This is probably one of the hottest sets I've seen in a while on here. Very erotic, nice close-ups, and you can tell the model is into pleasuring herself. Keep up the good work.
I'm sorry, but I actually like it...because it's different...has that whole primitive /tribal thing going on. The only thing that could have made it better is if they both started going at it.
Sorry, but I'm not looking at the "flash in her eyes, the color of the wallpaper, or what the weather is doing outside"...I'm looking at her nice, perfect ass while she's bending over. It's a great set because of her poses and the fact the pictures aren't blurry.
Sorry, but I've just never really understood all the fawning over her. I mean she's okay...but not "the hottest model that's ever walked the face of the earth" like most make her out to be.
Man, I really don't get what all the whining and sniveling is about. So a model doesn't get completely naked, and chooses to express herself through dance. Big freaken deal. It's not the end of the friggan world. There are billions of sets on MET.
I personally find it refreshing to see a lovely young women, with obvious dance skills and athletic ability, sharing her body and demonstrating her moves. I'll even go so far as to call it...sexy.
I have to agree that she'd look better with a few more pounds added to her nice curvy frame. When she was younger and first started out on Hegre-Art she wasn't rail thin, and she looked super-hot.
I'll expand on it. The reason why it's sad is because it's degrading. Sure Caprice looks sweet and innocent in this set, but how does she look in her other sets where 25 dudes are pulling an anal train on her and using her mouth as a high-volume sperm receptacle?
But hey, some people consider humiliation, degradation and depravity to be "art"...right?
Judging by the reaction, you'd think the photographer had just murdered every poster's mother on here in cold blood with an AR. Wow, take a deep breath and calm down...last time I checked, there's like a billion photosets on MET. By the way, I'm proud to be the only person (clearly in the entire universe) who happens to like this set, and the model.
This is obviously an up-skirt tease set (which was very nicely done) and was clearly lost on 97% of the viewers...who are probably too young to know anything about up skirt tease sets. Bravo.
I think a lot of these photogs and editors are either gay, terrified of women, or they used to be fashion photographers. Those are about the only reasons why you would not want to get close up to these beautiful women.
A lot of these photographers and editors are probably gay. Who else could be around all these super-hot women all day long and not go crazy? The problem is all these gay photographers have no idea what turns on a heterosexual man. That's the only logical explanation that explains why most of these beautiful women are posed the lame way they are with most of their clothes on.
Thank you! Yes, you're correct about the decapitations and hacking off body parts with the camera.
Straight on (no tilted camera) full-length (not hacked off at the knee or head) whole body shots, taken with a high-res camera (well lit with and no blur) is where it's at! If this site, or any other, could do that more often, they'd have me as a daily member for life instead of a few times a year.
There's no way in hell this is a new and current set. It's gotta be an old archive set from the 1990's they accidentally slipped into the mix. No modern-day 30+ megapixel camera owner in their right mind would purposefully go out of their way to create pictures this pixelated, blurry and ugly.
14 Megapixels, really? The camera on my iPhone can take better pictures than these. Seriously. I guess we better pass the hat around and take up a collection so all these dead-broke photogs can go out and buy some better cameras.
I don't mind water in a set (bath. pool. spray, whatever) because a wet hard body is very sexy...**just so long as every single picture doesn't have water COVERING UP up her whole body. A lot of times water (and soap) can be used as a PROP (like clothes) for the model to not have to reveal all.
If that was truly the case, then it's a simple fix. Make a "Raw" uncompressed zip file available for those who are interested in spending the time to download it. Personally, I think many of these photographers are just using cheap equipment. Go look at some of Leonardo's work. The image quality in most of his sets is super-clear and crisp and the file sizes aren't much bigger.
If this was the year 2000, I could understand this problem, but it's the year 2013. High resolution cameras are cheap, bandwidth is cheap, storage space is cheap, etc. From a technology standpoint, there's really no valid excuse for it.
Corny tats and tramp-stamps, especially lettered ones (probably some guy's name) that require extensive Photoshopping are an instant turn-off for me, no matter how hot the model is. I just can't get past them.
It's like spending $300,000 on a brand new Ferrari, and then spray-painting it with a can of $2 paint to “try and make it look better.” Sane people don't do things like that, but who knows, maybe somebody forced her to get it.
I like the model, I like the poses, but the image quality can use some work. Sorry, but the camera on my cheap smart phone can take clearer and sharper images than these, especially from a distance.
I hope Semmi stays around for awhile. Since my whole world doesn't revolve around pubic hair...I really couldn't care less if she shaves or not. I feel lucky just to be able to see her nude on here.
A very beautiful woman....and, I think she would 'also' look hot if she stopped shaving for awhile...and yes, I'm an American who happens to like fur. Shocking, I know.
I have to agree. The green 2-tone stripped couch doesn't add anything, in fact, it distracts from the model. She would have looked way better in a studio with just a solid color background behind her with a simple chair or bench to sit on.
Hey Sparky, this is obviously some guy's wife we're talking about. Sure, he may be cool with what she's doing, or he may not be, but that doesn't mean every guy in the whole wide world is going to be cool with the idea of fantasizing about somebody's wife. That's why photographers have models remove their wedding rings. Think about it.
The most common answers I hear from women as to "why they got tats" is generally along the lines of "because it's cool" and "all my friends have them". I think in most cases they do it because of social pressure rather than some "personal thing"...especially when the tat is some non-unique tribal arm band / tramp stamp, insect, or flower that everyone else has.
I agree and disagree. Huge tats on hot women do not make them look hotter. But what looks worse is when an amateur Photoshop artist tries to remove them (the way they tried in her sets). It's good that whoever was trying to Photoshop her tats finally stopped trying.
Wow, I guess I must be a "bad man" because I really like this set, and I'm a "bad man" for saying that she looks really hot, and that she appears to be enjoying herself in spite of what all you "good people" think. Okay, the "bad man" is now leaving the board. Say goodbye to the "bad man".
It's all subjective and in the eye of the beholder.
I personally like Leonardo's work, and don't like the way Murano photographs women. Rylsky's work...I can take it or leave it. As far as what his models "reveal" on his site, it's not much different than Met, but as far as his volume of content, it's a tiny fraction of what Met has. He has more studio shots (which I happen to like) because the focus is completely on the model and not on some giant "movie set back drop" or "postcard travel location" you see on Met and other sites. I'm here to look at beautiful women...not sand, or flowers, or trees, or furniture, or little bunny rabbits.
