Hey, let's introduce a new model, and then conceal her with paint for the entire set!
Monday, March 27th, 2017 on Presenting Tempe
NOW we're talking! After a very frustrating set of another girl, we are treated to a REAL woman who knows how to give her admirers a show!
Friday, March 24th, 2017 on Cannde
Maybe not. Maybe it's just up. Doesn't do it for me this time round. She's very pretty, but very frustrating.
Friday, March 24th, 2017 on Taolmi
Oh my, the famously pussy shy Kira has now cut off her lovely hair.
I believe he's talking about the tiny 80-picture set.
Wednesday, March 22nd, 2017 on Presenting Lola Krit
Yes, it's confirmed, the Giant Necklaces have returned in full force. I guess somebody missed 'em.
Wednesday, March 22nd, 2017 on Rolza
Saturday, March 18th, 2017 on Klacia
Beeg ol' necklace!
Wednesday, March 15th, 2017 on Vellay
Pretty girl, check. Giant Necklace, check. Must be MetArt.
Saturday, March 11th, 2017 on Alardy
Oh man, the stupid necklaces are back with a vengance. Why?
Saturday, March 11th, 2017 on Sembina
Oh my, look at THAT Giant Necklace! You could practically swing off that one.
Wednesday, March 8th, 2017 on Fodel
I see the Giant Necklaces are creeping back into the sets. Yay.
Tuesday, March 7th, 2017 on Tenrita
Oh yeah, nothing turns me on more than a girl with a floral arrangement on her head. Pass.
Monday, March 6th, 2017 on Abieri
I'm in love already! Sheri has an exquisite face, unusual, striking. I hope she has a long career here.
Sunday, March 5th, 2017 on Presenting Shari
Thursday, March 2nd, 2017 on Hunie
I appreciate Paromov's restraint lately, the sets with Lily Sands are fantastic and not so weird as to be a turn off! Great stuff!
Thursday, February 16th, 2017 on Tacoe
Thursday, February 9th, 2017 on Tonne
I would love to see her in a bedroom set.
Saturday, February 4th, 2017 on Linda Chase
Tiny little set of a truly stunning lady.
Sunday, January 29th, 2017 on Tenixo
Gorgeous. I am already looking forward to her next set.
Saturday, January 28th, 2017 on Presenting Kendell
Wow, the set was pretty much over by the time she got her clothes off. I would have loved to have seen another 40 or so pictures.
Wednesday, January 18th, 2017 on Ejana
Not that I want it to become a trend, but I find the balloons better than the Giant Necklaces. I'm glad those aren't featured that much any more. May they never return.
Monday, January 16th, 2017 on Ledeen
Great job, Paromov! Tasteful, erotic, wonderful!
Friday, January 13th, 2017 on Kazune
My favorite on MetArt!
Wednesday, January 4th, 2017 on Cira Nerri
Yay! She's back indoors! Beautiful set of the always gorgeous Candice!
Thursday, December 29th, 2016 on Sontize
Haha, I didn't look at who the photographer was at first, and when I saw the ears, I thought "oh shit, it's a Pamarov set." The difference between Matiss here and Pamarov is that the ears came off.
Wednesday, December 21st, 2016 on Morja
I'd give this set a "12" if I could! Absolute perfection.
Tuesday, December 13th, 2016 on Tilden
She has quickly become one of my absolute favorites!
Wednesday, December 7th, 2016 on Lizean
I'm glad the silly necklace only went on late in the set, and we got some good shots without it.
Wednesday, December 7th, 2016 on Tuliana
Yeah, I infinitely prefer indoor shots, myself. Thumbs up for "concupiscent."
Tuesday, December 6th, 2016 on Traise
Would love to see her do some indoor sets, like in a bedroom.
Sunday, December 4th, 2016 on Juck
At last! I waited all of November for this!
Friday, December 2nd, 2016 on Abrenca
The necklace could have been a wee bit bigger.
Tuesday, November 29th, 2016 on Jinetta
Those words actually mean something? What language are they in?
Sunday, November 27th, 2016 on Oridna
Candice, come back inside! This is 7 outdoor sets in a row! Surely you need to relax in a nice, cozy bed sometime.
Tuesday, November 22nd, 2016 on Brenia
Tuesday, November 22nd, 2016 on Boniu
And thus it begins. Shorter sets=people getting less of what they want. Personally, I enjoy the tease, but I also enjoy large sets where you can get the tease AND the please.
