Another high-underrated model with too few postings. Nichole is an absolute darling with a bit of a devilish glint lurking behind those big soulful brown bedroom eyes. And legs that seem to go on forever. Definitely needs to be in the top 10-20 of M-A's models.
Monday, May 5th, 2014 on Presenting Nichole
BTW ... i'd rather see them on the smallish side than extra-large or even grossly oversized. I used to date a young girl who was 5'1" & 95 lbs. who had 36 DDs. Looked grossly out of place on her & caused her no end to shoulder & back problems until she had them reduced to 34 Bs. I know that MA and like sites are all about viewing the human body but think about what the other side might be going through or putting up with in their view of "showing us something".
Sunday, May 4th, 2014 on Nichole A
She DOES. Granted, not as large as some, but not as small as some others. They look like they fit her frame well and she doesn't appear to be too intimidated by them (always covering them up, crossing her arms or turning away from the camera.) Just admire her for what she is! Personally, very dark hair on a model is a definite turn on for me, but that's me being just subjective.
And, if you examine Nicole closely enough, she exhibits no "chicken skin" texturing to her body as when one experiences cold yet, her nipples are almost fully erect throughout the set, leading me to believe that she was truly stimulated by the experience. Looking even closer, you'll see that
"certain something" in her eyes that says she's having fun. I'm sure that, were it not for the overall orange/yellow light cast to most of the set, you'd be able to see that Nicole had a thoracic blush going full tilt - especially with her relatively fair skin.
I stumbled across this set while digging back through the archives and running the accumulated sets done by Deltagamma. The tiny cover photo brought me to an absolute standstill. Nicole is truly an undiscovered Aphrodite lurking among all the others.
The only thing I have any trouble with is the dumb platform shoes. With the extra thick soles, when you look closely enough, it looks like Nicole is wearing her big sister's shoes - truly, they look about 2-3 sizes too big for her feet. But this style of shoe looks the same no matter who's wearing them.
It's too bad that this is Nicole's one and only set here. She certainly had a pretty good chance to rocket to the top of the favorites list.
Sunday, May 4th, 2014 on Presenting Nicole
God! What are those legs ... about 5' long? Looks great on her and makes her look about 6'2" tall!
Saturday, May 3rd, 2014 on Intueri
If you look at her set "FIDELIS" at #86 you'll see that there's a stylized rosary image on her lower back but there's definitely another "image" underneath it. Maybe it's just PhotoShopped out and another image dropped in on top of it, but it definitely looks like there was something else under it.
Also, she's wearing another rosary as a necklace so there might be some sort of "religious" thing going on with her.
Saturday, May 3rd, 2014 on Rachedra
Shooting a model against this color background generally causes their overall skin tone to look kind of off-color and picks up the bluish-green instead of the normal pinkish tone (it's been my experience in the past with models). Green also does this.
Leonardo's sets usually look to me like they're a "take-a-number next please!" kind of operation. Like "How many women can I run through today?" Really rushed.
Would love to see what Helen would look like shot by someone like Arkisi or Catherine or Rylsky.
After taking a closer look at her "tramp stamp" (SAINT) and the use of the rosary beads as a necklace I took a look at some of her older sets and noticed something odd. In some older sets, her "tramp stamp" appears to be a partial sideways rosary and then in some the word SAINT. Could it be possible these are "temporary" tattoos changed at her whim?
" S A I N T "
Uh Doug ... that's "subjectively" not "objectively" I think you mean to say. Subjectively is based on personal feelings, tastes & opinions. "Objectively" is based NOT on personal feelings, tastes & opinions.
Saturday, May 3rd, 2014 on Pisina
He's got hair on the brain (kinda like an ingrown hair - bothers the living S#*t out of him). Maybe he doesn't realize how much high maintenance the female reproductive tract is and some women have just taken to remove one obstacle - or maybe he does. Dunno. Always liked a nicely groomed front lawn e.g. Lorena B, but it's not a deal-breaker for me personally.
Astrud's close but my personal favorite is Lorena B. THAT's what I call a well-manicured front lawn! Too bad you don't have her under contract.
Reminds me of walking through an art gallery with the artwork scattered across the walls - only this time they're all Astrud!
Stopped me in my tracks when I got to #68 though. Never realized Astrud had those very cute freckles across her nose until now. Was way too busy staring deeply into those big, brown bedroom eyes. Really nice head shots in this series.
One thing I missed was the classic "wet hair whip" shot. Maybe a couple of tries there but not quite. Maybe next time?
Thanks for the nice work - and thanks to Astrud.
Saturday, May 3rd, 2014 on Helen H
First, Helen is one of my favorite dark-haired, dark-eyed beauties. She always seems to present a smile and usually works well with the camera.
That being said, this set done by Leonardo does her absolutely no justice.
1) The aqua colored background is a great color mismatch for Helen's overall skin tone.
2) Leonardo (or, if he has staff members) have no ability to see & edit photos for obvious flaws i.e. lens flares & lighting bleeds both on- and off- camera: e.g. #s 5, 62, 64, 83, 85, 89, 91 & 105. Absolutely inexcusable.
3) Repetitive poses; e.g. #s 67-70, 127, 129, 130, 131, 132 & 144 to name but a few.
Not to mention the continuous breast squeezing. Those are wonderfully God-given assets for Helen, not a pair of melons from the market.
I've seen these flaws/oversights in previous sets from Leonardo but this set just goes way beyond the pale of decent erotic photography.
Helen should do herself a favor and quit booking with him.
Finally, Helen my dear, you're way too good looking to have this kind of thing done to you but you're always still one of my favorite models to appear here.
My vote: Helen 9+ Leonardo -2
She's obviously a dancer - you can always tell by the legs (calves in particular and thighs). And a true goddess is not very far from the truth.
Friday, May 2nd, 2014 on Spinta
You can always tell a dancer by their legs and especially their thighs. And cloaking them in black fishnets only exacerbates the situation. Where you find these raven-haired, blue-eyed beauties is beyond me. But whatever you do, do NOT let this one slip away. She's a beauty and a rare treat to look at. VERY nice work!
