, October 2nd, 2016 on Dalett
Niemira is so sexy, a date with her would be a dream come true.
As usual, we have a nice panty shot from behind (#9) but nothing similar from the front. Why is that always the case?
So many times a model has her hands in a position suggesting she spreading her bits open, but nothing is happening. Thank you for #127, where her hand is actually doing something that benefits us all.
Friday, September 23rd, 2016 on Tesoma
Wet pussy? I agree her pussy is spectacular, but I'm not seeing much wetness in this set. Not complaining, mind you...
Thursday, September 22nd, 2016 on Zaella
Indeed, #12 and #14 definitely started revving up my motor!
As mentioned before, I think Leonardo's work is getting better and better.
The landing strip look is not my fav (even though I'm a pilot!) but that thought got blown away by shots like #43 and #80. My oh my, it is exciting to see inside a wee bit. : )
Oh, and the rest of her is not so bad either, lol.
Thursday, September 22nd, 2016 on Onishel
Agreed, but why are panty shots almost always from behind? Seems to me things look pretty good from the front too!
Thursday, September 22nd, 2016 on Twenia
Great erotic photography stimulates the desired effect for sure! Hillary is the bomb, what a hottie!
My only wish would be some natural moisture and the parting of those lovely labia. That would nudge things from 10 to 10+ in my book.
Wednesday, September 21st, 2016 on Twenia
Same! I've said many times, panties can be really exciting. When you are on a date and you get to her panties, you know good times are coming. Like Pavlov's dog.... pant, pant!
Thursday, September 15th, 2016 on Rovuer
I can't fault Nika's body in any way- it is perfection, heaven on earth. And Arkisi is masterful as always. Yet something here is not as stimulating as it seems it should be. Perhaps it's that Nika's pussy, as perfect as it is, seems to be dry as a bone. I always wonder if the photographer gets "lucky" and my guess here is that Nika is all business; a hot model but it seems she doesn't get aroused in the process.
Wednesday, September 14th, 2016 on Calathe
Late to the party here (busy day) but I'm really surprised that this set only got 8.54, there is so much to get fired up about here. First we see a "real" woman, not a porn star, then a little panty play- yay! I'd prefer feminine lace, but still I think panties are erotic, you wonder what lovely moist bits are underneath. And lovely and moist they are! Her lips open up to reveal warm and wet, what more could you ask for?
I get the comments about her lack of smiles, but honestly the other elements made it a strong set in my book.
Sunday, September 11th, 2016 on Sonerue
Firstly, the praise for Pandora B is highly justified, she is simply stunning in every way. Even down to the little hairs on her thigh.
I think this set exemplifies my assertion that Leonardo is getting better and better as time goes on. He is now, in my humble opinion, getting to the ranks of masters like Arkisi and Rylsky. The lighting on this set was impeccable, with the very minor exception of #93, which suffers from lens flare.
How I would love to be the lucky soul who got to part Pandora's labia in the 37 to 39 shots. Everyone on the set would end up angry with me, since I'd be unable to resist putting those gorgeous wings in my mouth!
Sunday, September 4th, 2016 on Narosy
Cherish is awesome, a 10 for sure!
Did anybody else notice that the contrast/tonality seems a bit off? Especially in the beginning, there is just something about the levels that's off. In this day of Lightroom and Photoshop, no excuse for that.
But whatever, I would dearly love to ravish Cherish, so all is well.
Sunday, August 7th, 2016 on Ladrima
I'm often critical of Leo's work, but have no complaints at all with this set. Photography, lighting, hot poses, and Barbara enticing me to imagine some intimate time with her... kinda what MA is supposed to be, right?
Sunday, August 7th, 2016 on Divery
Forgot to mention (speaking of my two cents..) that I really wish models as stunning as Nordica would work with more than one photographer. Slastyonoff does a fine job, but we would all benefit from the different approach of other photographers. Besides, more and more shots of Nordica would be most welcome!
Tuesday, August 2nd, 2016 on Poua
A few thoughts:
1.) If I died and got into heaven (not likely), a fitting welcome would be a girl as lovely and sexy as Nordica!
2.) Thank you for the panty close-ups, as in #59
3.) The butterfly theme actually starts with #84. Some lucky soul got to part her lips a bit. Pity she doesn't complete the process with her fingers parting them even more; as if to welcome you in!
4.) The tulips are fine in concept, but they ruin some of the shots when they get in the way, such as #45 and #74
My two cents, as we say in the States. But the bottom line is I feel fortunate to have seen Nordica in the nude- what a treat!
I understand saying you'd like to see other framing, but don't disparage close-ups, they are so much fun for many of us!
Yes, but not enough fronal pictures. And if she were to rub her labia a bit, the cotton folding into her crotch would reveal an enticing "camel toe", which can be very exciting. But I have suggested this to Leonardo (and others) before. It seems they are not listening.
Sunday, July 31st, 2016 on Semio
MA is in the business of erotic fantasy. The thing about cotton panites is that if you went on a date with Clarice, and you were lucky enough to be passionately undressing her, cotton panties might be what you find. Adds to the "girl next door" appeal. How many of us actually date porn stars? Some of the slutty garb worn in other sets would be in that catagory; not a BAD thing, but just a different kind of fantasy.
I'm assuming that SOME of you, like me, try to imagine having sex with these amazing models, like Clarice. If so, some of us find panties of ALL sorts to be exciting, because in real life, you get to the panties on the way to nirvana. And hopefully they are soaking wet. :)
Should be higher rating than 8.83, so I hit 10, and it goes down to 8.82
Go figure! :(
Friday, July 29th, 2016 on Plectia
Totally agree. I can't imagine a more enticing behind shot than #58. What a perfect bottom she has!
Friday, July 29th, 2016 on Imillah
Judging by all the accolades here, I would think I'm in the minority, since it's a nice set yet I'm now wowed like everyone else seems to be. But then, 8.38 for an Arkisi shoot is pretty low, so maybe there are those who are not commenting that are more like me.
I would absolutely LOVE to be the one who applies the oil, but honestly I don't find it that erotic in this set. Each to his own I guess, glad so many people like it.
Monday, July 25th, 2016 on Rinaja
Part of the allure is the excitement of them coming off! We get so hung up on how these girls are photographed that I think what gets lost is the concept of imagining YOU get to have sex with this girl. In which case, there would be a point in time (probably) when you are making out passionately, and she is still squirming in her panties. You look down and imagine what's underneath, with the anticipation that you get to get in there eventually. The panties might even get soaked before they come off, how fun it that?
I wish Albert had shot some frontal panty shots, I find that fits well with my fantasy that I get laid by this gorgeous woman.
So Five O, that's the best explanation of the allure I can come up with. If none of what I described resonates for you, then scroll straight to the pussy shots, that's not so bad either!
Wednesday, July 20th, 2016 on Madulty
First I was blown away by her breasts- you just don't see such magnificence every day! Then Erro starts to concentrate on her fabulous pussy, OMG. If these pictures don't make you yearn to get inside, I don't know what will!
Tuesday, July 19th, 2016 on Tondo
Since I love pussy bald, trimmed or natural, I will not comment on that. But since I'm always complaining about no frontal panty shots, I felt it's only fair that I praise Antonio for #10 and #11- thank you!
Sometimes the imagination is more powerful than reality, and when I see that precious feminine mound covered up by a thin veneer of underwear, my imagination goes wild! :)
Tuesday, July 19th, 2016 on Lekaten
Agree, the whole series 117-125 gives us some unusual views. Highly erotic in my humble opinion, makes me want to ravish her impeccable body!
Thursday, June 9th, 2016 on Sarvie
As stated elsewhere, here we have a classic Arkisi photo session. Super hot Gloria, posed artfully and erotically (is that a word?), plus Arkisi's impeccable command of lighting, and there you have it- perfect erotic photography.
All that's missing is the touch of her skin. Wouldn't THAT be a treat?
Wednesday, June 8th, 2016 on Nobasa
Well it's been said before, Amelie's eyes are so captivating, it's tempting to forgive any foibles in the photography. I personally would have liked more pussy close-ups but it would make sense to not do that with Amelie because her face is so appealing.
I hear this complaint often here about "overexposure" or "washed out" as if the photographer was so distracted by the model that he/she didn't pay attention to exposure. Granted, that may be possible, but just so you all know, "high-key" is a style, it's not neccesarily a mistake. If you want to get technical, look at her white top, there is detail there in the highlights, so strictly speaking, the shots are not oversexposed.
Another thing I noticed is the color balance changes quite a bit from beginning to end. Starts out ok, but by the end it's shifted to blue/cyan, not the best hue for women's skin. Probably the light changed during the photo shoot, but this is easily corrected in Photoshop.
Friday, June 3rd, 2016 on Laluce
Oh right, the panties! I am always complaining that panties don't get shown off enough (especially the front!) so I was very happy to be teased by Marit's panties. I too would prefer a different style, to me a sheer with lace would be feminine and perfect for Marit, but of course I wasn't invited to the photo shoot.
Anyway, thank you Rylsky for letting us savor her in her panties before she pulls them aside and then off.
Wednesday, June 1st, 2016 on Presenting Marit
Just Marit's face alone would give me wet dreams, wow what a gorgeous beauty. I happen to like pale skin on light sets, each to his own. I don't understand the low-ish score. To me, she's a 10+++!
haha, this is funny- "never really been a fan of full on nudes", yet you subscribe to MetArt. Well ok then, my guess is you're seeing WAY too much, but suffering through it, huh?
Good that you've made an exception for Nika N. I can see why!
Saturday, May 7th, 2016 on Vateco
Victoriya is so cute, I'd give anything to play with her in bed. Hair or no hair down there, I don't care, I'll bet she's FUN. Those who dislike pubic hair should just move on, it's not very often you guys have to "suffer." The fact that she is getting wet makes it even better.
Technical note: the shots just don't seem to be very sharp. I wonder if packing 24 megapixels onto a chip requires some design compromises? Or maybe the lighting was a bit flat, so the softness is an illusion. (?)
Wednesday, May 4th, 2016 on Oraria
Yes, I'm guessing she tastes as sweet as candy. She can savor the chocolate, I'll savor her pussy. :)
Friday, April 29th, 2016 on Jfloy
Stunning exposé of Gracie's perfect body. And the playfulness of #9 is just so much fun! Alas, we never get to take her to the bedroom, where we could complete the fantasy that she's MINE and I get to savor every bit of her.
Still, a great set with impeccable lighting and tonal values (nice when photographers pay attention to the technical details as well as the erotic details!)
Monday, April 25th, 2016 on Raque
MORE of Juliett please, she is divine!
Note to Albert Varin: since the lighting is a bit dim, it would help greatly to run these through Photoshop and adjust the levels. On the positive side, thank you for having her "open up" in #82 and #84- so wet and inviting! :)
Monday, April 25th, 2016 on Presenting Juliett Lea
hotte, what the heck are you talking about? Your comment is as clear as mud. "Same old boring ass pics"? WTF? Yeah, guess it's true we MetArt viewers are infatuated by pictures... and your point is what? Why else would we be looking?
Monday, April 25th, 2016 on Mesiro
"Blurry"?? Not sure what makes you say that. I will say, as a photographer myself, there is a strange quality to the tonality, or the contrast or something. Can't quite put my finger on it, but it makes her tasty bits look less appealing. Maybe it's just the bluish color balance; a bit of yellow would help. But "blurry shitty" makes no sense.
Oh, and BTW, Carmen is spectacular, can't complain about her at all.
Friday, April 22nd, 2016 on Celtria
As many have said before me, Nensi is a dream come true, from head to toe. But I think Paromov doesn't do the best job photographically. Technical quality is low. He should donate some of his 36 megapixels to Arkisi, who shoots 12 megapixels. Could we average them out?
Wednesday, April 20th, 2016 on Foncara
But then why can't Leonardo do both? I'm not saying I ignore the face, I'm just saying mix it up for those of us who find a full-body shot with her pussy in focus to be exciting. Seems to me the pose suggests that what's between her legs is important enough to have at least one shot focusing there.
Friday, April 15th, 2016 on Lanisma
Have to concur with Seadogg about Isabella, she knocks my socks off. But I don't agree with 10+++ for Leonardo. As mentioned, his lighting is excellent, I'll give him that. And he finds models to die for, so a tick in the plus column. BUT he consistently does shots like #93, #74 or #55 where her pussy is out of focus, and it seems he NEVER will focus down there unless it's a close up. This is wrong, a gorgeous model is spreading her legs for the camera, and every single time he will focus on the face, and that's it, he won't vary from that. I wish he would listen.
Thursday, April 14th, 2016 on Lanisma
Yep, I'll pass as well. Each to his own. I just find it interesting when a woman who has a perfectly good vagina that's made for sex, but still finds anal such a turn-on. I've actually noticed women who's orgasms are stronger when they're getting it in the bum. But who am I to complain? But they DON'T have to return "the favor!"
Sunday, April 10th, 2016 on Lostya
I wasn't aware that kids today view the anus as the "new vagina." Amazing what you learn online!
My experience is that while not universal, a surprising number of women are excited by at least anal stimulation, if not anal intercourse (assuming you're not too big!) I've heard quite a few men tell me that when dating, they're finding women wanting anal sex more than the guy is comfortable with. Personally, if it turns a woman on, who am I to deny her the pleasure? ;)
And getting back to the photo sets, yes they are often both right there in the pictures. Take your pick of what to concentrate your gaze on. I happen to think it's all good!
Saturday, April 9th, 2016 on Lostya
I think Charmane is lovely and highly erotic. And I totally agree about the creamy lubrication! I don't know how anybody could see that and then say the set was not erotic. Sometimes the comments baffle me...
Thursday, April 7th, 2016 on Inesale
What? Can't believe you say that, I found plenty of lovely bits that were in focus and quite sharp. Maybe all the jerking motion is blurring your vision?
Wednesday, April 6th, 2016 on Falene
Oh, I didn't know that. Thanks, I need to pay more attention to these things, but somehow get distracted by the actual pictures.
I will keep harping on this, seems the idea of comments is to let the creators of the art know what the consumers like.
Monday, April 4th, 2016 on Loceni
I just roasted Koenart for not taking any frontal shots with the panties on. Then I see that Catherine "gets it", maybe it takes a woman to appreciate all the erotic potential of a woman!
Why is it that when the panty shots are taken, we always get rear shots like #26, but very rarely panty shots of the front? (I'm not just picking on Koenart, this seems universal). Look at the panties in #2 where her lovely lips are bulging out a bit. Erotic potential lost if you don't take advantage of frontal views.... in my humble opinion.
Monday, April 4th, 2016 on Larsey
Her eyes are hypnotizing to be sure. Her dark hair and those striking blue eyes are truly amazing.
Her gorgeous butt is to be admired as well, doesn't get much better. Now, if only her labia could be teased apart just a bit, my heart would sing!
Wednesday, March 30th, 2016 on Leasy
Ah, nothing like a good panty tease to get things going! (#18 and 20 hint at lovely things to come!) I wish there was more of this- more frontal views revealing camel toe would be great.
Emma and Albert knocked this one out of the park- very nice set!
Thursday, March 24th, 2016 on Incaro
An incredible model, unfortunately the lighting and overall photographic quality was rather poor. Still a beautiful sight to behold, but could have been a lot better.
Friday, March 18th, 2016 on Kajani
Another example of a 10+ stunning model that really should branch out and work with a different photographer.
Friday, March 18th, 2016 on Sorala
I totally agree Ambre is hot hot hot, on fire, all that. But really, we have NO idea if she is a redhead or not. I admit to being a snob (natural redhead) but c'mon, this color out of a bottle is interesting, but she really cannot be called a redhead.
Sunday, March 13th, 2016 on Shinova
"a firm favorite of mine"...
...so to speak!
Friday, March 11th, 2016 on Piery
Patritcy is so cute, she's off the charts. I looked at #4 and thought "what if you had a date with her, and she came to the door in that dress?" I would certainly think I'm the luckiest person alive. I wonder if there were a bidding war to have a date with her, what astronomical sum it would fetch? Even without any guarantee of sex, my guess is it could be quite a fundraiser for her favorite charity.
Can't help but mention that #26 and #27 are among the most exciting titty shots I've seen in quite some time! But I do agree with defsville71 that Koenart falls short when it comes to seeing her pussy. The few that exist are marred by lens flare (low contrast is the result) & not the best lighting on those rare shots showing her downstairs bits. :(
Sunday, March 6th, 2016 on Pogie
Couple of thoughts- the pink panties are indeed "show" panties, something very feminine a woman would put on to excite her man (or maybe woman?). As such, I find them sexy and fun. More frontal shots, and some shots pulling them aside would be nice. But they would make more sense in a bedroom, not this tropical outdoor set.
Cira has the most amazingly enticing little compact pussy, OMG I'm guessing quite a snug fit would await the lucky person who gets to play with her.
Saturday, March 5th, 2016 on Tyosa
I have to admit, when Ledina's juices appear in shots like #53 and #71, it just pushes me over the top (in a GOOD way!)
Makes me grateful that I get to witness such amazing beauty in women such as Ledina, and appreciate her incredible sexiness, even if it is remotely. (In other words, if I could "have" her in person, what a dream come true that would be!)
Saturday, March 5th, 2016 on Dilanoa
Fabrice has not been on my list of top photographers, but this set puts him on the map IMHO. Solid photography, very nice job.
Caralyn is super sexy, what more can I say?
Friday, March 4th, 2016 on Chitane
Repetitive shots, yes. Conservative poses? For the most part, yes. *sigh* Not that Antonio does bad sets, I mean really, how could one complain about Lupita undressed? But here we have yet another dynamite Ukrainian model who only has sets from ONE photographer. Pity, I'd love to see some of the other talented photographers do a set with Lupita. She is the bomb!
Thursday, March 3rd, 2016 on Saveru
Judging by the sheer number of comments, it's obvious that we viewers are totally blown away by Daniel's debut. Surprised the rating isn't over 9.
Saturday, February 27th, 2016 on Presenting Daniel Sea
Nice set, gorgeous model. Open and wet will boost the rating every time; too bad the trend starting with #44 didn't continue. Oh well, happy to have seen her in an excited state. (and of course would love to experience that in person!)
Friday, February 26th, 2016 on Ribaus
It's not haze, it's called lens flare. Imagine all the elements in a modern zoom lens, and when you shoot into the sun, light bounces all over the place, reducing contrast and saturation. Pity, because Nika N is really hot!
Wednesday, February 24th, 2016 on Quanda
Photographers DO have a particular style, but I guess it helps to encourage them to try new things. Arkisi and Rylsky do manage to find an incredible variety of models, it's true. I've found that Catherine usually puts her models at ease, so usually her sets feel comfortable, like your with a date, not just viewing a model. (This set, maybe less so) But you do see themes with all of them. Arkisi for example is a butt guy I think. He will sometimes feature a girl's anus more than one would expect. (No complaints, just an observation) Catherine has her style too, and while it's worth asking her to mix it up more, I'm certainly not complaining overall, I think she's quite good.
One thing about this set: if you look closely at the "catch lights" (reflections) in her eyes, you'll see that it's basically one big soft box on the model, then another light for the background. The result is kinda "flat" lighting. I've seen better lighting from Catherine. (BTW, Arkisi get the prize for the best lighting, he knows lighting!)
Wednesday, February 24th, 2016 on Presenting Charmane
The low score is mystifying, my guess is it's because there are no explicit pussy shots. I happen to like those too (guess I'm just a dog!) but in this case, the upskirt and panty shots are so excellent, that I think it's a great set, even without the explicit shots.
Agree with Rose, it's nice that SOME photographers are listening.
Wednesday, February 24th, 2016 on Birdon
Agreed, but if Catherine DID do more explicit in addition to what you call erotic and seductive, I for one would NOT complain!
Wednesday, February 24th, 2016 on Literna
I was thinking the same thing. My high school years were in a Southern California beach town, and long blonde hair was the thing back then. I would have been drooling over Xena. Hey wait a minute, not much has changed- I still AM drooling over her! :)
Tuesday, February 23rd, 2016 on Literna
Agreed, a woman's behind doesn't get much better than this!
Arkisi is either making poor focus decisions, or editing poorly. Either #28 or #29 should have shown her gorgeous butt in focus. Then in #112 and #113, she is making a special effort to open up her pussy, and Arkisi chooses to have it out of focus? I expect more/better from arguably one of MetArt's finest photographers. :(
Monday, February 22nd, 2016 on Semila
In addition to what Rose said, your writing is so poor that I honestly don't understand what it is you are saying, or what your gripe is. If English is not your first language, then my apologies are in order. If not, then proof read before you submit.
Having gotten that out of the way, yes this is a great set, Dido A. is stunning. I don't really see how it's radically different from what we normally see, so I don't get your distinction between this set and others. And what MetArt USED to be might not be relevant to a majority of subscribers.
Sunday, February 21st, 2016 on Niuse
Geez, kinda hostile, aren't we?
Excuse me for having some sexual energy around these photographs!
Friday, February 19th, 2016 on Grimas
Not only is she super-cute and seductive/erotic at the same time, but oh my gosh, those pussy lips are so full and kissable, they just call out to me!
Friday, February 19th, 2016 on Noclia
Probably because within a confined area he knows exactly what the lighting will do, and the precise exposure. Not saying he shouldn't try to push past that, but I've been there and know the safety of where you've tested the lighting...
I always look forward to Catherine sets, because she picks such lovely models, then puts them at ease, and it shows. Oh, and maybe some electricity in the air, since Cherish and others seem to be getting moist.
In her eyes, I notice one huge softbox light pretty close to the camera, so the result is pretty flat lighting. A nice hairlight above and behind would help as well.
Still, Cherish steals my heart and gets it racing, so all is well.
Wednesday, February 17th, 2016 on Presenting Cherish
Between #49 and #50, somebody carefully spread her labia wings. Maybe she did it herself, but if not, I'd certainly apply for that job!
And I agree, she has a fabulous behind. Wet dreams indeed!
Tuesday, February 16th, 2016 on Cilato
They do look like wings, don't they? With the right aerodynamic shape, one could take flight with those lips. I know that I would certainly take flight if I was feasting upon them!
Notice the low-ish score. Alex Lynn does nice outdoor work, but the poses are in general pretty tame. With such a stunningly hot body, I'd like to see Kalisy get a bit more erotic. I think the score would skyrocket, because her body is to die for.
As I've said, it's frustrating when a hot model chooses to limit herself to one photographer. I'd love to see Arkisi or Rylsky or Catherine work with Kalisy.
Monday, February 15th, 2016 on Neferti
I couldn't agree more. The good news is Paromov shoots with a 36MP camera, so you can at least savor them in ultra detail. (I wish Arkisi had the same setup, his 12MP could use an upgrade!)
Friday, February 12th, 2016 on Totena
Like everyone else, I am smitten by Janah. I know I'm safe saying that we all want MORE of this gorgeous woman. Her tits have to be the most ideal size and shape of any I can think of. Just beyond perfection!
The only thing I would wish for is her labia to open up a bit to let us "in" so to speak.
A solid set: dynamite model, great lighting, sexy poses. Nice job to all involved.
Thursday, February 11th, 2016 on Presenting Janah
Beautiful sexy model, nice lighting, erotic poses, so all is well, right?
Well, almost. Leonardo, more than the other photographers will insist on doing shots like #91 and #93 where she is spreading her legs for the camera, only to capture the moment with her kitty way out of focus. Not that her face isn't lovely, but c'mon, she is posing that way for a reason.
Putting that aside, Angel gets my heart racing, so in the end I can't complain.
Tuesday, February 9th, 2016 on Adiena
Yes I agree she's a redhead, but the roots coming in are way less vivid color than the rest, so she is augmenting her hair color. Being a redhead myself, I notice it more.
Tuesday, February 9th, 2016 on Desaer
Well she may be a ginger, but the red is definitely augmented, so not so natural. But I would not kick her out of bed, she has ample assets to indulge in!
Monday, February 8th, 2016 on Desaer
Both her upstairs lips and her downstairs lips would be heaven to taste!
Monday, February 8th, 2016 on Ramoe
As mentioned before, it's unfortunate when a gorgeous model is only photographed by one photographer. Matiss does a fine job with outdoor shoots, but stays frustratingly distanced from anything remotely pornographic. I guess some models prefer his tame approach to nude photography, but I for one would love to see Honey Liz work with someone else for a change.
Saturday, February 6th, 2016 on Netera
#49 and #52 were pretty exciting; helps that she's getting wet.
Varin photo shoots are rather tame, I think he wants to stay away from what might be thought of as porn. Still, there are some shots here that get the blood flowing in the right places.
Friday, February 5th, 2016 on Rettan
Maybe the lack of comments had to do with the viewers being too busy doing.... uh, some other activity. That would make sense to me! :)
As if her eyes and smile weren't enough, she has a body to die for. Not surprisingly, Arkisi does a stunning job with lighting and poses. 10+
She would be a dream come true for me, but I will have to settle for fantasizing from afar.
Saturday, January 30th, 2016 on Olimade
It's nice to know I'm not alone. Who knows if our dialog will influence these photo shoots in any way??
Thursday, January 28th, 2016 on Tailes
A bit of something for everyone in this set. (Surprised to see complaints about posing) Onorin is sexy and very alluring, lighting is very good, and I liked the poses.
BTW my hat is off to Albert Varin for the frontal panty shots (#51 and #54) which most photographers ignore. I doubt my bringing this up has resulted in Albert shooting those shots, but I happen to think it's very exciting to see what's coming peeking through her panties.
What a tight little package Katie's body is. I yearn and lust for such treasures, but in real life she'd probably overload my circuits! (But I'd risk it, ha ha) Looks like Katie goes out of her way to tan her skin, which in the long run won't be a good thing, but for now we get to drool at her perfection.
It's no wonder Arkisi sets consistently score over 9. Impeccable lighting is his trademark, along with hot sexy poses. Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to get back to my Katie A fantasy!
Wednesday, January 27th, 2016 on Soltia
What necklace? What background? Oh right- I was too busy looking at Katie's private bits I guess...
At the risk of sounding too crass, I would give an eye tooth to have sex with Nalina. Her trim and fit body would be a dream come true for me. *sigh* It will have to reside in the Land of Fantasy in my mind!
Tuesday, January 26th, 2016 on Presenting Nalina
No I still have the monoblock Impact 41s and they are going strong. Same for the newer (but still ancient) S80s. Seems to me Broncolor gear is built to last, so maybe you just got a bad production run.
Interesting that nobody had anything to say on this. I'd agree it's the model that really matters, but the technical stuff shouldn't be ignored.
Tuesday, January 26th, 2016 on Zallia
Delightful set. Evita has the most seductive facial expressions. Leaves me breathless, then the poses get more erotic. Finally, we are treated to seeing her getting wet- that is such a treat.
On the technical side, my impression is that many of Rylsky's sets have a cool hue (as in blue and cyan tones), whereas I prefer a woman's skin to have warmer tones. (Which would explain why I chose Broncolor strobes, which have a gold coating on the Xenon tubes) A personal preference, and there's always Photoshop to easily change the color temperature.
Monday, January 25th, 2016 on Zallia
Don't know where you are from Gary, but I suspect it's an Eastern European aethetic. Maybe the farther away you live, the goofier it looks. To this Californian all the giant jewlery seems absurd, but I just try to ignore it because the girls themselves are so hot.
Sunday, January 24th, 2016 on Yresoni
I agree Violet has that girl-next-door appeal. (I should be so lucky!) I notice our sweetheart was getting a bit wet down there, wish that had been showcased more, but still a very fine set- beautiful model, good poses and excellent lighting.
Tuesday, January 5th, 2016 on Poransa
FDAU? I thought I knew all the acronyms...
Lighting is unusual, coming from a very low angle. It gives this set a dramatic look.
Vanda B is lovely, so sexy in every way.
Catherine, I've got to ask about #52 and #53. When a model is in a pose like that, why would you focus on the face? Could you at least do shots with alternate focus points? Just sayin'...
Monday, January 4th, 2016 on Radalla
Well, it's color out of a bottle, so anybody could have it. Natural redheads are rare, now THAT would be something to celebrate.
Still, she has a very cute face and a gorgeous pussy...
Wednesday, December 30th, 2015 on Kealle
Leila is stunning, how I love a lovely lady with a slender body. She would be a dream come true in person, no doubt.
A couple of photography suggestions:
- Panties are sexy; how about a shot like #28 with the panties on?
