Me too. I dislike seeing a model step out of her dress and is totally naked. No matter what happens next, there are only three shots left. Standing naked, sitting naked and sitting legs spread and naked.
Women are the Mistresses of the tease, torment and tantalizing.
Without panties and bra she has nothing to tease with. She's just another naked female being photographed naked, for big bucks.
Thursday, November 9th, 2017 on Porena
Very glib Willis. Very droll and Very Funny. I love this comment:)
There seem to be a few sad-asses who are sorry they couldn't think of a clever repartee:)
At last some common sense about EN-ESSE!!
Someone in recent memory (it wasn't me) wrote scathingly about Schons' lack of Erotic content in her sets.
Dear, Sweet Rose very quickly advised us that Schon does not like shooting "Vulgarity"!!!
So I asked myself, "what the hell is Vulgar about the naked female form?" I could think of nothing, so I took it a step further and grabbed my Lexicon on Porn.
I found the word used briefly under the headings of Pedophilia & Child Abuse and again under Bestiality.
It is my opinion that Schon is getting paid for her hypocrisy at our expense.
And knowing my Hard-Earned dollar is helping pay for her tripe, gives me the shits. Literally!!
It seems to me an indictment of the work ethics of some snappers who have complained of over-work in continually submitting 120+ images per set. They claim the task is too tiring(??)!!
One photographer, who also has a site of his own to maintain here, posted 160+ images of his model, then followed that with a set of 148 images.
I agree with you guys who say the sets of 80 snaps, never seem to reach a conclusion. And I'm not just talking about Gerda.
Since the the introduction of the 80 snap sets, all seem to have been aborted mid-stride, which for those of us with a true appreciation of the beauty that made this site unique, is frustrating and annoying.
Arkisi is not the only one to have left a set "up-in-the-air".
That said, the 80 image sets are a lot quicker to work with, but for This subscriber, I'd rather spend my time and enjoyment on a full set, rather than an aborted set that leaves me hanging.....
Saturday, October 28th, 2017 on Fias
Thank you Rose, for your beautifully written article on Katie A and to Frank, your historian. (I could have told you all that if you'd asked:)
I am a great fan of Katie and greatly disappointed in the fact no one has taken the time, or have not been interested in working in video with her.
The other thing about her sets - I'm not a big fan of girl/girl sets and found the threesome almost boring. My view is a beauty such as Katie is perfection in her solo work, but with others around her the center of attention, which rightfully hers is removed to a certain degree. If the other girls were pug-ugly, (they're not), but if they were pug-ugly I would not have been distracted from Katie at all. As it was, I'm more confused about the sets than disappointed.
Long May She Reign, and if her desire to become a nurse, I'll be booking a bed in her hospital. Bugger the consequences, I love the way she makes my heart beat. I'll live for decades:)
But I hope she remains loyal to her fans and continues her association with Arkisi and Alex.
To Katie, may I say there are many beautiful women at Met-Art, but you are one of the few Perfect 10's. Thank you for sharing your beauty and femininity.
Wednesday, October 25th, 2017 on The MetArt 50+ Club: Katie A
Welcome Ella and Thank you for sharing your beauty with us, so enthusiastically.
One notable thing about Arkisi, he has an enviable talent to relax his model to her situation. He is an artist and master of his craft.
This set deserves nothing less than a AAA+ for both model and photographer.
I hope you continue to work together and we get to see your beauty shine for many years.
Wednesday, October 25th, 2017 on Presenting Ella Green
Standards of excellence have certainly reached the bottom since I retired 15 years ago. Photographers used to be proud of the work they produced, making it as pleasant on the eye as possible.
Lightfoot is at his absolute worst here with this spotty production. It does no justice to the model, who to me, is the star of this show. Lightfoot is merely a wise-arse with a camera.
The true beauty of the model as seen on the home page, is NOT transferred to this set.
Wednesday, October 25th, 2017 on Tehaz
The first 12 sets with Pandora by you three blokes were stunningly fabulous!!! But the you collectively, dropped the ball. Which means the last 10 sets are unimaginative, pathetic, and a waste of bandwidth.
My apologies to Pandora. Sweetheart, this is not your fault. Arkisi, Leonardo and Fabrice just said 'Stuff it'.
I could rip the head off Arkisi, because he has decided his 'signature' will be of models naked from the first shot. And I don't give a hoot if she's wearing a dress or whatever. 2 shots in, she raises her hem and low-and-behold, a naked pussy.
My point is, in two shots, thanks to the raise hem, The girl is naked. That raised hem says, "Here I am, butt naked. This is all there is. I have nothing to play with, so there will be no fore-play between us. What you see, is all you get!!! Go figure!!"
Leonardo on the other hand, was never one to get 'up close and personal' with his models. So there is nothing out of the ordinary there. Fabrice didn't mind getting close, but just couldn't figure out what to do when he got there.
So I put your demise squarely on Arkisi's shoulders.
If you choose to come back, request Matiss for a set or two. Any confidence you might be lacking as a result of your last 10 sets will be restored by Matiss.
There is little difference between their capabilities, but where Arkisi has a 'bad day', Matiss is consistent. I have never witnesses a "Bad" set from Matiss.
Hurry back Pandora. I for one, miss you.
Monday, May 29th, 2017 on Pandora B
Matiss, we are fortunate for the many fresh, beautiful young ladies you have presented to us this year.
For all her outward beauty, Kendell could almost be forgiven if she considered herself a Diva. The wonderful news is, she doesn't. Honest, open, effervescent and without pretense - I think is the best way to describe her.
12 sets a year will never be enough of Kendell, so hopefully, we'll soon be seeing her on other pages within this group.
Kendell, I know I'm late with this, but Welcome to M-A and Thank you for sharing your stunning beauty with us, especially through Matiss, who doesn't forsake Erotic Beauty with rubbish artsy-fartsy work like some others.
And please do not be put off by the comments of the odd drongo halfwit who cannot control his urges to prove he's a man by making comments more suited to low-life vermin.
While I agree 100% with the sentiment, there are calmer, more polite ways of saying so.
Some think, that because girls get naked for this site, then they must be prostitutes, and as such, can't be offended by language.
Most of out here though, don't have time to have thoughts of this nature. We are just happy to be entertained by the work of a better than average photographer, and their presentation of a stunningly beautiful young lady.
Happy Association with M-A Kendell - and I mean, 12 sets a year, will NEVER be enough:)
Monday, May 29th, 2017 on Kendell
I have not seen the complete set yet, but what I have seen has convinced me Rebecca is a stunningly beautiful addition to this site. So Thank you, Antonio, for presenting her.
Judging by the previous comments, we all agree that we're privileged to have Rebecca share her perfection with us, so Thank you too, Rebecca for your time. Welcome to M-A, and may you have many pleasurable years with us.
Monday, May 29th, 2017 on Presenting Rebecca
Anybody reading my comments here, and at the various sites, might get the impression I'm an a-hole.
This is not generally the case, but I do get pissed off with half-wits who don't know what a camera is, much less what its used for, write saying how great a set is, when a moments refection of the offered images tell a completely different story.
I've been with M-A almost 10 years, and have noticed many changes, most of them ludicrous, but until recently, all writers could say was basic B-S.
Over the last couple of months however, more and more subscribers are offering their Honest opinions. I have not noticed one (I do not look at every set that comes in), but I have not seen one derogatory comment against any model, but some of the snappers (M-A very wrongfully calls anyone with a camera an Artist), are beginning to get a pasting from the people that keep M-A online.
And That's a Good thing. These so-called Artists should be pulled into line when their work fails, or their depiction of the model is not at her beautiful best.
So to those who are wondering, my angst is not against Sydney Wolf here or any other model. But I do get utterly angry at clowns who do not portray their model at her most exquisitely beautiful best.
In one of more favorable moments towards Met-Art, (they have had some horrendous brain-farts since Nov 2011), they do produce a great site and their models are among the most stunningly beautiful women on the planet.
Thanks & Cheers. R.
Friday, April 28th, 2017 on Sydney Wolf
So far, after three sets, and still unable to have one decent image of Sydney Wolf, I have rated this page as a '1'.
That is in no way directed at Sydney personally. but at her snapper Lightfoot.
I think that with a photographer who knew his/her craft, Sydney would be portrayed in all her feminine beauty.
But in all these sets is Lightfoots' cleverness. More likely his stoopidity (sic).
I'm stuffed how you can tell. Lightfoot is one of the most audacious snappers on the site. He has a camera far beyond his ability as a snapper to put to proper use.
How the hell can you tell??
This snapper hasn't taken one decent image of Sydney in three sets.
But your .....'shame about the photographer'.... is absolutely on the nail Thanks. R.
On the one hand you're right. If a set is so bad, I don't cast a vote, but it has come to my attention via another writer, that a '1' vote just might get through the 'guy with a camera' - that's all Lightfoot is - it Might get him to alter of changing his 'signature' style. Because his 'signature' is pure crap.
Friday, April 28th, 2017 on Recala
Mate, I only vote on a set that's worth voting for. But your comments have enlightened me somewhat. I'm going to give all three sets a '1', because I think they're all crap.
This twat couldn't get it if he was spoon-fed. He's nothing more than a self-centered, egotistical idiot who thinks he's God's Gift. According to Lightfoot, it's all about him. To hell with the model and how she's portrayed.
As for a different camera, my son, when he was 5 and had his first Instamatic shot better photos than this clown Lightfoot. (Then again, perhaps he should do away with his cardboard pin-hole throwaways).
As for one of the best here, I put him at the bottom of the barrel, along with Barty Varin - on top of Natasha Schon and Angela Linin.
Those who are wondering about scale for voting, I have not rated one of Lightfoots' work. Not because I don't appreciate the model, but because of the way Lightfoot has portrayed her.
If you were to analyze the sets, in the first, he has lit the background but lowered the lamp output so the colors aren't saturated, but it places Sydney in a shadow, so the ISO has to be drastically increased to compensate - that's why the images are all spotted and her skin color is that of someone just walking out of a cement dust shower.
The next two sets follow the same principle, decreasing with each set.
One thing to look for is highlights in her eyes. There are none to speak of, so no light is trained on Sydney herself, so she looks flat, like a cardboard cut-out dusted with cement.
Hey Seller, I know nothing more about music other than to say I enjoy it all except foreign-language opera.
But I do know something about photography and you praise for lightfoot is unfounded. He Still hasn't got it right.
If Sydney was to be picked up by Arkisi, Matiss, Karl Sirmi, Ron Offlin, Alex Lynn et al, we would the Real Sydney Wolf. Not not brain-dead idiots perception. Cheers. R.
Friday, April 28th, 2017 on Paradi
Another who knows the truth. Yay!!:)
Spot On mate:)
You must please easily. Her skin - if you LOOK at it is still pitted with black spot. Don't you like your models to look their absolute fabulous Best?? Or are you happy with 2nd-rate junk!!
Hey Rose, you see so much, yet miss the important things.
From what I could gather, Sydney might well be beautiful, her posing was great and the set size (number of images is great). But Lightfoot's ego and self-importance - both of which are as limitless as the universe, took control and he purposely destroyed the model and the set with his abrasive lack of adequate lighting.
And Yes, I have read, and choked on a few, of the comments here, including Arkie 2's request to you and your reply.
IF!! what you told him is true, why are only Varin and Lightfoot affected by this 'techies' errors.
Fact is, Varin and Lightfoot are akin, they both like to impose their superiority over the model.
Lightfoot is far removed from my list of 'followed' snappers - There are no Artists here now, not since Tony Murano's sad demise (my apologies to Ron Offlin) who comes close but doesn't submit often enough.
My point Rose, Lightfoot doesn't mean much to me, but Varin is one snapper I followed adamantly until Jan 2015, when I noticed a down-turn in the quality of his work. Three models - Adagio (12), Selestina (10) and Onorin (8), were systematically and insidiously destroyed by Varin by employing exactly the same method of lighting that Lightfoot has used in this set.
From the 4,564 zipped files I have, there is merely one set from lightfoot, and that is because he dared to shoot a model used frequently by a photographer I follow. (It's the Model I follow - the snapper rarely matters). The only startling thing about his work was it more than doubled the images you deemed allowable earlier this year. I think 169 images, but his work was normal - that is none of this insidious rubbish her has submitted here.
It is a shame you have no 'Quality Control' in place here. It's also a good thing that were there such a thing, I do not head such a department. Had I that authority, work such as Lightfoot displays here would be returned with a covering note - 'Not good enough, re-shoot, this is your first strike, three and you're out. - Like that hypocritical low-life Natasha Schon. You may recall writing an excuse for her work (only cowards and idiots need excuses)....that she didn't like to shoot 'vulgar' images. If that is the case, why did you pay for her submissions?? This is supposed to be a site of Erotic Beauty and Soft Core pornography - a title you dumped in Dec 2014 - the sites' 2nd stroke (brain-fart) in 3 years - The question is, Why was Schon paid at all when her work was not in the least Erotic??
So my suggestion to you, Dear Rose is, before you jump into murky waters with comments like those above, make sure there are no snags beneath the surface. There are some out here that hang around not only for the pussy, butterflies and all those other tasty, enjoyable bits. But for the photography, which includes every facet of the genre, and has to be perfect. Not merely adequate. The photography HAS to be about the model. If the snapper can't live with that - too bad - get a job where their ego can run amok. Just not here at Met-Art.
You might be interested to know, I have belonged to Playboy, Penthouse, Twisty's, Mac & Bumble, Eva's Garden, Pier999, Watch4Beauty, 21Sextury, In The Crack and AlsScan. And have forsaken them all for Met-Art and your models. They are simply The Best.
Friday, April 28th, 2017 on Presenting Sydney Wolf
My heart goes out to those of you here who think this set is an accurate depiction of the Model Sydney Wolf. It depresses me that so many of you can't see well enough to note the difference in the color strength on the walls and her skin.
This set is little more than an insult to Sydney, for not being portrayed at her beautiful best, made even more insidiously insulting in the fact this is her 'Presentation' set.
Shame on Met-Art for allowing such insulting work to be published!!!!
Thursday, April 27th, 2017 on Presenting Sydney Wolf
I agree with most of what you said mate, but the last part is only an educated guess, surely. But I accept your presumption. Cheers.
What??? No comment on her muddy, dirty, grubby skin tones????
Bull-dust Arkie. How come this error only comes to light with work from both Albert Varin and Lightfoot? Then a set cam in from Luca Helios, Oct 31 2016, and what a mess that was!! I spent hours trying to join the dots to get an impression of the model, and I think I found one of her eyes.
You say you look closely.....Well how come you didn't notice the difference in the lighting on the walls behind the model and how it contrasted starkly with her skin tones?
Hopefully. Preferably someone who uses competent lighting.
It's not simply difficult to appreciate beauty, it's bloody impossible.
Totally mate. She looks as though she's just crawled from a couple of tons of cement. What can be the matter with Charley L and Barty V?
It's about time we got some Truth and Honesty in these comments. I know little about photography, other than I started in 1949, aged 5, with a box brownie. But even I can see the boredom Arkisi is permeating through-out this set. I Still think his Chimpanzee is responsible.
Wednesday, March 15th, 2017 on Smirea
You are so right, friend. I don't think Arkisi shot this at all. He's set the scene, and then let his pet Chimp loose with the camera. It is really quite a sad set when compared to the work he is truly capable of.
I'm with you, SorthernMaster - how far 'Southern', might you be?
Truth be told, I have been an admirer of Dg for sometime. But it distresses me to the point I am worried about his mental health, because the the brain-farts he often endures after a shoot can't be good for him. It's certainly no improvement on what went before and the extra band-width of the set puts it beyond my financial capabilities. With WiFi, time is money - down-load time that is. Then I'm limited to the Size, because the bigger the set, the longer it takes to down-load, and my 3GB allowable,per fortnight, disappears overnight.
So I'm with you, mate. Why stuff-up perfect set of a '10' model, with a rehash of the same images. Defies reason to me.
Wednesday, March 15th, 2017 on Atoro
If you can spare the time to join the dots.....
You only know she has brown eyes because you have seen far sets of her than this one. Here, her eyes a just pools of mud.
Sunday, March 5th, 2017 on Matolia
If he is reminded often enough of what an idiot he shows himself to be, perhaps he will burst that balloon of an ego of his.
Well said, by the way;)
Don't be ashamed of being a Varin hater. You'll find you're not alone.
I am bloody delighted to find some of you guys speaking the truth about Varin. To my mind, he is a self-opinionated drop-kick with an ego so huge all he can see is Albert Varin. He is the center of the universe. Just ask him, he'll be delighted to confirm his self-worth.
This scum-bucket has ruined the careers of at least three of the most beautiful models to pose for M-A. Adagio, Onorin and Selestina. Between them they amassed 30 sets. From memory, Selestina posed 8 times, Onorin 10 and Adagio 12.
But they all suffered at the hands of this malicious mongrel.
Veselin is indeed a beauty, and like every other red-blooded male, I Love her tan-lines. But any model who skin tone is muddier than a rain-soaked football/NFL ground after a Grand Final, is dead. Because a grubby model is not erotic.
Thanks for the Truth, to you guys who aired their honest, blunt and forth-right opinions. Keep at the bastard!! Cheers. Rich.
I hope you folk who are 'Really' interested in this site, to watch the Blog over the next week.
Met-Art has disintegrated so badly since my 'second' coming in 2010 I am bereft.
I intend to do an 'autopsy' on this site, and put its insidious bullshit in chronological order.
It is hoped, you folk will follow my story-line and add your own observations.
I am just one bloke with a 'chip' on his shoulder. But I would put money on it,that once I start, you folk will have observations that I have missed.
Thursday, March 2nd, 2017 on Emerle
There are no superlatives left to better describe this absolute HONEY!
I had no idea until now, of what I've been missing for 14 months.
Debora is only my 2nd Perfect 10 with such a long, unbroken chain of sets.
And the Good Thing is, she has enough photogs working with her, her chain should remain unbroken for Years:)
Wednesday, February 22nd, 2017 on Debora A
I think this is a great double debut, tho' Ergo confuses me - is this really Red Fox' debut? Has she posted somewhere else? No matter, I love the set. Innovative in that we don't often get beach joggers taking their gear off for us:)
It's been noted as being a cold, blustery day, so Eselda's 'unveiling' is so much more appreciated.
But. If I might make a comment on the lighting, especially in the kiosk(?). Outdoors, the natural light was manageable, but once under cover, the density of the timber controlled the color saturation, making skin tones and garment colors very drab. Fill-in flash would have improved this pleasant set immeasurably. (See, I CAN make nice comments when they're deserved;).
Seadog hit the nail on the head with a wrecking ball when he noted 'some of the best Artists are in front of the camera'. It's been my opinion for a decade +. Since Tony Murano's demise in March 2012, there are Maybe a dozen snappers here who can lay claim to the title of Artist.
So my congratulations to Eselda & Red Fox. May you both continue your great work - especially on sunnier days:)
Saturday, February 18th, 2017 on Presenting Eselda
You have a point Kris. I too, have noticed the similarities of these sets. Not the least being her hair pulled tight against her head and trailing down her back. Her pony tail should be on the crown of her head, giving the appearance of the frisky little filly she is, rather than a middle-aged, sexless spinster.
The other thing that gets me, is the time-frame and the arrangements between these two, to shoot 25 sets in approximately 30 months - because in Every set, Veselin has the same earrings in her ears, the same chain bracelet on her wrist. Her nail polish is the same in every set as well.
All tat said, I concur with the majority. Veselin is cute, with a capital K(sic):) Her tan lines are the most sexsational anywhere, her breasts are compact gorgeousness, and her butt is truly edible.
I am really waiting for the day when her butterfly escapes its cocoon, of which we have seen many shots, spreads its' beautiful wings and really flies.....:)
Monday, February 6th, 2017 on Rovani
I absolutely agree, Dreadnought. Heels define her legs much more comfortably than standing on tip-toes for hours on end. Getting greater definition of her calves is obtained by pressing her toes into the soles of her shoes. Such little effort to attain more.
.......Merit recognition at M-A etc.....
The Models don't count for one. Look at ANYTHING Barty Varin has submitted since January 2015, Tirata is the exception.
And we look at Luca Helios and his 'Presentation' of a new model. I forget her name, because I tried for Hours, trying to connect the dots, and STILL haven't a clue about the model and the reason for Roses's panty-saturating orgasm still eludes me.
So we now know photographer can submit any shit at all, and it will be accepted by the office, because NOBODY, REALLY vets the submissions of their 'Artists'.
Brings me to the last point of 'Who Doesn't Matter'.
That's me, and everyone else who keeps this 'site' valid. This includes all the boys and girls who pay Handsomely, I might add, for the privilege of down-loading, in some cases, absolute bull-shit. We are now expected to to suffer shit in an abbreviated form half-arsed snappers too tired to prepare 24 hours before a designated shoot!!!!! I remember Barty Varin shooting 360 images in little more than an hour!!!!! And you say the 'Artists' need less stress. Jesus H. Christ, you drongoes need to get your act together!!!!!
So here's the thing Jonathon. Allowing for Rose running around in her cum-saturated panties, make SURE, that EVERY abbreviated set that arrives, depicts the model at her Finest.
I don't like it, but will suffer it if the models are : -
'Not Abused by some half-arsed drop-kicks ' interpretation of 'Art".
And Finally, you with the saturated panties, where, in your lexicon, does the word 'Vulgar' appear?? I have checked mine, and there is a simple explanation - "A word used by Sexual Hypocrites " to hide their true feelings". -
So Natasha Schon and probably Angela Linin fit the above description. Hypocrites looking for 'Girls to Seduce'. They don't like 'Vulgar' shots? What the HELL defines Vulgar in Erotic, Soft-core photography????
You would be AMAZED at the money you could save by removing 80% of crap snappers you're currently paying for, who create the majority of the crap on this site.
Rose, next time you move in your panties, I hope it's over a set we can both enjoy:)
Cheers, Sweetheart, Rich.
Friday, December 2nd, 2016 on To Be Or Not To Be Eighty
My last word on this latest spastic 'brain fart' from the management of Met-Art!!
The 'Rules' of this site appear to be as follows: -
1). The Boss is Always Right, no matter how pathetically childish the decisions made.
2). When the Boss is wrong, see Rule 1 above.
3). Few people matter on this site. The Exceptions being: the Management, and the so-called Artists - of which I estimate grandly, about a dozen earn that honor. Personally, I count maybe 10. AND, I'm being generous with that figure.
So we now know who Matters at M-A et al.
So Who DOESN'T
Thank you Rose. Your comments, as always were moderate, in the circumstances.
I stand admonished.
However, as _fer_realz_ wrote a fortnight ago, Met-Art should be maintaining the standards of earlier years, I too, joined in 2010, and have noticed many adverse changes to the site.
I have no idea how long you have been with M-A, but in late 2011, a brain-fart occurred on the site that incurred the wrath of your First and Foremost Erotic Glamour Artists to ever have graced this site.
I refer to Tony Murano. Such was the brain-fart, that Tony quit, and hasn't been seen heard of since March 2012. (I MIGHT be a month out on that).
What happened, late 2011, women with their legs spread, pussy exposed had to be shot from thousands of yard distance, or, if the photographer happened to be in the same location, said pussy had to be airbrushed into oblivion. Hence the demise of Tony, who really put his models 'Up-front, and Center'. He treated his girls as Princesses, and they reacted in like manner.
That abysmal period was shattered by Rylsky in March 2013, when he portrayed Irina J in ALL her glory.
In December 2014, we experienced another brain-fart, when you wrote about, the actual wording escapes me, but basically, the poms - hence my reference, and apologies to Jon, that genitalia could be seen, but the model must not be seen 'to be enjoying herself.' Please correct me if my recollection is incorrect.
For a while thru' 2015, this ploy worked, but happily, commonsense has prevailed, and those photographers who know their worth, told the poms where to go.
We now have a site I'm immensely pleased with. But.
In 2010, the Artistry that portrayed the model in the highest quality HD color imaginable.
Today, we have a snapper portraying is models in the most abominable light possible. And apparently, you've just given this dropkick a raise!!!!
I tell you Rose, if I had known this was the sort of shocking work you accepted, I would have submitted work years ago. I never did, because I didn't consider it worthy, but with every set shown from Barty Varin, I cry.
When I joined M-A, you did not publish crap. But since Jan 2015, that's all Varin Has submitted. To my best knowledge he started 'experimenting' with Solveig in Aug 2014.
Check out his work with Selestina, Veselin, Onorin, Adagio, Tirata, Emmy Sweet, I could fill a book with a list of models' names that that bastard has humiliated.
Remember seadawg, I don't quite have his seniority - 72 today - and I have apolgised to your service people for having been abusive in posts in 2012. But like my peer, I have been in and out of hospitals for the last 2½ years, but for three prior years, I was crook, and no-one knew why.
What ever happens to Met-Art will not concern me much longer, but I WOULD like something done with Barty- ( derivative of Albert used on boys in Day care, also in a derogative form for an adult who's making an idiot of themselves). Make the clown come to his senses, and treat his models as beautiful human beings, and less as a piece of meat on a butcher's block!!!!
Sunday, November 20th, 2016 on To Be Or Not To Be Eighty
As an assumed 'Academic', your spelling is atrocious.
That said, There are points made in you submission that I fully agree with. Keeping Rose was a master-stroke. She generally makes sense when she submits a comment.
However, I do not agree with Jon's immoderate purchases of all the sites he has acquired. And the reason I say this, is because the extra work his staff have to contend with, without significant increases in staffing levels. There is a term, 'Bitten off more than he can chew' about sums it up.
Entirely agree with you _fer_realz_ Maintaining the standard set at the outset is more important than lowering their standard to conform. I too, joined M-A in 2010, but in succeeding years, there have been what might be termed, in a jocular fashion, as Brain-farts. Decisions have been made that were not in the best interest of their subscribers, actually culminating in the loss of their most prolific, and talented photographer, Tony Murano quitting.
The explosion in the brain occurred about November 2011, and Tony's last submission was March or April 2012.
Tony was, and remains, I believe, their #1 artist - I actually HATE that word in reference to the current group of snappers in their employ. Only a handful of the current photographers deserve that crown. And one, who I took a shine to in those early days has become an absolute idiot. I'm sure the poor bloke has a had a mental breakdown, but M-A are still filling their sites with his pathetic, model-destroying rubbish.
Kudos mate, you write brilliantly.
I sit a long way south of the equator mate, and it appears from here, that you are to be congratulated, or not, on your apparent promotion from (and I quote), a site that brings art to beauty, erotic glamour and soft core images, to the supervisor of a Day Care Center for traumatic, self-indulgent, self-centered, spoiled brats. The last of which, I have found but one, in my six, climbing 7 years on this site.
I am FAR from enthralled about the destruction happening on Met-Art!!
_fer_realz_ a month back questioned your move to these smaller sets, and got taken to task by Rose, for his comments on the site of the model in question. This, I might add, came from the same Rose who creamed her panties, gushed uncontrollably into her knickers, over a worthless piece of crap submitted by Luca Helios, because it had a 'Halloween' them. Rose went spastic over a set of pics that were dull, dark, unfocused and an absolute abuse to the subscribers of this site.
Jonathon (sounds very English to me), I have been a subscriber to this site since mid 2010. The first 18 months of my membership was in jaw-dropping awe of the work done, Primarily by Tony Murano, and the models involved.