Really like what you did with the natural window lighting at the very beginning of the set Mr. Rylsky. Works very well with her facial features (among others.)
Thursday, May 1st, 2014 on Okuta
Love the disembodied legs in #45. Very avant-garde! ;-)
#57 is the reason why more women should be photographed with their hair "up." Extremely sophisticated look!
Wednesday, April 30th, 2014 on Synepia
This set confirms what I have believed for a long time. Katie has one of THE most perfect derrieres on a model to ever appear here or elsewhere ... and she and her photographers know it! No matter who photographs her, Katie's derriere is always prominent - either dressed or undressed - and I thank you for that. In fact, you could string together a pretty decent set of photos of nothing but Katie's behind dressed in various articles of clothing. Truly, the quintessential "heart-shaped" ass. Thanks!
Tuesday, April 29th, 2014 on Gelidita
They're definitely "Cs" and not "Bs". In some of her other sets they look even larger. But all-in-all, they're quite nice.
Tuesday, April 29th, 2014 on Pinaca
I posed this question to M-A about a week ago and this is the answer I got:
"Thank you for your email. You might be surprised to know that the word “cunt” is preferred in other countries. When I speak to photographers and use the word “vagina” they don’t like it. I know its strange because for us the word cunt is offensive or derogatory. In other parts of the world apparently this is widely accepted and the norm.
I know it can be annoying but this will probably not go away.
Sunday, April 27th, 2014 on Chariye
Best work I've seen posted here in a while. Too bad Anita seems to have retreated from this venue.
Saturday, April 26th, 2014 on Chariye
..."and it kills me horny! TURNED ME UP ! ! looove HER cheese-pussy !" ... what is given to be your meanings for these word-phrases please?
Wednesday, April 23rd, 2014 on Ennu A
Totally uncalled for. Natural skin coloration + lighting.
Wednesday, April 23rd, 2014 on Presenting Sigrid
I especially liked shots like #61 - 65 where the lighting suggests something like a bathing suit/swimsuit bottom on Sigrid - something that "exists" where nothing actually exists.
Wednesday, April 23rd, 2014 on Riley
And, unless he has some "special arrangement" he pays for his masochism. Yet here he is again, every day, like the litter that blows aimlessly around the street - always managing to get in someone's face.
Or K-12 or even K-8 - but then where would you send it for processing?
Tuesday, April 22nd, 2014 on Listade
The only shot Arkisi missed (and I am REALLY ticked off about it) is the "panties around the ankle as the model steps out of them shot! ;-)
Maybe Arkisi DID shoot such a frame and just left it out of set??? If you did, maybe you could pretty please re-upload the set with it added back in Mr. Arkisi??? PLEASE ???
Saturday, April 19th, 2014 on Listade
Unfortunately for us, yes. This is one dark-haired model who could've taken M-A by storm.
Friday, April 18th, 2014 on Helen G
VERY enticing sets throughout with one exception. A noticeable over-use of facial makeup runs throughout Selestina's sets from the very beginning leading me to believe it's the fault of whomever is doing Mr. Varin's model's makeup. Outside of that, Selestina could (and should) easily make it into M-A's TOP 10 rankings.
Thursday, April 17th, 2014 on Selestina A
OUTSTANDING ! Rated 9.9 (-0.1 for over-use of makeup but that's easily corrected by the photog's makeup artist next time.)
This is probably THE most underrated model set I've yet to see on M-A. MANY more sets are desired of Selestina.
Thursday, April 17th, 2014 on Osades
I also love the way her areolas just barely peek above her demi-cup bra and the just barest hint of a line of body hair running from her navel down to parts south.
Wednesday, April 16th, 2014 on Conini
My thoughts exactly. There are a couple of other models that appear here that I feel the same way about ... unclothed or clothed, they're real "lookers."
If this young woman wished to call herself "Beating heart that awaits the dawn" or some other such pseudonym, SHE IS ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC. First seen as "Walda" on R-A, she has one of the most beautiful behinds I have ever had the privilege of seeing. A classic "heart-shaped ass" if I've ever seen one. That, and those most wonderful of breasts remind me of the old phrase "pink-nosed puppies." Altogether a wonderful package in an extremely pleasant set.
Tuesday, April 15th, 2014 on Presenting Zarina
Wonderfully cute face on Nordica and a really nice tight, trimmed body but I have a problem that might get me into trouble with some of the members who read and post comments.
While Nordica's fair skin certainly plays to her "blonde" looks, she needs to make a choice, either blonde or her natural dark hair color. If blonde, then she really needs to do he eyebrows too. Personally, I think she'd look marvelous with her natural dark hair and a bit of a bush, but that's just my personal opinion. With her eyebrows left their natural dark color, they certainly draw attention to her eyes which she already uses to her benefit.
Either way though, I think she's a hit here on M-A.
Sunday, April 13th, 2014 on Presenting Nordica
This is one woman who knows that she has an extraordinary behind and absolutely LOVES to show it to us! I've never seen ANY photographer NOT photograph her with her derriere up in the air presenting it for all to see. And she looks like she actually enjoys showing it to us!
Friday, April 11th, 2014 on Lernado
"Belt" and "blouse" aren't far behind either. Lets try "plants" & "air" too. ;-)
Friday, April 11th, 2014 on Enige
Great model but really needs to break out into a really big smile to light up her sets. The sort of half-smile she presents in most of her sets makes it look like she doesn't really want to do this kind of work and would actually rather be someplace else. Kind of halfway between cool & aloof & bored.
Friday, April 11th, 2014 on Michelle H
Oh, and it helps if the shirt is just the teensiest bit sheer and the model has dark areolas or the she isn't wearing a bra and the shirt is pulled _just_ tight enough to show erect nipples underneath.
Monday, April 7th, 2014 on Izatea
Women dressed in white dress shirts (with or without button fronts) drive me positively nuts! There's something about a white-shirted woman, more so if she has a dark complexion or a decent tan, that just pushes all my buttons - in a great way. Even better if she has dark hair like Tess.
