This is one of the best - possibly THE best - galleries ever in MetArt..
Most of the time I masturbate while looking at the pictures. And so I reach to #110 and strangely enough I feel 'caught'. As if Iveta is trying to make me feel embarrassed saying: "Wait a minute. Are you jerking off while looking at me?" And then in #111 it feels as if she's amused by it. "You naughty boy."
A lot of girls on MetArt do (or try to do) the above. I can be amused by it, but with Iveta it just goes deeper. As if she's really in the room with you. That's her gift.
Wednesday, January 3rd, 2018 on Splendis
I really thought her first set was great. This one? It feels very unfinished and unfocused.
You also get a very weird atmosphere. The sequence starting from #83 is actually rather disturbing. It seems as if you're looking at a girl who's to weak to get out of bed, no matter how hard she tries.
To end with a positive note: the last two pics are kinda great. It would have been a much better set if Jerrica got out of the bed.
Thursday, December 28th, 2017 on Elidae
That's a great response, Rose!
- Christmas tree? Check.
- Naked lady in front of the tree? Check.
- Toothpaste smile? Check.
- But also a hint of irony in that smile? Check.
- Holding one leg high up in the sky so that she appears to be waving with her foot? Check.
- Exposing the deliciousness between her legs? Check.
- Exposing the cute little star between her buttocks? Check.
- Looking happy and confident a.k.a. showing proud in doing nude modelling? Check.
Outcome: perfect MetArt Christmas-card.
Merry Christmas dear models, members and photographers!
Monday, December 25th, 2017 on Hine
I like it when you share this information with us DG.
It's always interesting to read in what context these published galleries were created. It makes the models more 'human'. It's a very human thing to do: posing naked to arouse other people, and yet it is still considered as an act of craziness or - worse - sluttiness.
It's powerful to fight these stereotypes.
Thursday, December 21st, 2017 on Repima
Some people complain about the use of props or Suzanna smoking.
I'll admit that if Suzanna was smoking a cigarette, I would propably not endorse it, but this purple water pipe? Suzanna has always been a lady with a lot of style, the water pipe emphasizes her status of nude icon / sex symbol.
I'd agree with the remarks about the props if it wouldn't suit the naked girl. Not exactly the case here.
Tuesday, December 19th, 2017 on Ayanar
Thanks for the information.
I've looked up the pics from Nika on the toilet. They are very cute and arousing.
Thursday, December 14th, 2017 on Cilena
She could leave her hat on.
Seriously Nicole looks so cute with that hat.
Thursday, December 7th, 2017 on Chenna
Sarika and Ron Offlin keep on exploring. On 'Meari' - a gallery from august - I already wrote that it is both funny and arousing.
You wonder who's idea was it to put on that t-shirt? It would be great if that's a t-shirt Sarika actually wears (keep on dreaming).
But then: Sarika's birthday suit. Can you imagine Sarika going to a fashion agency and getting rejected because her ass and breasts are too big? Knowing that she's actually a very sexy lady and posing without clothes is way much more fun (as she proves time after time) - how hard could her decision have been to get deliciously naked in front of the camera?
Thursday, December 7th, 2017 on Eldya
Are you for real, dear MetArt-members? Based on 105 ratings (including my 10), Jerricka’s first set has now an average rating of 6.79. Again: are you for real?
Because I’m completely blown away by this set. Everything about it feels so honest and vulnerable. I do like it when women like Suzanna A or Berenice show tons of confidence while posing nude, but when I notice that a girl is really pushing through – because she’s a bit afraid and shy, but she REALLY wants to get naked and arouse other people – I feel so much admiration and tenderness towards the (first time) nude girl.
Of course it could all be an act, but if it’s an act, it’s done very convincing. Like in #48 where oh so very cute Jerricka is suddenly shy because of her breasts.
Or #103 where she sticks out her tongue. Trying to be tough. Then #104: “Oh my God, I just stuck out my tongue like a toddler and I’m also completely naked!”
Is this set perfect? No, maybe not. But you’re really seeing a victorious and strong girl here. I love how natural her body looks, I love how we get to witness how she discovers her own capabilities as a sexual actor. In one phrase: this is a beautiful set.