Towards the end of 2011 someone at Met-Art turned spastic. Women were no longer allowed to show their genitalia. Women with their legs spread could only be shot from no less than 500m. If her lips were actually on display, they had to be air-brushed into oblivion. This bull-shit resulted in Tony Murano submitting his last set in March 2012.
Happily, Rilsky submitted a of Irena J in March 2013 which not only showed her 'work-station' in not only HD color, but also operational.
Other photographers soon followed suit, until December 2014, when we got a blog from Rose, that the Poms had decided, while genitalia would be permitted, the model was not to show 'Enjoyment' of any kind.
Now correct me if I'm wrong, but on December 16th, 1774, America told England where to go, as, being dressed as Iroquois Indians, they boarded three British East India ships and tossed 347 chests of tea into the Boston harbor. Cost in their money, 18,000.00 English pounds. (some say to equivalent to $1,000,000.00.
Anyway, further taxes imposed on these 'POMs' - Prisoners of Mother England' - they were darstadly criminals, having been found guilty of stealing a loaf of bread, or a penny-farthing out of someone's vest pocket, to ease the prisons back across the Atlantic. (Australia was settled in the same way some 10 years later).
My point Jonathon, (still a very English name), Britain sent an army of Red-Coats to the shores of America. With the help of a few frogs, and if Lonny Donegan is to be believed, a lot more alligators, "We loaded their mouths with cannon balls, and powered their behinds, and when we touched the powder off, the 'gators lost their mind........"
Cornwallis and his Red-Coats let America totally humiliated. Hip-Hip-Hooray!!!!
So what the blazes are you doing cow-towing to the f-wits in England now?
Maybe I'm beginning to get it. Jonathon. English to the core!! America can't even pronounce Charles, (and who in their right minds would want to), so Charles, England, becomes Chuck in the States. Jonathon can become John or Jon, but you're unhappy with either. Jonathon. Money, so obviously from Mommy & Daddy has put you in the seat you currently occupy .
Jonathon, (very English, that), you may have long since (an English phrase), quit reading this opus. But be assured, 'Old Mate') - Australian slang - be rest-assured, my friend, that may will read this, and say "For F's sake!!!! He's right!!!!)
Get your head out of your arse, Jonathon. It is, when all is done and dusted, your subby's who keep you operational, not your snappers.
That reminds me of another Met-Art failure!! You list your photographers under 'Artists'. God Forbid.
You have MAYBE, FIVE snappers who could carry that mantle and be deserving.
Bottom line JONATHON, you fuck with Met-Art ........ I will surely fuck with you,
Wednesday, November 16th, 2016 on To Be Or Not To Be Eighty
Just don't reply if she asks, "Does my arse look big in this...." Carolina has a great rear-end, what ever she' wearing - and nothing:)
Monday, October 31st, 2016 on Miralo
A photographer worth his salt shouldn't dumb tricks. An Artist, doesn't need to force the attention down. A non-tricked head shot will automatically force the viewer to inspect the shot fully.
Me, I've been around for a decade or 7, and I brush over cropped head shots, preferring the entire image, probably because at 5, I was taught a couple of rules.
1. Never cut off the top of a persons head - or their feet.
2. Never have an object like a tree or power-pole growing out of their head.
Those two simple rules have held me in good stead for 60 + years.
Really Arkie 2, I don't know why I'm here. I've given up on expecting Varin to produce a set without it being the result of his ego-driven, masochistic, moronic and debasing attitude to women. I guess I hoped, just once....maybe.... But no, just more of his junk that he's been dropping into this site since late 2014 - and with no REMORSE!!!!
Monday, October 31st, 2016 on Qiata
This set is as worthless a holey bucket in a thunderstorm, dear Lisa....
Monday, October 31st, 2016 on Presenting Mila Mendes
Nail on the head _fer_realz-!! I too am tired of these broads being photographed in half light. Who cares about Halloween??
Met-Art is supposed to be about glamour, beauty and erotic soft-porn. This set has none of those attributes.
I am sick to death of fuzzy, pixelated images that do the model no honor. While Mila is probably very gorgeous, her beauty is disguised, no, obliterated by this idiotic lack of light.
Luca, (I thought Luca was aa girls name), you are supposed to present your models in the most favorable light possible. (N reference to the Lack of light here). Especially in a Presentation package, Mila should look like, and be treated as, an absolute Princess.
And No, Rose, I can't agree with you for a minute. This site is not sounding board for rank amateurs - and that's what this set represents!!
I sincerely miss Tony Murano. After Met-Art had that spastic fit in 2011, Tony has quit, and who could blame him. He Was and remains the greatest Glamour ARTIST in this organization. I might add, he is still the only TRUE artist to grace these pages.
Arkisi got his mantel until recently. But I notice he has now got the idea that it is good to dump a model naked - butt naked, into his sets. The model has no mystery, so she becomes another naked broad - so what?
Varin? Despise the man for what he has become. I'm deleting every set I've collected of his for his atrocious treatment of Adagio, Emma Sweet, Onorin, Veselin - too many to list. He puts the crap down to his self-centered, ego, believing his own press. The clowns who tell him how good he is wouldn't know art from a bar-fly!!!!
Good news? Matiss, Flora, Koenart, Ron Offlin, Alex Lynn, Karl Sirmi, etc etc, have earned, and own a special place on my Met-Art HD's. And if you look at there sets, the reason is pretty obvious. There is no Bull-shit!!!
You are one of the true artists on this site, Flora. Your models have all been sensational and your work with them is exceptional.
Miranda continues your tradition of getting your models to participate in the shoot. And I can name only two others who do this consistently.
Thank you Flora, for presenting Miranda in such a delightful way. And Miranda, Thank you for sharing your exquisite beauty so openly and with such obvious joy.
Wednesday, September 21st, 2016 on Presenting Miranda Trent
Hello Pandora, I would like to open by saying I endorse the comments above, that mention your 'off-the-planet', exquisite beauty. I too, appreciate your delightful contributions to these pages.
You are, without doubt, one of the most succinctly beautiful women to grace these pages. We are blessed, that you give your time for our absolute delight and pleasure.
All that said, there is one observation I'd like to bring to your attention. It would add volumes to your sets, if, when you have your pussy spread for us to gaze at in total awe, if you, instead of smiling, (your smile is captivating), but for a slight frown to appear, and if your eyes could convey a greater depth of sensuality.....
Lastly, you have worked with 3 photographers, and here I blame Leonardo completely, (he did introduce you to us), you have no bio. Arkisi on his site has failed with this aspect as well.
It matters little what you have to say. One model told us point blank, that her sexual preferences were none of our business, and was not prepared to talk about them. However, some indication of your life, (hopefully with a sexual theme), would be appreciated, especially by me. It is much nicer to be able to relate to the model and her aspirations, if there is, as I put it - In her own words - an insight into your thoughts.
Thank you again, for giving us these images of seductive, milky skin tones, and your mouth-watering beauty.
Tuesday, July 19th, 2016 on Pandora B
Apart from one grumble-guts, the consensus of opinion is that it's a wonderful set of an outstandingly beautiful model, (Malinda can be quite the chameleon at times), photographed by a true artist.
Malinda is as absolute Fox. Cute, Cuddly, Innocent, demure and more sexy than is fair. There is only one of her, and so many of us:(
So my thanks to you for bringing her back. Again, again and again.
Other sites like Erro and E-D seem to have forgotten she exists, and that's a shame.
Thursday, June 9th, 2016 on Juacama
You're showing your age, fer. Tom Jones has been around as long as I have:)
But I totally agree with your comments.
You're so right Seadogg. We had our own lingo back then. And we didn't have to massacre English to make our thoughts known. It's no wonder the little blighters of today can't spell.
:) Perhaps fer, you should enhance your education with a "trip Downunder":) You will find many similar words in common use in Australia and New Zealand. 'Yonks' has been around all my life, and I won't see 70 again. Just sayin':)
Hey Marlene, why didn't you just put her in a rusty old iron chastity belt and be done with it?? Your two sets of this model have taken her back to pre-Victorian times!! You could have posed a department store dummy and got the same results!!! Would have been a lot cheaper as well. Swill down a drain pipe!! That's what this is. Thank you Leonardo for giving us some Reality!!!!!
But never fear, Marlene, I will NEVER waste my $50.00 monthly subs on rubbish like this!!!!
Friday, June 3rd, 2016 on Sheki
An apology, I am sorry for not having edited my last post before sending it. Mistakes were made in haste. I'm sorry it reads as roughly as it does.
Thursday, June 2nd, 2016 on Berenice
I have finally read your Biography, Berenice, and I was enthralled, excited by your candor, vitality and enthusiasm - all the things Rose wrote about in response to some dip-s..t who complained that your bio was too long.
To be perfectly honest, I didn't take too much notice with your first set. I thought ArtofDan was mean for putting you such torture in that setting. But I understand now, why the set actually fits your persona.
You mentioned nothing about sex, but reading between the lines of you bio, and having already seen your 2nd - Bircen set, you are a pocket-sized dynamo that would be ready for anything, anytime, any where.
Speaking for myself, and possibly for every other member who takes the time to view your work, it will be over to you to say when enough is enough, because WE will love everything you produce for as long as you want. There will be no limit on our desire for more, more, more:)
I am with you 100% on the importance of the models' bio, which I note as "In Her Own Words". Her comments/remarks/observations are as important to me as the set itself, to know where the lass is coming from.
That is why it is so infuriating to me, that models who have done more than two sets, have had nothing at all to say. Case in point, Zelda B - 12 sets for E-D and 35 for M-A - and no Bio!!!! What gives?? Zelda is only one of many. Check it out:))
Blame it on the water. Everybody else does. But you're right, Ukrainian Woman have that special Something:) Berenice is no exception!
Berenice, it has to be said, that you have a lot more going for you than your exotic beauty that has been mentioned so eloquently by many before me.
You are also a very compassionate young lady, as your many responses to the posts suggest. I had no idea that the subject model even saw, let alone read these comments, so Thank you for caring, and Thank you for sharing, not only your exquisite beauty, but your humility as well.
Long May You Reign as a Princess in this genre.
Thursday, June 2nd, 2016 on Bircen
Hello Evangelina and Welcome to Met-Art. Thank you Arkisi, for bringing her to us in such a bold and intimate fashion.
When I started collecting about 6 years ago, I didn't know how to stop, resulting in about 900 models. Sanity prevailed and I culled that number to 300+ favorites. 18 months ago, another brain-wave reduced that number to 100 Perfect 10's. That was to be my limit, collecting these girls from where-ever I could find them.
Models come along, like Evangelina and my resolve is out the window. How could I NOT add this young lady to my Perfect 10's. She is the embodiment of Perfection and Arkisi has set the bar very high for her in this first set.
Let it be said, Evangelina sailed over that bar with consummate ease.
I am looking forward to many more sets with these two working in tandem, be it here, @ Eternal Desire or Sex-Art.
Sunday, May 29th, 2016 on Presenting Evangelina
Well there you bloody well go!! Even us Old blokes can learn something new every day. I had no idea, that Erro has been retired for 3 (2016) years, because recently, he has been popping up an a pretty regular basis.
Thank goodness for Archives:)
Saturday, May 28th, 2016 on Sendiri
Bloody shame it's the end of a fabulous journey. What follows from Lucy Helios, in a two-horse race, she wouldn't even run second!!
That is not sad at all, my dear. I am in agreement 100% - there are very few comments I "agree" with on this site - too many A-lickers who spout B/S about sets without every having looked at or analyzed them.
As for the outfit, I prefer her in 'something' rather than coming on set cold, butt-naked.
More to the point, I am writing an obituary for Leonardo, who seems to have died. This is his last posting of this wondrous young woman, a lass he has allowed free-rein when they've worked together - 40 sets to date, and Lily has proved to be the most sensuous, wanton, sexually uninhibited, sex-on-legs model anywhere. Penthouse, Hustler, Playboy et al, eat your collective hearts out!!! None of you have portrayed a woman as perfect as LILY C.
It is such a pity that Lucy Helios doesn't have Leonardo's perception. She takes pretty pictures, I suppose, but the wanton sexuality that Leonardo brings out in Lily, is sadly missing in Lucy's work. She misses the essence of her model completely./
Hence my Obit for Leonardo God Save Leonardo and Long May He Reign!! You two were a TEAM and you created MAGIC. So long pal:(
Kaleesy is beyond beautiful. She is Feminine Perfection from the roots of her hair to the tips of her manicured toe-nails. Kaleesy is absolutely Fabriculous. I have been gasping for breathe since her very first image.
And Fabrice, your work with this living Angel is as Fabriculous as she herself is.
Such a shame those pitiful, woefully limp-wristed in-bred poofter-poms in the houses of Lords and the Commons, would have us return the status of women to the Dark/Middle Ages when they were locked up in rusty old chastity belts or burned at the stake as witches for expressing any hint of sexuality.
Bloody Brown and his cohorts cannot re-write the American Constitution and tell us women cannot be portrayed "Enjoying" themselves in these pages.
Saturday, April 30th, 2016 on Tirza
Flora, previous comments accepted, this is the set that has convinced me Leila Mazz belongs in my Perfect 10's.
I owe you an apology, I checked this young lady out only because Arkisi had posted the last set. I should have been more observant and taken more notice of your posts. I reiterate, you are in the top echelon of Artists in this selection of sites. There is one other woman I collect occasionally, but the others, none are worth a tinker's dam, because they have no clue on the meaning of the word erotic. Great picture-takers all of them. But this, and these magazines are the wrong genre for them.
They'd do well in travel brochures, home decor magazines, but erotic glamour? They don't have a clue.
I will follow this young lady, look for her at E-A, Sex-Art, and now that Arkisi has joined the party, on E-D as well. Leila deserves all the attention she can get. Thank you for introducing her. Cheers, Rich:)
Wednesday, April 20th, 2016 on Istelad
Too many so-called 'Artists' here are going this way. Flora is in the top echelon of photographers here and at E-A (in my humble opinion), but I'm going off Berty Varin rapidly, for this very reason.
I could understand this off-putting coloring, if the sets were designed around a Victorian-era setting, but these girls are Hot, Vibrant 21st century young women and should be presented as such.
To be honest with all who have commented here, wisely, I might add, it is refreshing that the comments are reaching beyond the model and actually commenting on the imagery. Too often, commentators say 'What a great set'. While the model is nearly always feminine perfection, that's as far as they see. They're not looking at the presented set.
So Thank you Dark-Storm for suggesting more color. And Thank you Camo, for your suggesting heeled, sexy shoes. I don't know (I was thinking it would), make it easier on the girls, but sexy 8" stilettos....WOW, wearing them is an art in itself:)
Although I do not agree with you three all the time, on this point I agree whole-heartedly. I despise naked feet as a point of focus, with a passion I can spit. But you can't beat feet in a sexy pair of shoes or better yet, decorated with a very sexy pair of panties:)
Pandora B deserves more respect that Fabrice has shown her here. The last 30-odd images have nothing whatever to do with what has gone before.
They destroy a set that, with time and effort could be saved if put in the correct image order - starting cool and finishing like an exploding fire-cracker.
Sunday, April 17th, 2016 on Calita
You are partly right mate. The Model is fantastic, the Set is shite. You got the rest right though.
Nail on the Head, Ergo:)) This clown should stick to vases and fruit bowls!!
Thankyou Checkers!!:) Somebody has finally seen the light. Congratulations, Friend:)
With the exception of Pandora B, this set is a load of B/S!!
Hasn't ANYONE noticed that the the pot boils, cools off and then totally ices up at the end?
This set was produced by a limp-wristed psychotic moron, or a limp-wristed psychotic moron with a twisted sense of humor.
This dick-head has never been one of my favorite shooters, I loathe to call the idiot a photographer, and only collect images of my Perfect 10's this drop-kick stuffs around with.
Fabrice doesn't give any clue to your gender, but a female would have a far better clue of the Female Psyche than you have shown here.
Let me pose you a question. If you were to ring an Escort Agency, in your case a Male Escort Agency, at the knock on your door, would you be expecting the dude on the other side to be butt-naked with a hard-on? Did I hear a No?
FYI Fabrice, women like to be whimsical, mysterious, to keep a few secrets back before opening up and giving her partner what he's been panting for over the past ½ hour.
An Artist, tells a story. It has a beginning, the body of, and the end. An Artist knows the difference between the start and the end, and tells his story in order, so everyone gets satisfaction, and hopefully, a happy ending.
I shudder to think what's in store for as, as there are another 3 sets of your work to plough through!! Before I say God Save Us from Idiots, I hope some reason and sanity has returned to you!!!!!
One of my favorite things about the models on these sites, is their Bio's.
Often as they recorded inaccurately by M-A (a 5' 1" model with a 91cm chest is considered Small!!?? Hazel colored eyes are often brown and a Brunette is Black), these stats add a little reality to the model posing.
Most of these models are asked to supply a quote, to enhance their recorded stats, and again, to give the model some substance, but too often, this aspect of her bio is left blank. Pandora B here and Zelda B are two who immediately spring to mind.
Arkisi, I know, is one photog who has shot both and has both girls on his site, so perhaps it is over to him to rectify this anomaly. Or should M-A themselves be jolted in to action?
Either way, I hope somebody will add that extra perspective to the bio's of these gorgeous women, and Soon.
Sunday, April 3rd, 2016 on Pandora B
Monday morning, and I'm a bit slow after a w/e in the wet - beer, that is. Took me a minute to figure-out your 'box' reference Rose. Then the penny finally dropped....Pandora. Geeez!!
The young lady has picked the perfect name for herself, because she sure is full of delightful surprises.
Well done Arkisi for presenting every facet of Pandora's undeniable beauty.
Pandora, Thank You, my dear for 'lifting the lid' and displaying these succulent facets:) 10/10 to you both, only because that's as high as the scale allows.
Sunday, April 3rd, 2016 on Bedace
There was a time, Ms Koen, that I did not take your work seriously, but with Alexia here, and your recent work with some of the other models I collect, you have shown that you can play with the best!!:)
I hope you bring Alexia back to us often and throw in a video or two as well.
Alexia is joining my list of Perfect 10's and I will be paying closer attention to further submissions from you;)
Thank you both, for this beautiful Presentation set:)
Friday, April 1st, 2016 on Presenting Alexia
It's pretty obvious from the comments here, that you guys forget the entree, dive right into the mains, and leave no room for the sweetest of sweets.
From where I sit, the entree is exquisitely delicious. The table has an over-abundance of mains, sadly, because there has been no room left for the dessert.
Mademoiselle Koenart I quit collecting Viola after her 8th set, for this very reason. I request a menu that includes dessert, Sticky Date is nice, in her next set.
Like a lot of Americans, I devour the entree, take a very long time over dessert, and will consider mains after.
Please explain to the lovely Viola, that if she is not prepared to serve Sticky Date dessert, I will be removing her menu from Preferred List.
Tuesday, March 29th, 2016 on Viola Bailey
"The incredible Albert Varin....." Are you for Real?? Have you REALLY looked at some most) of his work over the past 15 months??
I don't often waste my time reading the comments here, because I loathe arse-lickers which by whom most of these comments are written. I'll give you your remarks on Cristin, she is adorable. But to call AV "Incredible" is insulting to the majority of models he has worked with since Jan 2015!!
There are far too many to list here of the models he has crucified with sub-standard, shoddy, lazy application to his craft. But two, I will mention, Adagio and Emma Sweet have been abused by Varin to the "Enth Degree"
His first three sets with Adagio were shot in the space of 90 minutes. Natural lighting, which was abysmal, images repeated and he had this foot-fetish thing going. Then, considering himself untouchable, to try to hide the horror of his work, he sepia toned the vast majority of the frames. All he succeeded in doing with this "artistic bullshit" was turn his models' skin to mud.
The same with Emma Sweet. Three sets with this beautiful young lady, and we have a repetition of Adagios' first sets, minus the foot fetish bull. Emma's 3 sets are all in the same setting, shot in natural light, what there is of it, and her skin is the color of mud. The best frames of the 400-odd in the sets, are the very last four, where she is outside, fully clothed, and the 'Natural Light' is bright enough to sharpen the work.
I don't know, _fer_realz_, if you're not on the payroll of M-A, or if you get free to their sites for posting nice thing about these so-called Artists, but I know I am neither. I pay $AU50.00 (approx) per month for the privilege of acquiring images of the most beautiful women on then internet, and I hate, Hate, HATE being taken for granted. Varin not only takes me for granted, he insults his models, insults the subscribers and belittles himself, his profession and makes a mockery of the work other, more ethical photographers put into their work.
Viv Thomas wrote a short time ago, that the models here deserved Respect. So true. But so do we, the subscribers.
That having been said, this is the best work I've seen from Varin in 15 months. It's bright, focused, colorful and alive. But he is still an arse-hole for dumping his shit on the site!!!!!
Tuesday, March 29th, 2016 on Presenting Cristin
For me to collect this girl, her photographer will have to be more committed to his model, and a lot more to his work.
Wednesday, March 2nd, 2016 on Telkis
You have missed nothing. I gave up reading the comments years ago, because most of these clowns go all gaga, eyes popping out their head, jaw hitting the floor....Oh WOW!!, before they've even looked at the images.
I am not a hairy fan, but this girl is delectable, likes to show her working parts, and IF Sironi had done the job he's paid to, would have shown her 'working parts', working. Something he failed miserably to do. 10 for Sienne for her presentation, 4 for Sironi for his half-hearted work.
It is amazing, the amount of bullshit written by some people on this site, that has no bearing on the content whatsoever.
I fully intended to download Veselin's work, until I realized just who the 'Artist' was.
In all honesty, Albert Varin was Tony Murano's successor, but a couple of models he has worked with, has turned me off him in a big way.
Adagio. His first 3 sets of her, almost 400 images, were shot in less that 90 minutes. All three sets involved is fetish for feet. All images were colorless, so he added insult to injury by sepia-toning 50% of his work.
This prick gets paid great money to entertain us. Well, on that score, he is a total failure.
Here's a heart-felt tip, Varin. Leave your drug-addled, booze-infused, 'Artistic' crap in the rubbish bin where it belongs.
If I wanted my images toned, a touch of a button on my printer will give me the effect required. That is IF I wanted. I DON'T. Your attempts at sepia-toning Adagio, turned her images to mud. You know it, but you kept trying, and failed!!!!
It costs me $AU50.00 a month for Met-Art, plus another $AU100.00 for 6GB of data per fortnight for downloads. You might now, understand my anger at the money I waste on your 'artistic' bullshit!!!!
Wednesday, February 17th, 2016 on Veselin
There is no denying the beauty of this young lady, it's a pity, as usual, that Koenart has failed in capturing her personality. I do not make a habit of collecting this person's work, for this very reason. He/she/it, has no knowledge of the female anatomy, and even less of the female psyche.
Most of the women posing for Met-Art and their affiliates do so for the money. Most are paying their own way through university, but they could be re-modeling their home, or filling their wardrobe with beautiful clothes.
With very few exceptions, however, most pose for the enjoyment, and the opportunity to display their 'wares' to titillate the viewer. And by turning the viewer on, they themselves become aroused. And this is where Koenart fails, as do most female snappers, they forget that their models want to participate in the shoot, let themselves go and enjoy the freedom of being who they are, without restriction.
So I have kept Raena's sets, in the hope that Arkisi, Matiss or Deltagamma will take up her cause and let her be herself, and not the blow-up vinyl doll portrayed here by Koenart!!!!!
Wednesday, February 17th, 2016 on Raena
100% with you Tony. This guy can shoot when he wants to, but too too often, he gets lazy and we get tripe like this. Emma is certainly a sweet young thing. Problem is Varin left her personality at the door. Any model can smile for the camera, but how many can actually 'project' sexy, sensuality, audacity? Met-Art is supposed to be an Erotic/Soft porn site. And that's a bit of a laugh in itself, really. This set proves it.
Friday, February 12th, 2016 on Presenting Emma Sweet
A lovely girl, but thanks to Matiss, a generally disappointing set.
Matiss, when you're working with a model, she is before you firstly, for our viewing pleasure, secondly for you to vent your artistic flare.
Sorry Matiss, but your 'Artistic Flare' might appeal to you, but it leaves me absolutely spitting sparks - livid!!!!
So mate, just do your job and produce the best images you possibly can for the PAYING subscribers to this site. It SHITS me, that I have to pay $AU50.00 per month to Met-Art, and other sites, and am forced to accept mediocre (at best) - (sub-standard is closer to the mark), from guys who should know better.
You are one of only six photographers I collect. I reluctantly download others, but only if they have the temerity to impose their style on the models you guys have used and who are in my Perfect 10's.
At one stage, I was collecting over 800 M-A models, but experience, and preferences have whittled that number to 120. So when so many images are ruined by unthinking 'Artists'.....I have to say something.
This lass, unfortunately didn't make the cut. Not because she was unworthy, but simply because YOU destroyed what could have been a great set, with your 'Artistic Flare'.
Wednesday, January 27th, 2016 on Presenting Julia Steel
110+ for your comments, DeeDee. When a set doesn't turn out, in general terms, the onus is on the photog. Occasionally, a model will just 'not like' the people she's working with.
Thursday, January 7th, 2016 on Prosina
Personally, I am 100% behind Ian. I'm pretty sure, if you were at dinner in front of 300+ people, you would not stand and raise your glass and say to Angelique J or J-lo, or any other woman for that matter, "I want to fuck you!" for all and sundry to hear. But this is what is happening at M-A today. And it's not pretty reading.
These women get paid well, I hope, for entertaining us. But they should not be subjected to the vile comments made by vermin who think their depraved, obnoxious and obscene comments are 'cute'.
Beautifully written _fer_realz_ and much more politely put than I could/would have.
When I first saw Leah - in her debut, I thought what a fantastic girl, and the theme impressed me.
My trouble with Charles is, I am 21 going on 80, I appreciate the beauty of the lasses on MA and elsewhere, but I cannot read braille. So I think most of the guys who have responded favorably to these sets, including that of Alex Lynn - 25/11/2015, must be blind and view these images by running their fingertips over the grain that obliterates the pictures for normal viewers.
Friday, December 11th, 2015 on Voccan
Makayla is a beautiful young woman who could continue to grace these pages for years to come. She has the looks, the smile and the style to provide entertainment for decades.
For her to present herself as outgoing and unselfish as she did in her first set, set the standard extremely high. Photographer and model worked unison and total harmony in every image.
But I think Alejandro let the team down in this new set, by not giving Makayla the license react as pro-actively or emotionally, as she did the first time round.
For me, Makayla gets a 10+ simply because she is Makayla. Alejandro gets an 8 - for not quite reaching the high standard of his model's enthusiasm.
But hey, this IS Makayla, and I'm delighted to see her any which way:)
Sunday, December 6th, 2015 on Argoe
So many perfectly scripted comments about this set and the exceptionally beautiful and talented Ardelia:)
I had been off-line for a couple of weeks, and by the time I got back here, there was a lot of catching up to do, so I haven't yet had time to really look at the set. What I have seen has been spectacular, the signature of Arkisi's brilliance.
Adding to Ardelia's undeniable beauty, is her work ethic. Her unselfish commitment to bring her mind, body and soul on to the set is obvious in the images both she and Arkisi have presented to us.
