"[...] people can move to any country and live there long time." Not exactly. You need visa, you know. And sometimes it's very hard to get; specially for USA, and even more if you're coming from the third world.
"So what must be written in her bio if she is modeling during her education?" What about the country she was born? That will never change, doesn't matter where she currently resides.
"Let us know why you 'need to know it'?" He used 'need to know' as an euphemism. He meant that he would like to know; and I can perfectly understand his query, 'cause the bio should state the country where the model was born, and, as I said, that will never change.
Monday, January 4th, 2016 on Virginia Sun
She's not one of my favorites, but I was brought here by that incredible cover photo. It's the best looking cover photo that I've seen lately! The colors are great, the lighting is just right, the scenario is beautiful and Anna is remarkably beautiful there; more than I remember from most of her other covers.
I wonder how do these photographers find these amazing locations. Does they keep hovering over the houses and estates in Google Earth and than, "Hey, that seems like a nice spot. I'll pay them a visit." :P
Friday, December 4th, 2015 on Talivy
Very beautiful girl and great ass. A pity that there have been already 5 sets until now and she's not shaved or trimmed in any single one of them, so the guys who are not fans of hairy pussies like me cannot enjoy her. :(
Saturday, November 28th, 2015 on Una Piccola
I've just noticed this model and, OMG, I've never seen multi-colored eyes like these! They are so beautiful! *_*
Saturday, June 13th, 2015 on Lenore
I don't like this bokeh effect. It's too much exaggerated. I like to see some of the background, the scenery - it adds to the composition of the photo and make it look whole. In most of the photos you can't see the background at all, too blurry.
Monday, May 25th, 2015 on Presenting Araya Acosta
Finally a new movie with her after more than two years (but again on a beach? More variety please!)! Though I usually prefer Leonardo's - more sexier/hotter. But I didn't watch this yet; we'll see.
Gosh, there should be more movies with her! Please, Leonardo, Luca!
Wednesday, February 4th, 2015 on Mercana
There are frequent photoset updates with her on Glamour.cz currently. Though I don't know if they are old sets or recent ones. But I think they are recent.
Wednesday, February 4th, 2015 on Marise
Hehe, she's actually on the nude since 2005. :P
Wednesday, January 7th, 2015 on Presenting Ariel Rebel
I hate when photographers use artificial lighting on outdoor sets, specially when they exaggerate on it. It makes the photos look like studio photos. What's the point in shooting outdoors if you're not going to make use of the natural light?! It looks like photos made in a studio with a fake landscape panel on the back. It takes away all the magic and beauty of an outdoors set.
Tuesday, December 16th, 2014 on Ekfrasi
What happened to the H.264/MP4 video format?? :(
Tuesday, November 4th, 2014 on Raje
Very beautiful girl! She reminds me of Janie A (unfortunately just a passing-byer on nude art), specially on photo #50. She has the same eyes, same hair, same skin and nipple tones, similar body and similar face.
It seems MetArt is opening its mind lately and giving us more variety: dyed hair, now exotic piercings...
So many people complaining about it. Please, don't be a dick and accept other people's tastes. Variety is good for everyone; some things you may like and other people don't, some things you may dislike and other people enjoy. I, for one, dislike unshaven girls, but I understand that some people enjoy it and I respect that; I just skip those sets. I'm not particularly a fan of pierced nipples, but really I don't mind it; while I'm sure some people enjoy it very much.
Like I said on another post: as new generations are born, so does new habits and fashions. So if you don't like some new trend or another, just keep it to yourself and skip that girl or set. There are all kinds of women in the world for all kinds of men, and this site is opening its mind and accepting it more lately. At least you don't see girls all covered in tattoos and piercings here, just a small and modest quantity and sizes.
