Amazing, and once again the sexiness of that scar defies all logic. Fantastic appealing lady.
Monday, November 18th, 2013 on Jonsu
My God, at 5'9" those lovely round breasts must be epic in scale...
Lovely lady, decent pics, nice addition.
Monday, November 18th, 2013 on Presenting Viola
Just stunning. Makes the heart flutter just imagining her saying "Moose and Squirrel".
Monday, November 18th, 2013 on Primeri
Delicious Girl next door appeal, perfect breasts, wonderful.
Friday, November 15th, 2013 on Flere
Really poor use of tilt shift? Horrible Lens? Poor effort?
Dunno what the case but this is how NOT to shoot one of the sexiest brunettes on Met-Art.
Friday, November 15th, 2013 on Baies
Another Favorite, just a beautiful lady.
Thursday, November 14th, 2013 on Leganda
One of the few on Met-Art with a beautiful face matching their other attributes... Lovely.
Wednesday, November 13th, 2013 on Gimaj
Very Pretty, but yeah would benefit from the occasional carb.
Very beautiful though, possible she's just young, will fill out nicely in her mid 20s.
Monday, November 11th, 2013 on Laseva
Best curves on Met-Art. Just all sorts of beautiful.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Laea
True soft feminine beauty.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Ravani
Unless you're blind you'd be aware that the majority is politely NOT saying anything nice. Sure Cattleya could have kept quiet, had nothing nice to say.
However this is a pay nude photo site, not some cheerleader section for extremely average women. This isn't an ego building site, and frankly Cattle is spot on. There are some alarmingly average women being foisted upon us, and it's getting old.
Many of the women on here are clearly matter of taste, some may or may not be your cup but are clearly pretty. Some however are truly average by any measure.
Cheer-leading for the average on a pay site is just shooting yourself in the foot.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Pouzitie
Lovely Girl Next Door appeal. Decent photography.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Modati
We need a lot more oily women here at Met-Art. It's just the right thing to do. EVERYONE looks better oiled up, it's true.
Lovely set lovely lady. Love the Oiled up look.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Predpona
Decent pictures but WAY over played with the Tilt shift and DOF manipulation. It isn't adding to the pics of a lovely lady. Heavy handed.
Thursday, October 31st, 2013 on Marzenia
Perfect blend of fit and feminine. Not overly thin, not desiccated. Just a lovely lady.
Monday, October 28th, 2013 on Olivat
Pretty girl, enjoyed the initial outdoors shots, those were fun. Simply horrible haircut, but otherwise quite stunning.
Friday, September 27th, 2013 on Manusia
Makes zero sense. There is no way her collection of odd Picasso symmetry should be rated this highly.
She's a pretty girl sure, but not a 10, not even a solid 9 simply based on a lack of symmetry, a guideline dating back to our caveman roots. Ratings and comments like this make no sense, almost seems cruel if she's mislead and just starting out.
Friday, September 27th, 2013 on Sapphira A
Well, not shopping them out of ALL the pics anyway...
Tuesday, September 24th, 2013 on Myan
Why are some scars so damn sexy? It's one of those things (on a long list) I don't understand. I know why I like the female form, I know why I like brunettes, but why do a couple of little marks catch my eye so quickly and in my book add so much... Sexiness? Character? I don't know, but beautiful girl, fantastic look.
Thanks to Ivan for not shopping the sexy scars outta the pics.
Umm no. Red hair and everyone looses their minds. Really average build really average face.
Is everyone just being super polite for some reason? There's been a wave of really average women posted up over the last month here on Met-Art and the comments read like everyone is looking at a different set of photos.
If ALL the girls posted up receive the same reviews, and huge positive feedback then the feedback becomes meaningless. I can accept different strokes for different folks, but stated plainly not EVERY model posted up really belongs here and not every model is a stunning beauty, just isn't.
Monday, September 23rd, 2013 on Sheria
Jesus, everyone afraid to actually say what is on their minds here? Is that what happens?
There's been a string a REALLY average looking models posted up over the last month or so and it baffles me the waves of positive comments. I'm not saying that cruelty has a place, but reality should. This is a solid average looking woman, with a pair of large but otherwise very average looking breasts.