Ardelia is the first of my "Perfect 10' models to be delivered on my birthday, so that makes this set especially special.
Thank you Ardelia and Arkisi;)
Friday, November 27th, 2015 on Nepira
I'm with you Picture Lover, that photogs should be allowed to experiment - this is not the first experiment that I've seen, and I agree too, that this experiment failed - as did the others - IMO.
This set didn't turn out right, but the theme and model are spot on.
These images, photographed and lit properly, would be stunning.
Leah is Hotter than HOT, I would venture to say, but the noise in these shots do her no justice whatsoever.
Saturday, October 31st, 2015 on Presenting Leah Gotti
And Rose, that is an understatement:)
I could devour this woman for a decade of 1000 years, and still find areas I love.
Your sentiments are well-founded, You Betcha:)
Monday, July 20th, 2015 on Lenida
The Perfect Garment/Color for your complexion and setting:)
While I DO love to see you naked, I Love you as much in sensuous lingerie. That said, you would make a hessian potato sack look glamorous:)
Sexy Lingerie, indoors, on a bed, with your hair disheveled, all over the place and looking like you have just had the greatest experience of your life, because you are sex personified, sex on legs - and I've never said that about anyone before.
It's impossible for me to have too many shots of you. Too many is not enough.
Your love-struck fan,
Monday, July 20th, 2015 on Direktilo
Open letter to Flavia/Larissa - a Rose by any name.
It has been a Long Time since I last ranted like a love-struck school boy, but you, Lovely Lady, have brought back the days of my youth:)
I have close to 1000 M-A models in various HD's, one being my Perfect 10's, in alphabetical order, of which there are 112 beautiful woman.
Flavia/Larissa, you are my Number One Most Desirable Young Woman. Going through your sets recently, I created two columns, "What's Not to Like" and "What I DO Like".
The "What's not to like" column remain M/T:) The other is loaded, FULL:)
From the color of your hair, it's length, eyebrows, eyes, nose, lips, teeth, shoulders, breasts, hips, legs and feet, you are Angelic Perfection.
I just wish I had twice as many sets and twice as many videos of you than I have.
You are the Creator of Wet Dreams for all men, and for more than a few women too, I'd bet.
Stay safe, and please, return SOON:)
Your most adoring fan,
Special Thanks to the Photographers who have provided us with such delightful images of your perfection, Leonardo, Rylsky, Arkisi, et al.
P.S. While I am a Leg Man and the Treasure they protect, your breasts are Immaculate, Desirable and Perfect.
The fact that you're also intelligent is the Seal of your Beauty:)
Monday, July 20th, 2015 on Flavia A
I vote with the majority here, Arkisi, except for the limp-dicked twat of a dog at the end.
Your sets always have a good balance from head to toe imho.
But we DO need more sets of this delectable Miss. Dulcia is truly outstanding, absolutely Top Shelf.
As soon as you can please!! It's been a drab 6 months without her.
Thursday, May 28th, 2015 on Dulcia
Such comments and enthusiasm for a truly stunning young woman!!
We are no doubt wondering, (I know I am), how such a delectably gorgeous, talented model could be ignored for 23 straight months!!:(
Sad times at M-A:(
Tuesday, May 26th, 2015 on Demetra A
What the hell are you complaining about????? I will take Flavia in anything at all, or naked. This woman is beautiful no matter haw you see her.
Tuesday, April 28th, 2015 on Flavia A
So GLAD to see you back dear Flavia. Please do not be a stranger for so long again:)
Of the 112 models I have listed alphabetically, Flavia is my stand-out Favorite: The phrase that best describe her is ...."Sex on Legs"....
IMHO, Flavia is not just beautiful, she is Stunningly so. No matter who she works with, Flavia has the most diverse looks of any other model on the internet.
The one thing that separates Flavia from the other models is her willingness to participate in the shoot. She is totally without ego, remains confident in her skin, knows what these sites are all about and goes about her work without embarrassment or fear. She understands what the viewer is looking for and sets out to deliver right from the first image.
Flavia is every man's 'wet dream', especially mine and from the soles of my feet, I Thank Her for sharing her glorious body with us. That said, I have to thank her photographers for presenting these wonderful sets to us.
She has been off our radar for more than 12 months @ Met-Art, which almost killed me, so Rylsky, Thank You, for returning her to her rightful place as the Queen of Met-Art:)
Thank You Flavia, for bringing your perfect beauty back to us.
Tuesday, April 28th, 2015 on Lenida
Davi, I should have paid more attention to your words back in May 2014:(
I followed Vanessa's first four sets and flagged her as a 'maybe'.
After seeing a new post of her today and just out of curiosity, I went to her page, and noticed 3 new sets. Honestly, Asimila didn't make me change my mind, but when I opened Naesma, I was Blown Away:)
Being a 'leg' man, I check ankles, calves, thighs if the girl is wearing a mini skirt, then her eyes. Because what I am really after is that secret place tucked away securely between a nice set of pins.
What You and Vanessa gave us in Naesma, that set was mind blowingly erotic. I am now unashamedly addicted to Vanessa.
Only one disappointing feature, if I may venture to say - I hate, Hate,HATE, being dumped into a tub of icy water at the end of these sets. I like to end on a high of delightful pussy shots, rather than the model dressed in swathes of clothing. Just a thought:)
Thank you Vanessa for expressing your emotions without restraint. The images are a wonderful and a delight to behold.
Thank you Davi, for instilling in Vanessa, the confidence and security this work demands.
Tuesday, March 10th, 2015 on Vanessa Angel
Jessica can only wish...... :)
But I still miss Selestina! :(
Friday, March 6th, 2015 on Leda
I only saw the first 4 pages of Leda's first set, before deciding to add her to my Perfect 10's folder. These are models who, in my opinion are pretty sensational.
Leda's first set belies her lack of experience. She was confident, honest and worked with Albert like a seasoned pro.
I love a woman in lingerie, and we got plenty of that here. She is adorable in every image, though someone suggested she was a little shy in showing her 'top half'. that it took 'the 83rd image before we saw her breasts'.
Perhaps she was a little shy, though she had no reason to be. Standing just 5' 6", her 33in bust was not out of proportion. Would have been for a 6 footer though:)
Albert, I have just downloaded both of Leda's sets, and I am looking forward with much enthusiasm of seeing them all for the first time. You have set the bar extremely high in the original set. It's going to be hard for both of you to maintain that standard.
I reckon you both deserve 10's. And Leda, at 8.44 where you are now, you'll go much higher. If you aren't # 1 in the next few months, I'm going to eat my hat.
Welcome to Met-Art Leda and Thank you Albert, for introducing her.
I agree my friend. EL has done much better work and frankly, I am going off him fast.
He used to get his models involved in their sessions, but over sadly, the last 18 months, he has taken to heart the Pathetic Pommie Poofters view, that women are just objects. They're forbidden to have feelings and to show any emotion if it involves their personal enjoyment is an absolute no no!!. (Check out Rose' blog of 14/12/12014)
I thought we tossed those pathetic sicko's into the Atlantic in 1776 or there-about. It's time we did it again!!
Friday, March 6th, 2015 on Dakema
Hip Hip HOORAY:) My sentiments exactly, hipshot131!!
Friday, March 6th, 2015 on Presenting Leda
Well guys, it's time the truth were told:( This set, as in most 'beach' shoots, is totally BORING.
I take my hat off to Ian Thomas & Czechmate2. They nailed it.
Met-Art, by their own definition, is an 'Erotic, Soft Porn' site, but neither was in evidence here.
News Flash - unless you're masochists, there is nothing LESS sexy, than a vagina filled with sand. So no, with going on 60% of her work involving sand, I am not a fan.
Czechmate2 said her two highest rating sets were indoors. This is not surprising, because a woman cannot feel soft and inviting, when her hair, eyes, ears and pussy are sand-encrusted.
Simply put, Mango looks a hell of a lot sexier dressed in lingerie, than she does covered in sand.
Thursday, February 26th, 2015 on Layimi
Dear Mr. Varin,
Australia is a bit of an island, often called an island continent, because it is minutely smaller than mainland USA, lies just kilometers from the Equator. Surely, it's most northern tip, Cape York is but an hour's flight away.
When you posted your last set of the sensational Selestina back in October 2014, we were in the middle of Spring. 4 months later, after a summer in the high 30°C - close to a 100°F, these have been the coldest months I have experienced since you brought this beauty to us in 8 lonely sets ago.
You have introduced some new models, but none have the devastating sexuality of Selestina.
I am going to need her warmth during the coming winter months when it gets down to close to 1° at night.
Please consider posting further work with her, and a video or two would not go astray - rather, they would be greatly appreciated.
Thursday, February 12th, 2015 on Coeldy
Actually hip, I think it is worse. I think Leo is insulting Olivian by not presenting her perfection 'in focus'. IMHO, there is no such thing as Romantic, Soft-focus. It's mediocre work and total B/S.
Sunday, January 25th, 2015 on Presenting Olivian
Leonardo is a bit of a conundrum. When he is on his game, he can be brilliant, but all too often, he lets his 'Artistic Buffoonery' loose. This, unfortunately, is another example of this stupidity.
For this 'hilarious' (as suggested by vger), 'pussy macro' guy, I find the most erotic images are those close-up pussy shots that show her in perfect clarity. What is even more erotic, is when she is so confident with her crew, and loving her work and surroundings to such a degree her excitement is evident with a cream-filled vagina.
I am with hip, with his observation, there is only one clear, from behind pussy shot - the whole set is boring, but that is not a fault of Olivian, who is truly gorgeous and deserves better from a photographer of Leonardo's standing and experience.
Leona Honey is aptly named. She is a real honey, and I'd bet, she tastes and flows......just like Honey:)
Saturday, January 10th, 2015 on Leona Honey
Hey, Albert. How's this for a change of pace??
I am unashamedly a leg-man. I like a nice cleavage, but I always notice ankles, calves and thighs first. It's a huge plus if she has a beautiful face and clean hair. Then comes the cleavage.
So, my friend, I was disappointed in this set, in that it wasn't of the same high standard you set in Leona's first set. My opinion only:)
In her first set, Leona had spread her gorgeous legs and pleasingly, so too her pussy. Sadly, in this set, I counted only three partial pussy shots. She was obviously enjoying herself because she was slightly wet, but no obvious display of liberation (which I crave), as in the first set.
Saturday, January 10th, 2015 on Chirica
Do you have any idea of what a 'Troll' is??
They are nasty, dwarfish pieces of shit who live in stagnant swampy areas, intent on doing harm to others, either in word or deed.
So no, I don't think Albert Should listen to trolls, because they are always so wrapped up in their tiny little egos, they make little sense when they do speak.....or write, for that matter.
You, yin-yang, have the very core of being a troll. In two statements written here, one was petty and sarcastic, the other an outright lie. The lie being - 'they may have valuable information.'
It's a sad fact that there are others here of your ilk, and not one has had anything sane, sensible or valuable to say.
Albert, you are one of a very few photographers here who fits the description of 'Artist'. I have never seen a set of yours where your ego has detracted from the work at hand. Too many snappers on this site allow their egos to overtake their ability, and the results are often disastrous - to the point of insulting both their models and M-A's subscribers.
This set of Leona is another set of high integrity, bringing us another exceptionally beautiful young woman for our viewing pleasure.
It's obvious that you have a great working-relationship with your models as they all appear relaxed, confident and happy in their environment. They are also involved in the shoot. As Leona shows here, she is aware of what is expected of her and willing to accommodate us.
Please do not hesitate in bring her back.....Often:)
Saturday, January 10th, 2015 on Presenting Leona Honey
Perhaps you two are at the wrong site. Sounds like Playboy is more your style? Beautiful girls, great photography, real tits and arse, and you'll never have to suffer 'crotch' shots:)
After 70+ years on this planet, I have a pretty liberal view on pornography, and no matter that M-A purports to be 'soft-porn' I see no pornography in the naked human form. Seeing a woman turned on and enjoying her shoot is a wondrous thing. So I am pleased when a photographer gets his model involved in the shoot, instead of just using her as an object, or as a means to an end, as Latika has here.
If 'crotch' shots are so offensive to you, turn your viewing to Catherine, Angela Linen, Natasha Schon, Goncharov and there are many others who are ignorant of the pleasure derived from seeing a beautiful woman whose red-hot pussy is wet with desire.
Wednesday, January 7th, 2015 on Mirine
Absolutely true. I think the reason could have something to do with the fact this bloated buffoon's are listed here as 'Artists'! The majority seem to be little more than walking ego's with a camera - (WEWC's)!
Katie is a Perfect 10, but this fact has not been a consideration by the snapper at any stage of this shoot. It's been all about his clownish idea of 'Art'.
While I agree Nordica is a sensational beauty, the set was going great until she was dumped into that murky water. What is it with these guys??
Thursday, December 25th, 2014 on Demile
At Last!! Diana G has Finally been photographed honestly!! In this Gorgeous set, Diana has not been portrayed as a mere object of perfection, but as a really beautiful woman with emotions:) I can at last, elevate her to my 'Perfect 10' list:) Thank you Koenart for not deleting these images!
Now you might like to work with another "Exclusive" model you work with, Adriana F and do the same honest work with her!!
Wednesday, December 24th, 2014 on Diseno
You can please some of the people some of the time....
I love the setting, because Adiana would turn a slum into a palace.
However, I AM disappointed in Koenart's inability to bring out Adriana's obvious sensuality. She is 'Sex on Legs' - a fact that Koenart fails to see.
Wednesday, December 24th, 2014 on Krima
Conversely, I think the reeds make for a great set. Adriana is the epitome of perfection, and will enhance ANY setting. Sure, subscribe to NG - but you'll never find the likes of this set there:)
I'm with you though, about Koenart. He/she fails to bring out the best of this gracious young woman.
Your work with Adriana is idyllic Koenart, except when you deceive us:(
In the 12 sets to date, you have not and nor has she, been shy in presenting her pussy for our admiration.
Unfortunately, it seems you have been bitten by the bug which destroys Catherine's work. You're denying Adriana's sensuality, and that is a shame.
In this set, (12 - Prolato), Adriana finally has expressed some emotion during the shoot, but you have decided to edit the offending images, or waited for the moment to pass, clean her up and continue. I am referring to image #'s 105 & 106. It is obvious that Adriana has been emotionally explicit, but those moments have not been recorded:(
I am not a 'Big Boob' fan, but more interested in brains and legs - and the 'honey-pot' guarded by a nice pair of thighs:)
There is Nothing on this earth more erotic than a woman in full-bloom with the evidence of her emotion flowing:)
Adriana F is a 10:) I'd LOVE to elevate her to a 'Perfect 10' :)
Wednesday, December 24th, 2014 on Prolato
I have been a long-time follower of your work as in many instances you have had your models, in a word, .emotionally' involved in the set. Jazz put it much more eloquently in his final paragraph, about excitement, pensiveness and oblivion to the outside world. That's where your models so often are - relaxed and able to 'let loose' so to speak.
As for the size of the set, let me just say, there is never enough of a good thing, especially when the subject just happens to be a beautiful woman. Prior to 2012 - possibly M-A's most insidiously dictatorial year, sets often came in at 200+:) Yes, that made me smile, because I was collecting, and viewing feminine beauty and perfection. In 2012 they demanded sets to be of 120 images, genitalia if portrayed, was to be blurred, and in no way, was the model to be portrayed enjoying the moment to the point of arousal.
And that is the most important aspect of all as far as I'm concerned. For a set to be perfect, the model has to be enjoying herself, be relaxed in her surroundings, and with confidence enough in her photographer to be carefree with her emotions.
In closing, I have included a new word in my 70-year-old mental dictionary. 'Desaturated'. WOW!!:) All these years, I've been calling it 'muddy':( On page 7, image #144 (by my calculation), you have a close-up of Vanessa's genitalia. The image has been 'desaturated', but IMHO, it just look plain dirty. Albert Varin did the same thing with another of my 'Perfect 10's' recently, and it really did wreck the tenor of the entire set.
As an enthusiastic collector of erotica and someone knowledgeable with a camera, I know there is a certain 'Licence to Create', but I hope you will reconsider desaturating future images of Feminine Perfection.
Thank you for your time. Cheers, Rich.
Friday, December 12th, 2014 on Semov
I have to agree with the comments made by By Man & Dave C. IMHO, ANGELIKA is a Triple A+ young lady who has style, grace and beauty.
Paramov has to learn how to get this model to communicate to US. All these sets could have been shot using a department store dummy, so lacking in skill has Paramov to get the 'essence' of this site, and of his model.
To Angelika - AAA+
To Paramov - F- That said, he gets an A+ for finding, and presenting her to us.
Friday, November 14th, 2014 on Angelika D
Albert my friend, I am about to expire:( I have been holding my breath for 16 months, in excited anticipation for a 2nd, 3rd and more, sets of the enticing Roshelle.
I can't understand how you could let this beautiful young lady drop off your radar after such a fabulous entrance.
The answer to the Global Warming nightmare is pretty obvious. It has to do with all those Gorgeous Young Women that make the sun shine in the Northern Hemisphere, (even when it's snowing), to which group, Roshelle obviously belongs.
Please Mr. Varin, would you make time in your busy schedule, to scour the Planet, find Roshelle, and shoot her many more times:)
Thanking you in advance. Rich.
Friday, October 10th, 2014 on Roshelle A
Nika's bio is a stuff-up in more than just her statistics. For her to have those figures, she'd need to be about 10" across her shoulders. They also give her breast size as medium - 28" bust on a 5' 5" frame? Go figure!! No pun intended:) Recently seen a 5' 3" model 89cm/35" bust had "small" breasts, Jeez!!
Where M-A have stuffed up more seriously with Nika, they have not attributed her with a brain. She has not been offered or has not expressed an opinion on anything in her bio. What a model has to say is as important to me as her statistics.
Friday, August 8th, 2014 on Nika N
Poor Sally:( She wasn't given much of a chance earlier, But you have opened this beauty to the stunning young woman she is!! Sally's 'rediscovery' is most welcome - I'm looking forward to seeing lots more of this redhead - and I'm not a great fan of the bush, but in Sally's case, I make an exception!!:)
Thanks Deltagamma, and Sally, for sharing:)
I don't know what difference my 10 did to her score, but 7.13 and climbing.
Having accidentally already seen her set of July 17th, her score should sky-rocket. Here's hoping!!
Thursday, July 17th, 2014 on Sally A
One of the most beautiful sets I've seen on M-A for months. This set has everything. The timing of the shoot is perfect. Sally is so confident and free, spiritually and emotionally. Your decision to let Sally loose and not destroy her mood with direction proved to be a great one.
It is pretty obvious that Sally has complete trust in you to enable her to pose as erotically and naturally as she has.
A stupendous set:) Congratulations on the result, and Thankyou both for sharing.
But I now have a problem - where am I going to locate the rest of her work?:)
Thursday, July 17th, 2014 on Sensione
You young pups have obviously grown up with the shaved pussy, and have NO IDEA on what it was like growing up with the tangled mess and having to fight through unkempt undergrowth to find the lips and nectar held within.
As much as I enjoy romantic lighting in a restaurant, I STILL like to see what I am eating. And a clean pussy is a far greater aphrodisiac than a dozen 'Natural' oysters 'in the shell' any day:)
Thursday, July 10th, 2014 on Presenting Victoriya
I support your comments 100% hipshot131. I'm certain we will be blessed with a more intimate view of this lass as her confidence grows and she relaxes more with experience. Karolina is a vision of beauty, so thanks to her and Matiss for this first up session.
Monday, July 7th, 2014 on Presenting Karolina Young
The question begs to be asked, Why has an enterprising photographer not added this succulent young woman to other sites affiliated to M-A?
The list of IwC (Idiots with Camera) is far greater here, than the list of what M-A broadly calls 'Artists'. So any of the following are worthy of working with Yarina, and adding her to sites like TheLifeErotic and Sex-Art. Tony Murano, Don Caravaggio or Vicente Silva, Deltagamma, Flora or Arturo. Others include Albert Varin, Alex Iskan, Alex Sironi, Leonardo, Marlene or Mattiss.
Yarina deserves a far wider audience than she currently has:) So let's shoot!!
Wednesday, July 2nd, 2014 on Yarina A
Beautiful does not describe you adequately. Totally under-states your exquisite gorgeousness. Someone mentioned your ponytail in the comments of your first set with Albert Varin. I never noticed. Your flawless skin, crystal clear eyes, succulent mouth, perfect teeth, beautiful curves, (in the 60's Marilyn Monroe's 36/24/36 figure was supposed to be perfection, but guess what - MY Perfect Figure is 35/24/35!!:)
Your beauty and uninhibited enthusiasm towards your work will turn this site 360° on its axis - and that is not before time. Your freshness is like new pasture, freshly cut and smelling like roses. If you're not a rural girl, you really ought to take some time in the country. There is no other area quite like it:)
Thankyou Etna (Voluptuous Krakatoa), for sharing.
Saturday, June 28th, 2014 on Etna
I think the greatest compliment obtainable for a photographer is for his model to be so confident and relaxed during the shoot, she can let nature take its course.
Those of us lucky enough to have viewed this set have been doubly blessed. Not only has Albert photographed this set honestly, Etna has been an avid participant, not merely an object. So we get the perfection of Albert's work, enhanced by Etna's enthusiasm and spontaneity.
So from the bottom of our collective hearts, Albert, thank you for presenting this ultra feminine, sexy little Fox so delightfully:)
Etna, Thank you for presenting yourself with such uninhibited and gay abandon.
You are Everyman's sexual fantasy personified. Great work with Albert.
And I'm looking for MORE, from you two. Even a video or four:)
P.S. Etna, the last volcano to erupt significantly was Krakatoa in Indonesia a decade or two before 1900. So for me, you're called Etna, aka Krakatoa:) It is still active, and could go off any time soon - as I hope you will again - soon:)
Saturday, June 28th, 2014 on Presenting Etna
But seriously, aren't we all? Wouldn't we all?? I am, and I seriously would:) We ARE talking about the volcano right?? I thought not!!;)
Sorry I didn't notice you were missing Catherine, but this is the first set of yours that I have opened in 18 months, and only because you were 'Presenting' a new model. Your style has not changed one iota in this period, and you continue on as the Mistress of Mediocrity.
Technically, your work is great, your models absolutely beautiful, as Xena is here. But you Never get them 'involved' in the shoot and they turn out as animated as a department store dummy, with the same amount of eroticism.
Tuesday, June 17th, 2014 on Presenting Xena
Yeah, rachsback, 5' 4" and 106lbs. Nici IS the Perfect "Little Woman". But her measurements read 39/23/35. Well, 39 inches on that cute little body, would be extraordinarily large. But that's not the case. She is probably 35 or 36 inches, but her small hands make her seem larger.
Sorry about the earlier double tap on my post. Won't happen again:)
Sunday, June 15th, 2014 on Reijar
I'm with you, with that sentiment. Like most female photographers, Luca (short for Lucretia?), has no idea how to get her models personally involved. Like Catherine, who'se work many rave about, shoots amazing department store dummies. Technically, their work is great, but their models are totally inanimate, still-life. Like candles around a bathtub, you can see them, but not a flicker of movement.
When I was given a camera in 1949, I was 5yo. My mother told me to make sure I never cut off the top of my subject's head, and to ensure I didn't have anything, trees, poles etc, sprouting from the top of their head. It was good advice, that seems to be totally ignored by modern day snappers - including most of those here at M-A. Most will excuse their laziness as "artistic inspiration', but it IS pure laziness, and not in the least, artistic.
It says a lot for Malinda's personal qualities that she is one of a few models that has presented perfect sets for all 5 photographers she has worked with, and that she hasn't missed a month since her first back in May 2013.
When I mention her personal qualities, I'm not talking about her obvious feminine contours and attributes. Her enthusiasm, effervescence and relaxed attitude from the very first set is a benchmark seldom reached from one so young. I guess we can thank her large and obviously happy family:)
It is sad though, that she has shot only one video - with Marlene. It's a video off the planet in pure eroticism, sensuality and Girl Next Door perfection and innocence. I hope Malinda conspires with Marlene to produce another very soon:)
Saturday, June 7th, 2014 on Malinda A
Another mind-blowing set from the Exquisite Selestina. Great photography from the Incomparable Albert Varin. Thank you Albert, for keeping the set so natural.
Thursday, June 5th, 2014 on Kazmy
Koenart. Does anything more really need to be said?
Tuesday, May 13th, 2014 on Presenting Lory
Not Rylsky's fault!! Blame it on those puritanical shit-heads at M-A. They saw his previous set, and Venere's obvious excitement, and told him to tone it down. That's why this set is so bloody deplorable.
These models and photographers should remember that without our subscriptions, who is going to pay the rent? The power, the telephone, the internet et all?
Stuff it, who pays the wages at M-A? Where does the money come from?? Where does the money come from to pay the photographers and models.
From us, their subscribers, that's where!! And those dictatorial Nazi dick-licking puritanical poofter clods haven't gotten their bullshit morality off the Mayflower yet!!!
Monday, May 12th, 2014 on Agbaye
In a word, Bullshit. Maybe I'm looking at different sets from Rylsky that you are mate, but he has posted crap images to M-A, just as most other shooters have.
I haven't, nor would I EVER subscribe to Rylsky-Art for two reasons.
Firstly, for his insane penchant to immerse his models in water torture in the name of art, and secondly, because I made the crack-pot decision to join Arkisi's Eternal Desire, only to find his sets range from under 40 to sometimes over 90, images per set.
Either way, I consider my subscription to E-D a waste of money because of the set size, and because he frequently submits far superior work to M-A, than he does to E-D. Conversely, his videos are better on E-D than M-A.
In close-up photography, my camera gives me a rectangle pof, which I can cover the specific area I want sharp with. Half a shutter button depression allows me to change the angle up, down or sideways. I can also move the focal length. But that point of focus remains the same, no matter what else I do with the camera. I can promise you, Rylsky is using much better equipment than I do.
Monday, May 12th, 2014 on Cermery
Correction: ......women WERE no longer allowed...... Sorry:-(
Monday, May 12th, 2014 on Presenting Venere
2012 was a black year for the subscribers to Met-Art. It was the year the 'Powers That Be' there, decided that women we no longer allowed to be endowed with a vagina. It was the year those 50 employees at Met-Art decided that a woman's sexuality was a 'dirty' thing and was to be obliterated from ALL Erotic Glamour sets, for which M-A had become universally known.
We put up with sets like this one of Venere A, where there are maybe 3 shots of her labia. Other than that, this beautiful young woman is little more than a department store dummy. That's not Rylsky's fault, and certainly not Venere's fault. The fault lies squarely at those puritanical dick-licking arseholes at Met-Art.
Fortunately, Rylsky over-rode the insanity with a set (I'm sure it was Alyssa A0, with a very open and decidedly wet vagina. Other photographers soon followed suit. Openly shooting their model in a state of excitement if not arousal.
Unfortunately, the Nazi bastards at Met-Art soon put a stop to that. The imagery was fine, but any wetness between the models' legs was to be cleaned up, meaning the model could be aroused, but not SEEN to be so.
Some photographers pushed the envelope (Albert Varin and Selestina, Presenting 15112013), where she practically exploded during the set. There have been many others with one-off sets like AV & S, but M-A's dictum soon prevails and as with Albert & Selestina, the sets become less and less erotic. Apart from one image, their latest outing would be rated PG at worst.