MetArt has a great number of weekly sets - no other erotic site beats MetArt on that, so if you don't like something about a girl on a set, just SKIP it! And you don't need to worry, the great majority of MetArt sets still features girls on their natural beauty (apart from shaving), so you'll still have the girls as you like on most of the sets. ;)
I hope to see more of Alice. :)
Thursday, October 16th, 2014 on Presenting Alice
hipshot is right, it's becoming popular among the young. It's becoming a trend around the world, not just @ MetArt. As new generations are born, so do new habits and fashions. :P It comes from the Japanese culture, from animes, more specifically; and it's becoming increasingly more popular after the boom of the k-pop (Korean Pop Music); the girls in the videos always use these kind of hair. It's very common in Japan nowadays to see girls with blue, pink, purple hair on the streets, and it's spreading to the whole world, with the anime and k-pop culture. I'm not so young anymore, I'm 28, but I do like it a lot, but I do like animes too. ^^
Friday, September 26th, 2014 on Presenting Amarna Miller
Nice find, Luca! Pretty girl, beautiful hair. :)
I've not watched the movie, just wanted to speak about the cover. Regarding the portrait position cover, I've never seen a worse cover on MetArt! It's blurry, you can see a ghost on Lorena's right leg; it looks like there's crop on the right side of her face; the picture has a low quality... Horrible! I don't know why Helios and MetArt chose this picture as the cover.
But... paying more attention now, it seems it is a snapshot, not a photo; that'd explain the low quality. Maybe Lucas didn't take pictures (photographs) when he recorded this movie.
Tuesday, September 23rd, 2014 on Anstro
Finally she is back after a year absent! :D I thought she was gone forever, like so many stunning girls that appear here and stays for a short time.
Rylsky, don't ever quit on her! :P
Saturday, August 9th, 2014 on Polytes
Dear MetArt, when will we see Lily shaved?
Friday, April 18th, 2014 on Lily C
And while browsing through the photos, I almost had my hopes high of finally seeing a provocative set after so much time, after so many puritanic ones, but no, another puritanic one! :( The only two provocative photos (#38 and #39) were spoiled by the angle and the tilting of the camera! I hate photos on a diagonal! You have to bend your head to one side to see the photo straight, and that's very uncomfortable, especially if you want to take a long time staring to the photo. And they could have been more provocative if Luca positioned himself more to the left, more behind her. Then it would have been two GREAT photos to pay a tribute to (if you know what I mean :P)!
So this time the puritanism was not Indiana's fault, as she did a good pose - my favorite pose in photos: the doggy. This time it was the photographer's fault. :/
Another Indiana's set rejected to my collection, unfortunately. I adore her so much, but I lost my hopes of seeing a provocative set like she used to do in the past. :(
Thursday, March 13th, 2014 on Medier
"Remaneo" set: indoors and black dress. "Abrazar" set: indoors and black nightdress. "Litere" set: indoors and black nightdress. Errr... could we have something different, Rylsky?
Saturday, March 1st, 2014 on Flavia A
Rylsky, please, don't spoil the photos with so much Photoshop! In some photos she looks like a wax dummy with that much retouching! Specially on face, pussy and butt closeup photos. Photos #3, #27, #29 and #99 are the worst in that matter!
Please, I think most of the people here like to see the real skin of the model: pores and imperfections; a person, not a doll.
Friday, February 28th, 2014 on Chila
They couldn't have been done all together as they are from different photographers. It's expected that those last sets of her are afar from each other if the photographers worked with her in different times.
You can see that these last two sets of her (Ekfrasi and Flere) are close in time to each other, as they were made by the same photographer.
Friday, February 28th, 2014 on Mika A
Leonardo always use this spotlight even on daytime outdoors sets like this! He is capable of spoiling a could-be-good photo with this bright white artificial lighting! The photos could have been much more beautiful if illuminated by the natural sunlight. This bright white light he always uses makes the photos in this set look like studio photos in a fake background.
It's a pity, as his models are beautiful and he often takes nice sexy shots, but they are frequently spoiled by this bright white exaggerated artificial lighting he uses; specially when it's on daytime outdoors sets like this.
