I tried to like it, but dick says no.
Thursday, February 8th, 2018 on Tanca
My thoughts exactly. Sexy it is not.
Monday, January 29th, 2018 on Ledes
Yuki en we deserve so much better than another incoherent sloppy job from Fabrice.
Friday, January 19th, 2018 on Arety
Nothing gets my dick hard like a ladder in a shower - like WTAF??
Saturday, January 6th, 2018 on Jadae
Dick says no., sees distractions everywhere.
Friday, December 22nd, 2017 on Yariki
Horrible setting (a chair in a corner), poor lighting (harsh shadows on the wall behind), unispired posing (plus too many poses that are simply the same as the previous/next one). No chemistry between the model and the photograper. And are pimples on a girls buttocks the new sexy, or is Photoshop so 2016? Anyways, I'll pass.
PS I was being nice.
Wednesday, December 13th, 2017 on Repima
Last time a girl painted her nails in the colour of my chairs, I wrecked my foreskin.
@daniel: call me!
Monday, December 11th, 2017 on Sebbia
Great set. I especially love #116 en #120, the latter being the stuff I'd like on my bedroom wall.
Thursday, November 16th, 2017 on Onette
BAD LIGHTING/SHADOWS ON METART, SIR? HOW DARE YOU, SIR? METART HAS RECEIVED NUMEROUS (OH WAIT VASTLY ANY) AWARDS REGARDING THE TOPIC OF PERFECTLY EXECUTED PHOTOGRAPHS IN THE FIELD OF LIGHTING/SHADOW AND SHIT.
Friday, November 3rd, 2017 on Deryn
E.G. I do not like the fact that photo #7 and photo #8 are so different one bit. I mean WTAF?? #7 could be from Star Wars, #8 from Titanic. Mat Art needs to get a grip BIG TIME or I am totally out of here (PS #lol Whatever guys, I'm cancelling my subscription to this heap of poo faster the
n Harvey Weinstein is going to jail)
That's a prety sloppy job for a so called pro. A little self respect and respect for the paying members here would not hurt him one bit.
Monday, October 30th, 2017 on Hiere
Pro tip: always shave for the occasion.
Saturday, October 14th, 2017 on Galila
Poor lighting, not wet. 1/10
Saturday, October 14th, 2017 on Jadeni
Horrible setting. Bad posing. Overrated photographer. Shame.
Saturday, September 23rd, 2017 on Ristie
I second that.
Saturday, September 23rd, 2017 on Morey
Desperately needing something wet here, and a Lightroom brush to get rid of those dirty spots in the upper right corner. Then we'll talk again.
Sunday, September 17th, 2017 on Ledda
This is bad, really bad.
Unless badly lit models get your dick hard, of course. Mine, not so much.
Thursday, September 14th, 2017 on Cynola
Tuesday, August 15th, 2017 on Boaly
Did that bicycle come with the shoot or was it vice versa?
Nah, just kidding. It's not to bad. The shoot, I mean.
Perfect conditions, yet poorly executed.
Thursday, July 27th, 2017 on Presenting Margo Beth
I particularly like the ending where she gets dressed.
Saturday, July 22nd, 2017 on Sarone
Outdoor flash photography on Met Art gone horribly wrong, part 237. Why the fuck do I have to pay for this kind of amateur crap? I feel violated. Enough of this already FFS.
Thursday, July 20th, 2017 on Thedomi
This website needs a props filter.
Monday, July 10th, 2017 on Porena
Shooting nude models outside is very seldom a good idea, unless your skills and material are up for the job (and you have an assistant at hand). Also this set has way too many pics that look almost identical. So sad.
Monday, July 10th, 2017 on Helidae
Get the fuck off my lawn, Leonardo.
Monday, July 10th, 2017 on Tulinea
Baffling. My mom takes beter pics with her iPad. Having a model to pose in such bad lighting conditions i.e. plain sunlight and all of the harsh unflattering shadows that come along with it really beats the crap out of me. But what do I know.
Sunday, July 9th, 2017 on Porinne
Yes, it is ofc always easier to think of these things in hindsight. Unless you're a good photographer and tend to know what you're doing most of the time.
Monday, May 29th, 2017 on Alindis
Lots of pics are very similar. Could have done with a quarter of the quantity and throw away the rest. Selection is not the photographers forte, me thinks.
Wednesday, May 24th, 2017 on Treshy
I was really looking forward to this set but this is pretty underwhelming stuff (unless you have a cafetiere fetish, that is, which I have not).
Mila derserves so much better.
Friday, May 19th, 2017 on Soleba
Wow. Kudos to the photographer. I love how she manages to get that many distracting items in one set. Love the airco in #23. Love #34 too, cause cropping is such a waste of time. And #48 is probably the best pic ever on this website. Keep it up buddies!
Thursday, May 18th, 2017 on Cavida
You might wanna try to avoid those distracting harsh shadows, or you could just not give a fuck and look like an amateur.
Thursday, April 13th, 2017 on Resca
Friday, March 24th, 2017 on Telehae
"OMG, you can almost see her pussy."*
*my limp dick talking
Friday, March 24th, 2017 on Taolmi
This set 's got everything the Fabrice-set of today (of anyday for that matter) lacks horribly.
Sexy, original, playful, intriguing, hot, stylish, classy, arousing, skillful, seductive, teeth.
Monday, March 20th, 2017 on Kenati
Utterly useless and distracting props and no magic whatsoever, gentlemen: I give you Fabrice, part 47.