So it's about time that Met-Art was told, bluntly, that without their subscribers, none of them would have a job. The SUBSCRIBERS, pay their wages, those of the photographer who can then pay their model. Met-Art brag that the photographers and models are the best paid in the industry. Make Met-Art earn their millions by removing ALL limitations on the crews on the sets shoot that which natural, with no interference.
Met-Art, you dictatorial, puritanical slobs, you are no longer on the Mayflower!! Even the Victorians had more sense than you people. Let the Photographer do his job, and more importantly, let Nature take its Course, with NO human interference!!!!
This is a great concept Egon, and beautifully portrayed. You created an adorable Little Red Riding Hood Laya, soft and vulnerable, yet confident at the same time. A gorgeous debut and I'm enthusiastic about opening your next set:-)
Sunday, May 4th, 2014 on Presenting Laya
Rylsky, what sort of Aryan German Supremest arsehole are you??
It seems to me, you consider every model you work with is Jewish, therefore, has to be cleansed prior to evacuation to the Gas Chamber!!!!!
It would be NICE, if you could actually consider the amount of 'water torture' you submit your models to.
I'm pretty sure that few, to none, come to you in a dirty state.
So could it be you abhor their scent, or do you really consider women as a whole, to be dirty animals??
Women look, feel, and smell great, in their natural state you prick.
That is, unless you prefer little boys. Which I'm sure you must do.
That's a judgement made on your posts to date.
Monday, April 28th, 2014 on Deligty
So my reply is the same.
I don't know about where Doug is on this one, but there is sure as shit stinks, no need for a Thank You!!
I keep hoping that someone else will shoot with Nensi. She is a beautiful young woman who deserves better than Paramov's portrayal of a store-front dummy.
Wanting desperately to add her to my collection, I haven't yet seen a set with her by Paramov worth uploading.
Hipshot131 has found this egotistical, brain-dead drop-kick out. It's all about Paramov, and not about his model.
We've had enough of your crap Paramov. Shoot the girl as the human being she is, and not the plastic mannequin you prefer!!
Monday, April 28th, 2014 on Klinete
They say there's a rotten apple in every barrel, and here, I'm 'IT'.
Firstly, let it be known that I am not a 'Tit' man, so I cannot agree with any of you on the perfection of Evita's breasts. There are women on this site who's 36 inch breasts 'stand to attention', some are 'at ease', and a lot more who's breasts are just plain slothful, resting lazily on the rib-cage as they do here.
Taking it further, I do agree that she is beautiful in every other aspect. Face, mouth, hips, legs, and my favorite, her pussy. (I would just LOVE to know where that monika came from:-) It won't meow, scratch or hiss at you, but if you're lucky, it will spit at you:-).
Lastly, I agree with all who commented on her eyes. To say the least, they're unique, perhaps brought about through colored contacts????
Final comment, no Water Torture. Wonderful, Rylsky:-)
Monday, March 24th, 2014 on Presenting Evita Lima
There have been many models that have made stunning debut's on Met-art and other sites, here.
But IMHO and knowledge, none have made a more spectacular entrance than this 'Perfect 10", Selestina. But Selestina has trounced them all!!:-)
You have set an extremely high standard in erotica, Selestina, that I hope you can continue in your future work.
Thank you for sharing your beauty, emotions and free-spirit with us.
Thank you too, Albert, for instilling such confidence in Selestina that made this creative set possible.
Saturday, February 8th, 2014 on Selestina A
And even Better Done GEA:-)
You are absolutely right though, The model's excitement shows her trust in her artist, the enjoyment of her work, and the fact that she just loves to tease the stuffing out of us:-) And that is my satisfaction, desiring the unobtainable, yet it remains desirable and totally pleasurable.
Monday, January 20th, 2014 on Klassie
Outstanding first-up set:-) Sensational second, and an "off-the-planet" Third set. It's a pity it is not on video!!
Thank You, Matiss, for bringing this delicious beauty to our attention. (I'm in raptures, personally:-)
And Thank You, Erica, for sharing your stunning beauty in such a wonderfully uninhibited nature.
Videos, plural, would be good. Indoor work is now a must, but PLEASE, no bath or shower scenes!! This lady's body is too perfect to be distorted in water:-)
Thursday, January 9th, 2014 on Genevieve Gandi
Like Alyssa, Astenya, I would like to welcome you to M-A and congratulate you on your debut set with Albert Varin.
As with all his models, Albert has made you feel special, and part of the project, which shows in the enthusiasm you portray in this set.
I hope you sit for many more sets, and I'd like to see you in Sex-Art and The Life Erotic. A video of your work would also be appreciated.
Saturday, December 28th, 2013 on Astenya A
Congratulations Marlene & Kaylee, on a 10/10 set:-) A truly wondrous set of a beautiful model, stunningly photographed by Marlene, who knows how to make her subjects feel a lot more than mere department store dummy's.
Wednesday, December 25th, 2013 on Allopi
I hope someone soon wakes up and puts a video camera in front of this Angel of the Universe:-)
Leonardo (much to his credit, and to my delight), continues to create exquisite stills with Linden.
IMHO, together, their work is nothing short of sensational.
10/10 to both of you on all your sets so far.
But a video or 12 would be amazing. Leonardo? Fenix? Arkisi? Who's going to be first to create a masterpiece in videography with this perfectly proportioned, stunningly exquisite, young & beautiful Linden?
Thursday, December 19th, 2013 on Linden A
Arrogant. What an absolutely fitting description of you, Rylsky:-))
Reading through the comments of your last insidiously insulting (to Astrud), set.
I have never met Astrud, and that is a huge disappointment to me, but two things I would bet my life on, she has never fronted you dirty or smelly. She would have presented herself clean, made-up and ready to work and do your bidding.
And then you put her through your insidiously insulting (to her and us), water-torture.
Give it a break, you one-dimensional prick. If your mental powers can think of nothing better than water to set you model in, go shoot still-life, landscapes, ANYTHING!! But leave a beautiful woman well alone!!
Saturday, December 14th, 2013 on Astrud A
Sorry, 5seadog, I don't know how many pubs you've got, and I'm pretty sure it wouldn't make an iota of difference if you had none. Try pubes:-)
Saturday, December 14th, 2013 on Hefydi
JESUS H freaking CHRISTOPHER!!! What a wonderful, simple word!! ARROGANT!!
Fits Rylsky to a 'T'!!!! Bloody ARROGANT. A perfect description Azrael. Thank You!!
Yeah!! I saw something of Milana D, (our very own M-A model) @
Hegre, where she went/suffered through 40 minutes of pure, unadulterated HELL, getting her pussy waxed. Waxing doesn't just remove hair, it removes layers of skin as well!!
My bet is 5seadog hasn't the balls he was born with, to go through that excruciatingly painful experience even on a dime-size area of his own bush.
Now THERE'S an idea!! 5seadog!! Go get YOUR pubs waxed, under video scrutiny, and tell us all how funny it is.
But not in this set.
Congratulations, kanobione, for hitting the nail right on the head. Yours is the first, truly HONEST evaluation of this deplorable set of an unusually adorable and attractive young woman.
I bow to your astute perception, sir.
You are absolutely right, Neil. She is all you say and more. It's just the setting she has been subjected to, that destroys this set.
Rubbish. Fewer images/photos, the more obviously posed and un-natural the set will be!!
Learn to LOOK at the images. In the larger sets, you will soon pick out subtle differences, if you have eyes to see.
Somebody Finally writing, and Making, complete and utter sense!! Thank you, hipshot131
The images in the larger sets need not be repetitive to the trained eye. They only look the same to people glancing at but not inspecting each individual image.
That being said, Rylsky is repetitive, and for this reason, I would never spend a cent on his site.
Rylsky's repetition is not in the images he takes, but in the location in which he takes them. His repulsive obsession with water, is bordering on, if not an already full-blown addiction, just like an alcoholic being unable to enter a bar and not have a drink, a gambler not being able to resist placing a bet.
Rylsky CAN'T photograph any model, without subjecting her, and us, with the girl looking more like drowned rat, than the exciting young woman she should be.
If Rylsky is not shooting his model in some form of water set, he is not in his comfort zone. And this makes him very much a one-dimensional photographer.
Arkisi too, @ Eternal Desire, is a case in point of small sets. EVERY image looks posed and un-natural. I look at his 40-60 image sets and see a stage-hand moving this leg, another to shift this hand, another to change the angle of her head, etc, etc. Instead of shooting 150 images of his model moving naturally. It's not Glamour, it's not natural, and it sure as HELL, is not erotic. And neither is Rylsky's obsession with water.
He needs to see a shrink, to find out what causes this dysfunction and get it sorted!!!!
Mia D is the most under-rated model on M-A!! She is missing from Errotic Archives, Eternal Desire, Sex-Art, The Life Erotic and Erotic Beauty. So let's see you photographers expand her sensational portfolio. Too Much is never enough of this stunningly gorgeous, innocent young woman. More vids too!!! Her work so far with Leonardo, has been sexily sensational.
Friday, December 13th, 2013 on Mia D
Look at who photographed this mess, ziggyzaq. It's not Belinda's fault!! It's the idiot behind the camera!!
What shits me more than anything else, my subs, and yours, help PAY this clown to produce the rubbish she does!!!!
Friday, December 13th, 2013 on Berriena
The shoes are merely props in a god-awful set from Linin. Belinda neither stands nor walks in these shoes, thankfully. As as erotic/glamour photographer, she'd make a bloody good dish-washer. And on THAT topic, here's a hint. She'd never be employed in my kitchen. A total waste of band-width from the first shot to the last. Beautiful model, third-rate snapper.
There's an old quote that comes from the WW2 military - "Who called the cook a bitch?" Answer, "Who called the bitch a cook?" Here we have, "Who called the photographer an idiot?" Reply, "Who called.............!"
This site is supposed to be about Eroticism, Glamour and Soft porn. Linin misses the mark completely and consistently. And she's been around long enough to know better. The only female on this site to complete the 'Grand Slam' is Flora. So my hat is doffed to her.
Thanks to Arkisi for his mastery of the erotic, and to Cathleen for her uninhibited freedom of expression, this set is a stunning work of art.
It's been said before, Arkisi, that you really do shoot the most exquisite models around.
But before I go spouting Cathleen's delightful attributes, not the least being her willingness to out-pour her emotions, let's not forget some of the others. Like Cathleen, Hilda A was an immediate Top Ten appointee:-)
So Thank You Cathleen, for presenting yourself so completely, and Arkisi, for making her so comfortable and at ease, Cathleen was confident enough to let herself relax and Go With the Flow.
How amazing would it be if this set were also available in video!!
Triple A's all round:-) Judges voted Perfect 10's.
Saturday, November 23rd, 2013 on Presenting Cathleen
Not to mention your pants:-)
Tuesday, November 12th, 2013 on Gimaj
Tracy, if I may say, you're 10/10 in looks, personality and professionalism. It's a pity you have stuck with a couple of guys with cameras, just wanting to get you naked and spreading your legs.
Both Majoly and Koenart have succeeded in your sets here, but didn't have a clue how to shoot you, once you had presented yourself. You are NOT just a department store dummy to be draped in pretty clothes as shown in these sets.
Just a tip, Alex Sironi, Alex Iskan, Rylsky or Leonardo are far better photographers and will treat you as the Angelic Princess that you are.
Wednesday, November 6th, 2013 on Tracy A
Red Fox, you would score 10/10 in any pageant for your flawless beauty.
You get 10/10 for you confidence and composure
and 10/10 for your utterly mesmerizing sexiness.
Thursday, October 31st, 2013 on Red Fox
Red Fox is a stunning beauty. Fresh, and uninhibited. It's not known how many shoots she has appeared in, but for a first time on M-A Red Fox has excelled. Her poses here are both provocative and vivacious. She is confident, without being ego-driven.
I give her 10/10 for her flawless beauty and 10/10 for this seductive set.
Erik gets 10/10 for bringing Red Fox to us, and 10/10 for his work with her here.
I would not be unhappy to see Red Fox appearing every month, for at least, the next decade. With a movie or two thrown in for good measure:-)
Thursday, October 31st, 2013 on Presenting Red Fox
Rylsky's art at it's best. You have portrayed the lovely Jeff Milton at her stunningly, arousing best. Her beauty is flawless, and you have captured her perfection as few others could. Thank you both for a perfect 10 set.
Monday, October 28th, 2013 on Estao
I too, would like to join RylskyArt, but I won't, because I don't like my models to be water-logged. I didn't down-load Jeff Milton immediately, though she is stunningly beautiful, because she had been doused with water. I changed my mind about her after seeing her second set, where she was photographed totally naturally. She was excited, showed it and that is what makes an average set an absolute stand-out.
My reasoning is this. When a woman is relaxed and comfortable in her surroundings, trusts her photographer and staff, and enjoying the shoot, she will get excited - unless she is totally emotionless. When a model let's nature take over, I know she is happy in her work, that her photographer has treated her as the Princess she is.
So, Mr. Rylsky, perhaps you might like to explain to me your 'Water Fetish', and why so many of your models are subjected to it. I don't think I'll be appreciating 'doused' models any more, but an understanding of your thinking would definitely be a great help.
There is no doubting your ability as a photographer or your artistry in relaxing your models. Now that 'the year of hell' is over, and we're seeing real models, feeling alive, instead of the robots of 2012, you are again, one of my favorite artists.
Monday, October 28th, 2013 on Jeff Milton
Just an insulting inference that Adriana was unclean when she arrived on set.
Personally, I am long over water/bubbles and anything else that detracts from or distorts the physical beauty of these gorgeous young women.
I loathe and detest this this style of shoot, and the lack of imagination showed by the shooter, in this case Koenart, who is not shooting in the class or style he did in 2011.
Perhaps, in the presence of Adriana's flawless beauty, Koenart finds himself out of his depth!!
Friday, October 25th, 2013 on Veneratie
HEY, Mr. Rylsky, Chloe D's return to this site is Long, Long over-due. It IS, as stated by Birthday Cake, almost 12 months since her initial appearance!!!!
Chloe D is a natural, who took great pleasure in her work, as one BADLY focused image, # 69 or 70 showed.
I assume it was at the behest of M-A, that all sets during 2012, that showed a woman's vagina, had to look like a dried up old prune, if showed at all. You showed in a set with Irina B, in March 2013, that you were 'over' that period, as were we, the subscribers!!
Please bring this Angel back, doing what she does best, being a 'little devil'.
Thanking you in advance. And next time, please get your priorities right when focusing your camera!!!!
Tuesday, October 22nd, 2013 on Presenting Chloe
A beautiful, simple video. Malinda is gorgeous in it, and perfectly shot by Marlene. I'd like to see you working together in a bedroom setting, where Malinda would be a lot more comfortable.
Monday, October 21st, 2013 on Wiyar
For Angela - Thank you . Wonderful set. GREAT work :-)
Monday, October 21st, 2013 on Mettere
You 'superior' bastard!! Calling the very core of a woman's sexuality a 'cunt' is the lowest, most degrading expression ever devised. I suppose you must be pitied for your lack of intelligence and worse, lack of vocabulary. I just think your are a low-life arsehole.
Have a little respect for the women who are prepared to present themselves here on M-A. They do not deserve to be abused the way you have abused Katie in your comments here!!
You are NOT 'superior' bobblehat, you're just a doormat.
Monday, October 21st, 2013 on Elavad
Nice little story smooth56:-) Halena certainly is an enticing, alluring little witch:-) She has surely captivated me with the lust for sex emanating from her seductive eyes, her saucy smile and her attention-demanding pussy. I would die a thousand happy deaths caught in her nest of hot, juicy delight.
Wednesday, October 16th, 2013 on Halena A
Leonardo has a camera which produces large images, but unfortunately has an ego the size of Europe. He also has the brain and artistic ability that would make a gnat cringe. He and Koenart have the ability to turn a beautiful young woman like Valeria, into an inanimate department store dummy.
Sunday, October 13th, 2013 on Seylla
Valeria is a fresh and delightful new addition to Met-Art. She is a 10, All Day, EVERY day.
You, however Leonardo are a disgrace to humanity!!! You showed total disrespect to your model Valeria here in this set. Out-of-focus crap that a five-year-old and a pin-hole camera could have improved on.
It's pretty bloody obvious that M-A couldn't give a shit, but your work is an absolute waste of my membership fees.
Twenty seven cents, $0.27c for a 7.62mm live round would be money well spent. You are an insulting dick-head.
Sunday, October 13th, 2013 on Presenting Valeria
Alyssa is a beautiful young woman, who was included in my top 100 models from the first time she posed. Schneider has done her no favors. I cannot relegate her just because one GWC doesn't understand the importance of the female anatomy, but this is a dead-pan set.
Thursday, October 10th, 2013 on Duab
Mr. Arkisi, your magic continues to astound me. Every time you introduce us to a new model, she just happens to be the personification of female perfection, just as Hilda is here.
Hilda, Thank You for sharing your stunning beauty with us in such glory and total abandon, especially in your first published session. You are a 10, Only because the ratings allow no more.
Arkisi, you deserve a 10 for your work, a 10 for the set, and a 10 for every image the set contains. The work from all concerned is faultless.
I sincerely hope you continue to work together regularly, with a movie or two thrown in. Please don't delay.
Thursday, October 3rd, 2013 on Hilda A
Paromov, take a study in the female anatomy. You'll find she has places that are truly astounding in how they react to being paid a little attention. You won't get idiots complaining about head-wear if you paid greater attention to her thigh area:-)
Sunday, September 29th, 2013 on Nensi B
Be grateful she hasn't been subjected to water-torture!! Neither has she been paired in a ridiculously innocuous g/g set.
Hey, guys, just be grateful she hasn't been subjected to insidious water torture. Murky bath/spa or bloody shower-head!! My only problem is in the lack of pussy. Surely she possesses that most exquisite source of ultimate pleasure. Paromov doesn't seem to know anything about it:-((
Sunday, September 29th, 2013 on Terminu
I like the play-acting. I love to see the models dressed, for a costume ball, Disco, lounge bar or bedroom. It's the end-result Paromov is missing out on. He gets the beginning right, but loses sight of the goal at the end.
He needs an education in the human female biological make-up. Probably too, that of the human male:-)
You can't compare the work done by Arkisi and Angelique to that submitted by Linin.
Saturday, September 28th, 2013 on Angelique A
You're talking about Angela Linin, obviously. She shoots her models with the animation of department store dummies.
I disagree. We have seen in this set, and the preceding 4 sets, ample proof of Alessandra's perfection in shape and form, so why limit your comments to this set only?
Now I don't know about you, but for myself, I spent 9 months in a nice warm and safe place being nurtured in a loving environment. By way of thanks, when I decided to make land-fall, I gave my mother hell, thankfully for just a short time, as I struggled to take my first breathe.
From a very young age I decided my life's ambition was to return to that Paradise on Earth as often as possible, and have found that feminine Wonderland the most beautiful, secure and rewarding place on earth.
Thanks to Matiss and his five sets with Alessandra, we are satisfied that Alessandra is one of God's Gifts. Now it is time for her to report, front-and-center, literally, to present that Ultimate of God's Gifts, in all her wonton, moist and glorious beauty, for us all to salivate over.
I don't know that Matiss is the photographer capable of doing the job. Tony Murano, Alex Sironi or Arkisi have the ability to present Alessandra at her most animated, feminine best.
Long may Alessandra A Reign:-)
Thank you both, for these 5 glorious sets.
Wednesday, September 25th, 2013 on Olleya
With any other photographer than Rylsky, I'm sure this girl would have rated higher than the 8 I gave her.
13 of the 17 sets are less than the "norm" for M-A of 120 images, and in 5 those 17 sets, the poor girl has been subjected to the "Insidious Rylsky Water Torture".
You have not done August Crystal justice Rylsky. And certainly no favours.
Monday, September 23rd, 2013 on Augusta Crystal
You got the bit about Nadine right. The rest is total B/S.
Sunday, September 22nd, 2013 on Lurra
Somebody said in an earlier post, this was Alessando's first shoot for M-A. I don't think this can be used as an excuse. Surely, if you're posting for the first time, you'd make sure the set was perfect.
Maybe he was trying something artistic, but the whole set is a washed-out mess. The only artistry connected to this set, is Nadine's own spectacular beauty and her knowledge of modelling and ability to pose seductively.
Everything you've said is true!! Well done glazar. I especially like your final comment. Tony is the best photographer to have graced Met-Art with his work.
This stunningly beautiful young woman's modelling career was terminated way too short. There are just 4 sets in a 12 month period, when lesser deserving models have sat for 6 - 9 sets.
For 12 months M-A hit the kill-button on erotic images appearing here. But they heard the riot approaching from their members, and erotica has made a very welcome return to the site.
I hope you will make the best of efforts to convince Tacia to return to your studio. You make all your models look and feel like princesses and Tacia is no exception.
Thursday, September 19th, 2013 on Tacia A
Sunday, September 15th, 2013 on Stales
The most sensible thing you wrote started with "However......but water just doesn't turn me on."
As much a great photographer he can be at times, he's basically a lazy, SOB!!
This is more than just a "regular" thing with Rylsky!! It's a bloody Obsession!! Every model he's ever used has had this "water torture" treatment, often more than once.
It's just a bloody lazy "out" for a snapper with no imagination. No need for make-up or hair stylist, because her hair is going to be wet and lank, sticking to her head and face in a lifeless paste.
It's pretty obvious he didn't want to do this shoot, and took the easy way out. Put a colored filter on his light, turned on the tap and pretended to be creative. B/S!!
The only thing that disappoints me on this set, has nothing to do with the images, model, set or photographer. It is the lack of her personal thoughts in her bio. We have a description of this delectable, desirable and delicious young lady.
By the way, Arkisi, I hate you. I love you like a brother, mate, because your work is nearly always perfection. But you have caused me to become insanely in love with this Stunning Goddess, who lives half a world away.
Thanks to you, Tristana has stolen my heart, and there's no possible way for me to steal hers. Totally unfair.
Saturday, September 14th, 2013 on Presenting Tristana
Don't fret-it mate. Any normal, red-blooded male would trip over his words when presented with the pure, unadulterated sexual beauty that Tristana most surely is.
Bloody Hell!! A "not just a leery-eyed snapper", but a genuine, real-life photographer with an education beyond the naked female form:-))
And I'm not being facetious. Your articulation and grammar strongly hint at either an Oxford or Cambridge education, possibly even that of a Rhodes Scholar.
If my Country is wrong, then my hemisphere is right, with Harvard a possibility, but that's primarily Law, if my 50+year-old education serves me right, and there are highly ranked universities in the US other than Harvard. But I noticed no "Americanisms" in your writing, so I'm sticking with England!!
The point of my writing though, has more to do with 'sandy genitalia'.
I got interested in females fairly young, and from about the age of 13, was experimenting with skinny-dipping and associated activities on school holidays at the beach. The discomfort experienced by both of us taught us to go shower first.
In those days, bach's (pronounced 'batches'), cribs/holiday homes were in remote seaside locations where toilets and showers were individual units, set aside from the main living area to eliminate sandy feet. Often, the kids had a bunkroom off-site to afford parents a little privacy for personal entertainment also. I won't expand on that.
My point is, I still harbor those memories at the beach, and to this day, I am frustrated in seeing sandy pussies. You are 100% right, take the location away, and you lose a certain exotic setting.
I will tell you something though. For the beach setting may be exotic, it will NEVER beat the pure, unadulterated erotic sexuality of an aroused, nubile young miss, wearing little more than lipstick, a smile and feminine lingerie, waiting, legs enticingly spread, on clean, crisp, white sheets.
From my hazy Greek learning days, Alpha was the 'Beginning' and Omega was the 'Ending'? Delta & Gamma are lost in that distant haze - my problem at school was my 'leery-eyed study of the naked female form' - so Deltagamma is even a bigger problem.
Perhaps, in the not-too-distant future, you might grace me with the formation of your chosen nom-deplume?
Thank you for so graciously participating in the accompanying discussions.
Friday, September 13th, 2013 on Rengini
The object is also a low-life, spineless coward, hiding as they are behind the favorable comments made by others. They haven't the guts they were born with to put a name in print.
A lot of good can be garnered from scum-bred individuals such as this.
The foremost is they are jealous of the model, be-it because of Edwidge's natural beauty, ability to pose, naked, with utter confidence and enthusiasm. Or they could also wanna-be a Beautiful, Naked, Model snapper, with no courage to face a woman and ask her to sit. That most likely stems from an aura exuded by pricks of their kind, who ooze slime, and even the most novice of models will pick up on this and turn them down flat.
Most likely, though, they're just perverts like those who get off on sniffing bicycle seats.
The best thing Edwidge, and her working crews can do is laugh in the face of this arsehole, male OR female and get on with what they enjoy doing.
And we can do much the same. But here's a thought - just occurred to me - perhaps we have a male/wanna be/female who's caught in a time-warp?? Now There's a laugh. Because pricks like this are NOT to be pitied. But scorned?? Absolutely!!
Credit where credit is due, Goncharov. Here at last you've created a set that is reminiscent of your previous (pre 2012 work). Your make-up artist has done remarkable job, keeping the line between scalp and forehead subdued, minimal and glamorous in its application.
The high-lights in Rachel's gorgeous eyes are sparkling, animated and totally professional.
The set is great, color definition superb, and the way you have captured Rachel, in every image, from her hair, eyes, mouth, breasts, butterfly, (so adorably discreet), to her feet, is the absolute height of professionalism. (# 87 is stunning in it's cropping:-)
Rachel, my thanks to you for approaching you work with the enthusiasm and dedication you do. By now you must know you are one of the favorites on M-A, but you have not allowed the fame and favor go to your head. Shows a maturity well beyond your years. (Some models, with less accolades, think their bodies are 22 carat gold, when they're definitely not!!)
Goncharov, thanks to you for your erotic and glamorous portrail of Rachel in this set. Rachel has been subtle, yet openly erotic and beautiful, while your work has been nothing but majestic in this presentation.
Friday, September 13th, 2013 on Cendina
HEY!! ALEX!!! Wake up mate!!! It's three long months since you last worked with Rinna!! An update id long over-due!!
Thursday, September 12th, 2013 on Rinna A
Liza B has the personality of an iceberg. She is so bland and unemotional in her sets from 2005, she makes a department store dummy positively animated. Worse, she makes an adult-store blow-up doll look stunningly voluptuous.
She has an over-rated sense of her own self importance. Just like Jackie D, the only other model on Met-Art I've dissed, in a collection of 500+ models.
The only thing she is thinking about is the money, money, money, at the end of the shoot. She's not here to entertain, just make money!! And the same goes for Leonardo!!
And I'm silly enough to pay the price!!!
Thursday, September 12th, 2013 on Tassa
You have to be kidding!!
Monday, September 9th, 2013 on Glacea
Bravo hipshot131!! Well stated!! I completely agree with everything you have written. The two who have voted against you can't think much of women, preferring them to be subjected pain and humiliation, rather than the huge respect they deserve for posing at all.
If that demented dick-head shoots her again, she can forget all about Top Model status. Goncharov has gone completely nuts over the last 21 months, and is getting worse. He is turning his models into inanimate department store dummy's. There wasn't even a decent headshot of Katie to swoon over!!
