Damn, MA, that's not playing fair. My membership ends today, so I assume it's no coincidence that this week you've sent Jeff and Clarice (twice!) to tempt me into re-subscribing. (I might have wished that they had a chance to work with one of MA's top-tier photographers, but that would be greedy.) I'm sure I'll be back someday. Probably when there's more Jeff and Clarice calling me.
Friday, March 10th, 2017 on Tameda
Too bad she stopped shaving. Too cute to be limited to being a niche model.
Thursday, March 9th, 2017 on Djessy
Mixed bag. I'd give it the lowest scores both technically and, ummm, stimulatingly of Clarice's MA sets. But it's Clarice, so it's still more stimulating than 99% of what we see here.
Monday, March 6th, 2017 on Znemy
Reasonable response, but anything that tends toward "art" here gets lower ratings, hence, my comment.
Sunday, February 26th, 2017 on Sectine
It's not really surprising, but kinda sad that so many can't appreciate a set like this. Very well done.
Keep on keeping the "art" in MA, MA!
Saturday, February 25th, 2017 on Sectine
Glad to see Taressa/Lapa/Pala at MA.
Not too thin (extremely long torso exaggerates her fitness), not too grainy, light really isn't distracting.
Saturday, February 25th, 2017 on Presenting Taressa
Diana Days are among my favorite each month. Damn, she's wonderful.
Time for the long-awaited return of everybody's favorite game: "She Looks a Bit Like..." - actress Leslie Mann.
Saturday, February 25th, 2017 on Tularia
Yep, absolutely awesome. Dani looks fantastic, beautifully photographed, great mix of headshots and views of everything her magnificent body has to offer.
We see ridiculous comments here every day, but to say that this is tame, poor or "not hot" is a new level of...disingenuity?
Saturday, February 18th, 2017 on Delmia
Damn, Odara looking good today.
The concept was good, execution a problem. The reflection in her glasses is just too much of a distraction. In a small room like this you could've aimed the light anywhere else and enough of it would've found her, without showing up in her lenses.
Tuesday, February 14th, 2017 on Sanei
You're on the wrong site.
Sunday, February 12th, 2017 on Aduem
Not perfect, but relatively sharp for a Rylsky set.
Thursday, February 9th, 2017 on Azana
Gloia is quite cute, but the photography...well, let's just attribute the problems to it being Michelle's first time out. Framing/cropping is a major problem. Far too much space containing nothing in far too many images. Unless you're working with a really interesting background (definitely not the case here), it's safest to just fill the frame with the model.
Thursday, February 9th, 2017 on Presenting Gloia
"If you want to make a particular subset of your viewers happy..."
There, fixed it for ya.
Wednesday, February 8th, 2017 on Jorina
Sure, but "Malena woke up naked in my bed and now we're having some fun" is actually a pretty good story.
Friday, February 3rd, 2017 on Tondal
More succinctly: If you never provide any information about why they're "just average" (or terrible or whatever), why should anybody listen to what you say?
Wednesday, January 25th, 2017 on Retin
That word does not mean what you think it means.
Tuesday, January 24th, 2017 on Azua
True. Very weird. Copy-and-paste error, I assume.
Monday, January 23rd, 2017 on Presenting Bellina
Or you could just be incredibly wrong about the quality of the photography. To continue producing stuff that sells is kinda the opposite of dogmatic.
"...approaches that viewers disagree with..."
Even the best photographers here get misguided complaints. For various reasons, not always having to do with the actual quality of their work.
I have no idea what the supposed problem is with 72-78 and 97-107. Look to me like prototypical high-quality MA images, showing all of Elena's good stuff.
Monday, January 23rd, 2017 on Mavin
I'm pretty sure it's both.
Thursday, January 19th, 2017 on Kathina
You got it right, beetle. It's a stylistic choice, not a lack of technical skill. If you don't understand that, you're no "photo geek" and certainly not a "proffesional" photographer. (One thing I've learned in my time here: Anybody who claims to have some photographic expertise is usually fooling themselves.)
Amateurish? Garbage? Lacking in respect for members? Nonsense.
Maybe a significant portion of the membership would rather not see more of Mr Lightfoot's style. That's okay, but a completely different issue.
Sunday, January 15th, 2017 on Presenting Misty Lovelace
Exceptionally beautiful photos of one of our most exceptionally beautiful models.
Extra credit for being the first MA set to use a bottle of Windex as a prop! Soooo hot!
Friday, January 13th, 2017 on Matora
Some photographers have apparently decided that sharp, grain-free photos are passe, bourgeois.
Tuesday, January 10th, 2017 on Jiyu
"No No, not the above 'flaccids' or 'blue-pillers', who easily become obsessively infatuated with these pictorial beauties, - (nauseating pathetically acquiescing comments, 'barf')!"
Thank God we've got a self-infatuated "Alpha Male" such as yourself to set us all straight.
Tuesday, January 10th, 2017 on Presenting Florina
Interesting - even before reading the comments that mention our Clarice and Milla Jovovich, I thought she looked like a fantastic combination of those two spectacular women.
Yuki and Florina - has MA ever had a better two day string of newbies?
Upon close examination (and I'm examining Yuki very closely), #76 isn't a stern look, it's playfully pursing her lips to hide a smile. It's one of my favorite shots from the set.
Overall, Yuki appears to be one of the many models here who would rather not show her teeth. Not necessary, as we see in super-cute photos #32 and #36. But if a model doesn't want to show teeth it's much better to go with the relaxed facial expression than trying to smile while keeping her lips closed.
Monday, January 9th, 2017 on Presenting Yuki
Hey, look! It's another hard-to-believe-anybody-can-look-this-hot Ukrainian babe!
Yuki is physically blessed from head to toe - and we're blessed that she decided to share her amazing goodies with us. Eyes, breasts, curves, pussy - all fantastic. And no sign of any stupid tattoos!
Okay, MA, bring her back every month!
Monday, January 9th, 2017 on Yuki
The 9th of every month is now "Yuki Day". I expect - no, demand - that Yuki make an appearance on Yuki Day for the next, say, 5-6 years.
Have a problem with the pigtails? You have my sincerest condolences.
Not sure where you're trying to go with this comment. The decision was made so we shouldn't be surprised that more and more sets are of shorter length - regardless of whether they feature favorite models or photographers.
Wednesday, January 4th, 2017 on Breca
Emmy trivia: Her siblings are named Tony, Oscar, Grammy, Nobel, Pulitzer, MacArthur, Rhodes and Heisman.
Wednesday, January 4th, 2017 on Ackya
Unimaginative? Boring? Awkward?
Well, I'm just glad I don't suffer from whatever malady it is that afflicts those of you that honestly feel that way. (I'm never sure that comments here are entirely honest.)
This is great stuff featuring one of the site's hottest current models.
Wednesday, December 28th, 2016 on Mebri
Y'all be crazy.
Tuesday, December 27th, 2016 on Mittel
Ahhh, Clarice, my favorite disk space hog. Every time she makes an appearance I'm obliged to download the whole set, in high res. Absofuckinglutely perfect.
Saturday, December 17th, 2016 on Rynoi
One minor complaint - the same smile in most every photo. Photographers need to make sure there's some variety in facial expressions.
Thursday, December 15th, 2016 on Letheni
Late to comment, but: Bonus points to Serena and Arkisi for working so quickly while maintaining quality. When the sun is that far down it doesn't hang around while photographer and model dawdle. 120 high-quality photos in just a few minutes is damn impressive.
Tuesday, December 13th, 2016 on Pazale
Are you sure you really want to read his comment? In half the time you took to write your response, you could've run it through the translator yourself.
"Too hairy! I can not lick!"
Friday, December 9th, 2016 on Presenting Frankie
Okay, so Elle goes into monthly rotation. I'm gonna be more than a little annoyed if I'm not spending New Year's Day with her, MA!
Thursday, December 1st, 2016 on Presenting Elle Tan
I somehow skipped over Jamie's previous appearances. Won't make that mistake again - perfect face.
Thursday, December 1st, 2016 on Loeris
Insipid? Uninspiring? Sepia-toned?
Now y'all are just makin' shit up.
Great set of pix, featuring one of the site's current superstars.