Saturday, November 12th, 2016 on Merwy
I **ADORE** this girl!
Wednesday, November 9th, 2016 on Cira Nerri
Shine on, you crazy diamond. I don't know if I'm risking my membership here by agreeing, but I agree 100%.
Wednesday, November 9th, 2016 on Mabbel
So gorgeous. I'm glad this is a nice, large set, with lots of lovely pictures of this beautiful, beautiful model. A "10" from me!
Saturday, November 5th, 2016 on Meridi
So danged cute, as always!
Friday, November 4th, 2016 on Mathysa
Cool, now the members have requested "Community Guidelines" on top of shorter sets! What will we ask for next?
I should stop reading these comments, it's really making me like this site less and less.
A very happy birthday to a very pretty girl!
/goes back to looking at naked chicks
Thursday, November 3rd, 2016 on Oramie
Well, that was brief!
Wednesday, November 2nd, 2016 on Chenna
You can catch subtle moments like that when you have 120 pix in a set. Would probably be culled out if this was shortened to 80 pix.
Monday, October 31st, 2016 on Miralo
Yeah, who needs 40 more pictures of a gorgeous lady gettin' nekkid for us?
Monday, October 31st, 2016 on Steria
I personally don't have a "lifetime membership," I pay by the month and have been happy to do so, but I am not happy to see the downsizing of the sets at all. If the "lifetime members" have already paid their money, you'd think they'd go about trying to keep those who keep paying month to month happy.
I know I don't write to the comments daily like others here, but I wanted to weigh in and say that I really, REALLY don't like the new "shortened" sets. The longer sets were something I valued with this site, and I feel like the quality of MA has degraded in the past month or two because of this new "standard." Just some random customer's $.02
So, just out of curiosity then, what IS up with the smaller sets?
Wednesday, October 26th, 2016 on Presenting Venice Lei
I can't even picture somebody saying "You know? I think there are too many pictures in each set." What the hell?
Tuesday, October 25th, 2016 on Presenting Venice Lei
And perhaps fewer giant necklaces!
Tuesday, October 11th, 2016 on Yander
Enjoy... it's all yours! haha
Friday, October 7th, 2016 on Phoseta
I love the "ok" tag that shows up on every set on this site.
Friday, October 7th, 2016 on Orinete
Best set of the day!
Thursday, October 6th, 2016 on Telenari
An unusually "normal" set from Paromov! In fact, the only thing vaguely weird in this set is the Obligatory Artistic Giant Necklace, which, to be fair, is a MetArt thing, not a Paromov thing.
Nice job on delivering some fine erotic art here, Paromov--no Dali influence needed!
Sunday, September 25th, 2016 on Protesin
Picture #51 gives us such an amazing view of that giant necklace!
Friday, September 23rd, 2016 on Tesoma
I look forward to her going back indoors someday!
Sunday, September 18th, 2016 on Boniu
I don't think she's met a necklace she didn't like.
Wednesday, September 14th, 2016 on Nika N
This lady really loves her Giant Necklaces.
Wednesday, September 14th, 2016 on Calathe
Y'all know I just love the necklace!
Wednesday, September 7th, 2016 on Harlei
I'm just turned on by the chili pepper variant of the Artistic Giant Necklace! Nothing is more erotic than the thought of crushing one of those bad boys while getting it on with a beautiful woman like Clarice, getting hot pepper juices all over her and you. Mmmm, hot!
Picture #19 is my particular favorite, where you get a real good look at those lovely, lovely peppers. A necklace fetishist's dream!
Saturday, September 3rd, 2016 on Lecion
haha.... you're right about the bunny. I didn't get past the thumbnails, 'cause I could see the set wasn't for me.
Cute girl, cute bunny, still not a turn on! :)
Thursday, September 1st, 2016 on Palarije
You don't need a dwarf on a unicycle holding a fish in the background in order for it to be "art." I personally think the ladies on this site are beautiful, and I truly appreciate that, and most of the sets are erotic and tastefully artistic. I don't care for it--and this is a matter of taste, mind you--when they go over the top with it and hide the girl behind the obligatory Artistic Giant Necklace or do all sorts of weird shadows, or put a Christmas wreath on top of her head. That's just me, again, but when I think "erotic art," I think of beauty that inspires erotic fantasy. Can't say I've ever had a fantasy about a Giant Necklace and a stuffed bunny. Cualy's cute, though-- I'd love to see what a different photographer would do with her.