Is it art, as Fozzinsky said – and I’m glad that there are comments that praise this gallery. Well, for maybe the first time I feel like I’ve really taken a path together with the photographer and the model. So yeah, maybe it is art.
Wednesday, November 29th, 2017 on Presenting Jerricka
I don't know why people complain about the photo quality being too grainy. It's a perfectly valid choice for a photographer, but - most importantly - it hardly comes around on MetArt, so it's a nice change as far as I'm concerned.
I absolutely love this set. Right now I'm looking at #35 and the only thing that comes up my mind is: "Yeah, you go girl! Lift that ass up in the sky and feel alive!"
There's a small sequence I want to bring up here: #54 - #56. In the first two shots Carolina's body is not fully framed in the picture,. #54 is a medium-shot focusing on drinking ice tea. #55 is a close-up of the left nipple. Very important: in both shots the lace of her sweater is touching the nipple.
Then we get #56. Carolina is now fully nude and framed to just above the knees. The difference between 'almost naked' and the sensation of 'full nude' is perfectly captured in this sequence. It would not have worked this well, if the focus had not been on that lace touching the nipple.
Thursday, November 16th, 2017 on Olema
In general photographers tend to like photos with a shallow depth of field. This is understandable because - next to lightning - the depth of field is the way to "guide" your audience. In 49 the focus is on Naomi's labia, but indeed her feet, breasts and face are not blurred out - and it could very well be that Koenaert is not a fan of #49, exactly because of that.
I sometimes really like it if you get a sequence of the same framing where it's just the focus that shifts from the face, to the vagina, to the feet.
#113-118: I like that you put some thought into this. If you ask me: #110 is such a gorgeous and cute pic. You can't see Naomi's breasts in it, but this joy in her eyes because she knows we can see her sweet anus between those soft cheeks... Female nudity is just a wonderful thing to witness.
I really like comments that are about certain details. Keep up the words!
Wednesday, November 15th, 2017 on Edida
Paula Shy is a pornstar for more than five years now. She has been a very busy girl.
What I like about this set is how much Paula seems to love her job. She seems very strong and confident using her body to make progression in the world.
Sunday, November 12th, 2017 on Forese
That's an interesting remark.
Thanks to your comment, I've looked at her Presenting-gallery. Indeed, she is way more relaxed in that one.
One that especially strikes me as a debut-pic is #69. That smile and look on her face tell me: "Oh my God, I'm really doing this. I'm really posing nude!"
But, of course, one must consider that it could all be an act. There are for example some recent Zelda B-galleries where it seems as if she just started modelling.
Regardless, I think Lizette is a great model - a true lookalike of Ellen Page.
Saturday, November 11th, 2017 on Libue
The description - which is, as always, straight porn-talk - says that 'Giana thinks her ass is her best asset'.
Yet, in her bio we can read that she likes cooking and there's no mention of her ass at all.
The bio, as it turns out, is mostly some random detail a model wants to share with us that has nothing to do with sex, porn or even her own body. It's (almost) always about the fact that she is a human being who thinks about other stuff besides sex and getting naked.
The description is always porn-talk. When I still bought nude magazines, I was always delighted if the text contained phrases like: 'Giana thinks her ass is her best asset'. Somehow – tough I know it’s just made up – it increases my arousal to think that Giana really thinks that. If you leave out her thinking part and would just say: ‘Her ass is her best asset.’ - it would just be information.
Might Giana think that? Well, there are a lot of pics that show her anus, labia and ass-cheeks and indeed they look delicious. However, there is no indication that Giana thinks that herself. In both #62 and #77 she seems to be asking: “Is this okay?”
If you ask me: Giana looks just great in #89 – what a smile and a great pose! If she would have showed us her bare ass with THAT smile, I would have said: “This girl KNOWS how delicious she looks from behind.”
Now, just to share this memory with you, when I was fourteen a friend of my showed me a piece of a porn-magazine. I still remember the text: ‘Diana thinks it’s just so delicious to have a cock up her ass.’