There's only two ways this set could've been better: 1) if it had been photographed in a studio against a simple black background (images would've jumped off the screen) and 2) the addition of a white lace g-string.
But as it is, Tess worked it very nicely! Thanks!
I agree wholeheartedly!
Someone quick! Teach this woman how to smile and work to the camera. If she turns loose a genuinely warm smile she'll rocket strait to the top of the listings.
Saturday, April 5th, 2014 on Jalera
Have no doubt about it, with that body, I don't doubt that Divina could, if she wanted to, tie and hogtie any male once they were in bed together and reduce him to a quivering mass.
What I truly love about this woman (besides obviously, her body) are her facial expressions. If you look ONLY at her head/face in #s 78 & 82, you see that she is expressing something far greater than "Is this what you wan to see? from me?" Truly, a face to die for! She plays to the camera so very well, the viewer might just as well be on location with her.
Friday, April 4th, 2014 on Rubuce
Friday, April 4th, 2014 on Izatea
"... chiseled in marble" is right. Could very well be a female David. I NEVER tire of looking at her - either with or without clothes.
Thursday, April 3rd, 2014 on Rubuce
Any woman who can arch her back and point her derriere up in the air WITHOUT touching her tummy to the bed (#97) rates very high in my book. The fact that Yarina has a great body & face and can present us with so many "come hither" looks is only a definite plus.
Tuesday, March 25th, 2014 on Vyrazne
Rylsky, you could make a very nice living photographing nothing but Astrud for the rest of your career. Photos #34, 36 & 39 are the epitome of "bedroom eyes" in this woman. I can find fewer models (or sets for that matter) that better present such a wonderful young woman in any better light. As a matter of fact, I could actually say that photos like #36 are a great turn on for me. They give me a great shot of her head and leave "everything else" to my imagination. Well done. I wish more photographers had this sense of their art and of course, a great model like Astrud to work with. Even though it's not a new set, I hope to see many more sets of her in the future.
Friday, March 21st, 2014 on Mend
This young woman would look good dressed in a flour sack! An awesome, tiny, tight, fit body and a killer smile that would both warm anyone's heart and, at the same time, bring out our deepest desires all combine to make this woman and instant hit - no matter where her sets are posted.
I have a sneaking suspicion that if you posted a photo of her (clothed) in a shopping mall, you'd have men walking into things looking at her.
Thursday, March 20th, 2014 on Divina A
;-) Gee ... bear baiting sure is fun! Can't see why it was outlawed. Kinda like fishing for sharks by chumming the waters!
Friday, March 14th, 2014 on Pyrope
On the contrary, I HAVE read your "stuff" - hard, if not impossible, for EVERYONE not to have read your "stuff" if they read the comments section.
"...don't you think all the lousy photoshopping and boring sameness needs to be pointed out and criticized?"
Two ideas there rolled into one there. First, the photoshopping is a TECHNICAL aspect. Some people are good at it, some aren't. "Pointed out" sure, but your postings take it to a whole new beating the corpse with a stick then kicking it a couple of times before setting it on fire then throwing the remains in the river kind of level. In many cases, general observers won't elevate their level of microscopic examination to what you've taken it to.
Second, "boring sameness" is a personal preference and yes, some photgs either get into habit of overusing the multiple framing aspect of digital shooting or just do it because that's the way they're used to shooting and lack some imagination in their shooting style.
As to "guessing" what me and, by extension, everyone else is thinking, you're certainly making dangerous assumptions there.
I don't begrudge you the right to speak your mind, just the manner in which you do it could be toned down a bit - again a bit like going to the top of the mountain and screaming and shouting until the entire world knows.
As for for your wishes that your comments "[will] do some good." look at them. Have they?
Finally, if I choose to read the comments (and many members DO) then, by forced inclusion, the system forces me to scroll down through your rantings to see what other members have said. The system isn't set up to allow members to selectively block their viewing of other members' comments to get to other content.
Your comments about tat removal and MA "getting more real" and the following postings alluding to "integrity", they're probably best addressed to the MA people, not the photog. Those comments make it sound like it's the photographer's purview to display or remove the offending tat. Best probably address in e-mail to the MA higher-ups than to loosely tack it onto comments addressed to photogs (as you have in the past).
One can't help but wonder what the color of the sky is in Doug's world. Maybe he should either rent or buy a camera, contract with a couple of models and open his own website to show us poor suckers just how it's done.
Come on Doug! Who died and made you the PhotoShop police? i don't think I've ever seen your postings on a set where you haven't gone off on a tear about this or that. Seldom is anything said about how you like the model or the set.
Accept the photo sets for what are presented. When it's truly a bad set, compositionally or technically photographed badly, then yes, express your opinion. But, as I'm sure many already realize, you've built yourself a soap box as tall as any worldly monument and, from what it seems, enjoy shouting from the mountain top to the "poor, ignorant masses" with the hope of educating the lesser of the earth.
Everyone knows this content is PhotoShopped to a greater or lesser degree with more or less competence.
And don't give us that crap that "... well, I PAID for GREAT content and COMPETENT photography and i deserve to get it." If you didn't like the content so much, how come you keep hanging around? You remind me of the the two old guys up in the balcony in the Muppets shows - nothing's ever to your liking. Get a life outside of viewing porn for a while.
Wednesday, March 12th, 2014 on Pyrope
Nice set, but not her best presentation. Clemens' shooting/editing leaves too many "look alike" shots in this simple studio shoot. Could have used at least something as a studio prop.
But altogether, a nice view of a young woman with a, to say the least, "impish" or "pixie-ish" smile e.g. #s 126 & 127.
Tuesday, March 11th, 2014 on Nywele
Yet another of M-A's one-time wonders. Clemens posted this sole set of her here and, she started using another name, only two more sets ever appeared - on Stunning 18 and Errotica Archives. Shame - she showed so much promise.