And don't get me wrong--Paromov is a talented photographer, and I give him (her?) credit for being daring and sticking to his own style, it just doesn't do it for me on the "erotic" side of the erotic art equation.
Wednesday, August 31st, 2016 on Palarije
You know the Giant Necklace fetishists such as myself are happy.
Saturday, August 27th, 2016 on Sceasi
You know I'm happy! Giant Necklace, crazy shadows almost completely obscuring the girl, what's not to like?
The only thing I could see that would make this erotic art even more arty would be a large, distracting hat. Maybe something black and floppy with an ostritch feather.
I see you guys all talking about this Mila Azul, but nobody's mentioned that awesome Giant Necklace! Look at those lovely sea shells!
All that talk of erectile tissue above.... I know I get hard at the thought of getting it on with a beauty such as Mila here, nude, available, willing, getting her hair tangled in the big jangly necklace just at the peak of excitement. Isn't that every man's fantasy?
Saturday, August 27th, 2016 on Erimna
haha, thanx! ;)
Friday, August 26th, 2016 on Poritte
I was really getting off on the sultry black Giant Necklace in this set, when suddenly, from pictures #109-120, IT DISAPPEARED! Where did you go, you hot giant string of black faux glasss? All I see in those last few pictures is some naked chick! Who wants to see THAT on an "erotic art" site?
This was turning out to be an amazing day at MetArt, with two.... count 'em, TWO... Giant Necklaces AND a girl with a topiary on her head, but I may have to dock a point or two off my rating for the pretty girl trying to turn me on with only her spread legs and pretty looks.
Tuesday, August 23rd, 2016 on Mono
While it's no Giant Necklace, I frequently fantasize about a beautiful girl with a Christmas wreath on top of her head. I'm just picturing pulling all the little twigs out of her hair on a lovely summer evening.
Tuesday, August 23rd, 2016 on Ogeta
Oh yeah, all those blue beads, the little knot at the end.... like turquoise pearls or a delightful set of marbles on a string.
Today is a Giant Necklace fetishist's dream! The only complaint I have about this set is that sometimes you'll have a great shot of the necklace, and suddenly, there's a vagina in the way. I have no idea why you do that, it detracts from the erotic thrill we get from looking at a necklace.
Tuesday, August 23rd, 2016 on Poritte
With a necklace like that, she's gonna fit right in.
Monday, August 22nd, 2016 on Presenting Carrie
Oh my, this giant necklace looks like a bunch of cranberries. Or cherry tomatoes. Or something red. I can almost see a girl behind it.
Monday, August 15th, 2016 on Furena
This has been a great day for updates, girls so pretty I almost didn't notice the Giant Necklace in this set! Almost. Guess it wouldn't be MetArt without it.
Thursday, July 28th, 2016 on Imillah
Duh... then I see she's already done one, like, her second to last set... well... MORE PLEASE! ;)
Saturday, July 23rd, 2016 on Emmy
She's so cute! I hope we get some more indoor sets with her, maybe one in a bedroom?
And the realistic, every day clothes. I'm personally not big on the glasses, but that's more than made up for by the girl being dressed like girls normally dress. Fantastic, I'd like to see more of that on MetArt, and less Giant Necklace.
Sunday, July 10th, 2016 on Enotia
Where's the giant necklace? Just kidding. Great job as always, Alex. I wish the other photographers would learn from you!
Oh yeah, give me some Giant Necklace! Look at that sultry mix of white and black. Gives me shivers, oh the contrast!
Thursday, July 7th, 2016 on Tacino
A Giant Necklace fetishist's dream, apparently.
Thursday, July 7th, 2016 on Maslyn
Bravo, AGAIN, for Alex Lynn! My favorite photographer on the site, who understands what sexy is. A beautiful girl in "normal" clothes, in a not-too-outlandish set. No oversized necklace for the girl to drown in. Keep it up, please!
Wednesday, July 6th, 2016 on Smeina
I knew this was an Alex Lynn set immediately. No gigantic jangly necklace, no frilly set, no big bowl of fruit... just a pretty girl, in everyday clothes, in a realistic scenario that gets my imagination going. Erotic as hell.
Tuesday, July 5th, 2016 on Samela
Oh, come on! You're not a Giant Necklace fetishist?