- Please be more mindful of focus point in shots like #44- to focus above the clitoris leaves the majority of her lovely pussy out of focus- not ideal at all, in fact quite frustrating.
Lighting and poses are top-notch.
Friday, December 18th, 2015 on Lautha
The only thing I don't like about this set is that Angelika D is NOT my girlfriend! :(
Thursday, December 17th, 2015 on Beries
Zarina has such a killer body, and sweet eyes & smile to make it even better!
Arkisi does a fine job here, plenty of 10+ shots, but I do have to mention that many shots exhibit a warm-color background, making the cyan-bluish light on her skin a bit off-putting. In general, a woman's skin looks best in "warm" light. The cyan cast on her is not a plus. (Maybe window light? I can't imagine your strobes are that blue)
But having said that, I got very excited looking at these pictures, and that's what MetArt is all about!
Thursday, December 17th, 2015 on Dattora
Dita V is looking fine, what a stunning body she has!
I notice that Leonardo's lighting is getting better and better, and overall the photogrpahy on this set is outstanding.
Friday, December 11th, 2015 on Adveni
Isn't Matiss the photographer?
Thursday, December 10th, 2015 on Foina
Well, suffice to say, I am in love. I can't imagine any woman having qualities that suit me better than Xena. Of course I have no idea what she's like in person, but I'd be willing to take my chances!
Xena, you are perfection. Catherine, excellent job capturing her in all her splendor.
10+ in my book.
Wednesday, December 9th, 2015 on Inira
I disagree, to me it's impeccably lit.
No question, Night A has a killer body. And that butt with the freckles is to die for. I'd give an eye tooth just to hump her rump!
As hot as she is, the set doesn't stand out as one of her or Arkisi's better efforts. I wish her kitty would moisten up a bit and then maybe those lovely lips would open up.
Oh yeah, and I agree, an enticing smile would be nice.
Monday, December 7th, 2015 on Salica
Saturday, December 5th, 2015 on Calima
Stunning news! :)
Wednesday, December 2nd, 2015 on Jinata
So much has been said about Emily, it's hard to add anything. I don't get the comment about looking like a plastic doll; I think her pale skin maybe what he was seeing, not Arkisi's lighting- which I think is excellent.
Such a cute face, innocent looking but obviously she could rock your world. And then she has to have one of the most inviting pussies I've ever seen. Can you imagine how much seed has been spilled on account of her modeling career?
Monday, November 30th, 2015 on Inreca
My 'o my, what a perfect body, gorgeous face, sexy attitude and... well it's all been said here. And Arkisi with his masterful lighting, makes it all come to life for our enjoyment and excitement.
I don't think anything compares to natural wetness to make the photo shoot go over the top in terms of arousal potential. It's like she's ready and willing to have hot sex. Oh, do I wish it could be me!
Sunday, November 29th, 2015 on Nerbi
I agree that Izabel is a 10, how could you get any cuter, or ask for a more enticing body?
Not that Matiss does a BAD job, but she really needs to work with different photographers to do justice to her beauty. Matiss will MAYBE do a close-up once in a hundred shots, which is a shame.
So, nice set because she is so hot, but c'mon, lets see this beauty with a different style of photography.
Monday, November 23rd, 2015 on Arcoy
I keep inviting them to San Francisco, but no takers yet! Hey, if they are stuck in Kiev, then I'd sure like to be there too. :)
But I'm dreaming, they must have all the attention they can handle already
Wednesday, November 18th, 2015 on Presenting Ambre
Yet another knock-out from Ukraine. Makes me want to buy a flat in Kiev and pretend I'm a hip young guy. I'd probably still have to go to MetArt for my thrills. *sigh*
And thrills are what Ambre brings to us. Love her slender frame, perfect tits and pussy, a very sweet package indeed.
Love the feminine sexy panties. More of shots like #15 and #70 would be appreciated. Getting a peek through the front is VERY exciting!
Agree!!! And those nodules she has poking out- I happen to know that they feel REALLY good, a nice bonus for the lucky guy who gets her.
Tuesday, November 17th, 2015 on Tebira
I agree with the va-va-voom of Violla, but calling her a redhead is not exactly accurate. But no matter, she has plenty to get excited about!
Not buying into it, but thanks for the invitation. If those are your favorite shots, there's no need to subscribe to a site featuring nude women. Just sayin'.
Sunday, November 8th, 2015 on Remonia
Not only is Nola smoking hot, but this set just reaffirms my belief that Arkisi is one of the best in the business. Kudos to both, sure got MY motor revving!
Sunday, November 8th, 2015 on Encera
I don't agree, but it's pretty easy to do yourself if you're so inclined.
I actually feel sorry for Bored1. I have noticed his negativity before & commented that his handle is perfect. If you can be bored seeing girls like Nika with their clothes off, I would think you'd find another pasttime. Pity the poor chump who wrote this.
Friday, November 6th, 2015 on Presenting Nika Lace
I see the complaints about complaints (lol) so this will start by saying I love the set, Veselin brightened my day and overall very nice photo shoot.
I just wanted to ask Albert and the other photographers who place the models hands in a position suggesting she is pulling her pussy open (see #63), when in fact the hands are just there for placement, nothing else? I find it sort of annoying (and a bit disappointing), and I just wonder why it is used so much? I get that some models are not willing to "open up" so graphically, which is fine, but the pose suggests that, so it seems sort of phony.
Wednesday, October 21st, 2015 on Fijesa
Agreed. Maybe up the testosterone levels? ;)
Easily the best set I've seen from Deltagamma. Vanessa does seem like in real life she must be a sweetheart. At the same time, if I were lucky enough, my guess is she could combine her sweetness with lusty naughtiness.
Nice work, both of you did a fine job!
Tuesday, October 20th, 2015 on Mirida
I was loving the set and loving Sigrid, and then starting with #79 she "opened up" and that just took my breath away! I wonder what was going on to get her so wet and open?
Why did I do industrial photography when I could have been doing hot girls like Sigrid? Oh well, this is what makes MetArt so addicting- sets like this.
Thursday, October 15th, 2015 on Lastila
I wonder if Arkisi is saying he is the feudal lord, and therefore has some privileges? Gad, I can't even stand to think he gets to play with all his models. The jealousy factor would be overwhelming!
Tuesday, October 13th, 2015 on Moiles
The closer you get, the more shallow the depth of field becomes. So it is a technical issue. Now 41-43 is a choice, some of those shots should have been focused "down under". But with the super close ups, a common focal point is the clitoris, and I believe some shots should focus on her vaginal opening. Just sayin'...
But having said all that, Arkisi is one of the best when it comes to lighting, super hot poses, and so I have to say that I have little to complain about and much to admire.
Monday, October 12th, 2015 on Moiles
So do we!
Given where it ended up, I do wonder if it's HER moisture from inside or maybe someone else's moisture?
Barbara gets a 10 from me, but the limited tonal range, milky shadows and odd color balance reminds me of my old film days. Hard to believe this was shot recently with modern equipment. Maybe that "film" look was intentional? (Can't imagine why?) Looks like pushed Ektachrome to me.
But back to what's important... Barbara is lovely and very very sexy. More of her with better technicals would be great!
Monday, October 12th, 2015 on Presenting Barbara Vie
First of all, the cuteness and hot sexuality together make Patritcy one of my all time favorites. My passport is ready, ha ha, wish I could take things to the next level- dream on!
I agree with hipshot, frame after frame of blurry pussy is inexcusable. We all agree her face and smile are to die for, but the photographers have to remember to pay attention to what the model is doing. If she is spreading her legs wide open, SOME of the full-body shots should be focused there, not just rely on the close-ups.
Lastly, I love the playfulness of #84. I get a sense of how much fun it would be to be Patritcy's lover. *sigh*, I wish!!!
Saturday, October 3rd, 2015 on Faniell
I was going to say something similar. At the risk of being even MORE crude, I don't think I've ever seen an asshole that looked as tight & snug as I'm sure her's is. You can just tell by looking at it!
I looked at everything else too, and found nothing but wonderful feminine beauty to lust after.
As usual, Arkisi does a stellar job with lighting and poses. Very hot!!!
Friday, October 2nd, 2015 on Missen
I agree 100%
Thursday, October 1st, 2015 on Lajine
Nicolina is indeed a star, the kind of girl I wish I had met when I was younger. So this is perfect fantasy material. (dream on, dude!)
It's odd to me when I notice pussy juices in one shot, then it's gone in the next. Maybe somebody couldn't stand it and licked it away? That would be an ideal job, I have my passport ready! :)
I do wish Nicolina would pose for different photographers. Fabrice does a nice job, but there is no downside to featuring a model with different styles of shooting.
Thursday, October 1st, 2015 on Deirth
Lots of chatter & comments here. Great set, Jeff gets me fired up for sure. Funny, I didn't even notice the heels, I wonder where I could have been looking? There are guys who live for heels, I'm not one of them, and they don't look all that great to me. Each to his own...
A couple of comments for Rylsky:
1. Color balance is a bit too cool for me. I get that the set has cool hues, but overall too much blue/cyan.
2. When she allows us to see her entrance in #72, my heart can barely take it. More of that please!
Thursday, October 1st, 2015 on Weten
I'm surprised to see the rating at 8.37, seems too low to me. These pictures certainly got MY engine revving! The old fashioned underwear were kinda fun, but glad they didn't stay on too long. The pussy framing with pearls has never been a technique I like much, and here it's just annoying IMHO.
But in the end, Milla is super hot and sexy, and Helios did a very nice job with lighting and poses.
On #14, the rug in front of her toes would be the focus point. Pretty bad, but I have to admit- if a naked Aislin was in front of me posing like that, I'd have some moments where there would clearly not be any blood left for my brain!
Wednesday, September 30th, 2015 on Bonti
I agree, I don't consider myself overly focused on tits, but not only is 13 inviting, but how about #98- #100? Wow, I'm a believer!
Of course I love the nude photos, and all the naughty thoughts you'd expect me to have viewing them. But that's no surprise, is it?
What might be surprising is how much I enjoyed the close-ups of her face, like #23 and #27. Oh my, if I could wake up to that face and those eyes, I'd know I was in heaven!
Tuesday, September 15th, 2015 on Olesa
Your work is top-notch, bravo Catherine!
And thank you for the joy you bring to so many.
Zsanett has the most amazing labia I've ever seen. It would be heaven if they could open up in one of these photoshoots. I might have heart failure, but that's OK.
I think Arkisi is among the best, that's why I also get Eternal Desire. But I have to say, this is not one of Arkisi's better efforts.
Monday, September 14th, 2015 on Ehani
I am probably in the minority in thinking that those "landing strips" look ridiculous, but since EVERYTHING else about her is so damn sexy and enticing, I will happily ignore it.
Wow, hot stuff!
Thursday, September 10th, 2015 on Porida
Hmmm, I'm not sure where he is going to find a higher standard of photography. I'm pretty fussy, having spent 25 years shooting as a pro- not girls, but I know a thing or two about lighting. MetArt has the highest overall quality I've come across, and I do roast the photographers when I think they deserve it. But where in the world are you going to find such lovely girls with better photography? If Thripilingweasel find it, hope he gets the word to us, I'd like to see for myself.
Thinking you meant "drool", lol
Tuesday, September 8th, 2015 on Sacay
Curious why you chose to ask that in the comment section for Caprice? You didn't like this set? Why not? Your question raises other questions.
I think this set is very nice. Caprice is hot and I think Erro did a really nice job with the photography. One thing I noticed is in the close-ups, where focus is critical, Erro does a better job than most.
So be more specific. Are you missing the "art" theme (ie., you are one of those who thinks MetArt has become vulgar?) or you think the quality of the photography has gone down, or you are weary of gorgeous Ukrainian women? :)
Finally, a photographer who understands the excitment and eroticism of upskirt and teasing us with her panties. And when they do come off, it was well worth the build-up, Michaela's body is magnificent.
Thursday, September 3rd, 2015 on Sonare
This is purely a matter of taste (no pun intended)- those who love the theme concept are enjoying this. The rest of us are wishing we could savor Kira's body without all the mess. I'm in that camp, this doesn't do a thing for me.
Wednesday, September 2nd, 2015 on Pagina
Me too! I have a feeling there are quite a few in the queue ahead of us... :(
Monday, August 31st, 2015 on Bolete
Are those tears because you can't have her, or bodily fluids because she's so hot?
The close-ups do indeed get the heart racing! I think I detect some feminine lubrication, I'd be happy to slip my finger inside to find out for sure.
Speaking of close-ups, the 21 megapixels make for some amazing detail at high rez, I'd worship every molecule if I could. But it reminds me that Arkisi only shoots 12 MP, and Rylsky 14 MP. I'm guessing they have some lame argument that the lower pixel density has advantages, but looking at Ron's 21 MP, I certainly can't see any downside!
Anyway, Roberta is one of the best, and Ron did a great job with her.
Monday, August 31st, 2015 on Sentila
I'm late to the party here (West Coast of USA) and you have all pretty much said it. Aislin has always been a favorite, and the way her pussy lubricates during these shoots is a HUGE turn-on. Perfect face, perfect body- if the goal is to ache wanting to have sex with her, it has worked flawlessly.
Arkisi is indeed the master of lighting, and this set shows off his talents more than most. I know this business, he is really good!
Sets like this will keep me hopelessly addicted to MA.
Sunday, August 30th, 2015 on Bolete
Leila sets my heart racing, what a wonderful addition to my day!
Thank you Flora for #6. Frontal panty shots are sorely lacking in the MA world, don't understand why. Even more exploration & different angles would be even more welcome. Then of course, the panties come off- yay!
Another suggestion... in shots like #92 and #93, the clitoris is not the only spot of interest in that heavenly zone. Could you try different focus points, since depth of field is so shallow in close-ups?
Wednesday, August 26th, 2015 on Qestra
I have always much preferred the "girl next door" look to the porn star look. Nicolina epitomizes the cute girl next door that you'd love to play with. Gets my fantasies going, that's for sure. She is gorgeous, what a doll!
Tuesday, August 25th, 2015 on Dibare
Just that one? Hmmm, I guess my lascivious trigger gets set off rather easily!
Tuesday, August 25th, 2015 on Livuda
I really love the juxtaposition of front and back in #85. Having just come from TLE, it's nice to see properly exposed, clear shots of such an enchanting beauty like Izabel. Great stuff, sets like this are why MA is at the top.
(I'd like to see her luscious labia opened up, but hey I'm not complaining, just wishing.)
Monday, August 24th, 2015 on Arcoy
In the MetArt catalog, she only seems to shoot with Helios and Erro. I think Erro does a better job, but I would love it if she would branch out and shoot with other photographers.
Beautiful everything, yes. But it's hard not to zoom in on those labia, truly a rare display of beauty. (Quite possibly 3 standard deviations from the mean.)
I would love to be present when those lips are parted, THAT would be a special treat!
Tuesday, August 18th, 2015 on Arova
Nice lighting and poses from Dubrovsky, he knows his stuff. Jasmine gives us a delightful debut. Hard to imagine why the negative comments? Oh well, we all have varied tastes, I guess. (??)
Sunday, August 16th, 2015 on Presenting Jasmina
Thank you, Albert for #33 and #34, we don't see many frontal shots with such cute little feminine panties. I happen to think that's an incredible sexy turn-on, getting me fired up for what comes next. I wish such shots weren't so rare.
Tuesday, August 11th, 2015 on Dimue
Agreed, but it's a shame Leonardo didn't do a better job with the focus. :(
Monday, August 10th, 2015 on Ormina
It's just sunlight streaming in through the window. But I do agree with the complaints about focus problems, and I also notice blur from camera movement. Pity, because Yani is to die for (I'd give a proverbial eye tooth!)
What on earth do you mean by "pubes in such amounts"?
Maybe you should be reading the newspaper or something...
LOL, she will knock on your door, but she has to come to my place first! Hope you don't mind sloppy seconds. :)
Friday, August 7th, 2015 on Panoe
I also enjoy the beginning shots on the street and in the café. Lets me imagine being with her in real life. Fantasy!
The really intimate pussy shots are missing, but my guess is model and photographer just shoot what feels comfortable on that day, and I'm fine with that. It just makes me yearn for more of Ledina another day.
Overall, very nice set. Super cute model with an amazingly hot body, and Catherine does a fine job with lighting and posing.
Wednesday, August 5th, 2015 on Sinala
Love Adagio, it would be heaven on earth to take her to bed.
The lighting is a bit flat for my taste. A move towards the Arkisi-style directional lighting would help.
I do take special interest in the pussy shots (I know, big surprise!) and of note was #60, where her wonderfully feminine pink gown frames her to perfection in this unusual angle. Then I couldn't help but notice in #100 that some tantalizing juices are starting to bubble out. Too bad we just get a tease with that, but I'm not complaining at all, it just makes me want to see more of lovely Adagio.
Tuesday, August 4th, 2015 on Especi
Agree that more of Sivilla will be most welcome. Yes, that creamy white skin looks so soft and sensuous. And those tits are just to die for, yum.
I don't get the "super photographer matiss" comments. Not that Matiss did a poor job, but for variety I'd like to see Sivilla do some shoots with other photographers.
Tuesday, August 4th, 2015 on Presenting Sivilla
Where? First of all, there are very few pictures where you can SEE her lips, and I'm not seeing any juices. Either I need another cup of coffee, or you have an overactive imagination. :)
Read below, I did mention Arkisi...
Monday, August 3rd, 2015 on Restio
I am as keen on upskirt and panty shots as you can get, and my panning this set is not because the clothes don't come off fast enough. My gripe is that none of the shots really look like upskirts- she STARTS by spreading her legs, and you can barely tell that pink thing is a skirt. If the storyline is sexy coed in skimpy skirt, it should have started out less posed, giving us more of a voyeur thrill, THEN she can start flashing her panties and pulling off clothes in a passionate frenzy. This is, after all, fantasy!
So I say Milla is hot, but the photography could have been a lot better.
Monday, August 3rd, 2015 on Anjua
I'll add to the accolades, Lilit is an outstanding model, hot and sexy as can be. I can relate to the comment about her being "so beautiful it hurts".
Add to that, Arkisi's impeccable lighting, good sense of how to pose a model, and you have a killer set like this.
At the risk of offending the anti-gynecologist camp, it doesn't hurt that her vagina opens up the way it does, giving us a pretty hot visual of what you'd see just prior to insertion. That sure works for me! :)
Probably because Arkisi uses a 12 Mb camera. Since his work is some of the best there is, I do wish he'd go with a 21 or 22 Mb camera.
Hooray- finally some frontal panty shots. I understand the girl-next-door appeal of white cotton panties, but a bit sheer would have been even better.
Ethelle is dynamite, I hope to see a LOT more of her.
As for the photography, there were just too many focus problems and/or motion blur problems. In post-production, white balance and levels adjustment should have been done.
Friday, July 31st, 2015 on Presenting Ethelle
Getting a good look at the model's pussy is indeed an important factor in a MetArt set, but not the only one. I'm guessing the low score is a combination of no close-up pussy shots AND the feeling that we're seeing a lot of glitz and glamour at the expense of the girl herself. Then, as some noted, even those who like such costumes and gaudy sets found this to be a tad over-the-top.
Friday, July 31st, 2015 on Pyntura
Couple of comments- overall very hot, and Nika O is to die for!
As usual, the panty close-up is a rear view, never a front view. :(
I prefer it when a model does photoshoots with different photographers. Doing ALL sets with ONE photographer is limiting, should be discouraged.
Thursday, July 30th, 2015 on Elarte
Tirata is intoxicating. I dare say she'd keep me hard non-stop for weeks. Is it just me or is there something inviting about her anus? I'm normally a pussy addict, but hmmm, I think I'd want to poke both, thank you very much.
Thursday, July 30th, 2015 on Satmi
Not that I think this is a stellar set, but Serena would warm up any evening, and if all you see is blurry colours, perhaps you should lay off the martinis for awhile?
Thursday, July 30th, 2015 on Ditiso
Sienne gets my heart racing, and overall this is a nice set. Good job!
One quibble: having her IN a field of flowers is lovely. Draping the flowers ON her just gets in the way, in my humble opinion.
Monday, July 27th, 2015 on Idfay
Oops, I meant the series starting with #93 could use a bit more fill light...
Saturday, July 25th, 2015 on Foslia
Every once in awhile, I not only appreciate the model's erotic beauty and the exciting poses, but I just ache to actually experience that body. (OK, MORE than normal, since that pretty much always happens, lol)
There is just something about Roberta's body that I recognize as a "perfect fit", and when you get it, you know what I mean. *sigh*, I'll have to dream from afar.
Great job Ron! I would have used a bit more fill light on the series around #76, I like a bit more light on her labia. But I quibble, this is an outstanding set.
Necklace? What necklace? ;-)
Friday, July 24th, 2015 on Loesia
Hey Czech, a rant isn't necessarily a bad thing!
Friday, July 24th, 2015 on Atiza
Wow, you actually had an effect on one of the photographers? You should get a medal or something, that's amazing.
As you can see from the comments, some equate high contrast & hard light with crisp and clean. On occasion I like that, but usually the human female form looks better in softer light.
Friday, July 24th, 2015 on Jareti
Late to the party here (geez, what a busy hectic day- when's a man supposed to savor MetArt?)
I'm surprised Etna and Leonardo only managed an 8.40 on this set. I thought there were a lot of really hot pictures, seems better to me than the score would suggest.
Thursday, July 23rd, 2015 on Tenasin
If you ever want to know how many lights were used, where they were and their relative size, look at the catch-lights in the models eyes. Catch-lights are the reflections of the lights used. Well, a hair light above and behind the model won't be in her eyes, obviously, but the main lights will be.
Take a look at #51 for example. Just one light, that's it, and it's not very big, hence the "hard" high-contrast effect. I doubt it's a bare bulb (or xenon tube) but perhaps a small reflector for a spotlight effect. More common is to make the light source bigger, usually using an umbrella or "soft-box" to make the light come from many locations. It's like if the sun is hitting a big white wall, and somebody stands near the wall, you will get a stong directional quality from the light, but the shadows will have soft edges. This shoot is just the opposite- he's using one key light, with no fill. Sounds like the "look" is something a lot of MetArt viewers like!
Thursday, July 23rd, 2015 on Jareti
You are right, non-diffused light is essentially a point-source light, like the sun. So you get crisp hard shadows, that's how you can tell. Diffused light gives you a softer, more gradated edge. So yes, contrast is high, and gives you that "crisp and clear" look that you like. Arkisi does more directional lighting than the others too. When you say "washed out over lighted" you are probably seeing "flat" (non-directional, or straight-on light) which apparently you don't like very much.
It's a matter of preference. I like the Arkisi style, he's a master. I just thought this set looked a bit harsh. Personal preference. But now you have the technicals behind what you percieve.
Ardelia is a gem, all of us seem to be thrilled to see more of her!
I'm normally a fan of Arkisi, especially his lighting, but today's set is a bit harsh for my taste. Very hard light, look at the edge of the shadows. A bit of diffusion for the lights would show Ardelia better IMHO.
I know that Arkisi zoomed in for a close-up on #89, but why shoot #88 and NOT shift the focus for a second shot? Maybe Arkisi did, and it got edited out? Why?
Just my opinion, but I think Las Vegas is overrated. Even though it's close, I might pass if it was there. Harder to explain to gf why I'm going, too!
Wednesday, July 22nd, 2015 on Corna
Thank you for the technical reply, all of what you say makes sense. You have to work with the technicals, and inevitably compromises have to be made. It's sort of like designing an airplane- do you want speed, stability, room inside or what? As with photography, when you emphasize one feature, you have to give a bit on another.
Agreed, even if flawed, a good pose or a good expression is not to be wasted. Run it, and if you get criticism, so be it. It's not a perfect world, although I have to say that some of the models you find are pretty close to perfect!
Tuesday, July 21st, 2015 on Presenting Lucy Li
I'm in California, but I vote for Prague or Budapest as DeltaGamma suggests. I like to travel, and if the models are there, then I'm there! :)
Tuesday, July 21st, 2015 on Corna
Lauren is indeed lovely, those eyes are so captivating. Nice job by Deltagamma, who everyone seems to know is Davi. You've all met and I'm out of the loop? We should have a MetArt viewers convention in Kiev and meet each other and the models. (I'm half kidding, half serious)
Note to Arkisi and Rylsky: 22 megapixels can be a good thing. Case in point- Lauren's pussy begins to gap open, and Davi does not move in for close-ups. But in #131 at high resolution, the lovely details emerge. Not that I'm uninterested in the rest of her, ha ha.
No kidding, how about a field trip to Kiev? Ukraine is definitely on my radar because of MetArt.
So sad that the country has troubles with the Russians. Tell you what, all the Ukrainian women can come to California, and uhm, let's see, the men can go to Greenland, how's that?
Tuesday, July 21st, 2015 on Pinnato
You must be a statistician, swplf2. Hopefully you have time to savor the hot bodies!
Gorgeous eyes, perfect tits, the rest of her body is equally amazing, and then throw in the master Arkisi with skillful posing and expert photography, and you have a solid set. Well, the set is not the ONLY thing that's becoming solid!
Monday, July 20th, 2015 on Refoma
"Everyday bras and panties"- YES! Looking forward to that, I have been saying for some time that the eroticism of panties in particular has been neglected by Met Art photographers.
DG is it my aging eyes or is there a bit of softness to these shots? I'm wondering if maybe hand-held with slower shutter speeds is hurting sharpness? I'm aware that using a tripod for this kind of shoot is out of the question, but I wonder if bumping up the ISO so you can use faster shutter speeds would help with resolution? I found myself wondering just exactly where is the point of focus, and it was not always apparent.
Otherwise, great poses and Lucy Li is just indescribably exciting!
Sunday, July 19th, 2015 on Presenting Lucy Li
The peek-a-boo of #55 is delightful. I vote for a similar shot taken from the front.
Then, something about #81 grabs me. I would gladly take her in that position, in fact I'd be honored.
Then #99 shows off her musculature, which I think is very exciting. Suggests "tight" but then maybe my imagination is just overactive!
Friday, July 17th, 2015 on Salte
That face would melt any heart, what a doll! Looking forward to MUCH more of her. To steal a line from My Big Fat Greek Wedding, her pussy looks "dry as toast"- I'd love to be involved in changing that to "very wet", what a pleasure THAT would be!
Friday, July 17th, 2015 on Presenting Helena
Ha ha, very funny. Hopefully they are warm inside! :)
Friday, July 17th, 2015 on Cenyme
I "get" that some don't like the horse theme, but 7.47? Seems a bit harsh. I was thinking if Suzanna is in it, I'm happy- she is so hot! I do concede that the theme dictated some limitations on her poses, so knock it down for that, but this score seems too low.
Girls definitely ARE into horses. Go to a competition, and most of the riders are girls/women. They usually start as adolescents, I think there's some symbolism there for sure. Some nice shots of the horse here, but I guess I'll pass on sharing any of these pics with my daughter, lol!
Friday, July 17th, 2015 on Miosu
Leonardo, take note: when you use flash-fill outdoors, put at least an 81A warm-up filter over the flash unit you're using for the fill. It will balance better with your ambient light, which in this case is pretty warm. If you don't do this, you end up with the bluish cast most xenon tubes have.
BTW, theatrical gels work fine over the flash tube too, and they're much less expensive than gelatin filters.
Sounds like a deal! You'll find I'm not that regular, some days I'm so busy I don't even look at MA, and I'm a firm believer in lots of vacations, that's why I drop off the radar sometimes. But yeah, we can take turns ranting, lol!
Friday, July 17th, 2015 on Iteria
You will all be stunned that I would suggest this, but with such sexy and delicious panties, why not some poses a bit closer with her lovely bits showing through the sheer parts? It baffles me that pretty much ALL the photographers don't think of it. Sometimes they will do a shot of a model from behind with panties on, but extremely rare anything is shot from the front. I know, I'm starting to repeat myself ad nausaum just like he-who-must-not-be-named!
But having said my requisite panty rant, all is good here. Beautiful model, Adel C is so alluring it's almost painful (I want what I want says the narcissist!) I noticed #65 as well- who could resist that look on her face or the come-get-me pose?
Thursday, July 16th, 2015 on Iteria
I've got no idea who Dr. Ry is, but I guess I'll find out tomorrow.
Gee gswkJu, you speak of up-close to a vagina with such distain! How do you manage sex without getting close? Or do you avoid certain disgusting activities?