My friend told me not to read it – like it wasn’t important – but to me, if done well, it really increases my arousal.
Friday, November 3rd, 2017 on Presenting Giana
One might see the comparison between a vagina and strawberries as a platitude, and I'm certainly not gonna say that this hasn't been done before, but...
Strawberries are pretty damn good looking fruit. The same counts for Kaleesy's (and so many other girls) pussy and anus. Yet, mainstream media and almost any politician (and especially those who see 'the male gaze' as the worst thing) would say that Fabrice should feel bad about taking photos of nude girls and focusing so much on their genitals.
Someone who takes pictures of strawberries and fruit salads without nude girls, will probably never have to use a pseudonym. But from as soon as you take nude pics for sexual arousal, the public eye will see you as a pervert worse than Harvey Weinstein.
Language has a lot to do with this. In the 80’s and 90’s ‘sex-symbol’ was a frequently used word (to describe Madonna for instance). Right now the word ‘sex-object’ is way more popular. The difference? The sex-symbol has a mind on her own, the sex-object does not.
Yet the difference is purely a matter of impugning motives.
To me a girl who is showing us her pussy and some strawberries as well, is not ‘just’ an object or a reason to look down on her.
It matters so much that she is actually a sexual being who might be confident (or have doubts) that her body and face will be able to arouse the audience.
Pictures that make you hungry for food, are never seen as immoral – tough they can make you fat.
Pictures that make you hungry for an orgasm, are still seen as a source of shame. But I think it’s a delight.
Wednesday, November 1st, 2017 on Caino
There's praise to be found concerning Estelle - and indeed, she looks gorgeous, and complaints about Rylsky's photos being inconsistent and at times overexposed.
Two years ago there was a set with Angelika D - Antese - in which DeeDee noticed that there was a clock in the background that told him that Paramov had shot the entire gallery in just 20 minutes.
I gave a long reaction to his comment which came down to: a) you have to work fast to keep the model in a certain mood ; b) it's not art, it's porn - maybe arty porn, but still porn; c) I don't use the term porn is a disrespectful way but the main purpose of these nude shoots is to make you masturbate.
This also applies to this shoot. Frankly, I don't care that #75 - #81 is clearly overexposed. What I see is a happy girl who feels very naughty because she's naked outdoors. As a photographer you have to shoot fast, because there might be people who may start to harass Estelle. You don't want the model to feel uncomfortable, so who cares that you would actually have to wait until the sun is hiding behind the clouds in order for her pale skin to contrast with the water?
About the inconsistency: I actually like that in a nude shoot. Who made the rule that if you're mainly shooting in front of an open window, you have to make ALL the photos in front of this window?
Much more than consistency, I like variety.
And Estelle: you look adorable. Your very first pic in this shoot got me hooked. You look like: "Boy, you sure like me walking her in the nude, but you have no idea where I'm going, do you?"
After that, you keep on looking like you're so aware of your own gorgeousness and you love to play around with that.
Monday, October 30th, 2017 on Hiere
The woman in the painting looks full of desire. It's both nice and funny to make Ulia compete with her - of course with her clothes off and her sexual power on.
Ulia seems completely self-aware, looks very confident, and is putting her capability to drive us crazy with her looks, body and genitals to the max. Ron is very lucky to work with such a talented model.
Thursday, October 26th, 2017 on Plama
Lorena B gives (again) a very strong performance.
She goes from 'schoolgirl going nude for the first time' to 'carreer woman on the phone' in one single shoot.
All of this with an attitude like: "Yes, I get to pose nude again!'
Thursday, October 19th, 2017 on Masena
Uh oh, when I saw Lizette's cover I thought: What a cute girl.
Now that I've seen the whole set: what a cute girl.
Tuesday, October 17th, 2017 on Presenting Lizette
I really like this set. Tough I must admit this might have to do a lot more with the story I invent with it.
Lorian and Shelly are both 24. From her bio we learn that Lorian (the brunette) wants to become a doctor. It takes a long study to achieve that, so this explains why she's still at university at the age of 24.