I do hear what you're saying though about the wave of "puritanicalism" that seems to be running rampant throughout many of the nude-art websites. I'm not sure who is responsible for that but it's actually been happening for about the last decade. The was a time when any shot, from any angle, near, or far was not considered "taboo." I think Met-Art is trying (or tried) to break out of it with "Sex-Art"...but that's a whole different discussion. I don't think studio models do well in a hardcore porn situation, and vice versa. Then again, I'm only one of thousands who only paid $15 to be here...so how much does my opinion really count?
I hope Semmi stays around for awhile. Since my whole world doesn't revolve around pubic hair...I really couldn't care less if she shaves or not. I feel lucky just to be able to see her nude on here.
I like the model, I like the poses, but the image quality can use some work. Sorry, but the camera on my cheap smart phone can take clearer and sharper images than these, especially from a distance.
A very beautiful woman....and, I think she would 'also' look hot if she stopped shaving for awhile...and yes, I'm an American who happens to like fur. Shocking, I know.
I agree and disagree. Huge tats on hot women do not make them look hotter. But what looks worse is when an amateur Photoshop artist tries to remove them (the way they tried in her sets). It's good that whoever was trying to Photoshop her tats finally stopped trying.
I'm sorry, but I actually like it...because it's different...has that whole primitive /tribal thing going on. The only thing that could have made it better is if they both started going at it.
Sorry, but I'm not looking at the "flash in her eyes, the color of the wallpaper, or what the weather is doing outside"...I'm looking at her nice, perfect ass while she's bending over. It's a great set because of her poses and the fact the pictures aren't blurry.
If that was truly the case, then it's a simple fix. Make a "Raw" uncompressed zip file available for those who are interested in spending the time to download it. Personally, I think many of these photographers are just using cheap equipment. Go look at some of Leonardo's work. The image quality in most of his sets is super-clear and crisp and the file sizes aren't much bigger.
If this was the year 2000, I could understand this problem, but it's the year 2013. High resolution cameras are cheap, bandwidth is cheap, storage space is cheap, etc. From a technology standpoint, there's really no valid excuse for it.
Wow, I guess I must be a "bad man" because I really like this set, and I'm a "bad man" for saying that she looks really hot, and that she appears to be enjoying herself in spite of what all you "good people" think. Okay, the "bad man" is now leaving the board. Say goodbye to the "bad man".
Corny tats and tramp-stamps, especially lettered ones (probably some guy's name) that require extensive Photoshopping are an instant turn-off for me, no matter how hot the model is. I just can't get past them.
It's like spending $300,000 on a brand new Ferrari, and then spray-painting it with a can of $2 paint to “try and make it look better.” Sane people don't do things like that, but who knows, maybe somebody forced her to get it.
It's all subjective and in the eye of the beholder.
I personally like Leonardo's work, and don't like the way Murano photographs women. Rylsky's work...I can take it or leave it. As far as what his models "reveal" on his site, it's not much different than Met, but as far as his volume of content, it's a tiny fraction of what Met has. He has more studio shots (which I happen to like) because the focus is completely on the model and not on some giant "movie set back drop" or "postcard travel location" you see on Met and other sites. I'm here to look at beautiful women...not sand, or flowers, or trees, or furniture, or little bunny rabbits.
I do hear what you're saying though about the wave of "puritanicalism" that seems to be running rampant throughout many of the nude-art websites. I'm not sure who is responsible for that but it's actually been happening for about the last decade. The was a time when any shot, from any angle, near, or far was not considered "taboo." I think Met-Art is trying (or tried) to break out of it with "Sex-Art"...but that's a whole different discussion. I don't think studio models do well in a hardcore porn situation, and vice versa. Then again, I'm only one of thousands who only paid $15 to be here...so how much does my opinion really count?
This is probably one of the hottest sets I've seen in a while on here. Very erotic, nice close-ups, and you can tell the model is into pleasuring herself. Keep up the good work.
Man, I really don't get what all the whining and sniveling is about. So a model doesn't get completely naked, and chooses to express herself through dance. Big freaken deal. It's not the end of the friggan world. There are billions of sets on MET.
I personally find it refreshing to see a lovely young women, with obvious dance skills and athletic ability, sharing her body and demonstrating her moves. I'll even go so far as to call it...sexy.
I'll expand on it. The reason why it's sad is because it's degrading. Sure Caprice looks sweet and innocent in this set, but how does she look in her other sets where 25 dudes are pulling an anal train on her and using her mouth as a high-volume sperm receptacle?
But hey, some people consider humiliation, degradation and depravity to be "art"...right?
A lot of these photographers and editors are probably gay. Who else could be around all these super-hot women all day long and not go crazy? The problem is all these gay photographers have no idea what turns on a heterosexual man. That's the only logical explanation that explains why most of these beautiful women are posed the lame way they are with most of their clothes on.
I don't mind water in a set (bath. pool. spray, whatever) because a wet hard body is very sexy...**just so long as every single picture doesn't have water COVERING UP up her whole body. A lot of times water (and soap) can be used as a PROP (like clothes) for the model to not have to reveal all.
Sorry, but I've just never really understood all the fawning over her. I mean she's okay...but not "the hottest model that's ever walked the face of the earth" like most make her out to be.
I have to agree that she'd look better with a few more pounds added to her nice curvy frame. When she was younger and first started out on Hegre-Art she wasn't rail thin, and she looked super-hot.
Judging by the reaction, you'd think the photographer had just murdered every poster's mother on here in cold blood with an AR. Wow, take a deep breath and calm down...last time I checked, there's like a billion photosets on MET. By the way, I'm proud to be the only person (clearly in the entire universe) who happens to like this set, and the model.
This is obviously an up-skirt tease set (which was very nicely done) and was clearly lost on 97% of the viewers...who are probably too young to know anything about up skirt tease sets. Bravo.
I think a lot of these photogs and editors are either gay, terrified of women, or they used to be fashion photographers. Those are about the only reasons why you would not want to get close up to these beautiful women.
Thank you! Yes, you're correct about the decapitations and hacking off body parts with the camera.
Straight on (no tilted camera) full-length (not hacked off at the knee or head) whole body shots, taken with a high-res camera (well lit with and no blur) is where it's at! If this site, or any other, could do that more often, they'd have me as a daily member for life instead of a few times a year.
There's no way in hell this is a new and current set. It's gotta be an old archive set from the 1990's they accidentally slipped into the mix. No modern-day 30+ megapixel camera owner in their right mind would purposefully go out of their way to create pictures this pixelated, blurry and ugly.