Wednesday, July 15th, 2015 on Ploide
I enjoyed this set very much. Starting out on the street was a fun intro, got my imagination going. Then inside and oo-la-la, it appears we're in for a treat. I'll say again, some close shots of her panties, front and behind views would have been a lot of fun. I don't understand how that gets missed by most of these photographers.
Ron defintiely knows his lighting; it is superb, up there with the best. I did make my own close-ups utilizing Ron's 21 megapixels, and I do wish other fine photographers like Arkisi would go from 12 to 21 or 22 MP.
Wednesday, July 15th, 2015 on Deitua
Yikes, if naked Layna is boring, what does it take to get you fired up?
Rozi appears to be the kind of girl I'd actually love to meet. Sadly, I'm enough older that she'd see me as a sweet old man, not a potential lover. *sigh* That's why I subscribe to MetArt!
There is a lot to like about this set, primarily because of lust to see more of her. I notice that her debut set was actually more explicit than this one, that's disappointing.
I'd love to see another photographer do a set with her in a bedroom setting.
Really? I totally get the accolades for Jessie, but in my humble opinion Balius could do better.
Tuesday, July 14th, 2015 on Ciara
Don't forget to mention the photographer's choice of where to focus. If he/she has to pick one or the other, why not do both? 90% of the time Balius will focus on the face and completely ignore the fact that the model's legs are spread wide open. Would it be considered impolite to look between her legs? If you do in this set, chances are it will be out of focus.
But thankfully, the gods (or somebody) chose to spread those lips apart in #95. For that, I am grateful.
I *think* I meant "he" but come to think of it, I'm not sure. Is Slastyonoff male or female?
Tuesday, July 14th, 2015 on Sodatu
This is indeed a fun and sexy set, thank you Michaela for sharing your lovely body with us!
Slastyonoff has never been on my radar before, but she sure hit one out of the ballpark today! Very nice job.
I love the dress and finally some panty play. It's about time!
First, I think more fun could have been had with the dress. Some upskirts would be nice, it just came off too fast.
Katherine is one of those 10+ hotties that I know I will never get into bed, so perfect fantasy here, I can pretend I got REALLY lucky. But as has been mentioned, she is a bit aloof, does not connect with the camera, and my guess is that she has been singled out as gorgeous her whole life, and it messes women up to be that stunningly attractive. It would not surprise me if she were a bit of a cold fish in real life, but hey- I'd take my chances with her. And meanwhile, drool over her amazingly hot body.
Monday, July 13th, 2015 on Santemi
"Storms in water glasses"- great phrase, haven't heard that one before! I too have struggled with how to word my lust for some of these women. It's not an inappropriate response to these pictures, but I guess defining "class" would be to tone it down from dirty bedroom talk- maybe in the heat of the moment Katia could appreciate such graphic language, but in a public context, not so much.
On a technical note, it's pretty tough when shooting with such strong backlighting not to get a fair amount of lens flare, which knocks down the contrast. Some nice directional fill light would help, Delta.
I hope they are not man-made, but rarely do you see such full lips on the face of a Caucasian woman. Hmmm, a graphic image involving her lips comes to mind, but I'd be going down the crude path, ha ha, so I'll stop...
Sunday, July 12th, 2015 on Taebe
Not at all, bikeman. I got fed up with the y-y rant re pubic hair, but I agree that a ginger bush on Mia would be a huge turn-on. And I usually prefer shaved.
About those see-through panties; they are HOT, why not feature them more? If K could pass that message along to the photographers, it would be great.
Sunday, July 12th, 2015 on Hinaja
You are absolutely correct. I'm in the photo business, I know. Arkisi is a master technically, and works very well with the models too, to get excellent sexy poses.
It's why I splurged to subscribe to Eternal Desire.
If he upgraded to a camera more than 12 MP I'd like that, but all in all I think Arkisi is one of the best. And the girls he finds, my oh my! :)
Sunday, July 12th, 2015 on Ranthy
Onorin clearly stole some hearts today. Safe to say we ALL want her back and want to see more of her delights.
Thank you for #16 and #19- as everyone knows by now, I think seeing female genitalia through sheer panties is über erotic- gets me fired up for seeing more.
Oh, and what a treat for her to share her vaginal juices in these shots; wow what a turn-on! Only wish I could taste them.
Friday, July 10th, 2015 on Presenting Onorin
Geez, I am sounding like a broken record á-la You-Know-Who, but with such sexy exciting and very feminine sheer panties, Erik does not think taking advantage of that is worth his or her time? I just don't get it. When you are having sex with a girl, just think about how exciting it is when you first see bra and panties and the lusty anticipation of slipping your hand in there? C'mon, Erik, this is fantasy- utilize the strengths. Red Fox is hot, and her lingerie had so much potential.
Friday, July 10th, 2015 on Acerdi
Nancy A and Arkisi, what a killer combination! Getting to see a stunner like Nancy undressed is such a treat, but then to see her invitation to come inside by opening up like that is heaven on earth.
I will repeat my request for more teasing with panties. Her cute little pussy peeking out from those lovely sheer pink panties is so hot! Go to high res and look at the panties in #14. I think a very powerful erotic opportunity is not being taken, and I do wish the message would get to the photograhers.
Friday, July 10th, 2015 on Dovett
You are one of only a handful of viewers who's looking below the knees vger. Too bad for you, but I do notice you get the occasional foot shot in some of the sets. The curse of being a small minority...
Friday, July 10th, 2015 on Lefasi
It's true that the top did not go with the panties, but thank you Matiss for #5, I happen to think the shape of a girl's mound under panties is very exciting, and imagining what's underneath is wonderful torture.
I agree, this is one of of Matiss' better sets. I do wish that starting with #84, her hand had *really* been pulling up more, it's sort of there for show mostly. Had her lovely pussy lips parted a bit more I'd have been eternally grateful.
Thursday, July 9th, 2015 on Necorsa
I often get frustrated with Leonardo, but I think this is one of his better sets. Lighting and poses are quite good, and honestly it's hard to go wrong when you have such beauty in front of you- Yani is to die for!
One quibble: #71 is the last close-up of the set, and that last part of the set provided some great opportunities for some heart-stopping close-ups. Yeah I know, with 39 megapixels I can make make "my own close-ups" but it's not the same quality as moving in close.
But all said, this set is a tasty treat! :)
Thursday, July 9th, 2015 on Tysna
Thanks _fer_realz, my sentiments exactly!
I know when you tell me, I'll say "oh yeah, duh!"- but what is FD/AU?
Thursday, July 9th, 2015 on Novega
In #85 it looks like she needs help getting a tongue to moisten her nipple. I would be most willing to assist, my dear.
On the other topic, I for one don't miss Doug/Yin-Yang, and yet I was quite sympathetic to his suggeestion of more variety than always shaved (I happen to like both.) But I felt he crossed the line many times, and was insulting to these models on numerous occasions. That was the reason for him to leave, being annoying or unpopular wouldn't have been enough. But I will grant you that going back and purging all his posts does seem a bit over the top.
Wednesday, July 8th, 2015 on Jeden
Easy to see why this set hit the 9.00 mark. Yes, those freckles are the bomb! Then those frilly feminine panties are so sexy and fun. I wish there had been more shots without the glass in the way- just her luscious mound and lips peeking through that frilly lace is so arousing, yum! I'm not a huge fan of yanking them up her slit, but when she pulls them to the side revealing her lips, I'm in heaven.
It's also no wonder that Rylsky is good enough to have his own site.
Wednesday, July 8th, 2015 on Esercsi
One can only hope, Dutchman!
I'm actually glad the water didn't come on; I think it detracts from the model. Wetness from HER, on the other hand, would be most welcome.
At first I was not all that knocked out by the set, but yes the panty shots were a big plus. And there are actually a few FRONTAL panty shots which are quite rare for reasons I don't understand.
Wednesday, July 8th, 2015 on Novega
I don't think Night is going for the "natural" look, DS. The "V" is not exactly a natural look either.
While neither the hair color nor the V float my boat, I'd be hard pressed to kick her out of bed! (pun intended)
Wednesday, July 8th, 2015 on Semyra
Tuesday, July 7th, 2015 on Sigoil
In high res it does look a bit like she was overzealous with the Unsharp Mask, doesn't it? I hasten to add, I'd happily that that "plastic, oversharpened mess" home with me. Mmmmmm!
Tuesday, July 7th, 2015 on Pariece
Complaining about Una's natural bush is just as obnoxious as whining about shaving. And where is y-y? Maybe we finally lost him. It's possible he would have liked this set.
To me, the question is not shaved or unshaved, it's how the model comes across, the poses, the photographic quality (or lack thereof). A HUGE plus for this set is that Una is getting wet. In my book, that adds a LOT to a set!
A technical note from your friendly resident photographer. If the set is from 2009, that explains a lot, but I have to say Oleg's choices exacerbated the problems.
First, the sun is quite bright (duh!) and Oleg chose to basically hit Irina directly, almost straight-on. (The sunlight is pretty much coming from behind his left shoulder, so nearly flat lighting) Then, the older sensor chips had a hard time with overexposure, so even 1/4 or 1/3 of a stop would cause the highlights to block up, which is not a pleasing look. Added to the flat direction of light, and you have the reasons viewers are complaining.
My additional gripe is the #30 to #34 series, ALL focused on her face, not one diversion from that. And honestly, with that bright sunlight, there's no reason not to shoot at f/22 or f/32, giving you plenty depth of field to go from eyes to pussy. No excuse for that.
But they are both retired, so I feel like I'm whipping a dead horse. My purpose is to bring a technical explanation to the comments that are being made.
Monday, July 6th, 2015 on Stalosi
There are so many factors that contribute to getting an OMG reaction to a model or a not-so-wowed reaction. You had the latter, I had the former. I think for me it was her seductive smile, a very pleasing face, then her alluring poses, and last but not least the fact that her vagina just opens up and seems to invite you in, which is actually not all that common.
If you are a big tit lover, she will not float your boat, that's a possibility.
But yeah, maybe it was just my testosterone level when I woke up this morning!
Monday, July 6th, 2015 on Torona
So much for the theory that the only way to a high rating is with explicit close-ups. Tells you something about the popularity of Candice. I personally think that towards the end, some close-ups would have been most welcome and potentially very very exciting. Oh well, maybe next time Leonardo?
Monday, July 6th, 2015 on Milosa
When using the flash-fill technique, I always put a subtle "warm-up" filter over the flash. Otherwise, most xenon flash tubes will give you a bluish light (Broncolor being the exception- this Swiss manufacturer of strobes coats their xenon tubes with some kind of gold to warm up the color balance.)
The over-9 rating is well-deserved. Lilit has a face that would melt any man's heart (and some women's too), then she goes on to reveal her perfect body in such a sexy way. Meanwhile, Arkisi is being masterful as usual. Then the "open" shots, OMG how could a girl's pussy be more enticing? 10+++
Thanks for the nod to our Independence Day. To so many Americans, it's just about drinking, BBQ and fireworks. So to ME, presenting American beauties in the nude seems to me a much better way of celebrating.
In another post it was postulated that a low score usually reflects a low level of explicitness or lack of pussy close-ups. I think this set sort of debunks that theory (though I think it's usually true)- this set has a pretty high score, while not being particularly explicit. Says something about Blake's seductive girl-next-door look!
Saturday, July 4th, 2015 on Presenting Blake Bartelli
Agreed, those tantalizing hairs we see on the silly "landing strip" are a gorgeous color (hint of ginger in there?) Makes me think a bush on her would be very nice. (A nod to the y-y perspective)
OMG her eyes, good job featuring her lovely face. Her privates do stay slammed shut, but this is after all a debut. I think it's clear that we all are looking forward to seeing much more of Margo Claire!
Friday, July 3rd, 2015 on Presenting Margo
It really is delightful when such lovely bits "open up." I think there are some viewers that find it vulgar or too much for MA, but I happen to think it's wonderful. My guess is that it's up to the model if she wants to be that revealing. And then I think some photographers never ask. But Arkisi does, and Pandora delivered!
Friday, July 3rd, 2015 on Antichi
Two tribes indeed! Some yin and yang for our bush-friend y-y. (I know, it's not your beloved Kristel A, but I'm hoping you are capable of being complimentary!)
Normally I'm not a fan of two-girl sets, but despite a few awkward poses, this one works.
Thursday, July 2nd, 2015 on Fullate
You are correct, I had not looked at any of the movies yet. Thank you for the tip, I will watch! :)
Wednesday, July 1st, 2015 on Mesura
Oh, and #30 and #31 in Maduro, also see #28 and #64 in Ball.
Ha ha, I'm not really doing this out of the goodness of my heart, it's FUN finding explicit shots!
By "hard core presentational shot" I assume you mean a shot or shots of the girl opening her pussy by spreading her lips apart. On Eternal Desire, Arkisi has done quite a few sets with Sybil A., and most of them are similar to this set- gorgeous pussy pictures, but slammed shut labia :(
Just a tad more revealing are #54 and #55 in JEEL (21 May 2014) on Eternal Desire. You get a little peek inside, which is of course very exciting!
Not a complaint either, but if those lips DID part, I may just drop dead as well. And it would have been worth it!
Tuesday, June 30th, 2015 on Rejian
Agreed, the mohawk can go. But if you got your wish, those world-class labia could be obscured a bit. I know you don't agree, it's just my opinion.
So even though I like pubic hair, in this case I vote for bald. And the strip can go too. My humble opinion...
Yes, detailed assessment is a noble task!
Tuesday, June 30th, 2015 on Pyvian
Zarina is gorgeous, I could never complain about seeing her undressed. But I guess I'm too much of a purist, the hair is a bit over the top ("clown hair" summed it up nicely) And my personal opinion, I think landing strips look ridiculous. But even so, the set works because Zarina is so hot and seductive.
It is laudable that Catherine stretched to do a different kind of photoshoot. Personally, I'm less interested in the concept or props, and more focused on the girl- her body of course, but also the personality that comes through. I was happy to see the gloves come off, but then they went back on again. Oh well, nice idea, but there were too many shots where the concept takes center stage.
From the looks of #123, this shoot got her kinda wet down there. Who knows what else is going on during the shoot? Flirting, talk of what might happen after the session, who knows? I doubt the gloves and bucket were responsible for Winnie getting wet, but I'd sure like to take advantage of it!
Tuesday, June 30th, 2015 on Navyel
Red hair? Where do you see red hair?
I'm a redhead, and my gf laughs that I'm too strict about who gets into the redhead club. I would not call Winnie a redhead.
But, I would welcome Winnie in my bed- THAT club she can join for free! :)
Yeah but the Woodstock hippies are ancient now, not model material anymore. Fernanda does have that look, doesn't she? Despite growing weary of your mono-message, yin_yang, I do agree she would look good natural.
Wednesday, June 24th, 2015 on Pelea
If you look down at the bottom, the hairs on her arm are in focus. No doubt that's what Matiss wanted us to pay attention to. (jk)
Sounds like you kinda liked her...
Wednesday, June 24th, 2015 on Sedali
I've never been a fan of using fake lube for these photo shoots, but I gotta say if Roberta were oiled up for me, the slipping and sliding would sure be fun!
As if things weren't hot enough, #98- 100 certainly invite fantasy of some "back door" play. My my, how deliciously naughty. :)
Wednesday, June 24th, 2015 on Dosona
The eyes do it for me right off the bat. How'd you like to wake up on a Sunday morning to those eyes? Yeah I know you "did it" all night, but wouldn't you want to do her again?
I thought Lija is more of a porn-star look than girl-next-door, but hot nonetheless (usually I prefer the GND look.) Interesting how we imagine different things from looking at these girls.
As usual, Arkisi does a spendid job, I do think he's one of the best.
Thanks to all involved, what a visual treat!
As a natural redhead myself, it's hard for me to get fired up about orange from a bottle, but hey it's the entire package that the model brings to the party combined with the skill (or lack of skill) the photographer contributes, right?
Add it all up, and Violla is a winner. What a body, thank you so much for sharing it with us!
Tuesday, June 23rd, 2015 on Posada
William and kilroy already mentioned this, but I was about to say that I felt that her hands were used too often for framing purposes, to no real benefit to the photo, in my opinion. Granted, I am always hoping hands on either side of a model's pussy means she is going to spread her lips, and of course I'm often disappointed, but the hand placement in this set is more obviously contrived, so it's even more annoying.
Yet in the end, it was a pleasure to see Leila's svelte body, and the lighting was excellent.
Monday, June 22nd, 2015 on Logia
Unfortunately, fer_realz, I think you are right.
Saturday, June 20th, 2015 on Eresit
Went to #7 and noticed those cute freckles on her nose. Kissable, indeed!
Most likely Matiss shot with strobe lights. They are VERY bright for 1/1000th of a second, and most of the time what you see on the set are called "modeling lights", which give you an idea of what the strobe light will be, but they are very dim compared to the flash. The low light of the modeling lights are probably responsible for her large pupils. I kinda doubt they were eating psilocybin mushrooms, lol.
Friday, June 19th, 2015 on Necadi
...forgot the second part of my post...
Go to the new site, and at the far left there's an orange tab- that's where you should be saying what you think of the new format. I agree with you all that it sucks! Seems that's the consensus, anyway.
Friday, June 19th, 2015 on Eresit
Starting with Alyssa: wow! Stunning in every way, she rocks my world. I know some here sneer at the "gyno" shots, but 100 and 101 make me wanna get inside. Then I'm not normally as drawn to a woman's anus as I am to her pussy, but some of those from-behind shots are pretty inviting to slip it into her bum.
Her fresh face and dynamite body are a killer combination. I love the little hairs on her thighs and around her pussy catching the window-light, very nice.
Friday, June 19th, 2015 on Presenting Bretona
Agreed, aren't they perfect?
Thursday, June 18th, 2015 on Vasune
Antonio should have done more than confine Lupita to that stool and the one spot later on. Not that the set is bad, but it really limited the poses. With prime material like Lupita, that's a shame.
But criticism of the photography aside, Lupita is simply stunning. To my visual aesthetics, she has it all, what a face and body!
If you aren't imagining that you are the one undressing these models (or the lucky recipient of said undressing), then you're missing half the fun!
Sorry to be so dense, but FD/AU???
Katie A is lovely, and her sweet little pussy looks so nice, but Fabrice does not do her body justice with this set. Sets done by other photographers are better, especially Arkisi. BTW, some nice sets of her on Eternal Desire.
Wednesday, June 17th, 2015 on Rotise
Agreed, looking into Loretta's face would be a dream come true.
I kept hoping those lovely curtains would part, but alas it was not meant to be. As with Rylsky's set today, I think some color correction in Photoshop would have made this set even better. Looks like Arkisi primarily used window light, which is very nice, but has a greenish/cyan hue.
Still, seeing Loretta naked gets my heart racing!
Wednesday, June 17th, 2015 on Nituna
I agree Tiffany looks great, but IMHO Rylsky has done better work. Almost all of the shots need serious color correction. Many of the shots are green with a cyan tinge. Then there's lots of repetition.
I still enjoyed this set, but primarily because Tiffany is such a cutie.
Wednesday, June 17th, 2015 on Yugen
Maybe the lighting is a bit flat, hence the "porcelain doll" comments, but I just melt seeing her creamy skin. And the comment about innocence with a hint of mischief is spot-on as well.
Thank you Koenart for following #85 with #86- somebody is listening, or common sense prevailed.
Tuesday, June 16th, 2015 on Jsuni
Lydia A has a nearly perfect body. Without MetArt I wouldn't even imagine such perfect bodies existed out there. I don't know why but when the areola is small, the size of the breast seems enhanced. LOVE her nipples, small areola and perfectly-shaped tits. (drool)
Classic Arkisi lighting and posing- stellar job as usual. #95 is an unusual angle, don't see that often. I heartily approve!
Tuesday, June 16th, 2015 on Cimora
Mia D is indeed awesome. Thank you Leonardo for the series starting with #11 which is very exciting. I don't think ALL the shots require her tugging the panties up tight, but frontal panty shots are so rare, I have to congratulate you for shooting that series. Gets the juices flowing for things to come!
This complaint has been said over and over, I don't think the message is being heard by the photographers, but once again, on shots like 69 and 90, it's so frustrating when a model is making her pussy the #1 focus of the shot, and the photographer ONLY focuses on her face. Not that her face isn't gorgeous and worthy of many shots, but with poses like that, it's a crime not to shift the focus to her pussy for at least one shot.
Tuesday, June 16th, 2015 on Ocini
No, actually MY tongue would be better suited!
At any rate, I'm guessing the position has already been filled.
Saturday, June 13th, 2015 on Bimme
Catherine is becoming one of my favorite photographers. Not sure if she is getting better or if I'm just noticing her work lately.
But having said that, the lighting is just a tad flat, meaning non-directional. If you look at the catch-lights in her eyes, you'll see two large lights more or less equal in brightness; hence the flatness of light. Sort of the opposite of Arkisi, who sometimes gets TOO dramatic and directional. The good news is that Lenore is well lit, no pesky shadows to obscure her lovely bits.
All this was not meant to be a criticism, BTW. Just offereing feedback from one photographer to another. All in all, a dynamite set, Lenore will linger in my dreams, that's for sure!
They end up looking kinda dark, don't they? BTW, on TLE they seem to think that WAY underexposed & dark is the way to go. So if you like trying to imagine what you're missing, or if you like sex in the dark, you will love TLE. :(
Digital images are made up of 255 gradations from white to black. Ideally, a photo should have the full range from 0 to 255. You can graph the distribution of course- if you do so for red, green and blue, it's called a histogram. Open these pictures in Photoshop, and you'll see that these images contain a very limited range, not anywhere close to the ideal 0 to 255 (black=0 and 255=white).
Friday, June 12th, 2015 on Eniel
You love dogs more than gorgeous girls? Wow we humans sure are varied, aren't we?
Friday, June 12th, 2015 on Laterca
In 61 and 64 we see that she is oozing with delicious feminine juices. Seems sort of a shame to wash them away, but that was probably the plan all along. If it had been me shooting, I'd have her spread her juices around her lips and we'd have a natural wet look! Better than shower wet, in my humble opinion.
Welcome Azzura, come back again soon!
Friday, June 12th, 2015 on Presenting Azzura
No complaints with Sapphira, but on a technical note, this entire set would benefit from a run through Photoshop (it CAN be used for good!) with either an auto "Levels" adjustment, or manually going in and picking a white point. They went to a lot of trouble to hire the model, find a location, probably bring in makeup people, set up the lights, etc etc. Then they skimp on post-production, and the result is a muted dingy look on many of the shots. Just my opinion, but I thought technical excellence was part of the MetArt credo?
Yes indeed, very hot. But why are panty shots from the front so rare? If the photographers assume there's no interest there, they are sadly mistaken.
Ooo, no judgement there, right?
Shaving may not be your cup 'o tea, but it's hardly mutilation, it grows back easily. Contrast that to piercings gone awry which leave scars, and I honestly wonder what people are going to do about their precious tattoo sleeves when their skin starts to sag with age? That, in my opinion qualifies as mutilation.
This is a pretty nice set. Kami is über-hot, wow would I like to be younger and on a date with her!
I like the warm hair light, one of my tricks "in the day" when I was a working photographer. There were a few close-up shots where I wished there was more fill light, but that's because I'm an incurable horn-dog, wanting to see even more pussy details.
That is sad to hear that Erro retired, but thankfully left behind a legacy of highly erotic pictures of gorgeous women.
Friday, June 12th, 2015 on Maidi
"the lighting is a little dim"
Yes, I think so too. Iskan is certainly not the lighting master like Arkisi or Rylsky or Catherine.
But I still get to fantasize about being on a date with Melony and trying not to stare at her tits TOO much, but dying to get her home to get that bra off and dive in. I'm actually not a big-breast fan, but I'd somehow manage to suffer through playing with Melony's.
Thursday, June 11th, 2015 on Halun
Another fine set by Arkisi, and of course Macy gets my heart racing (along with many of you out there)
I will quibble with the focus on 61 however. Looks like her thumbs are in focus. Then for 62, some fingers are in focus. WTF? Finally, in 63 the focus makes sense. When depth of field is so shallow, one must focus carefully. I'm assuming autofocus is off, but maybe I'm wrong.
Still, a solid showing and a delight to see.
Thursday, June 11th, 2015 on Duzena
Sumptuous Altea gets my motor revving, but alas, the photography leaves me decidedly underwhelmed.
I don't agree that Erro used the natural light with expertise. Color balance all over the place, most are too "warm", some are corrected, which is weird. Then in so many shots she is revealing her body to the camera, but the shadows are in all the wrong places.
Hot model, but the photography leaves a lot to be desired.
Wednesday, June 10th, 2015 on Edana
Right, I didn't know where to give them feedback either. To me, the most irritating thing is the thumbnail feature. They are all square, so you really don't know what's there until you click on it. Then, if you get annoyed with the thumbnail page and click the red X at the top, it ALWAYS takes you back to pg 1. Grrr, I think the "old" format is better.
Like they say: "if it ain't broke, don't fix it!"
Tuesday, June 9th, 2015 on Myrtone
Agree completely that Starlet is gorgeous and sexy as can be.
Room for improvement if Paromov is listening:
-Cute feminine panties, more close-ups from front as well as behind would be nice next time (please)
-Paromov seems to be big on full-body shots, and I know a lot of you are clamoring for the "full view." But being the incurable horn-dog that I am, I'd really like to see Paromov zoom in to reveal more of her amazing labia.
If you are going to shave, might as well do a good job of it. She looks smooth and silky- it would be ecstacy to dive in!
Leaving stubble and/or those silly "landing strips" (or the dreaded V shape from a few days ago) makes no sense to me. Then I think you should show the hair, which would be fine. One or the other in my humble opinion.
Monday, June 8th, 2015 on Cienti
Thank you, thank you, thank you! I've been trying to get this point across, but I wonder if the photographers are listening? Maybe K can pass along the suggestions.
Monday, June 8th, 2015 on Rajate
Not complaining at all, this set is smoking hot, but suggestions for next time:
- Missed opportunity for some exciting panty shots in the beginning, especially from the front
- In 64 and 65, she is pulling her lips apart, but BOTH shots are focused on the eyes. Take the lead from the model, where is she looking in 64?
But I quibble; Kika is beyond belief, and Arkisi nearly always nails it. (And if he nails the models, I don't want to know- I'd be too jealous!)
Monday, June 8th, 2015 on Quinte
This is the consequence of sleeping in- I see the comments have it pretty well covered. I agree with the consensus that this is a hot set. Kudos to both Xena and Catherine. I have to say, I'm growing more and more impressed with both the aethetic and technical skills of Catherine.
I would have enjoyed more shots like 59, where we get to see Xena's moist pink bits in greater detail. But then I've been accused of being in the "gyno" crowd; guilty as charged, I guess.
But anyway, this kind of photography of incredibly sexy models is why I'm addicted to MetArt.
Sunday, June 7th, 2015 on Autha
Well, in Puerto Vallarta there's a very nice...
Oh wait, that was a rhetorical question, lol
Saturday, June 6th, 2015 on Osalta
I don't think you're being petty at all. To me it looks absurd. Hopefully it was just an experiment, and will go away.
Saturday, June 6th, 2015 on Foneti
As has been mentioned, the saving grace here is that it's Emily Bloom, and it's a treat to see her undressed no matter what. But to be honest, this is not my favorite set of her.
I'll start my usual panty suggestion with a compliment- 46 is delightful, with the shadow of her lace panties casting a nice pattern on her skin. Wish there were more shots like that.
Then of course there's the color balance. The shots in the sunlight are normal, because daylight (with sun) is the standard 5,500° Kelvin. Go into the shade (54 and on..) and the illumination is coming from the sky which is about 12,000°K if my memory serves me. My opinion is that blue/cyan cast is not very flattering to show off lovely Emily in the nude. Yes, we can all go into Photoshop and fix that, but Erik and/or his staff should have done that.
Saturday, June 6th, 2015 on Egala
Re-read your first comment, and yes I agree it's mostly positive.
Your fixation on ONE model is really striking, yin-yang. So that's the driver of your crusade, so be it.
You're right, you are liberally criticized here. You make yourself such an easy target, it's irresistable!
And actually yin-yang, I do have a sense of humor. I'll see if I can inject more humor into my comments. We are here after all, to have some fun, right?
Friday, June 5th, 2015 on Presenting Una Piccola
"I can't help it if you guys can't read and are blind"
That's getting a bit nasty, watch your manners please.