There's nothing exceptional in the photography and while she might be a sweet person, and a pretty girl, there is nothing exceptional there either.
Big boobs does not mean pretty, SKINNY does NOT mean pretty, and for the love of god red hair does not mean pretty.
Monday, September 23rd, 2013 on Denne
Uh no... just no. Everyone can be as polite as they like, but unfortunate asymmetry exaggerated by the photogs choice of angles leads to poor results.
Just not good.
Saturday, September 21st, 2013 on Koneya
Set blown out, might need to calibrate monitor during post, or recheck levels. BOOM, nightmare of white light... I'll assume the model is pretty though.
Saturday, September 21st, 2013 on Lurra
I dunno I've made it a point in life to avoid girls with crabs...
Saturday, September 21st, 2013 on Sumber
Yeah, the too dark tan on kills a lot of her appeal.
All I am saying is that I will gladly walk away from my career tomorrow if there is an opening for "Oil Boy" anywhere on the horizon... True story...
Fun and sexy set, I found it too bright, but I feel this is just preference and not a genuine critique point. Excellent clean shots, and a stunning lady. Thank you.
Thursday, September 19th, 2013 on Nagna
Still an amazing lady, the reason I joined Met-Art. The best "assets" on Met Art, breasts that should be on Wikipedia under "perfect breasts" and of course her stellar backside. Arms, legs, face, hair, on and on with what is NOT wrong with Melissa.
Sand? Really? This is where your attention went?
Monday, September 16th, 2013 on Beroende
Wow, typically I find the extremely thin to be off-putting. But this lady has challenged my perception a bit. Lovely dramatic features, exotic, and sexy. Sexy and engaging, she's a beautiful lady.
Well done set.
Monday, September 16th, 2013 on Vastra
Lovely smile, very nice to see. Well done set, simple, clean, and fresh. Thank you.
Monday, September 16th, 2013 on Cendina
First 20-30 shots are brutal, just plain bad, highlighting nothing positive. Then, the angles switch, she begins to again look female, and the set carries on. But the photographer did a huge disservice initially.
Thursday, September 5th, 2013 on Artene
Lovely, sexy soft body, and a fresh face. Just have to avoid the downcast, chin tucked poses. Really brings out the worst in her feature set.
Thursday, September 5th, 2013 on Presenting Malinka
OH and FUCK YEAH...Caffeine.
Sunday, September 1st, 2013 on Segye
Bullshit. Bedroom, No Good. Bathroom, No good. Kitchen, No Good. Out doors, No Good... Oh and Lets not forget all the whinging every time a model is wet, wearing too much, doesn't spread her legs enough, or in some other way doesn't live up to the hopes and dreams of what is apparently a website populated by 15 year old boys.
For Fucks sake mate, what's left??? Might as well just roll up the carpet, shutter the windows, and lock the doors cause "all the good pictures have already been taken." :-)
Most of what I've read here in the comments is little more than a bunch of freaky basement crawlers crying for more "Pussy" and "anus" close ups... WTF? Pretty sure it's Met- ART... ART, does that ring a bell? It is not mandated to be all vagina all the time. Nor is it the end of the world if a pretty girl gets wet.
OK, but is this a new set of recent photos, or something that has been on the shelf for a few years?
Regardless, love the shots, Anita is stunning and beautiful and a bunch of other really positive words along the same lines.
Also, I have a craving for strawberries.
Sunday, September 1st, 2013 on Medier
I'm so ready to give this woman my car and keys to the house it's not funny.
I have nothing to say about her or the photography as I have been in love with her for a couple of years now and my judgement on the matter is completely suspect.
Just in case, I'll offer the house next door and will buy you a convertible just so I can see you doodling happily down the road once in awhile.
I've got it bad....
Sorry gotta be a little crass... I love the Tig Ole Bitties!
OK, got that outta the system. Nice shots, lovely angular face, over all nothing to complain about. Lovely.
Sunday, September 1st, 2013 on Mereka
Very nice, refreshingly crisp and sharp.
