Melena is - I think - the biggest pornstar who is regularly appearing on MetArt.
I totally respect her ambition. I love the fact that her pussy can get wet for a 'simple' nude shoot.
Sunday, July 9th, 2017 on Alnin
What about #69? Niemera laughing out loud.
Then I looked up what you exactly meant by 'BBP'. Could #56 be nominated? And what about #88? Or does that disqualify because we can see her face?
And what about #109 - #114? I admit, in #109 the focus is on Niemera's beautiful face and not on her creamy and oh so delicious butt, but compare #113 with #19. It's almost the same picture with this one important difference: in #113 Niemera's labia are swollen. Is it not a beautiful thing how a girl can get aroused by behaving so sexual in front of a camera? (And for us to enjoy and endorse it, of course.)
Sunday, July 9th, 2017 on Aleva
What a ride. I wish it didn't stop after pic 113!
Wednesday, June 28th, 2017 on Tourena
Helene's face is not my type.
Helene is a great and very talented nude model.
Both things make this set totally breathtaking. I don't care so much for models who look gorgeous but also distant and arrogant. I love it that MetArt publishes pictures of girls that are considered 'fat' by the fashion industry (Helene does of course not look fat at all. Au contraire: she looks very healthy and I love her feminine curves.)
But also: there are plenty of pics where I was thinking: 'Helene's face is far from perfect, but her vibe is so vivid, so sexy, so much fun!' (#22 is a great example of this).
The above may seem a bit insulting, but actually it's not. A model can't help having a perfect or not so perfect face, but having the courage to show your body and enjoy your sexuality in front of a camera is completely up to her. This is one of the things I love about MetArt. You have girls that are skinny, curved, big breasts, big labia, small breasts, small labia...
And I really have to congratulate photographer Tora Ness. With Siiri she also brought us a not so conventional set. I'd love to see totally weird, crazy girls taking their clothes off and having fun.
Saturday, June 24th, 2017 on Mirnati
When Leonardo teamed up Amelie B with Candice B in 'Candys', I really felt the chemistry between the two girls.
Here, there's really a lack of chemistry and a lack of storytelling. Take a look at #11 for example. Both girls seem to think: "Why is he taking a photograph at this precise moment?"
When you're doing a multiple model shoot, I feel like there should always be a story. In 'Candys' the story was: 'two friends are in a public hallway and they dare each other to get naked and do some (soft) lesbian experiments'. Here the story is: 'two girls (are they friends, lovers?) are in a bedroom and they get naked because the photographer asks them to'.
Whenever you have the chance to play with stereotypes, you should do so in pornographic nude posing (a lot of people seem not a ease with the term 'ponographic', but to me 'porn' is not a pejorative term, it's just all media produced to get the audience to masturbate).
By the above I mean you can enforce AND debunk stereotypes. When applied to this shoot: you might as well have a shoot where Amelie B guides the newcomer towards nudity and lesbian experimentation as visa versa.
(The latter one might actually be kinda funny: giving Amelie B an attitude like: "Wait a minute, I'm the experienced nude model here. Why are you telling me things like: 'Don't be shy'?")
A last pic that illustrates what's wrong with this set: #118.
Marca is pretending to fuck Amelie doggy-style. Fine by me, but shouldn't they have to enjoy this? They're both looking at the camera as if they are soo bored. It's not even arrogance or provocation. It's as if Amelie and Marca are doing a rehearsal for a lesbian movie (just to get camera-angle, lights and poses right) and because rehearsals are so boring, they decided to get naked (altough for a rehearsal there's no need to do so).
I do love multiple model shoots and hope to see many more in the future. But this one was rather disappointing.
Saturday, June 24th, 2017 on Presenting Marca
Hey Fireball (of Paul),
I like all this talk about masturbation. I've read your excellent comment on Ulia.
It's actually very strange. On gallery 'Smora' I wrote: "Altea B and Iveta B were responsible for many of my orgasms since 2006. " To which Bikeman4 responded with: "tmi Vic..."
This prudence regarding masturbation is very strange. I just wrote a long comment on Zelda B with my pants on - and they are also on right now - but they will go off so that I can grab that little penis of mine while looking at naked girls.
It can be fun to just look at naked girls without removing any piece of clothing yourself, but in the end it's just torture and the desire to cum just becomes too great.
And all of this can be done without looking down on women or other guys who love jerking off while looking at naked girls - just like you do.
Saturday, June 17th, 2017 on Onize
The latest set – Saleda – features a totally different Zelda than the one we saw in Castera. I could talk about how Zelda is cute and adorable in so many ways, but let’s talk about how MetArt (and their photographers and models) should provide us with more information.
Saleda and Castera are shot by two different photographers (Rylsky and Arkisi respectively). But the one before Castera – Drecaz – is shot again by Rylsky.