Saturday, July 2nd, 2016 on Tridal
Must be Giant Necklace day again here at MetArt.
Wednesday, June 22nd, 2016 on Rostina
She IS beautiful, and I agree, I hate tattoos. (Which is why I am a big fan of MetArt.) That said, I'm not a big fan of the butterfly, either.
Thursday, May 19th, 2016 on Neiosi
Fruit, coffee, butterflies, giant jangly necklaces. Not a big fan of any of these, I'd prefer to see a beautiful girl (like Caralyn here) in normal clothes peeling 'em off and then getting all erotic. No strawberries or pinwheels needed. I can't say I've ever had a pinwheel or grapefruit fantasy.
The only improvement I could imagine would be to see her clothed for a few shots before she got naked. I'd LOVE to see Jeff in some everyday clothes (NOT 20 necklaces) and then peel 'em off.
Wednesday, May 18th, 2016 on Jeff Milton
I take it back, site is as buggy today as it was yesterday and the night before that.
Sunday, May 15th, 2016 on Condia
Seems resolved now, disregard.
I sure would like to be able to see this set, but the "issues" appear to continue on the site. Two of the new sets look blank to me.
They should take some of those Big Network dollars they're earning and upgrade the infrastructure. Though I think they're having a serious issue this weekend, I've seen delays and such, but not like it's been for the past day.
Saturday, May 14th, 2016 on Moinia
We are well beyond "unacceptable" territory. I was annoyed last night, have gone to sleep since, and have woken up to the problem still not being fixed. I appreciate that they're "working on it" but after they do, they should work on figuring out what caused it, and make sure THAT doesn't happen again.
So far, no good. It's been more than 12 hours since the site's had problems and no fix.
Saturday, May 14th, 2016 on Lerei
I think she could use about 3 more necklaces. Just kidding, can't stand 'em.
Saturday, May 7th, 2016 on Asemel
Now THIS is what I consider "erotic art." There's no need for pretension, just showcase a beautiful woman doing natural stuff.
This is so much more enjoyable than seeing a model wearing 20 necklaces slathering goop all over herself in what looks to be Louis XVI's bedroom. This set evokes fantasy, set like the one I just described evoke confusion more than any erotic desire. (At least in me.)
Keep up the great work!
Tuesday, May 3rd, 2016 on Haloon
Can't stand this set, but the girl is a stunner.
Tuesday, April 26th, 2016 on Jarane
I wish there was a photo set for this one.
Monday, April 25th, 2016 on Budene
This girl really likes apples.
Saturday, April 23rd, 2016 on Onorin
I was thinking that she had a classic comic book heroine face when I saw this. Funny you said similar. I think she's really pretty though, I don't mean it in a bad way.
Monday, March 21st, 2016 on Elamize
Oh yeah, that grape porn is so hot! Oh yeah, they even went for the big, red ones this time! *shudder*
Monday, March 14th, 2016 on Ticaruse
Where did she go?
Wednesday, January 27th, 2016 on Aspen A
I can't complain too much --
I'm just happy to see a "debut" model with a reasonably well-proportioned body and a beautiful face. It's reassuring to see some new talent come on board that I can take an interest in.
This would have been an excellent set if they had resisted the temptation to smear her with paint.
Must confess, I don't see the "fetish" interest. I was never into that sort of thing -- even back in the 60's when it was all the rage.
Or, not knowing just _when_ this was shot, it could very well be an older set when Kira's hair was shorter before she let it grow out. "Current posting" dates have absolutely nothing to do with when the set was actually shot. Some sets shot a couple of _years_ ago are just being posted now.
That damn necklace ruined the set for me.
What value does a prop that distracts and blocks the view add to a photoset?
You should know better Mr. Arkisi who I am also a fan of your work.
Beware of the dog
I know, right? Russians! They have something incredibly, naturally beautiful and they have to make it "ornate...."
Sunday, March 12th, 2017 on Sembina
It's a huge distraction that obscures the view along with the flower pot in the beginning.
IMO props are never a good idea when it comes to presenting the natural beauty of a naked woman's body.
Necklace? What necklace? I was busy lookin' at her other "jewels"! ( - ;
The sarcasm is strong in this one. :)
There appears to be a trend for more and more outdoor sets. Not for the better in my opinion. Combine that with shorter sets and then some of those have poor photography and it's three strikes.