And what is worng with the teeth on that girl? Does she even have any?
Also: I came on image #30.*
* Said nobody, ever.
Monday, March 20th, 2017 on Catade
Ugh. Horrible set once again from Fabrice. Guy has not got a clue what decent lighting is all about. Neither have most of the subscribers apparantly, but at least that is understandable. Still don't get why we are having to pay good money for the work of an obvious amateur, though.
His crappy sets are bringing the general level/feel of quality down. So sad.
She's freaking hot, though.
Thursday, March 16th, 2017 on Ametzi
Disappointing set. Uninspired. Ugly setting. Rush job for sure.
And if you can't work around the distracting reflections of t he windows in the glasses, you should drop them altogether. Standards going down ever more rapidly, now even for Mila. Anyway, I won't stick around long anymore., so help me god
Thursday, February 23rd, 2017 on Prisenti
Wednesday, February 22nd, 2017 on Renalca
Sadly, I have to agree. Furthermore, there is a lot more that is wrong with this set. Like the make up (put on by a blind elephant I guess?) and the fact that there is no connection between the photographer and the model what so ever. The word 'Akward' describes this set perfectly if you ask me.
And yes, overall another disappointing day indeed. Another step closer to not renewing my membership.
Thursday, February 16th, 2017 on Emiasa
The whole setting is incredibly tacky. My eyes are hurting. Funny how nobody seems to notice. Low standards just ain't my thang I guess.
Tuesday, February 14th, 2017 on Presenting Claire
Those coloured pillows are horrible. A shame yet again. Could have been so much better, i.e. stylish.
Caution: no pussy to see here. Carry on.
Monday, February 6th, 2017 on Karemn
Okay guys. This is getting ridicious. Sack that Fabrice guy for crying out loud. Horrible work, not worthy of this website at all. I really do not understand why this joke of a photographer is still around.
Friday, February 3rd, 2017 on Cojena
Simply astonishing. One of the best sets ever on this website. Supreme in every way.
Tuesday, January 31st, 2017 on Alfire
Just another crappy beach set from Fabrice. Ugh, enough already.
Tuesday, January 31st, 2017 on Presenting Shannon
Worst set of 2017. Second pic is already out of focus and do not get me started about the umbrella in pic #11. Incompetent, sloppy and a huge shame this lady did not get a decent photographer. This is one of the reasons I will most probably not renew my subscription. Too much average girls and even worse photographers who do not give a fuck about lightning and variety bring the whole site down to an alarmingly low level of quality.
Wednesday, January 25th, 2017 on Presenting Keita
Horrible shoot, rating says it all. Lots of pics hardly or not in focus at all. I mean: WTAF? Try taking a photography class and come back later, dear Fabrice. Could have been great, now it's mediocre at best. Shame.
Thursday, January 5th, 2017 on Lemmaz
Sunday, January 7th, 2018 on Jadae
Concentrate on irrelevant details much?
You could always do what I did. Remove the pimples with a simple photo editor.
Vanessa is a REAL woman, not a plastic doll. I'd rather have a real girl-next-door than an unrealistic over made-up barbie doll. That's just my preference, and as Arkie points out, many share that preference here. As for no chemistry, I have to disagree on that also.
I'm sure many members were/are grateful for you being so "nice". "Nice" isn't quite the way it sounds... condescending maybe, but definitely not "nice".
You could simply have said "pass" or moved on.
But then it is your right to express your opinion... maybe if not just a bit more tactfully.
I don't think Matiss does a bad job with her, but for some reason his sets with Gabriela aren't on the same level as with some of his other girls. Gabriela has a smoking hot body, but this set doesn't use the full potential. The rear poses are not that good, she starts out with heels but too few standing leggy poses in them.
I always like to see the gals mix it up with photogs for that different look, so I agree with you in principle, maybe not for the same reasons.
"WOW", your mother takes photographs of beautiful naked young women, that must have been quite an upbringing, I just had to settle for friends, family and holiday snaps. : )
Honestly I would be a terrible nude photographer, as soon as some gorgeous girl like Yelena would start taking her clothes off I would get all flustered and forget everything I knew about photography, not to mention not being able to stop myself from hitting on her, so unprofessional... :-P
Redundancy is a common problem with all the sets.
I never could get mine to talk...
but if it did, it would be saying the same thing. Not that I expected any different from this artist.
Why so non-committal - or scratch that - since you've posted "meh" you obviously _are_ committal - what doesn't "do it" for you in this set? Luka Helios sometimes reads the comments and something more than "meh" might give him an idea of what you didn't like.
As was noted/stated elsewhere on this site, that's not what you're going to get from Ms. Schon's work. Too, maybe Kira's not into that kind of "presentation". Have to consider both sides of the coin. Historically, if you look at Ms. Schon's work, you'll seldom see any sort of a graphic depiction of a model in her work... just not her "style".
One of my constant complaints is many photographers are clueless to the fact that a full-blown smile is very sexy.
1 out of 11 last comments in a positive bent. Something says that you're just not happy here.God go with you...
No close ups and not as many lovely spread shots as usual but she stills shows her hot, heavenly haven in a few shots so I'd certainly argue against the "no pussy to see here", although not enough may be apt, although it always is so where this gorgeous girl is concerned.
I must, respectfully, disagree. I can't count how many of Fabrice/Goncharov's beach sets I've seen, but I never seem to tire of them. Especially when the star is someone like Shannon.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2018 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.