If we compare these two shoots, we’ll notice that Zelda has the same haircut and tan, but her attitude is totally different. I’m going to take two pics to illustrate my point. #76 from Drecaz and #91 from Saleda.
The Drecaz-pic features a Zelda who is almost sarcastic. Resting on her knees and elbows she lifts her ass up and looks at us with an expression that tells us: “So, you still can’t get enough of my bare ass, can you? You dirty wanker.”
I love it. Zelda is an experienced model who has shown us her magnificent body dozens of times, so it makes so much sense to ask us this rhetorical question. Her self-awareness is – at least to me – very arousing.
Then we have the Saleda-pic. This set comes two months after Drecaz. Zelda lifts her ass up in the sky and she looks at us while…
Well, you could call it smiling, but that’s not so very accurate – she’s giggling.
Giggling like a schoolgirl.
Is this bad? No, I love it. Pics like these cause members, myself included, to actually fall in love with Zelda. But we need to think: why is she giggling? Is she thinking about a joke? Has Rylsky just told her something hilarious? Or could it be that she’s actually giggling BECAUSE she’s naked and she knows that both her anus and labia are fully exposed?
If you’re doing a nude shoot for the first time and the photographer asks you to take this particular and very explicit position, it is quite logical that you start to giggle. I mean: before the shoot you’re nervous because you are going to be naked in front of a photographer (and possibly a small crew). When naked in front of the photographer, you’re nervous because you know he’s going to ask you to spread your legs, to take positions that expose your anus.
So when that moment comes, it makes so much sense that all this pressure on your belly will suddenly disappear. You feel such a relief, that you can’t help yourself: you start to giggle. Instead of feeling nervous, you feel naughty.
All of the above can be scripted. The point is: we don’t know. Are we looking at an early shoot where Zelda started to giggle because she was so nervous (and so relieved)? Or are we looking at an experienced Zelda who knows exactly what to do to drives us crazy?
This is what’s lacking at MetArt. The introduction on top of the gallery just tells us she’s going to get naked and spread her legs – not really a surprise for a nude site.
But what I’d like to know is: when was this shot? My guess is MetArt does not reveal this information because it looks bad when you post a set that is actually four years old. Well, I don’t think this is the case. As a matter of fact: I think it’s just the opposite.
Imagine MetArt functioning more like a magazine (instead of ‘just’ a site). Imagine they would announce the first nude pics of Zelda one month ahead. Imagine they would do that for almost every successful model. Imagine that you would have the opportunity to order the galleries of one model in a truly historical order.
It’s just an idea.
Saturday, June 17th, 2017 on Zelda B
Oh God, so perfect.
Suzanna radiates her sparkling sexuality in every single photograph. She's just so powerful.
Sunday, May 21st, 2017 on Combita
Albert: I think your sepia-tone made the model's skin color very beautiful.
Landelinn: It might have taken you a while, but the moment you started taking off your clothes, I was hypnotized. You pose with a lot of style. Very Audrey Hepburn-like.
So don't let this low score fool you. I think you're very talented and hope to see much more from you!
Sunday, May 14th, 2017 on Presenting Landelinn
The comments on Nika are very strange to me. Her smiles drive me crazy. If a girl is enjoying her nudity and loves spreading her legs to get herself and the viewers aroused, is that not a wonderful thing in itself?
I agree that there are other girls who are more sexual provocative. The "So, you like looking at my vagina, don't you punk?"-types, and I may like them as well... as long as they can combine this attitude with the "I'm the sweetest girl in the world"-look that Nika has plenty of.
But don't underestimate her on the field of pure sexual provocation. If you see through the smiles, you'll notice her happiness is not replacing her arousal, it's energizing it.
So Nika O and Koenaert: I think you're both doing a terrific job!
Saturday, May 6th, 2017 on Nika O
Margot is soo sweet. Her pics make me hard and soft at the same time.
This set is not the best, but I think there's much potential in both the model and the photographer.
Thursday, April 27th, 2017 on Presenting Margot Reese
It's a hobby.
That's a strange remark and you're not the first one who has said this about Zelda.
It's not so much that I disagree, it's really about not understanding. First of all: a model that always poses in more or less the same mood, is not necessary lacking any talent in modelling. Girls like Anna S and Angelika D can show you that. (Anna S knows how to look serious and dreamlike. That's it. She's amazing, go watch her pics if you don't believe me.)
But Zelda... If your argument is that it's not professional for a model to shift between moods, I could follow. But your argument is that "[she has] always the same expression frozen on her face".
I'll admit that girls like Norma A or Iveta B express a wider range of emotions than Zelda, but she knows damn well how to 'play' with her audience. She exploits - very consciously it seems - the fact that she can so very cute.
I could follow a critique like: "She's drawing the innocent but naughty teenager-routine again." I like that - I think she's very good at it, but opinions can differ.
Wednesday, April 19th, 2017 on Drecaz
Oh my God, what an enthusiasm!
And I love it when her labia seem to form an 8.