Tuesday, November 29th, 2016 on Restode
Standing around the edge of a lake/river is a pretty uninspired setting for a photo set. But it is Candy B, whose body can overcome most any obstacle.
Tuesday, November 22nd, 2016 on Brenia
Nah, that was just growing up. Started as a teen, now a woman.
Sunday, November 20th, 2016 on Vanola
"angulation", "cunni-lingual", "Japlish" - the comments for this photo set have been enlightening, who-knew-that-was-a-word?-wise.
MA: You come for the porn, you stay for the education!
Saturday, November 19th, 2016 on Ragtha
Well, I don't think you could say that any form of porn, whether this great set of photos or her hardcore work, is really "necessary". (The furniture does look kinda familiar. Michelle might've been thoroughly "unnecessaried" right after the photo shoot.)
But this one goes into the MA Hall of Fame. 52, 63, 99, 121 - absofuckinlutelyamazing.
Saturday, November 19th, 2016 on Vanola
Gotta appreciate the visual irony here: It's obviously been awhile since Nancy ate a pink frosted doughnut.
Thursday, November 17th, 2016 on Zeillin
Quite a bit of physical similarity today. If showed me a photo of Katie, Kalisy, Pandora and Cherish together and told me they're sisters, I'd believe it.
Saturday, November 12th, 2016 on Zalona
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
Friday, November 11th, 2016 on Ganthy
Clarice + Shirley = Threesome Of The Month
Could've stopped after two photos and I would've been happy. Amazing, incredible, fantastic face. Excellent body, too. Time to shave.
Tuesday, November 1st, 2016 on Jerlean
"...members who wish shorter, more tightly edited photosets..."
In any case, I'm pretty sure that's a misinterpretation of the "too repetitious" complaints. I don't think anybody wants fewer photos, just more variety.
Monday, October 31st, 2016 on Presenting Mila Mendes
Leanisa has a very particular set of skills. Skills she has acquired over a relatively short career. Skills that make her a dream for people like me.
Tuesday, October 25th, 2016 on Traella
Just noticed that Lena's up around six feet tall - for some reason that sends her omigodiwanthersomuch factor even further into the stratosphere.
Monday, October 17th, 2016 on Leuri
Interesting that the score is so low when it's significantly more revealing than your average Schon set.
re: rants about the photographer's ability: You know not of what you speak. You may not like her style, but she knows what she's doing.
Monday, October 17th, 2016 on Presenting Ines
Cute, but not a problem. You see her feet in some pix, but not all. And that's okay.
Sunday, October 16th, 2016 on Bidra
Models who have been around for awhile have "go to" poses that recur throughout their careers. Today's #49 contains a prime example of the pose that shall forevermore be known as "The Caprice". Still works.
Tuesday, October 11th, 2016 on Villade
Unfortunately, your problems with the "classic site" are user-specific. I haven't seen anything to complain about.
Thursday, October 6th, 2016 on Esithe
Clarice has been the primary participant in my fantasies and dreams since her first appearance here six months ago - today's set only cements her place at #1. She's just unbearably perfect in every way.
But I still wish the Heavy Red Lipstick thing would die a quick and permanent death.
Thursday, October 6th, 2016 on Madlae
Today's "short sets" cover a wide variety of poses, so I don't have a problem with what's been given to us.
But I can absolutely guarantee one thing: If "artists" learn that they can submit smaller sets, they will. And that will inevitably mean fewer poses/angles - and less creativity - per set. Yeah, arbitrary minimums are silly, but starting the editing process with fewer images is a bad idea. Expect 120-150 images from the "artists" and you'll have no problem creating final sets with 80-100 acceptable images. Accepting significantly fewer images from photographers doesn't affect their "artistic freedom", it encourages them to be less creative.
Wednesday, October 5th, 2016 on Chelma
Very clever, but there's at least a gallon-and-a-half of Cara on display here today.
Wednesday, October 5th, 2016 on Tresine
Not too long ago Emily said she hadn't done any work for MA in a couple of years, so I assume everything we see here is from the vault. I'm just glad that vault is as large as it is.
Tuesday, October 4th, 2016 on Nacila
Damn, that's good.
If today was the last day we could view beautiful nekkid women on sites like this, it would be a pretty good way to go out.
Thursday, September 29th, 2016 on Pivera
Perhaps he just saw the name of the photographer and wrote his comment without viewing the images?
It may be Paromov's least weird set ever.
Wednesday, September 28th, 2016 on Miacale
#20 wins the day, but it was a photo-finish over #26.
Wednesday, September 28th, 2016 on Presenting Jamie Joi
"filler"? Are you sure you didn't intend this comment for some other set of photos?
In any case, I'll take the opposite point: Alex, don't change a thing. Nothing at all wrong with the way this set was organized. Any set that includes a series like 51-55 isn't lacking in "spicy".
Monday, September 26th, 2016 on Acadden
Oh good, it's the beautiful Dani
Her ability to delight is uncanny
I suppose there's no way
I could play with Miss Sea
And explore every nook and cranny?
Sunday, September 25th, 2016 on Lajiel
Your description of her smile is unnecessarily harsh, but it does get a bit freaky when a model never changes her expression. (Almost never: #62 is the photo you were looking for.) And it is the photographer's fault.
Still, Linda is an excellent addition to MA World, far from boring.
Friday, September 23rd, 2016 on Presenting Linda Chase
Yeah, the relentless gray makes it a bit depressing.
Wednesday, September 21st, 2016 on Kinra
Saturday, September 17th, 2016 on Moshee
The score and the complaints are off the mark, this is damn good stuff.
Wednesday, September 14th, 2016 on Ruana
But "repetition" isn't a valid complaint (you can always ignore the "duplicates").
If you're going to smaller sets, it should be the result of editing, removing out-of-focus images, etc. Lowering the required number of images provided by the photographer - the starting point for the editing process - is a very bad idea.
Monday, September 12th, 2016 on Somefi
Debora generates so much heat my desk now looks like a Salvador Dali painting.
23 + 42 = 10
Sunday, September 11th, 2016 on Melliyan
Meh, not much gained by having them appear together. Better to have 40 shots of each model solo.
However, 74 and 75 made it all worthwhile. Perfect pix of perfect Emily.
Saturday, September 10th, 2016 on Karedi
Yeah, lots of excellent shots of one of MA's most wonderful faces.
But Albert should "just say no" to those '80s-wedding-style vignetted images (see pic #1). Really goofy.
Friday, September 9th, 2016 on Nahari
Exceptional set of pix - 101-105 is a quintet hard to beat.
Adel's last couple of sets have kicked my...admiration for her up several notches. Which is saying something considering where that admiration started.
Wednesday, September 7th, 2016 on Frelisi
A bit busy with the cards and the fruit and the curtains - but all is forgiven once you see #49. Yum.
Wednesday, September 7th, 2016 on Presenting Adele Shaw
"she cleans up her act"? WTF?
Saturday, September 3rd, 2016 on Fantale
That kind of implies that Clarice isn't one of MA's superstars, which she most definitely is.
Perfect ending to a 40-point day.
Saturday, September 3rd, 2016 on Lecion
Perfect. One of MA's all-time best photo sets.
Thursday, September 1st, 2016 on Vivesia
Gloria and Alex save the day. Ms Sol's appearances always make me happy.
But 1-for-6 is a pretty poor batting average.
Thursday, September 1st, 2016 on Radoti
You definitely get the feeling that Viola enjoys having one of the world's most outrageously amazing bodies. She can be an extremely bad girl, yet playfully cute in sets like today's.
Monday, August 29th, 2016 on Trejalla
Boom. A day with Dani and Aurmi certainly makes up for what has been a relatively uninspiring couple of weeks.
Friday, August 26th, 2016 on Hanida
Exceptionally beautiful, perfect body.
Three appearances on the network spread across eight months doesn't bode well for getting Aurmi into the monthly rotation - but I'll keep multiple fingers and toes crossed, hoping.
Friday, August 26th, 2016 on Presenting Aurmi
Super-cute girl. Sweet sexy lips. All-around fantastic body, excellent breasts, perfect pussy.
Monthly revisits, please!