Friday, August 30th, 2013 on Suscita
Thank you so much for the wonderful set, and especially thank you for showing some restraint in the post processing. It's so nice to see a set shot without the standard amateur wanna be Playboy "portrait" softening, and "airbrushing" till everything is an even shade of tan. Very nice, bold images, left sharp and fresh.
Friday, August 30th, 2013 on Merdiven
Also, it's really refreshing to find something more than a gynecologic study here on Met-Art. Would swear that many of the photographers here are not much beyond 12 or maybe 13 years old, with their incessant little boy aesthetic and fascination with labia close ups. Don't get me wrong, the vagina is a thing of beauty, more so when handled with some sort of class.
Well done Catherine.
Wednesday, August 28th, 2013 on Benzetme
Lovely and fresh. Love the kissing, not enough of that here. Well done.
More tired Rylsky and a sad washed out model. Cute girl, clearly uncomfortable, or subjected to horrible direction. Really average effort.
Wednesday, August 28th, 2013 on Presenting Demetra
WOW, Caprice looks amazing with a little more weight to her. Simply amazing, might also be a bit of growing up here as well, there's a certain change in her features, a maturation if you will.
Saw it a few times with Models I've worked with stateside, see them at 19 and then work with them again at 23 and it's a stunning improvement, girl to woman.
Nice Set overall, and yeah, caprice looks amazing, porn hasn't taken too much out of her.
Wednesday, August 28th, 2013 on Mukemel
One of the curviest, sexiest, most feminine models I've seen here in awhile. Truly beautiful woman.
Friday, August 23rd, 2013 on Presenting Catie Parker
More great shots, but uh... Eyebrows, a little over constrained.
Otherwise wonderful exotic beauty. Nice follow up and excellent outside work.
Thursday, August 22nd, 2013 on Grenier
Lovely Indiana, great photos. She's my absolute favorite I think. Her personality seems to come through in a way that few of the girls here are able. Classical beauty with a little sarcastic glint. Very nice.
Tuesday, August 20th, 2013 on Vocatus
Umm No... Actually this isn't a porn site, isn't labeled as a porn site, and has no "porn" in it.
Perhaps you are unable to process this but the mission is in the name. Met-Art... Not Met-porn.
There's plenty of sites out there for little boys needing to see vagina's RIGHT UP CLOSE, there shouldn't nor does there need to be a particular focus on one body part here.
Tuesday, August 20th, 2013 on Nehany
Nicely done. Well controlled out there on a roof top. Beautiful girl well photographed.
Rare you can see a photographer irritate the model in some way, but her tone and "energy" really changes early in this set...
Pretty girl, lovely eyes, very nice.
Tuesday, August 20th, 2013 on Sentite
Pretty girl! However I'd like the rename the photset "90's photo Cliches" if I may.
Decent photography, head and shoulders above the last effort.
Tuesday, August 20th, 2013 on Malefni
I'm worried about many of you claiming hetero status... WHO the hell even noticed the car? Seriously, beautiful girl? Hello? Hottie young brunette and you old women worried about basic transportation. Which was most likely a ploy for the photog to get his car washed for free?
We need to go ahead and give the photographer some credit for multitasking, if nothing else.
Also, pretty naked girl!
Tuesday, August 20th, 2013 on Presenting Eleonora
This is just plain mentally disabled. This is not the place for adolescent little boy fantasies. Nobody wants to read this, get a clue.
Tuesday, August 20th, 2013 on Kosmosa
Stunning girl, well photographed and OMFG a Smile... Pure madness, a smile on a model at Met-Art.
Very Nice, beautiful "real" girl, the photographer disappears, and it's a pretty girl in the woods.
Tuesday, August 20th, 2013 on Espaziora
Rylsky is over-rated and formulaic. Cannot imagine why you'd want to see yet another over processed, over hyped set.
This set is wonderful though, classic beauty without hours spent on adolescent legs spread pics.
Tuesday, August 20th, 2013 on Presenting Ruzanna
Yet another joyless, life sucks photo set. If I want to see a bitchy, put out woman scowling at me I'll head to the local hipster cafe'. It's just poor form, there's room for happy, fun, and friendly here.