Friday, April 14th, 2017 on Presenting Sarah Kay
Ooh, Berenice. There's no stopping you in looking gorgeous and joyous with an overdose of cuteness and style. This variation of 'femme fatale' versus 'cute naughty schoolgirl' never gets old.
Sunday, April 9th, 2017 on Reale
Yes, that's quite an amazing pic. Both sexually as artistically a tour de force!
Sunday, March 26th, 2017 on Tremna
Nataly knows how to be cute.
Sunday, March 26th, 2017 on Private Show
Way too short. This should have been going on for at least 20 pics more.
Tuesday, March 14th, 2017 on Wilena
Explicit nude sites like MetArt are generally concerned to lack ethics because they would encourage the (male) viewer/member to look down on women.
Then you scroll down to the comment section. Mostly the comment-section of a (in my case mostly Belgian) news site is a depressing experience. At MetArt it is not. Why is this?
I think this is because of three things:
1. You have to pay for the site. You’re not going to pay for a site if you’re cynical about its content.
2. The site is about nude women.
3. Most of the members – especially those who comment – are mild-mannered rather shy men.
The third point is of course an assumption, but I think it’s very true. Macho-men have no problem to have a conversation about a girl having ‘a great ass’. At that point the shy, mild-mannered guy realizes that the macho is not so much having a conversation about how a girl looks, but much more about how he – being an Alpha male – could very easily seduce and ‘bang’ a certain girl. In other words: the conversation is not about a girl, it’s about himself.
The shy guy would love a conversation about how a (naked) girl looks. He does not care so much about how he could ‘bang’ the girl, no he would truly love to talk about how great, how cute, how amazingly beautiful a naked girl can be.
The very idea that you can simply talk about what female nudity does to you, without having to act ‘cool’ or ‘macho-male’ is actually quite heartwarming and liberating.
Take your top-rated comment on NYSTRA for example. In this you state three things:
1. It’s up to the girl to pose with or without pubic hair.
2. You like both.
3. ‘Sanita is a real beauty’.
It’s a strange fact that a real-life conversation about the above between colleagues at work is nearly impossible, while a conversation with an Alpha male about him dating a woman who turned out to be ‘fat’ or ‘ugly’ is very well possible. Keep in mind: the first one is impossible, but ethical, the second one is way more probable, but no so ethical.
In a mad world MetArt can be a safe harbor.
Sunday, March 5th, 2017 on Castene
I do not really get this comment. Do you have something against bathroom-shoots, against exposure of the anus, or is it just the combination that bothers you?
It can't be the latter one because Emmy never reveals her a-hole in this set. So the 'anally-fixated?' is not very relevant.
The 'girl taking a shower' or 'girl in bathtub'-theme is not very original, but a site like MetArt - tough staff-members may deny this - is not really about originality. There's a reason why we get a combination of mainly the following locations: bedrooms, bathrooms, forrests (and nature), abstract (no recognizable background), vacation-locations (beach, swimming pool) and (more or less) surreal locations - by which I mean: a conference room, a factory hall... Any location where you would absolutely NOT expect a naked girl to appear.
This variety of locations is done because, besides the obvious sexual arousal, nudity serves a lot of other feelings as well. Freedom for example is better expressed in nature or a vacation-location with much of wide open space.
A set like this one is way more domestic. This set is no so much about Freud and potty training, as it is simply about the idea that Emmy would not mind if you caught her while she's about to take a bath. This is about girlfriend-like behaviour - as so many other sets on MetArt.
Sunday, March 5th, 2017 on Nilesse
I watch the galleries always in Medium size on a full hd-monitor without resizing the pics. This means a pic like #69 starts with Suzanna's lovely feet and then I get to scroll down letting her legs lead towards her pussy and anus.
Suzanna always gives quite a show, and this set is certainly not an exception. Yet I feel like a bit more nudity would have made the set a lot better.
I very much like how it starts - yes, beneath these 'ordinary' clothes there is one sexy lady.
Then there is this very ironic 'I don't know what to wear'-scene. Great!
But the underwear...
Let me put it this way: I think #94 (bare buttocks) is way more beautiful then #93 (buttocks in underwear). I'm like completely hypnotized by the sight of her asshole in #94.
Yes, I'm still a fan of ANATT
Tuesday, February 28th, 2017 on Dyvatum
"Lack of chemistry" and - of course - low ratings.
I actually think this set is quite good. What is represents to me is the erotic exploration that starts when people hit puberty. At that age a lot of people have someone of their own gender to experiment with - at least I had one.
Tough both Mia and Michelle are well above that age, it's really about that innocence. You're curious about how the other one looks like underneath her clothes, but when you're both naked on the bed, you don't really know how to continue. This set catches that atmosphere.
But, of course, I might be wrong and there is "no chemistry" at all.
Sunday, February 19th, 2017 on Marli
The first great pic is #11. Like Berenice is meditating with her buttocks bare. This continues in #12. (OMG, her ass looks so delicious!)