Monday, August 22nd, 2016 on Presenting Carrie
Tuesday, August 9th, 2016 on Tadey
Oh, yes, they are.
Monday, August 8th, 2016 on Saggio
Hot and beautifully photographed. Kika definitely has one of the world's sexiest faces...and lots of other very nice things.
An 8-week class in "Photographic Lighting Techniques" will be taught by Arkisi starting this Wednesday at 10am in room 408. Attendance is mandatory for all current and future MA photographers.
Monday, August 8th, 2016 on Siaca
Perfect. Debora is absolutely amazing.
#88 is like seeing a Snow Leopard: Seated, leaning back a little - and still getting both Debora's face and pussy in focus! It can be done!
Monday, August 8th, 2016 on Cabora
I become a bigger fan every time I see a new set featuring Adel/Olivia/Olyvia/Amber. She looks exceptionally desirable here.
For the most part, "technical" complaints about the set confuse problems with artistic choices. You may not like the style, but it's a long way from low quality. I'm not the biggest fan of using subdued light, but Alex does it quite well. Given that choice, grain is inevitable. At least it's understandable here, unlike those who splash a ton of light on a girl and still give us grainy product. Depth of field choices could always be better, but that's just the unofficial MA style.
You can put me in the apparent minority about the shorts. Shows off her curves very nicely. And there's something hot about shorts that take a bit of work to remove.
Friday, August 5th, 2016 on Osike
Fortunately, there's nothing "saggio" about Nici - she's got a firm grip on a spot in the list of the World's Most Amazing Bodies. Nekkid pitchers are rarely as hot as the sequence of 73-78.
C'mon, MA, let's have monthly appearances by one of the Natural Wonders of the World!
Wednesday, August 3rd, 2016 on Saggio
I've embarrassed myself enough previously raving about Clarice so I'll keep it short: Perfect teen girlfriend. Flawless set of images. This one goes straight into the MA Hall of Fame.
Sunday, July 31st, 2016 on Semio
Less? The panties were gone by #26.
I don't know why you'd think Emily had retired. She's been shooting for a variety of sites - now including her own - pretty much continuously since she was 18. And she can be seen 'live' online most days.
This set - meh. Lots of exposure and focusing problems. It's Emily, but far from the best of Emily.
Saturday, July 30th, 2016 on Nizaco
There ya go: somebody - some web site - out there needs to figure out a way of getting Dani and Mila into a bed together.
Sunday, July 24th, 2016 on Valiede
Leona looking her usual Leona-rific self. In an excellent set of photos.
7.96 as of 7:20am in the eastern US? Hmm, sounds like a retaliatory strike in our little civil war. Can't we all just get along? ;)
Sunday, July 17th, 2016 on Paradi
Stella looks nothing like her sister Li, one of them must have bee adopted ;)
Wednesday, July 13th, 2016 on Presenting Stella Moon
Poor girl falls outta bed and nobody is willing to help her back into bed? That ain't right.
Saturday, July 9th, 2016 on Presenting Lana Blue
Cute girl, very hot body, yum.
Technically perfect. Sharp, well lit, nice variety of angles and crops. Every photographer here would do well to emulate what Albert did in this set with Nicole.
Thursday, July 7th, 2016 on Presenting Nicole La Cray
Funny, accusing others of "banal" comments while using the completely meaningless "meaningful".
I agree that there are many here who go overboard with descriptors like "sensational" and "gorgeous", but calling them out in regard to a specific model is...ungentlemanly, at best. If you're in disagreement about a model being qualified to appear here, better to e-mail management.
Saturday, July 2nd, 2016 on Presenting Caroline Abel
"So clearly, the artist very heavily influences what I get out of a set."
Of course they do. But it's still about what they produce. Saying "I want more sets photographed by X" doesn't make much sense (unless you like X on some personal level and you want to help him/her out). Saying "I want more sets that are more/less glam, more/less explicit, more/less sharp, more/less well-lit" makes sense.
In today's comments I don't see much "I want to see more DG sets because they are ...". It's all about numbers and quotas and "fairness". And that's fine, but not the way you want to run a business if your goal is keeping the maximum number of customers as happy as possible.
Wednesday, June 29th, 2016 on Rodena
Keep up the great work, K. Most of us don't give a damn who's behind the camera. Beautiful women, beautifully photographed is all that really matters. The idea that the site somehow suffers because any group of photographers is statistically underrepresented is just goofy.
Tuesday, June 28th, 2016 on Rodena
This is definitely one of the best of Mia's many great sets to appear on MA. Exceptionally well done. (The b&w pix at the end still seem like an unnecessary affectation to me, but no harm, no foul.)
I'm getting a bit bored with the "political" commentary. You're a photographer and you feel you're being treated unfairly here? I don't care, take your complaints to management. You're a member with an outside relationship with a photographer? That's great, I'm happy for you. But I'm not interested in your 700 word rant about how your fav is getting figuratively screwed. You're a photographer who is coordinating or encouraging the comments by some of your "member-friends"? You'd probably be better off spending that time shooting more stuff and improving the quality of your content.
Write whatever you want, that's your right (as long as you're not insulting a model). But you'll be taken more seriously when you stick to discussing the merits of the content.
Excellent set of pix with one of MA's new superstars. Great stuff.
Friday, June 24th, 2016 on Terandi
She's magically delicious. Wouldn't complain if you decided to give us a photo set and video starring Emily every week.
Monday, March 18th, 2013 on Emily Bloom
Ho-hum, another day, another set of photos with really bad focus problems.
What the hell is going on around here???
Thursday, November 14th, 2013 on Baies
I love Emily and she looks as great as ever here. Artistic and technical complaints about this set are misguided. But I hope going unshaven is a one-time treat for those who like that kind of thing - the world's most perfect pussy is best shown fully shaved.
Friday, January 10th, 2014 on Orrumai
So only those who agree with you can say what they think? It's okay for you to slander one of the site's most popular models, but if I don't agree with you I'm not allowed to call you an idiot? The idea that calling out someone on their comments is some kind of "censorship" is typical Nutjob Nation crap.
Hey, it's fine to say that you don't think Caprice should be on the site. Wrong, but fine. But to call her a "slut" and a "skank" isn't necessary. And makes you, in my opinion, an idiot. C'mon, I doubt seriously that I'm the first person to think of you that way. Given the number of "thumbs down" on your comments, looks like I'm not even the only one here to think you're an idiot.
As to being "boss of peoples comments", I don't want the job. But I think it's pretty stupid for site management to allow insulting comments to remain on the site. Including mine, when I call another member an idiot.
Thursday, April 25th, 2013 on Caprice A
Yeah, sure, nude but not explicit pictures of someone as beautiful as "Camilla" are a rip-off. I'm sure it's not that she's just uncomfortable with showing more. You should definitely consider it a personal insult.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with occasional sets like this. It was one of four today, one of over 100 this month.
"...leaves me angry"? "Too good for us?" Given your bizarre reaction to the set, I'd say, yes, she is too good for you.
Wednesday, February 19th, 2014 on Kawaii
So...you see technically excellent nude images of a model with one of the most perfect faces on MA - and one of the most amazing bodies anywhere - and you give it a sub-8.0 score.
I'll invoke Thumper's Dad's Rule and just go with...fascinating.
Wednesday, April 15th, 2015 on Olanu
You've done an admirable job of ignoring the "Art" part of the site's name while placing all emphasis on the "E".
Buying a membership in a web site and then complaining that it is what it's always been is an interesting phenomenon. Good luck with that.
fwiw, those "beautiful models faces" are what separate Met-Art from lesser sites - where you'd probably be happier.
Wednesday, July 16th, 2014 on Sejel
Jeff, Aza, Colleen. Okay, I get it. It's "Drive the Membership Nucking Futs Day".
Cute and sexy overload.
Monday, April 7th, 2014 on Tapjoa
Holy crap, seems like the vocal portion of the membership shared a big box of Nasty-O's for breakfast this morning.
Yeah, Rilee doesn't look happy to be here and the quality of the photography may be an all-time low for this site. But "underfed", "abused", "used up" and jumping to conclusions about drug use??? Her weight is perfectly fine and I don't see any signs of abuse. We got an unadulterated look at a girl with less-than-perfect skin.