Monday, February 24th, 2014 on Presenting Milana
LOL! Leocont comes back working with her for MetArt after FIVE years! Why absent for so long, I wonder!
She was already a favorite of mine back then, although her photos are usually too puritanical for my taste.
She's returned first on EroticBeauty with some sparsely published sets; now she's on MetArt again. Hope she stays now. :)
Monday, January 13th, 2014 on Mejarane
People have different tastes and opinions. I for one don't mind these kind of photos. I would even say it's sexy. I like the striptease. :P
Tuesday, December 31st, 2013 on Quartiere
I agree with you about the retouching. I don't care about the armpits though, but I do care about the pussy! It's like you said: it's not even a convincing job; we can see it's fake!
Hey, Iskan, we want to see the real skin of the model! We want to see the pores and the imperfections on the model's skin. Summarizing: we want to see a woman, not a cartoon!
In most of the photos she is with arms down. She is indeed doing something with them or her hands. But if you want the model not doing any pose, standing still like in a document photo, go to Hedre-Art. There you will find a lot of photosets with savorless photos with the models not doing any poses or practically on the same pose the whole photoset!
Leonardo discovers the sunlight.
Friday, December 27th, 2013 on Polema
It's funny how people have so much different opinions and tastes. :)
I'm totally the opposite of you: I prefer much more outdoor sets rather than studio sets. My preference is, from bigger to least: outdoors > indoors with a background (like in a bedroom, living room, etc.) > studio with a plain background.
I find studio sets so boring, savorless and without creativity (I do like some though; it also depends on the model, the poses, the beauty of the set, the effort putted into it, and other factors). I do not want to see only the model, like you, I want to see the model in a place where I can put my imagination to work. It's hard to fantasize in a fake environment (regarding studio sets); it's much more easy to fantasize you and the model when it's in a real place. Also I like to see beautiful places and landscapes.
The ideal photo session for me is like the "Albus" set with Nikia A I mentioned before: the model starts with clothes on in a public place, than makes some shots half naked outdoors and than go indoors and finish the set. Perfect! It could also have finished outdoors, no problem; but the three different places created a kind of story, with start, middle, and ending. The perfect set for me has to tell a story, like that one; it has to have a start, a middle, and an ending. Studio sets for me has only the middle (if the model starts already naked; like in many of Rylsky's sets); it's better, though, if she starts with clothes on and finish it totally naked, like in Antonio Clemens' studio sets. Than it's "start and middle" at least, not only "middle". :P
Tuesday, November 12th, 2013 on Lily C
Than she should do some body building and eat some protein to get a well toned body healthily, not eat fats and cholesterol and get a bigger but flaccid body, and doing bad for her health even. ¬¬
Tuesday, November 12th, 2013 on Loretta A
Where did you see "artist pride" or rudeness in Rylsky's comment, Yorkhesan? I think he was very humble and fair when he said "nothing could be named as the best when it is about senses."
He was totally the opposite of what you accused him of. He was humble and just, leaving his ego aside and stating that his work could not be declared as "the best" when it's about people's tastes. He meant that there's no such thing as "the best set", as people have different tastes and opinions; like yourself, that think the opposite of Alex's opinion about the best photographer.
Why did you think he should thank you for speaking well of his pictures? I think the problem is that you both misinterpreted each other's comments: first you said that *in your opinion* Sharon's best set here is "Fontan" (of course you can have your opinion about the best set - everyone has), and than he said that there's no such thing as "the best" set when it's about peoples tastes; he failed to understand that you were giving *your* opinion about the best set, not speaking for everyone. Of course, if we were to consider everyone's opinions, each one will have different tastes and opinions about "the best" set.
But than you also misinterpreted his comment when he said: "nothing could be named as the best when it is about senses." He was just considering everyone's tastes and being humble and stating that no one's work could be considered "the best" when it's about people's tastes, or "senses", as he putted it. :P And you interpreted his response as being rude, and he was not. It was just a misunderstanding.