A pic like #16 would look ‘nice’ with other models. But Berenice adds a touch of mystery in both her hand resting on her leg and her facial expression. This also continues in #17 where she looks like she’s controlling your mind – “I put a spell on you”.
#26 is also quite gorgeous with very nice light on both her buttocks. Because her face is hidden – in combinations with the blue water – there’s also a sense of mystique in this shot. This continues in #27 and #28.
#30 completely denies the previous ‘witchy’ mood. This is not a young witch, just a joyous girl.
And then comes #31. As if Berenice is seeing the world’s cutest puppy.
Berenice is constantly bringing new moods. Joyous, glamourous, totally serious, mysterious… (What to make of #50?) And a lot of times – like in #47 – presented with a nice sense of irony – “I’m just a naked girl, guys!”
And Rylsky? Well instead of always going for the most explicit shots, he also has pics like #56 - #59 where Berenice’s skin is quite a contrast with all the blues in the water.
From #70 on I have the feeling the set loses track. Most of these pics would have worked a lot better if there were multiple models swimming and playing in the pool.
A last favorite: #104. I love pics that have a ‘making of’-feel about them. It also shows how comfortable Berenice is with her nudity.
Berenice seems to love posing nude, that’s what makes her such a great model.
Monday, February 13th, 2017 on Plida
Nice words, Checkers. Zelda spreads happiness.
Sunday, February 12th, 2017 on Seva
I enjoyed this set a lot. Zelda is nude from start to finish and you never get enough of her. Actually when I was halfway through the set, I was thinking I was near the end. This is because Zelda knows how to play the game of seduction. Tough each pic features a naked Zelda - not one pic is exactly the same. So when seeing 50 pics, it actually feels like you've seen 100.
So Zelda, one last request: keep enjoying your nudity in front of a camera when you turn 28, 29, 30...
As Rose said: what a personality!
It's just so grand how Pammie poses. She's so devoted to her nudity while she's also very relaxed and enjoyed. #65 says it all.
Friday, February 10th, 2017 on Tamoi
Oh yes, that is so right!
As with so many girl/girl-sets, this one also gets an underrated score from most members.
I guess this has to do with the lack of explicit shots and not realizing that you are looking at two girls who have great chemistry together and show so, so much enthusiasm.
It's such a great thing seeing two girls have so much fun in front of a camera. You have to wonder: would they act so crazy if their clothes stayed on? Probably not. It's their nudity that gets them so turned on.
Wednesday, January 25th, 2017 on Candys
Thank you. Kindness and horniness go very well together, don't you think?
Tuesday, December 27th, 2016 on Rituna
Thank you Roger.
Tuesday, December 27th, 2016 on Dreaming
First of all: Merry Christmas...
...to all the girls who have the guts to pose without clothes
...to all the photographers who capture their beauty, arousal and playful naughtiness
...to all the members who enjoy their beauty, arousal and playful naughtiness
I'm always moved by the idea that people are not selfish. I know that money plays a big part in the girls' decission to show themselves naked, but I always hope there are two more reasons:
1. They're excited about posing naked - and they have been dreaming of doing this at least a few months prior to their first shoot.
2. They like the idea that men (and a few women) will get aroused by seeing their nude bodies.
To me, seeing a girl unclothed and completely devoted to her nudity, does not just arouse me; It unlocks feelings of tenderness and devotion towards the nude young woman. I'm sure I'm not the only member who feels that way.
And it never gets old. This generation of MetArt-girls follows the previous one, and right now some girls in highschool are thinking: when I'm 18, those MetArt-members won't believe their eyes.
One last fantasy: Imagine a girl posing naked in 1995 for a few magazines. She stops posing, get's a regular job and also a bayy-girl in 1997. Now in 2016 this 19yo girl finds out her own mother did some nude posing in the 90's. She's not shocked. Au contraire: she wants to do get naked herself. And so she does: for MetArt.
The fantasy above must be true in some cases, don't you think?
Sunday, December 25th, 2016 on Nyella
Sunday, December 25th, 2016 on Dreaming
Sunday, December 25th, 2016 on Lecioti
Sunday, December 25th, 2016 on Rituna
So Red Fox is actually Michelle H. That's nice to know.
I really like how Eselda looks. I like how vulnerable she is. I also think Red Fox is quite a sensitive photographer.
Like in #49 where Eselda seems to be saying: "I know. It's not enough. I need to take ALL my clothes off, right?"
And then there is this great sequence that starts with #54. You can really tell Eselda is just so nervous while she starts lowering her pants. In #56 she's smiling, but it doesn't feel really genuine. And so our emphatic photographers suggests: "Don't worry, I'm gonna go closer with the camera so you don't have to smile if you don't want to."
It results into #57 - #59 which are in my humble opinion very sensitive shots of this moment where Eselda takes her pants off.