I find it very arousing to think about one girl convincing another to pose nude together. So either Lorian has pushed Shelly because she needs to finance her studies, or Shelly really wanted to pose with Lorian giving her an extra financial argument.
But money is not all that interesting as a primary motivation - we all need and do things for money.
The most arousing thing is how does one girl confess to another girl that she wants to pose nude. And not just nude, but sexually explicit nude.
"I know you're gonna think I'm crazy, but I really want to model for a, ehm... nude site."
"Really?" (Big smile, drops her head.)
"So, do you think I shouldn't do it?"
"No, it's not that. I am going to model myself and the photographer asked me if I could bring someone along."
"No, I'm not. I just didn't have the guts to ask you."
"Wouldn't it be weird? I mean, I like you as a friend, but I'm not, you know "into" girls."
"Look, I'm just thinking: it's gonna be a lot of fun."
Sunday, October 1st, 2017 on Presenting Lorian and Shelli
Lorian is the brunette.
Shelly is the blonde.
Vivian radiates in every picture. She knows how to tease and gives quite a performance.
I also like the cross around her neck. If you feel like your religion is part of your identity, you should be able to express that in a nude shoot. There's no need to assume that your sexuality must be in conflict with your religious beliefs.
On a broader level I believe sexuality transcends religion or ethnicity. When a beautiful girl decides to be so generous to let us look at her naked body, does it in any way matter what she believes or what the color of her skin is?
Vivian is happy and nude and I love her for it.
Saturday, September 30th, 2017 on Presenting Viviann
When I read it this morning, I clicked on the link to his profile page in the article. The next hour I was completely blown away by so many of his galleries.
Slastyonoff is a photographer who could really make his models shine because he could adapt his style to the model's personality. Where he was quite posh with Iveta B (presenting her on a gold plate), he could be very playful with others.
Speaking of Iveta B: if there ever was one photographer who could capture her beauty the best, it must have been Slastyonoff.
His style of shooting the models both very explicit and artistic (in poses, sets and color) has set a trademark for MetArt.
So thank you, Slastyonoff. May you rest in peace.
Friday, September 22nd, 2017 on A tribute to MetArt artist Slatyonoff
Sofia looks great naked. The red dress suits her well, but nothing beats that good old-fashioned birthday suit!
Monday, September 4th, 2017 on Presenting Sofia
Nothing but compliments for this proud younglady. I hope to see much more of her.
Take a pic like 101. She's so adorable in this pic. It seems as if in #100 she was not yet fully aware that her anus was visible, and now she is. That smile! A bit shy (so cute and vulnerable), but also so brave and full of confidence.
I read in your bio that you want to go in the clothing business. That's great, but please stay in the nude business just a bit longer.
Tuesday, August 15th, 2017 on Presenting Dakota
It's intersting to compare this set to the one of Caramel today.
While Caramel actually is a teen, she's presented as a young woman. (Most girls on MetArt are presented that way.)
Kate is actually 20, but she's going for the fullblown teenager-act. Of course: both her body and face look very young, but above that she poses like: "Ha, you didn't expect that from a cute innocent girl like me, did ya?"
She's so adorable. I'm curious to see whether she can keep that act if she would decide to be a nude model for, let's say, 5 years?
Sunday, August 6th, 2017 on Saneli
This is a great set for a number of reasons.
First they show Sarika as a girl next door (GND), out on the street where she's not even trying to be sexual.
Next this GND is put in a Victorian setting. She's wearing stockings, playing chess. Hes shoes are... well, they are high heels, but not the sexy kind. In other words: it's a full parody of the Victorian girl who's not allowed to show any sexuality.
Starting with #13 the idea that Sarika is not so very sexual, starts getting deconstructed. Of course Sarika gets naked, but she does it so playfully, so tongue in cheek - "You, know I'm not REALLY a Victorian girl" - that the whole set becomes as funny as it is arousing.
One of the things I like the most are the stockings. These type of stockings are used by women who want to hide imperfections on their legs. Sarika's legs are perfect. There's absolutely no reason why she would wear those stockings. As a result she starts masturbating with them - they are more useful that way.