14 Megapixels, really? The camera on my iPhone can take better pictures than these. Seriously. I guess we better pass the hat around and take up a collection so all these dead-broke photogs can go out and buy some better cameras.
I have to agree. The green 2-tone stripped couch doesn't add anything, in fact, it distracts from the model. She would have looked way better in a studio with just a solid color background behind her with a simple chair or bench to sit on.
Hey Sparky, this is obviously some guy's wife we're talking about. Sure, he may be cool with what she's doing, or he may not be, but that doesn't mean every guy in the whole wide world is going to be cool with the idea of fantasizing about somebody's wife. That's why photographers have models remove their wedding rings. Think about it.
The most common answers I hear from women as to "why they got tats" is generally along the lines of "because it's cool" and "all my friends have them". I think in most cases they do it because of social pressure rather than some "personal thing"...especially when the tat is some non-unique tribal arm band / tramp stamp, insect, or flower that everyone else has.
Maybe it was done in her "wilder" days - although as young as she's reported, it's hard to believe she's had many of those. Maybe it was done on a whim, but it looks like it's some sort of stylized religious motif - possibly a rosary - and that may lead to a religious/family connection.
I swear I've seen this bed and maybe even the room that it's in from another source on the web, as more a photo of the bed itself. And I don't think it was from Met-Art or any nude site. Didn't have a model. In fact I think it was a FB link that was showing worlds most creative furniture.
It's funny how people have so much different opinions and tastes. :)
I'm totally the opposite of you: I prefer much more outdoor sets rather than studio sets. My preference is, from bigger to least: outdoors > indoors with a background (like in a bedroom, living room, etc.) > studio with a plain background.
I find studio sets so boring, savorless and without creativity (I do like some though; it also depends on the model, the poses, the beauty of the set, the effort putted into it, and other factors). I do not want to see only the model, like you, I want to see the model in a place where I can put my imagination to work. It's hard to fantasize in a fake environment (regarding studio sets); it's much more easy to fantasize you and the model when it's in a real place. Also I like to see beautiful places and landscapes.
The ideal photo session for me is like the "Albus" set with Nikia A I mentioned before: the model starts with clothes on in a public place, than makes some shots half naked outdoors and than go indoors and finish the set. Perfect! It could also have finished outdoors, no problem; but the three different places created a kind of story, with start, middle, and ending. The perfect set for me has to tell a story, like that one; it has to have a start, a middle, and an ending. Studio sets for me has only the middle (if the model starts already naked; like in many of Rylsky's sets); it's better, though, if she starts with clothes on and finish it totally naked, like in Antonio Clemens' studio sets. Than it's "start and middle" at least, not only "middle". :P
If you only paid $15 to be here then we in Australia are subsidising your subscription and I'm pretty well pissed off about that I can tell you! I've been thinking about cancelling when my subscription is due for renewal anyway, haven't been getting email notifications that my favourites are on for several months and didn't even get a response when I emailed Sex-Art to let them know my account had possibly been hacked and someone named "Ardent Fan" had been posting on my account. Not happy to say the least. Then Lilly comes along and makes it all worthwhile....
Alina is too beautiful to not continue modeling. Such a natural beauty is hard too see go. I love her hairy bush, and wouldn't mind to see a little armpit hair on her either.
This seems to be a common problem on Met-Art these days (and with others in the network) and I don't believe it is just a matter of the photographer or his technical expertise. I was just looking at some pics from my 2007 Met-Art library that were very much crisper and clearer. I have always downloaded in "Medium". Changing up to "High" on a few different sets recently makes no great difference. Has the expansion of the network diluted the quality?
Sean's Comments
Sean 4 years ago
This is probably one of the hottest sets I've seen in a while on here. Very erotic, nice close-ups, and you can tell the model is into pleasuring herself. Keep up the good work.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Nagna
Sean 4 years ago
Nice posing.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Dontosia
Sean 4 years ago
I'm sorry, but I actually like it...because it's different...has that whole primitive /tribal thing going on. The only thing that could have made it better is if they both started going at it.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Pyyar
Sean 4 years ago
Sorry, but I'm not looking at the "flash in her eyes, the color of the wallpaper, or what the weather is doing outside"...I'm looking at her nice, perfect ass while she's bending over. It's a great set because of her poses and the fact the pictures aren't blurry.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Grenier
Sean 4 years ago
Agree. Anyone could have taken better pictures of her with an iPhone.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Ruzanna A
Sean 4 years ago
Sorry, but I've just never really understood all the fawning over her. I mean she's okay...but not "the hottest model that's ever walked the face of the earth" like most make her out to be.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Nemel
Sean 4 years ago
Man, I really don't get what all the whining and sniveling is about. So a model doesn't get completely naked, and chooses to express herself through dance. Big freaken deal. It's not the end of the friggan world. There are billions of sets on MET.
I personally find it refreshing to see a lovely young women, with obvious dance skills and athletic ability, sharing her body and demonstrating her moves. I'll even go so far as to call it...sexy.
Sunday, November 3rd, 2013 on Ciseaux
Sean 4 years ago
I have to agree that she'd look better with a few more pounds added to her nice curvy frame. When she was younger and first started out on Hegre-Art she wasn't rail thin, and she looked super-hot.
Saturday, November 2nd, 2013 on Demanda
Sean 4 years ago
I have to agree. What's with the spray-painted white bike? Are we suppose to envision her riding around on that thing in real life? Yeah right.
Saturday, November 2nd, 2013 on Quartiere
Sean 4 years ago
I'll expand on it. The reason why it's sad is because it's degrading. Sure Caprice looks sweet and innocent in this set, but how does she look in her other sets where 25 dudes are pulling an anal train on her and using her mouth as a high-volume sperm receptacle?
But hey, some people consider humiliation, degradation and depravity to be "art"...right?
Saturday, November 2nd, 2013 on Konfido
Sean 4 years ago
Judging by the reaction, you'd think the photographer had just murdered every poster's mother on here in cold blood with an AR. Wow, take a deep breath and calm down...last time I checked, there's like a billion photosets on MET. By the way, I'm proud to be the only person (clearly in the entire universe) who happens to like this set, and the model.
Saturday, November 2nd, 2013 on Presenting Bagira
Sean 4 years ago
This is obviously an up-skirt tease set (which was very nicely done) and was clearly lost on 97% of the viewers...who are probably too young to know anything about up skirt tease sets. Bravo.
Saturday, November 2nd, 2013 on Matrame
Sean 4 years ago
Really?...so is that new rule?...sets with clear, crisp, sharp images are considered porn sets??