I personally applaud you guys, because not one of you raved on about how great the photography was. Honestly, a 5-year-old with a 1960's Kodak Instamatic could have done just as well.
Helen drives me crazy!! She is sensationally beautiful. Karl Sirmi also drives me crazy - but for a different reason. He want's to go back to school, study biology, with a Masters in the Female Anatomy. He apparently knows sweet F-A about female sexuality.
The most sexually attuned organ in a woman, is her brain. If you can't stimulate that, you will never succeed in stimulating her second most sexually attuned organ which is her genitals. (Men are different. A woman just has to look at a bloke, his dick stands up and his brain takes a holiday):-)
So, you dick-heads, looking at the images of Helen, how much do you now think Karl stimulated her brain? Helen didn't really want to be there. And that's a fact. Proof? Check out Rylsky's latest work here on Met-Art with Zelda B.
These girls are NOT department-store dummies. They're ALL human beings, presenting themselves to a possible 1.5 million viewers. Most sit for more than one or two series, because they enjoy the thought of seducing that number of viewers.
Helen here, is not among those girls.
Friday, September 6th, 2013 on Vipula
I am your only (current) detractor. While I agree with pretty much everything you've said about HELEN, her lingerie et al, she just needs a photographer with a little knowledge of the female anatomy.
You say, Rylsky, that "The best is yet to come...." I take that to mean the "best" is going to be eye-poppingly, hair-raisingly off the Planet?:-) Might I also expect some cream to float in my After Dinner Grand Marnier or Breakfast coffee??
Zelda is truly stunning, and you have done some incredible work with her. I wish you both, a long and happy association.
Friday, September 6th, 2013 on Dontosia
Welcome to Met-Art Malinka. Your debut shoot with Matiss really is a stunning presentation.
I hope there will be many more sets from you, and movies too:-)
Thursday, September 5th, 2013 on Malinka A
Welcome to Met-Art Linden, and Thank you for such an outstanding, uninhibited debut. Your beauty is flawless. Beautiful eyes, beguiling smile, your breasts are perfection in shape and form, great hips and shapely legs. Your pussy is eloquent in its expression, soft and a true delight to observe - proving God is a bloke and he has created the sweetest plaything designed for man.
I have rated you a 10, only because I couldn't rate you higher:-)
10 also to Mr Arkisi for his creativity and flawless photography. I hope you both continue in the same vein you've started in.
One last thing, I've been known to enjoy a decent dollop of cream in my morning, or late night coffee. At any time really:-) Cream is also exquisite floating on my after-dinner Grand Marnier;-)
Sunday, September 1st, 2013 on Presenting Linden
FYI, Flora, because you (and Rylsky) are not keeping yourselves up to date with the Photo & Video Content Guidelines!!!!!!
10th on the list - NO more bathroom or shower scenes. Be creative. Met-Art have underlined the "NO more bathroom or shower scenes". It seems they are as pissed off with the water torture models are subjected to as I am!!
Anita is a beautiful young woman with a flawless skin. Why distort this fabulous creation of feminine beauty in murky water?!!!
Sunday, September 1st, 2013 on Segye
What a total waste of time, effort, two beautiful young women, and bandwidth!! Your parents should take away your toys, Gonch, until you learn to use them constructively, artistically and productively.
Monday, August 26th, 2013 on Pyyar
You didn't shoot her debut. Problem solved.
If you have more work in the pipeline with Sunshine, I'll become an addicted and avid fan.
Her debut left me feeling pretty flat, to be honest. Someone made the comment that she'd be even more beautiful if she smiled more. I don't think she was in the mood to smile. She didn't enjoy that shoot as much as she did this one.
Thank you Deltagamma for exposing her delicious beauty, and Thank you Sunshine, for sharing.
Monday, August 5th, 2013 on Meyve
NOT my kind of photographer!!
Monday, August 5th, 2013 on Presenting Isabella
Alex Sironi, Alex S, Alex, A.S, "Please" make the next set of this Damsel, yours. Please.
Rylsky can't figure his arse from his elbow, so please, I hope your submission to this site, yours.
We need ART here, not Egotistical B/S!!
Monday, August 5th, 2013 on Kristel A
Dear Mr. Murano,
There is much that I admire about your work here on Met-Art. Not the least, being the number of images per set.
What I like most, about your work, is the way you convert a Pretty Girl, into a full-blown Princess.
Your artistry in this area has not been emulated, copied or even strived for by any other photographer here.
The bottom line to that last statement, the "point-and-shooters" who inundate this site should treat their models less as "department-store" dummy's, and more as human beings.
That said, the 50-odd dead-heads that control Met-Art, should get "Hands off Cocks, Feet in Socks...." (an old Army saying).
About Lucy F.... Not a drop-dead-gorgeous model, beautiful, spunky and pretty open. A Typical "Murano Princess." Why then, is she now, "dead-in-the-water"??
Monday, August 5th, 2013 on Lucy F
Sorry, if Antonio can't get her out of her shell, few would be able. She's a tight little clam, and that's all she wrote. I'm just sorry about the time I spent down-loading.
There are many more on this site, more worthy.
Monday, August 5th, 2013 on Brigitte B
Sorry Estelle, couldn't do anything with either of these sets.
Find yourself a photographer who knows their business. This guy is just a point-and-shoot snapper.
Monday, August 5th, 2013 on Estelle K
What ever it is you're on M Sebastion, it's too strong. You've over-dosed twice. No wonder she never came back!!
Monday, August 5th, 2013 on Amateurs
Dead-set, a dark, dumb, pointless set of grotty images.
The only thing you've succeeded in doing is insulting your model.
Belongs in the dungeon, from whence it came.
Monday, August 5th, 2013 on Presenting Estelle
Nothing from Malina for 8 months??? That's an oversight bordering on the criminal, Mr. Iskan.
Please rectify this matter, soonest please!
Sunday, August 4th, 2013 on Malina A
IMHO, the best of the 10 sets you have produced of Malina. I'm not counting the previous disaster called "Urge."
The video version of this set "Borderline" would be fantastic!! If no video is available, "Borderline Pt 2" would be excellent.
Malina is incredibly sexy and wanton in this set, (as she is in others), but to my mind, this is the stand-out set.
Thank you both for great photography, great poses, and for delivering Malina's sensual beauty.
More in 2013 please.
Sunday, August 4th, 2013 on Borderline
In my opinion, Catherine is the most over-rated photographer on M-A. I only down-load her sets if she's shooting a model I am already collecting, but she invariably leaves me frustrated and fuming.
I have not checked out Gabriel A's sets for this reason. However, I am prepared to eat my words if Gabriel proves me wrong. I'll go immediately and check her out.
If what you say is true, I MAY become a convert:-)
Saturday, August 3rd, 2013 on Matawa
I agree with every word you've written. Sadly, we are not seeing as much of Tony as we used to!!:-((
Tony always treats his models like a Princess, and accordingly, they go to great lengths to please.
I am far away from being a tat fan, but as long as they're unobtrusive, I will put up with them. Like body piercings, I hate lip and nose studs, but earrings and navel adornments can look quite attractive.
Malena, for all her unqualified beauty, hasn't cracked my Top 100 yet, and I blame Luca entirely for this almost criminal failure.
Hammerime put it perfectly, because this set put me to sleep. Not the least reason being the fact there are only 101 images!! Luca has Deliberately left out the Erotic & Glamor intentions of this site, to produced nothing but artsy-fartsy, sleep-inducing, boring studies of a sunset!! The model, Malena is the inconsequential prop here, not the focus of attention.
Saturday, August 3rd, 2013 on Nasmenil
Marica has a Triple A+ rating all day, every day. Totally unadulterated perfection in every respect.
This constitutes a great set IMHO. Great poses, perfectly framed and captured:-)
THANK YOU, Marica and Arkisi. (Sorry, I was shouting for the world to hear:-)
Monday, July 29th, 2013 on Essere
Handy to know:-) Thanks jamesEd
Monday, July 29th, 2013 on Galina A
As Ardelia's confidence increases, she able to relax more in front of the camera. Her eyes, Especially in the previous Synepia set, could have ignited a fire of wet timber, in pouring rain:)
In this set though, it was her provocative and alluring pussy that lit my fire.
If Ariel Piper can work continuously from 2005 thru' 2013, Ardelia can work continuously until she's 30 and beyond - IMHO. And I hope she does.
Thank you Ardelia and Arkisi, for yet another perfectly exquisite set of erotic glamour.
Sunday, July 28th, 2013 on Biala
Why leave the Planet, Rylsky? Try Outback Australia, SW Queensland in particular. Plenty of Lunar-scapes around, if you can stand the 45°C heat (110°F) - not cold around here:)
Saturday, July 27th, 2013 on Presenting Malta
You missed Leonardo. He's another who uses these methods with insane regularity. I confess, however, you progressed a lot further than I did. I saw the "water torture" and the flat, one-dimensional images and left the rubbish alone. (I STILL haven't seen a tattoo yet).
If more people took notice of the crap that is currently being posted here by absolute dick-heads, Goncharov, Leonardo, Slastyonoff et al, might get humiliated enough to actually get their brain into gear before clicking the shutter. Someone did recently write on this site that he was not renewing his sub for this very reason!
All these guys here are saying how great Mia is, and that's fine, but all that has happened, Slastyonoff has humiliated her, by the mere fact he has published a less than mediocre set of images.
Friday, July 26th, 2013 on Ponekad
I can only afford a two-day trial. What is that going to cost me?
Thursday, July 25th, 2013 on Gamle
Your first comment is beautifully written Neil. Call me biased, but they are my sentiments also:-)
I never saw the clock - could it be your are actually Older than me?? - but we are in a similar boat my friend!!
In Met-Art's own Photo Guidelines there is a sentence which they themselves have underlined, which states -
"NO more bathroom or shower scenes". That sentence is one of the few they've underlined. They finish by saying "Be Creative."
I for one, am delighted that the "Water Torture" too many models are subjected to, is to end.
Can we hope that steamed-up and water-stained shower doors and mirrors, both of which distort and distract from the model's natural beauty, are included in this tenet?
Wednesday, July 24th, 2013 on Rosadina
And from yet another old duffer, the most important factor on this site, is "maintaining the young woman's self esteem." Thanks for the use of your words Neil. She is, after all, putting herself "out there" for us to appreciate, and not be critical of.
I'm with you on that;-)
Wednesday, July 24th, 2013 on Quartiere
Having got that idiot out of my system, let me say Thank you Alex, for presenting Malinda to us, in all her flawed (to a few only), beauty.
I hope you and Malinda collaborate often, with August 2013 being an ideal month for you to continue your journey together. ;-)
Wednesday, July 24th, 2013 on Presenting Malinda
Yeah. And you beat the crap out of your wife/girlfriend too, when they're not looking. You wouldn't have the balls to face them and swing a punch, they'd probably knock you vacant skull off your shoulders:-)
Consider this girl for a Minute, arsehole!! She's 18, her first shoot, first time naked in front of a camera, to a viewing population that runs at about 1,500,000 members and you criticize her Nails??
Because you have missed the obvious, Malinda has blonde hair, green eyes, a voluptuous 37" bust, which she carries proudly, great legs, and she has placed her pussy on display, more than once.
Take a look at that, you drop-kick, and let's see you criticize THAT!!
Thanks rainnwynd, well said:-) Personally, I find it impossible to criticize a model for having a few flaws. The shooter's stuff-ups, that's another matter. But the model is presenting herself in all her naked glory. Who are we to criticize??
LMFAO!!:-) There are a LOT of sweet chicks there, Malinda is keeping good company.
Yeah, well, shit does happen..... Proof positive that Malinda and Alex are both human:-)
Tuesday, July 23rd, 2013 on Presenting Malinda
Thank you rufusredneck - you've saved me a lot of time:-)
I could not agree with you more. Every comment you've made, tintin, is spot on. Leonardo & Goncharov are just two who dropped the ball in 2012 and have been scoring "own goals" for the past 12 months. Rylsky dropped the ball too, but he's picked it up and is presenting much better sets in the last couple of months.
What IS this crap about? One set and 'That's all, she wrote??'
Newsflash Peter, the Fat-Lady hasn't sung yet. She's not even in the Country!!
Tuesday, July 23rd, 2013 on Roksan A
Get a life, fuckwit.
Tuesday, July 23rd, 2013 on Roshelle A
Because he/she is a brain-dead idiot. A brain-dead idiot without manners.
Delfina is truly beautiful and exciting. Vladimiroff has done pretty well in these first two sets.
Tuesday, July 23rd, 2013 on Delfina A
I am firmly convinced, Leonardo, that you think that your big camera gives you a big dick. Your big camera, Leonardo, has MADE a Big Dick out of you. Revert to your pre-2012 style of art, because you current work is just making a dick-head out of you.
Tuesday, July 23rd, 2013 on Milana K
I apologise unconditionally for the double post:-((
Tuesday, July 23rd, 2013 on Milia
Baggy36Pants was fortunate in finishing his day with Zlatka starring so seductively in her "Milia" set. My day unfortunately Started with her, I say unfortunately, because it's doubtful that anything that comes after, is going to compare with this set.
The Set, 10 - Cloud 10 - Zlatka blows the barometer apart!! (She sure red-lined My rev-counter:-)
This set portrays Zlatka at her sexy, provocative, feminine best - on apples no less!! I wonder what Cloud and she could create in the boudoir, starting in sexy bra & panties?? The results would be mind-blowing......
Better the apples than the hard, unforgiving hay bales she was "Presented" on:-)
I think having Zlatka posing on apples was an inspired idea, considering she is the most Angelic and Cherubic of Temptresses;-)
The only thing that is not Perfect here, has nothing to do with the lady in question. Slowness of her sets appearing is irritating, annoying and depressing.
I only found Nichole on May 17th, downloaded all her sets and opened a bottle of Moet in celebration and to toast my discovery and her beauty.
It's a Bloody Long Time Between Drinks, Mr. Arkisi!!:-(( A man could die of thirst, if not a broken heart.
Monday, July 22nd, 2013 on Nichole A
Personal request to Mr. Alex Iskan - Sir, it's a long time between drinks with a mere 3 sets in almost nine months.
Please collaborate with Shaina to produce more of her beauty and bubbly personality.
Sunday, July 21st, 2013 on Shaina A
This beautiful lady needs more exposure:-)
Sunday, July 21st, 2013 on Yuta A
It is my good fortune that I finally found you Zhanet. Thank you for sharing your beautiful features with us. I especially like your hair, shoulders, eyes, nose, mouth, breasts, delicious pussy and lovely legs;-)
Thank you Alex Sironi for presenting this vision of beauty to us.
Sunday, July 21st, 2013 on Zhanet A
Therein lies the trap, my friend - Spend More Money!!
Met-Art, with their 50 chiefs, there are no Indians here, need $'s to maintain the lifestyle they've become accustomed to. Hence they're now offer 1 dozen sites free!!:-) The short straw spells it out, those Free Sites are on a two day trial only.
Met-Art is of the impression that because they are now all millionaires and living nicely 'thank you' out of OUR wallets, we must be also. They are forgetting that Real people have budgets to which they must adhere, and are in no position to squander money on 12 sites at $100 a year each.
Sunday, July 21st, 2013 on Vapno
Nice timing my friend:-) I'm glad to see her back too.
Sunday, July 21st, 2013 on Mira D
So we are agreed that the adorably deliciously delectable stunningly Beautiful Flavia is a keeper, right?? She heads My Top 10 hands down.
But how about a High Five for the two guys who have delivered Flavia's sensational beauty.
Hat's off to both Rylsky and Leonardo for their untiring attention not only to Flavia's obvious beauty, but to her fun side, and to her undeniable sensuousness & sexuality also.
Long may her teasing and sexy demeanor reign!!:-)
Incidentally, Leonardo your vid is a 10. Rylsky, 8½ only. Sorry.
Sunday, July 21st, 2013 on Flavia A
Beautiful model with a great photographer = Perfection!! Great work, Oliwia & Alex:-)
Saturday, July 20th, 2013 on Vexo
Milena is is one of my favorite models, and hope she continues her association - but for God's sake I hope she changes her her shooter to a photographer who will do her justice.
Nothing blackens my day more or quicker than blurry, out-of-focus B/S that destroys her true beauty. And that is all Latika has succeeded in doing.
Adomavoi81 is right. Latika is one of a few shooters who can turn Gold to shit, and he's done it deliberately.
Saturday, July 20th, 2013 on Vrahioli
HEAR FUCKING HEAR!!!!! This set is atrocious for the out-of-focus CRAP he has submitted!! A truly beautiful model spat on by her shooter.
1,376 voters on this site with just an average point score of 8.51. Then I come along, casting vote #1,377 and her over-all score drops to 8.5.
There can be only two reasons for her score being so low. Few if any gave her 10's, and those who did have been over-ridden by viewers who have looked past the Big Name shooters and analyzed their work.
1. This is the way Nataly wanted to be portrayed. I find this difficult to believe, because she was open to pretty much any posing suggestion, her pussy got active, but never finished the course - no fault of hers, I think. Nataly hasn't got a loose bit of skin on her entire 5' 5" frame. Her 37 inch bust is proudly firm and dominant. Beautiful hair, flawless skin with interesting, beautiful, expressive eyes.
2. Because the photography was abysmally second-rate, at best. You two snappers just went through the motions purely for the pay-check. How in hell you could hold your heads up for your outrageous payments has me beat!!
I have to add, Leonardo, I'm really impressed with this new unit of yours. You know, REALLY IMPRESSED, (not!!) The big difference between your camera and my 7D, I know how and where to center the focus!! That's something you need to re-learn!! Better still, go back to the older equipment, you knew how that worked.
Friday, July 19th, 2013 on Nataly F
I wouldn't say Nastya is getting better with age, but the quality of image and style has certainly improved
Her age is a bit of a conundrum:-) Was she 26 when first photographed?? That would make her about 34 now.
It's a moot point though, 'cause at 26 or 34, she is a stunning young woman.
And what a delightful video she starred in for Luca:-))
Thursday, July 18th, 2013 on Nastya C
I wonder who the 2nd photog is I was thinking of??? Knuckle-head:-) Sorry, Koenart.
That's a delightful little vid there too. Karina is worth another one or two:-)
Thursday, July 18th, 2013 on Karina O
I aplogize for posting this twice. Unintended.
Thursday, July 18th, 2013 on Nikia A
Congratulations Rylsky, on you video work with the incomparable Nikia.
She is just about the most amazingly stunningly beautiful model on the planet, though it is more of a hobby for her.
Your videos of this earth-bound Angel, while not terribly erotic are glamor-plus!!
In "Latria", I don't know if your were thinking of Goldilocks, but it's what I first and still think of. Instead of porridge, she tries clothes, then leaves a mess behind for the home owners to clean up, as she calmly walks away. Loved it.
In "Sonorilo", the emphasis was on her breasts - a very worthy focal point. I thought the flower tracing over her body was a little long, but who could deny the flawless portrayal of her breasts.
Exceptional work from both (all) of you. The crew did a great job on the lighting. It was fabulous in both vids.
It's not for any Presidency, it's cash for his bloody retirement fund!! It IS a conspiracy, all these extra affiliated sites to rake more money from the unaware.
When I joined up in 2010, there were Met-Art and Errotica Archives. During 2012, Rylsky got his banner and a Dozen other sites and affiliates were introduced.
Retired, I can only afford a monthly sub of $40 to M-A and $10 to E-A. That's $50pm. $600pa. Next year I'll be better off and will pay an annual fee of $100, but I'd never be dumb enough to include another 5 sites at the same price!!
This is pure greed on M-A's part, and we're the dumb-arses filling their coffers.
Wednesday, July 17th, 2013 on Presenting Yvonne
Not Everyone - but it wasn't rocket-science:-))
I have downloaded Yarina's sets, and delightful video, not because of Goncharov's mediocre work, but in spite of it.
A rank amateur could work with Yarina and she would look great. Yarina's flawless beauty did just that here.
Goncharov has been working like a tired, worn-out old hack for 18 months.
Wednesday, July 17th, 2013 on Yarina A
So very true!! I wonder if the knuckle-dragger ha heard of the Mona Lisa. HER eyes are on the observer from ANY direction, and that is just the most obvious example.
Tuesday, July 16th, 2013 on Limeri
Got the nail right on the head, about the head :-) (no pun intended).
I agree whole-heartedly with your comments about Yani. She was destined for my top 10 from Rylsky's first set with her, even though he subjected her to the 'Water-Torture' he's so insanely obsessive about. His 2nd and 3rd sets set the tone that Alex Iskan eventually elaborated on.
But poor old Leo wasn't up to the task, in fact his work has deteriorated so much over the last 18 months, I don't think it's the same Leonardo who was such a master of his craft prior to 2012.
Tuesday, July 16th, 2013 on Vacatio
He should at least hand his camera to someone who'll make proper use of it. Leonardo is a freaking Dick-Head, thinking he can pass this 2nd-rate crap off as photography. If only his brain was as intelligent as his camera!!
Tuesday, July 16th, 2013 on Presenting Arina
Zsanett and Arkisi are an incredible combination, both being true artists at the top of their game.
Zsanett with her flawless skin and expressive posing and Arkisi with his forthright, honest photography.
10's to you both.
Monday, July 15th, 2013 on Sininen
This 'cute-as-a-button' little pocket-rocket is as sweet and as sexy as it gets.
3 sets in three months is well deserved and well earned attention.
Can't wait to see her again in August:-)
Saturday, July 13th, 2013 on Aneta
You're right about one thing, no one can shoot 'his' girls like he can.....many do a lot better - Tony Murano for one. Goncharov is good, there's no argument there, but Tony is the best, most consistently brilliant photographer on the site. I think their rankings say it best.
Thursday, July 11th, 2013 on Natalie B
At just 19-years-of-age, Natalie has a sophistication that belies her years. Yet she remains just the "Girl Next Door" in her attitude and personality. There is not one hint of a 'diva-syndrome' as she poses with such a simple ease.
Natalie oozes a sultry sexuality that is palpable. She would be a fun lady on a date, and you'd have to be pretty 'weird', not to be honored to have her at your side. I know I would:-)
Thank you Goncharov for introducing Natalie to us, and Arkisi for continuing with her. However, you both need a kicking, for missing out on an April set.
I hope Natalie is with us every month for the next dozen years.
WHEW!! There are many truly beautiful young women on Met-Art, and this stunning young lady is right up there with the best. Another gorgeous Latvian beauty.
Welcome to M-A Patricity, I hope you enjoy your notoriety:-) You are deliciously beautiful, and will gather a huge following of fans.
My only wish is that when you next work, your photographer isn't as stingy as Koenart was with this set, a mere 120 images when 200 would nearly have been enough.
Do you shutter-bugs quit at 120 simply because you've run out of ideas????
Thursday, July 11th, 2013 on Patritcy A
Great response friend. On the Button:-)
Thursday, July 11th, 2013 on Mesimero
I thank you for your observations about starting about starting a model fully nude - and Especially a first-timer. I made a similar observation about 1000 down-loads ago.
Those above us complaining about her lack of smile/facial expression have missed that point entirely. I don't give a rat's-arse, but even the most experienced Erotic models don't produce their best work when they're totally naked from the first shot. Even Their work is better if they're wearing something more than a smile at the start.
Making a new model start nude, especially with a relatively inexperienced photographer, is just about suicidal. The lass shows her reluctance in her demeanor.
On top of that, Bob Gioccione (?) over-did the "soft-focus/romantic" crap in his Penthouse magazine in the 70's. Those of us who are old enough to remember those centerfolds are well-and-truly over it.
Thursday, July 11th, 2013 on Presenting Agata
Erotic glamour at its sublime best:-) Beautiful woman, rich colors combined with intelligent and imaginative photography. Mr. Rylsky, you have surpassed much of your recent work. Brilliantly! (IMHO):-)
Thursday, July 11th, 2013 on Deria
I agree with the sentiments expressed by both of the above. Anita is a deliciously beautiful young woman, with just about the most desirable and sought-after pussy on the internet. For her dedication expressed in this set, she earns a 10 out of a possible 10.
Luca, unfortunately earns 1. The only thing more depressing than a drowned cat to look is a washed-out pussy. Plainly speaking, in Erotic Glamour photography, WATER is an abused substance. I cannot state accurately, how many fans have rated Anita, but I would suggest less than 1% of them would get any satisfaction from ANY sets involving water.
So let's get Anita back into some high-class lingerie, and even higher heels:-))
Thursday, July 11th, 2013 on Schimba
The pin was pulled years to soon on this model of feminine perfection. A law should be introduced, that every model portrayed on Met-art, should have updates and in this case, every 30 days would be fine by me.
Tuesday, July 9th, 2013 on Ira E
210 images, and beautifully produced, of this 5' 3" pocket-rocket!! You sure can pick 'em Mr. Nikonoff!! Problem!! There's not enough of this damsel.
Going by her bio, Ira would now be 36, and just be hitting her straps. Only now, would she be attaining her gorgeous perfection. This little dynamo will be photogenic at 60 and beyond. How's about an update?????:-)
Tuesday, July 9th, 2013 on Ira Live On Met
Samantha is perfection on two legs. Perfect figure and flawless skin.
Beautiful hair, seductive eyes, cute nose, delectable lips, perfect breasts, gorgeous waist and hips, with shapely legs, and I'd crawl across Europe just for a taste her pussy.
Your work with Samantha has been stunning, with very generous sets - 1525 images in 8 sets at an average of 190.6 per.
I have a few regrets though. It has taken me 7 years to find this adorable young woman, she hasn't had work submitted in 2 years, 3 months and 8 days, and her butterfly didn't fly as majestically as it could have.
Perhaps I am expecting a miracle, but bigger ones have happened, even here on Met-Art. How about an update from the seductive, sultry and Sexy Miss Samantha B?
You would have my eternal gratitude. Cheers:-)
Monday, July 8th, 2013 on Samantha B
Her Feet?? I don't even know if she's got carpet-burns on her knees from all the time she spends on all fours with her pert bum in the air!!:-) Edwidge has too many other, glaringly obvious attributes for me to be worried about her feet:-)
Monday, July 8th, 2013 on Boliazo
A word to you photogs here at Met-Art. While you guys are so intent on what Mrs. Palmer and her five daughters are doing to you while you sit on your unproductive back-sides, Errotica Archives have stolen a march on you by producing two new sets in 2013, of this vision of unadulterated feminine beauty - over there. So when are you going to wake up and at LEAST catch up, if not Surge ahead. Chop, Chop guys, there's work to be done!!
While I appreciate the work done with Alisa by Leonardo, Alex Iskan, Max Asolo and Erik Latika, I think this Princess needs Tony Murano to create the 'Earth-bound' Angel that Alisa really is.
Monday, July 8th, 2013 on Alisa G
You have done it again, Mr. Arkisi, with the delightfully delectable and DELICIOUS Miss Katie A!!:-)
Thank You both, for continuing your arousingly stunning work.
Sunday, July 7th, 2013 on Dettaglio
The stunningly beautiful Niki Mey is so sensual, sultry and sexy, she'd put a hard on the statue of Adonis:-) Thanks Flora, for bringing her back. And Thanks, Niki, for being you.
Sunday, July 7th, 2013 on Niki Mey
You might well have found your Soul-Mate, Domenic, in the very talented and versatile Dominica.