Tuesday, March 4th, 2014 on Presenting Gloria
Zsanett and Arkisi show us in this set that sex is not only in the eye of the beholder - it is also in their mind. Without showing us any of the "good parts" Zhanett and Arkisi manage to show us that this woman is flat-out sexy. Her coy smile, while clutching a towel to cover her nakedness, goes a long way towards being adorable while offering us the hint of "something more."
It also goes to show that a woman need not be enormously endowed or even of average build to be sexy. I dare say there are more than one or two other models photographed by Rylsky here that are, by most descriptions, "well built" but posses less sexual attraction than Zhanett. In this case "less is more" is spot on.
Well done to the both of you!
Friday, February 28th, 2014 on Virkni
This is one woman I could look at WITH her clothes on. As a matter of fact, I think I actually prefer to see her that way. Not that her body is in any way bad looking, it's just that the way you've set up her head shots and portraits and the way she responds to the camera is, to me, almost intoxicating. A fine piece of work. Since she's retired from modeling, she'll be missed. 7 months was far too short a career.
Friday, February 28th, 2014 on Kate E
The glasses were a nice, albeit rarely used, set prop.
Thursday, February 27th, 2014 on Nelsuy
This woman is sexy in almost every way possible. And not in just a "cutesy" kind of way which, in and of itself, isn't all that bad a thing. Lorena manages to look sexy with or without her clothes on and in almost any photographic situation. Even when she has no clothes on, when she's not "showing anything" she always seems to have a coy, sly way of "covering up" that just exudes sexiness. That, coupled together with her almost always at-the-ready smile, manages to make her one of my favorite top models on M-A. It would be hard not to walk into a wall or another person in a mall when staring at her as she walks by.
Tuesday, February 25th, 2014 on Lorena B
One of his best offerings - of course, it's hard to shoot a bad set of Lorena. With her hair up, she positively exudes elegance and grace - clothed that is. Without clothes, she's the perfect feral animal. A relatively simple indoor set simply lit - the dark lace offsets her fair skin color and perfectly accents her dark hair. For the first third of the set she's not even naked yet more of the first 40 photos would NOT be inappropriate.
Wonderful woman and great set.
Tuesday, February 25th, 2014 on Tarkasis
Could be a really promising set. She has a rather attractive body but has to work on her "modeling sense", Her facial expressions in most shots are pensive and, for the most part, she actually seems scared in front of the camera. Looks more like a first posting than her 4th set.
Tuesday, February 25th, 2014 on Pinaca
This is one woman I actually enjoy looking at WITH her clothes on.
Friday, February 21st, 2014 on Torsion
Please ... MUCH more!
Friday, February 21st, 2014 on Kate E
Oh, BTW ... the Wikipedia article you quote from contains a number of factual errors (up to you to ferret them out) which just goes to show you that, as in the past, "don't believe everything you read" and, in this time and place, just because it's posted on this wonderful internet and appears on you monitor, doesn't necessarily mean that everything you're reading is factual or actually true.
Tuesday, February 18th, 2014 on Agmine
You ought to see her on TLE in the classic "little black dress!" She's terminally cute in any of her sets, in or out of clothes. Reminds be a bit of Nikia.
To see more of her, check out the postings of her under the name "Sonya H" on TLE. Absolutely the cutest thing in her sets over there. Don't know why Vladimirov hasn't submitted more of her here on MA. Outstanding face on her although, the sets of her posted on TLE show her with much lighter hair which I think suit her facial features much more. But all in all, a very cute young woman.
Tuesday, February 18th, 2014 on Kloffina A
Great model shot in a really, really nice set with well-done lighting.
Thursday, February 13th, 2014 on Modati
I just had a thought. Going back through my own photo sets taken more than a couple of years ago, it might be that the platform soles might not look all that "feminine" on her (if that's possible). i did a set of photos back a while with a girl who had both platform and flat-soled heels and the flat-soled ones definitely made her look more on the feminine side than the platforms. just a thought.
Of course Helen could probably make a pair of gum boots look sexy if she wanted to!
Monday, February 10th, 2014 on Akasani
Not your fault - it's the M-A software fault. Just happened to me too. It seems as though, if you submit a reply to a previous message and then, for whatever reason want to submit an additional message before your first has been posted, M-A's system software duplicates your first post. Wish they'd fix it.
Sunday, February 9th, 2014 on Akasani
But quite aside from the shoes thing, Helen seems to be one of those women whose facial and hand expressions I could look at for days on end. It seems like those shots where she's either playing with her toussled hair or playfully biting or sucking on her fingers or softly caressing her face - those kinds of shots she seems to pull off effortlessly - they hold some sort of power over me and quite frankly, i could crop off the rest of the frame and use just those head shots as a screensaver if i was so intentioned.
Of course, the entire rest of her "package" is far too beautiful for me to disgrace jsut for a simple headshot!
Since they're actually platform heels, they're what we used to euphemistically call "stripper heels" and I agree, they're just kind of scary in this circumstance. Of course, since her bio (if it's to be believed) says she works in a gym as an instructor, I guess it's possible that she moonlights as a dancer and these wold be a regular part of her equipment. I prefer if a woman wears heels that they be flat-bottomed rather than platform - they look a lot sexier than cheap.
Either clean your glasses or your computer screen.
Saturday, February 8th, 2014 on Presenting Eddison
A marvelous, tiny blonde with a mischievous face and smile and a ne plus ultra derriere that only lacks a set of bite marks on it to make it perfect.
Friday, February 7th, 2014 on Feeona A
"Awkwardly framed" is not the word. Many photographers suffer from "Titannic-itis" the habit of rocking the camera side to side to produce "artsy" effects. makes me a bit seasick. And the lopping off of the head stems from an old photographic trick that, in order to more emphasize the eyes and lower face, a photographer crops off PART of the top of a model's head shifting the viewer's gaze downward. But Matiss sometimes takes it to extremes.
Friday, February 7th, 2014 on Saigo
Maybe a case of extreme astigmatism (or sand-blasted glasses). AND A BROKEN CAPS LOCK KEY. ;-)
Thursday, February 6th, 2014 on Taissia A
Divina points that marvelous derriere like most people point their index fingers - most of the time AT US. AND WE LOVE IT!