And please, don't criticize people's English; no non-native English speaker is obliged to speak perfect English. You look childish and without moral when you do that. I too am not a native English speaker myself and I was able to understand him well. He is Russian, so could speak his language so well as he does?
So please, don't criticize people about that. YOU were the rude when you did that. You were also rude when you asked him not to comment anymore; and you also contradicted yourself when you said he has the right to comment on what he wants and then you said you have the right to ask him not to comment anymore. Whoa! If he has the right to comment on what he wants, how can you ask him not to comment anymore?
Thursday, November 7th, 2013 on Sharon D
I thought I had seen all Lily C sets since 2010, but I recently discovered I had never seen this one, so I downloaded it now and saw it. Well, I always thought Leonardo's photo shoots overlightened, but this one is brighter than the midday sun! LOL!
It's like an artificial white sun in front of her, it's like she is 10 feet away from stadium lights! Photo #74 is so bright that her ass is almost white! The lightning is so bright and artificial that it makes hard to fantasize with the photos.
A pity a set so sexy and exciting as this one spoiled by an exaggerated lightning. :( Maybe Leonardo should learn with Luca Helios and Erro to take advantage of the natural sunlight for a change. He aways uses artificial lightning even in outdoors sets under the daylight!
And in the case of absence of the sunlight, maybe flash would have a better result than the over exposed continuous lightning he uses, or maybe use less light bulbs, or position them farther away from the model at least.
Leonardo, you take nice photos! [thumbs up!] But you need to rethink your concept of lighting.
Friday, October 18th, 2013 on Stagona
According to theNUDE.eu they are real. Either way, I DON'T REALLY CARE! She is a gorgeous beautiful woman! You guys look like a bunch of pussies! "Oh, they are fake! Mine are REAL, bitch!"
Tuesday, September 10th, 2013 on Red Fox
This set's cover is the most beautiful one I've seen on MetArt yet! :)
Monday, September 2nd, 2013 on Pommes
I love Indiana, she's one of my greatest faves since her debut; but I miss the sensuality she had in her older sets, back in 2008 and 09, and a few in 10 and 11. Her old sets are much more sexy and provocative, she used to show much more back then.
She seems too shy and timid nowadays. If we were to compare the sensuality and provocativeness of her old sets with the current ones like we do for movies, her old sets would be rated "R" or "NC-17", while the newer ones could be "PG-13". :/
Saturday, August 31st, 2013 on Indiana A
What good are sexy string tan lines on the butt if the photographer doesn't exploit it?! Only two rear shots in the whole set?! What a waste of sexiness! :(
Thursday, August 29th, 2013 on Mythica
"...and looking at the sets he has shot of LILLY C, he hasn't shot a 'close-up pussy' since 25/11/2011."
You are sorely mistaken at that, my fellow. There are pussy close-up photos in her recent photo sets "Sentido" by Luca Helios and "Soporte" by Leonardo. And there are in others after 11/25/11 too.
If you see the submissions page for photographers here on Met, one of their guidelines is: "DO NOT forget to get close ups of her face and body parts."
It's one of their requirements, so you will always see close-ups of face and body parts here! Besides, the photos are in high resolution, you can always zoom in close to body parts in any photo. That's the thing I love in high-res erotic photos: he possibility to zoom in to face, body parts, or any other detail in the photo, without losing quality. :)
"Rylsky has opened his own site, so he's obviously keeping his best for that"
I have to disagree with you in that too. I've seen some Rylsky Art sets and I think exactly the opposite of you: his best sets are on Met! Most of the sets on his site are studio sets, with no scenery, no beautiful landscapes... just a plain uncomely background; the models start already naked, no clothes or props on... very simple and savorless sets. Now on MetArt, it's another story: his sets here are very beautiful and creative! It looks like they are from another photographer other than Rylsky Art's Rylsky. :P I've recently seen his "Albus" set, with Nikia A; one of the most creative sets I've seen in MetArt yet! Half outdoors, half in indoors; the model starts with clothes on in a public place and than go for a stroll before going indoors... Very creative and beautiful set!