Young, free-spirited and uninhibited, Dominica should be featured more often. There is a great rapport between you that should not be ignored.
Stunning work from both of you. Thanks:-)
Friday, July 5th, 2013 on Domenica A
I think Candy would be better suited with another photographer. I don't think Matiss knows what you're referring too, much less where to find it:-)
Friday, July 5th, 2013 on Candy A
Few women are as comfortable as Janette is in her own skin. Janette shows she is confident and secure in front of the camera.
Stunningly attractive both in her still work and spectacular in her video, it's time we had her back. I would love to see more of her either shooting sets of videos. Both options would be even better:-)
Thank you Janette and Luca for your beautiful work.
Thursday, July 4th, 2013 on Janette A
The only thing wrong with these sets, is purely the responsibility of the shooter. And that's all Koenart did here in Christel's 3 sets. Just clicked the shutter, with an absolutely blank mind and totally blind to the images.
In nearly all her images, her head is tilted (often drastically), to the left, and turned left, with her hair pushed back over her right shoulder. This has left the right side of her face looking flat and shapeless.
With her hair being so straight, her hair should be evenly spread, with her head erect, no matter which way she is looking. Tilting her head way beyond the line of her shoulders is B/S as well!!
At just 5' 4" her figure ain't at all bad.
So, Mr/Ms/Mrs/Miss Koenart - Closer Attention to Detail if you please!! This girl is a Stunner - in the proper circumstances.
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013 on Christel A
How much sweeter though, if we could have focused the bloody camera!!
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013 on Presenting Tofana
There is a lot to be said that's all good about Brooklyn, (I don't give a damn about her dirty feet, she's out-doors for Chris-sake!!), but less about Dave. He is capable of, and has proved, he can do better than this. I await her 2nd set, looking for the improvements Dave knows he has to make.
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013 on Presenting Brooklyn
Just where do they get the thatching for roofing in "Outback" Australia? I live in Charleville, SW Queensland, and the only roofing I've seen when roaming the stations of this massive State (3x times the size of Texas;-) is corrugated iron, or, if you're Really Lucky, made from flattened 20 gallon tins. Earlier than that? Wooden slats.
Cause for a celebration:-) Another set from the Delicious Loretta!! Only have to wait for 8 more hours before popping the champagne. Thank you Mr. Arkisi, and thank YOU, Loretta. You are #1 in my Top 10.
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013 on Loretta A
I just don't get you Rylsky. You have gone from being a photographer of some note, who knew something about color, skin tones and image composition, (but that was pre 2012), to a shooter of dull, flat, muddy skin toned, and lifeless images.
It seems to me you have lost the enthusiasm you once had for your work.
I think this set is terrible and did the adorable Caesaria no justice at all.
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013 on Pacelas
Actually, there are a lot more than you think, who despise the 'wet look'!!
A very sensual, beautiful young lady Koenart. Shouldn't we be due for an update? Please.
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013 on Bella C
Gil123, go see an optometrist!! You need glasses. While you're out, go get some tutoring. Your vocabulary is abysmal - meaning its shit.
Monday, July 1st, 2013 on Sapphira A
How could you miss with this girl? How could you get a dud set, even a dud image?? You couldn't and shouldn't. Luca hasn't!!!! Every set has been amazing!! Sapphira was in my Top 100 on March 25, 2013!!!!
A stunning beauty, adorable, beautiful and a credit to her sex.
Now that B/S that has prevailed in M-A over the past 17 months has been lifted, (it seems from 07012013:-) perhaps her perfect butterfly might emerge from its seductive cocoon, spread its glorious wings, and offer us more of her inner beauty.
Thank you Leonardo, for delivering this stunning set. Colors, poses, outfit, back-ground, all combine to make this a fabulous set, of the already well-documented beauty of Mila.
Image size has been tops for a while, but your work in close-ups in this set is outstanding.
Monday, July 1st, 2013 on Voajer
Well, well, well. Mr. Rylsky I have to take my hat off to you.
I don't recall ever having been called a single-minded hypocrite, because I give credit where credit is due.
With out a doubt, this is the most vibrant, entertaining,intimate and exciting work you have posted in 17 months, (IMHO) and Sir, I thank you for it.
Colors are great, Irina is distinguishable from her back-ground and looking beautiful as always, and the photography is honest.
Love the model, and this set. Brilliant. 10/10:-)
Monday, July 1st, 2013 on Saudade
So, Rylsky, you do exist? Not just an automated robot?
I take my photography Very Seriously, but unlike you, I have just one site on which to place my images. It's a business site, on which I cannot afford to place crap.
You, however, since your affiliation to M-A have the benefit of two sites. RylskyArt, where I BET you wouldn't dare place dud images, and here, at M-A, where it doesn't matter, because we're paying for the site en masse, take-what-comes.
You were ONCE, my most sought-after photographer. (Along with Tony Murano), where you photographed your models as real, live, animated, expressive human beings.
Your work Here, at M-A has become robotic, inanimate and dull. IMHO, you no longer deserve your what #10 rating at M-A. Again, IMHO, you don't make the top 100.
Tony, Antonio, Sergey, Alex, Balius, Alex, Domingo, and many others, produce sets whose images leap out of the screen at you. You no longer do that.
I'll be looking forward to you response. Surely there is a reason for the drop in standard (IMHO) of your work?
Sunday, June 30th, 2013 on Grandio
Feeona here, is not the problem. It's her bloody artist(?!!!) Rylsky's work with Feeona has been going backwards since the first time they worked together. I could list 20 photographers - not shooters - who would bring out the ultimate best in Feeona, without having t think about it!!
Absolute crap!! Rockhard, IMHO. This set is total bullshit. Rylsky, in my opinion, just doesn't get it. For me, there are just TWO, (2) images I like in this set, but even then, I can't keep them in Toto. 86 I'd keep for the set of her lips and 114, just for the look in her eyes.
For Rylsky, M-A has become the dumping ground for his crap. It's as obvious as dog's-balls TO ME that since Rylsky became affiliated to M-A in early 2012, his submissions here have become crap.
His sets have become flat, one-dimensional, toneless crap. Feeona's make-up is all wrong, too pale for the background. Her eyes and lips undefined in almost completely white images. Rylsky goes for either shades of black or shades of white. Then he sets his camera up, sets it for an image every five minutes, then leaves. Judging by the results of his work in the past 15 months, I think HE must play with himself during the period of he shoot. Because that is what I think his work has become. Just a bloody jack-off!!
The only similarity I picked up between the two, is the bow tie on both covers. In Farfallino, she's wearing stockings and no bow tie. In Noir, she has a bow tie, but no stockings. But it is difficult to discern if the garment round her hips in Noir, is the same one from Farfallino.
Friday, June 28th, 2013 on Katy D
I think Katy and Sergey have a great understanding and worked very well together. I give the both 10's.
Roll out the next set, you two:-) You're not done yet.
OMG!! Watching you lick your upper arm....possibly the most sensuous image in M-A. Your tongue could invade my tonsils and beyond any day and all day. Even after licking your arm:-)
Someone mentioned earlier your finger-licking gorgeousness:-) I had to agree with him. Your technique would drive a man absolutely NUTS.
I'd love to be a client of yours, but there wouldn't be too much discussion. 60 seconds in your company and any problems I had would fly out the window;-)
Marica, you and Arkisi make a great team! Your work with him is sensual, sexy and stunning. Soon, I hope you're flying for us, just like a beautiful butterfly.
Friday, June 28th, 2013 on Sabores
I agree with your sentiments - Latika has shot good work, but this is far from his best. Can't imagine where his mind was here, but it wasn't on the set.
Thursday, June 27th, 2013 on Presenting Polina
I've never seen a 'Portrait' specific monitor. Square and landscape, but not portrait.
So you are 100% right about shooting formats.
I don't have a problem with black edges though. Irfanview 3.97 produces huge images which require using the sliders. It also gives you a lot more viewing options than the Windows viewer, if that's what you're using.
Thursday, June 27th, 2013 on Pammie Lee
After 9 superb sets of Rachel from Tony Murano, is a nothing set by comparison. Look and learn, Ratmir.
Thursday, June 27th, 2013 on Neve
Wednesday, June 26th, 2013 on Neve
Too much of the incredibly Beautify ANITA E would never be enough. I could stare into her dream-inducing green eyes forever, attach myself limpet-like to her sensuous mouth for months on end. Playing tag between her breasts/nipples and her tasty pussy would be my full-time occupation.
Please keep Anita busy:-)
Wednesday, June 26th, 2013 on Milda
I agree with half of what you say. More bedroom/lingerie shots. Swimsuits and bikinis don't move me, and wet and distorted pussies are the biggest turn-off of all time.
Sexy, sheer or lacy lingerie is my choice of preference.
More subtlety is definitely required. Most of Violla's sets start out nude. And I guess that's the choice of most guys, but Violla, along with most women, open up more readily, and with greater enthusiasm, if they start the shoot with a little mystique.
Ever met a woman at the door to take her out on a date, who is completely nude? Same with shooting. It's nice to enter the bedroom to find her naked, but I prefer to take her clothes off myself, personally, and take my own goddam good time in doing so.
Wednesday, June 26th, 2013 on Violla A
We don't get too many who are willing to open up as willingly as Violla does. There aren't too many photographers (Rylsky & Erro are two) who can't be bothered with adding color to their work the way Matiss does.
I give them both 10/10. Violla because she's stunningly beautiful, is 'just my size' and is truly Sex on Legs. She turns parts of me to quivering jelly, but others into rods of steel.
Matiss gets 10's also, because he is thoughtful, has a great imagination (though the water-melon was a bit over-done here), loves color and has a great rapport with his models. Violla in particular.
July can't come soon enough. Make the next set earlier rather than later in the month. (We might have time for two:-))
Wednesday, June 26th, 2013 on Karpuzi
Yeah, she could have been sucking the juices out of something harder than a soft, pink, water-melon. But believe me, things do improve. A lot!
Violla made my Top 100 from her first set. In no time at all, she made my Top 10 of Most Beautiful and Uninhibited models on this site.
A lot of recognition has to go to Matiss, too. After all, it's his unquestioned ability, and rapport with Violla that produces these stunning images.
Congratulations to both of you. And a big THANK YOU, for your time, hard work, great results, and for Sharing.
2,634 votes this girl has got!! Must be SOME fans out there?? Where has she gone?? I certainly hope she hasn't gone to Oblivion!! That's a cold and lonely place for a beauty like Sonia:-((
Tuesday, June 25th, 2013 on Sonia C
Congratulations on your recent purchase of an underwater camera Erik.
That said, this is the worst work you have presented here. Those last 30 images were inane at best. Shooting in tidal water? What were you thinking!! If you HAVE to waste band width with your model in water, use a swimming pool. Chlorine is still tough on a models' eyes, but no where near as harsh as salt water. (Her eyes must have looked like road maps of the Ukraine by days end).
You'll also get a greater accuracy in your images, than those wasted shots in moving water.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Emersione
Not a lot to be proud of, you M-A shooters:-(( Only 3 sets of Nataly here, all shot by Erro.
FYI - Nataly is still working - from 2008, but I had to get 14 sets and 4 videos from E-A.
What's wrong with you guys?? Blind??:-)
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Magnetic
Rylsky ain't the artist he was pre-banner. I think his #1 ranking here has gone to his head. He in not producing half the quality he was prior to 2012. He's lost all imagination!!
Look at this set again you guys!! What draws your attention to the images? Is it the pale skin on the models, the washed-out pastel shade of their lingerie, the pale background, or the dark timber in the walls????
The first thing I noticed was the timber. I had to LOOK for the models. Both are very attractive but in my opinion every image is bland, flat and life-less.
Rylsky needs a wake-up call!! I have lost all respect for him as a photographer. Go back 2 years mate, and compare what you're doing now, with what you did then!!
Sunday, June 23rd, 2013 on Babydolls
There is. Rylsky's imagination!!
Very enjoyable couple of hours down-loading Anita's sets. But 12 months have passed since her last shoot. We are LONG over-due for an update:-)
Sunday, June 23rd, 2013 on Anita C
One wonders what this exquisite beauty has done wrong to have been shelved so abruptly.
For 2 years we are lucky, and she's in camera range every couple of months, then poof!! Gone. It's been 7 lonely months since her last shoot. 7 months too long.
Please guys. Bring her back.
Saturday, June 22nd, 2013 on Anika A
You could add to that, a very sad, insecure individual, poorly educated, low self esteem, with no ambition and even less self-respect.
Saturday, June 22nd, 2013 on Popolare
latinlover. Check it. 3(?) items above??
Who was giving a shit? Who cared? Who DOES care she's not a natural blonde? And says Who? Jennifer is just Plain Fucking Gorgeous, whether blonde, brunette, red-head, brindle or bald!!
I don't know, nor much care, how long you have been subbing to M-A, but three of the shooters (including Rylsky), you have mentioned above, are pussy-whipped.
Erik Latika, you obviously haven't seen much of. He is generally a more professional artist than Rylsky, Goncharov and Leonardo combined.
Pity you hadn't viewed his earlier work, and based your assumption on his latest. That was far from his normal standard. I'm sure he had a brain-fart. Who doesn't??
Saturday, June 22nd, 2013 on Solaz
Tell you something Erik, I came back to professional photography after a break of a ¼ of a century. 25 years I was gone. Mamiya RB67 ProS, Mamiya 330C and Mamiya RZ's. That was the equipment I was using in 1985-90. Gotta remember the manfoto 5x7 monorail in there too:-)
My point? For 7 years, from age 60, I had been managing a 5* hotel, 14 hour days were the norm! I retired. Stuff it. Bought myself a whole lot of gear I knew nothing about, but hell, I had been a pro, at 40!!
I did not dis-similar to this set when I first stepped out as a freelance pro in Feb 2012.
Every-fucking-one-of-us who comments on this page has done the same thing. If they haven't, they've never held a camera in their lives!!
There will be those who know absolute shit about photography, but will know all the answers, and still be full of the most shit.
Learn to disseminate. You'll know those talking shit from those who have a clue.
Your biggest critic is going to be you, except for me. And a host of other know-it-alls who couldn't distinguish a camera from a roll of film. That'll fuck-em. Should I have said a roll of film from a card-reader?:-)
You've done brilliant work previously. This one wasn't up there.
Go Again!! But don't post anything you're not 1000per cent sure about.
Good Luck, friend.
Saturday, June 22nd, 2013 on Presenting Polina
Give the guy a break. An experiment that failed and should never have seen the light of day. We both know that, and I'm pretty sure Erik does too.
Truth about this guy, he's shooting better work than Rylsky, Leonardo and Goncharov combined!!
Just a brain-snap. He'll come back and prove all you detractors wrong. I've seen his previous work, or most of it.
No. I think an experiment that went badly wrong.
Should never have been submitted. Erik is going to have work bloody hard, and fast, to rectify this. This shite, could ruin his rep completely.
Absolutely fucking Brilliant:-) I hope Erik takes it ALL on board.
Well said Solrage. Even I knew what you were talking about. Says a lot:-))
What planet are you transmitting from? I've seen you comments on hundreds os sites, and you generally have a handle on things. I tell you though, your parachute failed to open on this one.
Three of the top M-A shooters took a hit in 2012. Was it coke, money or plain fear, but all three stopped doing what they did best. Close-up, wet, not gushing, pussies.
Those 3? Rylsky, Leonardo and Goncharov. Rylsky's got his own banner now and really doesn't have to give a shit about what he posts here. 'Cept, I'll NEVER join his site!!!!
Leonardo is so pussy-whipped, he still can't shoot a close-up vagina from the same room. Across the street is OK, across the city is better. Goncharov? Dunno. He could be the next Banner shooter for M-A. God save us.
This set? It's drab. It's grey. It's as flat as a fucked sponge cake and half as tasty.
There is not one thing erotic or glamorous bout this set.
Saturday, June 22nd, 2013 on Simera
Let's ask a question - in response to your post. "Gynecology is fun, but not always necessary....." Says Whom? You? Sir, with respect, this site is an Erotic/Glamor/Soft Porn site.
As beautiful as Jackie D is, I have no reservations, nor argument on that. The lady is Stunningly Beautiful. She is Glamour to her painted toenails. But Erotic? Never, not in your Wettest dreams!! Soft Porn - like as in Minnie Mouse, Daisy Duck and Blondie (from the Dagwood comics).
Here's another word I've never used in any blog. Cunt. But here's the truth, Jackie keeps her CUNT, locked up tight in a cocoon. Just like a butterfly's chrysalis, Jackie manages to keep her cunt out of sight. ( I do HATE that word, but something has to bring this boring bitch to her senses!!:_((
Saturday, June 22nd, 2013 on Giorni
That's a thought. So why is she here? No bruises in sight if there is an insecure boyfriend......They generally put their foot down with a very heavy hand, especially with the girlfriend.......too spineless to face the photog.
uuusssee You and I DON'T agree in this instance. Jackie D is fuck-all except for a pretty face and nice tits.
First time in my life I've referred to a woman's bust/breasts as 'TITS':-( But this cunt-struck diva has nothing more to offer.
She's too pristine and pure, making too much money showing nothing, to actually become a human being, with feelings and emotions, to extend that to the camera.
As long as dull photographers, perspiring and sweating over her face, persist in hiring this self-centered diva, you'll see nothing more of her than a bloody cocoon.
Let's get one thing straight. I don't hate the girl. I'm disgusted with her, period. She's raking in money HoF and for what? Sweet F A!! THAT'S what. She's about as erotic as Minnie Mouse - if you're old enough to remember her.
It is sad, but I have to agree. I have given Flora some rave reviews at E-A, but unfortunately, she hasn't been able to transpose her work there to here.
The attraction to submersing a model in water, also staggers me. Every shooter who does this, and I mean, EVERY shooter, tries to make a story from a half-submerged wet, bedraggled model. You can't.
Felines don't like water. They drink it in extreme heat, will enter it for prey, and get the hell out real quick!! They seldom, if ever, frolic in water, because it is an unnatural sensation to their fur and skin. (Notice how dogs are different??? But dogs aren't felines:-)
You had this girl at your mercy. Then you immersed her in water. You can see the steam rising from the water, as the fire is doused!!!!
I'd like to see you working with Leonie on a set of sheets. You'd KILL it:-) Both of you;-)
Saturday, June 22nd, 2013 on Polytelia
I just came across this set and started reading all your comments about how beautiful this girl is. I wondered if I was missing something. Because she didn't, of first inspection, seem all that great.
Starting from scratch, I found Adriana to have faultless, beautiful green eyes, lovely teeth, a smile I would kill for, and a figure I'd crawl over broken glass and hot coals to claim.
I discovered the reason for this dull-looking set has nothing to do with Adriana. Two things would have enhanced this set, a more colorful setting, and a brighter color lipstick. So, Koenart and MUA, take note. If you haven't got a great background, include less of it in your shots. Keep your subject tighter. MUA, highlight her exceptional eyes more, and apply a gloss to her lips. Simple.
Saturday, June 22nd, 2013 on Suivre
To say you were merely 'Unfair' with your comments about Rilee, would be the understatement of the new millennium.
Conversely, your comments about Kent Hepburn were right on the mark. He absolutely Wrecked his 4 sets of Liz Ashley - the only ones she's sat for. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realise why.
I think, perhaps, you're sending the wrong person to rehab, though. Don't you???
Saturday, June 22nd, 2013 on Explotar
And I thought I was the only one to notice. Liz was humiliated, just as Rilee has been by this dork. As a photographer, I wouldn't trust him with a bloody pot!!!! What he hell is M-A thinking, promoting his amateurish B/S????
10's all round!
Friday, June 21st, 2013 on Morfi
He can't help his ignorance.
uuusssee, you and I agree. This is pretty much proof that this 'ratings' crap is in the eye of the beholder.
This is the first of Catherine's model I have kept, and purely for her facial expressions. To my thinking, she has gorgeous eyes and her mouth and smile is Angelic.
The rest is Art Class material. Me, I can't draw for shit, but I do know what constitutes Erotic Glamour, and that's the crucial element that is missing here.
I do a lot of work with 'Big Rigs' - road-trains of two to five trailers, and a lot of work on construction sites, landscapes, sea and cloudscapes, trees, flowers and historical sites.
If I muck up an image (and I do occasionally, lol), that image is binned. I can't afford to include dud images in my website. To do so, would cast a pall of doubt over my professionalism, to say nothing of the mess it makes of the site itself!!
Friday, June 21st, 2013 on Faithful
And what makes them so?? Is it because they have more posts than another shooter, say Arkisi, Alex Iskan, or Sergey Akion?? I'd really like to know how the "artists" are rated.
Rylsky, Goncharov, Leonardo & Erro were ONCE, much sought after favorite photographers I used to follow religiously. However, like Catherine, they all shoot work more suited to a "Live Model Art Class" and have done since early 2012. None are shooting the "Erotic Glamour", that this site originated as.
Sorry for sounding harsh Catherine, in this set there is One such image in this set. So I'm with 'uuusssee' and agree mostly with him. He is obviously more generous than I though.
Friday, June 21st, 2013 on Lirika
Katy is more than just an adorable bird with beautiful eyes, sultry smile, great breasts and stunning pussy:-) A multi-talented young lady, she's also a runner. Don't just love those slender ankles, and look at those fantastic calf-muscles, the tone of her thighs - wouldn't I just Love them keeping my ears warm:-)
Then Natasha turns this sexy, sensually divine Goddess into an attractive store window dummy. Grrrrrr!!!!!:-((
Wednesday, June 19th, 2013 on Katy N
Definitely looking for lots more of the stunning Ralina:-)
Hopefully Ratmir Aliev will be back here too:-)
Tuesday, June 18th, 2013 on Ralina A
Ralina enjoyed this set very much. Very enthusiastic and totally wild and uninhibited.
Well done Ratmir And Raline. The best set in the series:-)
Tuesday, June 18th, 2013 on Imalia
Almost 3 hours to download these 18 stunning sets of one of the most sensationally gorgeous and attractive young women on M-A.
What STUNS me, is 6 photographers could retire this beautiful, exciting and energetic young lady so abruptly.
I think all you guys should go sit in the corner with that funny cone hat on your head, with the big letter 'D' for Dunce on it, for letting Frances go at all!! For Any reason!!
Perhaps a couple of dozen update sets of this exquisite beauty would atone for your lapse in concentration and appreciation of pure beauty since SEPTEMBER 28, 2011!!!! Cheers:-) Thanks guys.
And while you're at it, remind Frances that her 5,515 fans out here are all-but Demanding her return to M-A.
Tuesday, June 18th, 2013 on Frances A
The undeniable fact remains, and is patently obvious Mr. Murano. Every woman you get in front of your camera, no matter how beautiful to begin with, ends as a veritable Princess.
Frances is no exception. Beautiful to begin with, has an almost matchless beauty 10 minutes in.
Stunning work. Faultless!!:-)
Tuesday, June 18th, 2013 on Presenting Frances
I can think of nothing LESS toxic, than this 2-legged vision of pure feminine beauty. Especially for her work with Mr. Arkisi, rather than the stultifying, repetitious, mediocre sets from Angela.
Who needs vitamin supplements after looking at Toxic?? She's truly invigorating.
I've been wondering though, how she came up with that name, TOXIC. Then it occurred to me, that one viewing of her boggles the mind so completely, that no superlatives can truly describe her.
I hope she's back soon. More work with Mr. A would be superlative:-)
Monday, June 17th, 2013 on Toxic A
How could you guys have let this stunningly beautiful Tory D escape without a whimper from either of you!!??
Her updates/new sets should be appearing MONTHLY!!
You should be chasing her through the Urals, across the Steppes, all over Siberia - make that all of Europe, to get her before your lenses again!!!!
Monday, June 17th, 2013 on Tory D
LMFAO!! I pity those 4 poor suckers who missed the essence of your tale.
But I do agree with the nut-case of a driver. Either of us could have had this delicious piece of candy melting in our hands, and wouldn't that be nice. Everything should taste so sweet:-)
Monday, June 17th, 2013 on Nikia A
It's not the model who's in training. It's the bloody photographer, and judging from this entire series, he's got to get back to the basics.
These are nothing more than family album shoots.
I don't know if it's affiliation to M-A or being named as one of their 'top' photographers, but since early 2012, Rylsky's work degenerated beyond belief.
If he went back to his work in 2011 and earlier, he would see how ludicrous and short-of-the-mark his current work is.
Get a grip, Rylsky, please.
Looking at your solo sets Malena, I think you're more 'Iron Inducing' than a tonne of Vitamin E tablets:-) - even in jeans and top:-)
But to make my Top 100, I'd like to see more expression, teasing, openness from your pussy.
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Malena Morgan
I don't know that it's despicable per se - it is certainly a waste of time, money and band-wide. I don't see the point of duets.
To say these sets are mediocre is higher praise than they're worth. And it is not the fault of LILI, the model used.
This young lady should make the top 10 in anyone's collection. The photography employed here though, the unfortunate lass doesn't even make my top 100, and I blame the photographers entirely, for their flat, bland, one-dimensional efforts.
It's not surprising there's been nothing new in 12 months and no earlier comments. She is portrayed as nothing more lively than a department store mannequin.
Somebody get her back and use your imagination when working with her.
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Lili H
Lida is very beautiful, very uninhibited, very sexy and very easy to like a lot!!:-) Get the message??:-)
This is a gorgeous set you two have put together.
It has been a long time between drinks though. I hope I don't die of thirst before her next set appears;-)
Saturday, June 15th, 2013 on Presenting Lida
Kitty sits proudly in first equal on my Top 10 list:-) Another 8 or 50 sets and she's have the position on her own!!:-)
Thank you Kitty, for sharing your absolute perfection.
Thanks also to Giovanni and Leonardo for bringing unique, one-of-a-kind beauty to our attention. You have both worked superbly with this glamorous lady.
I'm not a fan of models in water, but Giovanni, that opening set with Kitty in the raging river is stunning work from both of you. The markings on the plane in Decoller also gave me the location of the shoot. Terrific.
Leonardo, the image size in your sets is fantastic, sharp and great camera work.
The MUAH is to be lauded too, for Kitty's make-up and hair. Just loved her pony-tail in Foret, and the Autumn colors are truly stunning. I can't pick a 'Best' set.
Saturday, June 15th, 2013 on Kitty B
I am absolutely floored by this young woman's pure innocence and beauty:-)
Just looking into her eyes requires me to have a cold shower and a lie-down. Kitty is so intoxicating, it wouldn't be safe to drive after viewing her sets.
The touch and taste of her perfect mouth would drive me to ecstasy, and to imbibe in her 'loving cup' would be spell-binding.
Thank you Kitty for sharing your satin-like beauty.
Saturday, June 15th, 2013 on Right
The dual posting was entirely accidental, but perhaps if M-A were to get more of the same, they might begin to take notice of their members. After all, they do say WE are the backbone of the site, and that they try to give us want we want. We all know what B/S that is!!
Saturday, June 15th, 2013 on Kitana A
Kitana deserves more respect than has been shown her here.
Or is it us, the subscribers to M-A???? Not all of us can afford an annual fee of $600+ to join every site M-A has put together to extract more money from the gullible members. And that's what we are if we chase after everything M-A has to offer!!!!