Monday, October 28th, 2013 on Silenzio
Sean 4 years ago
Super-hot girl in a set that looks like it was shot with a Polaroid Insta-matic camera from the 1970's.
Monday, October 28th, 2013 on Silenzio
Sean 4 years ago
Sweet beautiful girl.
Monday, October 28th, 2013 on Phileia
Sean 4 years ago
I think a lot of these photogs and editors are either gay, terrified of women, or they used to be fashion photographers. Those are about the only reasons why you would not want to get close up to these beautiful women.
Saturday, October 12th, 2013 on Essendo
Sean 4 years ago
We need more hot Asian women on this site.
Wednesday, October 9th, 2013 on Pramila
Sean 4 years ago
She made it up.
It's not her real name.
Wednesday, October 9th, 2013 on Jeff Milton
Sean 4 years ago
I agree, she needs to be in films.
Saturday, September 7th, 2013 on Oliwia A
Sean 4 years ago
You gotta love a woman that will bend over and show you her butt with a big smile on her face.
Saturday, September 7th, 2013 on Biscoto
Sean 4 years ago
Hopefully this one will hang around for awhile.
Thursday, September 5th, 2013 on Irish A
Sean 4 years ago
Very erotic. It's nice to see more explicit photos from Catherine.
Thursday, September 5th, 2013 on Absolvo
Sean 4 years ago
Kudos to all the Photoshop artists who have worked hard on Marina!
Tuesday, September 3rd, 2013 on Marina H
Sean 4 years ago
A lot of these photographers and editors are probably gay. Who else could be around all these super-hot women all day long and not go crazy? The problem is all these gay photographers have no idea what turns on a heterosexual man. That's the only logical explanation that explains why most of these beautiful women are posed the lame way they are with most of their clothes on.
Monday, August 19th, 2013 on Katya D
Sean 4 years ago
Thank you! Yes, you're correct about the decapitations and hacking off body parts with the camera.
Straight on (no tilted camera) full-length (not hacked off at the knee or head) whole body shots, taken with a high-res camera (well lit with and no blur) is where it's at! If this site, or any other, could do that more often, they'd have me as a daily member for life instead of a few times a year.
Sunday, August 18th, 2013 on Efectos
Sean 4 years ago
There's no way in hell this is a new and current set. It's gotta be an old archive set from the 1990's they accidentally slipped into the mix. No modern-day 30+ megapixel camera owner in their right mind would purposefully go out of their way to create pictures this pixelated, blurry and ugly.
Saturday, August 17th, 2013 on Presenting Leonda
Sean 4 years ago
The style is called: "I'm using the same old 5-mega pixel camera I bought back in 1998 when Met started"
Saturday, August 17th, 2013 on Presenting Leonda
Sean 4 years ago
Like the sexy outfit.
Friday, August 16th, 2013 on Lucky 8
Sean 4 years ago
14 Megapixels, really? The camera on my iPhone can take better pictures than these. Seriously. I guess we better pass the hat around and take up a collection so all these dead-broke photogs can go out and buy some better cameras.
Friday, August 16th, 2013 on Elefina
Sean 4 years ago
Maya is a total goddess.
It's tragic there weren't more sets of her.
Saturday, July 27th, 2013 on Maya C
Sean 4 years ago
A uniquely beautiful body.
Saturday, July 27th, 2013 on Loreen A
Sean 4 years ago
I don't mind water in a set (bath. pool. spray, whatever) because a wet hard body is very sexy...**just so long as every single picture doesn't have water COVERING UP up her whole body. A lot of times water (and soap) can be used as a PROP (like clothes) for the model to not have to reveal all.
Saturday, July 20th, 2013 on Meelitus
Sean 4 years ago
Uma is super sexy and has an incredible body.
It's good to have her back!
Saturday, July 20th, 2013 on Uma A
Sean 4 years ago
Very sexy set. I like the sheer dress and how it hits her legs right above the thigh.
Wednesday, July 17th, 2013 on Omorfia
Sean 4 years ago
Perfect 10.
End of story.
Wednesday, July 17th, 2013 on Nichole A
Sean 4 years ago
If that was truly the case, then it's a simple fix. Make a "Raw" uncompressed zip file available for those who are interested in spending the time to download it. Personally, I think many of these photographers are just using cheap equipment. Go look at some of Leonardo's work. The image quality in most of his sets is super-clear and crisp and the file sizes aren't much bigger.
If this was the year 2000, I could understand this problem, but it's the year 2013. High resolution cameras are cheap, bandwidth is cheap, storage space is cheap, etc. From a technology standpoint, there's really no valid excuse for it.
Friday, July 12th, 2013 on Presenting Agata
Sean 4 years ago
Corny tats and tramp-stamps, especially lettered ones (probably some guy's name) that require extensive Photoshopping are an instant turn-off for me, no matter how hot the model is. I just can't get past them.
It's like spending $300,000 on a brand new Ferrari, and then spray-painting it with a can of $2 paint to “try and make it look better.” Sane people don't do things like that, but who knows, maybe somebody forced her to get it.
Thursday, July 11th, 2013 on Helen H
Sean 4 years ago
I like the model, I like the poses, but the image quality can use some work. Sorry, but the camera on my cheap smart phone can take clearer and sharper images than these, especially from a distance.
Thursday, July 11th, 2013 on Presenting Agata
Sean 4 years ago
Sweet beautiful girl.
Friday, July 5th, 2013 on Liv A
Sean 4 years ago
Interesting how nobody agrees with you.
Thursday, July 4th, 2013 on Seyir
Sean 4 years ago
A very beautiful model.
I hope she stays around awhile.
Thursday, July 4th, 2013 on Angelique A
Sean 4 years ago
Alina....come back!
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013 on Alina H
Sean 4 years ago
Shy?...after 10 years of posing nude? Are you high?
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013 on Esquivo
Sean 4 years ago
First model that I fell in love with on Met...and even today I'd still drink her bathwater.
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013 on Jenya D
Sean 4 years ago
Goddess.
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013 on Anna AJ
Sean 4 years ago
It would be nice to see someone other than Erro take some shots of the beautiful Altea.
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013 on Altea B
Sean 4 years ago
An extremely beautiful model but many of her sets are sort of boring and repetitive.
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013 on Barbara D
Sean 4 years ago
Wow...
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013 on Web
Sean 4 years ago
Michelle is super beautiful.
I hope she stays around awhile.