Wednesday, February 5th, 2014 on Fineza
Frames #s 127 & 132 show us "practically nothing" yet you'd be hard-pressed to find a couple of cuter, more well-liked shots of Divina. Leonardo has no need to go "snorkeling" with his camera here to get sexy shots of this woman.
Love the "new" look hair color! This brown/auburn color seems to set her facial features,eyes in particular, off in a better way than the blonde hair ever did, IMHO. Been a fan of Millis since her first postings (and no, not just because of her rather ample and beautiful breasts). Her overall body proportions in relation to her breast size is just about perfect. In addition, particularly with the sets LIMANIA and BLITZ she seems to actually want to involve the viewer in her sets. Fine work.
Friday, January 31st, 2014 on Cathedra
Great model & nice set, but i have serious problems with photographers who suffer from AHD (Titanic Disorder) - Attenuated Horizon Disorder - who think that rocking the camera to and fro imparts a sense of artistic quality to the work. Just makes me seasick.
Friday, January 31st, 2014 on Inspiration
"...come in more fully"? That's a bit on the crass side I'd say. What if (as i prefer to think) that this is the way she's developed? What you're basically saying is that "yeah they're nice ... but will be nicer if they're even bigger". Why not accept them for what they are, regardless of what they "might be?"
Thursday, January 30th, 2014 on Presenting Lukki Lima
The dark arm fur is an absolute turn-on for me. It has been seen for years as a sign of an aggressive (in a good way) sexuality.
Glasses are very nice ... more would be even better!
Monday, January 27th, 2014 on Nelsuy
Love women with small, dark areolas.
Thursday, January 23rd, 2014 on Julia B
Besides that ... women with arm - or body - fur (Kira D) or small, dark areolas (Julia B) also push my buttons in all the right ways.
Thursday, January 23rd, 2014 on Baisers
"Dumpster sluts" ... I like that term! I stumbled across this set while reviewing sets of Kira D. Her set "Softly" showed a number of shots where it appeared that she had cut her long hair and ended up with a short, kind of boyish pageboy cut. Kira with short hair looks amazing (to me). So few of MA's models are shot with really short hair that their sets are hard to find and certainly few and far between.
On the other hand, women like Julia B with long, dark/black hair kind of push all my buttons (in a good way) so this set is kind of a win-win for me.
Yet another underrated/under shot model on MA. While I really like Kira, the shots of her with her hair pulled back & turned away from the camera (such as the shots done on the bed) making her look like she's got a short, pageboy style hair style are sooo sexy. More of her shot like this wouldn't be at all disapproved.
Thursday, January 23rd, 2014 on Softly
Other than a few commercial artists (and yes, now the retail cosmetics industry as it is won to do) does anyone "airbrush" any more?
You constantly rail about MA and their photographic contributors, models, "content" and even style, my only question is why are you still a member? It seems as though you may just as well not even bother to view any given set only to perfunctorily pick out a photographer's name and start a diatribe using the comments as a sort of bully pulpit for your views as to how things should be done.
Tuesday, January 21st, 2014 on Coeta
Great high-key lit photoshoots of an adorable woman.
Tuesday, January 21st, 2014 on Diana D
I disagree with you about the background. With Sapphira's overall tan and long, dark hair, the blown out background lighting makes a perfect, non-distractig background as well as providing a great light source for a couple of large surface reflectors placed beside the photographer to bounce light back into Sapphira's figure. I think it's a well-done example of a partial high-key lit subject.
I agree with you completely! But, while it may seem terribly inopportune and maybe even out-of-place, Sapphira is one of the women whom I'd love to drive my tongue up her ass until she squeals with delight.
Catherine, I've see this set before and have come back to it a couple of times. I noticed that Gabriel's expressions, especially early on in the series, seem a bit dour if not in fact uninspired. Then, around #111, she seems get some "life" into her face. but altogether, a generally nice piece of work in that confined space.
With this kind of work, you'll always be a favorite photographer of mine.
Monday, January 20th, 2014 on Aliran
Catherine, if I may butt in .. I believe what he wants is, in photos #46 & 47, Gabriele's face looking back toward the camera.
By the way, I've always been a fan of your work. You know what to focus on when shooting faces especially.
Even if Malinda didn't have a superbly beautiful anatomy (both north and south) I would have fallen in love with her most beautiful face. Some really great eyes and an absolutely kissable mouth.
Very nice work ( on both of your parts).
Monday, January 20th, 2014 on Miraria
I've always maintained that a model needn't have large breasts to be sexy. Not that Anita's are tiny by any means, but she just exudes a certain "sexiness" in all of her work. thanks for another great set.
Saturday, January 18th, 2014 on Denean
Pardon my recent brusque response to you. When I posted my original reply to hipshot131's osting, Cheburator's comment hadn't appeared on the system (or possibly I hadn't scrolled down far enough.) Apologies.
Friday, January 17th, 2014 on Presenting Camilla
Maybe it's my monitor, but why, in your reply to my response to hipshot131's original statement, are you quoting me as saying "pretty famous nude model"? Nowhere in my original response did I say "pretty famous nude model."
If you're going to quote someone, please, make sure the person actually said the phrase you're quoting before you go jumping up and down with your response.
Why is it that a woman's got to "...show the pink bits..." in each and every set, especially her first one? Can't she be just getting acquainted with the process of modeling nude in front of the camera for her first set? I'd much rather see an initial set like this and have the model/photographer progress along to something more revealing in later sets then to see a debut set where she throws her legs up behind her head just to " show the pink bits" right off the bat.
Thursday, January 16th, 2014 on Presenting Camilla
He also suffers from digital-rapid-fire syndrome (photos 81-88 for instance.)
Tuesday, January 14th, 2014 on Mejarane
I should amend that to say "for the most part" or "usually" it's the function of the choice of lenses. In Mila's case it's compounded by the fact that she in fact, DOES have long skinny legs.
What I find frustrating is the preponderance in the use of the tilted frame shots (what I like to call "Titanic" shots) - makes me feel kind of seasick looking at them.
