The High Res pics are so blurry. Please don't dishonor this beauty by using a drug store disposable camera.
Saturday, March 18th, 2017 on Lepaan
I think we can all agree that Deltagamma did an outstanding job here. Sapphira is perfection. Any photographer who airbrushes away her sexy scar is a clueless coward.
Tuesday, March 14th, 2017 on Atoro
I thought I was looking at Katharine McPhee for a minute. Wow! Those eyes.
Put Shari with a photographer who makes an effort and she'll be rookie of the year.
Sunday, March 5th, 2017 on Presenting Shari
I like this girl but I'll pass on the cream. Itchydick is no fun.
Tuesday, January 3rd, 2017 on Tilane
How whipped do you have to be to keep making excuses for poor photography? Koenart needs to scrap the Fisher-Price camera and try a little harder.
Monday, December 26th, 2016 on Miala
Melena is why there should be a rating higher than 10.
Saturday, December 24th, 2016 on Carnez
Probably the same guys who beg for more penis pix at Hegre.
Wednesday, December 21st, 2016 on Maldezi
No comments about her beautiful scar being airbrushed out? Sapphira has shown the courage to show that scar proudly. Too bad Mark doesn't have the same backbone.
Sunday, December 11th, 2016 on Lentra
Top-quality model in flip-phone-quality photos. What an insult.
Thursday, December 8th, 2016 on Najia
What drug store was this disposable camera bought at? How disrespectful to the models to use such grainy film. Inexcusable and an insult to the art of photography.
Saturday, November 19th, 2016 on Levitate
Even with braces on her teeth she still looks like a supermodel. What a goddess. Pure perfection!
Saturday, November 19th, 2016 on Vanola
It's in every single reflective photo in this set, not just that one. Nothing clever or teasing about it.
Getting back to the facts...photo #81 is one of the greatest ever featured on this site. It's like a top tier supermodel photo that you might see on the cover of a certain lingerie catalog. Mia is AMAZING.
Saturday, November 5th, 2016 on Kalnee
I'd rather see 80 quality photos that tell a story than see 150 photos filled with poor lighting, bad angles, and blur jobs from photographers who just want to clickity-click the camera like they're playing a video game.
No...that blurry close-up of a model's right elbow is NOT art, no matter how desperately you try to fool yourself.
Tuesday, October 25th, 2016 on Presenting Venice Lei
The lame excuses that some people make for bad photography are more entertaining than the crummy photos themselves. The sad thing is that the poor work comes at the expense of the model as well as the paying MetArt subscribers.
This isn't art. Stop insulting your own intelligence. An epileptic rhesus monkey could have produced similar photos if you put a disposable drug store generic camera in its hands.
You never see any of these blurry, off-centered images featured in any of the MetArt ads out there on the web. Why is that? Because nobody would pay to see it.
9/10 for Ines. -1/10 for Natasha "Ain't Nobody Got Time Fo Dat" Schon.
Monday, October 17th, 2016 on Presenting Ines
Please go back to posting Karen K sets at least monthly. She's an elite model. Thank you.
Sunday, October 16th, 2016 on Karen K
Hmmm...how could we ruin a set with one of the best Met Art models and give a huge middle finger to paying customers?
Hey, I know - photograph her in a dark, shadowy shower stall with a Fuji Instashit disposable! Brilliant!
Monday, October 10th, 2016 on Kiosona
Apology accepted. Sapphira is flawless, scar and all.
Saturday, October 1st, 2016 on Harne
If they're going to airbrush away her tattoos, they should do it in all of the pics or none of them. They missed a few. Here I thought Met Art had a little more respect for their models.
Friday, September 23rd, 2016 on Sonora
Those shots ruined it for me. I don't care about the photographer, I care about the model. Take that tacky, self-indulgent crap somewhere else. It's almost as bad as the shots where you see the photographer's load dripping out of the girl.
Monday, September 12th, 2016 on Fortida
Based on some of the comments here, you've got subscribers who would prefer to look at pictures of men.
Saturday, September 10th, 2016 on Karedi
Catherine did the exact same concept with Xena a few weeks ago in a superior photo set. Try on clothes, squat on chair with your backside jutting out until your colon protrudes, etc.