This constant scowl shit is tired and typical.
Tuesday, August 20th, 2013 on Pantai
Very pretty and I love the ages given here on Met-Art... She's 21 just like lead floats in water.
Tuesday, August 20th, 2013 on Premye
Cute and pretty sure, but the deranged lip "pose" AKA Duckface, has to stop. Looks silly, and she would look so much better, as would all the models with the occasional smile instead of the horribly coached "duh" face.
It's not sexy, it varies between angry, smelled something bad, and bored... or maybe mental.
SMILE! What is so wrong with smiles on beautiful naked girls, photogs need to pull their heads out.
Monday, August 19th, 2013 on Karreh
Pay attention to just about every model and every set you see. All the girls are on tip toes most of the time. It perks up the butt just like heals. It's extremely common.
Tuesday, August 13th, 2013 on Nalika
Anita is awesome, truly a beauty. However, the makeup is or was horribly done. Anita is fair skinned and its terrific, there is no need to attempt to create a tan... Results in a really poor look.
But as I said Anita is smoking hot as always.
"Sunshine"... Of course is who I meant, not the set title.
Monday, August 5th, 2013 on Meyve
Smiles are a good thing, gets really tired, all the stern faced images. If I want to see angry women I can just go sit in traffic. SO, how about some variety?
Are men afraid of smiling women? Is this really "SERIOUS" business? I don't think so, but it does get really old.
Meyve looks irritated the entire set, angry, cold, dispassionate. Beautiful model, but if she were on my set all day and couldn't get anything other than cold dispassion out of her she would be on her way home.
Great shots, just angry looking.
Rylsky's post processing is slowly improving, from a completely plastic aesthetic to mere "Playboy" vanilla. That's to say his photography is somewhat formulaic and predictable but technically sound. Historically it's been the heavy handed post processing that left him lagging behind. An apparent overwhelming desire for smooth perfection as apposed to fixing minor defects.
This is a better submission, while still overly processed to the point of distraction his masterful use of the lens and chosen poses in this case have really presented a model with significant asymmetry a photo set to be proud of.
Tuesday, July 30th, 2013 on Oiche
I saw crappy ink and thought "this gal must be American" then I realized who I was looking at and where she's from. It's a bummer when the ink is so bad, just typical "I'm an induhvidual, you can tell by my ink". Yes you are unique, just like everyone else.
Otherwise pretty girl, just sorta typical really, nothing interesting, pretty much know everything I need to know about her from the ghetto ink.
Friday, June 21st, 2013 on Anasazi
True Classic Beauty, lovely.
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Epulosi
Yeah looking closer she's really screwed up and this photographer just went the fuck along with it.
Bravo Sir, real genuine scumbag posting these photos. No way anyone could be oblivious to her state of health when it's so apparent in the pictures.
Saturday, June 1st, 2013 on Explotar
Actually I am willing to bet that if someone doesn't get her off the drugs this will be about the last time we see or hear of her alive. I've seen it before, the skin tone, the pock marks, the weight loss, dead hair, and dead eyes.
A combo of Pills, meth, heroin, cocaine, and some sick old 40 something taking advantage giving orders.
Yeah, it's unfortunate when someone has a tattoo that is so bad that it seems to indicate a lack of mental capacity. Bad ink is everywhere, but bad ink of this size and subject matter? . It's relevant because it says so much about her as a person, about her decision making. She goes from "really pretty" to move along nothing to see here in seconds.
Thursday, May 30th, 2013 on Oscula
OK, no one else has said it. DIBS. :-)
Thursday, May 30th, 2013 on Presenting Halena
OK, so given that some of the photographers may actually view the commentary posted here (never thought any would) I'd like to go ahead and apologize for my over the top review.
While I do feel there is machinery at work with Koenart, and I'll stand by a bit of vanilla, and photo's that tend towards the soft and over-processed the rest of my "opinion" above is over the top and simply unnecessary.