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013 on Michelle H
Sean 4 years ago
I hope Semmi stays around for awhile. Since my whole world doesn't revolve around pubic hair...I really couldn't care less if she shaves or not. I feel lucky just to be able to see her nude on here.
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013 on Semmi A
Sean 4 years ago
Sounds like it's time for your shrink to up your lithium dose.
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013 on Sciroppo
Sean 4 years ago
Wow, what a super-hot babe.
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013 on Kloe Kane
Sean 4 years ago
Really hot girl, but a better photographer needs to be shooting her.
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013 on Brigitte D
Sean 4 years ago
Hope to see more of this beautiful model.
Saturday, June 29th, 2013 on Toxic A
Sean 4 years ago
She's got it all.
Friday, June 28th, 2013 on Valeria A
Sean 4 years ago
Hope to see more of Salma.
Wednesday, June 26th, 2013 on Salma C
Sean 4 years ago
Wow.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Amaca
Sean 4 years ago
Sexy girl, weak set. Way too short.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Agglia
Sean 4 years ago
One of my all-time favorites.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Rebecca C
Sean 4 years ago
A very beautiful woman....and, I think she would 'also' look hot if she stopped shaving for awhile...and yes, I'm an American who happens to like fur. Shocking, I know.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Patsy A
Sean 4 years ago
We need more studio sets of this elegant beauty like this one.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Snerta
Sean 4 years ago
I have to agree. The green 2-tone stripped couch doesn't add anything, in fact, it distracts from the model. She would have looked way better in a studio with just a solid color background behind her with a simple chair or bench to sit on.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Geruza
Sean 4 years ago
Hey Sherlock, look at the 108th picture from her first set.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Zhanna B
Sean 4 years ago
Hey Sparky, this is obviously some guy's wife we're talking about. Sure, he may be cool with what she's doing, or he may not be, but that doesn't mean every guy in the whole wide world is going to be cool with the idea of fantasizing about somebody's wife. That's why photographers have models remove their wedding rings. Think about it.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Chiamare
Sean 4 years ago
The most common answers I hear from women as to "why they got tats" is generally along the lines of "because it's cool" and "all my friends have them". I think in most cases they do it because of social pressure rather than some "personal thing"...especially when the tat is some non-unique tribal arm band / tramp stamp, insect, or flower that everyone else has.
Sunday, June 23rd, 2013 on Anasazi
Sean 4 years ago
I agree and disagree. Huge tats on hot women do not make them look hotter. But what looks worse is when an amateur Photoshop artist tries to remove them (the way they tried in her sets). It's good that whoever was trying to Photoshop her tats finally stopped trying.
Sunday, June 23rd, 2013 on Malena Morgan
Sean 4 years ago
Don't understand the low ratings for this little beauty.
It's gotta be the way she's being posed in her sets.
Saturday, June 22nd, 2013 on Conocido
Sean 4 years ago
Cool bed.
Saturday, June 22nd, 2013 on Palladis
Sean 4 years ago
Agree. I'm glad skin-tight jeans for woman finally made a comeback.
Saturday, June 22nd, 2013 on Pompau
Sean 4 years ago
All I can say is thank god for the "hide comments" button.
Monday, June 17th, 2013 on Caprice A
Sean 4 years ago
Super beautiful model and I like the poses.
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Orea
Sean 4 years ago
Have to agree. Very sexy, super sweet looking babe I hope we see more of.
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Leona E
Sean 4 years ago
Whatever you're smoking...I want some.
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Syrtis
Sean 4 years ago
Great set. Would have liked to see a bit more of that catsuit before she peeled it off.
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Calligraphie
Sean 4 years ago
Wow, why are you here?
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Profora
Sean 4 years ago
Milena looks super-sexy in and out of black leather.
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Komena
Sean 4 years ago
Wow, I guess I must be a "bad man" because I really like this set, and I'm a "bad man" for saying that she looks really hot, and that she appears to be enjoying herself in spite of what all you "good people" think. Okay, the "bad man" is now leaving the board. Say goodbye to the "bad man".
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Ignite
Sean 4 years ago
It's all subjective and in the eye of the beholder.
I personally like Leonardo's work, and don't like the way Murano photographs women. Rylsky's work...I can take it or leave it. As far as what his models "reveal" on his site, it's not much different than Met, but as far as his volume of content, it's a tiny fraction of what Met has. He has more studio shots (which I happen to like) because the focus is completely on the model and not on some giant "movie set back drop" or "postcard travel location" you see on Met and other sites. I'm here to look at beautiful women...not sand, or flowers, or trees, or furniture, or little bunny rabbits.
I do hear what you're saying though about the wave of "puritanicalism" that seems to be running rampant throughout many of the nude-art websites. I'm not sure who is responsible for that but it's actually been happening for about the last decade. The was a time when any shot, from any angle, near, or far was not considered "taboo." I think Met-Art is trying (or tried) to break out of it with "Sex-Art"...but that's a whole different discussion. I don't think studio models do well in a hardcore porn situation, and vice versa. Then again, I'm only one of thousands who only paid $15 to be here...so how much does my opinion really count?
Wednesday, June 12th, 2013 on Lily C
Sean 4 years ago
Words simply can not describe how beautiful Leila is.
I hope to see a lot more of her.
Wednesday, June 12th, 2013 on Leila A
Sean 4 years ago
Agree her sets are way, way too short. What's a few extra pics?
I really like the standing shots of her (she has really great legs.)
Wednesday, June 12th, 2013 on Lara D
Sean 4 years ago
Very hot. I really dig the way she moves around in that sexy outfit.
Monday, June 10th, 2013 on Opal
Sean 4 years ago
This set is very hot. It would be nice to see more standing shots where the models are not cut off at the knees.
Monday, June 10th, 2013 on Mastigio
Sean 4 years ago
Wow, what a shame. This set pretty much shows nothing of her absolutely beautiful body.
Monday, June 10th, 2013 on Agnos
Sean 4 years ago
Probably one of her hottest sets. I really like the tease shots with that short red dress.
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Exposat
Sean 4 years ago
Gemma is super beautiful, and I really dig that she doesn't shave.
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Cara Mia
Sean 4 years ago
First model that I fell in love with on Met...and even today I'd still drink her bathwater.
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013 on Jenya D
Sean 4 years ago
Words simply can not describe how beautiful Leila is.
I hope to see a lot more of her.
Wednesday, June 12th, 2013 on Leila A
Sean 4 years ago
Alina....come back!
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013 on Alina H
Sean 4 years ago
Hope to see more of this beautiful model.