I'm embarrassed for y'all.
Saturday, June 1st, 2013 on Explotar
Hmm, hard to believe that Met-Art's managers would allow comments to remain on their site wherein some idiot calls their top-rated model a "slut" and a "skank".
Friday, April 19th, 2013 on Caprice A
I kinda enjoy the variety Paramov's sets bring to the site - and the ridiculous comments from the soulless drone contingent that inevitably follow.
Thursday, January 28th, 2016 on Jarane
Very cute with an exceptionally fuc...desirable little body, Anita deserves a bunch more 9's and 10's. And a return appearance in about four weeks.
Tuesday, May 5th, 2015 on Presenting Anita Bellini
It really isn't fair that a woman has a face like Yarina's and a body like Yarina's.
Thank Good for unfairness.
Monday, December 29th, 2014 on Rimane
If you're bored looking at nekkid photos of someone who looks like Barbie, the problem ain't in the photos.
Friday, December 19th, 2014 on Mithan
15 consecutive monthly visits from delicious Ardelia - we have been deciquintuply blessed. Or something like that.
Wednesday, May 28th, 2014 on Pienia
But I doubt that the "general membership" takes it as some kind of insult by the model and photographer, like you do. Taking it personally is seriously weird. Jenya has limits about what kind of poses she's willing to do. I'm 100% sure it has nothing to do with how she feels about you.
Friday, March 14th, 2014 on Cheoli
In the entire history of the planet it's highly unlikely that any woman has been blessed with a more perfect body.
And we're incredibly lucky to get to view amazing Candy on a monthly basis.
And then there's the guy (or girl?) who gets to explore her flawlessness on a regular basis - well, that's somewhere near "billion dollar lottery winner in consecutive weeks" on the lucky scale.
Thursday, February 4th, 2016 on Testula
Oh, please, please, please bring back the "thumbs down". Please!
Some folks just plain deserve to have their feelings hurt.
Saturday, November 2nd, 2013 on Essipi
Incredible body. Very cute with a nice variety of looks. Please, let's see much more of Sabrina!
Wednesday, September 25th, 2013 on Sabrina G
Let's see - 120+ sharp, well-lit pix of one of Met-Art's sexiest faces and most perfect bodies, 60+ full nude, healthy percentage of full-frontal. Yeah, I'm okay with that.
Gynecology is fun, but not always necessary. I've seen enough of her naughtiest bits to know that I'd enjoy what Jackie has to offer.
Friday, May 31st, 2013 on Giorni
Eh, not every photo set needs to be a porn set. I'm as much of a fan of sharp views of a well-shaved pussy as anyone, but it's okay to have a few like this mixed in. It's not bad for what it is. The graininess was an artistic choice to use a high ISO setting. Gives it a bit of a dreamy early morning look. Not really intended for viewing at max res, just take in the full view.
Okay, commence with the "thumbs downing" cuz, ya know, variety sucks. ;)
Thursday, May 30th, 2013 on Silenzio
Well, I guess we know somebody got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.
Wednesday, January 13th, 2016 on Presenting Renata
I'll occasionally think I've found a new favorite model on MA - and then Emily will make an appearance like this one and bring me back to my senses. Hard to imagine anyone surpassing her combination of cute and hot.
And she's announced that she'll soon have her own web site. A dangerous prospect for those suffering from Emily addiction.
Monday, November 30th, 2015 on Inreca
We don't often (never?) give credit to the person(s) responsible for hair and make-up, but he/she/they should take a bow today. Vinka's hair and make-up are a perfect fit for her wonderfully sweet teen face.
Thursday, November 12th, 2015 on Presenting Vinka
Anna is so ridiculously beautiful that she can be a bit intimidating in some of her MA sets. Not so this time, just gorgeous and hot.
Hard to imagine anybody looking at the first image in the set and still giving it a sub-8.0 score. Y'all are weird.
Monday, August 3rd, 2015 on Myotta
True story: Guy goes to the store, buys an apple. Takes the apple home. Spends the next three years berating the apple for not being a tomato.
His name? Yin-yang.
Thursday, May 7th, 2015 on Banie
Probably an insult? Of course it's an insult. hipshot occasionally makes stupid comments like this. A woman is "stuck up" if she doesn't show him what he wants to see. Wouldn't want to be a woman who knows him in "real life".
So she's not comfortable showing what most models here are willing to show. That doesn't make her "stuck up" or (LOL) "anally rententive", it makes her uncomfortable showing what most models here are willing to show. Taking that personally is "Sad!!!"
Saturday, April 11th, 2015 on Puede
I agree with you on this one, Albert. Unfortunately "poetry" gets low grades around here, we've been overrun by soulless drones.
Sunday, December 14th, 2014 on Dyuti
Very cute girl with an exceptional, 10+ body. The photography here isn't terrible, but doesn't present Sabrina at her best. Can't wait to see her indoors, in bed, in sharp photos.
Wednesday, September 25th, 2013 on Presenting Sabrina
Let's see...Sybil, on her back, spreading her legs to show off her perfect pussy. And seems to be more than a little excited about it.
What's not to like?
Tuesday, January 19th, 2016 on Cosier
Fascinating. With a little effort you can see Michelle being a very bad girl elsewhere on the web - yet the hint of "hanky panky" with Koenart in this set is every bit as stimulating in its own way as seeing her "in action".
So incredibly hot. 120-122 mindblowingly so.
Monday, November 23rd, 2015 on Fugite
Marta is quite lovely - and, of course, wonderfully bodacious. Her skin appears to be a little overexposed, but still yummy stuff.
Just a thought, but if you find naked photos of someone as delicious as Marta to be "boring", maybe the problem isn't with the images?
Monday, June 9th, 2014 on Bonade
Well, if you don't like outdoor locations, fine. But for an outdoor shoot, this wasn't bad at all. And kudos to "Marlene" for giving us some sharp photos - something many of the photogs here can't seem to get right even when shooting indoors with studio lighting.
Malinda: very cute and great body. Hidden tattoos = good thing.
Wednesday, July 17th, 2013 on Kampos
You still don't get it, not surprising. I'm not trying to tell anybody what they "can and can't say about a model". I said two things: (1) If you say what you've said, I think you're an idiot. (2) It's pretty stupid that site managers allow insulting comments to stay on the site.
fwiw, your comments would be taken more seriously if you didn't resort to using the inflammatory words you've used. "Prostitute"? Really? Where'd you get that idea?
Friday, April 26th, 2013 on Caprice A
On good days I save a handful of images from 2-3 sets.
But sometimes I have to give up and download a whole set.
In multiple resolutions.
And store them on all my computer-ish devices.
And spend the morning editing the hi-res versions to create 50 wallpaper-sized headshots of one of the world's most perfect faces.
And put those headshots into DisplayFusion so I have a constant rotation of perfect distractions on each of the three monitors on my desk all day long.
And wonder if Leonardo would be willing to send me a few dozen images in even higher resolution so I can create life-size posters.
Fortunately for my schedule, "sometimes" has only happened once.
Monday, April 11th, 2016 on Presenting Clarice
Braces, pigtails, white dress...on her knees, looking up at the camera...that's a whole lot of "naughty girl" heat.Today's other models (hey, only three galleries today????) will have to wait until I catch my breath.
Wednesday, January 20th, 2016 on Detaule
Super cute girl, flawless body, absolutely perfect pussy. Easy 10-pointer.
Thursday, December 31st, 2015 on Sirite
Let's see...very cute girl, hot body, sweet pussy, cleanly shaved, beautifully photographed.
Yep, pretty much the definition of what I hope to find here when I check in every morning. Thank you, MA!
Saturday, December 19th, 2015 on Cinka
That body AND that absolutely perfect pussy? No, not fair at all.
Friday, September 4th, 2015 on Contedi
First time anyone wore that shirt as a modest understatement.
Monday, May 18th, 2015 on Narsel
It's an unusual day when a video is the highlight of the day - but there's nothing usual about Mango and her perfect pussy. Great stuff.
Tuesday, April 28th, 2015 on Ostena
Gotta love the phony indignation, like we haven't seen sets like this on a regular basis since MA's early days.