Monday, May 27th, 2013 on Drastiko
Catherine, I apologize for my rather harsh words. I had not yet found any of the Met-Art photographers actually posting here. Had I thought that you may actually see my comment I would have been far more gracious, chosen my words more carefully and expressed an understanding of the huge amount of work that goes into any shoot.
Monday, May 27th, 2013 on Presenting Caroline
YES YES, Too harsh certainly. Had I thought for a moment that the ANY of the photographer submissions were actually going to be reviewed by the photographer I would have have toned my language and opinion down a bit. Used my inside voice if you will.
Klownart, is proof that sometimes the talent-less hack, can scrape through and manage a living. Met-Art's parent company seems to believe he is worthwhile, so he's rewarded everyone suffers.
No art, no eye, horrible post processing, myopic, and worse than all this, boring, typical, and vanilla.
PLEASE somebody vote this photographer off the island. He should be shooting t-shirts and lawn furniture for Wal-Mart, not producing average photos of beautiful women.
Horrible pictures of a pretty girl. Simple as that, Catherine let this one get outta hand. ANY background/lighting that is turning your subject green is a fail... Just sloppy, certainly it could be argued that it was artistic expression, but that would make the failure much worse. The make up, the error with the models age, capped off with the horrible lighting, is just poor photography, would be ashamed to put my name on it.
Poor showing for a very pretty girl her first time here.
Love the model, pretty, natural, and would be fresh looking if not for the horrible green cast.
Sunday, May 26th, 2013 on Presenting Caroline
She reminds me of Milla Jovovich when she was younger. Only Indiana is prettier, and built better. My god if she's at all smart she could write her own ticket...
Thursday, May 9th, 2013 on Indiana A
Absolutely amazing, one of the most beautiful women here on Met-Art or anywhere else for that matter. Just amazing.
Very Pretty, Distinctive features, lovely. Photography only OK.
Tuesday, May 7th, 2013 on Presenting Hilary
More crap photos from Rylsky, should seriously stick to product photos.
Monday, May 6th, 2013 on Sorto
A beautiful Russian "girl next door". Love her.
Monday, May 6th, 2013 on Giovane
Koenart once again demonstrates an almost academic heavy handedness with photo shop... Amateur effort, beautiful model.
Sunday, May 5th, 2013 on Chelona
Amazing eyes. And uh... of course lovely.
Friday, May 3rd, 2013 on Plume
Damn, love her look, just overall... Wonderful!
Thursday, May 2nd, 2013 on Presenting Anett
Beautiful lady, poor photography
Tuesday, April 30th, 2013 on Zavolia
Horrible photos of a beautiful girl.
Saturday, April 27th, 2013 on Presenting Saju
Rylsky is a hack, but Pammie likely has the best body on Met-Art. This set isn't bad for Rylsky, but his work is too heavily processed, and there is the ever present lack of creativity.
Saturday, April 27th, 2013 on Staar
She's got some City miles on her that were not present in previous shoots. Something bad has happened to her.
Saturday, April 27th, 2013 on Stimuli
She is special, something in her facial features. Very alluring.
Saturday, April 27th, 2013 on Feronia
Proof that asymmetry can be a great thing...
Monday, April 22nd, 2013 on Permata
Lovely, strong, and a true beauty.
Sunday, April 14th, 2013 on Elsa A
Lovely, Classic features, very much a woman's build. Nice.
Sunday, April 14th, 2013 on Presenting Elsa
Never found a particular facial feature so distracting, never thought it could sway me one way or the other. However, just cannot get around it, tried looking at it as adding character, but nope, just not right.
Stellar, accept for that one thing, just too distracting.
Friday, April 12th, 2013 on Renvoi
She looks pretty damn symmetrical to me.
Saturday, September 6th, 2014 on Sapphira A
U sir... are fuckin trippin. But to each his own. Ur fav girls probably dont look good to me either but sapphira kills. I wish I could find something bad to say about her. But no
Sunday, July 6th, 2014 on Sapphira A
Looks like you're in a small minority here, son.
Wednesday, June 11th, 2014 on Sapphira A
Who cares what the background is when there's a gorgeous woman in the picture?