Saturday, June 29th, 2013 on Toxic A
Sean 4 years ago
Interesting how nobody agrees with you.
Thursday, July 4th, 2013 on Seyir
Sean 4 years ago
It would be nice to see someone other than Erro take some shots of the beautiful Altea.
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013 on Altea B
Sean 4 years ago
I hope Semmi stays around for awhile. Since my whole world doesn't revolve around pubic hair...I really couldn't care less if she shaves or not. I feel lucky just to be able to see her nude on here.
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013 on Semmi A
Sean 4 years ago
All I can say is thank god for the "hide comments" button.
Monday, June 17th, 2013 on Caprice A
Sean 4 years ago
I like the model, I like the poses, but the image quality can use some work. Sorry, but the camera on my cheap smart phone can take clearer and sharper images than these, especially from a distance.
Thursday, July 11th, 2013 on Presenting Agata
Sean 4 years ago
Sweet beautiful girl.
Friday, July 5th, 2013 on Liv A
Sean 4 years ago
A very beautiful woman....and, I think she would 'also' look hot if she stopped shaving for awhile...and yes, I'm an American who happens to like fur. Shocking, I know.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Patsy A
Sean 4 years ago
I agree and disagree. Huge tats on hot women do not make them look hotter. But what looks worse is when an amateur Photoshop artist tries to remove them (the way they tried in her sets). It's good that whoever was trying to Photoshop her tats finally stopped trying.
Sunday, June 23rd, 2013 on Malena Morgan
Sean 4 years ago
Agree her sets are way, way too short. What's a few extra pics?
I really like the standing shots of her (she has really great legs.)
Wednesday, June 12th, 2013 on Lara D
Sean 4 years ago
I'm sorry, but I actually like it...because it's different...has that whole primitive /tribal thing going on. The only thing that could have made it better is if they both started going at it.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Pyyar
Sean 4 years ago
Sorry, but I'm not looking at the "flash in her eyes, the color of the wallpaper, or what the weather is doing outside"...I'm looking at her nice, perfect ass while she's bending over. It's a great set because of her poses and the fact the pictures aren't blurry.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Grenier
Sean 4 years ago
Maya is a total goddess.
It's tragic there weren't more sets of her.
Saturday, July 27th, 2013 on Maya C
Sean 4 years ago
Perfect 10.
End of story.
Wednesday, July 17th, 2013 on Nichole A
Sean 4 years ago
If that was truly the case, then it's a simple fix. Make a "Raw" uncompressed zip file available for those who are interested in spending the time to download it. Personally, I think many of these photographers are just using cheap equipment. Go look at some of Leonardo's work. The image quality in most of his sets is super-clear and crisp and the file sizes aren't much bigger.
If this was the year 2000, I could understand this problem, but it's the year 2013. High resolution cameras are cheap, bandwidth is cheap, storage space is cheap, etc. From a technology standpoint, there's really no valid excuse for it.
Friday, July 12th, 2013 on Presenting Agata
Sean 4 years ago
Goddess.
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013 on Anna AJ
Sean 4 years ago
Wow, what a super-hot babe.
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013 on Kloe Kane
Sean 4 years ago
Have to agree. Very sexy, super sweet looking babe I hope we see more of.
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Leona E
Sean 4 years ago
Wow, I guess I must be a "bad man" because I really like this set, and I'm a "bad man" for saying that she looks really hot, and that she appears to be enjoying herself in spite of what all you "good people" think. Okay, the "bad man" is now leaving the board. Say goodbye to the "bad man".
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Ignite
Sean 4 years ago
A uniquely beautiful body.
Saturday, July 27th, 2013 on Loreen A
Sean 4 years ago
Corny tats and tramp-stamps, especially lettered ones (probably some guy's name) that require extensive Photoshopping are an instant turn-off for me, no matter how hot the model is. I just can't get past them.
It's like spending $300,000 on a brand new Ferrari, and then spray-painting it with a can of $2 paint to “try and make it look better.” Sane people don't do things like that, but who knows, maybe somebody forced her to get it.
Thursday, July 11th, 2013 on Helen H
Sean 4 years ago
Michelle is super beautiful.
I hope she stays around awhile.
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013 on Michelle H
Sean 4 years ago
Hope to see more of Salma.
Wednesday, June 26th, 2013 on Salma C
Sean 4 years ago
Sexy girl, weak set. Way too short.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Agglia
Sean 4 years ago
Agree. I'm glad skin-tight jeans for woman finally made a comeback.
Saturday, June 22nd, 2013 on Pompau
Sean 4 years ago
It's all subjective and in the eye of the beholder.
I personally like Leonardo's work, and don't like the way Murano photographs women. Rylsky's work...I can take it or leave it. As far as what his models "reveal" on his site, it's not much different than Met, but as far as his volume of content, it's a tiny fraction of what Met has. He has more studio shots (which I happen to like) because the focus is completely on the model and not on some giant "movie set back drop" or "postcard travel location" you see on Met and other sites. I'm here to look at beautiful women...not sand, or flowers, or trees, or furniture, or little bunny rabbits.
I do hear what you're saying though about the wave of "puritanicalism" that seems to be running rampant throughout many of the nude-art websites. I'm not sure who is responsible for that but it's actually been happening for about the last decade. The was a time when any shot, from any angle, near, or far was not considered "taboo." I think Met-Art is trying (or tried) to break out of it with "Sex-Art"...but that's a whole different discussion. I don't think studio models do well in a hardcore porn situation, and vice versa. Then again, I'm only one of thousands who only paid $15 to be here...so how much does my opinion really count?
Wednesday, June 12th, 2013 on Lily C
Sean 4 years ago
Wow, what a shame. This set pretty much shows nothing of her absolutely beautiful body.
Monday, June 10th, 2013 on Agnos
Sean 4 years ago
Gemma is super beautiful, and I really dig that she doesn't shave.
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Cara Mia
Sean 4 years ago
This is probably one of the hottest sets I've seen in a while on here. Very erotic, nice close-ups, and you can tell the model is into pleasuring herself. Keep up the good work.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Nagna
Sean 4 years ago
Man, I really don't get what all the whining and sniveling is about. So a model doesn't get completely naked, and chooses to express herself through dance. Big freaken deal. It's not the end of the friggan world. There are billions of sets on MET.
I personally find it refreshing to see a lovely young women, with obvious dance skills and athletic ability, sharing her body and demonstrating her moves. I'll even go so far as to call it...sexy.