As mentioned elsewhere, unless you've got a belly button fetish, we see all of Carolizi here. Very sexy girl, fantastic body, pretty good photography.
Tuesday, February 10th, 2015 on Subard
Another appearance by Sybil
Makes me drool until it's a dribble
I like her a lot
She's unbearably hot
Of that there can be no quibble
Sunday, December 21st, 2014 on Perche
I'm sure I've admired Lydia's work before, yet I was actually surprised when she took off her top - damn, what a body. Large, perfect breasts, great curves, very nice pussy. And the magical dark hair/blue eyes combination.
All's well in MA-World today.
Wednesday, June 18th, 2014 on Tutavia
Please Don't Feed The Troll
Friday, May 30th, 2014 on Yofiri
Apparently the word of the day for describing Angelika is "sexy". Yep, her face and body pretty much demand it. Very nice debut.
Thursday, May 22nd, 2014 on Presenting Angelika
Actually, Arkisi's comments on her "Presenting..." set indicated that he wouldn't work with her because she wouldn't show more. If that unwillingness = "so stuck up" in your mind then I invite you to join us in the real world.
fwiw, I don't care how you categorize the site. I have no problem getting plenty of "erotic enjoyment" out of the images Camilla has shared with us thus far. If you can't, you have my sympathy.
Really, Met-Art? Marta and Emily Bloom on the same day? You do realize that if you give us heart attacks we'll have to cancel our memberships?
Amazingly great debut set.
Wednesday, August 21st, 2013 on Presenting Marta
After Diana's debut I had a bad feeling she might be a "one hit wonder" or infrequent visitor - exceptionally glad to see she's in a monthly rotation. Let's hope it continues for a year or three.
Wednesday, June 15th, 2016 on Sudri
Kudos to Deltagamma for choosing a very challenging location and creating a pretty darn nice set of images. If you only looked at the thumbnails you might think the lighting would be too distracting, but that's not the case. Another good look at one of the world's sexiest women.
#125 is alone worth today's price of admission.
Wednesday, March 23rd, 2016 on Gaturi
This is a truly excellent batch of images. Beautiful Debora (looks like she could be Lilit A's sister), stylishly sophisticated set, beautifully lit and photographed. Put it in the MA Hall of Fame.
"monochromatic"? Well, us white folks tend to be that way. And I really don't care that much about the color of the furniture. The important thing is capturing the model correctly, which definitely wasn't a problem here.
"all naked all the time" - as a complaint? really? And tomorrow guys will complain that a model was too slow to get nekkid. Variety - it's okay.
Excuse me, now I have to go check out Debora's previous appearances, which I apparently slept through.
Tuesday, March 22nd, 2016 on Jocule
Shhhh. Just admit you're on the wrong site and go away quietly.
Thursday, November 12th, 2015 on Aritmo
Paromov had some truly awful outings in his/her early days (focus!), but this is spectacular stuff. Doesn't hurt to be working with angelic Angelika.
Sets like this break up the monotony. Enjoy them and endure the inevitable down-votes by the soulless drones.
Friday, July 31st, 2015 on Pyntura
Yes she is. She should consider a career in getting naked for the camera.
Sunday, June 14th, 2015 on Dessiny
"...being disrespectful to women, but to photography as well"
You don't really believe that, so why say it? Artistic photography has included post-processing as long as there's been artistic photography. And trying to make a photograph's subject more attractive is the complete opposite of disrespectful.
Sunday, April 26th, 2015 on Navee
Geez, the soulless drones are out in full-force today - four models who are all well above average on the MA Attractiveness Scale and only one of them over 8.5?
Monday, March 23rd, 2015 on Samani
I could give it a 10, but that wouldn't be right. It's at least a 14.
Beautiful and beautifully photographed. Plenty hot, too. Automatic addition to the Met-Art Hall of Fame.
Wednesday, March 4th, 2015 on Sendiri
Nice attitude. Yeah, her pussy is much much much too good for you.
Wednesday, December 31st, 2014 on Hateny
Nastya looks as delicious as ever today. The pix with the scarf on her head don't do much for me in an erotic sense, but still get some points for creativity. Overall a great set.
Note to other photographers: if you're shooting indoors with artificial lighting, this is a perfect example of the kind of sharpness and clarity you should be aiming for. Technically excellent.
Thursday, September 25th, 2014 on Nigeno
I'll say this about Aza - sheza seriously yummy girl. And thatza fact.
Friday, August 29th, 2014 on Chenmo
Very nice set of one of my favorite models. Wonderful face and nice tight body. Nicely done technically with a nice variety of images. Nice.
Monday, August 25th, 2014 on Tilab
Bodies just don't get any more perfect than Iness's. Amazing breasts, great curves, flawless butt - and a perfect pussy. Yeah, the blonde/white hair probably isn't the best choice for her, but looking any hotter than she does today would do permanent damage to my heart.
Sunday, August 10th, 2014 on Presenting Iness
"...you are taking small (petite), ADULT women and shaving them to make them look like preadolescents to feed your daddy fantasies"
Why the hell would you choose to turn an aesthetic preference into a choice between good and evil? What's next - a fascination with redheads is indicative of Satan worship? Try to have enough confidence in your own preferences to not have to demonize those who feel differently.
So please, stop, just stop.
Monday, August 4th, 2014 on Citta
Location, look on her face, hair and that perfect body - today Yarina graduated from "very hot Euro-babe" to "extreme lust-inspiring goddess".
I want one.
Friday, August 1st, 2014 on Enundo
Geez, you're still here, Doug?
Yes, this site is for people who enjoy what this site offers. Unlike all the other sites that try to cater to people who don't like what they have to offer.
Sunday, July 27th, 2014 on Koyado
Serena's debut is an excellent example of "cute girl-next-door gets playfully naughty". Sadly, that door is several thousand miles away from mine. Magical blue eyes and no tattoos or excess hair to detract from her wonderfulness, she's adorable. And hot. More please!
Sunday, June 22nd, 2014 on Presenting Serena Wood
Attractive woman with a very nice body. Gotta love that pussy. Interesting that I correctly assumed she was Russian before opening her bio. She just has that look.
Pretty good set, with a few too many of the usual "can't show her face and any other body part in focus at the same time" images. Odd that there are no photos of her both naked and upright, kneeling or standing.
Wednesday, May 21st, 2014 on Presenting Avrora
I agree with you --almost-- completely, but Victoriya is so damn cute and has such an amazing body that I can't say the set is completely without "appeal". e.g. #43 - so deliciously sweetly sexy.
Fingers are crossed that she'll make some appearances after realizing that shaving below the waist is just as worthwhile as shaving above. She certainly ain't shy about showing what she's got.
Saturday, March 29th, 2014 on Bijele
As someone who has occasionally done some wedding photography, I also approve - although it's usually a bridesmaid I'd choose for the naked part.
Saturday, October 12th, 2013 on Presenting Mesed
Congratulations on winning "Ridiculous Comment of the Day"!
She looks great.
Friday, August 9th, 2013 on Navina
Ya beat me to it: Ding, ding, ding, ding - 40 point day!
Thursday, May 12th, 2016 on Tipica
Hmmm, 8.08 after six hours? I guess the Albert-haters and the Pseudo-Photography-Experts ("OMG, a few stray rays of sunlight TOTALLY RUINED the set! Varin's a hack!") have had their say.
I don't care and I have faith that MA also knows this is a great set of images featuring one of the new stars of MA. #94 won the internet today.
Tuesday, April 5th, 2016 on Talico
Who is the people that look at these photos and don't see the pretty girl?
Thursday, December 3rd, 2015 on Batesi
Different strokes, etc etc. That look, which she's been using since Day One, never fails to drive me nucking futs.
Friday, November 27th, 2015 on Zerua
Congrats, you get ridiculous comment of the day! (I'm gonna assume that was your goal.)
In other words - great set of photos.
Thursday, September 10th, 2015 on Velije
Yeah, sure, right.
Unburden yourself. Tell us how Leonardo hurt you, so we can understand such a bizarre comment.
So hot. Beautifully photographed.