Again: both funny and arousing.
Saturday, August 5th, 2017 on Meari
Through her nudity and sexuality Berenice enjoys the experiment of making some very dazzling pictures where gravity seems upside down.
Berenice, while you look absolutely delicious, what sets you apart is this true feeling of freedom. With most models on MetArt you get the feeling they like the nude posing, with you it feels like a nude lifestyle. Take #120 for example: "Why should I wear pants, when my bum looks better uncovered?"
Wednesday, July 26th, 2017 on Ranice
Zelda B was, together with Norma A, one of the reasons why I became a member back in 2014.
Zelda B is pure nude magic. It’s not just sexual arousal, she has the talent to grab your attention from the first pic to the last. Already in her first gallery she’s very confident about her body and her sexuality. You can tell she enjoys the act of innocence as much as the act of seduction.
And so, seeing her naked is actually quite emotional for me. You see someone exploiting and enjoying her talent in posing nude. It’s heartwarming.
Friday, July 21st, 2017 on The MetArt 50+ Club: Zelda B
This set is a nice mix of explicit and 'soft' nudity. Dakota shines in both.
Thursday, July 20th, 2017 on Xeltin
I tought I could go on without MetArt for a few months. Then I saw this new set of Zelda on twitter....
Saturday, July 15th, 2017 on Angalo
Hi VictorDJ4, it's nice to hear that you checked my other set with Nika and liked the toilet pics, it was a controversial choice somehow and I am glad there are many members who liked the results.
Saturday, December 16th, 2017 on Cilena
This set is terrible it's nothing but teaser shots that belong in playboy magazine. Both the artist and this model did not take their jobs seriously here, on top of that the lighting sucks.
Thursday, November 30th, 2017 on Presenting Jerricka
They complain about the photo quality being too grainy because they find the photo quality too grainy. It may be a “perfectly valid” choice for a photographer but it is also a perfectly valid complaint for those paying for his pictures.
Friday, November 17th, 2017 on Olema
"I sometimes really like it if you get a sequence of the same framing where it's just the focus that shifts from the face, to the vagina, to the feet."
Aye, there's the rub. Most don't run the sequence (I've requested such in the past) and we're left wishing we could have seen the blurry portions as well. Best to show it all, if you're going to only do one shot of that pose, and let the viewer pick what bits they want to focus on.
Thursday, November 16th, 2017 on Edida
It's quaint that you believe what's written about adult models & not a figment of a writer's imagination.
What was it 3 or 4 years ago, Brent Musberger said, "youngsters in Alabama, pick up a football, quarterbacks get the women like that, wow she's good looking," and damn-near lost his job over it. The network apologized, and on and on. You can still find the video clip on youtube, my god, she's so beautiful the little kid next to her is staring in awe.
Now as far as Harvey, what a f'ing pig, but that's what he had been allowed to do for, what 30+ years? Now all of those people who made jokes about it and knew it was going on have ostracized him? What a bunch of bullshit, why didn't they have the balls to man up rather than make jokes? Too comfy in the limelight of Hollywierd, afraid of Harvey ruining them? Sounds like a politician at election time. It all horseshit.
Oh and by the way, big fan of Kaleesy, no where near a fan of food in the set.
Some good points, Victor. Variety is good.
Tuesday, October 31st, 2017 on Hiere
Some interesting and very credible theories with corresponding dialogue, Victor. With your imagination, maybe you could expand on this and see if Rose puts it in MyErotica.com.
I think that speaks to the different photographic styles of Matiss vs. Paromov. Paromov certainly shoots with a more mature theme and poses with his often extravagant set and props. Matiss excels with vibrant, colorful sets, even in the outdoors, where he excels.
What would be real interesting to see is Kate and Caramel switching photogs, with Matiss shooting Caramel, and Paromov with Kate.
Interesting supposition about the stockings --
I find them quite alluring. If I were a Victorian Gentleman, they would drive me absolutely mad with desire.
On the other hand, women with thin legs often wear white stockings (or they should) to give the legs more "body".
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2018 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.