The "endless legs" is a function of a forced perspective floor shot done with a slightly wide-angle lens. Kinda makes he look like something from "The Attack of the 50' Women" movie.
Curiously, if you look at some of her other sets, you'll see 3 separate tattoos on Helen's lower back, tramp stamp style. Some sets/sites show them, some don't. It gives one pause to wonder if we're not seeing temporary tattoos, at least on her lower back. After all, who would be nuts enough to get two previous "permanent" tattoos removed only to have yet another one in the very same place?
Monday, January 13th, 2014 on Awanda
Maybe it was done in her "wilder" days - although as young as she's reported, it's hard to believe she's had many of those. Maybe it was done on a whim, but it looks like it's some sort of stylized religious motif - possibly a rosary - and that may lead to a religious/family connection.
Saturday, January 11th, 2014 on Helen H
Really? Jewelry? THAT'S what you're first drawn to in this set? You have a serious case of ADHD. I agree with rags25 in this respect. I think you're looking at the wrong things.
Saturday, January 11th, 2014 on Henera
"...kind of" frightening! If 3023" hips are only "kind of" frightening, I'd hate to think what would constitute "really" frightening! ;-)
Friday, January 10th, 2014 on Nika N
Many don't care for them, but I've seem to become rather attached to Ms. Schon's style of photography. Sometimes dark and moody, but always expressive and professionally lit, I especially appreciate the sidelit profile shots, be they of a model's face or body (parts), Natasha's work always sits well with me. And as for Ira, I think it's a well-done, set that I'm sure she's proud of. Thanks to both of you!
Tuesday, January 7th, 2014 on Presenting Ira
Doesn't #15 just say "bite me"? If it doesn't, then maybe it's just me.
Monday, January 6th, 2014 on Unarrci
Perchance your monitor needs calibration? Photog here too and color balance looks good on my monitor.
Sunday, January 5th, 2014 on Alseen
But look at it this way ... HE was taught NOT to drag his knuckles so maybe there's hope for him yet!
Friday, January 3rd, 2014 on Erylis
Who do yo think ultimately back the Met-Art Universe?
Monday, December 30th, 2013 on Vorake
It's a shame sets of Hanna were only posted for such a short time. She could easily have found herself firmly lodged in Met's Top 20 for quite a while.
I'm not normally fan of women's faces who've had their eyebrows either shaved off completely and then clownishly re-drawn on or else shaved/plucked to such an extent that they LOOK like they've been re-drawn on, but here, on Hanna, they're done perfectly. They compliment her almond-shaped eyes perfectly and together with that pixie nose and small mouth, make up an entirely sexy face.
Her normal sized hips (which some characterize as either a "big butt" or a "real woman" shape) fit her body size perfectly. And those thighs! She could wrap her legs around me and squeeze 'till the eyeballs popped out of my head and I'd never complain.
An altogether great looking model that disappeared all too soon from Met. Thanks for the well-done work Majoly!
Wednesday, December 25th, 2013 on Kidinia
hard rocks + hard body = "hard"-ly a disagreeable shot in the set! Well done
Saturday, December 14th, 2013 on Valioso
Not only to what her "face" is saying ... that tiny little derriere is wonderful too. Sometimes you see girls/women with tattoos of red lipstick lips/kisses on their behinds - some belong there - some don't. Nikia is the only person I've seen who could pass off a tattooed set of "bite marks" on that cute little tush and make it seem non-offensive.
Friday, December 13th, 2013 on Stesso
Again... not. See previous post.
Friday, December 6th, 2013 on Beceri
Think you might be wrong about that. Look back at some of her older posted sets and her breasts still appear to be the same size (Alisar, Amethyst, Atmos, Insight). If you look closely, she seems to have more "laugh lines" around her eyes - of course that could be a function of UV exposure without sunglasses - in this set than in earlier sets.
Still, all-in-all, a very nice body (except for the "over-blonde-ifyed" hair) - wonder what she looks like with her natural hair color and maybe a bit of a bush.
I used to know a dancer here in the States who looked EXACTLY like Chantelle. Made an absolute fortune dancing in clubs. Same smile, same laughing eyes same dynamite legs & body. Never walked out of a night's work in a club with less than $1500 (and NOT in a big city either). Stayed in "the business" for 3 years and retired and went on to own her own business. Still friends with her. SWORE LIKE A SAILOR - don't know if she did it to increase her tips - but a wonderful girl nonetheless.
Nice to see THIS one's back finally.
Friday, December 6th, 2013 on Monissa
MOST of his replies are either like this or something along the lines of "boring" or "school book". I think he/she's pissed because there's not enough shots oriented for them to use as full-screen screensavers or desktop images. Sad.
Friday, December 6th, 2013 on Lusi A
What set? What exactly didn't you like? What was so boring it put you to sleep? Don't bother posting useless comments if you have nothing positive to add.
Friday, December 6th, 2013 on Margo G
Yet another great set of the stunning Zelda! Shot #121 is almost a perfectly symmetrical shot of Zelda's rear end. Arkisi has produced the almost quintessential shot of her here. The entire rest of the set reflects her always whimsical sense of the whole process. She truly is one of the finest models to appear here or on any other site. keep up the fine work, both of you!
Wednesday, December 4th, 2013 on Anima
More sets like Macy in Seraglio would never hurt this site Arkisi. VERY nice work!
Wednesday, December 4th, 2013 on Macy B
Catherine, to say Luiza is "good" is like saying the Venus di Milo is a "statue." From your very first posting set of this woman, I knew she had that "something extra" in a model. Someone who could actually play to the camera. And it doesn't at all hurt that as a photographer, you appear to know exactly what you are doing. I don't think that there have been more than 2 or 3 total of your sets of various models that I didn't know exactly what you were trying to accomplish.
Keep up the outstanding work! And please, favor us with more of the marvelous Luiza!