What thetdog said, especially with MetArt's hands-down BEST storyteller and one of his best models. I want to see it all, the tease AND the please. No rush, no stinting on anything.
Sunday, November 13th, 2016 on Merwy
A short while back, a member "who's-name-shall-never-be-mentioned" repeatedly attacked models (for not doing what HE wanted), photographers for his interpretation of their work and technical expertise as well as individual members, using the reasoning that he was exercising his "freedom of speech" and that such actions weren't specifically prohibited anywhere in MetArt's Community Guidelines. Several members, while not supporting him, agreed and voiced the opinion that some sort of "Community Guidelines" be developed and posted so as how all members were expected to act hereabouts.
And you're right, many members turn off the "comments" section entirely.
Actually I remember a while back loads of members were asking for guidelines, so your sarcasm seems a little uncalled for? Seems like they can't win. Whatever they do, someone's gonna bitch about it!
I'm just here for the sexy girls.
That's the "thing" lately, don't'cha know...
I know, right? I mean, it's soooooo harrrrrrrrddddd wading through not only one set of 120 photos of a gorgeous naked lady, but FOUR per DAY!!!
Won't someone PLEASE think of the MEMBERS and shorten the sets to, oh, I don't know, somewhere between 5 - 25 photos? That would make it so much easier and such less torture to sign on to this horrible torture dungeon EVERY SINGLE DAY!!!
Why the heck DO I show up every day anyway? (;
Tuesday, November 1st, 2016 on Steria
Met universe has gone down hill at a rapid pace since they've expanded to such a large family of sites. The servers are lacking consistently and downloads are at a snail's pace here in the U.S. most of the time. Grown too big for the britches as one might say..................
I can... MetArt... when a photographer submits a set of 120-140 photographs, many of which are all-but-identical duplicates with only the small movement of a model's hands, eyes or legs from shot-to-shot. It's called "padding" and it's been done for a long time now on MetArt.
We are no longer insisting that artists provide a higher minimum number of shots, if by doing so they are merely repeating poses with very minimal differences, or including shots they don't particularly like just to make up that number. In other words, giving them the artistic freedom to do a tighter edit which means they can present their best work.
Oh... that's Albert Einstein checking in... you know about his highbrow attitudes.
Quite honestly, an acquired taste. Sometimes, like capers, if they're snuck in in just the right way, they produce a wholly interesting effect. Not that everyone likes capers... many don't, but they _can_ produce an interesting outcome from time to time.
One thing you can always say about a Paromov set... they _never_ look like they were shot in 10 minutes, in a bathroom with a $50 digital pocket camera.
There was a necklace?
Silly! That ain't no stuffed bunny. Or, at least, perhaps she stuffed it with bunny feed before the shoot. Look close and you'll see him interact with her throughout the set. I thought the cutest shot was when she was sitting on the floor leaning back on the chair and the bunny which she'd set on the seat of the chair came up to her and was sniffing her face to make sure she was OK. (:
I see what you did there, thetdog. Bravo!
p.s. This is my nominee for comment of the day. (:
Wednesday, August 24th, 2016 on Poritte
Man, my sarcasm detector is going CRAZY right now.
Point to thetdog!
Tuesday, August 23rd, 2016 on Presenting Carrie
Necklace? There was a necklace in this set?
I hate giant necklace. ;)
Thank you, thetdog!
Monday, July 11th, 2016 on Enotia
Amen to getting rid of 98 % if necklaces. Could you imagine how a huge necklace would distract from those beautiful breasts? What a lovely lady Ryana is!!
You got that right!
thetdog: I will :)
lol. Not even that a photographer (oops, sorry, still image 'artiest') sits on one and chokes on the other??
Wednesday, June 8th, 2016 on Neiosi
Sorry, but I prefer all nude, all the time.
Friday, May 27th, 2016 on Jeff Milton
Most issues should now be resolved, and work is ongoing to make sure everything is fixed. Please see Selena's post on the blog. Apologies, and thanks for bearing with us!
Sunday, May 15th, 2016 on Moinia
The network has simply gotten too big. Since being a member for many years on/off I've noticed slowness in loading of the pages, and downloading of materials site wide depending on traffic...............Crappy? Yes but who ya gonna argue with................
Actually it's been 2 days.
The server has been freezing and extremely slow.
Unfortunately this comment and yours will be deleted by the sensors removing negative comments; as they did in Mila Azul's comments removing a similar long rant two days ago.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.