You often say "I call it as I see it", and others can do that as well. I see constant dissatisfaction with the girls to be negativity. Then we get a gorgeous girl with a nice bush but that's not enough. I'm just calling it as I see it, feels pretty negative to me.
Granted, you are wanting to be fair to yin-yang, but I think it's fair of C6C791 to point out the chronic negativity. I guess we should be grateful for the positive comments, and just suck up the negativity.
BTW her pubes look pretty much grown out to me. You are saying there might be some dreaded trimming going on? Heaven forbid!
So true, because of the digital world, I can be in California and still soak in the erotic beauty of girls half-way around the world. I would prefer to touch them in person, but at least I get to look, thanks to the gorgeous girls, and photographers like Rylsky.
Arkisi does have a dramatic lighting style, which is to say more directional than most photographers. Result is that there are often deep shadows, and sometimes precisely what you want to see is relatively unlit. In general, I like his style, but from time to time it's too much. As you noted, christoph, the set is very high contrast.
Arkisi DOES get that many of us really do love the explicit "open" shots, and he is doing more and more of that. See Eternal Desire, some of the sets are off the charts!
Thursday, June 4th, 2015 on Stimme
*Lilit, not Lillit...
What one viewer sees as "gross porn displays" is another viewer's dream come true. I'm pretty sure if you were actually having sex with Lillit (oh please, dear Lord!) that you would see such views as she's inviting you in. Far from "gross" in my mind.
Right, it's a frustrating shot to be sure. So much potential, not a good outcome. There is a finger at the top in focus, then it looks pretty sharp inbetween her vagina and her anus. Maybe Arkisi was hoping if he split the difference, the DOF would bring both into focus, but at these distances, he'd need f/32 to pull that off, and I'm pretty sure he was nowhere near f/32.
Milena D is hot, just the kind of girl who gets me fired up! And the fur is just fine, I like it (and guessing y-y is happy for once.)
Speaking of y-y, I'll join him in being a broken record and repeat myself once again. The set starts out with promise, her outfit is fun and naughty, a good way to tease and get aroused. My usual complaint is that #7 is really the only frontal shot with panties on, which is great (but why does it look so soft with the focus? More on that later...) The only time Erik moves in close with the panties on is #12, a rear shot. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE rear shots, they are exciting, but why not more tease shots up close of the front half of these girls?
Then overall, my complaint is lack of sharpness. So many shots just do not look focused, or "soft" for some reason. In a few cases I can see an area in focus that makes no sense, so I'm left wondering WTF?
No complaint with Milena D though, she is sexy as hell!
Thursday, June 4th, 2015 on Rodina
I don't find the lighting too bright. In fact, I think it gives the shots a clarity that I find appealing. All the better to see Peony's tasty bits! If you look at the close facial photos, notice the catch-lights in her eyes. The lower light is brighter than the upper light, which is not what we are used to seeing. For erotic photography, lighting like that makes sense. Strong light from above, which we are more familiar with, often leaves the model's pussy in shadow, or very dark compared to her face. It's possible that's what Dark_Storm is noticing. (?)
Anyway, Peony is a delight, hope to see more of her in the future.
Wednesday, June 3rd, 2015 on Presenting Peony
Love Dennie's trim body- some of us are born lean, and I'm happy NOT to see comments that she needs cheeseburgers, etc.
I liked the panty shots too, but as usual, there's way more rear shots with the panties, and other than 32 (which is nice), nothing shot from the front. I don't understand why the photogs are doing that. What could be hotter than a girls delicious mound hidden behind a thin (maybe sheer) layer of feminine underwear? I do hope this message is read by some of MetArt's photographers.
But anyway, Dennie gets my blood pumping; good way to start my day!
Tuesday, June 2nd, 2015 on Kaltie
Nancy A has always been a favorite of mine, she has a very long list of positive assets! But this time Leonardo has knocked one out of the ballpark. I always hoped he had it in him, this set certainly elevates his status in my mind.
Great set from a fabulous team!
Monday, June 1st, 2015 on Sunria
I agree with hipshot that black panties are overused and overrated. Lighter colors allow you to see more subltle details so you can imagine (or try to imagine) what's underneath. Pink is also nice, as is anything frilly and feminine.
Well ahem, actually I think pulling panties to the side is pretty hot but there should be plenty of tease shots before that happens. Just my opinion, of course.
Sunday, May 31st, 2015 on Dolome
Great set, I really appreciate Catherine's lighting, she does a very nice job with it. And Winnie, well what can I say that hasn't already been said in praise of her?
I also want to acknowledge the panty shots- very exciting! Other photographers will show panties from far away or sometimes from the back (which is very nice), but rarely close frontal shots of panties. Kudos to Catherine for doing those shots.
Nici has a body to die for. Perfect everything. Thanks DG for bringing us these images.
Saturday, May 30th, 2015 on Yeniu
Assume Kristel A is your heart-throb. Yes, she looks delicious, hair and all...
Friday, May 29th, 2015 on Inorea
Mea culpa for not paying enough attention. I will look her up.
I've heard you insinuate this "deathly afraid" thing before, and I think you overdramatize it. Those who prefer shaved aren't hiding from anything necessarily. Having been a pro photographer for 25 years, I'm obviously a visual person, and to me the pubic hairs hide a lot of what I'd like to see.
But I totally "get" your view that seeing a girl both ways is cool. No argument there. I just react to saying a shaven girl is not appealing. To me, that's offensive.
We are not really all that far apart in our thinking after all.
No, I don't know who u-know-who is. She's the one reason you stay on MA? Still seems weird to me. I will look her up if you'd care to share her name again.
I did notice a hint in one of yesterday's y-y posts that suggested you might even enjoy the sight of a naked young girl who is (gasp) shaven. Or maybe I was hallucinating.
I prefer shaven, I think it's sexier, so I don't buy the "sexual hair" description, but on the other hand to say it's filthy or disgusting is way over the top, can't agree with that either.
If the girl is hot and sexy, I'm happy. Pubic hair or none, it's all good.
It's interesting how the initial color images are such low contrast and unsaturated. I thought that was deliberate, but it doesn't sound like it. Not sure I understand how the window light bouncing off the floor would produce this effect.
But in the end, it's the girl we are here to look at, and Katia certainly pleases the eyes!
Friday, May 29th, 2015 on Presenting Katia
Delicious freckles, love 'em!
Interesting rear angle on 60 and 61 that we don't often see. Alas, the camera is focused on the feet! Such a shame. I understand there are "feet guys" out there, but most of us are looking elsewhere.
Thursday, May 28th, 2015 on Majadi
I don't get it. You stay on this site because of one or two favs? And then you find fault with nearly every other model, subject us to your futile attempts to tell them what to do in a supposedly clever and/or cute way (complete with all the icons known to man), and then if you get any flak from the true MA fans, you smugly fire back that your view is the "truth" and suggest we are all out to lunch for growing weary of your posts?
Download your "favs" in high res, then find a site that doesn't feature all this "horrible" shaving! It's not rocket science...
Yeah, when you post late, it's likely nobody sees it. Especially if you're on the West Coast of the US, being late to the party is the norm. Being in Hawaii would be even worse (but I'd put up with that to live there!)
Some people DO seem to see when you comment on their post however, even if old. Are they just going back and checking or is there some setting that notifies you when something you've posted gets commented on?
Thursday, May 28th, 2015 on Ryven
You are not alone, stujo!
My scolding awaits as well...
Wednesday, May 27th, 2015 on Ryven
(once upon a time, I could spell...)
Yani certainly fits the "spinner" description. Ideal in my mind, keep the doghnuts away!
Is it too early to write Santa and ask if Yani could be under my tree?
Smashing set, Steffi certainly elicits a stiffie! :)
Several shots are in the "c'mon in" catagory, I would surely LOVE to.
I see Rylsky as being in the same league technically with Arkisi- the lighting is impeccable.
Tuesday, May 26th, 2015 on Oserane
I love the explicit shots, Arkisi certainly does know how to do those to perfection. I really REALLY hate to agree with y-y, but natural would be so much better than that ridiculous shaved triangle. OR (sorry, y-y) clean shaven would work better as well. Trimming and shaving as if she were a garden ornament looks ludicrous.
But there's enough good about her face, her body, the poses and Arkisi's impeccable photography to make this a very nice visual treat.
Tuesday, May 26th, 2015 on Golyca
Exciting set, got my juices flowing, that's always a good thing.
I agree that the über-manicured heart or landing strips you sometimes see are kind of silly. Doesn't ruin anything for me, but not a bonus either.
I've got to wonder how a totally out of focus shot like 42 gets past the first edit? Or maybe there is no editing. (?)
Monday, May 25th, 2015 on Cienad
I know what the definition of gorgeous is, thank you very much.
Don't know why I waste my time with this guy, he is incorrigible.
Friday, May 22nd, 2015 on Presenting Valensia
If you have access to Eternal Desire, Arkisi has two sets of her there. No hiding of her breasts, that's for sure.
Apparently I'm not the only one who noticed her hot buttocks. Oh, how I would love to caress those cheeks and then...
I don't agree that the panties and bra spoil the intro shots. I think her butt looks stunning in those leopard panties. What I don't understand is why we get behind shots like #8 which are fantastic, but no panty shots of the front? It's not just Arkisi, you just don't see many frontal shots up close with panties. Too bad, I think that would be pretty exciting.
We all understand your obsession y-y but when you make disparaging remarks about the girls ("long way to go" among others), it seems to me you are getting pretty close to putting them down.
Sometimes you present the positive side of natural, and it would be nice if you would stop there and not be condecending to these gorgeous models.
Violla has so many assets, it just boggles the mind. One unusual thing she has are those bits of vaginal tissue that reveal themselves in 45 and 46. Anthropologically speaking, I don't know the purpose of that tissue, but what I do know (from experience, fortunately) is that for a man it FEELS unbelievably good. And so my fantasies get yet another boost!
Friday, May 22nd, 2015 on Ediora
Lucky, I'm guessing you aren't an Art Director. Maybe you could enlighten us with examples of where on MetArt you've seen good photography & good lighting?
Thursday, May 21st, 2015 on Binatta
Yes, finally a glimpse behind those slammed-shut outer lips, but one needs to go to maximum res to actually see her gorgeous pink. Matiss was remiss in not moving in after 110 for more detail.
But still, Karolina gets my heart racing.
Thursday, May 21st, 2015 on Setiera
I agree, the transition is a bit jarring. Going from dramatic lighting to bright over-filled and flat was just too much of a change. But then I started drooling over Karolina's perfect tits and wanting her outer lips to part a bit, and honestly I forgot about the lighting.
Great way to start the day. What a treat to explore Nika's body visually. As usual, Arkisi does the photography bit with excellence.
Really? What do you base that on?
Very nice, and different as y-y keeps asking for. I've always said that natural is the way to go for readheads, that color is so rare.
Sienne is delightful, thank you for sharing your body with us!
Wednesday, May 20th, 2015 on Vandula
What jumps out at me are Roberta's blue eyes. Especially since the lighting is dim, her stunning eyes really pop in these pictures. I guess the idea of the lighting is to suggest low-key mood lighting, but for some reason it doesn't work that well. Sorry Rylsky, you can't nail it every time.
But Roberta makes up for it. One comment about models hands "down there." Often they are placed there, I guess to frame her pussy or give variety to the shots, but often the hands are just THERE, not doing anything. In this set, Roberta actually uses her hands, with a tantalizing result, I might add.
Tuesday, May 19th, 2015 on Batuta
DG, I think it's fun to hear the story behind the photo shoot. Having shot many times on location, I can picture it, thanks to your description. Even though I never shot such erotic subjects, a lot of the elements sound familiar.
It's nice when the photographer takes the time to fill us in on the story behind the pictures!
Tuesday, May 19th, 2015 on Mizeya
With that intense yellow wall, it's inevitable that her skin tones are going to reflect that, so you get that fake tan look. Not sure I agree that he overexposed the shots, though.
I am not a fan of B&W for female nudes, but I agree that the desaturated shots are very interesting- I like the look.
But in the end, it's all about Lauren, and she is looking mighty fine.
Neither skin nor hair evokes "gore" to me in any way, shape or form. We are here to appreciate feminine beauty, why the emphasis on identifying what we find unappealing? The comments are useful if we point out ways the photo shoot could be better, but making insensitive remarks about a model's grooming is offensive to my sensibilities.
Tuesday, May 19th, 2015 on Nemece
Lucky, doesn't it make more sense to say what it is about 64-66 that you would like to see more of? Saying close-ups are "a waste" is dismissive to those (many of us) who LIKE the close-ups. It would be another matter if you were to say the close-ups were poorly done, but it seems that it just comes down to you not wanting them in any set.
Monday, May 18th, 2015 on Domanta
Serena is indeed knock-out gorgeous. I love how she starts out dressed to kill. Imagine as you arrive to pick her up for a date, and she's wearing that fuck-me red skirt. You'd be thinking "this is gonna be a great night!"
Luca did a very nice job with posing Serena, and the lighting is spot-on.
Lija certainly gets my heart racing. Killer body, very confident and sexy demeanor, and impeccable Arkisi posing & lighting. Looking at the score, I have to think that her wet and open pussy shots are boosting the score as well. I don't think I'm the only one to love that combination.
Arkisi impressed me enough to get me to pay for Eternal Desire. Glad I did, amazing addition to my MA subscription.
Sunday, May 17th, 2015 on Yagni
Very pretty Agata is lovely to see in such alluring poses. But the set was not standing out as exceptional until I saw her girl-juices, which to be honest bumps a set up a notch or two. I look forward to seeing more of her.
Not many have agreed with me on this, but when I see stubble I think ouch. Am I the only one who fantasizes about making love to these women? If I was doing what I like to do down there, the stubble would feel prickly in my opinion. Anyway, I vote for natural or neatly trimmed or shaved, but two day stubble just looks like it would spoil the party.
Sunday, May 17th, 2015 on Fileta
Arkisi tends to do more dramatic lighting, very directional. Sometimes there's a lovely bit of anatomy that gets lost in the shadows, but for the most part I'm in awe of Arkisi's lighting. As a photog, it's "safer" to use flat lighting, you can forget about it and just shoot. Arkisi goes the extra mile, and we benefit from his expertise.
We also benefit from beauties such as Ardelia. Life is good!
Saturday, May 16th, 2015 on Athava
My gf has a bush that is unusually dense and I couldn't see any of her tasty bits without pushing lots of hair to the side. So I asked if she'd mind trimming so I could get a better look when we play. Putting it that way, she was happy to comply. I'd estimate an 80% reduction in bush from the trimming. We are older, and shaving is more a young person thing, so I have never asked if she would shave.
As all have said, to "make" a partner do something is really bad. I asked for trimming, explained why, and all's good. Obviously, a person has an interest in how turned on their partner gets, so we both benefit from the trimming.
Saturday, May 16th, 2015 on Kenila
Y-y said: "Yeah, but look at it this way, Red -- a wide-angle 35mm-format focal length would be normal or telephoto on a larger-format cam -- thus you would or could have more DOF with it."
Actually it's the opposite, y-y. A wide-angle lens from a 35mm format camera would not be telephoto on a larger format camera, it would be SUPER wide-angle. You correctly pointed out that as you go from APS-C to full-frame, the focus issues become more critical. As you get larger "film" size (or sensor size nowadays), the focal length of the lenses gets longer, so your DOF gets less. Hope that makes sense.
Friday, May 15th, 2015 on Ynsete
As a redhead myself, I'm pleased to see that being a ginger is popular (when I was a kid I was teased brutally) but her color is a bit much. She's just having fun with it I guess. I wouldn't mind having fun with HER.
For anyone interested in technical stuff (some of you said you liked my technical explanations), I posted a rather long explanation of focus issues on Lucia's page from yesterday. Posted late at night, so most of you likely missed it.
Y-y replied about "normal" focal length for various formats- 50mm is considered normal for full-frame 35mm format, 80mm for 6x6 cm format, and 210mm for 4x5 view camera. I think 8x10 normal is around 360mm.
If you DO go back to read my post (if you can find it), I failed to use a word which helps, and that is PLANE of focus. Imagine a pane of glass at the point where you focus. That pane of glass is exactly parallel to the film plane (or sensor plane) of the camera. Anything closer or farther away from the camera is out of focus. As you stop the lens down, the thickness of that pane of glass increases- one third towards the camera, two thirds away. A view camera (or perspective-control lens) allows you to tilt that pane of glass, or plane of focus as it's called. So a reclining model could have sharp eyes, sharp nipples, and sharp pussy even with the lens wide open.
Added to yesterday's post on Lucia's page, hope that all makes sense. For those interested...
Friday, May 15th, 2015 on Presenting Anastasia Azul
It's shocking that any surgeon would ever agree to such a procedure, but money talks I guess. How sad. Also sad that a woman would have such a negative judgment about her labia that she would resort to surgery. We live in a strange world sometimes.
Friday, May 15th, 2015 on Devira
Veselin might say "nothing better than a tasty chocolate", Albert Varin might say "nothing better than colorful fabric", but I would say "nothing better than a creamy pussy!"
Thursday, May 14th, 2015 on Hamai
OK, a lot to answer here. The focal length of the lens is the main factor. Yes, full-frame DSLRs use longer focal length lenses, so depth of field would be less because of that. Shutter speed is irrelevant when you're shooting with strobes, unless it's a mixed-light situation, ie., natural ambient light plus flash fill. In order to stop down the aperture and get more depth of field, you need more oomph to your lights. It might be an artistic decision, or it might be that they don't have the horsepower lighting-wise to stop down. Sure the iPhone pics would get all in focus because the iPhone has a very wide-angle lens, which gives you WAY more depth of field, even shooting wide open (lens aperture, not the girls!)
Y-y, medium format cameras and view cameras use even longer focal length lenses. A "normal" 50mm lens on a DSLR would be equivalent to a 210mm lens on a 4x5 view camera. So focus is even MORE critical. The reason you may be thinking larger format cameras can have more DOF is that you can tilt the lens board, giving your focus field a "tilt". In other words, you could angle the areas in focus relative to the camera- eyes and pussy in focus even at wide open apertures, even though they are different distances from the lens. Would be easier to show you in a diagram, but can't do that here. The old Playboy centerfolds were shot on 8x10" view cameras, and depth of field was extremely shallow. The girls had to stay dead-still while focusing was done, and the lens board tilted to do what I was just describing. Painfully slow process, that's why those shots don't exactly look spontaneous.
And y-y, I'm puzzled as to why you advocate fewer pixels? What makes you say 12 is ideal?
Thursday, May 14th, 2015 on Ynsete
It's called shallow depth of field. The photographers use longer focal length leses, because the perspective is flattering to human figures. But you get very shallow depth of field with the longer lenses. You could get everything in focus with a wide-angle lens, but the perspective looks odd. The other solution is to use stronger lights/strobes so the aperture can be stopped down for better depth of field. Depends on how many and what kind of lights they are using.
Of course, the other option (which I'm always harping on) is to take two shots- focus on the eyes and let everything else go soft, then focus on her body somewhere. But as deltagamma once pointed out, you can have that intent, but then the model suddenly changes something significant, and the opportunity is lost.
At least there was one close-up panty shot, #7 is gorgeous. Have some fun with the panties before they come off!
Alyssa is gorgeous, and I'm liking Flora's work more and more. Very nice set.
Wednesday, May 13th, 2015 on Detria
So true, as their skin ages those tattoos will start looking pretty bad.
Up to 8.07 now, but yeah hard to imagine why not higher.
My theory is that... wait, you know I haven't got a clue why the ratings are so goofy!
Bottom line: I think Colleen is stunningly hot, and Arkisi does a great job as usual.
Wednesday, May 13th, 2015 on Ibamu
Another knock-out from Ukraine. Welcome Bellona!
For me the female lubrication enhances the eroticism. If she's getting that excited, then by golly, I will too! :)
Tuesday, May 12th, 2015 on Presenting Bellona
So MX, are you thinking the juice is from a guy? Otherwise I can't imagine how you'd object.
Looks like the real thing to me! Liquid Silk is the closest man-made substance I know of, but honestly this looks genuine. Maybe I just want to keep my fantasy going? Along the same line, I've seen photographers just use oil to make the girls look wet, and it's not at all convincing.
Oops, sorry Rose... guy or gal who gets her...
Tuesday, May 12th, 2015 on Ercano
Aislin melts my heart with her "come hither" looks, and then those tits, OMG and then add her inviting lubrication, and I am SO on board!
Right Josef, the guy who gets her couldn't possibly be anywhere near as deserving as me! Lol, I have those thoughts too... he's probably a jerk, if she only knew what it's like to be with me. Ah, to satisfy that body would be an honor!
Indeed, it seems Latvia down to Ukraine has got a gene pool that can't be beat! If what we see is at all representative, I'd say it's why Russia tried to hang onto the area for so long! (And trying to get some of it back...)
I like the honesty (finally) of you saying "this is a recording."
Truer words were never spoken!
Well, I do get the appeal of Stella, I think her body is amazingly sexy. This is also one of Flora's better sets photographically.
Monday, May 11th, 2015 on Soarde
Yes, it makes sense that given your subject, giving priority to flow and the atmosphere makes a lot of sense. So you are forgiven for the technical flaws if and when they happen, but I will still point them out so you can be aware of the risks next time. But you probably already know.
Nude women are a bit different to manage than people in lab coats doing high tech research for a company brochure! I envy your job, my friend. But the human factor is always the variable that makes life and this work so interesting. Photography has always been a strange mix of aethetics and technicals. We are constantly looking for the right balance!
I appreciate the opportunity to have this dialog, thank you.
Tuesday, May 5th, 2015 on Presenting Anita Bellini
I really appreciate your detailed response to my comments. It restores my faith that we do have a conduit for communication with the artists (photographers and models). What you say about lenses is true and you clearly know your equipment. Yes, I spent 25+ years doing commercial photography, doing full-studio lighting on location anywhere in the world, so traveling was my thing. Loved the overseas assignments! But alas, my subjects were not as interesting or beautiful as yours.
Right, the model can and will change quickly, and so I understand the times when two similar shots with different focus just does not happen as planned. At least I now know ONE photographer who has directly answered this question. Thank you DeltaGamma for your communication and your outstanding work.
Actually I take that back. Looked again at the close-ups, and they are actually sharp with detail, but the lighting is a bit flat, so the contrast is low. Lower contrast gives the APPEARANCE of being soft focus.
The other issue, mentioned above by Greg42 is the whole face vs pussy focus debate. If it's gotta be one or the other, seems simple enough to shoot twice, focus on the eyes in one shot, focus on her pussy in another shot. I wish the photographers were actually listening...
Even the close-ups seem a bit soft. I recall Delta's equipment was stolen awhile back, wondering if maybe the new gear isn't as good? It just seems many of the shots could be more detailed, not sure what the problem is...
Oh, I see, it's ME who is repeating for the hundredth time?
Airbrushing: I don't LOOK for it, I think you do. Maybe you enjoy being all riled up about stuff?
Hair: I like natural hair and I like shaved. Inbetween (landing strips, stubble, etc) I'm not fond of. I'm happy with what MA is dishing up, some sets more than others, of course. YOU do all the asking for hair, no need for me to do that. I do LIKE natural, but I would never say "dear, you'd look BETTER with a bush". That seems presumptuous & slightly condescending to me.
Tuesday, May 5th, 2015 on Nerois
So much of what you see on MetArt is distastful and/or boring to you, seems you'd be doing yourself a favor looking elsewhere. Just sayin'...
Lydia has some ususual features that set her apart. Dark hair with sparkling blue eyes is always a nice treat. Then she is quite slim, which I love, but then she has very large breasts for her frame. Such a hot combination!
As usual, Arkisi does a great job with the technicals.
Oh, I forgot to mention Lydia's meaty labia. Oh my! :)
Tuesday, May 5th, 2015 on Sajini
When I see Catherine now, I know I'm going to enjoy a solid well-photographed set of a beautiful woman. Leanisa is so captivating, with her genuine smile and gorgeous eyes. Oh, and a hot body as well, I just happened to notice that. ;-)
Oh right, I didn't even see that one. It's how it is now, everyone is constantly on their f&#@ing phone!
Tuesday, May 5th, 2015 on Giesta
Celeste is a beauty, I think the rating of 8.05 makes no sense. Actually I think it's useless to try to figure out why the ratings end up being what they are. Mystery to me sometimes.
Celeste gets kudos for the pussy juices. My oh my, that gets me in the mood! And glad to hear Deltagamma was aware of the appeal. Editing those out would be criminal.
When I saw the thumbnails, it looked like she was holding a mobile device. Then open to see it's a BOOK. Wow, this really is fantasy!
Monday, May 4th, 2015 on Giesta
As I've said before, don't hold your breath. If you do manage to wave a magic wand, could we get rid of tattoos at the same time? Oh, and how about lip & tongue piercings?
Monday, May 4th, 2015 on Achna
Agreed. Imagine waking up to that beautiful face!
Sunday, May 3rd, 2015 on Linze
Utterly stunning news. Not surprising that y-y chose to educate us on that tidbit of historical data.
Can't add much to what's been said. She rocked my world, that's for sure! I NEVER download sets, but this one is an exception.
Friday, May 1st, 2015 on Medna
Your posts are hard to read sometimes Seller. My take on it was a complaint about you not being happy when MetArt gets "too explicit" or "unusually open legged" models. Is that accurate?
Friday, May 1st, 2015 on Yapen
Lighting is impeccable, doesn't get any better.
But some questionable focus decisions, like 82. He focuses on her belly button, so pussy and titties are not clear. Not solid in my book.
Thursday, April 30th, 2015 on Yapen
Exactly my thought. Cutest butt I've seen in awhile. (or bum for those over the pond)
I'm surprised the rating isn't higher for Tiffany, she got my engines revving. Maybe the ratings are more of an aggregate testosterone level for that day of the viewers. (My apologies to the females who are here, but actually testosterone factors into your libido as well)
Wednesday, April 29th, 2015 on Frouli
T-levels, that must be it. I must have dropped below a thousand, the sets today just didn't get me fired up as usual. Even the heavyweights, Arkisi and Rylsky seemed to have lackluster sets. But you're point is well taken- maybe it's just a low testosterone day for me! (?)
Tuesday, April 28th, 2015 on Presenting Stephie Love
Night certainly has the kind of body I go crazy over. For some reason, I'm just not warming up to this set. To me, the V shave looks silly- I hope it doesn't catch on.
Lovely girl, but I'd say this is not one of Arkisi's better photo shoots.
Tuesday, April 28th, 2015 on Binde
A day at the coast with Sapphira would be heaven.
I'm not sure I could get my footing to take advantage of her over that log, but I'd sure be willing to give it a try! :)
I agree with the "best pussy" comment, it's delightful!
Monday, April 27th, 2015 on Qedry
OK, maybe slutty was the wrong word. "Cute and naughty" is better, I agree. Anyway, she fills me with desire, 'nuff said.
Monday, April 27th, 2015 on Fysko
Wow, her inner pink contrasting with her dark labia is quite striking!
Beautiful girl, and Arkisi rarely if ever disappoints.
Monday, April 27th, 2015 on Lizida
Lupita has a way of looking slutty yet sophisticated at the same time. Just the kind of girl I'd like to meet!
Nice set, I did see a few shots where the focus seemed a bit off. I guess if I were Antonio, I'd have a hard time thinking of anything besides having sex with this hottie.
Many subscribers to MetArt want highly erotic, and pussy fits the bill. Having said that, beyond highly erotic, artistic quality is the hallmark of MetArt. This does not preclude pussy shots, but means the quality of the shoots should be high along with a focus on the beauty of the model. There should be plenty of what you want and what others want in a shoot like this. Just ignore the shots that you think are superfluous. There are many of us who think pussy and classy can coexist in a photo shoot.
Sunday, April 26th, 2015 on Presenting Mirayn
Yani herself makes my heart sing.
The lens flare makes my heart sink. I understand the technical problems with strong backlighting, you really need to shade the lens to avoid lens flare. When shooting such precious subjects, a little care technically would be appreciated.
Saturday, April 25th, 2015 on Trinda
I'm curious which shots you think are out of focus, and which shots you feel are poorly Photoshopped?
Saturday, April 25th, 2015 on Presenting Mirayn
Being in California, my day starts way later than most of you, but WOW what a great way to start the day! Mirayn knocks my socks off, what a hot sexy and lovely woman. I'd have preferred more panty tease, but the poses are great, the way she "opens up" is breathtaking, and as usual Arkisi does a masterful job with lighting. Set like this make my membership more than worth it.