Elenora could model wearing a garbage bag and she'd still be SMOKING HOTTT!!!! to me:)
Friday, May 9th, 2014 on Presenting Eleonora
Just out of curiosity, why would you be imagining her saying moose and sqirrel?
Am I missing a cultural reference?
Sorry, Rev, you're wrong. I try to avoid telling people this, but in this case, you are simply wrong.
There is no such thing as "average."
Sexuality and sexual attraction is a very subjective and private thing; the woman who is unattractive to person # 1 is person # 2's sexual fantasy.
Certainly there is such a thing as "conventional beauty" and there is such a thing as what fashion designers think of as beauty, but there is so much more to sexuality than that.
I for one love the fact that on MA the photographers get the choice of who they want to photograph. Do I always agree that their choice is a great one? Obviously not. But I'd far rather have the diversity and variety we see here on MA than an assortment of women who look very much like each other.
That applies to complexion, skin color, hair color and style and length, makeup (or lack thereof) and physical type.
I think that what most MA photographers go for, and most members respond to, is the models' personality coming through the pictures and I think that in that respect this particular set is a success.
Friday, November 8th, 2013 on Pouzitie
I understand what you are saying....and I agree with a good portion of it.
The only time I ever respond to a comment like the one you mentioned is simply to state that the model may read their post.
Why write a hurtful comment....what is the point?
There are many models I'm not a big fan of (some quite popular), but I realize everyone has a different opinion....so I don't comment on these models at all.
Are you saying that people should make negative comments to avoid making the feedback "meaningless"? Then you haven't read some of the caustic remarks made for other galleries. Some are downright nasty!
As far as Kloe goes, not everyone is looking for Marilyn Monroe in these models. "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder", "one man's meat is another man's poison" and as you said, "different strokes for different folks". The fact that I find Kloe to be very close to my idea of a perfect figure, doesn't and shouldn't deter others from finding her "average" or worse.
For me, I think I'm in love! I have been since her first gallery. What she's like to talk to is known only by those associate with her on a personal level. She might sound like a raving lunatic for all I know.
Am I being "super polite"? Maybe, but I prefer to think of me as being just plain horny!
Tuesday, October 29th, 2013 on Sheria
Haircut? Question of taste at it's hardest. Always impossible to discuss.
I wish you would comment more often. I have seen very few sets that are exceptional lately. But a good number rave... Very few comments are actual real critiques. And apparently a good number only use 9 or 10's to vote, thus the ratings get useless. And our really good/great models from the days ratings actually were somewhat valid just keep drooping down the "top list" e.g. Suzi Carina, Paloma, and even Ariel Piper Fawn. Makes no sense to me...
Hi Revlis335 ) Thank you very much) Nice to read such words.
My thoughts too, Eleonora looks fantastic.....hell with the car! If the girl looks beautiful, I could care less if she's wearing a garbage bag.
Eleonora is #2 or #3 on my list. She's a gorgeous young lady with an amazing smile, a pretty face, and a fabulous body.
I hope she's around for a long, long, long, time.
Sunday, September 15th, 2013 on Presenting Eleonora
Yeah -- !
I enjoy a good "rant" -- really.
It usually looks best right before some other guy punches your lights out. ;->
For the record --
Bathroom sets do nothing for me.
AND -- I've seen so much of Rylsky's "wet-dog" women on this site that it wouldn't break my heart if I NEVER saw another wet woman for the rest of my life! I've made love in a shower, a pool, and a bathtub -- they're all much overrated.
Such negativity! ;(
Comment o' the Day!
Nice rant mate and I couldn't agree more with you.
Agreed. This is maybe the best I've seen her. perfect location choice as well. Beautiful girl. amazing body. sensual poses. very arousing set. Thanks for sharing your self with us Caprice.
Demetra does seem a little shy and uncomfortable (clearly not "sad") especially at first. How is this horrible direction? Could any "direction" erase feelings from the model? She is human!
She does seem to open up more as the set progresses and ends up with a shot of her cute smiling face. Maybe next time she will be more at ease. Not because of direction but by gaining experience.