And so in #60 we see Eselda naked for the first time. And you really have this idea as if the photographer is telling her: "It's okay. Take your time. You don't have to pose very explicit right away."
And slowly and gently Eselda is guided to reveal what's between her legs and even - I actually did not expect this - her anus in #111. (And a great follow-up in #113. It looks like Eselda is quite relieved now that the 'anal shots' have been taken.
I really hope to see Eselda again. She might have been scared, but maybe it was also quite a thrill.
Thursday, December 22nd, 2016 on Presenting Eselda
I agree. I actually think that this was the gallery that put Suzanna on my radar.
I think she's perfectly cast as a nude amazone. This actually is my only point of cirtique: there are not that many pictures of Suzanna riding the horse completely naked. I also think the shots in the end would've been a lot more powerful with a fully nude Suzanna.
Most comments on this set are - contrary to your view - quite positive. The rating however is not so great. I don't know what counts most for MetArt. The rating, the amount of views, the amount of comments? Right now the amount of views is 47212 with 49 comments (excluding this one). I'm curious to see what these numbers will be in a couple of months.
Monday, December 19th, 2016 on Miosu
Even after 5 days, Zelda still gets all the praise.
Monday, December 19th, 2016 on Zaluda
It's always rather touchy when you read the comments on a Zelda-gallery. Her fans really love her, and yes Eventider234, there is reason why they made her THE face of MetArt.
A lot of things are great about Zelda, but let me pick my favorite moment in this set.
It starts with #99: Zelda seems to ask you: "So you're curious about how I do look BETWEEN my buttocks, are you?"
#100: "ARE YOU?"
#101: Zelda faking as if she's not entirely sure if she would reveal her anus or not. (Tough, we've seen it already dozens of time in this shoot alone.)
#102: - 104: Building tension.
#105: Oh, Zelda, have mercy upon us.
#106: Yes, there's beauty in Zelda's face. But there's also beauty in this pic: that butt-crack leading up to her anus. She truly has jewels between buttocks and legs (and she knows it)
#107: (with irony in her voice) "Was that interesting?" - But also: aah, what a great pic this is.
So yeah, I'm quite the Zelda-fan. (I mean, just look at #110 and tell me that's not adorable.)
Saturday, December 17th, 2016 on Zaluda
I was wondering the same thing. On indexxx.com it appears Rozi has done six nude shoots, the last one being Ploide.
My guess is Rozi is one of so many girls who decided one summer (in 2014) to pursue this 'crazy' idea of posing nude. Now that this is off her bucket list, we'll probably never see her again.
Sunday, December 11th, 2016 on Rozi
The strangest thin is: Loreen always disappears (or appears out of nowhere) in a duo shoot.
In her shoot with Astrud (Cludue) she's suddenly gone after pic 90.
The two girl photoshoot for EB ('Mermaids') mentioned in the blog is even more bizarre. It starts with Loreen and Luciana sitting on a bench - both girls are dressed and Loreen is checking her smartphone. In pic 2 we're inside with Luciana and Loreen is nowhere to be found.
This stays this way until Loreen appears like a ghost (truly like a ghost) in #34. This pic feels very surreal. Next (#35) comes a very traditional open-legs-shot where both girls show off, and... Loreen disappears again.
However in #134 she's together with Luciana at the beach. Both girls are naked and it's great to see their different body-types as they walk in the wet sand and have fun.
But in the last shot (#163) they're both dressed, indoors, and seem totally ready for some lesbian action.
The thing is: I like the duo shoots with Loreen, but they seem totally unfinished.
Wednesday, December 7th, 2016 on The MetArt 50+ Club: Loreen A
Some people don't like ANATT-shoots (All Nude All The Time), but this is a great example of how you can have a perfect set-up and payoff without using any clothes (with the exception of the stockings, of course).
And Emmy: the way you smile and behave in front of the camera, it's heartwarming. People who are very biased towards sites like these, should scroll through the comment-section. They'll find out that most members will not just express their sexual arousal, but also their tenderness and respect towards the nude girls they admire.
Saturday, December 3rd, 2016 on Sarjin
Nice words, Randycat. I feel the same way.
Thanks, your comment made me look for Jewel again.
Although I feel like Lena looks rather like Jeff Milton.
Monday, November 21st, 2016 on Amroy
Raena has a strong resemblance with Iveta B - both in style as in beauty.
In #24 it seems as if Raena is already naked.
#98: What a great smile.
And those erected nipples are evidence we're seeing a girl who loves showing her body.
Sunday, November 20th, 2016 on Yaneji
Jenny looks like the nicest girl with a dirty mind. I love it!
Friday, November 11th, 2016 on Presenting Jenny
Yes, I love that 4th pic as well. The towel "accidentally" drops and reveals her gorgeous buttocks. I don't think Suzanna minded all that much.