Monday, July 6th, 2015 on Milosa
It's a 12. Nancy has never looked better - that face, that hair, that pussy. And one of the world's most perfectly fit bodies.
Excellent set, but I wanna slap Leonardo for not making the most of having Nancy in "The Much Too Rare Model On Her Back Viewed From Above" position. Only two images in portrait orientation - both with her head chopped off???
Still, a MA Hall of Fame set.
Monday, June 1st, 2015 on Sunria
Poor Michelle, so hot she has to make sure all her clothes are made of non-combustible materials.
Thursday, May 28th, 2015 on Majadi
Very attractive girl with a perfect body, excellent photos. This one goes into the MA Hall of Fame.
Sunday, May 17th, 2015 on Yagni
Super cute girl next door, big beautiful breasts, perfectly shaved, deliciously naughty. Sharp, well-lit photos. It don't get much better than this in MetArtLand.
Friday, February 6th, 2015 on Blastecy
Can we all just agree to stipulate that y-y would like to see more hair on every model every day? Save time, energy and bytes.
Until a couple months ago we had a sadly clueless member who ranted about the same thing every day - more hair, more hair, more hair. He couldn't grasp that it's just not that kind of site. His obsession finally drove him nuts, made some seriously vile comments and disappeared. Let's not go there again.
Wednesday, November 19th, 2014 on Mirase
I'm here to sing the praises of Kantata. Let us all raise our voices in joyous celebration of the return of this lovely - and exceptionally hot - young woman.
Sunday, September 28th, 2014 on Antrate
Ain't no doubt about it, Sweet Candy's got one of the world's most perfect bodies. She and her parents could be the basis for some serious genetic studies to figure out how such a wonderful thing happens.
Tuesday, September 9th, 2014 on Sinota
"Please welcome our newest photographer, Flooglehorn McAperture"
Monday, August 25th, 2014 on Presenting Kantata
Girl-next-door kind of girl in a light, bright girl-next-door kind of settings. Very good set.
I somehow missed Aislin's debut set. Looks like her two sets thus far were shot in the same location, different times of day. Time to move to the bed!
Saturday, May 31st, 2014 on Caenea
Well, damn, how did I not pay attention to Cathleen's earlier appearances??? Excellent combination of beautiful face and very hot little body.
Saturday, February 1st, 2014 on Mezitay
Some people, who shall remain nameless, whined a bit too much about getting thumbed down. I guess their feelings were hurt.
Boo-hoo. Don't want thumbs down? Don't say stupid s**t.
Tuesday, November 19th, 2013 on Leggur
Absolutely astounding. I'm not gonna get any work done today.
And some of you rate her less than 9??? C'mon.
Wednesday, August 21st, 2013 on Jossa
"OMG, I can't stand it, there are porn stars on my favorite porn site!"
Monday, July 22nd, 2013 on Deklarim
three and a half!
Monday, January 8th, 2018 on Moshee
You're damn right it's a good story, at least two of us also you our imaginations and that's why the member between our legs is erect and having fun!
Thursday, September 28th, 2017 on Tondal
i think i had multiple window tabs opened and commented on the wrong 1. i heard luci li retired on a different site because she got pregnant but i just seen a new set from her here in the past few days.
and i know my reply is 10 months later, i just discovered the replies section lol
Saturday, May 27th, 2017 on Nizaco
Rylsky IS one of MA's top-tier photographers, and I believe Jeff has also indicated she will only work with him, so being greedy in this case won't likely get you far.
Hope you'll be back soon, bibblefuss – it's been nice having you here.
You need to do more than call an unpopular set "art" to win the argument. Any photograph can be considered art. The thing you have to remember is that there is good art and bad art. Of course, good and bad are in the eyes of the beholder.
Taressa is a petite favorite at other sites.
Welcome to Met Art!
Love your tiny little bottom.
Have to disagree about the shadowy lighting though.
We can't see her beautiful features clearly.
That is not erotic - it's frustrating.
I won't fault someone for their opinion, but man oh man, to me, this set is pretty mind blowing. :)
uuussseee's comments are generally in this vein although sometimes, s/he does make some succinct statements.
All done with smoke and mirrors. I'm sure our friend _furry_ would be almost apoplectic over this. ;-)
Blurry photography makes having high quality samples pointless.
The 19th & 29th would also seem appropriate, then we could have one day for a standard striptease, one for bottomlessness and the last for being thoroughly and righteously nude throughout.
Thank you for your input, bibblefuss.
Friday, January 6th, 2017 on Breca
I agree, this is a great set ~ well, it would be, had it not been chopped down by almost a third to fit the short-set mandate.
Thursday, December 29th, 2016 on Mebri
There always has the be at least one! Like it says you can please some of the people but never all of them! We all have our own personal quirks and though we may feel they are main line others don't like them. A fact of life.
Works for me! Eye to eye toe to toe. Unless she comes out in the platform heels that are so popular these days!
Monday, December 19th, 2016 on Leuri
To be fair, Albert Varin's signature style is to shoot with indirect lighting and muted colors. It's a different style than, say, Matiss or Catherine, whose sets are more bright and vivid. I don't mind so much, because I like variety, but I can see how others might not be as fond of it.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I'm always inspired when Emma Sweet is in the frame. Some people just get off on complaining, I think.
I'd love to have a taste of her pretty pink doughnut. :)
Thank goodness it's the first of the month and there are six sets. This one was lousy.
There is not one picture worth downloading. I never thought
I would see the day this would happen on MetArt.
OMGIWHSM factor... nice! Unfortunately (for me) I'd be staring eye-to-eye at her throat most of the time (when I'd not be staring at "other" areas of her). ;-)
Tuesday, October 18th, 2016 on Leuri
I don't want to see her feet in particular. I want to see her all, in the standard sized photoset format. I feel shorted of almost a third of a set here. Think what lovely photos got left on the cutting-room floor to satisfy the new arbitrary 2/3 photoset standard...
Monday, October 17th, 2016 on Bidra
I think he was referring to this set only being 89 photographs, not that he has some sort of foot fetish. Although...she does have nice feet, I would like to see a few more.
As explained yesterday, the "classic site" is not friendly to Widows users.
The latest problem with forward/next is currently fixed - for now.
Actually, bibblefuss, I think the artists are not submitting shorter sets.
Artists get paid by the photo, not the set.
The impetus to shorter sets is not coming from the artists.
Thursday, October 6th, 2016 on Chelma
...sure, but only 89 photos of it.
A quart of quality milk is still quality milk, but less of it than a gallon of it.
Thursday, October 6th, 2016 on Tresine
I don't agree with your deduction that artists will be forced "... to be less creative." On the contrary, I think that smaller sets _may_ force artists to be more selective and at the same time more creative about what they actually end up shooting. After all, if you know you're only going to get 80-100 shots to make your point, either you get more creative in order to make a point or tell a story in less frames or you get to be sharper in the terms of your editing.
Try looking at it this way. If a photographer is going to have a gallery opening and is told to submit 20 photos, they'll turn in what they think their best 20 are. But then if they're told that of those 20, only 10 will actually be hung, you bet that they will pick what they consider their absolute best from that 20.
Such wonderful bosoms she has
to her curvy figure add pizazz
A Sea of mammary delight
To dream of sucking all night
But surely don't miss the rest
Which feature of her is the best?
What would Rose like to do?
Oh, to see a set of those two!
But alas, she concedes too shy
Seadogg has surely tried
Agree. Caught the constant fixed smile after only a few photos (nice as it is). OK for a couple but not 100+. IMHO, Do blame photographer. All he had to do was ask and suspect she could have worked it for the camera.
I gotta agree here bibblefuss, the problem, as I see it is that Dave Lee rushed a Met Virgin too fast. Remember, she has to strip for a male artist,and a probably all-male crew. Even an experienced model is often nervous in that situation, and I think that's what we see here. I could be blowing smoke, but I really don't think so. Ivé seen it too often.10++++ for Linda Chase's beauty,1 for Dave Lee, he really blew it. I really hope Linda returns.we need her beauty.
Sunday, September 18th, 2016 on Moshee
Sometimes a complaint is a negative thing... but, sometimes, it's a constructive criticism... sometimes it's a way for the artist to get even better.