Sunday, November 3rd, 2013 on Ciseaux
Sean 4 years ago
I'll expand on it. The reason why it's sad is because it's degrading. Sure Caprice looks sweet and innocent in this set, but how does she look in her other sets where 25 dudes are pulling an anal train on her and using her mouth as a high-volume sperm receptacle?
But hey, some people consider humiliation, degradation and depravity to be "art"...right?
Saturday, November 2nd, 2013 on Konfido
Sean 4 years ago
Sweet beautiful girl.
Monday, October 28th, 2013 on Phileia
Sean 4 years ago
We need more hot Asian women on this site.
Wednesday, October 9th, 2013 on Pramila
Sean 4 years ago
Hopefully this one will hang around for awhile.
Thursday, September 5th, 2013 on Irish A
Sean 4 years ago
Kudos to all the Photoshop artists who have worked hard on Marina!
Tuesday, September 3rd, 2013 on Marina H
Sean 4 years ago
A lot of these photographers and editors are probably gay. Who else could be around all these super-hot women all day long and not go crazy? The problem is all these gay photographers have no idea what turns on a heterosexual man. That's the only logical explanation that explains why most of these beautiful women are posed the lame way they are with most of their clothes on.
Monday, August 19th, 2013 on Katya D
Sean 4 years ago
I don't mind water in a set (bath. pool. spray, whatever) because a wet hard body is very sexy...**just so long as every single picture doesn't have water COVERING UP up her whole body. A lot of times water (and soap) can be used as a PROP (like clothes) for the model to not have to reveal all.
Saturday, July 20th, 2013 on Meelitus
Sean 4 years ago
A very beautiful model.
I hope she stays around awhile.
Thursday, July 4th, 2013 on Angelique A
Sean 4 years ago
An extremely beautiful model but many of her sets are sort of boring and repetitive.
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013 on Barbara D
Sean 4 years ago
She's got it all.
Friday, June 28th, 2013 on Valeria A
Sean 4 years ago
Wow.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Amaca
Sean 4 years ago
One of my all-time favorites.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Rebecca C
Sean 4 years ago
Hey Sherlock, look at the 108th picture from her first set.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Zhanna B
Sean 4 years ago
Nice posing.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Dontosia
Sean 4 years ago
Agree. Anyone could have taken better pictures of her with an iPhone.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Ruzanna A
Sean 4 years ago
Sorry, but I've just never really understood all the fawning over her. I mean she's okay...but not "the hottest model that's ever walked the face of the earth" like most make her out to be.
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Nemel
Sean 4 years ago
I have to agree that she'd look better with a few more pounds added to her nice curvy frame. When she was younger and first started out on Hegre-Art she wasn't rail thin, and she looked super-hot.
Saturday, November 2nd, 2013 on Demanda
Sean 4 years ago
I have to agree. What's with the spray-painted white bike? Are we suppose to envision her riding around on that thing in real life? Yeah right.
Saturday, November 2nd, 2013 on Quartiere
Sean 4 years ago
Judging by the reaction, you'd think the photographer had just murdered every poster's mother on here in cold blood with an AR. Wow, take a deep breath and calm down...last time I checked, there's like a billion photosets on MET. By the way, I'm proud to be the only person (clearly in the entire universe) who happens to like this set, and the model.
Saturday, November 2nd, 2013 on Presenting Bagira
Sean 4 years ago
This is obviously an up-skirt tease set (which was very nicely done) and was clearly lost on 97% of the viewers...who are probably too young to know anything about up skirt tease sets. Bravo.
Saturday, November 2nd, 2013 on Matrame
Sean 4 years ago
Really?...so is that new rule?...sets with clear, crisp, sharp images are considered porn sets??
Monday, October 28th, 2013 on Silenzio
Sean 4 years ago
Super-hot girl in a set that looks like it was shot with a Polaroid Insta-matic camera from the 1970's.
Monday, October 28th, 2013 on Silenzio
Sean 4 years ago
I think a lot of these photogs and editors are either gay, terrified of women, or they used to be fashion photographers. Those are about the only reasons why you would not want to get close up to these beautiful women.
Saturday, October 12th, 2013 on Essendo
Sean 4 years ago
She made it up.
It's not her real name.
Wednesday, October 9th, 2013 on Jeff Milton
Sean 4 years ago
I agree, she needs to be in films.
Saturday, September 7th, 2013 on Oliwia A
Sean 4 years ago
You gotta love a woman that will bend over and show you her butt with a big smile on her face.
Saturday, September 7th, 2013 on Biscoto
Sean 4 years ago
Very erotic. It's nice to see more explicit photos from Catherine.
Thursday, September 5th, 2013 on Absolvo
Sean 4 years ago
Thank you! Yes, you're correct about the decapitations and hacking off body parts with the camera.
Straight on (no tilted camera) full-length (not hacked off at the knee or head) whole body shots, taken with a high-res camera (well lit with and no blur) is where it's at! If this site, or any other, could do that more often, they'd have me as a daily member for life instead of a few times a year.
Sunday, August 18th, 2013 on Efectos
Sean 4 years ago
There's no way in hell this is a new and current set. It's gotta be an old archive set from the 1990's they accidentally slipped into the mix. No modern-day 30+ megapixel camera owner in their right mind would purposefully go out of their way to create pictures this pixelated, blurry and ugly.
Saturday, August 17th, 2013 on Presenting Leonda
Sean 4 years ago
The style is called: "I'm using the same old 5-mega pixel camera I bought back in 1998 when Met started"
Saturday, August 17th, 2013 on Presenting Leonda
Sean 4 years ago
Like the sexy outfit.
Friday, August 16th, 2013 on Lucky 8
Sean 4 years ago
14 Megapixels, really? The camera on my iPhone can take better pictures than these. Seriously. I guess we better pass the hat around and take up a collection so all these dead-broke photogs can go out and buy some better cameras.
Friday, August 16th, 2013 on Elefina
Sean 4 years ago
Uma is super sexy and has an incredible body.
It's good to have her back!
Saturday, July 20th, 2013 on Uma A
Sean 4 years ago
Very sexy set. I like the sheer dress and how it hits her legs right above the thigh.
Wednesday, July 17th, 2013 on Omorfia
Sean 4 years ago
Shy?...after 10 years of posing nude? Are you high?
Wednesday, July 3rd, 2013 on Esquivo
Sean 4 years ago
Wow...
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013 on Web
Sean 4 years ago
Sounds like it's time for your shrink to up your lithium dose.
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013 on Sciroppo
Sean 4 years ago
Really hot girl, but a better photographer needs to be shooting her.