Tuesday, December 3rd, 2013 on Preciza
She also has one of the most expressive faces of any of the models currently posted on M-A. I especially love the way Catherine, particularly in her earlier sets of Luiza, seemed to focus as much on her face, as on the rest of her body. Numerous of her earlier sets showed only head-and-shoulders shots of Luiza either gazing off-camera or directly into the lens while delivering the Helen of Troy "looks that launched a thousand ships" looks. Absolutely mezmerizing! Too bad Catherine doesn't have her own site.
Tuesday, December 3rd, 2013 on Luiza A
To paraphrase a song "You can leave your stockings on" Macy. Welcome back! Marvelous legs and smile and ... Great to see you back working again.
Tuesday, December 3rd, 2013 on Habere
"Babe" as posted by someone under user tags is an understatement for this woman!
Monday, December 2nd, 2013 on Silviann A
With a face and body like that you're concerned about FINGERNAILS?
Sunday, December 1st, 2013 on Silva
Yet another fantastically lit and composed set by Natasha. She does more with less light than almost any other photographer posting on Met-Art! The fact that Ira J is a newcomer here gives an extra added something to the set. Photo #20 is quite a work of art. Thanks much Natasha and much continued success Ira J!
Sunday, December 1st, 2013 on Presenting Ira
That, and the fact that Koenart (among other photographers) need to be more careful with framing (cutting off body parts especially) and background item placements - lamps & poles seeming to grown out of heads and arms in odd places. I agree that a couple of smiles tossed out by Diana would have gone a long way to make an all-over better set - especially in partial head shots like #s 118 & 117 - there've been sets she's done before where she's smiling and that goes al long way towards making a mediocre set just a little bit special.
Saturday, November 30th, 2013 on Koito
The set entitled "Softly" is absolutely adorable. This particular set, with Kira's hair cut up short and the intimate nature of a woman doing her makeup is an absolute turn-on. Too bad there's not more postings of her - in particular with the shorter hair. Well done.
Thursday, November 28th, 2013 on Kira D
An extremely cute bubble butt on Nastya. One prone to have bite marks left on it. An altogether nice pairing of skin coloration, the red top, orange drapes and the brocade couch. Very nice work Catherine!
Wednesday, November 27th, 2013 on Unnati
You guys really need to get out more often. With a woman like Fox and her naturally dark hair, she HAS done a "little trim" "...down there". If she hadn't, you wouldn't see anything but the "forest". Typically, very dark-haired women have pubic hair all the way to the inside of their thighs and any "peek-a-boo" shots of their labia are almost a foregone conclusion.
Now the dark forearm hair foretells a very healthy sexual appetite.
Tuesday, November 26th, 2013 on Notropia
Beautiful "high-key" set. Cecile's black hair and red lipstick make a great color counterpoint to the white sheets and stockings. Much more please.
Sunday, November 10th, 2013 on Presenting Cecile
You could always spend your time trying to lick it off your monitor's screen ;-p
Sunday, November 10th, 2013 on Helen H
It's been a Met-Art kind of "policy" in the past not to show tattos if at all possible, although in some newer sets, it seems as if the "policy" has become more of a guideline than a hard-fast rule.
With "dancer's legs" like this, she could just wrap them around my head and squeeze and I'd die happy!
Tuesday, October 29th, 2013 on Limitava
I agree with hipshot131 on this set, Catherine. Andere looked a bit - I'm not sure "frightened" is the right word in this set - maybe "tense" is a better word for it. She seems like a marvelous model but the facial expressions made it seem like she was a bit nervous.
I also was wondering about your use of colors in this set, in particular the green. I'm a long-time photographer and have noticed that you tend to use green in a lot of your photo sets. From what I have experienced, when a photographer uses green in the background when shooting models, the color tends to "spill over" into the model's skin color and give it an unpleasant color cast.
But altogether, not a bad set.
One other question. You previously photographed a model by the name of Sabina B. I haven't seen her in about a year. Any chance of seeing you photograph her again?
Tuesday, October 29th, 2013 on Apakah
Great looking woman. Some very unfortunate photographs though - i.e. the "cover photo" makes it look like she's balanced on a giant dildo. Several others suffer from equally "odd" placements. Paromov needs to be a bit more careful either in taking his photos or else a little more diligent in his editing process.
Tuesday, October 29th, 2013 on Jessica G
Really a tremendous set with Sabina. The kind of very coy/sly smiles add a whole undercurrent to the photos. The fine blonde arm/body hair is a real turn on too.
When will we see more sets of this wonderful woman? Seems like the last posting was in late 2012.
Tuesday, October 29th, 2013 on Tenderoni
This woman's legs are so well built, she MUST be a dancer - or have danced sometime in her past. When she bends over, her legs look like they could go on forever.
Wednesday, October 23rd, 2013 on Diana G
THIS is what is meant by "bedroom eyes".
Tuesday, October 15th, 2013 on Sastoji
Even when this woman isn't "showing anything" she oozes a kind of fun, sexy attitude that's missing in a lot of other sets on MetArt. Not too wild about her new haircut - seems like the older, more curly style suited here better and I certainly miss her wonderful bush but this set again really does it for me.
Sunday, September 29th, 2013 on Capelo
The way she cradles those magnificent breasts, she knows she has something (pretty) "special" there.
Sunday, September 29th, 2013 on Elekto
That peasant top hides a glorious set of breasts. The kind of ethereal look of the whole set only seems to add to this young woman's kind of coy expression. Site needs more shoots like this.
Friday, September 27th, 2013 on Presenting Ruzanna
I agree, at least a bit of a coy smile would be nice now and then. The constant pout makes her look a bit constipated.
Wednesday, September 25th, 2013 on Sheria
Really? You can't tell by her skin coloration???
If anyone needs an example of "smokey eyes" this woman has them. Sometimes her coy little smile says "I'm available" but her eyes say "I REALY want you." Great model and very good set.
Friday, September 6th, 2013 on Vipula
She WAS in the TOP 20 for quite a while, as a matter of fact in the top 5 for quite a while but fell out of favor with the viewers. But altogether, from the start, a really well done set.