Thursday, September 15th, 2016 on Ruana
That's not what I meant at all, Bibblefuss – today's other three girls have all made many appearances here and have big fan followings. Clarice is pretty new, and less well known – but maybe this photoset will change that! :-)
I prefer to just say it's her best set BY FAR.
Winner of the genetic lottery
...and I thought it was only me...
Saturday, August 27th, 2016 on Hanida
Natural?? Those ain't natural son
I have to order an autographed photo of Her from the official site:-)
I sadly had to agree. This is SAD! I have no idea why lovely Emily agree to this unless she owed Erik Latica another shoot on her contract with him. I gave Emily Bloom a 10 ++++++ and Erik Latica a 0.
That really IS all I can come up with at that idea... the brain literally boggles.
The pairing I was thinking of was Daniel Sea and Matiss's Roxi... Heck, why not all three of them together? Oh lordy my brain literally boggles. Gonna need a reboot here... LOL
Monday, July 25th, 2016 on Valiede
Different Moms. 😁
It makes perfect sense if the artist you are referring to has a perfect record of producing exactly the kind of sets you want to see. (: That first list I was talking about are very very consistent both in the quality of their work but also in the content. Some of them are more experimental than others ~ but I know if I see their name, I can expect a good set and 99% of the time, I'm right.
So, for me, it makes perfect sense. The reason I became a friend of Davi's elsewhere (on FB) is because I grew to like his work so much. If I didn't like his work, I would not have become his friend, and I would not be asking for his work, since every set published of his could potentially push out a set by one of my favorite artists. In other words: I like his work ~ that's why I ask for more of it. (:
Davi hasn't said a word, bibblefuss. It's his fans who've been politicking here. I'm fine with you not liking it, but comments forum is here so that we can express our opinions, just like you can express yours.
As Rose says, anything is fair game, as long as you're not insulting to the models. This is an unprecedented level of politicking, sure, but with Davi's successful history with MetArt and the whole MetArt family, it is ridiculous that his new publications have slowed to a trickle of one every two or three months.
bibblefuss, when I was first a member (and please don't misunderstand me, I'm not trying to talk down to you, since for all I'm aware, you've been a member longer than I ~ I'm just sharing my perspective, not attacking you or your comment) I had a similar attitude to yours.
However, over time, it impressed me more and more clearly that every artist has a distinctive style, and over time, I have amassed a list of artist whose work almost always pleases me and provides almost exactly what I want to see ~ and, a list of artists for whose work I feel not one way or the other ~ and, a list of artists who consistently disappoint my expectations, especially given the caliber of models they work with.
Personally, I feel it's very obvious that the artist's style very heavily influences the set and exactly what I get out of the set. Certain artists focus on one dynamic and certain others focus on other dynamics. Some like to go fancy, others down to earth. Some like to go glam, some like to look more natural. Some go very explicit, some eschew explicit altogether. So clearly, the artist very heavily influences what I get out of a set.
....you ARE aware that the Florida recount WAS completed, later, aren't you? (:
For some reason, which I am at a complete failure to comprehend, the mainstream media didn't make very much of that story, nor of the final results. Gosh, I wonder why. (:
Thursday, June 23rd, 2016 on Tostie
"... there's no conspiracy here."
I would suggest that if you are not privy to the information, you do not know that.
Thursday, June 23rd, 2016 on Presenting Emanuelle
Come guys, Can not see that Rylsky is very limited as to what he can say and who he can point fingers at. It is a very stupid man who bites the hand that feeds him. He is pushing the envelope as is. There is no democracy here. All of the artists are independent contractors and subject to the whims of a couple of people. The system always controls the odds not the players. As has very well illustrated in our Primaries this year. The house controls the odds and the results!
Wednesday, June 22nd, 2016 on Presenting Emanuelle
not simple? sorry. just forget it then.
Did you ever heard about free trial or special offers for membership?
I am confused so much with such comments, 90+ % of people who was asked - they already understand that miracles not possible if all these miracles somehow happened for 1 side. Nobody will ever believe that all REGULAR members did the same or became insane or crazy from March of 2016. It 's really impossible. What is visible and possible is that cheating attack in 1 direction lower everything and raise only few PERSONS. Are you sure you still misunderstand?
Tuesday, June 21st, 2016 on Tostie
My friends at HMBHIHSA (Hey, My Bike Had Its Handlebars Stolen Again) would like a word with you.
Monday, June 20th, 2016 on Akrina
Hanna B is a pretty decent look-alike here on MET, btw....
Monday, June 20th, 2016 on Kareda
Completely agree. The most impressive thing about her acting is how easy it is to forget that she plays all the characters. They're so different from each other yet she plays them all very well.
Which now makes me think... which clone would be the best to get together with? Hmmm. Alison seems like she'd be a real tiger at sexytime, though Cosima has excellent taste in women....
I agree with you bibbllfuss. Helena is so cute, we need clones of her.
Nice Orphan Black reference. We need Tatiana to pose here. :)
Thank you for your kind reply,my friend.I like to learn from my own mistakes.
I´ve just loaded the first picture of "Presenting Marit",last Rylsky´s set published,and the first of the present set into Photoshop CC.I can see some slight graininess at 600% in the picture by Rylsky.I can see gross gaininess at 200% in the picture by Lightfoot.Check it out.Both images are approx.same file size.Slightly higher in Charle´s picture.Considering file size is about 3700 x 5600 pixels,zooming at 600% renders a considerable enlargement of the pixels themselves,and the microcristalline structure of the lens begins to be visible.
In Rylsky´s,I do not think it´s due to ISO,because artificial lighting is clearly noticeable,used in order to soften the features in Marit´s face,along with natural light.I do not think cranking up ISO settings was necessary in these light conditions.
In the case of Charles,it´s more likely the reason,as he uses only natural lighting.
But,bibble,my friend,is natural to perceive some aberrations when we zoom in nearly to subatomic level,where Newtonian physics make no sense and Heissenberg´s uncertainty principle is King:)
Last,but not least I saw some pics by Arkisi,Catherine and Matiss
and the outcome was about the same as Rylsky´s,being Cathy slighty better.
I´m not as enthusiastic for Mr Rylsky as you say,but I believe Rylsky is impeccable.
But Charles,stubborn,wants to resolve a catch 22 question,and it makes his outcomes waaaay worse in terms of quality,though I really like his style.
Thanks.A pleasure talking to you.The Seller
Sunday, June 12th, 2016 on Nishia
This new more sophisticated Emily is still as wonderful as she was when she first appeared on MetArt 4 years ago although sadly she doesn’t quite seem to smile as much as you used to. Never mind – she still has that lovely face and that killer body. Emily has salvaged for me what would otherwise have been a very disappointing and below-average daily offering on MetArt.
Saturday, June 11th, 2016 on Emily Bloom
Give me Set name ,picture number,bibble.You often reply to me in a overtly despiseful way,but Never back it up with any example.
I know you´re an educated and respectful guy,and,if it all boils down to any kind of aversion or dislike towards me or my comments,I do not care whatsoever.But if you mean Rylsky is capable of producing an amorphous noisy sludge,please show me and all the others where it is.The Seller
Saturday, June 11th, 2016 on Nishia
Well done, bro!
Tuesday, June 7th, 2016 on Etalde
Where you come up with that number I don't know but it does not account for the physiological effect. The people effecting the vote vote very early when there are few if any votes and they can get maximum effect. Then their vote has the effect on encouraging others to vote lower than they would if the set had a higher score. This is very noticeable on certain artists who seem to have offended these people for some perceived slight. On a system like MA where there so many beautiful women and the scores are so very consistent a .01 can move a model down quite a few spots. Say today's top model ratings. There are 20 models at 9.14 so if you drop a model .01 she would drop 20 places on the top models charts. The difference between #3 @9.17 and #121 @9.10 is .07. Another falicy is the # of votes cast. It is never even close to 1000. On a good day a popular model might get 350 votes. The vast majority doesn't even vote.
Wednesday, June 1st, 2016 on Ilasia
"the maximum change I can inflict on the overall score is 0.04"
OK. let's calculate.
1. what will you need to change for 0.02 if so,e rating based on 9,000+ Votes?