Not that I'm complaining. I love it.
Saturday, August 20th, 2016 on Trebien
I'll never understand the blurry outdoor pics that look like they were taken with a Polaroid instant camera by grandma before her cataract surgery. Image 3 is an abomination because of the turds all over Carinela's right shoe. Sorry, not a good way to open a set.
Saturday, August 13th, 2016 on Kendiu
I haven't been this excited about a duo since Inga C. was doing them. Outstanding work. These two should be front and center on the next ad blitz.
Saturday, May 28th, 2016 on Mimeti
The dream castle needs a little fresh air, chief.
Thursday, May 26th, 2016 on Esmilo
Diana is amazing and the best new model in a while. Weekly sets of her, please!
Tuesday, May 10th, 2016 on Diana Bronce
I wish they would bring this goddess back for a few sets. I don't care if she is 25 lbs. heavier with stretch marks and C-section scars. She'd still be a ten.
Monday, April 11th, 2016 on Adelia A
You're a tad creepy, chief.
Monday, April 11th, 2016 on Shulla
Five years until her second set and it was well worth the wait. I'm going to sleep very well tonight.
Wednesday, March 2nd, 2016 on Marena B
You realize that's some dude's load, right?
Sunday, January 17th, 2016 on Sacher
What do you mean? Her hips are tilted to the right in a couple shots, then tilted to the left in a couple shots, and then there's the shot where she's just as surprised as we are to see that she has an ass.
Combine that with the plain background and we have something that can put men to sleep with a boner. That's rare.
Sunday, July 26th, 2015 on Sinioda
Imagine what these sets will look like once Matiss finds the focus button.
Saturday, July 4th, 2015 on Presenting Margo
Given the potential of all the points you hit on, I found this set to be a major letdown. Especially the later pics. I never thought I'd be bored looking at Dido but Helios has managed to do it.
Thursday, July 2nd, 2015 on Fullate
Wednesday, January 4th, 2017 on Tilane
Melena is why there should be a rating of 100/10.
Monday, December 26th, 2016 on Carnez
Since, in the real-world timeline, we never know when any particular set was shot versus when it's posted, this set _could_ have been shot quite a while ago when it was more common for photographers to edit out such details with PhotoShop before so many complaints arose from members about "excessive" use of such editing tools. Realistically, this could have been shot 3 years ago when she first started appearing here on MetArt. Then too, perhaps it was done at Sapphira's own request. We'll never know. So to ascribe the actions to a photographer saying he doesn't have the "backbone" to leave it in is a bit harsh.
Friday, December 9th, 2016 on Najia
Shazmar, I would suggest that you are absolutely right in preferring to see a story being well told in a photoset. I want to suggest that it's only basic logic that it's much easier to tell a story well in 120 photos than in 80.
When an artist has 120 photos to play with, he can start the model out in a nice outfit and give her the luxury of not just tearing it off as quickly as possible to get to naked. She can tease, she can tantalize, she can play a little bit and still give everyone who likes fully naked photos a full selection of naked poses as well.
In the short sets all too often we see a rush to naked to fulfill that desire. The ability to tell a nice story is sacrificed when the standard is 80 - 90 photos instead of 120.
Wednesday, October 26th, 2016 on Presenting Venice Lei
Let me ask you a simple question. Would YOU consider Pablo Picasso's, vanGogh's, Matisse's or Seurat's work "crummy" or "bad"? It's _different_ for certain, but I wouldn't use the words "crummy" or "bad" in describing it.
And as for Ms. Schon's work coming "... at the expense of the model as well as the paying MetArt subscribers" I honestly can't agree with that. It's only at your "expense" if you choose to download and save her work on your system. Other than that, her work, like photinos and tau muons, is entirely ephemeral and takes no more of your time and effort than your original viewing of it. I'm not sure about you, but I don't download and save each an every set published by MetArt - only the ones I personally choose, for whatever personal reason.
And I'm sure that the "rhesus" comment was meant as hyperbole... at least I hope so.
Again, as mentioned elsewhere to other members, if you already have a decided bent against Ms. Schon's work, don't bother to view it.
I'm tired of the air brushing. I wish it would stop.
Sunday, August 14th, 2016 on Kendiu
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.