Tuesday, August 27th, 2013 on Preciza
really nice earlier sets ('07-'09)
Wednesday, May 22nd, 2013 on Monika A
great trimmed bush
Tuesday, May 21st, 2013 on Alisa A
one of the best sets ever posted
Monday, May 20th, 2013 on Ademais
extremely underrated model, the sets done by Pasha are especially well done, too bad there's no recent postings
Friday, May 17th, 2013 on Alisa A
highly underrated model with girl-next-door looks
Friday, May 10th, 2013 on Tess B
a soapy, sudsy fantantic set
Thursday, May 2nd, 2013 on Micezo
continuously astounding model, needs a better rating than she gets
Tuesday, April 30th, 2013 on Mellor
one of the most underrated models here
Saturday, April 27th, 2013 on Helen H
probably the top most underrated model on Met-Art - almost always with a smile that both lights up the sets and captivates the viewer
Saturday, April 20th, 2013 on Chantelle A
another underrated model with great legs
Saturday, April 20th, 2013 on Rebecca C
Saturday, April 20th, 2013 on Sabina B
always a coy smile, one of MET's most underrated
Tuesday, April 9th, 2013 on Helen H
sultry looking as usual
Friday, April 5th, 2013 on Modela
I suspect he is advising Ennu that he is available to clean her genitals upon demand, arkie. ( ;
...for that matter, heck, so am I!
Thursday, November 13th, 2014 on Ennu A
What the hell you think she's doing in 14!!?? Pay attention!!!
Friday, June 6th, 2014 on Jalera
I agree with you arkie, Kate is very pretty. I'd love to see her return.
Tuesday, May 6th, 2014 on Torsion
She is very pretty arkie. I'd like to see her return too.
Maybe "K" can ask Catherine if this is possible (or maybe a few unpublished sets exist?).
Tuesday, May 6th, 2014 on Kate E
Guess the Saints have fans everywhere!
Monday, May 5th, 2014 on Rachedra
Definitely ... a real heart-breaker.
Lorena B has more than enough photographers in contract
Yes, I agree, I like her "hairstyle" too. And it's not really the Cup, we easily can let many ladies be champions.
Sunday, May 4th, 2014 on Pisina
I know you're into fastidiousness, Arkie, but that hair serves to protect and keep clean that reproductive tract, among other things.
It wouldn't be there if it wasn't a good thing.
And I suppose you're sure to keep your pubic area clean-shaven. I wouldn't bother, tho :-)
That was meant as a play on words, since we were talking about "sexual objects" :-)
Seldom does Leonardo do ANY model any justice... He has his moments, but they've become few and far between.
It may be uncalled for, but it's also accurate... What he sees is neither skin coloration NOR anything to do with lighting. This happens occasionally when the girls get a little careless. It's not a pleasant thing to call them on it, but they should be aware that some people look VERY closely at these photos, and will see anything "amiss"...
Just like you Arkie.
Don't let me wreck your day! :-)
There are clues as to why she does not ...
Thursday, April 10th, 2014 on Jalera
Saturday, April 5th, 2014 on Izatea
Talk about ranting, arkie :-)
"photoshopping": I'll tell you again what I mean by that: the often deliberate painting over of body hair and other skin details, including tats.
I won't stop ranting about it until I don't see it.
I want photographic quality at 100% on my display.
I want a photograph, not a painting.
"boring sameness" -- 99% or so shaved/waxed.
How 'bout a real bush etc more than once a year?
I'm exaggerating a bit, but you get my point...
You might wish me to keep my offensive comments private, but I want as many people as possible to think about what I'm saying.
I am pushing for change, and always have here, as I've said.
It's a long hard slog, as one ex-gov official was fond of noting.
And of course it's gonna rub some people the wrong way.
Ask yourself, arkie, why it does you.
Could it be because I'm telling truths that hurt your ears?
You haven't read much of my stuff, Arkie!
Look me up. Click on my name. Have fun :-)
Absolutely I'm a critic. Always have been here, from the very start.
I joined for one girl; when I believe she's done, I'm outta here :-)
In the meantime, don't you think all the lousy photoshopping and boring sameness needs to be pointed out and criticized?
Guess not! Everybody knows it already!
In any event, they opened up comments and asked us to tell us what we think, so here you and I are, speaking our minds.
Don't let me stop you! As for myself, I expect to continue saying what I think when I'm moved to as long as possible.
I would hope it'll do some good :-)
Of course you are under no obligation to read it :-)
Sunday, March 2nd, 2014 on Virkni
Sorry arkie, Papacito is exactly right. Look again.
42 is another good one, exemplary cuteness.
By "airbrush" I mean painting over part of a digital image with pixels not part of the original capture. That's why you don't see Sapphira's scar in this set.
I'm here because of one model shot by one photographer. There is a bit of politics involved for sure. Since I joined, I've found other things of interest, but as you can see, I have points to make, and I use comments to do so.
As long as you're wearing shades! :-)
Saturday, January 18th, 2014 on Mejarane
So I take it you're not buying into the idea that she's a "pretty famous nude model"...? Or did you miss that assertion by 'Cheburator' down below on this page...? Because if she IS a "famous nude model", we should have at least gotten a glimpse of that "famous" pink...first set here or NOT. One thing's for sure....she IS "gorgeous" and I want to see more of her!!
She'll never do it. I refused to work with her because of that. You have to feel the "scent of the woman" in the set. Otherwise this is boring. Not my style :)
Could be. Maybe she'll get one.
Not that I'm recommending it, Nicky! We're just sayin'... :-)
Agreed. No matter how highly rated, the flat-chested ones would rank higher if they had tits.
Thursday, September 12th, 2013 on Sabina B
I agree with You on 100 %. She definitely should be in TOP10, but there's still something really bad. Helen is one of many MET tattooed girls and in most shoots are this damn good kinky attributes hidden. My question is: Why? Yes, I know, that tattoos are looking good only on some girls, if they've correct combination of eyes/hair colour, face and body type. But all tattoed girls, I've seen there, are even hotter with the tattoos, so why we can't see them?
Sunday, April 28th, 2013 on Helen H
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.