Just because Kitana is now on SexArt and LifeErotic doesn't mean her existence here should be terminated so abruptely!!
Tony M, Mr. Arkisi, Alex Iskan - Anyone?? Who is going to pick up the baton so ignominiously dropped by Ingret?? Has he expired, or what??
Izolda is far from a 'Spent Force'. She remains in my Top 10, though she hasn't worked since October 2012.
Guys, we KNOW what we're missing!!
Friday, June 14th, 2013 on Izolda A
Catherine, dating a woman, is like dining in a 5***** restaurant. I might add, it works in reverse - women react in exactly the same manner.
The meal starts with an appetizer, the lips. Then the entree - her breasts. Finally it's the main course - I'll let your imagination take over for a minute:) If the first 3 courses were all good, they'll have dessert.
In your restaurant, there is a surplus of appetizer and entree. You throw them around, artfully I might add, and with gay abandon. But the main course, if it exists, is miniscule, and there's Never any dessert.
I am not a fan, not because your models are ugly, and you're a dud photographer - neither is true. Your models are always divine, and your ability as a professional, is well documented, at least here on M-A.
I do not follow you because there is never enough labia/pussy, call it what you will.
The sexiest part of any female is her brain. Yep, I firmly believe that:) The second sexiest, and the 2nd most import and the hardest to get at, rests, tightly guarded, by her thighs. (It takes a lot of appetizer and entree to get there:)
So the bottom line, shoot more of her labia, the closer and creamier the better.
I apologise humbly, for not being a bigger fan, but thank you most profusely for taking the time in reading this.
Friday, June 14th, 2013 on Probablo
Your incessant shouting on this site led me to believe you were, you know, a bit backward mentally. Retarded in other words.
But the way you structure your sentences shows a measure of intelligence does exist.
The only other reasons I can think of for your obnoxious shouting is you're either very insecure, or just a bloody loud-mouth.
Which ever is the case, because you are educated, you should know that to get someone to listen to your opinion, speak quietly, force them to hear what you have to say.
Further, because your attitude is basically as rude as it can get on the web, I was more critical of these images than I would have been without your input. She is beautiful, of that there is no doubt. But she doesn't/didn't drive me crazy.
Thursday, June 13th, 2013 on Gracy Taylor
Yeah. If she'd been my date, (I should be so lucky!!:-), I'd have gotten rid of the pantyhose sooner too. Thing about these pantyhose though, there was no ugly gusset completely hiding Zsanett's fabulous pussy.
That said, her pussy should be uninhibited at All times.
Top 100, yes. Top 10, definitely. (#2). Petting your pussy more would definitely produce the desired results;-)
Thursday, June 13th, 2013 on Excitatio
Well said:-) LMFHO:-) (sorry about the caps;-)
Thursday, June 13th, 2013 on Manners
What has the night before got to do with it???? She's comfortable, feels safe with her shooter, likes her job and she GETS OFF, teasing us guys out here. Simple.
Thank you Flavia for expressing yourself so truthfully, and Leonardo for bringing Flavia in all her beautiful glory to us. Truth in photography!! I LOVE it:-)
I'd like to be the first to welcome the REAL Leonardo back.
For 12 months some arsehole has been posting, using Leonardo's name. But this set really has given us the Real Deal. Except, all images were taken from across the town, hundreds of yards away.
The Good news is you've upgraded your equipment to a fantastic image size. If you had gotten into the same room as Flavia, and shot her hips, with her pussy erupting as it is from just a couple of feet, how good would THAT have been?:-)
For me, her name said it all.
I don't think she's been inside a house since she first walked solo outside.
I think she prefers the stars when it's fine or a tent or cave when it's wet.
I think she prefers a camp cooker or open fire to electricity.
I think she's a Dreadnaught. A Pocket Battleship. A Dare-devil. A sexy, wonton female who would definitely look scrumptious indoors with candles and wearing lace - or nothing.
But we Definitely need more of her. LOTS more.
Thursday, June 13th, 2013 on Firebird A
Thursday, June 13th, 2013 on Lucky 8
It is nice to read someone so generous and easy to please.
I am a lot less generous and easy to please, but when a set gives me the images I enjoy, I'll be the first and loudest to shout it from the roof tops.
Edwidge has been a favorite of mine from her first set, but as yet can't crack the Top 100. This set was little more than a 'tits and knickers' show.
There was nothing here that was 'physically volcanic' or 'psychic releasing' for me. By golly, your terms in phraseology show me you are a very educated guy. Seriously.
For a set to be physically volcanic, in my opinion, the Mount has to erupt. I'm not talking Vesuvius or Krakatoa, I'm talking more about Mt. Ruapehu in NZ, which blows every few years, with little, but some lava making it to the cone.
The physically volcanic part, is where the model is obviously comfortable in her surroundings and with her shooter. The Psychic Release is the knowledge that this 'comfort' allows the model to tease the hell out of her viewers.
That's my idea of the 'Perfect' set.
LOL:-) I had to check it out, and you're right.
There is an image on this site that I've seen but can't remember the model or date. It was a similar pose with her legs wide. In the previous long shots her pussy is wide open, demanding closer inspection, but in this shot you couldn't define her pussy from the rest of her hip area and the most prominent 3rd of the image were her nostrils.
It formed my opinion that there is nothing less glamorous, or erotic than inspecting a woman's nostrils under a microscope. (You do that when you enlarge this image).
Added to that, there were only 5 'real' pussy shots - you can't count 103, or anything from 115 as 'pussy shots'. Adding insult to injury, one of those 5 had her pussy out of focus.
When are these photogs going to get the message that an unfocused image is dumb, stupid and damaging to their claim of professionality. (Credibility as professionals).
I'm sorry Matiss, but you have dropped the ball and lost the game. Not just once, but four (4) times!! That, is inexcusable. You're paid to produce and I quote '.....to give what the subscribers want......'
If this was a game of cricket, tennis football, whatever, you'd be dropped from the team for this effort.
Wednesday, June 12th, 2013 on Alessandra A
After reading all the comments posted here, there is one fact you guys are either missing or totally unaware of. And that in itself is strange, because you seem you have picked up on stuff that I have missed - Photoshopped arms in this set, for one.
I joined M-A in 2010. At the time there was one affiliate - Erro. Early in 2012, April about, other sub-sites stated to arrive. Sex-Art I think was the first, Eternal Desire and others soon followed. All are pay-to-view sites. In other words, Members Only.
From about April 2012, there was a sudden drop-off in pussy shots, especially close-up work. The 'eruptive' pussies seen through 2011 and early 2012 are now on these other sites - the greed for the almighty $ has gripped M-A fiercely!!
So we can't blame the shooters exclusively. The root of the problem lies with the puritanical retarded goof-balls that run this site.
In the chase for the almighty $, they're ignoring their own 1st paragraph of their Philosophy, of giving the members what the want. But that's not quite right either. You can still get what you want, but you have to join, and pay for another dozen sites to do so.
Wednesday, June 12th, 2013 on Besoins
And the reason should be as obvious as Pinocchio's nose.
After any form of water sets - sea, river, bath, shower etc, etc, sand is without doubt the most over-used, unattractive situation to put any woman in.
At the very least, she will be uncomfortable and itchy. At at it's worst, it's not a fun place for romance:)
You're forgive:) I think we all understood;)
May we have more of this provocative young lady please Mr. Arkisi. She is simply too sexy and gorgeous to be neglected like some derelict old building.
On her pole would be good, with her hair loose and flying - perhaps in sexy bra and panties:)?
Tuesday, June 11th, 2013 on Amy Moore
You have done some truly stunning work with this adorable, beautiful Tamara.
You have given us ample proof in headshots, breast, hand and feet shots, but unfortunately you have not presented her pussy with the same intensity or perfection as her head and breast shots.
In this set, you came close to rectifying that anomaly. Almost.
It is to be hoped that you will do many more sets with Tamara, and hopefully devote as much attention to her pussy, as you do to her other sexy parts:-) Intimate close-ups are greatly appreciated:-)
Monday, June 10th, 2013 on Nest
The scars are obvious in at least on shot. The one shot I looked at was enough to keep me out.
Monday, June 10th, 2013 on Abrazos
And that's plenty.
Hear Hear!! She is absolutely stunning down to her shoulders, but the boob-job is a mess.
I like a nice cleavage as much as the next bloke, but breasts have never been that important to me, as long as they're perky:)
She should keep her bra on.
I don't think Alex has ever shot a 'bad' set. The only thing I have against this set is, unless taken from a distance to keep the entire image in focus, pussy shots should be just that. Sharp and focused.
But as I crop and enlarge to my hearts content, Thank you Rinna for your generosity, and Alex for keeping your work honest!!:-)
Monday, June 10th, 2013 on Ferveo
You are so right.
It's a bit of a conundrum though, that a lot of models prefer to be shot by women photographers, but then are never as expressive when posing,as they are when sitting for males. Go figure.
Monday, June 10th, 2013 on Camena
100% agree with your comments. It's the best set I've seen from Angela too. I don't think models open up the same with women photogs as they do with men. Rachel, while displaying her pussy readily enough didn't spread her lips as she does with Arkisi, for example.
I also think water is an over-used setting, and find nothing erotic in looking at a drowned pussy.
I also have a pretty liberal view on so-called porn. There is nothing pornographic about the female genitalia, even if there's a slight eruption. All that tells me is the model is really relaxed in her surroundings, is enjoying her work, and gets turned on by the fact she's giving a lot of pleasure to those viewing her pics.
So Thank you Rachel for your unfettered enthusiasm and generosity in sharing your beauty, and to the photographers who bring it to us.
Perhaps she is shy? But she is modelling for an 'Erotic Glamor/SoftPorn' site. There's nothing much of anything here.
Sunday, June 9th, 2013 on Orsi A
Let's say OF the Stunning Oliwia...... Sorry.
Sunday, June 9th, 2013 on Oliwia A
Another set or 12 the Stunning Oliwia, in short order, would be appreciated. Thank you both.
Best set in the series Antonio, but I think you took a beating from the Retards in control here, because in the next two sets there was little, if any reference to Oliwia's Golden Honeypot.
Pretiosa (#9), is getting back there:-) Here's hoping 2013 will be another year where the models can express their enjoyment of the shoot, by getting off on the idea of turning us on.
I know she has more than just green fingers with plants:) She makes me grow too;-)
Thank you both for sharing these fabulous images.
Sunday, June 9th, 2013 on Desir
I first saw this crochet dress on Anna AJ, and several others since. Both with Voronin AND Leonardo. And I'm not complaining!!!!! Pity there's not more of it.
One wonders though, are they not in fact, one and the same person? How many models started with Voronin and continued with Leonardo, but never the other way around? Curiouser and curiouser:)
Saturday, June 8th, 2013 on Presenting Natalia
Abso-bloody-lutely!! I don't know quite what era of the Dark Ages Natasha was striving for, but the green/black hues put me in mind of a dungeon below the French guillotine!! Perhaps the light in the window comes from Joan of Arc at the stake!! Depressing. Abominably so!!
All that said, Nata is undeniably beautiful, stunning figure, and Natasha really got what she was after - in spades:) So I doff my hat to her, and her perception. It took guts and imagination to create this set.
Saturday, June 8th, 2013 on Ademais
You need to get together with the Magnificent Manta, like yesterday, to arrange another set or 12!! ;-) ;-)
Saturday, June 8th, 2013 on Monta A
Such a beautiful young woman Koenart. These Latvian beauties are giving the delectable Ukrainians a run for their money:)
Stunning sets, with #'s 3 & 5 being my favorites. In set 5, her delicious pussy demands licking, sucking and ...... eating??:)
Saturday, June 8th, 2013 on Monika F
I totally agree. It's probably the flattest, one-dimensional, boring crap sets I've seen on Met-Art. It's not alone, however.
Is this site for the subscribers who pay to view this shit getting what they expect, or do we have to submit to some dick-wit photographers' idea of art??
Saturday, June 8th, 2013 on Oscula
I wonder who the negative, spineless slob is, visiting the site?
Saturday, June 8th, 2013 on Marica A
An OLD saying for you to consider -
'You can please some of the people some of the time, but never please everybody all the time.....'
Another? 'One man's meat is another man's poison....' For the ill-informed, this one was originally stated in relation to scripted medications. What suits your neighbour, will not necessarily suit you. Ring a bell?
What really pisses me off about your comment, you have nothing positive to say about either Macy or Arkisi. Just detrimental B/S directed at both!!
Saturday, June 8th, 2013 on Seraglio
Macy B's sets are just one reason I seek you out before other 'high profile' names like Rylsky, Leonardo, Goncharov etc.
Along with the much malined Loretta A, Macy's sets are stunningly beautiful, giving us the lady as she is, not as some 'artistic wannabe' thinks she should look.
That said, after 8 shoots with you, she should be confident enough to let the 'caterpillar' out of it's cocoon, and let her butterfly spread her beautiful wings.;)
Your ego, Rylsky, far out-weighs your photographic ability.
Saturday, June 8th, 2013 on Luciana A
Loretta might be tiny, but like Maurice Chevalier said, "Thank Heaven for Little Girls....." (From the 1958 movie Gigi with Leslie Caron in the title role).
Loretta is my idea of perfection, rated a perfect 10 and has taken the role of #1 in my Top 100 - so far I've only got 82 - but counting:)
She is so sexily sensual, totally feminine and so uninhibited, I'm stunned such comments as some of those above, could even be considered.
Arkisi has Aced the Deck with this vibrantly sexual young woman, and her sets will hopefully outnumber even those of Anna AJ.
Friday, June 7th, 2013 on Loretta A
LMFAO. You are very perceptive.
Friday, June 7th, 2013 on Lily J
You were way too generous with Koenart. I have always trusted his work in the past. I can't explain why, but I browsed these sets first, and I'm glad I did. Sand and sea do not a Glamor model make!! I'll wait until Lily is posed sensually indoors.
Friday, June 7th, 2013 on Naturo
You're the first to mention it, and you're right. Her body melds with the sand making her hair the only point of focus. Same goes for the previous sets.
A sandy pussy is not glamorous and a long way short of erotic. 3 sets in sea and sand?? This beauty belongs indoors in sexy lingerie.
Another of your fabulously beautiful women we could with more of. A lot more.
Every one of your models become princesses in front of your camera, and it's exciting, and a pleasure to view your work. Lea, along with Lauren, is another updates of, would be greatly appreciated.
Friday, June 7th, 2013 on Lea C
btw - GMEG - Grand Master of Erotic Glamour.
Friday, June 7th, 2013 on Lauren C
Would Mr. Tony Murano GMEG, please consider updating the stunningly beautiful Miss Lauren C please.
Lauren rocks-my-world, especially on your sets:)
The only thing that disappointed me about these sets - they were way too small. 70 images a pop, to my thinking, was 50 too few.
120+ image sets in future please. Pretty Please??
Friday, June 7th, 2013 on Lara D
A perfect example of feminine beauty, which is M-A's trade-mark.
It's such a shame though, that the only 'wet pussies' we are allowed to view here, are those whom Rylsky so tiresomely continues to dump into water.
Thursday, June 6th, 2013 on Shereen A
I don't care personally, if it's candle-power or light bulb, but I DO like to see what I'm eating:)
Perfection from head to toe. Karina doesn't even have a freckle out of place:)
Great work by two top photogs when working with this beautiful young woman.
Thursday, June 6th, 2013 on Karina O
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Popolare
Join the queue.
I'd just LOVE to see you in the same position - centerfold for which, Cleo or Playgirl. Take your pick. After 5 takes, YOU show the world, and everyone on set, how great is, no heating other than the lights, you tell us how you get all cheered up, smiling non-stop for three hours, if you're lucky enough to do the shoot in three hours. Most of these shoots go for 8. And days at a time.
I do agree though, kneeling before the fountain is the less messy way to drink;)
The pout is Brigette Bardot SEXY:) Not old enough to remember Brigette???:) She's 78 now, but boy, oh boy, in the 50's & 60's she was every schoolboy's wet dream. She was only in her 20's even THEN. (25 when I first learned about her in 1959)
Who cares? Must admit though, I've been too busy studying her lips, eyes, breasts, nipples, navel, legs (etc), to care about the color of the roots of her hair. There's just too much more to take delight in:)
Give the girl a bloody chance please:) It's her 5th only, set.
Some models can, and do come on set, throw their clothes in a corner and be ready to show all, to all. Not all can.
By the time Jennifer gets there, you and I will both be chomping at the bit, and if #76 in this set is any indication, she'll knock our socks off!!
Patience, my friend.
Dear LINUXmaniac, you really are, a brain-dead insulting slob.
Nobody here begrudges you your opinion, but you actually know nothing.
Personally, I have spent 63 of my 68 years behind a camera, both as an amateur and as a professional. I have photographed many different situations, from glamour portfolios to heavy machinery on construction sites, and I can tell you from first-hand experience, in the world of modelling, no-one, and I mean NO-ONE is an expert at the first shoot.
Give the girl a break, you slovenly fool. You have no idea. And you cannot, judge anyone's attitude, feelings or attitude in any situation from a photograph, unless you've been there, done that.
And you have done neither. You vocabulary is your biggest enemy.
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Jennifer Mackay
Your education, or lack-there-of is showing. Your vocabulary is atrocious. It would be better if you kept your mouth shut.
Or at least, put your brain into gear before offering your opinion.
Your pseudo should be simply LINUXlunatic
Absolutely truthful rockhard. It is so easy to be critical, especially when you're
b: full of dope
c: really know anything about what's taking place.
Jennifer is relatively new to this and even with one photog and his crew, takes a lot of getting used to. As often as not, photogs will use different MUA&H's, different support crew, and each time she's facing new faces, opening herself for the world to see, is daunting. She's the only one naked, with all these strangers about.
On top of that, she (probably), will read those stupid, inane and ill-advised comments from arseholes who know no better, but whose words she will find humiliating.
Some weeks ago I read where someone was lamenting the loss of the scale system. 1 - 10, like E-A still operates with.
These pricks would still vote lowly, the effect little different from their comments, but at least a little less insulting.
I hope Mr. Arkisi will take a stand for her - though are they worth it?
Not bad for an old married lady. Great pics:) Lovely to look at. Wish she were mine:)
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Jasmine C
Me, I'm a steak and spuds kinda guy. Give me pussy over shoes any day, 24/7:)
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Futuro
1st set with a drowned model. 'Nuff for me Rylsky. I'm outta here.
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Janelle B
Rylsky and his bloody water!! He must shoot the dirtiest models on the planet!! Why else this fixation??
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Presenting Janelle
She's a very sloppy 44" - not 34!!
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Janelle A
She has not the intelligence, desire or freedom of expression to be an erotic glamour model. Send her home!!
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Giorni
So do I mate. And let's face it, pussy, butterfly etc - name it as you will, is the most sexsationally educational toy ever invented. A joy to play with and learn from, because they're all different.
Someone said 'she didn't have the lips for it'. I disagree - personally. I don't think she has her mind on her work/doesn't care about what she's being paid good money for.
Any model, modelling in an Erotic Glamour genre, has to enjoy her work, have a great rapport with her photographer and crew, and be focused on how she can best present herself to the paying public.
My opinion, Jackie is modelling for the money only - crap to anything else.
She has been 'just a little shy' for a long time - too long in my opinion.
I don't know where you're getting 'her naughtiest bits':) Care to share??
You have not seen Jackie D on Met-Art in a full-on spread. Her pussy remains locked in a cocoon no matter how wide she spreads her legs. Long ago I put her in a file 'Emotionally Frigid' with Iveta B. It's a shame. Adding a pussy to this truly beautiful woman would make my day - Sorry Clint:)
2012 seems to have rung the 'death-nell' for some of the most beautiful women on Met-Art. Not the least being IZOLDA!!:( Shame on you Ingret for ignoring her for so long.
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Izolda A
20 disappointing sets of a beautiful model. I don't think she thawed out from the 2nd set until the last. Were you naked in snow 5 times Oleg???
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Izabelle A
Beautiful model, with a stunning bust when you consider their size. But what's the point of having great breasts if there's no pussy to go with them??
Tuesday, June 4th, 2013 on Izabella A
Look at the number of affiliated sites she's on mate. Every one costs you about $40 to join if you want to see more of Iwia!! The pursuit of the Almighty Demon Dollar is alive and well at Met-Art!!!!!
Tuesday, June 4th, 2013 on Iwia A
Mediocrity at its disappointing worst.
Tuesday, June 4th, 2013 on Iveta C
Only 225 images of this beautiful, explosive young woman??
Gyana expresses a freedom of inhibition not often found even in erotic glamour sites.
She obviously has a great rapport with you, Mr. Arkisi, so please don't leave us waiting too much longer for more of your work with her. It's almost 12 months already!!:(
Monday, June 3rd, 2013 on Gyana A
Absolutely amazing work with Gyana for her first shoot. What an awesome communication you must have had with this dynamic young woman.
What a electrifying presence Gyana has. A real, live Pocket Rocket who could cause any man to explode:) !!
Thanks to you both for sharing this realistic, undiluted set.
Monday, June 3rd, 2013 on Presenting Gyana
Not as expressive as your first set, Mr. Arkisi. The retards controlling M-A must have gotten to you:(
Still a beautiful set, though her panties needed closer attention:)
When are you bringing her back?? Please ensure her fabulous butterfly accompanies her when you do:)
Thanks for this deliciously beautiful young woman.
Monday, June 3rd, 2013 on Minoan
This girl should never have been allowed to escape!! She is beautiful in every aspect, from her head to toe. She also has the most sensational butterfly I've ever seen - resting. What a stunning creation it would be in full flight. That's a vision we never did see. And that's a pity.
How about capturing her butterfly in its full glory:) Who is game??
Thank you Flora for your enthusiasm in your work, and to Ron & Antonio for these wonderful sets. And to all of you - Thanks for sharing.
Monday, June 3rd, 2013 on Flora A
Totally with you on this!! What's the point of including a delicious, pouting pussy out of focus?? Has Rylsky ever looked at a printed image that is not fully focused. Doesn't he realise how inane, off-putting and ludicrous it looks? And let's be honest, it's not 'soft-focus' that Bob Guccione did-to-death in the 70's, it's just poor/lazy photography.
However, it is so pleasing to see the return of honesty in photography, in that the girl's enthusiasm and enjoyment was evident in two clear shots.
Sunday, June 2nd, 2013 on Derecho
Truth in advertising, truth in sentencing, both are B/S, but there is no denying the return of Truth in Art. Thank you Candy Rose and Rylsky, for bringing us the truth - women DO get of when posing for all us randy buggers out here:)
Saturday, June 1st, 2013 on Pegasus
Outrageously beautiful, even for her tiny size. An absolute Pocket-Rocket! Hope to see much more of your work with her Arkisi. She has no inhibitions or hang-ups. An absolute Doll.
Saturday, June 1st, 2013 on Ardelia A
LMFAO:) Whoops, forgot caps-lock:)
Perfectly sculptured body, beautiful eyes and smile and Great captures.
I do have to wonder though, What does her pussy look like. Hope to find out in your June submission:)
Wednesday, May 29th, 2013 on Alessandra A
Is it your eye-sight or the auto-focus on your camera Cloud? Whatever the problem, a set that started so beautifully with the lighting was ruined (I'm inclined to use stronger language!!!!), by your over-use of selective focusing. The three most import images in the set, #', 101, 102 & 103 are just some examples of what I'm talking about.
Zlatka is a stunning woman, perfect breasts and she isn't too shy to put her delicious pussy on display.
If you like a pose, take 4 shots - head, bust, hips and full-frame if you must - you're using digital for crissakes, so you're not wasting film or time, and in print, she doesn't look ridiculous.
You need some variety from full-frame anyway. Headshots, eyes, mouth, breasts and thighs all make spectacular shots. Especially with a woman with the assets Zlatka possesses.
Wednesday, May 29th, 2013 on Konphet
It DID take Arkisi to bring us her true beauty. Rylsky started off OK with his attempt at a fashion shoot, but as soon as her clothes were off, so was the color. One dimensional, black and brown lifeless rubbish was the result.
From being one of my most sought-after shooters, Rylsky has dropped off my radar over the past 12+ months. The BIG $ signs are flashing brilliantly around M-A!! They can dupe more money out of their subscribers by opening other, more graphic sites. That's why we have to join Rylsky Art and Eternal Desire(?) to find more explicit (maybe) work of Zelda.
Tuesday, May 28th, 2013 on Zelda B
B/S!! Violla is more than merely pretty. She's been beautifully posed, the colors are vibrant and the photography as smooth as a baby's bum.
Tuesday, May 28th, 2013 on Fundar
A serendipious (supercalifragalistic) set Violla & Matiss:)
Absolutely true. Those vivid red and greens, add a 3rd dimension to this set. These images almost pop out of the screen:)
LMFAO:) You're SO right, mate.
I tend to agree, that the plain white background was a bit too artsy-fartsy for my taste. However, Sapphira was obviously comfortable and relaxed with Luca in both shoots.
One thing in favor of the white, it made Sapphira the center of attention. Sapphira reminds me of a lollipop. Suck and lick, suck and lick........:) A very beautiful woman who deserves all the accolades she gets.
Thank you for sharing, and for the honest photography.
Monday, May 27th, 2013 on Sapphira A
I loved your work so much Sandy, I'm hoping you'll get back to Balius very soon and shoot some more. LOTS more:) Thanks for sharing:)
Monday, May 27th, 2013 on Sandy C
Rylsky has forgotten a lot of things, including the first paragraph of M-A/E-A Philosophy, which reads in part ".......to bring the subscribers what they want....." Neither site is doing this and hasn't since Jan 2012.
Rylsky has also forgotten how/where to focus his camera, and forgotten the importance of color. His sets have become flat and boring.
Yes, I agree the white wall is bouncing a lot of the light, causing this problem here, but he's experienced enough to have considered this. Isn't he??
Monday, May 27th, 2013 on Seducidos
NIKIA, you are a truly beautiful young woman. Your hair, (rollers or not;), the promise your eyes convey, such a succulent mouth, perfect breasts, slim waist, to your gorgeous legs. You are vibrant and enthusiastic about your hobby. Glamourous Perfection.
The above is obvious even from the flat, one-dimensional, colorless images Rylsky has taken of you. I love you for your effervescence and innocence, but any other photographer would have you surrounded by color, and popping out of the computer monitor.
Monday, May 27th, 2013 on Nikia A
Hey Catherine:) Great 1st-up presentation of Monika. She appears pretty amenable, and obviously enjoyed, and was comfortable during the shoot.
I am a nature lover, and have made the study of butterflies a serious hobby. I love the different shapes, colors and sizes. It would be great to see Monika in full-flight, wings spread and glistening:)
P.S. The only way I like rump, is char-grilled, with a side of a dozen oysters - au naturale :))
Thank you both for sharing.
Sunday, May 26th, 2013 on Presenting Monika
Precisely how an erotic, glamour model should look. Stunning work, MIRA and HIGINIO :) ;)
Sunday, May 26th, 2013 on Presenting Mira
What erotic glamour is all about!!:) Congrats to Mila & Matiss!!
Yes, I too, would like to see her very edible butterfly with its beautiful wings spread in anticipation and expectancy:)
Sunday, May 26th, 2013 on Mila M
About as erotic as a Disney cartoon. I'm disappointed Koenart.