2. can you easily change ratings based on 1000 or less Votes?
3. can you remove from top rating the models who has ratings based on 3000+ votes?not so easy. can you remove from top any model with 1000- votes? easy!
Wednesday, May 25th, 2016 on Ilasia
why conspiracy? just imagine why it changes on 1 side, not as chaos but as visible move in 1 direction. it's very clear. but , as i said, we can just watch it and smile or we can care about it and became the same stupid chickens as these people who cheat on MA ratings past months. it is not chaos and it was not 1 of 10 for all. it was very funny to see and believe me, I saw these manipulations here sometimes, it's always goes to support somebody the way as make all other competitors ratings down, not only cheater's rating up. that's why it was always so visible. and that's why I don't care.
I'm sure he knows that.
Saturday, May 14th, 2016 on Presenting Alina Valera
We won't even go into how Rose would greet Lucy Li. We ARE gentlemen here.(and the ladies are ladies)
You make a good point, bibblefuss...
Thursday, May 12th, 2016 on Presenting Mila Azul
Agreed in every respect, sometimes the stuff that gets entered into the models' data pages looks pretty darn ludicrous on the face of it. (:
Wednesday, May 11th, 2016 on Presenting Diana Bronce
She had a small tuft of pube hair just like that , only it was blond. She never shaved yet was otherwise hairless. Smooth as a babies bum.
Never seen it since.
Tuesday, May 10th, 2016 on Presenting Diana Bronce
Ha! I thought the exact same thing. I promise I didn't see your post before I wrote mine. :)
Tuesday, May 3rd, 2016 on Inspiration
NOT the demographic you'd EXPECT MA to appeal to, amirite? (;
Monday, May 2nd, 2016 on Rodel
I don't get that impression at all. Even in her non-smiling shots, she is engaging the viewer with her eyes.
Thursday, April 28th, 2016 on Spadie
Even without opening each individual thumbnail, I can tell she's laughing and smiling throughout the set. Where's this disinterest you speak of?
right you are
I concur about the hair color. She looks a tad too serious with black hair and she looks more "girl next door" with chestnut brown hair like this. I don't know why, but that's my impression. (:
Sunday, April 24th, 2016 on Espadi
Agreed, bibblefuss, I sometimes wonder if some commenters are completely tone-deaf to the way their posts sound...
Friday, April 22nd, 2016 on Presenting Kylie Quinn
Not a penny! He is but one of many here who do outstanding work consistently month after month!
...no doubt bibble "The proofreader" is still working efficiently.
Thank you,next time I´ll use Word 2013 first,then cut & paste.Thes Eller
Tuesday, April 19th, 2016 on Musria
Now, THAT "was an unnecessarily stupid thing to say".
Monday, April 18th, 2016 on Presenting Lucy Doll
Keep it friendly please, guys.
Sunday, April 17th, 2016 on Presenting Lucy Doll
Not really, "bibblefuss", it just doesn't agree with your opinion.
Though I have, actually, seen prettier girls behind the counter at BK.
Unique to say the least- There is a job waiting for her (when she retires) doing cartoon voice overs...... Mmm, bad indeed......
Saturday, April 16th, 2016 on Presenting Lucy Doll
tattoos are completely ornamental, while plastic tits are disgusting (think about plastic bags under your skin) and a living lie: 'look at me, I have big boobs! I am good genetic material.'
Monday, April 11th, 2016 on Shulla
Wow, bibblefuss! Impressive!
Saturday, April 9th, 2016 on Seutha
That segment from #1 to 124 is pretty awesome, too. :)
Thursday, April 7th, 2016 on Enodi
Wrong number: #89 is the sexual-energy-generator. Add 88, 90, 93 and 95 for nuclear detonation.
bibblefuss, I should have been more clear. I was NOT, and I never claimed to be, speaking for EVERY SINGLE MA MEMBER.
That having been said. Please be patient as I explain why I WAS speaking for SOME other members, apparently a significant proportion of them.
Personally, I don't remember when you arrived on the scene so I am going to assume for the purpose of avoiding further offense to you that you have been around at least as long as I have, since around 2010 if not earlier.
That being said, if you reach back in your memories, I am SURE you will remember that, after Sapphira had appeared in several sets, there was one or two where one or two shots were published where her scar was NOT edited out.
As a result, a significant number of members ~ significant enough to get MA's content manager, K's attention. She later (several sets later) posted a comment on this subject. It seems that ENOUGH members had complained that they preferred that the scar not be edited out, that K had asked the photographers who shoot Sapphira not to edit out the scar before submitting her sets.
Now that I have clarified that I did not, in fact, speak for ALL the members, nor did I claim to: and now that we have refreshed our memories about what DID happen and what a significant number of members DID request, I am sure you will see that there is absolutely no reason for you to be personally offended by my original response to our friend Zygrel's original post.
I hope you have a wonderful Sunday! (: Until tomorrow...
Sunday, March 27th, 2016 on Reunas
If she is ok with it them I would respect her wishes. They could have spent more time on the editing though, in some shots you can see the editing standing out. When that happens I think it is just distracting. If this is an old set when they did this all the time, fine. I've never seen this one so it's new to me and when I see some bad editing it really stands out. But I think we can all agree, Sapphira = beautiful, anyway you look at it.
bibblefuss - Funny how you take _fer_ to task for speaking for "the members", yet you take it upon yourself to speak for Sapphira.
Saturday, March 26th, 2016 on Reunas
Actually it was a great choice. The setting was in deference to Mia's naturally pale skin. Not only do redheads not photograph well in open sunlight but an hour or two in bright sun can be very Painful and damaging to that creamy redhead complexion that makes them so special. I once spent a whole night wrapping my girlfriend in wet towels to sooth her pain and keep her from blistering to badly. A very scary and unpleasant night and a lesson I have never forgot!
I agree, I welcome the variety that Met-Art provides us, across all the sets.
Reading the comments here, it seems you can never please everyone. Too subdued, or too colourful. Some models start clothed, some naked. Some wear awful shoes. Recognising that some people like to see legs in shoes, that's variety, that satisfies the shoes fans. She took them off, which pleases me as I like to see bare feet.
My wish now is for a little more variety with this particular model. Debora is a stunning girl. Her three sets have been fairly subdued interiors. I hope Arkisi will do something different next time they meet, but if it's another "monochromatic" interior set, I won't be complaining.
There was nothing in my comment that said bad photography. As you say it is a style judgement and I simply don't like her style.
Wednesday, March 16th, 2016 on Presenting Sofi Shane
Right. It's a two-pronged problem. :)
Wednesday, March 16th, 2016 on Milonia
Right on! Some like her style, some don't.
One of the other sets today is for me too hi-key so this set is an interesting contrast and for me far more beautiful.
Even when the tags are reasonably objective, they're incomplete. Just now, as a random example, I picked a gallery from 2004:
Alissa, the model in this set, in various photos wears a robe, a hat, a white thong, black panties, is on a couch, wears a translucent dress, and conceals herself behind curtains. She has long brunette hair and a trimmed and shaped patch of pubic hair. Tags that identify these facts would be helpful.
Instead we get: awesome bush, gorgeous ass, hairy, hairy pussy, hot body, long hair, lovely bush, more please, natural beauty, never shave, panties, real woman, thick bush, wonderful bush
Tuesday, March 15th, 2016 on Milonia
Funny,the only thing I would have changed is her position in front of the gap in the hedge,its distracting. Otherwise Olwen looks like she is ready to have some fun in the sun.Now if Rose would only do this.
Wednesday, March 9th, 2016 on Lavidu
If a subscriber appreciates a Model
He would like to see her at all sites in which she is present with THE SAME NAME.
So could collect all the pictures of that model according to the interpretation of the various photographers.
Very well it made MetArt to standardize the name of the models (in most cases) in its network.
Tuesday, March 1st, 2016 on Presenting Adel Morel
If you don't already have it bookmarked, visit thenude.eu. It's an invaluable resource when cross referencing models with different across different sites. Helps eliminate some of the frustration.
The model's name is the model's choice, bibblefuss – we do our best to be consistent across our family of sites, but some models change their name as often as they change their hairstyle!
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2018 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.