Right, a 7 or 8 rating for a set might look more like 5 for the photography, and 10 for the model. It's a flawed system to be sure. I don't attach much significance to the ratings, it's just mildly interesting.
Friday, April 24th, 2015 on Confira
Sheesh, crunching these stats must mean you have a LOT of spare time on your hands!
That's good to know Rose, thank you. Being a professional photographer myself, I know it's hard to hear criticism, but if you can disconnect your ego from it, good things can come from listening. You are right, that the progression does indicate SOME of them do listen.
Amelie is amazing, no doubt about it. Agree that Leonardo could have done a much better job with the shoot. First, my rant of late, those blue panties are so enticing, why not do more shots with the panites being the focus? Yes, it's fun as she takes them off, but Leonardo seems to always focus on the eyes. Not that they aren't stunning eyes, but c'mon, do another shot with the focus on where the action is.
Feels like suggestions to the photographers go unnoticed. K, is that true? A few of the photographers respond to comments, so obviously they are paying attention, but in general I feel like our feedback is just for our entertainment, nothing else.
Yes indeed, and IMHO more could have been done with the panties.
Looks like I'm not alone being in awe of her body. It comes pretty close to being my ideal perfect body in every way. Add the sweet smile and lovely blue eyes, and I'm in! (Well, I WISH I was in!)
Friday, April 24th, 2015 on Ransa
Agreed, we are talking fantasy here. Imagining running into one of these ladies is enhanced by seeing what she might look like when out shopping. THEN we can relish her undressing even more!
Wednesday, April 22nd, 2015 on Eglante
Nice set, and Brandi would be a most welcome addition to my "recreational" activities (right, dream on!)
At the risk of sounding repetitious like you-know-who, I'll rant again about lack of nice close panty shots. We get #18, that's it. And why that view and not the front? After that it's the panties coming off, which is fun, but I will say once again I think the photographers are missing key opportunities to play with the eroticism of panties.
Wednesday, April 22nd, 2015 on Menoa
I love the light skimming her bum in 26, her little hairs catching the light is gorgeous (well, and her bum as well, of course). Wish there had been more shots of those amazing nipples.
Tuesday, April 21st, 2015 on Loaze
The set doesn't do a thing for me, but as you can see, some guys like the hog thing. Not me, I thought it was a waste of two very hot models. Oh well, can't please them all, eh?
Tuesday, April 21st, 2015 on Nisake
Y-y should be happy today. I like it too, red pubes should never be shaved, it's so rare.
Starting out with the pretty white dress is great, I do wish there had been some panty play in the beginning, but I'm not complaining about how it all turned out- very very exciting!
Monday, April 20th, 2015 on Telkis
Right, like tatoos? I don't think either of us should hold our breath, y-y!
Sunday, April 19th, 2015 on Lenida
119 and 125 are unusual angles, lighting is impeccable, and oh so inviting! If I died and went to heaven, hopefully Leona would be there waiting for me.
Sunday, April 19th, 2015 on Renies
Like I said the other day, panties can be so much fun, and as you mention, they go away very quickly. But having said that, a nice debut, hope to see a LOT more of this lovely woman. I'd love to see Arkisi do a shoot with her!
Saturday, April 18th, 2015 on Presenting Rozi
The past few days their server has been really slow. Last night was the worst. Today it's actually not bad. Many factors affect speed I think, but certainly MetArt is a popular place, and they do get bogged down sometimes.
Friday, April 17th, 2015 on Yvneca
Indeed, it's difficult to imagine a more compelling face or more beautiful eyes. I'm guessing even in the morning with no makeup, she looks stunning.
Yum, I love every square inch (or cm) of Vivian. I would NOT kick her out of bed, lol.
I'm constantly amazed how seldom you see frontal close-ups when the model is wearing sexy panties. Seems like a no-brainer to take one or two shots of her lovely mound surrounded by silky lace, but alas the photographers are ignoring that view for some reason. Am I alone in wanting that?
Thursday, April 16th, 2015 on Kajli
Yes, thank you to Melanie Klein for outlining something we all do- projective identification.
My my, we certainly have veered off from the usual pussy talk, lol.
Wednesday, April 15th, 2015 on Etinda
Agree with you completely, but not sure I'm 100% on board with your comment "he is not disrespectful to either the models or other people" There are times when (in my opinion) he crosses the line. It's one thing to say a shoot could have been better if A, B and C had been done differently. It's another to say a set has little value because the model chooses to look a certain way.
Very nice set, I appreciate the upskirt shots, so deliciously naughty. You don't see that much, or for that matter many panty shots. Wish there were more of those. Sometimes it's more exciting to imagine what's underneath the panties!
For what it's worth, I added some final comments to yesterday's heated rant. I apologized for being intolerant, and I heard the feedback that my technical posts are not appreciated, so I will cut back drastically on anything resembling a photography lecture.
Tuesday, April 14th, 2015 on Etinda
Good point, I do apologize for getting overly irritated at one person who posts. He has as much right to post what he wants as I do.
Tuesday, April 14th, 2015 on Sasya
Not sure who you are talking to here, Seller. I assume you are still lambasting me for my "almighty omniscient lectures" on photography. I thought I was bringing a new angle on evaluating these sets, going beyond the "wow what a hot body" type of comments. My "lectures" were never meant to imply I'm the ONLY photographer or that my taste is better than others. On occasion comments would be made about lighting that were simply uninformed, which shouldn't be surprising, since very few of the comments come from professional photographers like me.
Your complaint is duly noted, Seller. Unlike yin-yang or Doug or whoever that is, I can take feedback and use it to throttle back. Not saying I'll NEVER comment on technical matters, but it's valuable feedback to hear some think what I thought was informative is, in fact annoying. I listen!
You're being so smug when you say that your viewpoint is the "truth" and anyone who's sick of your posts is ranting. I've told you before I'm sympathetic to your love of natural hair on girls, that's not the point. You have just posted way too much over and over, saying the same thing. You should really find better activities to occupy your time. Your relentless diatribe is verging on obsessivness.
I think you fancy yourself as clever and charming. It's not working, dude, find another pursuit.
Monday, April 13th, 2015 on Sasya
I am going to have to pay more attention to the work of this Esquinzo guy. What a hot set! Paula is unbelievable, what a treat- thank you to both.
What we are choking on is how OBNOXIOUS you are. Fine that you have the opinion you do, but your relentless ranting has gone beyond old, it's downright unacceptable.
Please, please- go somewhere else!
As always, Arkisi is the master of lighting. And Ardelia is simply gorgeous, what a great combination of beauty and talent.
Monday, April 13th, 2015 on Sumati
Arkisi is the lighting Master who can bring us amazing images of Nika's amazing assets. Sure makes MetArt the place to be when such beauty is revealed by an expert in his craft. Well done!
Sunday, April 12th, 2015 on Nasbes
For those old enough to remember what a broken record is....
Couldn't agree more. Thank you for the reminder to thank K, it's a tough balancing act, and you just cannot please everyone, but I agree the balance here is as good as it gets. Nice job K, keep up the good work!
Saturday, April 11th, 2015 on Puede
First, Kira is truly stunning, and for that reason alone, the scores should be higher. But it's not JUST the lack of pussy shots, it's that the photography could be better. The first few frames start out promising, with dramatic warm light. Then it goes to window light, which is soft and nice, but very blue. Then there are too many shots with bad lens flare.
As for the philosophy of MetArt, what I hear is that it's gotten too explicit for the old-timers who were more concerned with artistic merit. I have subscribed to SexArt, hoping for an added erotic kick, but was expecting the same superb photography I'd gotten used to in MetArt. I was sadly mistaken, the photographic quality on SexArt was several notches below what we typically see on MetArt. Then I tried The Life Erotic, and the photography is even worse; a waste of time in my opinion. So for me, MetArt has hit a nice balance. High artistic standards, but sometimes it can get pretty explicit for the horn-dogs like me. I happen to appreciate BOTH things, and hope that the "art" purists will humor those of us who like getting off to the sexiness of these amazing women.
Mila is hypnotizing, indeed. My my, those full labia- I could spend all day and night admiring their infinite folds. Starting with #95 it "appears" she is pulling them apart, but alas it seems quite a bit of tugging is required to get them to part. I wish someone would make the effort. Hey I know, I volunteer for that job. If need be, I'd use my tongue. Tough job, but somebody's gotta do it.
Friday, April 10th, 2015 on Nuestra
Agreed, I can't imagine a more perfect butt!
Friday, April 10th, 2015 on Cionime
Pretty nice tits too. She's got the goods, that's for sure!
Thursday, April 9th, 2015 on Treyur
Yes, that bra is amazing, I've never seen anything like it. In fact, a lot of the sexy undergarmets you see from Ukraine and Latvia, etc. are much nicer than anything I've seen in the US, and my gf & I are always on the lookout for fun bedroom clothes. *sigh*, in so many ways the US is falling behind the rest of the world...
Not sure I'd proclaim Matiss as the best, but this is certainly fine work. Karolina's creamy lubrication really sends the set over the top, how nice when posing excites these women to the point of getting wet. Certainly makes MY day!
The gene pool is likely more salient than the water, but the result is that I want to go there! Hard to explain to my gf why I would want to go, however. Hard to believe so many of the young women are so gorgeous.
Oh, that's another thing; you reminded me when you said reg bulb vs spotlight. The light is also rather harsh, it is not diffused. When you look at shadows, you can tell the size of the light source. Sunlight is a "point source", so shadows have hard edges. You get the same thing with a bare flash tube- hard shadows. If diffusion is used, such as a soft-box or umbrella, light is coming from a variety of places, so the shadows have softer edges. I think the quality of the light (hard) is also something you are noticing.
Thursday, April 9th, 2015 on Presenting Agata Loe
Actually, her pale skin is gorgeous, I think the problem is not that the lights are too bright, but that the main light is almost in the same position as the camera. This makes for a "flat" look, as opposed to the Arkisi style of very directional light. Notice what you call the "glare" off the wood, it tells you that the camera and the main light are in pretty much the same place. The old Kodak advice to have the sun over your shoulder was never good advice, the result is boring flat light, leaving us with no sculpting of light on her body. So really it's the flat ugly lighting more than the exposure which you are reacting to, Dark_Storm.
Wednesday, April 8th, 2015 on Presenting Agata Loe
Maybe I'm going blind or it's just senility, but I don't see any cotton panties anywhere in this set.
Tuesday, April 7th, 2015 on Creden
Being in the much-derided "gynecologist" camp, I appreciate the wide-open shots, in addition to Leda's other sexy poses. I do have to say that technically, the dark look of this set is the result of not paying attention to levels in Photoshop. If you think it's an artistic decision, I have my doubts, I think it's poor technical practices.
Of course, if Leda were undressed in front of me, I'd have a hard time with technical details too!
Monday, April 6th, 2015 on Seja
I've also noticed that lately Leonardo has gotten better. Nicely focused closeups aren't the only thing in a set of course, but when they are missing it's not good. As a result of the changes, I think Leo is moving up there with the best because of his excellent lighting and he knows how to guide the models in posing.
Saturday, April 4th, 2015 on Tinemi
Unfortunately, his post just came later. Of course, it's the usual drivel about growing it out, blah blah blah. Very tiresome...
Never mind the flower pot or the orange fur. Arkisi does another masterful job with photographing a stunning beauty. Lydia is magnificent! And those pussy lips, my oh my! Diving into them would make my day for sure.
Friday, April 3rd, 2015 on Beina
Agreed, there is much more to perfect tits than size. The overall shape and size and color of the nipples matters a lot to me, and Bella gets 10+ in my book. What a hottie! Agree with bobblehat that more attention to that lovely kitty would have been nice.
Tuesday, March 31st, 2015 on Velso
When shaving first started, I hated it. I was used to furry pussies of course. Over the years, I grew to appreciate bare kitties, and yet still love a nice bush unless it's too much and covers up everything (yin-yang, it CAN overrun things!) But when it comes to redheads, I think shaving is a sin. A red bush is so rare it should be worshiped. It's so nice to see Sienne in all her ginger glory- thank you!
Tuesday, March 24th, 2015 on Presenting Sienne
That is true. yin-yang will find the fly in the ointment...
Monday, March 23rd, 2015 on Hiaste
LOL, isn't that true? It almost seems like some photographers TRY for these things to get in the way. Go figure...
Monday, March 23rd, 2015 on Dorang
Nice set, and it's an honor to see Erica undressed. I do wonder, when I see a shot like #103, why would Matiss not do more shots of her very wet kitty that is practically begging to be licked and more? He does that shot then moves on as if it was only of passing interest. Call me a gynecologist, but I'd like to explore that amazing (and wet!) pussy much more than Matiss did.
Lighting isn't complicated. You can look at the "catch lights" in her eyes to see where the lights are. There is one non-diffused fill light near the camera position (which you can see reflected in her eyes) and then he has another light off to the right side which has a "warm-up" gel on it, that's where you get the amber color light on her left side. Pretty simple.
I'm surprised this set didn't hit the 9 mark. Got a 10 from me, hot model, great lighting, erotic poses, what more could you want?
Nobody is disputing the appeal of Divina, but I agree the photography is abysmal. I expect more of MetArt.
Sunday, March 22nd, 2015 on Tinea
If Vittoria's assets don't give you wet dreams, I don't know what will
Friday, March 20th, 2015 on Smela
My jealousy creeping in here.... is the last shot a hint of what happened after the photography lights went out? If so, Mr. Varin is one lucky guy. Well he's got a pretty nice job anyway, but if he gets "lucky" after the sessions, then I am green, and it's not anything to do with St. Patrick's Day
Tuesday, March 17th, 2015 on Cetena
I do wish those delicious meaty pussy lips would part a bit, but everything else was great, so I'm not complaining. Would love a peek inside, though.
Monday, March 16th, 2015 on Rozani
Face of an angel for sure. I'll bet in bed another side comes out, wish I could be so lucky!
Thanks to Lenore and Catherine, nice set.
Monday, March 16th, 2015 on Alreta
For once I agree with you, yin-yang. The severe cut into a weird triangle shape does nothing for me. I'd prefer natural as you do, or fully shaved, which I know you dislike. But anyway, the chances that either of us would have any influence on what she does "down there" is pretty close to zero.
Sunday, March 15th, 2015 on Kimine
Some shots were unusually cropped, as kilroy mentioned. But I think it's sort of a nice art form, and since not ALL the shots were like that, I'm surprised to hear you dismiss the whole set. I thought the lighting was splendid, and you have to admit, some of the poses were excellent. I'm liking Catherine more and more.
As for Winnie, can she come stay with me for a week? ;-)
Friday, March 13th, 2015 on Kirija
Carlina is most welcome here, she's gorgeous. Yes, the twinkle in her eyes when she smiles just melts my heart.
And Catherine, excellent lighting with full tonal range. Thank you for paying attention to the technicals! (I've been a professional photographer for longer than you've probably been alive!)
Tuesday, March 10th, 2015 on Presenting Carlina
I've decided to stop beating you up about your relentless diatribe re pubic hair, so I'll switch to asking- what's with the goofy icons at the end of your posts? I recognize one as Venus, but the others are too small to see what they are (could be my browser settings)
But it means they are frying their precious tits. A dermotologist will tell you there's no such thing as a healthy tan.
Don't tempt me, I'd buy a plane ticket to Prague in a heartbeat if I thought I really could meet Vanessa!
Monday, March 9th, 2015 on Olenea
But where did the cream from heaven go? How could it just disappear? Ha ha, Deltagamma says he was unaware of it until editing- I would have thought he slurpped it up with his tongue, how sweet would that be?
Cutest little titties I've seen in awhile. Well OK, Vanessa is lovely from head to toe. Nice to hear she's a sweetheard in person too. I'd love to have been at that dinner in Prague.
Thank you for #8, I think panties can be so erotic, and shots like this are so rare, I appreciate seeing one shot at least like this. Tantalizing to imagine what delights are underneath!
I agree with the unnatural comment. They are so posed, looking at the camera. I'd rather imagine I'm a voyeur catching naughty girls having fun.
Monday, March 9th, 2015 on Emilda
SexArt has been a bit disappointing, IMHO. The quality of the photography is not up to MA standards. Any opinions about TheLifeErotic?
Milla has such a perfect body, notably her cute little butt and flawless wet pussy. I could spend days pouring over every nook and cranny of her stunning figure. More please!!!
Luca is now on my radar as knowing his craft to an impressive degree. Lighting is superb which we don't always get. Poses are varied and erotic, all in all a fine set photographically.
Yes Milla could be more expressive, but a solid debut to be sure.
Saturday, March 7th, 2015 on Presenting Milla
Colleen melts my heart, and has other physiological effects as well. Her angelic face & eyes, her cute & sexy tits and one of the sweetest little pussies on earth, there are not enough superlatives for her.
Arkisi knows how to do gorgeous lighting, hot sexy poses, this guy does such a great job with the photography. (Of course, I hate the lucky bastard, ha ha.)
Friday, March 6th, 2015 on Hatida
I'm surprised pics like 45 and 57 were submitted- focus is just OFF, not a debate about where to focus (face vs. pussy) but just messed it up, I expect more of Arkisi quite frankly.
But there are enough great shots, I'm not complaining. And Loretta is sexy as ever. Too skinny? I don't think so!
Thursday, March 5th, 2015 on Peladi
BTW, it was shot by Arkisi, not Leonardo
Wednesday, March 4th, 2015 on Socree
Oh yeah, so do I. More than enough actually, she wears me out! And she's not shaved, in case it matters.
But MetArt is about fantasy, it's about appreciating femininity, artistic expression, photography, lighting, posing, and last but not least, it's about sexual lust. I'll never see the likes of these Ukrainian beauties in my bed, but they are something to behold, shaved, unshaved or somewhere inbetween.
Tuesday, March 3rd, 2015 on Untria
Diana is quite the seductress. I'm in!
I disagree with uuusssee, I think this is one of Koenart's better shoots. The lighting is impeccable, very nice. Poses are good too. Being in the gynecologist camp, I'd prefer more close-ups of that gorgeous pussy, but I'm still pleased with this set.
Tuesday, March 3rd, 2015 on Adestra
Well lotsa luck with your quest, yin-yang. I happen to like furry too, it's all good for me. Pity that you see so many of these girls as uninteresting. Your loss.
And true, go to Syria or India or Cambodia, and my ratio theory goes out the window. And it's age-dependent as well.
I guess the diversity for me is in the girls themselves. Vastly different styles of personality, of body shape, of expressions, of skin texture, etc. My point is you miss a lot of that being so upset at their being shaved. The occasional natural furry girl you see on MetArt is about the ratio I think you'll find in the real world, so expecting to see more models with pubic hair is unrealistic. You admit it's not often you have other comments, so just be aware that you take up a HUGE presence here to basically say the same thing over and over. I'm just sayin'...
Yeah yin-yang, you are spitting into the wind, my friend. I can only think that you like the "sound" of your own voice, because I can assure you, you're relentless diatribe against shaving is getting you nowhere.
I happen to think tattoos are disgusting, but they are everywhere. No use fighting it, trends come and go.
You're fighting a losing battle re pubic hair. Can we use this space to suggest practical ways the photo shoot could have been better? Or another good use of this space is to acknowledge a hot model and/or good lighting, good photographic technique, good poses, etc. But ranting endlessly about hair vs. shaving is getting old. Really old!
Aislin's assests are well documented. What a knock-out, so sexy!
Leonardo is growing on me. I didn't think before that he was up there with the best, but lately his sets have been great. And he certainly is finding hot models to photograph. Keep up the good work!
Tuesday, March 3rd, 2015 on Poeca
C'mon vger, if you were editing a photoshoot, would you include ANY that were not properly focused? Your math is a bit optimistic, your sample would suggest 25% were NOT in good focus.
I agree with Seeleg, great styling and set here and a HOT model, ruined by poor camera technique. Also, I know there are those who think us pussy lovers are crass Neanderthals, but the set is pretty tame by MetArt standards. Fine art is great, but there is nothing wrong with explicit eroticsm, or as Mr. B puts it "close up of a snatch."
Monday, March 2nd, 2015 on Ryza
Leonardo does on occasion pull it off, but not this time. Nancy has one of the most amazing pussies on the planet, and it's as if Leonardo thinks nobody is interested in seeing it.
Yes, she has a gorgeous face, and yes her tits are great, but there are precious few shots showing her assets downstairs. :(
Saturday, February 28th, 2015 on Indize
First off, Mia is just my type- rings my bell, that's for sure. What a doll!
Second, I don't normally get all excited when I see a set by Leonardo, but this is one of his better efforts. Very nice lighting, great poses, he nailed it! Mia is a 10, but it's possible to botch the photo shoot anyway. Glad that didn't happen, this set got me all fired up.
Now to go back and see more Mia sets!
Friday, February 27th, 2015 on Termini
It worked! As a former pro, I was horrified!
Shock value indeed, it actually kept me from looking at her body... for a few seconds!
Friday, February 27th, 2015 on Layimi
Can you imagine waking up to that gorgeous face every morning? And her perfect body- I would never want to get up and go to work, she is that hot.
Thursday, February 26th, 2015 on Lioxy
Feeona is dynamite, but as said before, this set is lacking. I was an industrial/commercial photographer for over 20 years, so I agonize over that choice when seeing the work of masters such as Rylsky and Arkisi. Can't help but wonder, "are these guys getting laid after some of these sets are done?" Maybe that's what happened, the shoot got truncated by carnal desires? Geez, and I was doing Annual Reports for tech companies, what was I thinking?
Thursday, February 26th, 2015 on Seyall
I don't know what Arkisi does to get his models so aroused, but a.) I'm intensely jealous and b.) eternally grateful his artistry is shared with us!
Wednesday, February 25th, 2015 on Coredin
Dark, it's called lens flare. If you have a lot of strong light pointed right at the lens (like shooting into a bright sky), the light scatters and reflects in the lens elements. Most modern lenses have 12 to 20 elements, so there are a lot of surfaces to bounce around on. Antireflective coatings do a great job in reducing lens flare, but as you noticed in 91 especially, contrast is degraded significantly. Can't have true black if you've got photons scattering all over. That's what happened. No such problems in the series starting with 102.
Maybe that's more than you wanted to know, but that's the story.
Tuesday, February 24th, 2015 on Otruna
Well certainly not bleeding, but perhaps sufficiently irritated to preclude another go at it, which I would prefer.
"Rays of hope" is certainly putting the best spin on stubble I've ever heard. You are so biased towards full bush that I'll take that phrase with a grain of salt.
Am I the only one who fantasizes about having sex with these girls? I can't help thinking that stubble would be potentially dangerous, no rubbing around before you slide it in, or you'd get lacerated!
I guess I'd vote for natural or truly shaved.
The deep shadows are supposed to be artistic I guess but it goes too far. Look at Arkisi who manages to do directional light but doesn't miss 80% of the model's body in the process.
Nobody but me seems to care about color balance, but yellow/green skin tones just don't do it for me.
Monday, February 23rd, 2015 on Presenting Fresh
Loli has to be in the heavens when it comes to breasts. Wow, perfect tits. As for Paranov, his style does not inspire me at all. In fact, I do wish very much that Loli would work with another photographer. Even those of you who like his cluttered props and dingy lighting would fine value in seeing her through a different lens, so to speak.
Friday, February 20th, 2015 on Eyrie
Really? 38, hmmm. Well, I guess we all look for different things, don't we?
It's hard to imagine a more frustrating photographer. Here is Nika, gorgeous and sexy, and she has no clothing, in provacative sexy poses with her legs spread wide open, and shot after shot after shot Koenart focuses on her face. Granted, her face is BEAUTIFUL and should rightly be featured. But to ignore the erotic show she is putting on is absurd. Too many out-of-focus pussies for my taste. Balance please, Koenart!
Friday, February 20th, 2015 on Caresa
Actually I rather like it. I wouldn't use the word harsh, and I like bright. I always have sex with the lights on, my voyeuristic bias.
Sometimes if the lighting is super soft, it gives the appearance of not being sharp. I love the detail, personal preference.
Thursday, February 19th, 2015 on Anminy
Xena is super hot, the lighting and color balance are impeccable, the poses are sexy as can be- what's not to like?
Great job- kudos to Xena and Catherine!
Miren is a knockout, what a lovely sexy lady!
Arkisi, the light is a GREAT idea, and I love what it illuminates, but the color balance of that light is very green-yellow. Too bad, her skin tones would have been so much better if the lights had been color balanced.
But Miren's assets make up for the color problems!
Wednesday, February 18th, 2015 on Rifesi
Starlet is my favorite model today, wow she is perfect. So feminine, so sexy, so hot!
Photography: good lighting, nice poses BUT no close-ups at all. Not even close. :( What's with #105? Completely out of focus!
Monday, February 16th, 2015 on Presenting Starlet
Starting with 111 it appears Zsanett is getting very lubricated. Pity that her lips stay shut. Just as the juices start flowing the shoot ends. Perhaps Arkisi is the luckiest man on earth? Jealous!
Friday, February 13th, 2015 on Chlora
Thanks for the info William, I've often wondered what the heck they are doing to get that look? I don't really like it, but I would NOT kick Carinela out of bed over it!
Friday, February 13th, 2015 on Nerabli
Agreed, I can't imagine what the appeal of that length could be. A little rubbing and your penis would be lacerated! Doesn't sound fun to me. The rest of her is yummy, I would NOT kick her out of bed, stubble or no stubble.
What a face she has, absolute perfection!
Tuesday, February 10th, 2015 on Nidaer
Baggy36Pants: didn't use Google in this case, my imagination is my friend too, and served me well in this case. Now, to imagine an evening with Nika, mmmmmm!
Tuesday, February 10th, 2015 on Jllado
I assume "pokies" refers to the wonderful upright nipples. Gotta agree, I'd pop those into my mouth any day. Come to think of it, my mouth would enjoy pretty much every square inch (or cm) of her!
Monday, February 9th, 2015 on Jllado
weasel, that sounded a bit mean. Catherine does some great work, and these pictures were very exciting. Granted, if Infina shot with another photographer, the style would be different. Arkisi would be my choice. But I don't think that takes away anything from what Catherine has done here.
Thank you Infina and thank you Catherine!
Sunday, February 8th, 2015 on Presenting Infina
Me too, I guess that's the whole idea...
Saturday, February 7th, 2015 on Yvire
Maybe you'd get nothing done, but you'd be a happy camper! :)
Saturday, February 7th, 2015 on Nervia
Sure, all of those are possibilities. We will never know, we just pay up and we get what we get. Overall, I'm blown away how hot most of these girls are, including Adel for sure. I just think this set started out getting me all fired up (the picnic was so promising!), but then ultimately was disappointing.
Friday, February 6th, 2015 on Pehea
I was about to agree with you, but if you look back at sets done with Helios, you will see very explicit shots. She is not at all shy about spreading her legs.
I can certainly see criticism that it never shows enough of her, and yes, I'm aware that may be due to model request.
But boring? If you were there in person with Adel, would you be bored? I rather think you would be very aroused, as I would. But it's true, Alex Lynn teases us with her delights, then drops the ball. Wondering what it is some of his fans are so excited about? I find his work frustrating.
Wish there had been more attention paid to the super sexy pink panties. Some close-ups from the front would have been most welcome.
Thursday, February 5th, 2015 on Redity
I'm not a huge fan of fake hair colors, but when a girl has a body like Night, who cares? She's got the tightest little butt and the hottest pussy lips I've seen in quite some time!
And Arkisi, your lighting is impeccable, well done.
Tuesday, February 3rd, 2015 on Aneti
Erro is MetArts "top photographer?" Hmmm, you must have loved Playboy in the 1970s
Tuesday, February 3rd, 2015 on Marise
It's called bad lighting with no contrast and very little saturation. :(
Tuesday, February 3rd, 2015 on Eunera
Suggest Mr R should have a blood test to check his testosterone levels!
Monday, February 2nd, 2015 on Erezan
yin-yang is the "new Doug", sigh.
Your message is clear, you prefer fuzzy pubes. OK, we got it! Do you have to say the same thing over and over and over?
Sunday, February 1st, 2015 on Naesma
Nothing more exciting than an excited woman. I wonder what Deltagamma did to get Vanessa so aroused? I'm jealous to think of the possibilities!