I must agree that this was not the best day in her life. We tried to change and make what we can, but if you see her expression as sad or no good - it is my fault.
Thank you very much Revlis335) I agree with you. Is it luck when you manage to do its work. Success depends entirely on models. Thank you)
Thanks Revlis335) Gabriel sorry for her eyebrows))
Saturday, August 24th, 2013 on Grenier
Umm, no. The word "Pornography" is derived from two Greek words, meaning erotic love and drawing (the ancient Greeks didn't have cameras). So, this is definitely a porn site.
If you look at the non-members' home-page, you will see that almost every set is advertised by a picture of the model with her legs apart. This is what pulls in the customers.
The site also aspires to offer a high standard of photography. Generally it succeeds in this, but I can't help feeling that many customers must be disappointed by the scarcity of open-leg shots when they become members. The reality often doesn't match the advertising.
From your comments, I presume you didn't like Genoveffa set. Your loss.
Thursday, August 22nd, 2013 on Nehany
Wednesday, August 21st, 2013 on Presenting Ruzanna
Most likely she´s got haemorrhoids or something,it hurts a lotThe seller
Wednesday, August 21st, 2013 on Pantai
Checkout her set on Rylsky art under the name Dianda and you will see her in a whole new light. When she smiles it changes everything and Rylsky knows how to coach those smiles out.
Wednesday, August 21st, 2013 on Karreh
No one says she is 21. If you look it says age when first shot. There is no way to keep up with actual ages since you might be looking at a set submitted 2 or 3 years ago.
Wednesday, August 21st, 2013 on Premye
And extremely unnecessary!
Revlis335, to tell the truth - having got to know Sunshine during our shootings - I would say that this is a smiling set... There are models for whom smiling is an effort for a number of reasons, and sometimes it's better to let them express themselves in their most natural way rather than forcing them to fake smiles, which are probably more unacceptable. Let's say that a light smile from time to time can be interpreted as a sign of real good mood in that particular moment/pose, considering that someone smiling for the whole 45/60 minutes of the set is not normal or natural, unless the model has a real attitude in smiling all the time and appearing natural (and we have many examples here on Metart). Let's say that if Sunshine forced herself to smile all the time in a way it would have reminded me of those synchronized swim performers, who look anything but natural in their efforts. Anyway, that day she was a bit tired and the next shooting she had a light headache...;) Models....
Big thanks for reviewing of my "post processing", but updates of Rylsky@MetArt is a mix of my sets made and retouched in 2006-2013 in order you'll never know. the lates sets maybe 2008 and 1 day after it is from 2013, and then it is maybe 2010....etc.
How about a young Jodie Foster ?
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Indiana A
I can imagine that being young in the industry there is a good chance of drug use, but more likely the pressure of needing to look skinny for beauty sake of being a model is a more reasonable assumption. Maybe she likes herself petite and wants to stay that way. As for any possible drug influence, it is more likely that her condition started long before this shoot and is a result of a combo of peer pressure from abusive, self-centered, ignorant,punk-ass 20 somethings. Revilis, don't hate...youll live longer. Maybe to 40
Regarding the photographer, could use a lesson in depth-of-field and use a shorter f-stop. Focus on the tits or belly and get both lips and lips in well-defined
A sad prospect Revlis. Perhaps it is just a menstrual cycle issue. Lets hope so for her sake. The photograhper was certainly having issues here. Maybe he was off the planet, thereby explaining the cr*p focus, poor framing and static perspective.
Ha and damn it!
Hi Cheers) you wrote that thought, without trying to hide behind words the thoughts. For me it was valuable to read the sincere comment. I will be glad to read and respond to your comments)
Hi Revlis335)) It is good that you openly express the opinion. It is useful for me)
)) Hi Revlis335 . I think, this set isn't so successful. It objectively. Looking at this set, I see as it isn't necessary to work. This set for me a lesson.
and you could do it better? it is easy to criticize, Lets see your name on some fabulous sets. Then i might respect your opinion.
What creativity you wanted to see?
Sunday, May 5th, 2013 on Staar
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.