Sunday, May 26th, 2013 on Mila J
Someone should tap Mr. Rylsky on the shoulder - wake him up. It's a month past since his last submission. I hope Feeona doesn't become one of the 'forgotten':((
Thursday, May 23rd, 2013 on Feeona A
Is there a GOOD reason for this young woman who did everything but turn herself inside-out for Albert Varin, to be ignored for Four (4) years????
Thursday, May 23rd, 2013 on Faina A
I apologise for the errors (spelling), in my earlier submission. You'll the gist of my message none-the-less. Thanks.
Thursday, May 23rd, 2013 on Eveline A
An Open letter to Mr. Tony Murano -
For three years I have by-passed this young lady, and I can't explain why.
Over the passed 3 months I have been searching for you work because it seemed, after the Retarded, puritanical Grandmas who mod this site brought in their draconian law that 'Wt pussies are a no-no', you have dropped off the map.
Since the beginning of March, I have looked for new work from you with the 280+ Met-Art models I have collected since mid-2012. Having found little, I decided on looking at those I'd previously ignored and found EVELINE, with whom you have worked with on 3 previous occasions.
You did not let me down. In fact, having rated you previously as The KoP, (King of Pussy), I've had amend your rating to GMEGP.
You are the Grand Master of Erotic, Glamour Photography. You have no peer. Many live in your country, some in your town, fewer still in your suburb, and even less in your street. None live next door!
I hope this vindictive destruction of Met-Art ceases soon, one or two have thumbed their nose at this 'Wet Pussy' stupidity, after all, it is only a $sign thing, and perhaps we'll see you submitting you superlative work once more.
Many Thanks for your previous contributions.
What you got Right here, Goncharov, were the 11 SOLO videos of a fabulous, incredibly beautiful woman. What you got so drastically wrong here, was including other females in 5 of your 11 stills sets. What?? She's not beautiful enough to stand alone?? She put all the other girls in a shadow. Added to that, when you DID pose her solo, you had no idea what to do with her.
We haven't seen the best of EVA by a long shot. I hope we do!!
Wednesday, May 22nd, 2013 on Eva E
A very beautiful young model who was obviously relaxed and confident in your company. Her enthusiasm for her work shows in every set. More sets of this lovely lass would not go amiss, especially if her delectable pussy opened wide:)
Tuesday, May 21st, 2013 on Diana I
I don't know why I over-looked this model for so long. Athletic, flexible, gorgeous, knock-your-socks-off figure. Yeah. Just WOW!! Thank you Diana and Koenart.
Tuesday, May 21st, 2013 on Diana G
Koenart is one of the top photographers on this site because he delivers what 99.99% of us want. His images are vibrant, colorful and tell a story. His models too, are equally artistic and enthusiastic to create Art.
Buy yourself a camera and learn a little about photography, art and the creation and structure of images. Then come back and say his work leaves you cold. And show us why.
A truly beautiful young lady is CONNY:) Pity none of her sets didn't promote that beauty more specifically. Ken got close, but Samo.......!!:( And Luca, you have done much better than this.
Monday, May 20th, 2013 on Conny Carter
IT is very sad, that Cloud has only two sets in 12 months. Shew begs in her bio, to be photographed!! Please??
Sunday, May 19th, 2013 on Cloud A
Credit where credit is due - but there's little credit here. Varin shot 16 sets, 1,961 images and not one pussy. To many 'spread' shots to register, but not once was Bridget 'switched on', much less 'turned on'. Pity.
Sunday, May 19th, 2013 on Bridgit A
This girl just 'TOO HOT' for the all-new puritanical Met-Art, huh????
Saturday, May 18th, 2013 on Amy A
A LOT of the problem lies entirely in the hands of the puritanical attitude of the mods of this site. Sometime in the middle of 2012, about the time The Life Erotic came on line,word went out that wet pussies are an absolute no-no!! That was because the new site was all about masturbation. I can't be too specific with the date, but around that time, and for some months, pussy shots were virtually nil.
Leonardo was the first I noticed - went from shooting close-ups to shooting from across town with a long lens. When did he shoot his last really brilliant work. Tony Murano, in my mind, the King of Pussy, when did he last submit? I haven't seen anything new from him in months.
Met-Art is going backwards we're heading towards Playboy pre-1972 the year of the first Full-frontal with pubic hair was shown. Marilyn Cole was the British model photographed. (Can't remember the month, sorry).
Met-Art is rapidly becoming over-priced, from a Progressive site, to a retarded site.
Saturday, May 18th, 2013 on Aljena A
Stunning body, beautiful features, dynamite butt, with a pussy that works:) Her butterfly in full flight would be a sight to see!! MORE of Valeri PLEASE:)
Friday, May 17th, 2013 on Valeri B
6 wonderful sets of a stunningly beautiful young woman I hope Rinna stays in front of the camera, long after she goes behind it, as I'm sure she will. Congratulations, Alex & Rinna, for some really beautiful work:)
Friday, May 17th, 2013 on Rinna A
I thought the lighting from the lamp was a bit artsy-fartsy. But I loved the close-ups of her pussy. I DO, however, prefer it wet and sticky!!
Thursday, May 16th, 2013 on Centro
I agree with most of what you say - it is past-time for her to be taken out of the cotton-wool. But give me Tony Murano or Rylsky to get her butterfly open, active and smiling:)
Thursday, May 16th, 2013 on Nastya E
Possibly the most perfect breasts on the web:) And you guys certainly devoted your time and style to prove it. How about the same effort directed towards her pussy in future shoots with her......? Please:)
Thursday, May 16th, 2013 on Milana F
I would like to thank the the photographers who brought to our attention, Milana's beauty. Alex, Ivan, Luca and Tony - who remains my favorite KoP - "King of Pussy". One model, four photographers and 12 Different styles. Thank you ALL.
Thursday, May 16th, 2013 on Milana G
Have a look at Malvina in Errotica Archives. Flora's work there isn't in the same class as Mr A's, she looks apprehensive, even stunned, in most of the shots, but it is the same hair, same eyes and the same puffy nipples as Macy here. See if you agree.
Wednesday, May 15th, 2013 on Macy B
I KNOW I'm in luv!!
Macy would make any setting look great. She could sell wool sacks to a dairy farmer, she looks so good.
Mr. Arkisi seems to 'take a step up' when working with Macy. In all her 870 odd images in the 7 sets so far, she almost steps out of the screen. Though p-s does seem a bit heavy in this set. Her skin isn't as fine in this set as in the previous ones.
Wednesday, May 15th, 2013 on Scena
Set 3 Mr. Goncharov - 'GIRLS BEHAVING - BADLY'!!!! Unless these girls stipulate a preference for girls, they're going to look BLOODY STUPID, as these two do here. Unless you have a QUALIFIED, Lesbian Duet, leave Girls on Girls ALONE!!!! It NEVER looks real.
Wednesday, May 15th, 2013 on Primeiro
A by-line to the Moderators. I might as well re-new my sub to Playboy!! Those girls show just as much, are American, Blondes, Brunettes and Redheads, just like you have!! They come from 52 states, and your models don't come from 52 Countries.
My preference has always been for Met-Art and the European models because they have a far broader sexual awareness than their 'Western' counter-parts.
That said, I am seriously PISSED-OFF, when a model comes on-line, she cums On Line because she's excited, loves what she's doing and who she's dining it with, the file is blotted and closed. Anything further from that model is moribund. Dead. Lifeless, no expression or emotion. And THAT is what pisses me off about Met-Art.
During 2010, there didn't seem to be a problem with a model posing with a wet pussy. Jesus, I've even got one with a Tampon string tucked away!!!!
THAT said, the only thing that keeps me here are the NEW girls who have not been told yet to COOL IT!!!!
Rylsky might have opened his own site, but you've lost Tony Murano - the Prince of Pussy. EVERY model who worked with Tony (bar 1), had a rapport with him that was/is undeniable. Her emotions flowed. Her excitement was obvious and she loved what she was doing and where she was.
WHERE THE HELL IS TONY MURANO????
Wednesday, May 15th, 2013 on Lily C
Is it just me, or has anyone else noticed the down-turn in substance, not the quality of models, but the appearance of the sets? I have just down-loaded LEONARDO's last set dated 15/05/2013, and looking at the sets he has shot of LILLY C, he hasn't shot a 'close-up pussy' since 25/11/2011.
Has it anything to do with the draconian laws instituted by these puritanical mods of this site in the last 12 or so months?
I've noticed that Leonardo isn't the only on. Some of the biggest names have quit the same style. Who has seen anything of Tony Murano for 2012/13?
He is just one we have seemed to have lost. Rylsky has opened his own site, so he's obviously keeping his best for that, but who can afford $1000.00pa to look at what is Human Nature. Not this Little Black Duck, and that's for sure.
Met-Art has lost it's name Met (Metropolitan) and Art. It claims to be Soft-core porn, well that is B/S. It's become Soft-core Nothing.
Two years is a long time to wait for an update on this red-headed dynamo!!
Tuesday, May 14th, 2013 on Kirstie A
Congratulations to Alex & Katie on a truly erotic set of images:) The rapport between these two is fantastic. Here's to them getting back together soon.
Tuesday, May 14th, 2013 on Katie A
I don't believe what I'm seeing in this set, (and the next, Fresh, for that matter!!) What an absolute 'Pocket Rocket' this young woman is!! Her bravery and unbridled enthusiasm shown in all her shoots is remarkable!! WELL DONE, Erik and Firebird.
I'm sorry I ignored these sets when I first came across them last year. I regret not having down-loaded them sooner, almost as much as I regret there have been no updates. You can't honestly tell me Erik, that you're bored with her already!!
Please bring her back!! Let's see how daring she is in flimsy lingerie;) We know she fills a bra to perfection....let's see some more of that. Please?
Saturday, May 11th, 2013 on Frabuala
Great work from a Master Photographer and the stunningly beautiful Amelia. Thank you both for the beautiful, sensual art.
Saturday, May 11th, 2013 on Emilia A
Beautiful young woman. Perfect figure. EMILIE deserves more exposure.
Friday, May 10th, 2013 on Emilie A
This is the thing, Mr. Rylsky, some retard has F***ed M-A and E-A by censoring wet pussies. Has the same thing happened on your site? Coz if it has, it ain't worth the bucks to join it. If Wet Pussies are Welcome there, I'd unsubscribe quicker than a heart-beat from this insidious censorship at M-A & E-A. Your only peer for wet pussy is Tony M and even he has gone a bit weird, as have Leonardo and Goncharov. Cripes, G seems to have flagged this stupidity @ M-A completely, whilst L can't even do close-ups anymore. So what's the story at your place???? More of the same, or does realism and truth abound????
Thursday, May 9th, 2013 on Chloe D
C'MON Mr Rylsky, a Baby-doll on this Baby-Doll - just ONCE?? 6 months is long enough to have to hold my breath!!:)
Poor girl. Three sets and she can't get away from salt and sand!! Get the poor kid on dry land, away from water and into some soft and feminine lingerie - what a combination!! Give her a break from Salt, Sand & Sea for Land, Lingerie & Lust - just watch the transformation.
Thursday, May 9th, 2013 on Chloe B
The relevant facts to this set, I first (and last) down-loaded from W4B on 11/12/2010, a set that was originally shot in 2008. Probable thinking - a 5 year gap from its original posting and to a new site....... B/S!! Was and still is.
Thursday, May 9th, 2013 on Identigo
To each his own wood chuck. This set is no joke - it comes from W4B sometime in 2010, I think. It certainly is not the first time it's been aired.
I was only updating her tonight, at E-A first, and spat the dummy there over her Cortina sets with Antea, but what really brought that on was her latest (59 I think) images in her 2nd Guancieale set.
She has done NOTHING even remotely erotic there since set 7, the 2nd half of her Lambada series.
She's not the most over-rated model on site, that crown goes to Iveta B, followed by Jackie D, neither of whom were forth-coming. Chiara at least started with some relish, but has closed up shop over the last several sets.
Beauty most certainly is - In the Eye of the Beholder. For me, she starts looking good from the neck down. I don't think her face is remotely pretty.
You think so????? His last two sets with her didn't amass 120 images, and sh looked like a bloody robot in each of them!!!
You poor, lonely old soul:) But you're right about the traffic!! And all for this bint!! Sheeesh!!!!
That just happens to be the truth:)
Check-out her W4B shoots, about 2010, I think, exactly the same make-up, lighting and most of the poses too, I presume - haven't printed them to compare, but as near as damn-it to identical in all other respects.
And There In lies the problem!! She (Like Jenny Gregg), has decided her pussy is too precious for us out here. See Luca's last two sets of her!! Couldn't get 120 images all-up!! She's just another dumb broad, believing in her 'Press' too much.
She's not going into my 'Inactive Model' (models who haven't been updated since 2009), file, she's going into my recycle bin and I'll delete the silly twat from that too.
p.s. She did the same make-up for W4B some time back!!, in a series called 'Hots'. No pussy to speak of there, either!!
BRIANNA B is another badly neglected lady. She had a great rapport with TONY MURANO on the two occasions she worked with him. Where did she go??
Tuesday, May 7th, 2013 on Brianna B
How come there is only one set of this glamorous lady???? Perfectly proportioned, stunning features and an active pussy I'd be prepared to kill for. C'MON, you guys!!! Don't hang her out to dry!!
Tuesday, May 7th, 2013 on Breeze A
An emotionless robot.
Tuesday, May 7th, 2013 on Bony A
It's hard to believe we haven't seen this girl for two years. Could we get an update on BIJOU please?
Tuesday, May 7th, 2013 on Bijou A
It would be appreciated if Barbara had a more regular updating. A new set monthly would not be too many!!:)
Monday, May 6th, 2013 on Barbara D
Very beautiful, very expressive model. Love to see more of her work:)
Sunday, May 5th, 2013 on Alva A
ADELE's first set was dated May 6th, 2010. This month of May 2013 celebrates her 3rd anniversary of her work on Met-Art. I hope we get to celebrate more anniversaries with these two, and many more fabulous sets of their stunning erotica.
Saturday, May 4th, 2013 on Adele B
ADELE never fails to illuminate, entrance and excite with her perfect body, alluring expression and enthusiasm she puts into her work. TONY MURANO must take a certain amount of credit also, because without the trust ADELE obviously has in you, the rapport between the two of you just wouldn't exist. Thank you both, for your intoxicating images.
Another classic example of why Met-Art has the best Erotic models on the 'net. VIOLLA is stunningly beautiful, and Thank you MATISS, for showing her at her absolute erotic Best!:) Your next session together can't come soon enough.
Friday, May 3rd, 2013 on Violla A
Could we see you all again here on Met-Art SOON please?
Friday, May 3rd, 2013 on Vila A
Beautiful young woman, a seriously erotic model without pretensions. VILA has been superbly photographed by both BALIUS & MIKELE ESQUINZO. Thank you all, for sharing your exquisite work. Yes, VILA turns me on!!:)
Is there a good reason for SOFY's demise? Nothing from her since Feb 2011??
Wednesday, May 1st, 2013 on Sofy A
Unbelievable!! After her three remarkable sets in 2011, there has been nothing since!! The girl is sensational. Beautiful beyond imagination, and playful as well. Missing her BADLY.
Wednesday, May 1st, 2013 on Sanny A
It's very gratifying to see the great work originating with VORONIN, is continuing with LEONARDO. SABRINA, for all her incredible beauty, doesn't appear at all affected, and still seems to enjoy teasing the viewer:)
Wednesday, May 1st, 2013 on Sabrina D
In American Baseball terms, you two are batting 1000. I don't have a clue what that means, I play Rugby Union, Tennis, and swing a Golf club (badly) I assume to 'Bat 1000', you're doing pretty good. Having downloaded your work, Pretty Good is an understatement!! Yesterday would not be too soon for more of your work.
At 5' 8", 101lbs with a 33" bust, Rachel is but a slip of a girl - but a perfect 10/10 in my estimation. More Please, SOON:-)
Tuesday, April 30th, 2013 on Rachel Blau
Thank you Mr. Arkisi for presenting us with the Superlative Miss Rachel Blau. Thank YOU, Rachel for presenting yourself in all your glorious, feminine, uninhibited beauty. Top of the Charts to both of you for your commitment. (And I've only got two sets so far):)
I anyone with-holding any sets of this girl? I'd love to see more of her.
Tuesday, April 30th, 2013 on Rich A
Such a shame only one set of this gorgeous girl has appeared.
Monday, April 29th, 2013 on Polly C
I agree Bobblehat. But she's also cold, calculating, aloof, uninterested and completely unemotional. 42 sets, 6,153 images and she hasn't 'popped' once. No interest in the photographers Voronin and Leonardo, the people she's working with, her surroundings or the work on hand.
In defence of Olga, that could be a problem with the photographers. Neither shot close-ups, headshots or bust. And both like to get up-close and personal with their models. Both used long lenses, full length, full frame shots. And generally that's at the request of the model because of some defect or skin blemish. (I didn't notice any of either).
So after all that, the ball is back with Olga. She just doesn't want to get too involved with the shoots she attending. Probably why Voronin gave up after 33 sets.
Monday, April 29th, 2013 on Olga M
Mira is mind-numbingly beautiful. Her 1st set especially, where she's run free and unashamed of her indisputable sexuality. Of the 288 models I've collected from Met-Art, not to mention those collected from ITC, 21Sextury, W4B and others, this set is my absolute favorite. Tony Murano has been my Prince of Pussy in the past, but Higinio has shown here he's equal to TM.
Saturday, April 27th, 2013 on Mira D
It's long past time for new work from this beautiful woman. Stunning work in front of the camera, terrific interaction with Sergey. Just two fabulous sets though??:)
Saturday, April 27th, 2013 on Milka A
Milania is a Freedom Loving, uninhibited, natural young lady who likes to perform for the camera. And she did in Alex's first set. Then the retarded old grandma stamped her petulant little foot and said "No More!" What is her problem? She really does need to get a life!! Met-Art is rapidly becoming a General Exhibition, family oriented site where all nudity will soon be lost.
I really getting sick of the petulance of the mods here who are restricting what is allowable here. Your models for the most part are absolutely remarkable, enjoy their work, surroundings and the people they're working with. If they're that relaxed, and they get a bit excited, SO WHAT? I'm not interested in women pretending (badly) to be lesbians, and the only dick I want to see in a pussy is mine.
Let Met-Art do what it set out to do, bringing models and photographers together and having fun!!
Sorry I used this forum to express my opinions, but there is nowhere else!!
Saturday, April 27th, 2013 on Milania A
This model merits a lot more exposure than she's currently getting. It's almost 12 months since her last set!!
Friday, April 26th, 2013 on Michaela A
You have taken out the Daily Double, Mr. Arkisi. First with Macy and then with Marica - both models new to me. I prefer the firmer bust of Macy, with those exceptional eyes. Marica, though, let's her butterfly play around in the fresh air. So she's pretty bloody exceptional too:)
Thursday, April 25th, 2013 on Marica A
Macy is mind-numbingly Gorgeous. Gonna have to wear sunglasses when she finally releases her Butterfly:)100/10
Thursday, April 25th, 2013 on Macy B
Absolutely awesome work with LENNY, Ron. I'm not sure if she's in love with you or your camera:) Possibly both. There are certainly positive reactions from her, towards some very artistic from you. Please bring her back no delay please. LENNY is a beautiful woman, with an obvious passion for her work.
Thursday, April 25th, 2013 on Lenny A
Just 9 sets (& one vid) in 5 years?? 1½ sets per year doesn't do this woman justice. Two-sets-per-month would be a much more satisfactory occurrence. More of LUSI soon, please. I couldn't stand another year before seeing her perfect form again.
Wednesday, April 24th, 2013 on Lusi A
When is somebody going to do the decent thing and bring LOVINA back to Met-Art???? While I'd LOVE to chase her all over the M-A sites, time & money prevents this happening.
Wednesday, April 24th, 2013 on Lovina A
Absolute perfection in feminine beauty. Stunning, expressive eyes, cute nose, mouth-watering lips, perfect breasts. Thank you for introducing her Egon. LIZA is one of the most exciting models I've seen. I would not object to seeing more exposures devoted to her delectable pussy though:)) Sadly neglected so far.
Monday, April 22nd, 2013 on Liza J
Would someone please wake-up Tony Murano to this young, beautiful model. LIVIA needs his immediate attention:)
Monday, April 22nd, 2013 on Livia A
Lastly, MET-ART, a problem I thought was mine, and went BALLISTIC, trying to find the error.
Years back, I selected a model by looks, (still do, mostly), LILLY A was one I picked on 25/02/2011.
Over the last several months, I've been updating my models here, adding dates and photographers that previously showed set number and sometimes date.
LILLY A, here at Met-Art, was a problem. HUGE. I had 26 sets of images and 12 videos on my Hard Drive - total 38. (count 26 + 12 = 38) My problem WAS, you only have THIRTY-SEVEN (37) on site.
I went backwards and forwards for 2½ hours, before I found the problem. I was spitting sparks, livid with anger, and ready to commit mayhem, when, after going through your list and mine, YOU have deleted one set. Number 14, 'PADRONA'!! Why? Why upset your subscribers with inane, childish Bull Shit like this?? But perhaps there is a legitimate reason? It certainly has nothing to do with law, unless the owners of the dog are complaining?? The dog bloody well enjoyed himself. (As would anyone in LILLY's company):) So why is PADRONA missing from your list??
Sunday, April 21st, 2013 on Lilly A
And a further problem with Met-Art.
I was updating my LILLY A files earlier, today, 'Modello' was my last addition to E-A, and I wrote requesting more. By scrolling up the page, I found more and had to apologise. After down-loading 1 vid and 3 sets, I came back to Met-Art. There I found my last down-load was 'Sinivali" by ERRO, of course, and just wanted to say, "I hope this is NOT the last we've seen of LILLY A.
My reasons were listed in my previous post - there is none better, and she has few peers, when it comes to showing her approval at becoming alive and aroused with her shoot.
DON'T destroy the lady by denying nature. That would really SHIT me!!
I hope we have not seen the last of LILLY A. Blonde, Beautiful & Brilliant - well bloody intelligent anyway, if not brilliant. In her intelligence lays her sexiness. Take into account the different expressions her eyes portray, the different set of her sensuous mouth, and with the right photographer & perhaps the setting, her exciting, voluptuous desire-filled vagina. (See Erro's 'Prelude, Demand here, and Pianino in Errotica Archives, LILLY A is one of the most exciting women available.
Two things I'd like to see happen at Met-Art, as a subscriber, that the idiot bloody Old Grandma who has decided a woman can't be photographed 'wet', should allow women to be themselves, let 'Nature' take its course, demand that tissue should be kept only for perspiration affecting make-up. For some ungodly reason, it has been decided that a woman can no longer be seen to be aroused. What Bloody Idiocy Is THAT??
I tossed PiER999 for the very simple reason, even their pornstars were depicted with pussies drier than the Simpson Desert!!!! Unfortunately, this site seems to heading in the same direction.
I'd hate to lose it because I've collected almost 2TB of Met-Art & E-A models. All my favorites are here. But I want the girls to be allowed to be themselves.
LILLY looks absolutely fabulous in intimate, sexy lingerie!!:) More Please:)
Sunday, April 21st, 2013 on Virginia
Congratulations Ratmer, on your portrayal of the very beautiful LADA:) It is important for me to see a model relaxed in her surroundings and who lets nature take it's course during the session. You captured her "essence" as few others have. Thanks.
Sunday, April 21st, 2013 on Cidical
I have just spent 3 very pleasurable hours playing with KASSANDRA'S most beautiful breasts, cropping and editing. I am by no means a booby bloke, I prefer to spreading legs and playing with pussy. I am though, in awe of the magnificence of KASSANDRA'S perfect bust, so beautifully portrayed by LEONARDO.
I hope though, that the next shoot she does, (it's almost 3 years since her last), that more emphasis will be placed on her "Golden Honey Pot:)
Saturday, April 20th, 2013 on Presenting Kassandra
Well Michael, I totally agree with your sentiments. I'm cleaning up my HD of Inactive Met Models, but don't have the heart to remove this beauty from my Active list. I hope Tony Murano, Leonardo, Goncharov or Voronin who has worked with her, put her back in the spot light!! Rylsky would do, if he shot her solo, even Luca Helios on a good day, would do her justice.
Thursday, April 18th, 2013 on Katya AD
It is Criminal Negligence, that no photographer has worked with this Angel for 6 years!!:( KATYA is Perfection Personified from the soles of her dainty feet to her luxurious blonde hair.
She is barely 24, would be even more beautiful (if that's possible), than she is portrayed here in these sets. Would someone please try tore-invent KATYA AD. Too many images of this beauty is never going to happen:)
OK, so I can't count. Nothing new, so Julia is nearer 30, maybe. I could gaze for hours in awe and wonder at the growing beauty of this 30-year-old:)) Julia would be the perfect companion in an isolated hideaway. Eyes to drown in, breasts for life-support and perfect pussy for sustenance.
Wednesday, April 17th, 2013 on Julia I
This lady has been idle way too long:( Time someone reinvented her!! 28 sets and 3 videos do not do JULIA I justice. I know her career spans 6 gorgeous years, but if she Started at aged 22, she's only 28 now, and women are like fine wine. Just get more tasty and beautiful;)
IVETTA is a beautiful young lady who needs to be treated like a princess, not just a model who will take her clothes off. Someone like Tony Murano would take the fact that she's hot and aroused, and not ashamed to show it, and turn a good shoot into an exceptional one. Dolce had the world at his fingertips, but missed the bus unfortunately. While focusing on her face and figure, which are exceptional, he missed the fact she was hot and horny and he didn't emphasize that anywhere. I hope these sets aren't all she does, because the Lady is a heart-breaker. No sweat!!:) Thanks, Ivetta, for your time and pics. Thanks, Dolce, for submitting them:)
Tuesday, April 16th, 2013 on Ivetta A
IZOLDA is Perfection Personified. Sexually alluring. Sophisticated 'Girl Next Door' appearance, with killer looks. She is the creation of Sexual Fantasy on legs.
All she needs is someone to get up close and personal to give her the freedom to really let her physical excitement show just how desirable she truly is.
Let's hope her next set is soon to be arriving!! It might even be called 'IZOLDA Honestly'. ;)
Saturday, April 6th, 2013 on Evaluiert
It's 3 years this models' last set. That's 3 years toooooooo long. Would someone, Preferably Mr. Tony Murano (you're the Master at arousal).
Friday, April 5th, 2013 on Indira A
What's with this girl? She has been modelling for almost 4 years and keeps her pussy hidden like a protected species in a forestation that would defy Indiana Jones!! I know there are those who like to see a hairy pussy, but how can you like something you can't see?? I have a very difficult decision to make. Do I keep her on my hard drive for her face and figure, or cull her to the recycle bin because her pussy has been a non-event in 7 sets of image photography??
Thursday, April 4th, 2013 on Hunter A
Gorgeous. Stunning and Glamourous. Unfortunately, under-rated by photographers, as shown by her dearth of sets. Deserving of much more attention than she is getting.
Saturday, March 30th, 2013 on Alisa G
It took me two years, 10 months to find this model, and there is just the one set of her. For exuding pure sex on legs, this woman has few peers. Leonardo, MORE PLEASE:)
Friday, March 29th, 2013 on Gabriella A