Saturday, November 5th, 2016 on Rodna
I would love to see Rose doing an interview with Heidi. She already had 15 years in which she could decide to go nude in front of a photographer.
There are three explanations:
-She wanted to do this for a long time, but never dared to do it.
-She never wanted to be a nude model, until a month ago.
-Something between the two previous options.
Seriously tough: I love the fact that there is no age-limit on MetArt. Even a 40yo woman would turn into a girl when she's feeling like: "Oh my God, I'm standing naked in front of a photographer and I'm loving it!"
Saturday, November 5th, 2016 on Presenting Heidi Hawley
You're so right. So many women look great past 30.
Underneath even the most urban, regular outfit any sexy girl is a naked sexy girl.
Most Met-models would do this striptease exactly the same: with a great sense of irony. I mean, just look at the Updates-screen: there's female nudity everywhere. So there's this silent agreement between model and viewer: "Just pretend you're gonna be surprised when I go COMPLETELY naked."
Still it's rather strange. In a way seeing a nude model in casual clothes feels more private, more 'behind the scenes' than seeing her naked. Yet I just love a naked Pammie Lee.
Tuesday, October 18th, 2016 on Fulizea
Morgan seems like a funny girl who has a lot of fun.
It's almost as if she is a comedian who decides to pose nude. That would be a great combination by the way: a girl who combines stand-up comedy with nude modelling.
Saturday, October 15th, 2016 on Maxina
It's very seldom you see a girl with such a perfect body as Zelda. In the summary it is described as 'she prefers it when her lingerie doesn't hide her best assets'.
You can't keep looking at Zelda and 'her best assets' without being aroused to the third degree. I hope to see much more of her (and I have already seen so much of her).
Friday, October 7th, 2016 on Nidea
Vanessa doesn't reveal much about herself, but that's very ok. What strikes me is what a 'regular' person she is. I don't mean this as a negative thing. You don't need an extra-ordinary sexdrive to pose nude. Nude models and porngirls are just people who want to be happy and loved.
Friday, October 7th, 2016 on Shy MetArt beauty Vanessa Angel opens up!
Callista licks herself in #107 - #109.
By doing this she really turns herself into an animal. This mostly counts for #107. The idea op portraying people like animals, may seem degrading but here it totally fits the picture. In a way all girls show their animal side on MetArt and it's our animal instinct that makes it such a fantastic experience to witness their nudity.
But Callista is a cultural and intellectual being as well. And tough you can describe nude pics like these as 'dirty', 'nasty' or 'naughty', you could also describe them as 'innocent'. By which I mean: being sexually provocative without inhibitions. But while Callista does this, she's also very aware that she looks gorgeous.
Thursday, September 22nd, 2016 on Huyia
To boldly go naked where others have gone clothed.
I love this nude exploration-set. Tough based on the overall appreciation, I don't think we'll get much sequels.
Saturday, September 10th, 2016 on Harteny
I just love the idea of three girls getting together, getting naked, getting very aroused and sexual and NOT having sex.
Instead you get this very playful and happy threesome having fun. These pictures are pure promotional material for MetArt. Sure the girls are all beautiful and naked, but they are also full of life and joy.
And Emily Bloom: you're not only a great model, but also a great person. For those who do not know that: just check her twitter account. I have nothing but admiration for her.
Saturday, September 10th, 2016 on Karedi
Yes, Knackers, you're absolutely right. I too want more multiple models sets.
Maybe you didn't notice, but there's also a naked Noreen in every pic.
Sunday, August 21st, 2016 on Riaya
No it's not.
Clothes and story are not correlated. The latest set where I was fascinated with a potential story, was Rostina starring Callista B. When you look at it, it's almost like a nude scary movie. On Callista's model page I did a review of the gallery (as a part of a review of her performances, because she's one of my favorite models).
In Rostina Callista is naked from start to finish. There's not really a story - at MetArt there are only hints of a story - but Callista's act is really convincing.
I made a long comment on Sepera, starring Suzanna A about how I feel about clothes on a nude site. If you're talking about a story, a synopsis like: 'For no logical reason at all a young girl takes off all her clothes ans smiles a lot' is not a better synopsis than: 'For no logical reason at all a girl is naked in the forest and smiles a lot.'
So, to me, I don't seek a story, but I like it if a gallery has a distinct mood and both model and photographer play with that mood.
Clothes: see Sepera.
But what's most important to me is to see a proud and happy girl who's very exited to share her nudity with us. Even if she's not naked from the start.
Friday, August 19th, 2016 on Florald
Aaah, oh Norma.
Ezyj managed to fall asleep during your set. I did not.
I did not because of a picture like #11. I see a girl who takes great pleasure in presenting her pussy (with curly labia) and anus like it's something to be proud of and not ashamed.
I did not because in #24 your eyes are just hypnotizing me: "Look at my face, now look at my body, look at my face..."
And those are just two examples. Norma A is full of life and lust. A very talented model.