Sometimes I found myself frustrated with his choice of where to focus (like 67 and 74) and honestly I appreciate the effort to try different techniques, but the B&W and altered color shots are just OK, don't really add any value to the shoot.
But overall, great photos. Vanessa being excited certainly gets ME excited!
I have no qualms with Paronov, but I really wish models would work with different photographers. ALL the sets of Angelika are by Paronov. I'd love to see how Arkisi for example would capture her beauty. It would be different for sure, and I believe that's a good thing.
Sunday, February 1st, 2015 on Espai
"Nice solid closeups"? Where? Must have missed those...
Agreed, Angelika is elegant, and yes in 104 the lighting is quite nice.
Call me a gynecologist (I've been called worse), but I love the way her vagina opens up, beckoning for lusty attention. I would gladly oblige!
Nice photography too.
Saturday, January 31st, 2015 on Rajanti
Sigrid is lovely as can be, and she certainly gets the juices flowing. Very nice set!
Wednesday, January 28th, 2015 on Soplan
When a hot model takes her clothes off for a great photographer, wonderful things happen. Bravo to both!
Tuesday, January 27th, 2015 on Diteca
She's a winner, no doubt about it. More of her pleeeeeeze! :)
Tuesday, January 27th, 2015 on Presenting Nicolina
Mia is gorgeous, love redheads (and I'm one too!) Hard to imagine her back could be enhanced with a "stunning piece of art" In my opinion, MetArt has a good policy, ink is common as dirt now, and very popular with the trailer trash crowd, so the policy keeps the standards high. Never see a Ferrari with bumper stickers, do you?
I'd be interested to see what she has done, I have not seen Oscula. But the pity is no matter how much she likes it, some day her skin will change & it will look awful, and there's no undoing it.
But no matter... Mia is a treat to see, especially undressed!
Monday, January 26th, 2015 on Dagoma
Good luck with that, LOL
Barbara's beauty actually makes my heart ache. Should I be so lucky! I have not compared this set to prior sets, so I don't know if Alex is in a rut or not, but how could you NOT enjoy seeing Barabara undressed?
Given that I'm in the often-chastised group who lusts for close-up (the gynecology crowd, ha ha), it does seem a bit tame in that regard, but when a girl is as stunning as Barbara, I'll enjoy what's presented.
Wednesday, January 21st, 2015 on Anedo
Spot-on fer_realz, couldn't have said it better myself
Wednesday, January 21st, 2015 on Sinred
I don't get the complaints about too much pussy. I happen to think Arkisi managed to produce (with Sybil's help of course) photos that are sexually arousing while at the same time maintaining artistic qualities and impeccable lighting. Some of you complain about close-ups, but Arkisi does them with unusual angles and really really good lighting (#50 is an example).
But we all care about different things I guess. Hands? Feet? Really, that's what caught your eye? Hmm, that's pretty interesting.
Tuesday, January 20th, 2015 on Sinred
LOL well yes, that's always a possibility!
Tuesday, January 20th, 2015 on Stenji
Great model, but I've been underwhelmed by Koenart's photography lately. On another set I complained about questionable focus, this set the lighting is flat and a bit blue. Really a pity, because Luna is hot hot hot.
Tuesday, January 20th, 2015 on Naqsi
This site throws so many hot bodies our way that it's possible to get almost jaded. Ho hum, another beautiful naked woman (well, not really...) But WOW Erica has so many amazing assets I have to say, what perfect assets she has. She has an inviting pussy that would be irresistable for any man. And tiny- it must feel snug and warm in there. And we actually see her vagina, what a treat!
Tuesday, January 20th, 2015 on Archea
Stella is a real treat, what a nice way to start the day! #37- 39 hint at some female lubricant inside, I do wish that had been revealed more. It seems to have disappeared in later shots. (???)
Fine set, floats MY boat!
Tuesday, January 20th, 2015 on Breza
She really is lovely. Bored's comments are lame as usual.
I do have one complaint, however. Way too many shots I'm left wondering why the focus is where it is? Does Koenart need glasses? Many shots are front-focused... let's see, does that make him nearsighted or farsighted?
Monday, January 19th, 2015 on Stenji
This is interesting. I've been a pro photographer for a long time, so I'm used to people making statements about technical stuff and being way off base. If you hate Rylsky's style, that's one thing- I'm fine with that. But "overexposed, flat lifeless?" First, I don't agree these images are overexposed. The lighting is a bit flat, granted. Arkisi always has much more directional light, which is more dramatic looking. But then you often have deep shadows, and sometimes a girl's hot bits are lost in the dark. I'd be interested in hearing Bored1's description of what he means my over-processing. My experience is these guys don't do ENOUGH post-processing. If done right, tweaking levels, color balance and contrast can make the images so much better, I've beat Arkisi up a number of times on this. Lately his sets are MUCH better in that department. I doubt my comments had anything to do with it, probably a coincedence.
Friday, January 16th, 2015 on Piasto
Bored, your name says it all. What a Sad Sack you are- if pictures like this bore you, I feel terrible for you.
Sounds like your life needs more sex, drugs or rock 'n roll. Or all three. :)
Thursday, January 15th, 2015 on Piasto
My goodness, I'd say Vikki has as much flesh down there as many guys do! Very erotic, I love her pussy lips.
Usually I'm not a fan of oiling up the model, seems so fake. But I have to admit, seeing all entrances lubed up in #85 gave me some ideas of what I'd like to do with her.
Late to the party here, but I'll comment anyway. I love her thin frame! To me it's very sexy, we all have different body types, and I agree with K, it's her natural state.
I am liking Leonardo's sets more and more. For some reason I was not thrilled with his sets when I first joined MetArt, but the last couple of sets he's put up here have been dynamite.
Wednesday, January 14th, 2015 on Medatt
Not only is Sara smoking hot, but Arkisi shows here once again that he is top-notch, up there with the best. Today's set has ideal skin tones and exposure, I should comment when it's spot-on as well as when it's off. Today's set with Sara is optimal color and levels are perfect.
But of course what really carries the day is Sara and her amazing body. Her wet open invitation puts the set over the top!
Monday, January 12th, 2015 on Presenting Sara
A few things-
1. The shirt on the head is no big deal, my attention was elsewhere
2. I agree, Lauren has flawless skin
3. Lauren is so sexy, I doubt many nuns would let you look under their habits (and with most nuns, you wouldn't WANT to look!)
4. Shots like 74 should be edited out. Nothing is in focus except for a pimple on the right side of the photo.
Saturday, January 10th, 2015 on Etheri
I don't know how Miela compares to before, I will taka a look back. Usually I prefer lean, so chances are I approve of the weight loss.
While Miela is stunningly beautiful and sexy, the photography could be better. Seems a lot of shots are just not very sharp- not sure if it's a focus problem or camera movement, but I'd prefer to see the lovely details of her tasty bits.
Friday, January 9th, 2015 on Lytebe
Youth has a way of reviving old men!
Friday, January 9th, 2015 on Gelire
Even after a long evening of lovemaking, it would be impossible to sleep "spoon" style with Nika without slipping it in every hour or so. Her body would just draw you right in... :)
Thursday, January 8th, 2015 on Gelire
Model: As has been said, those lovely eyes are captivating to say the least. The rest of her is to die for as well. I would give anything to have her.
Technicals: Proof that Arkisi knows proper exposure and levels and optimal skin tones (color balance). So when it's NOT impeccable, I'll rattle his cage. This set is flawless.
Wednesday, January 7th, 2015 on Unaltra
Doubtful that she has "fully grown back" in mind, Storm. If you look back at older sets, the trim length is consistant. I guess the trimmer is set to 3mm or whatever it is. What a woman does down there is her choice, I suspect her fair skin means shaving or waxing is out of the question. Even her trimming seems to have caused some irritation. Mind you, I wouldn't kick her out of bed (ha, I should be so lucky as to have her in my bed!) but it just looks like it could be pretty skritchy. So I guess I'd vote for her letting it get longer and softer.
But when you've got the perfect face & eyes, perfect breasts, and a perfect butt, it's hard to quibble about the length of her pubes.
Monday, January 5th, 2015 on Correla
Malinda has many gorgeous assets, but my eye is always drawn back to her succulent pussy lips. Stunning to say the least.
Thank you Arkisi for much better (warmer, more natural) skin tones on this set. A 10 for both model and photographer.
Monday, January 5th, 2015 on Itales
Agreed that the lighting is good, but the exposure is off, and easily fixed digitally. Kika is so hot that most people forgive tha greenish/cyan skin tones. There's a LOT to like here, but my point is that Arkisi knows his stuff, and technically the set could have been polished a bit before submission, which would have made it even better.
Sunday, January 4th, 2015 on Ajandi
Technical note: if you open these images in Photoshop, you'll see that the highlight values end around 200 to 212. The range SHOULD extend to 255, so the shots look under-lit and have a drab dingy quality to them. Not so great for skin tones. Kika deserves better.
Arkisi, I know you know your craft, so don't be lazy! Optimize these images before submitting them, please!
Saturday, January 3rd, 2015 on Ajandi
I'm speechless... I want her!
Monday, December 29th, 2014 on Diffone
Truly exceptional labia, I had no idea such lips existed, but Dominika has the winning set for sure. The rest of her is dynamite too, but it's hard not to be visually drawn downstairs to ponder what they must feel like for some lucky guy. Wish it was me!
Saturday, December 27th, 2014 on Flueso
I can't help but think what sex with Loretta must be like. One word comes to mind: tight. My guess is it would be a pretty snug fit, if you know what I mean. I'd sure like to find out!
Friday, December 26th, 2014 on Salandi
Yes, a nice Christmas present indeed! First, you gotta love Bella's cute face, with those delicate freckles on her nose, I'm in love right away. Then her perfect body, wow- stunning to say the least. I happen to love small areolas, so love those tits. Flawless everything else, including her enticing pussy. (I'm not at all a fan of the "landing strip" but minor quibble when what's below it is so nice!)
Suggestion if anyone is listening: a lot of us love panties, and a forbidden peek with see-through panties can be more exciting than when they're off. So I really appreciate #30. That first part could have had more shots like #17 where we get to see what's in store when the panties come off.
Thursday, December 25th, 2014 on Presenting Bella Luce
Shots like #27 and #83 are inexcusable. Why would you focus on the bed frame and leave the model out of focus? And why wouldn't you edit those out?
On the other hand, Sabrisse is lovely and should find another photographer. You gotta love it when a girl gets wet, like in #59. Made it all worthwhile!
Wednesday, December 24th, 2014 on Eforse
Could Santa please put Aislin under the tree for me?
Leonardo's work seems to be getting much better. This set is an example of his photography being top-notch.
Wednesday, December 24th, 2014 on Noodi
Ah, that explains it. Natural light is great, but f/11 brings more into focus than f/4. But to say "very little in focus" deserved an explanation.
Unused pro equipment? I volunteer to use that equipment well if only I could meet girls like Gillian. :))
Tuesday, December 23rd, 2014 on Urendi
Depth of field is pretty shallow, granted, so Arkisi has to choose exactly where to focus. One might quibble with those decisions, but the real problem is lack of depth of field. This has to do with light output on his strobes or whatever he's using. More light, and you can make the camera aperture smaller, and more is in focus closer and farther from the camera. That's why at night when your pupils are dialated, your vision may not be as sharp. In bright daylight, your pupil is likely a tiny dot, and more is in focus, just like a camera. That's what's called depth of field. The solution is to use more lights or more powerful lights, which could be expensive. Don't know the budget of these photographers, seems they should be paid well, but maybe not.
As always, I really admire the work of Arkisi- he knows his craft.
Gillian is sexy and beautiful, just amazing.
A few comments; just my opinion-
- #51-54 are great because I don't see the silly tuft of pubic hair, which I find distracting with no real benefit visually. Again, just my opinion.
- #63 and 64 would be better without that spot of hair. Either shave or don't shave, in my humble opinion.
- #95 and 96, oh my gosh, the gates of heaven just opened up! I love that. :)
The rating seems a bit high for this set. Candice is great, no problem with her, but the photography is poor. (Been in the biz 30 years, I know). Focus problems, contrast problems, color balance problems, geez, it's great to see Cantice undressed, but the set could have been much better if the technicals were good.
Monday, December 22nd, 2014 on Qulpi
Sybil is absolutely perfect from head to toe. I wouldn't change a thing. This is one of those sets that is not only exciting and erotic, but tugs at my heart a little bit that I will never get to touch the likes of Sybil. At least I can look!
BTW, this is one of the best sets by Leonardo that I've ever seen. Keep it up my friend (so to speak)!
Sunday, December 21st, 2014 on Perche
Ugh? That seems a bit harsh. Even with criticism, how could a healthy man NOT be enticed by the likes of Ellen? Suggest you take a hiatus, don't look at any girly pictures for a month... two months... then come back hungry and enjoy.
Forgot to ask Catherine what on earth was she thinking with #60? I see some hairs in focus, but that's about it. I like the angle on her breast, but really if you botched the focus, might as well throw it out.
Tuesday, December 16th, 2014 on Presenting Ellen
Oh wait- somehow I missed seeing #31- 60, all frontal shots. OK, now I'm happy! I still would love to show her the sights in San Francisco. Then, I don't know, maybe she'd like to come over for a cup of tea? lol, dream on dude!
Tuesday, December 16th, 2014 on Parilla
At first glance, I thought "oh, that porn-star look that I'm not crazy about", but then I see her cute freckles and gorgeous eyes, and I stand corrected. Wow, what a package- every part of her is to die for.
If Adele has retired, this is a moot point, but I'd have preferred to see a more balanced ratio of frontal shots to rear shots. Not that her perfect bottom revealing that perfect pussy isn't great, I would just have liked to see more of her from the front.
But overall, great set. Maybe she'd like to retire to California? I volunteer to be her local guide. ;)
As all have said before me, Ellen's face and eyes would melt any man, and I think a number of women too, she is beyond lovely, I too am smitten.
I happen to be one of those who likes the more explicit shots, some here deride us "wanna-be gynecologists", ha ha. Guilty as charged, I guess. But when I see a woman as beautiful as Ellen, I'm grateful to see all that I can see here. Looking forward to seeing more of her.
You've made your point, you have been heard, can you give it a rest now? I think the "landing strip" is kinda lame, I'm not a fan, I'd rather have shaven or unshaven. In case you think only models being photographed for sites like MetArt are the ones shaving, I have news for you. I'll bet if you went to any college campus in the US or UK and undressed 100 random girls, you would find most of them shaved. It's what men AND women prefer these days. Get used to it.
Monday, December 15th, 2014 on Risiede
Miren is stunningly beautiful and unbelieveably sexy. No inhibitions and supreme confidence as has been noted. Wow, what a hot woman.
As I've said many times, Arkisi is the man. I know the photo biz, this guy is top-notch.
I think if you are going to use words like "garbage" and "disgusting", some specifics are in order. Writing is not gswkJu's strong point (and BTW the space bar is there for a reason!) so maybe I'm asking for too much. I think this site is about a deep love for the female form. So sometimes, the sets might not be the best, or the model's expressions, but there's something about her femininity that arouses me. My guess is gswkJu has seen so many thousands of women that he's jaded, so he will be happy only on rare occasions. Pity, but all of MetArt should not be thrown in the dustbin. When I think a set sucks, I point out exactly WHY, and usually I like the model, so it' still worth seeing.
Finally, I find Leona VERY arousing. I might quibble about some of the technicals or would prefer slightly different poses, but just imagine yourself with her alone after a nice evening out? Fantasy is what this site is about, and I know for certain I'll never be in bed with the likes of these models. That's what I pay for.
Sunday, December 14th, 2014 on Chirica
A face just doesn't get any cuter than Mila's. I could stare into those eyes forever. And the playfulness was nice, I appreciate that. For some reason, this set just does not strike me as erotic as I'd like. Something missing, not sure what it is. Must be a dip in my testosterone, ha ha :)
Saturday, December 13th, 2014 on Dalna
Replying to my own post: I had to see more of Eliav, so went back and savored her earlier sets. Nice set from May where her milky juices show in some shots- wow what a turn-on!
I do wish models would not do exclusives with just ONE photographer. Maybe she knows Albert & likes him, but I vote for her delights being captured by different artists. Actually, I vote for Eliav being in MY bed! :)
Friday, December 12th, 2014 on Gnomi
I gotta guess that sex with Eliav would feel amazing! Her slim and tight body must be heaven to ravish. Mmmmm!
I have never been all that impressed with Varin's work before, but this is certainly one of his better sets. Bravo!
I was beginning to wonder if her clothes would ever come off. Glad when they did, Marta has an amazing body. The photo set could be better, a bit too reserved IMHO.
Thursday, December 11th, 2014 on Mechti
Agree with all you said except I think the fake lube spoils the shots. But it doesn't matter, with assets like Alysha's, there's no way to keep things from being super hot, super erotic. She is amazing! If the juices were actually hers, it might be too much for my heart, so maybe just as well. ;)
Wednesday, December 10th, 2014 on Tudine
yin-yang, I completely understand your preference BUT it's getting a little old having you gripe about shaving so much. The fact is, shaving is what's happening now, like it or not. There are niche sites where you can find naked women in all their furry glory. I suggest you spend your time there. Complaining about shaving here is not going to have any effect.
Just sayin'- don't be obnoxious, dude!
Wednesday, December 10th, 2014 on Ydion
Winnie is a delightful new treat, and I think this is one of the best sets I've seen done by Catherine. Posing and lighting are top-notch!
Monday, December 8th, 2014 on Presenting Winnie
Now that's what I call an open invitation! And looking pretty wet too. She missed a couple of hairs while shaving, I volunteer to go in and trim them carefully. Maybe she wouldn't mind if I had a lick whilst I'm down there?
(I always love it when I see Arkisi has a set!)
Monday, December 8th, 2014 on Jenera
I like the term "feminine valley", hadn't heard that one before. It looks to me like it's a compact, tight little valley, would certainly feel great wrapped around something. Hmmmm, heaven on earth!
Friday, December 5th, 2014 on Holde
I agree that Arkisi is among the best, no argument there. Better lighting for sure. But what's with the disparaging remarks about resolution?
Nika is pretty hot stuff, hard to complain about a photographer that gets such a gorgeous woman undressed for us to enjoy.
Thursday, December 4th, 2014 on Conheti
Funny how we have our individual preferences- to me, her tits are perfect shape, size, nipples the right size and color... mmmm. Then her nether region is not so bad either. I'd like to get rid of the soap and see more of her tasty bits, if you please.
It bugs me when a model will only shoot with one photographer. I have nothing against Fabrice, but I'd love to see more sets of Carolizi with a variety of photographers.
Thursday, December 4th, 2014 on Katale
LOL you've got that right! Yes, my devotion to science drives me forward, I will be as objective as possible but may need to initiate frequent samplings in order to be statistically significant. :)
Tuesday, December 2nd, 2014 on Navne
It is unusual. The tissue at her anal opening looks a lot like labia. And then her actual labia are simply amazing. Anal is not for everyone, but my guess is that anal with Mila would be outstanding. I'd be willing to try it out, just for scientific data-gathering, ha ha. For those of you who think "eeew" re anal, don't worry- her vagina would also get lots of action in my little experiment!
I agree with most of what you complain about BUT it's still a photo set of an incredibly hot young woman who reveals all to our hungry eyes. Maybe "failure" is going a bit too far.
Still, water shots, pool shoots, shower sets don't do much for me. I guess most of my sexual experiences have been in bed, maybe that explains the bias. If you were a photographer doing these women (lucky bastards!) you would of course want to mix it up and try something different. Sometimes it works, sometimes not.
Tuesday, December 2nd, 2014 on Hadem
Ardelia is stunning, my heart aches to have such beauty in my arms. But I can dream, and Ardelia and Arkisi make that possible. Dynamite! :)
Monday, December 1st, 2014 on Mirlio
Oh I see. Never knew what that meant, always thought it had something to do with labia. Live and learn! :)
Saturday, November 29th, 2014 on Artisti
I totally agree. I just watched her video, OMG I would give anything to play with her. Adding 15 to 20 pounds would be a shame. The world has plenty of beefy girls, but not that many who are slender and this cute.
I happen to like skinny, Anna's body is more like Korean women, which I have always appreciated. We will never know if Anna eats normally or has an eating disorder, as some have suggested. I'd ravish her first, ask questions later!
My only gripe is the stubble looks like it could hurt, but maybe shaving just before the photo shoot isn't possible? I'd want my face down there, and it looks like I could get shredded doing so.
Pardon my ignorance, but what are "glass cutters?" Doesn't sound appealing, but I assume you're referring to something very nice.
All the better for deep penetration! On #88 I certainly see some nice ass.
Agree with what's been said, what a cutie she is! Love those lean legs, perfect butt, gorgeous pussy. Sigh, if only I could touch and taste!
Thursday, November 27th, 2014 on Natuna
Actually, there is quite a bit of "fill light" as it's called. If you look at her eyes, you can see where the lights are coming from, because they are bright reflections in the eyes. Ask any pro photographer, and every shot they look at with people in it can be analyzed by looking at the catch lights in the eyes. My guess is the fill lights needed to be a bit higher to illuminate her face more in some, but not all shots. The photographer probably emphasized lighting of her lower extremities for obvious reasons.
Thursday, November 27th, 2014 on Tibica
A day late, so likely nobody will read this, but here goes anyway. I think I'm correct in saying that Dulcia seems to have inner-inner labia, in other words gorgeous pink tissue right at the vaginal opening. Nowhere have I seen anything that compares to her anatomy down there. What possible evolutionary advantage would that pussy structure have? I'm just guessing that for a man entering her it must FEEL WONDERFUL. Reproduction assured, if she were mine, I'd be going back in with unusual regularity! ;-)
Wednesday, November 26th, 2014 on Ireach
Loretta has just the kind of body that drives me wild, what a treat to see her naked and imagine what an evening alone with her would be like!
As I've said before, I think Arkisi is up there with the best. Whenever I see a set he's shot, I'm fairly certain I'm gonna love it.
Wednesday, November 26th, 2014 on Harera
Photography not very good, but the 8.36 rating must reflect the fact that many viewers, like me, are blown away with Nordica's hot body. And those labia, my goodness, wouldn't they be fun to play with and suck on?
Sunday, November 23rd, 2014 on Demile
This set would look a lot nicer if the green/cyan color cast were fixed. Just sayin'...
Thursday, November 20th, 2014 on Benrad
All her sets are with Paronov. She must have her reasons for this, but imagine this woman doing a shoot with Rylsky or Arkisi. That would be great!
Wednesday, November 19th, 2014 on Nyuso
Nensi gets my vote for being so cute and sexy, BUT the photoshoot is a disaster. What a waste of talent! Granted, she takes her clothes off (yay!) but as mentioned, not a single good close-up. Poses are just OK. Can we see more of this girl with a different photographer? Please??
Hmmm, sex on mescaline, that would be interesting. Or psilocybin...
Tuesday, November 18th, 2014 on Deluia
Taissia, that is. Spell-check didn't catch that one!
Still swooning over her, OMG.
Some of these pictures remind me of the 007 movie with the character "Pussy Galore". I was just a kid, but it conjured up images similar to the hot close-ups of Talssia's amazing labia.
Yeah, that makes sense, you're probably right.
Tuesday, November 18th, 2014 on Presenting Marley
Well, if that's her name, that's her name.
What I don't get is the title MetArt gives each set. In this case it's just Presenting Marley, but normally they come up with some goofy title, and who cares? I really don't see the point in doing that, seems meaningless to me.
I tend to notice the photographers here, Arkisi and Rylsky of course are the biggies in my book, but never noticed Egon Schneider before. Now I will! If he can bring us delights like Layna, I say bravo!
Funny, but I prefer small areloas. And long lean legs drive me crazy. Oh, and I rather enjoy a lovely pussy too. Oh, and a tight little butt is a bonus. Hey wait, Layna has all that! If only I could entice her to move to California, *sigh*
Tuesday, November 18th, 2014 on Efekta
Not a very good set. Seems with two hot naked women I'd be in heaven, but alas, only a few shots are really worthwhile.
Monday, November 17th, 2014 on Anaia
I don't think this is Arkisi's best photography, perhaps it's an older set. But there can be no doubt that this set of Colleen caused a lot of tugging to happen!
Monday, November 17th, 2014 on Medriy
Where do you think she has tattoos?
Might as well show the ink I guess rather than Photoshop, but on the other hand I "get" how tattoos spoil the beauty of the female form for lots of men.
This site seems more suited to men who prefer NOT to see a woman's body altered with ink. Once in awhile you DO see tattoos here, but not often. Maybe, as you say, because they are Photoshopped out.
Monday, November 17th, 2014 on Hodine
Yeah you are right. I'm not saying I think it's the best decision for this model, my point was that Matiss knows how to use a light meter, the shots look this way on purpose. I guess I'm more forgiving of high-key exposure than most of the MetArt viewers. To me it's better than some of the weird clunky jewelry or just odd props that are often used. I do wonder if the photographer bothers to read our comments? (Some do respond, that's nice!)
Friday, November 14th, 2014 on Tekemi
Matiss is a photographer, you may not like the look, but let him do his job. I've said this before with high-key sets, it's an artistic style, I'm sure it was deliberate. On 135 and 136 the extra light gives us a glimpse into the inner sanctum of heaven, nothing wrong with that. Let there be light!
The little red panties really got me going. Then when she pulls them to the side, OMG I'm smitten! Amorett is lovely, what a gorgeous woman. Welcome, and it's safe to say we are all looking forward to more of her!
Friday, November 14th, 2014 on Presenting Amorett
It seems to me that there are a few of you out there that are LOOKING for evidence of Photoshopping. I prefer the idea of natural as well, but the fact of the matter is that Arkisi does the best lighting, he really gets the girls into some outstanding sexy poses, and if there is evidence of Photoshop, I can tell you that I am looking elsewhere and not bothered by it. C'mon Gustav, there are so many mouth-watering shots here, and you are whining about getting rid of zits or warts or moles or stubble? Hard to believe.
Thursday, November 13th, 2014 on Nestro
Oops, it's spelled genitalia, my bad. When viewing such lovely parts, my brain disconnects. The little head takes over...
Thursday, November 13th, 2014 on Herca
At the risk of being bashed by those who hate genetilia close-ups, #35 just begs for more shots like it, including some close-ups. That position got her lips to open up a bit, which is quite nice.
The background color spills a bit too much into her skin tones. The cast is cyan for those who know color balance (or colour for those of you across the pond.) I know I'm more technical than most, but a bit more red and slightly higher (brighter) levels would have been a plus for this set.
Having said all that, Zhanet is all any man could dream for. Wow!
Miren rocks my world, and Arkisi is the best!
Wednesday, November 12th, 2014 on Nestro
What's the problem? A lot of us find it very exciting down there. Maybe you never get that close? My deepest sympathies go to you.
Fun angle on 65- 67 but the lens flare ruins it. Oh well...
93 fills my screen with such an inviting spread, *sigh*- I just have to imagine I'm there with Paula.
I have gotten to like the shaved look, but yeah the girls put up with a lot to get it. It's not just models shaving/waxing, so girls must like the look too, or maybe they do it because their partners enjoy the unhindered view. (?)
Tuesday, November 11th, 2014 on Anubri
A few thoughts for what it's worth. 1.) Azrael's comment is absurd, not even worth a reply, but some I thought were clever. 2.) Such a shame that there are so few "real" redheads in the world. But Violla is striking with her hair this color. Would love it more if natural! 3.) Seems in #93 a bit of toilet paper got left behind, but by #95 it's gone. I'd definitely volunteer to be the one to go in and fish it out! :)
Tuesday, November 11th, 2014 on Autsi
Lily is to die for, but it's pretty frustrating how the focus is so consitently in the wrong spot. If depth of field is that shallow, do a face focus shot then a pussy focus shot. She is spreading her legs for a reason!
Monday, November 10th, 2014 on Silvare
Great, it's settled then. You get the blubber, I get the lean ones!
Thursday, November 6th, 2014 on Cadro
So that she can look like the tubby American girls? I think it's nice to see a lean figure. My guess is it's in her genes, not anorexia.
Anita is stunning, I'd give an arm... well, OK maybe an eye tooth to have her, but I can't say the set is terribly inspiring. Not one of Leonardo's better photo shoots, in my humble opinion.