Tuesday, July 2nd, 2013 on Brigitte D
Sean 4 years ago
We need more studio sets of this elegant beauty like this one.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Snerta
Sean 4 years ago
I have to agree. The green 2-tone stripped couch doesn't add anything, in fact, it distracts from the model. She would have looked way better in a studio with just a solid color background behind her with a simple chair or bench to sit on.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Geruza
Sean 4 years ago
Hey Sparky, this is obviously some guy's wife we're talking about. Sure, he may be cool with what she's doing, or he may not be, but that doesn't mean every guy in the whole wide world is going to be cool with the idea of fantasizing about somebody's wife. That's why photographers have models remove their wedding rings. Think about it.
Monday, June 24th, 2013 on Chiamare
Sean 4 years ago
The most common answers I hear from women as to "why they got tats" is generally along the lines of "because it's cool" and "all my friends have them". I think in most cases they do it because of social pressure rather than some "personal thing"...especially when the tat is some non-unique tribal arm band / tramp stamp, insect, or flower that everyone else has.
Sunday, June 23rd, 2013 on Anasazi
Sean 4 years ago
Don't understand the low ratings for this little beauty.
It's gotta be the way she's being posed in her sets.
Saturday, June 22nd, 2013 on Conocido
Sean 4 years ago
Cool bed.
Saturday, June 22nd, 2013 on Palladis
Sean 4 years ago
Super beautiful model and I like the poses.
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Orea
Sean 4 years ago
Whatever you're smoking...I want some.
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Syrtis
Sean 4 years ago
Great set. Would have liked to see a bit more of that catsuit before she peeled it off.
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Calligraphie
Sean 4 years ago
Wow, why are you here?
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Profora
Sean 4 years ago
Milena looks super-sexy in and out of black leather.
Sunday, June 16th, 2013 on Komena
Sean 4 years ago
Very hot. I really dig the way she moves around in that sexy outfit.
Monday, June 10th, 2013 on Opal
Sean 4 years ago
This set is very hot. It would be nice to see more standing shots where the models are not cut off at the knees.
Monday, June 10th, 2013 on Mastigio
Sean 4 years ago
Probably one of her hottest sets. I really like the tease shots with that short red dress.
Wednesday, June 5th, 2013 on Exposat
arkie 4 years ago
Maybe it was done in her "wilder" days - although as young as she's reported, it's hard to believe she's had many of those. Maybe it was done on a whim, but it looks like it's some sort of stylized religious motif - possibly a rosary - and that may lead to a religious/family connection.
Saturday, January 11th, 2014 on Helen H
Wanderer 4 years ago
Quite. The erect nipples and pussy framed in the net make this outstanding. Thanks to Michelle and G.
There is another set with this costume tbc
Thursday, December 12th, 2013 on Web
desertrat 4 years ago
Sean, are you sane?
Tuesday, December 10th, 2013 on Nemel
MarkusluvSofi 4 years ago
I'd love to have a bed like that, only a bit larger :D
Wednesday, November 27th, 2013 on Palladis
MarkusluvSofi 4 years ago
I swear I've seen this bed and maybe even the room that it's in from another source on the web, as more a photo of the bed itself. And I don't think it was from Met-Art or any nude site. Didn't have a model. In fact I think it was a FB link that was showing worlds most creative furniture.
Wednesday, November 27th, 2013 on Palladis
rachsback 4 years ago
How about looking at the COVER of her first set!? It's about six inches above this copy... ;o)
Thursday, November 14th, 2013 on Zhanna B
rachsback 4 years ago
Bingo!!
Thursday, November 14th, 2013 on Grenier
Thor C 4 years ago
It's funny how people have so much different opinions and tastes. :)
I'm totally the opposite of you: I prefer much more outdoor sets rather than studio sets. My preference is, from bigger to least: outdoors > indoors with a background (like in a bedroom, living room, etc.) > studio with a plain background.
I find studio sets so boring, savorless and without creativity (I do like some though; it also depends on the model, the poses, the beauty of the set, the effort putted into it, and other factors). I do not want to see only the model, like you, I want to see the model in a place where I can put my imagination to work. It's hard to fantasize in a fake environment (regarding studio sets); it's much more easy to fantasize you and the model when it's in a real place. Also I like to see beautiful places and landscapes.
The ideal photo session for me is like the "Albus" set with Nikia A I mentioned before: the model starts with clothes on in a public place, than makes some shots half naked outdoors and than go indoors and finish the set. Perfect! It could also have finished outdoors, no problem; but the three different places created a kind of story, with start, middle, and ending. The perfect set for me has to tell a story, like that one; it has to have a start, a middle, and an ending. Studio sets for me has only the middle (if the model starts already naked; like in many of Rylsky's sets); it's better, though, if she starts with clothes on and finish it totally naked, like in Antonio Clemens' studio sets. Than it's "start and middle" at least, not only "middle". :P
Tuesday, November 12th, 2013 on Lily C
Browning 4 years ago
I agree 100%
Sunday, November 10th, 2013 on Helen H
Asian Lover 4 years ago
If you only paid $15 to be here then we in Australia are subsidising your subscription and I'm pretty well pissed off about that I can tell you! I've been thinking about cancelling when my subscription is due for renewal anyway, haven't been getting email notifications that my favourites are on for several months and didn't even get a response when I emailed Sex-Art to let them know my account had possibly been hacked and someone named "Ardent Fan" had been posting on my account. Not happy to say the least. Then Lilly comes along and makes it all worthwhile....
Friday, October 25th, 2013 on Lily C
MarkusluvSofi 4 years ago
Alina is too beautiful to not continue modeling. Such a natural beauty is hard too see go. I love her hairy bush, and wouldn't mind to see a little armpit hair on her either.
Thursday, September 19th, 2013 on Alina H
Rylsky 4 years ago
Sean, thank you very much!
I want your comments daily!
ROFL :)
Tuesday, September 17th, 2013 on Elefina
fer_realz 4 years ago
Dude obviously needs to get a pair of glasses.
Personally, I think this is Miela's sexiest set of all. Besides her first movie, that is.
Saturday, August 10th, 2013 on Seyir
justagigolo 4 years ago
This seems to be a common problem on Met-Art these days (and with others in the network) and I don't believe it is just a matter of the photographer or his technical expertise. I was just looking at some pics from my 2007 Met-Art library that were very much crisper and clearer. I have always downloaded in "Medium". Changing up to "High" on a few different sets recently makes no great difference. Has the expansion of the network diluted the quality?
Thursday, July 11th, 2013 on Presenting Agata