Thursday, August 18th, 2016 on Florald
Well, I learned a new word today. Can't get enough of ANATT.
With more confidence than ever Callista is naked once again.
I can agree with all the comments here. Callista is as cute as she is full of style and charm, and I think she is funny as well.
Thursday, August 4th, 2016 on Vamono
Great gallery. Completely in a "I'm not a girl, not yet a woman"-mood.
Sunday, July 31st, 2016 on Semio
I’ve already mentioned in the past – as VictorDj2 - how I like girls that pose naked from start to finish. In general I don’t like it if it takes 60 pics before the ‘nude’-model finally drops her pants
I feel very ambiguous when it comes to clothes on a nude site. I must admit that, if a girl is wearing only a sweater during most pics of the gallery, it’s sometimes shocking (in a good way) to see her suddenly completely naked – an effect you would not have is she was naked from the start.
In case of the above: it’s not just the breasts or the nipples – usually she has lifted her sweater a couple of times before she took it off – but it’s the idea: you go from wearing something to absolutely nothing. It’s an experience we all know. I can go around in my bedroom just wearing a t-shirt. The moment I take it off… it just feels different. Being completely naked feels more like true liberty, than wearing something. This is my main reason why I love it when a girl is naked from start to finish.
In case of this gallery: the clothes don’t hide Suzanna’s body from us. As such the dress becomes more an attribute (like her earrings) than a piece of clothing.
And just to make sure: I think Suzanna looks delicious in that dress. And yes, because the dress is an attribute, a sexual attribute, it increases my arousal.
The latter part is more psychological than it is photographical. Suzanna knows that the dress itself will arouse the audience. Read this right: it’s not (just) the process of Suzanna taking the dress off, it’s the dress itself that is very purposely making us horny.
The dress expresses sexuality, not liberty. This is not a contradiction. If a girl takes all her clothes off at a nude-beach and runs into the sea, she’s way much more enjoying her liberty than her sexuality. On the other hand: putting on a dress that reveals everything is just saying: I’m a sexual person. One could have sex with Suzanna without her even lifting that dress up. From as soon as Suzanna is wearing that dress, her nudity only serves her sexuality. (If Suzanna would be naked from the beginning the tone could always be: ‘a day in the life of a nudist’ – a lot of MetArt galleries do start like this btw.)
Nudity that only serves sexuality is not bad thing. It’s the main reason why we are members. If no-one would get aroused by the sight of naked girls, MetArt would be out of business.
Saturday, July 30th, 2016 on Sepera
Mikana keeps on looking sweet, pure and innocent. A girl with both a cute body and face
Wednesday, July 27th, 2016 on Govore
Totally agree with the smiling driving you crazy cuz I'm the same. It totally ruins photo sets and that's the main reason why I hate Arkisi, that guy is such garbage but everybody loves him for some reason.
Wednesday, November 22nd, 2017 on Nika O
Very smart thoughts Victor... I also like chronology and there are quite a lot model sets where this is lacking. Out of my little experience with model photography I also would like more information like where the set was made and at what time ... not much but something.
Friday, August 4th, 2017 on Zelda B
Hello VictorDj3, of course the face of a girl is always important and also for me the most important at all on a person. But the BBP´s (Best Butt Photos) have nothing to do with it. The BBP is only the award of good photos of beautiful butts. The most beautiful daily photo of a butt gets then the BBP. Sure, there are many more perfect photos of models, faces, breasts, pussies, feet or butts. And surely everyone has their own taste. The whole thing should only be fun.
Monday, July 10th, 2017 on Aleva
Storyline: Girlfriends from school, getting together for a long weekend. Opening scene, both fully clothed, looking out the window at the pool. You can tell one is a visitor because of the overnight bag. They decide to change for the pool, multiple shots of each undressing, some shots with both models, at least one shot of them both bending over showing off their assets side by side. Maybe stepping out of their panties, into their bikini bottoms. The guest is putting on her top, the resident is in the background and looks in the overnight to find a double-headed dildo... Oh wait, that's a scene from a site that does lesbian sets.
Two model sets are great, when they aren't pseudo-lesbian sets. Either do two model sets, or lesbian sets, this in between stuff? Personally, I have to agree, it kind of sucks.
I agree. Both these ladies are lovely and look wonderful, but the chemistry is off. Marca looks like she was the one who was more into the shoot. I love the hungry look on her face as she's checking out Amelie.
Some good points. I agree this was disappointing as a G-G set.
I've had the TMI quote posted as a reply to my comments before, I guess not everyone is so at ease discussing masturbation like me and probably still consider it a taboo subject. It wasn't until when I was a teenager and I dated an older woman in her twenties and she used to make me masturbate in front of her before we had sex that I realized how natural it was and women knew full well what we men like to get up to.