Monday, November 3rd, 2014 on Settima
Vronsky says "I don't need macro shots of genitalia", and I respect that we all look for different things when viewing these sets. Love of women is a common denominator, but that's about it. But having said that, you would think with all the vaginal secretions Sabrina was producing, that Paromov would have humored us wanna-be gynecologists by getting a bit closer. Even in high res, I'm left wanting more. So it goes, a beautiful girl with a beautiful body, how nice is that? I just wish Arkisi was doing the shooting.
Monday, November 3rd, 2014 on Ravole
I have no idea if my admonitions about levels (lack of bright tones) had anything to do with it, or even if Arkisi ever paid any attention to my rants, but it seems the technicals of his work are now impeccable. My hat is off for capturing such remarkable women with such good lighting, and in such exciting poses.
Lilu is another example of a fine Arkisi set. My heart is pounding, that's a good thing. Thanks to Lilu and Arkisi!
Monday, November 3rd, 2014 on Presenting Lilu
Yep, that is the downside to seeing the most beautiful women in the world undressed and posing erotically for you. No matter how much you may want to feel or taste them, it's just not going to happen. Oh well, we get a glimpse of heaven.
Sunday, November 2nd, 2014 on Parsa
The clock(s) are only in a few pictures. May I suggest you avert your eyes and feast on her body. You'll be glad you did!
Friday, October 31st, 2014 on Carreta
Those pussy lips have to be top contenders for the lips I'd most like to lick and caress. That would be heaven for me!
Friday, October 31st, 2014 on Taradys
I would be one of those who'd wish for more intimate shots, but you're right if you go to High Res on shots like 115, you can see she's quite wet. Nothing more exciting than girl juices!
Thursday, October 30th, 2014 on Xoga
Amazing how many posts this got and how long some of them are. Some viewers must have a lot of time on their hands. Also amazing how the bush vs shaven debate rages on. When shaving first started years ago, I hated it. All the times I got laid, things were furry down there, so the associations were strong. Gradually I got to like the look, and now to be honest, either is just fine. Pussy is pussy. But I think the common denominator is that we all WANT Milena, and I don't mean to come over for a cup 'o tea!
Wednesday, October 29th, 2014 on Lihaud
This set should get even the most decrepit old geezer to be rock hard. My goodness, what an inviting opening!
Tuesday, October 28th, 2014 on Lidade
I'm a bit late to the party here, but have to comment. Aislin is stunning, and I couldn't possibly ask for better photography. The end result is incredibly erotic and arousing. Bravo!
I'm also pleased to see that the murky look of some of Arkisi's sets has thankfully gone away. Maybe he hired an assistant to balance the curves (in Photoshop, not HER curves, ha ha)
Monday, October 27th, 2014 on Tenoda
Forget the lottery- a date with Loretta would be the best prize imaginable!
As I've said before, Arkisi is a master, my hat is off to him.
...and if I could get my hands on Loretta, everything else would be off!
Saturday, October 25th, 2014 on Rojada
It's not fair, I tell you. For Ukraine to have such a lock on stunning females is just not fair. I used to think I was lucky living in California. Not any more. (Although I'd stick to the western side of Ukraine, thank you)
Sigrid is amazingly hot. Pretty, playful, killer body, and genitalia that will probably haunt my dreams for some time to come.
Friday, October 24th, 2014 on Oigea
Colour balance is spot-on, I think you are noticing that some of her... uh, tissues are quite red. In some areas they even look a bit irritated. I'm thinking there's a lot of action going on down there, so some redness is to be expected.
Ah, if only I could be the one doing all that action!
We all agree, Mia is an amazing beauty! And as her lips part ever so slightly, it's looking pretty moist in there... mmmmm!
Friday, October 24th, 2014 on Teiwa
Reminds me of a favorite joke. A guy asks a woman "why don't you have any tattoos?" To which she replies "have you ever seen a bumper sticker on a Ferarri?"
Friday, October 24th, 2014 on Difume
Thank goodness Albert chose to focus on her gaping vagina in #94. If the focus had been on the feet, I'd be super bummed. I know there's foot guys out there, but they are relatively rare.
Love the naughty panties, inspires me to buy some for my girlfriend!
Thursday, October 23rd, 2014 on Coeldy
Not only is Lenai beautiful but Arkisi has done an outstanding job with this set. My earlier complaints about compressed tonality are gone. I'd like to think I had a hand in that, but who knows?
Anyway, aethetically, artistically, technically superior, 10+!
Thursday, October 23rd, 2014 on Difume
I always love it when you can see "inside" but yikes that stubble looks pretty scary.
Wednesday, October 22nd, 2014 on Latrige
You can just barely detect a hint of moisture coming from deep inside. Alas, we'll never know, but at least we get a tantalizing hint.
Lovely girl, good lighting, nice set.
Wednesday, October 22nd, 2014 on Carmina
This set is a prime example of a gorgeous girl who could look much better if the histogram was adjusted properly. Arkisi is one of my favorite photographers, he does great work, but this set looks drab and dingy because the levels are compressed to the dark side. Grab a frame from this set and open it in Camera Raw 6.6, and you'll see the exposure needs to be bumped up 1.15 stops. Looks SO much better. I know it takes time to adjust levels, but I just hate to see a hot girl and great posing ruined by technical issues. Thanks!
Tuesday, October 21st, 2014 on Qomin
I'm not a fan of suntan either. Used to think it was cool in Hawaii a long time ago, but it really does ruin the skin. That said, what a body! And I love the way Mango is REALLY smooth, I guess that's the difference between shaving with a razor and waxing. Waxing can't be fun, but it sure looks great! I'm not a stubble fan, prefer either super smooth or natural.
Anyway, what a treat to see Mango naked!
Tuesday, October 21st, 2014 on Tazen
Don't agree with your term "overexposed". You may not LIKE the brightness of the lighting, but technically speaking your accusation of overexposed is not correct. I happen to like it, we all have our preferences.
Tuesday, October 21st, 2014 on Ticula
Macy is hot, hot, hot- no doubt about it!
I have sung praises for Arkisi on many occasions, but on this set I notice a "hardness" to the image quality. It's like compressed tonality or something, hard to put my finger on it. Arkisi will hate me for saying this, but compare the skin tones with Rylsky's set today. The Rylsky set has a brighter, more natural look. Might be the camera, not sure. Arkisi does do more contrasty lighting, but I don't think that's whats causing this. Could be an older set with older camera?
But hey, I'm a photographer, so maybe I'm nitpicking in the eyes of this audience. After all, we are drooling over the girls, right? And I'm no exception, just had to comment on the technicals.
Tuesday, October 21st, 2014 on Suala
Great set- face of an angel, a feminine figure that floats MY boat, that cute blonde fuzz on her thighs and butt, and those tantalizing peeks "inside" that just drive me wild. Thumbs are not the only thing that's up!
First, those eyes, OMG they are amazing! And yes, Arkisi is the man, he knows how to light, he knows how to pose, and he does a good combination of artsy glamour shots but still knows how to zero in on explicit erotic shots.
And she's from Sweden, not Ukraine! Isn't it great the world is full of so many hot women?
Tuesday, October 14th, 2014 on Briante
Easy to miss when there are so many other places you could be concentrating on! LOL
Too many posts here for me to read, but the consensus is that Skarlett is a gem, a rare find. On the one hand, I'd certainly be happier if there were some explicit shots, but having said that, I agree that it's a privilege to see such a gorgeous woman undressed, even if I'm left wanting to see much more.
In person, I'd be lucky if she even talked to me, much less get undressed for me. So yeah the poses are conservative, but wow what a girl!
Monday, October 13th, 2014 on Presenting Skarlett
Maybe the people who work for MetArt are wanking off as much as the customers!
It certainly does seem nobody is listening...
Monday, October 13th, 2014 on Baggie
Agree 100%, rachsback! Not that her cute freckly face doesn't deserve some attention, but as you say, in 123 the focus isn't where it's supposed to be- the model is spreading her legs, the least you could do Leonardo, is take a #124 shot and change the focus.
Geez, how many times do I need to harp on this subject? I'm not alone in feeling this way. When I was a working professional photographer, I gratefully took suggestions on how to improve my craft. Is anybody listening? Maybe we are just chattering amongst ourselves. (?)
Not only is Miren a knockout, I am once again convinced that Arkisi is my favorite photographer here. Bravo!
Monday, October 13th, 2014 on Cerea
Whoa, OK weird. I posted the "what happened to my post?" and when I posted THAT, the original one reappeared. Must be I'm in the Twilight Zone!
Friday, October 10th, 2014 on Caeli
I had posted a comment about this set, and it seemed to be posted, but now it's gone. Didn't say anything offensive, this is the 2nd time in a week my posts just disappeared.
Anyone else notice this happening? I saw a comment about new servers or something with MetArt. Could that expain it?
Anyway, I said Yani is ultra-hot but I'm not a fan of pool shoots, that's all (not that anybody really cares what I think- the comments are just sort of a cyber community of horny guys, suggesting what THEY think could make the shoots better) And yes, perhaps the occasional horny bi woman too.
Yani is a heart-stopper, but for some reason pool sets just don't do it for me. But her body sure does! So as rachsback says, all is well.
9.34, hmm guess I'm not the only guy who gets fired up over this lovely young lady. I wonder how it is that #7 and 8 she is dripping with girl juices, then they disappear in 50 and 51 (would anyone in their right mind suggest she wipe it off?) then juicy again in 110. Not complaining mind you, it's über-exciting to see her aroused, just wondering how/why it would come and go? Makes you wonder about the chronology of the shots- not in order perhaps?
But back to Jeff. OMG! I'm in love, this is just not fair, ha ha. Yeah, I guess subscribing to RylskyArt might be a good move. I may get sore from wanking too much, however.
Friday, October 10th, 2014 on Iwaon
1. What TV? ;-)
2. Zarina is hot, what a body and sweet face!
3. Being a natural redhead myself, it's great that being a "ginger" is now popular (it was decidedly NOT cool when I was growing up!) but the fakeness of it is distracting from her other assets. But she colors it to suit HER, not for my benefit.
4. Thank you for shots like #60 where the model actually IS doing some spreading with her hands. So many times I see the hands in that position, and doing absolutely nothing to open things up.
Overall, a very nice set of a very hot woman.
Thursday, October 9th, 2014 on Celeit
Why can't there be more shots like #30? Wow, what an amazing entrance!
Wednesday, October 8th, 2014 on Lanuva
Geez, no need to be hostile. Oddly, I'm not a huge fan of girl-girl sets, you would think twice the fun, but I guess my fantasies are one-on-one with one sexy girl. But to call this a waste of time? I hardly think so, maybe it takes something very off the beaten path to float your boat?
Tuesday, October 7th, 2014 on Badaju
Suzanna has got to have one of the most perfect bodies on earth. Ah, to be on a boat, an airplane- hell, even on a dinghy with her would be heaven. Excellent job Fabrice. And God did a pretty good job with Suzanna too! ;)
Monday, October 6th, 2014 on Theku
Karolina is indeed adorable, but alas, the last shot was starting to get pretty hot and there it ends. Is the "tease" supposed to keep us in suspense until the next shoot? Karolina sure gets my heart beating, I just wish we would get more of her eroticsm in this set.
Friday, October 3rd, 2014 on Savali
This set made my day. I am speechless.
Friday, October 3rd, 2014 on Presenting Benita
"Shitty lighting"? Leonardo does use a "hard" light from above and to the left, then does some natural ambient-light shots at the end. The hard light gives you defined shadows, some like the crispness of this kind of light (sort of like sunlight, which is a "point" light source). The usual technique is to use diffused light sources, aka "light-boxes" or the old standby the light pointing into an umbrella. Arkisi also uses harder lights, and leaves a lot of shadows, which gives thing more drama. Leonardo kept his hard light pretty central, so there aren't the dark areas. It's a matter of taste, but I would hardly call Leonardo's technique "shitty lighting." Apparently it's lighting that trickydick doesn't like, that's all.
Friday, October 3rd, 2014 on Delisty
Not only is Gilian beautiful, but as I've said before, Arkisi is one of the best photographers doing this work. Having been a pro for 25 years, I can say with confidence, he knows his stuff.
It would be hard to keep on your game with such enticing sexuality in front of you, but Arkisi and others have apparently figured it out. Lucky us!
Friday, October 3rd, 2014 on Alpeia
I totally agree! There are times when showing off her gorgeous face is the right thing to do, but when, as you said the foreground dominates, and those lovely assets are out of focus, it's a shame. I've griped about that for awhile, and the photographer's don't seem to notice or care about our opinion. It's easy to do two shots and feature two focal points. Everybody's happy, easy solution!
Tuesday, September 30th, 2014 on Vanre
Nice set, pity she is not a "true" ginger. Oh well, we are a rare breed.
A couple of juicy "insiders" for the idiot who yesterday was saying Catherine is too "feminist" to do such shots. I happen to love those shots, but if the girl is hot and the photography is good, I'm still happy to witness such beauty even if the more graphic shots are missing. It's one thing to suggest improvements, it's another to whine and be hostile.
Anyway, gorgeous girl, fine photography, thanks to all.
Tuesday, September 30th, 2014 on Sonido
Looks to me like Kai must have the firmest little tight butt on the planet. Wow, no blubber there! I agree that the lighting is impeccable, nice job! I also would like to have seen her standing in that angelic little white nighty. Maybe a little "up" peek with that on would be fun. And alas, I do also wish her legs would be open more often in this set. Having said all that, the technical excellence and Kai's astounding beauty carry it well, so not complaining, just my opinion of what could have been better.
Sunday, September 28th, 2014 on Natripo
Seems Mika deserves more than a seven-something rating. Agreed, the flower thing was a bit over-the-top, but this woman is breathtakingly hot, so I guess my eyes ignored the flowers. Love the slim frame on her, I sure wish more American girls had figures like that!
Thursday, September 25th, 2014 on Hytea
Never have I seen pussy lips like hers. And I've seen a few in my time! Not much to add to what's already been said. OMFG, sheer perfection!
Monday, September 22nd, 2014 on Maiori
Very impressive debut! Not only is she a doll, but OMG what assets! Not to get too crass, but the way her meaty labia leads into a most inviting opening is... well, I'm speechless.
More of her please!!!
Monday, September 22nd, 2014 on Presenting Steffi
Geez, Davey- what does it take to get you fired up? Yaaawn for Sabrina? Hard to comprehend, to be honest.
Sunday, September 21st, 2014 on Zalada
Exactly, doesn't that look sweet? If the sight of girl-juices doesn't get your motor revving, I'm guessing nothing will!
Didn't know Paromov has that limitation. Too bad, because the photography quality is good. Oh well...
Saturday, September 20th, 2014 on Zalada
Sabrina is so perfect in many ways. I happen to like small nipples like hers, in fact her entire body is to die for- my cup of tea for sure!
Lighting is very good on this set, it really does matter. Only suggestion is some close-ups for the budding gynecologists like me. I had to go to high res to see that Sabrina is quite wet. To me that adds a whole new level of excitement to the pictures, but sadly is not featured here.
Indeed, Kei is lovely, so feminine and sexy. The shower sets, and water set in general are not my fav, but some do like them. I guess it's the bedroom sets where I fantasize I'm gonna be the lucky one. Ha ha, dream on!
Friday, September 19th, 2014 on Qualcosa
What a gem Katie is! I happen to like the "body parts" shots, especially as in 34-35 and 118 where we get to see her natural lubrication appearing. That is such a turn-on, so much better than when they use oil to make a model appear to be wet. If posing erotically gets her excited, all the more excitement for us!
Thursday, September 18th, 2014 on Nalega
What's not to like? Beautiful smile, stunning eyes, a body to die for, she has it all.
What is it about the gene pool in Ukraine? How could one small country have so many amazing girls? American girls shoud adopt the "Ukrainian Diet", whatever that is...
Wednesday, September 17th, 2014 on Derposa
And learn you did! If this is an early example of your work, then I'd say you started out very high. By now you are in orbit. :)
It's true, the "revealing all" shots did come quickly, but I'm NOT complaining! Lots of 10s in this set, thank you Rylsky, thank you Lija!
Tuesday, September 16th, 2014 on Presenting Lija
Gee C6, you're right, I did miss her hair. Wonder what on earth I could have been looking at? It's all been said here, this is a stunning new model, and Arkisi did an outstanding job with her.
Some of these pictures have to be the most alluring, highly erotic images I've ever seen. Sets like this guarantee I'll renew my MetArt subscription!
Sunday, September 14th, 2014 on Presenting Dulcia
First off, Colleen is über-hot and makes me throb. So cute and sexy!
I'm glad to see Arkisi shooting with warmer light. In the past I've commented how some of his shoots are on the bluish side, not flattering to these lovely ladies. This time with Colleen, color balance is spot-on, very nice.
Wednesday, September 10th, 2014 on Kanace
What a great way to start my day. Erica has so many perfect features, it's hard to know where to begin. Suffice to say, she got me rock hard, which is the whole point, isn't it?
Monday, September 8th, 2014 on Durathy
A few times I've seen snide remarks here about "gynecologist" shots, and I happen to like them. (Maybe I missed my calling, ha ha) So I was anticipating that someone might respond like that.
Bottom line is that Layna is top-notch, but the photography wasn't.
Saturday, September 6th, 2014 on Presenting Layna
I'm surprised to see 8.77, but I guess that is because Layna is so cute and yes I agree, her body is unfairly perfect. (Unfair to me that I don't get to play with it!)
Having said that, the photography could have been better. I get criticized for this, but I was really wanting to see more pussy close-ups and so that was disappointing (there were a couple, but...)
Anyway, I think the consensus is that Layna is super hot and sexy, so MORE of her please!
Friday, September 5th, 2014 on Presenting Layna
No question that Viola is the bomb. Tits to die for and then the most seductive pussy. Doesn't get much better. But Koenart can do better with the lighting. I know it's tricky when you have an ambient light you want to work in to the shoot, as with this lamp. But his strobes are too flat, trying not to wash out the lamp, but the result is poor skin tones on this shoot.
Thursday, September 4th, 2014 on Vedopi
Eliav is lovely, what a great way to start the day! :)
Thursday, September 4th, 2014 on Mecusae
I am looking at her smile in #8, and if that smile were directed at me, I would definitely think "exquisite" would be an appropriate word.
I do wonder Doug, if your obsession with pubic hair allows you to see the beauty of these girls beyond your hairy requirements? I despise tattoos, but have to admit some pretty cute girls have them. Life is much fuller and rewarding if you build some flexibility into your mind. Try it, you might find it feels better.
Tuesday, September 2nd, 2014 on Palco
Nicole is gorgeous, but somehow I feel underwhelmed by this set. Antonio apparently feels the only way to capture Nicole is outdoors. Maybe this is her choice, but if we could enjoy an indoor set with good lighting (and some tasty close-ups of those stunning labia), some of us would be most appreciative!
That said, her body is to die for. I'd give an eye tooth to be on the beach with her undressed (and then quickly wisk her off to the bedroom)
Tuesday, September 2nd, 2014 on Credosta
My my, aren't we spoiled? Granted, this set could be more explicit, I wish those amazing lips would open up a bit. But really, "fell asleep?" If true, my condolences- perhaps some testosterone would help?
More of Halena would be great, but a bit more daring would be even better!
Tuesday, September 2nd, 2014 on Codyrn
Oops, meant this to be under Doug's post, not rachsback
Doug, what are you talking about? I don't see any post by Rock that you could be referring to (not on this set anyway....)
Hot girl, it's a pity Alex doesn't do close-ups
Monday, September 1st, 2014 on Dicera
In the end, how much time do you really spend looking at the set vs. time spent looking at the girl? I hope your answer favors the girl by a long shot!
Sunday, August 24th, 2014 on Cetija
After a week of hiking and horseback riding in Colorado, I come home to savor sets like this. Life is good!
Photos 99 to 102 are extra hot because of her milky juices, WOW does that make things more exciting!
The only thing bad about these pictures is that I'm reminded that I can't have girls like Kei in my bed. But I can dream.... mmmmmm!
Friday, August 22nd, 2014 on Grynse
Couldn't agree more about her lovely and sexy look, but not sure what made you think she had just had sex? I'd expect to see lots of wetness everywhere, which I don't see here. But yes, that would be very exciting.
Friday, August 22nd, 2014 on Ujuna
What an exciting, hot set! Daisy's perfect face/hair/makeup, her perfect tits, and her to-die-for wet pussy, shot by my hero Arkisi. Hard to beat that combination. MetArt has me addicted to sets like this.
Thursday, August 14th, 2014 on Sercand
Yes, more of Nici PLEASE. I think this is the effect MetArt wants it's subscribers to experience: "I'd give ANYTHING to play with her!"
Tuesday, August 12th, 2014 on Shiya
The blue backlighting is coming from the ambient window light, which is bluer than the strobes. Amazing that you would even notice, with such yummy delights staring at you.
Sunday, August 10th, 2014 on Ralya
oops, misspelled the 2nd time: Solveig it is...
Saturday, August 9th, 2014 on Aenim
What a seductress Solveig is, wow! Arikisi has done it again, my hat is off to his talents, and I'm in awe of Selveig's assets. Stunning, A+++
The rating thing just doesn't make sense. 7.95 for hot pictures of Colleen? I happen to think she's lovely, and these photos of her are highly erotic. Maybe everyone was feeling stingy when voting today (?)
Friday, August 8th, 2014 on Anseo
Saying the mons is pretty much all the same is true in a literal sense, but there ARE differences, and the context changes, like if her hips protrude (which I think accentuates the shape of the mons), then of course what her inner and outer labia look like- it all is this wonderful combination. So many combinations that I will never tire of seeing the variety. Isn't that why we're here?
Friday, August 8th, 2014 on Bither
Shots like 109 and 110 are so frustrating. Is blurry supposed to be art? Oh, I get it, our imaginations are more erotic than her body. Got it. I will admit, her eyes are gorgeous, but there is more than one point of interest. Humor us gynecologists, please.
Thursday, August 7th, 2014 on Valith
Granted, I am fussy. It was my business for 25 years. Compare the overall color balance with today's shoot of Yani by Iskan. Much better for skin tones, in my humble opinion.
Thursday, August 7th, 2014 on Alydne
Oretha is stunning, A+
Rylsky brings us the most amazing women on the planet, bar none. His lighting and posing is quite good. BUT I think we need to chip in to get his monitor calibrated. Color balance is off, my friend. Definite cyan/green tint, not the best way to display human flesh tones. If there is retouching, perhaps the time would be better spent cleaning up the color (or colour for those of you across the pond)
Yeah, I'll bet you WISH you got "into" Doreen! Ha ha, we ALL wish we could get into these girls!
Sunday, August 3rd, 2014 on Presenting Doreen
Well pussy is nice trimmed, shaved, or natural. But it just looks a bit prickly to me. The neither shaved nor long enough to be soft doesn't make me want to dive in. (But of course I would, I'm not an idiot!)
I do love Irene's slender build and long hair- very nice!
Technical note to Alex. Dude, exposure is important! These are dark, and lack contrast. Cyan cast does not help skin tones, either. Just open any one of these in Photoshop, and look at the levels. Pathetic, not even close to full-range tonality. Tsk, tsk, remember photography is the marriage of technology and art. Don't ignore the basic technical stuff!
(for those wondering, yes I was a pro photographer for 25 years)
Friday, August 1st, 2014 on Presenting Irene
Suzanna has an amazing body. Those tits are stunning! But I agree, it's a bit tame for MetArt. We pay to see nudity. Demure and teasing shots are great to start, but in my opinion it should then go further for a pay site such as this. But having said that, I can't fault what's here- she is gorgeous!
Friday, August 1st, 2014 on Hasiru
Erica is a winner, no doubt about it. I sometimes resist liking the really popular models (my antisocial bent I guess) but Erica deserves all the kudos that she gets. Can you imagine being on a date with her and seeing all that beauty when you get her home and she undresses? OMG!
I would have preferred more shots like 87, some amazing stuff going on down there. But lighting was superb, poses are great, hard to find any faults.
Friday, August 1st, 2014 on Spiva
Nice that everyone is gushing about the set, but I found too many shots like 105 where her pussy is blurry. Yes, her face is gorgeous, focus on her eyes for sure, but there were only a paltry one or two where her amazing labia were in focus. For those of you who think I'm too focused on genitalia, may I point out that she has removed her panties and her legs are far apart in nearly every shot. So I don't think what's going on down there should be irrelevant, and out of focus in the vast majority of shots. I'm just sayin'...
Thursday, July 31st, 2014 on Jinasa
oops, meant to say "with the megapixel wars NOW being a moot point..."
Thursday, July 31st, 2014 on Dittany
I am late to the party here on this discussion, but since I traveled the world for 25 years getting paid to shoot pictures, I do know a thing or two. The term "grain" comes from the days of film. High-speed film had more and bigger dye clouds and silver clumps, so you got that grainy look. Funny thing is that in the digital era, the same effect emerges when you electronically bump up the ISO. With the megapixel wars not being a moot point, Sony and others are blazing the trail of super-high ISO without the digital noise that we see as "grain". This shoot has some sort of softening technique used, I'm guessing a diffusion filter, since the blacks are not really black. The brighter areas "bleed" into the shadows when you use diffusion. And you will NOTICE grain more if contrast is low, as in this set. Not my cup of tea, but Jill certainly is!
I'm not a stranger to psychology my friend, it happens to be what I do. You missed the point- my anger is not so much tied to my insecurities but rather to my perception that you are "dissing" the girls on this site. Your opinion is valid, I support you in preferring hairy. I just think your campaign hurts the girls, it does not come across as positive in any way. I may have plenty of foibles and insecurities, that's not the point. The point is to be kind and compassionate to others. I think you are hurting some feelings in your zest to promote your agenda, that's all.
Wednesday, July 30th, 2014 on Enbakia
This is really just mental masturbation that we're doing here, Doug. We have zero percent chance of convincing the other, so it's a bit like spitting into the wind. I will say however (knowing you might not listen) that your theory that I and others get mad at you "because you know I'm telling a painful truth" is quite wrong. I think two things irk me and others about your comments. One is the futility of your "cause". I hate tattoos, but I've given up trying to convince anybody that they look terrible. It just is what it is, a cultural trend. The part that irks me when you chime in once again about growing it out is that you are indirectly saying that they don't look good! They think they look great clean shaven, and the viewers are all in awe of how gorgeous these women are, and you come along and say no. You actually said "it looks plain awful". That's offensive Doug, don't you get that? We pay to see these girls naked, so if you think it "looks plain awful" then go away! Or just drool over the one or two that you like and keep quiet about the ones you don't like.
Tuesday, July 29th, 2014 on Enbakia
Food for thought is a good thing. You might consider WHY your comments are not seen as positive. Your message actually needn't be annoying, yet I'm not the only one annoyed. If you said "She is such a beauty, can't believe how hot her body is and the poses are great and the photography is stellar. As you all know, I'd love it if she were "natural" for some photo shoots", I think the community would be more responsive. But the way you disparage the shaven choice that these lovely girls have made, it sounds obnoxious and repetitious. And it seems you are ignoring how gorgeous these women are- shaven or not. I rest my case.
Touché, point well taken. At least my wet pussy comments are POSITIVE as opposed to complaining.
Bottom line: we annoy each other.
Put me in the gynecologist camp, whenever labia part to reveal the moist pink bits inside, I'm a happy camper!
I agree with rachsback about Doug's "infantile whining", that's a perfect way to describe the incessant comments about growing pubic hair. But it's like being at a picnic with bugs- you can swat at them with no effect or you can just put up with them. They are there, and that's that.
Jasmin is hot, I'd love to see more of her, but the photography was about a B- in my opinion. Not bad, how can you complain about naked pictures of such a gorgeous young woman? But as I went through the set, there were no "oh WOW" or "OMG" reactions. Maybe I'm spoiled...
Tuesday, July 29th, 2014 on Jemat
Aislin is a gem, can I take her home? Perfect face, perfect tits, perfect pussy, and then she gets WET and opens up so we can see inside. Doesn't get much better than that, thank you to all involved! I don't stand a chance of ever getting such beauty, so fantasy will have to do. With Aislin, fantasy is actually quite nice!
Monday, July 28th, 2014 on Haura
Were the bush to grow, I'm pretty sure it would NOT be red, Viking. There are a few great shots, but overall this could be better. Her labia are quite generous, that's a nice treat to see. In a few shots it looked like she was getting wet, and then suddenly it's all dry. Strange, would have preferred the trend to go the other way!