It seems he keeps his best works for MetArt still. :)
Monday, June 3rd, 2013 on Lily C
Maybe this is because many people complain about not enough closeups, there is always somebody, who can't see this or that... And forget about the Art... :)
Monday, May 25th, 2015 on Ekfrasi
What the hell are you complaining about????? I will take Flavia in anything at all, or naked. This woman is beautiful no matter haw you see her.
Tuesday, April 28th, 2015 on Flavia A
Thor, The glamour.cz sets up through 2009 were probably semi-current at the time. The ones from 2014 on are repeats of earlier fevermodels.com sets (she was Sally). I think she did some commercial modeling after 2011, and may have had a small business. The last photos I’ve seen of her (Sept 2014) she seemed domestic (and very pregnant).
Thursday, February 5th, 2015 on Marise
very true *^_^*
..although that site is promoting me very terribly and all the links are to some horrible galleries. They dont display all the gorgeous new ones I've been shooting for my site over the years but I was happy to see that at least, the gorgeous MetArt set is there!! *^_^*
I'm so blessed to have the chance to be in here with you all and all the GORGEOUS other ladies *O_O*
Saturday, January 10th, 2015 on Presenting Ariel Rebel
Well said, Thor. ( :
Friday, October 17th, 2014 on Presenting Alice
One: Each to his/her own --
Two: No one here keeps anything to themselves.
LOL "Not so young anymore"!!! LMFAO!! 28!? Some of us were 28 MORE than 28 years ago!!! YOU are "pretty young", and your fascination with anime and the hair colors they use is just more evidence...;o) It's a colorful new world! Enjoy it while it lasts...as long as most "fads" have over the past 50 years...;o) And I have to wonder if there isn't as many or more young men shaving their heads as there is girls coloring their hair to match their outfits..lol Maybe you have some input on that, Mr "not so young anymore"...LOL ;o)
Saturday, September 27th, 2014 on Presenting Amarna Miller
Totally agree. And please see my comment, below.
Sunday, May 18th, 2014 on Lily C
She seems to be a lot more uninhibited in the sets by Tony Murano and Luca Helios.
Wednesday, March 12th, 2014 on Indiana A
I don't think this is new material. MA has been known to store sets and release them months or years later.
I think the rating you are referring to should be blamed on the photographer, not the model... it is not that she has changed, but the one behind the camera has...
Sunday, December 1st, 2013 on Indiana A
Man, you truely are a FUCKING ASSHOLE!!!
First of all, this discussion is between Rylsky and me. I don't see why you have to stick your BIG NOSE in it. So here's my advice for you: MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS.
Second, you called me childish and on because what I wrote; but you on the other hand, are childish too. And why is that, 'cause you came here to defend this Rylsky guy like he is your best friend or something, a friend been "bullied" by me, then you felt the need to defend him like this is high school. Bullshit!, this is a softcore porn website(and we all here are adults not teenagers) not high school; so take your stupid knight in shining armor complex to elsewhere. As a matter of fact, this complex of yours it seems kind of a faggot thing, don't you think?
Finally, Where did you learn logic? in a bar? I bet you did, hahahahahahaha... You think you proved I contradicted myself? well, you're wrong; you didn't prove shit! And I think is better for you, to go back to school and finish it this time, obviously, you need it. Oh yeah, I almost forgot, take your regards and SHOVE IT UP YOUR ASS!!! that probably would like you.
Tuesday, November 26th, 2013 on Sharon D
theNUDE site can kiss my ass. AND YOU ARE A MORON!!!
Saturday, September 21st, 2013 on Red Fox
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.