You must be like me a long time MetArt member as you have mentioned two of my favourite girls from the past in Iveta B who is just plain all round gorgeous and Altea B who up until the arrival of Dominika A had the largest Labia I had ever seen and no prizes for guessing that I’ve had many a good old masturbating session over all three beautiful ladies. Altea also has such cute sexy toes and I always fantasize that I am kissing and sucking them whilst masturbating to her sets and when she is wearing opened toed stilettos I masturbate even harder.
So thank you for jogging my mind as far as Altea B is concerned and reminding of one of my favourite girls from the past who’s galleries I haven’t looked at for a while, so just had a quick look at my Altea B folder and have very quickly decided that I need a pretty serious Altea B masturbating session right away and at least a few more in the up and cuming days.
Sunday, June 18th, 2017 on Onize
I totally agree with you Sir, I enjoy looking at the beautiful girls on MetArt and I certainly would never look down on them, nude modeling is what they do for a living and they do their job very well.
I also like looking at the girls on MetArt whilst keeping my clothes on in a non masturbating situation, though this does tend to be when I'm viewing the galleries on my mobile phone during tea breaks at work as I firmly believe taking ones penis in hand and masturbating during working time goes against company policy, although having said that, I must admit that I haven't seen a current copy of the company regulations. : )
And cost effective and plenty of fun. Have a great day Sir.
Monday, May 1st, 2017 on Presenting Margot Reese
Hi VictorDj3, I realy hope to satisfy you more with my next works!
Saturday, April 29th, 2017 on Presenting Margot Reese
You´re all mixed up and confused,dude.
A well educated gentleman,a smart fair-player has nothing to do with "shyness",or "mild manners",and does not preclude the possibility of being what you call an alpha male.
Conversely,a bad mannered,agressive and uneducated guy has nothing to do with being an alpha male and succeed with women,and does not preclude the possibility of being a frustrated,lonely man.A loser.
The way a man behaves regarding "banging",depends on what his "object of desire"expects from him.This has changed extensively lately,and changes from one to another woman,age and situation.As long as you are flexible and adaptive,success increases.
If you´re still confused,you can come and I´ll be glad to give you some free lessons on the subject.The Seller
I think my friends would be surprised to hear that I'm shy and mild mannered. ;)
But you make a valid point. For the most part, the posters here treat the models as women, not just a collection of body parts to rate, and it makes the comment section an intelligent, thoughtful place to spend time. We're lucky to be a part of it.
I think a big part of that is the content itself and the way it's presented. The models here are treated with respect by the site, and the members who post seem to follow suit. There are exceptions, of course, but the MOAR PUSY LOL jackasses tend to disappear after a few posts.
Premium sites tend to attract premium people. I've been here a lonnnnnnng time, and I'm glad that other smart and clever people share my enthusiasm for the place.
I agree, mostly. Thanks.
The female form is beautiful. The models and photographers on ma are amazing. Thanks for the heads up about SANITA.
Thank you very much for the information and insight. I learned a lot about myself and my species.
You too Victor!!!
Monday, December 26th, 2016 on Dreaming
Offer not valid in conjunction with other discounts.Cannot accumulate thumbs up from your multiple iterations (refer to community guidelines).The retailer
I see what you mean, Victor... personally, what jazzes me about Morgan is that she's a girl who combines looking super-gorgeous with nude modeling. Now of course, if she's got a great sense of humor that don't hurt a dang thing! :D
Sunday, October 16th, 2016 on Maxina
Victor, check out Jan Vels's sets in the archives, he was very fond of this format. (:
Sunday, September 11th, 2016 on Harteny
Oh I think it is, what joy it would be 8)
Victor, I think you got caught on the word "story" and missed the important part of my comment.
For me, a good set is one that sets up a scenario that I can construct a fantasy around in my mind. For me, what that usually means is, just like in real life, seeing the girl in clothing or lingerie, first... and then the joy of seeing her (or helping her!) remove it.
Sometimes this can mean a set tells a story, as rudimentary as such need to be to fit in a 120 photo or 10 minute for video format.
Many times, however, it's not a story so much as a scenario.
See, for instance, Mr. Albert Varin's sets... many of which can be explained by the plot line "pretty young lady ~ for no logical reason at all ~ decides to get naked and have some naked fun time ~ with YOU" ~ I can play with that scenario in my mind all day long!
Saturday, August 20th, 2016 on Florald
Victor, I coined the term "All Naked All The Time" to highlight the distinction between sets that require planning, imagination, styling and work, vs. those that are easy to crank out one after another. Just move a model from set to set, location to location, and have her pose.
Some models are so good at posing you hardly even notice, but with most models, for me after awhile ANATT becomes downright boring.
What I like is when an artist collaborates with the model to come up with a story or scenario that we can flesh out in our minds and create a fun fantasy around. These sets generally include clothes and/or lingerie, styling, a set or location, and planning ahead and some hard work on the part of the artist as well as the model. But it pays off ~ IMO ~ far more often than do just plain ANATT sets.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.