Monday, July 28th, 2014 on Presenting Lenai
Holy shit, if #72 doesn't make a man cum, I don't know what will
Friday, July 25th, 2014 on Taxidi
I think the "high-key" effect is quite nice with Lenny. She is light, the pictures are light. I think it's fine!
The ratings baffle me, only 8.16 for this sexy doll? I can't imagine why not higher. I consider it a privilege to see a woman this gorgeous completely undressed.
Tuesday, July 22nd, 2014 on Saphat
You got that right! They are not only gorgeous lips, but the red color popping off that porcelain white skin is SO sexy! It just doesn't get any better.
Monday, July 21st, 2014 on Staroha
Start with the most exciting pussy lips I have ever seen, the way they are swollen and red, doesn't get hotter than that. Then add the girl juices, and I'm in heaven. Oh, not to mention she's cute as can be and her tits are perfect. *sigh* If only I could touch and taste...
BTW, Arkisi does a great job here as well, my hat is off to his expertise.
You were an MD or psychiatrist or therapist?
Saturday, July 19th, 2014 on Sacco
Victoriya is stunning, I'd take her home any day (I should be so lucky!) Lots of talk about the pubic hair, but what grabbed me was all that vaginal lubrication! All natural girl juices, none of this phony oil stuff. To me, that is such a turn-on!
Thursday, July 10th, 2014 on Ekeini
To my eyes Eliav's body is perfect, so sexy and exciting. The girls here in California are supposed to be so hot, but most of them (except Asian women) are pretty heavy. So seeing someone trim and fit is great. 10+!
Wednesday, July 9th, 2014 on Nadelig
Nikia is lovely and sexy who could ask for more? But I will anyway. I kept expecting some enticing close-ups, and they finally came, but I was hoping for more. Nice set, and stunning model, but the 8.83 surprises me.
Wednesday, July 9th, 2014 on Cairead
I'm guessing the tissues these pictures generate are used for cum, not tears
hipshot are we looking at different sets? There are very few "intimate closeups" in this set, I would have loved to see more. Then "no shyness or holding back", hmmm. Seems a bit tame to be getting that description. But then maybe I'm spoiled by the other sets with closer, more intimate shots.
Tayra is top-notch, don't get me wrong. No complaints with her, it just seems the photo shoot could have been more revealing IMHO.
Sunday, July 6th, 2014 on Kauni
Jeff is a favorite of many of us, and for good reason. She's amazing! The ratings are sometimes weird, but in this case the high score is evidence that not only is Jeff HOT but we love to see what's behind those lovely lips, and there's nothing as good as natural girl juices. She must taste divine!
Sunday, July 6th, 2014 on Aryud
The tissue bit on her labia brings up an often-debated issue. To use Photoshop or not? I happen to be pretty good at Photoshop, so I could get rid of it with low possibility of anyone noticing. If it's undetectable, is it ethically OK to do? Is it proper to fix a minor unintended flaw which detracts from otherwise perfect shots? I argue it's fine to do it, but others may disagree.
Sunday, July 6th, 2014 on Sociata
You got that right! I was just thinking how lovely they are, yet slammed shut tighter than a drum. Of course my tongue would be the perfect thing to tease them apart, I volunteer to do the job. (I know, it's big of me, but somebody's got to do it!)
Friday, July 4th, 2014 on Presenting Luna
Thank you Lia for teasing your labia apart just a bit. All I ask is for a little peek inside to pink wetness. Yum, heaven awaits!
Wednesday, July 2nd, 2014 on Esathe
Tayla is lovely, nice set except for the contrast and color balance. It's simple enough to look at the levels and see these need to be brightened up. Then the cyan cast does not do great things for skin tones. I suspect this particular camera just has that bias, please clean up the technical stuff so we can enjoy the girls in all their glory!
Wednesday, July 2nd, 2014 on Kalladi
First thing that strikes me are Zsanett's intense blue eyes. But then I notice her amazing downstairs lips. I wonder if there's an evolutionary advantage to large labia? Perhaps it feels better for the man, so mating occurs more often? If she were mine, I'd be humping her night and day!
Wednesday, July 2nd, 2014 on Chilema
Usually I'd say my appetite for gorgeous woman with their clothes off is limitless. But every once in awhile, I get a tinge of depression, because I look at the beauty and sex appeal of Milena, and realize I never have, nor will I ever, have the opportunity to undress such a stunning woman and have my way with her. To hear her orgasm would be the ultimate bliss. Oh well, sites like MetArt are for fantasy. And do I ever fantasize!
Sunday, June 29th, 2014 on Litada
Some of these shots absolutely blew my socks off. Thank you Nancy, thank you Arkisi!
Saturday, June 28th, 2014 on Quedad
Very exciting, erotic poses, thank you. Mika is a wonderful fantasy for horny men like me! :)
Friday, June 27th, 2014 on Mendebal
I will just say what's already been said- Lenny is a wonderful addition to the MetArt world, I feel fortunate to see her undressed.
As I mentioned before, the work of Catherine seems to be getting better and better. I don't understand saying Rylsky is inferior, we are talking about the top rung of erotic photographers, silly to nit-pick actually. Clarity and good lighting need to be combined with posing with feels comfortable and feeds the fantasy most of us are looking for. Gorgeous talent seems to be plentiful (especially in Ukraine!), so we are blessed to see these stunningly erotic women without clothes.
Thursday, June 26th, 2014 on Presenting Lenny Mae
To answer your (inane) question Mr. :-), I can stand a LOT of denuded, thank you very much.
Tuesday, June 24th, 2014 on Civendi
Wow, 109 and 110 blew my socks off!
Sunday, June 22nd, 2014 on Icavi
Yes, Vanessas eyes really do capture a man's heart. She looks so sweet, it is good to hear that she is so in person.
The simple lighting and her own clothes are a great choice. Your fill light is subtle, barely noticeable, as it should be. I prefer simple clothing, some photographers go overboard with the gaudy jewlery. This way, I can pretend she is all mine, and we just got back from the cafe and she is in the mood to get naughty with me.
Friday, June 20th, 2014 on Anterio
Those are the most delictable labia I've seen in some time. I should be so lucky as to tease them apart with my tongue.
Thursday, June 19th, 2014 on Radozi
I like this set much more than the last one Catherine did of Vanda. I'm liking Catherine's work more and more. I like the trend, keep up the good work!
Thursday, June 19th, 2014 on Orisun
Oops, Vittoria is Russian. Well anyway, Ukraine seems to be where most of the hotties come from. Russia ain't bad either! :)
Thursday, June 19th, 2014 on Vittoria A
Vittoria is gorgeous, no doubt about it- Rylsky finds the most beautiful women in the world (and they all seem to live in Ukraine- wow what a gene-pool!)
Need to comment on 56- 60. The hands suggest she might be spreading her lips apart in an inviting gesture to some lucky guy, but alas it's just posing. I don't get it, how does that enhance the picture. Looks awkward, and her lips stay quite shut, so I wonder what the point is?
Thursday, June 19th, 2014 on Fermian
You would think that lovely sweet pussy would be deserving of at least ONE close shot, but Goncharov thought not. :(
Wednesday, June 18th, 2014 on Voselbe
Lukki is a winner, just love those tits!
On my technical soapbox again. Arkisi is the master with lighting and directs very erotic poses, BUT I've noticed lately the color balance on his shoots is very unflattering to a woman's skin tones. I took a sample shot and opened it in Photoshop. Command B is Color Balance, I adjusted like this:
+30 0 -8
The +30 is for more red, the -8 is for less blue. Much better.
Arkisi never responds to comments, but I hope he notices.
Tuesday, June 17th, 2014 on Seccan
True, stubble is "in". Look at all the guys with 3-day stubble on TV. I don't get why it's a popular look, must be the "bad boy" image.
I think some minor Photoshop with these girls is acceptable, after all what MetArt is selling here is fantasy. If there's an unsightly skin sore, I'd use the rubber stamp to get rid of it. But you are right that it's ridiculous to try to get rid of hair or large areas, because you'd have to do it for every shot.
Doug you are far from "disinterested", you are on a crusade. I think you're overworking it, you must have better things to do. Or do you?
Monday, June 16th, 2014 on Effalai
Mind-blowingly erotic, Miren is stunning, Arkisi does his usual great job with the lighting and poses. We are treated to some more-revealing shots than MetArt usually has, which is fine with me! Bravo, the more we see of her the better.
Monday, June 16th, 2014 on Presenting Miren
A few shots make the whole set worthwhile. What an inviting pussy! If a model is going to shave, best to do the photo shoot on a day without stubble.
Just a technical note from a retired photographer. The shots have a dismal cyan cast to them, not very flattering to skin tones. And c'mon you guys, take a look at the LEVELS in Photoshop! They go from zero to 255, and so many of the photo shoots have limited tonal range. It's the 21st Century guys, if an old film guy like me can manage digital, you can too!
Oh wait, too fired up over the girls to notice? Well, that's understandable!
Wednesday, June 11th, 2014 on Presenting Maryana
Your loss, Frankieboaby! Slender girls are hot, but we all like different things, don't we?
Without a doubt, one of the nicest pussies I've ever seen. (Wish Sironi would show more of it.) To taste it would be heaven!
Monday, June 9th, 2014 on Menyra
I'm in awe, can't imagine how pictures could be any more exciting!
Monday, June 9th, 2014 on Vrijedo
Carmela is lovely and has potential. There are some good shots, but too many are awkward and some with very odd expressions. With time hopefully she will relax and be more at ease in front of the camera.
The lighting is not up to the usual Arkisi standards in my opinion. Sort of a dingy look overall, check "Levels" in Photoshop, could use adjustment.
Monday, June 9th, 2014 on Presenting Carmela
I agree with all the praise for Marta, she is gorgeous. And those tits are stunning, as everyone has noticed. And those eyes, wow!
But having said all that, the shoot is only slightly more revealing than a 1960's era Playboy shoot. Can't complain about what's in this set, but I can complain about what's NOT in this set.
Could I respectfully ask for and hope for MORE of her in the future?
Monday, June 9th, 2014 on Bonade
I'm not the only one who has grown weary of your relentless drivel, Doug. And if I see one more :-))))) I think I will choke.
Monday, June 9th, 2014 on Urdina
This site offers up amazing beauty every day, but it's not often that you see such perfect pink labia, OMG. The entire Zsanett package is to die for, how could any man be so lucky? I guess I have to be satisfied with being lucky enough to see pictures!
Imagine waking up in the morning to her smile...
Sunday, June 8th, 2014 on Urdina
I'm speechless, Solveig is beyond words
Friday, June 6th, 2014 on Dayerin
Should have looked at these BEFORE seeing her on SexArt, but anyway she is a stunning new model that I hope to see much more of!
Friday, June 6th, 2014 on Presenting Timea Bella
Too many comments to read, who has the time? Erica gets my vote with her wonderful juices flowing. I'm a sucker for that every time. Reminds me of REAL sex, not just debating on poses or lighting or logistics like that.
Friday, May 30th, 2014 on Yofiri
Hey Doug, if you ever write a book, I'll give you a hint before the editors roast you- your book is going to have to be written without ANY smiley faces! OMG how will you manage???
Ah Doug, you are such a crusader. In the end I can't disagree that pubic hair can be a turn-on, but I've also enjoyed the shaved look at times. So asking for "both" makes sense.
Was out for dinner last night and super-cute server had tats all over and disturbing piercings all over her face. Ugh, what a pity- now THAT'S a crusade worth taking on, but in the end it's futile. People will do what they're gonna do.
Wednesday, May 28th, 2014 on Tintilla
I will avoid the other banter and comment on what I'm good at. The color cast is cyan, so the remedy is to add red. Photoshop can do this easily. Skin tones are important to eroticism, so it's not just an academic debate.
As for Gabriela, ooo-la-la! No complaints there, what a hottie.
Tuesday, May 27th, 2014 on Nomata
I'm speechless, Emily is 10+++ and Arkisi did an outstanding job with the photo shoot. Beethoven is right, some shots are over the top, in a GOOD way!
Thank you thank you thank you, mmmmm
Thursday, May 22nd, 2014 on Runajot
Nice set, Leila is lovely! The color temperature is pretty cold, a bit of yellow and red would make her skin tones much nicer. There are those who hate Photoshop, but adjusting the color seems legitimate.
Tuesday, May 20th, 2014 on Abisini
Pluses: Mila's amazing pouty lips (mouth) and stunning blue eyes contrasted with her dark hair. And those fabulous breasts with such nice pink nipples. Perfection, I'm in love!
Only downside: Those plump labia lips stay slammed shut, seemingly tight as a drum. I'm not a fan of getting out the oil to open them up, but I don't think you need to be a gynecologist to want to part the curtains a bit.
Thursday, May 15th, 2014 on Epitimi
Very nice set, and Nika is outstanding! One quibble- #53- #56 are ALL focused on the eyes, leaving her pussy blurry. Couldn't ONE of them been focused down there? Yes, I know there were close-ups, but just like the last two shots, you could vary the shots with focus. (please)
Tuesday, May 13th, 2014 on Lizzati
Love Indiana, but not terribly impressed with the photography. :(
Friday, May 9th, 2014 on Diminute
Good points you make. I was not aware that MetArt tracks downloads. This can be misleading, since I never download anymore, no matter how much I love the pics. It just doesn't make sense to store porn on your hard drive. But I will sometimes rate a single picture, do they look at those?
Oretha is lovely, thanks to all for bringing her body into my world. When you shoot in shade, color temerature goes way blue, I know some abhor Photoshop, but here's a good example of when to use color adjustments.
Friday, May 9th, 2014 on Cillarmi
Anita is lovely, all her assets are fully appreciated. Almost all of the shots seem to be from far away, however, I'd prefer some close-ups sprinkled in with the rest. Pretty-please with sugar on top?
Wednesday, May 7th, 2014 on Marbela
That must include me. If I see one more smiley face, I'm gonna puke
Monday, May 5th, 2014 on Presenting Laya
What amazing pussy lips (wow!) and perfect tits. Some man (or woman) is very lucky indeed!
Sunday, May 4th, 2014 on Tarema
Funny- everyone, like me, thought "oh this should make Doug happy" and several of you mentioned that. But nothing from Doug himself! So what's the deal, he only wants to complain?
I have to admit, I love shaved, but seeing her sweet pussy framed with soft golden hair is pretty darn nice!
Sunday, May 4th, 2014 on Presenting Laya
I've said it before- Arkisi is one of the very best in this business. I know, I was a pro photographer for 25 years. This guy knows his craft, AND he finds women so beautiful and sexy it makes my heart ache (wishing I could sink into something so sweet).
Nancy A is simply stunning, and the poses are SO erotic. OMG it really doesn't get any better. 10+
Saturday, May 3rd, 2014 on Druentica
All good points you make. From experience, I can tell you Doug will continue his criticisms the way he always does, so really, you can save the time typing and spend your time finding and photographing the most beautiful women on the planet.
Friday, May 2nd, 2014 on Pisina
Granted, we do get some lovely shots from behind, although from far away. Then I guess I should consider myself lucky that in 119 and 120 she spreads her legs (but in 119 she is out of focus "down there").
So yes, I fault Leonardo, don't know if it's a he or she. Could be Elle is modest enough that that's all she'd allow, but I have noticed all of Leonardo's sets are pretty tame. Such a pity, because Elle is 10+++!
Friday, May 2nd, 2014 on Brensi
Once in awhile he comes through, but in general I find his shoots very frustrating. He gets some super hot models, like Elle, and then we get pics that are just a bit more daring than 1970's Playboy magazine.
The voyeur in me would like to see more of her. She has her panties off, that's great, but the set is pretty tame as mentioned earlier.
Wednesday, April 30th, 2014 on Taeva
No need to beat a dead horse, but I will anyway. Beautiful girl, very poor job with the photography. It's a pity.
Tuesday, April 29th, 2014 on Manzana
The ratings today make sense, not often do you see over 9. Semmi is to die for, but I think what put me over the edge was her natural juices- gets me every time, what an incredible turn-on!
The quality of the photography, especially the lighting is spot-on. Excellent job Mr. Iskan!
Tuesday, April 29th, 2014 on Nyebar
Because there is so much lens flare the image quality is very much degraded. In Photo 101 you learn about that. Then, there seems to be a lack of sharpness, not sure if it's focus or old equipment.
Anyway, Lucy is amazing, she deserves better photo shoots.
Sunday, April 27th, 2014 on Spoliata
Erica is to die for, but just ONE good close-up leaves me feeling pretty frustrated. Seems like more could have been done to show off her amazing assests.
Sunday, April 27th, 2014 on Foraoise
I think the rating only tell you how much the person voting wants to have sex with the model. Not necessarily how good the photography is, not necessarily the skill of the model. If her body is hot (and most on this site are in the 99th percentile) the rating will be good. Waste of time IMHO.
Agreed she is a goddess, but take a closer look at 37. Looks like he focused on her fingernails, which are sharp, but not the face, and not her pussy. Maybe it's hard to stay focused on the task at hand when an undressed goddess is in front of you!
Sunday, April 27th, 2014 on Estandae
The leaves theme is fine, nice idea, but it goes on too long, covering things up isn't erotic, it get annoying after awhile. Takes until #92 or so when things get really hot. Wow, she has such a great body, I'm in lust!
All the debate about hair or no hair is silly. These women are some of the most beautiful women on earth, I'll take them however they want to be- hairwise. (Tattoos and piercings are a different matter, if there are enough big tattoos, or prominent piercings I don't even want to look. We all have our preferences!)
Anyway, Milena is hot enough that the leaves are forgiven, I will happily look and dream away that she is mine.
Friday, April 25th, 2014 on Hydref
Whining is not good, I agree. And actually thin is GOOD! My daughter is super slim like Loreta and she whines but I tell her as she gets older she will be grateful for the "thin genes"!
I don't think Loreta should even TRY to gain weight, she is fine as she is.
Friday, April 25th, 2014 on Euryala
(Have my photographer hat on here) What's that supposed to mean- a "better" lens and fewer megapixels will net sharper shots? I'd agree that often Leonardo's focus choice is quentionable, but your photographic premise reminds me of the whacky thinking behind homeopathy.
Friday, April 25th, 2014 on Sombra
FYI Doug, your cute little smiley faces don't take the sting out of the way you worded that. I think you should quit complaining about the girl's lack of pubic hair and move on with your life. But if you insist on it, at least be civil. Your "twat" comment was pretty bad.
Thursday, April 24th, 2014 on Euryala
Arkisi likes the light to be very directional, with little fill light, so that's where the contrast comes from. As a photographer, I'm impressed, he knows his craft for sure. As a horny MetArt consumer, there are times when I'd prefer softer lighting. Filling in the shadows a bit lets us drool over more of the details of these amazing feminine bodies.
Never mind the snide comments about eating a burger. Yes, Loretta is thin, but so am I, it's in the genes. Despite being off the charts "underweight", I'm as healthy as can be. I'm guessing Loretta is too.
In this day of über-obese people and the resulting diabetes, it's nice to see not everyone is fat.
Gillian is stunning, just a dream come true for any man. Arkisi is "da man", the photography is stellar as usual. I do love it when things "open up" down there, that is SO exciting!
Wednesday, April 23rd, 2014 on Flavalis
It's all been said already, excellent set. As an added bonus, her natural juices make an appearance, one of my favorite things to see. (As I've mentioned before, when oil is used, it's just too fake looking.)
Csilla is perfect au natural, what a treat!
Tuesday, April 22nd, 2014 on Burejana
Poor Doug, you are still torturing yourself with all the shaved girls on this site. I don't get it, you must like the diatribe, or you'd just go to the hairy sites and be done with it. A crusade perhaps?
Monday, April 21st, 2014 on Diasatis
Other than #95 being out of focus, this is a great set. Izabel is stunning, I'd give an eye tooth to spend some intimate time with her!
Irina deserves a 10 for HER, but the set is just OK because the photographer blew it too many times. Focus is my main complaint, far too many times he chose poorly as to focus, and trying to pick a midpoint and hope for the best doesn't work either. When you've got a good pose with competing assets (gorgeous face or gorgeous pussy), why not take 2 shots? Doesn't seem like you need to be a rocket scientist to figure that out, but it's a frequent problem.
Sunday, April 20th, 2014 on Anaphe
Cutest little butt on the planet! Ah, dream on, ha ha. Arkisi as usual does a great job with lighting and poses. My only quibble, and I've said this before- adding oil to her labia does a nice job of keeping the lips apart (not sticking together) but looks pretty fake in my opinion. In some shots there is evidence of her REAL juices (milky) and that is a real turn-on. But having said all that, Tristana is one hot little number, I feel privledged to witness the sight of her naked body, since I'll never score such a hottie.
Sunday, April 20th, 2014 on Herbeti
Although I'd agree about the fake red hair and distracting necklace, the fact is her tits are perfection, and all the other bits are rather nice as well. Hard to complain, Zarina has a smokin' hot body.
Monday, April 14th, 2014 on Presenting Zarina
Not sure what it is you object to. I know my craft, I've been in the business 25 years- the lighting is not flat or lifeless. There is nice direction to a hard light to her left, diffused fill light, and a nice backlight.
Arkisi does do more dramatic, very directional light, maybe that's what you prefer. The price to be paid, however is that he gets some pretty deep shadows, and IMHO sometimes the model's tasty bits get lost in those shadows.
Bottom line, the girls are the most important ingredient!
Monday, April 14th, 2014 on Piruzi
Agree with all the accolades for Nordica, she is stunning. There were some instances however, when I felt the lighting and/or focus could have been better. I just selfishly want to see every nook and cranny of her amazing body!
Sunday, April 13th, 2014 on Presenting Nordica
Chair? What chair? Oh, THAT chair! Hmmm, I must have been concentrating on something else...
Thursday, April 10th, 2014 on Metode
I'm assuming the relatively low rating is because this set is a bit tame, no juicy close-ups. But, Lusi is über-cute & sexy, the poses are generally very good, and the lighting is excellent. Sure, I'd be thrilled with more revealing shots, but it's hard to complain when so many things work. I think this set deserves a much higher rating.
Thursday, April 10th, 2014 on Mehrere
As usual, Arkisi does an outstanding job with Sheela. #72 (with his numbering system it's actually 73) is ususual, and so exciting. I just love it when natural lubrication is evident. Could be she finds the eroticism of a photo shoot just as exciting as we do!
Wednesday, April 9th, 2014 on Venebis
LOVE Adel, but my complaint is that more than most photographers, Luca Helios will almost always focus on the face, leaving her gorgeous pussy out of focus. The model is spreading her legs, sir- you might consider that in SOME pictures (not all, her face is lovely) you could shift the focus to her wonderful pussy. I really don't know why I have to keep pointing this out.
Saturday, April 5th, 2014 on Tavolo
My guess is the "high-key" look is intentional. It's a style, a look, not everybody likes it, but many do. You do lose a bit of detail in the highlights, but you also gain shadow detail, which often gives you detail where most men are looking. I'm sure you get my drift...
Friday, April 4th, 2014 on Delimata
Vikki has the most amazing pussy lips, wow. I love the shots where she opens things up a bit, but have to say I'm not a fan of using oil. If it's natural juices, then great, but it just looks so fake when you slather oil on a girl's pussy. Just my opinion. Other than that it's still a 10.
Friday, April 4th, 2014 on Presenting Vikki Mauri
It's hard to imagine a face being any cuter than Cathleen, hard to imagine a body being more exciting than hers. Wow, I'm stunned, great work Arkisi- even better than usual. Bravo!!!
Wednesday, April 2nd, 2014 on Cattura
Stunning! What more can I say?
Tuesday, April 1st, 2014 on Presenting Sigrid
Those labia are to die for. If Loreen doesn't get you hard as a rock, then nothing will. Wow. My only complaint is that there are not another 119 pictures to drool over.
Wednesday, March 26th, 2014 on Saranin
Go back to 06 January set. Unfortunately outdoors, but look at the shot from 90 to 100, and her popularity will make more sense. Inviting wet vagina, who could ask for more? If you're still not impressed, then MetArt may be a waste of your money.
That said, get this girl with another photographer indoors, she deserves better.
Wednesday, March 26th, 2014 on Odisago
Would I be thrilled to run into Erica on this beach? Yes indeed, especially if she had that bizzare bathing suit off. A few shots of her on the beach would have been fine as an intro to some other location for the photo shoot. I agree with the playful shots taken by boyfriend comment. Not very erotic, despite her nearly perfect body and beautiful face. Too bad.
LOL, you got that right!
Wednesday, March 26th, 2014 on Soggeti
Arina has the most amazing, full labia I've seen in quite awhile.
So, it is even more frustrating to see shot after shot with her pulling her panties to the side and her pussy is out of focus. Yes, her face and eyes are beautiful, but to ignore the focus of what she is doing is inexcusable.
Monday, March 24th, 2014 on Herunder
In general I dislike tattoos, but this one is pretty subtle. At least it's done well. Besides, with Mila, there is SO much else you should be looking at. So, while I'd prefer it not be there, it's really not a big deal. I'd still invite her over for a sleepover, ha ha!
Friday, March 21st, 2014 on Enirdol
A few of the close-ups were absolutely amazing. Almost as good as being there with Tristana... well, almost.
Thursday, March 20th, 2014 on Nainab
He's right, variety is great, enjoy it! I like shaved too, but this set is wonderful. Kristel is gorgeous, shaved or natural.
Think of it this way- men have been salivating over vaginas for a VERY long time, and shaved pubes is a very recent idea. Pretty hard to argue with tens of thousands of evolutionary years of mankind!
As suggested, just suck it up if you don't like natural. You don't see much fuzz on this site, that's for sure.
Wednesday, March 19th, 2014 on Toppet
My goodness, I almost think Mila has more meat between her legs than I do! Wow, that is some amazing labia! She gets a 10+ in my book.
I do understand the dilema of finding new themes for photo shoots, but in my humble opinion, the watermelon is just an annoying distraction. And what's with #94? You get close in to heaven, and nothing is in focus? Perhaps Matiss was thinking of other things besides focus?
Wednesday, March 12th, 2014 on Melono
As I said in replying to a2m2, the "moisture" we see on her gorgeous lips is just some kind of oil. The result was nice, her lips parted a bit, so that's nice, but I'd prefer to see a woman's natural (milky) lubrication.
Wednesday, March 12th, 2014 on Compovar
When it's natural, I agree. But slathering baby oil on a woman's vulva just does not seem genuine. Mind you, if doing so coaxes her lips apart, I'm all for it, but would prefer to not see "oiled-up" girls. Just my opinion.
The 8.91 rating has to be a reflection of how hot Malinda herself is. I have to disagree with all the gushing about the photography. Notice how the tones never get to black? That's called lack of contrast. I suspect it's due to lens flare, because of all the white. So yes, Malinda is gorgeous, but I think the photography could be better. Most shots are pretty conservative with the poses, but I guess that's Alessandro's style.
Tuesday, March 11th, 2014 on Puras
Barbara is stunning, yet pretty conservative poses. Pretty frustrating to see feet in focus, while that lovely pussy is blurred. Ack!
So to me the set could have been more revealing, but it is indeed a treat to see such an amazing body. Barbara is beautiful!
Monday, March 10th, 2014 on Asali
I think you might be reading too much into what you think you see in her face. I don't see 100% total comfort, but I'm not seeing imminent tears either. In any case, we are all hoping to see more of lovely Colleen. And despite the "lousy" comment, Arkisi does a fine job, as always.
Saturday, March 8th, 2014 on Presenting Colleen
I've been a professional photographer for over 25 years. I know lighting, this is not "lousy lighting". I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume your just having a "lousy day". May tomorrow be better!
Lusi gets a 10+++, but the posing is repetitious, and there are NO close-in shots.
Friday, March 7th, 2014 on Dumene
Patritcy is awesome, but the photography is not. Hot girl, just so-so with the posing and lighting.
Friday, March 7th, 2014 on Noktali
Not to quibble, but I forgot to mention, there is something a bit "off" with the tonality and contrast with this set. Gives it a sort of murky look, as if done with an older digital camera? Arkisi is usually the master with technicals, so the bar is high. Lighting and posing, as usual, are top notch.
Friday, March 7th, 2014 on Sonraki
This set is outstanding, it just blew my mind (and more). Nancy, I am in love, I'd take you home in an instant!
10+ from me, and I rarely do that. What a great day on MetArt!
Well, if the bone-o-meter is any indication, this set is up there with the best!
Friday, March 7th, 2014 on Notlar