You don't see many 7-string acoustics around that are that old...
Tuesday, May 16th, 2017 on Fisena
Phenomenal set. I love the lighting, composition and poses, numbers 7 through 54 in general. Image 32 in particular looks like it should be framed in a gallery. I think the artistic impact diminishes somewhat during the set's second half, but that first half is remarkable. Well done.
Saturday, March 18th, 2017 on Lepaan
I'm not seeing anything blurry, are you talking about the 'grainy' appearance?
Looking at the High res images I thought at first it was a compression artifact from saving at too high a compression level, but it certainly seems uniform across any given image. It definitely has the appearance of a Gaussian noise layer from that program. I guess that's to make it look more like film and less 'digital'?
Interesting stylistic choice; it would probably look better in hardcopy (on a wall) than softcopy (on a screen).
Meh, Val's hot pretty much anytime, I'm not complaining.
Sunday, February 5th, 2017 on Nalidu
Heh, sigh, for lack of an edit button. Just to be clear, the first paragraph was obviously about the hair on her head, and the latter about her pubic stubble.
Tuesday, January 17th, 2017 on Senota
You know I hadn't noticed that until you mentioned it Hirundo. Her hair has a lot of subtlety in it that gets lost. Still, I like seeing her anytime.
My favorite in photoshoots is the no hair, lasered-clean look, (which almost no one on this site has, perhaps its not as affordable or stylish elsewhere as it is in the US?) It prevents the stubble look from shaving, but I get that some people like hair so whatever, I still get to see Stefany!
P.S. I'm thinking my preference is probably because I'm old enough to have been in relationships where going down on someone was like being on a safari - you'd need a pith helmet and machete just to get in there. And then you'd be spitting hair for hours. It was disgusting. So no hate, just had enough safaris.
Ugh. If you must, there is an associated site for bush.
Thursday, December 15th, 2016 on Trita
Not to respond to my own comment, but I remembered it being even more tame before '06, and under the 'Archive' button at the top you can go back and look at 2003 era sets, and I think you'd be surprised. Filters are common and often the models aren't entirely disrobed anytime in the set, etc.
So between there and explicit, it's about appreciating the beauty of the female form; the soft curves, the alluring shape, the suggestive impact of the right pose. It's not just zooming in on the naughty bits and 'whackin.
Monday, October 10th, 2016 on Kiosona
I like the artistic slant Alex is going for here, and people seem to be at odds with the content this site is supposed to contain. Is it met ART? Or is it met EXPLICIT?
There's nothing wrong with explicit, but if you go back to the early days, (take a look at some of the 2006-timeframe series), photoshoots with soft filters were not uncommon, and there were sets that weren't explicit at all.
In this set the artistic influence was refreshing, since the whole concept of 'artistic nude' has been largely destroyed by the internet's slide into porn. And then, even in an artistic set, you still got some explicit shots. I don't see what the problem is; there's something for everyone.
(And thankfully not a gross load of pubic hair)
Okay, had to put some flamebait in here somewhere. :)
I'd love to know where in the world this was taken, what a beautiful setting!
Saturday, February 13th, 2016 on Stolety
First, I do love the picture set!
Anyway, I think the comment section is fine, but while we're talking about improvements:
The tag section could use some huge revision. Lots of people seem to not get what tags are for. Every time I see a tag that says 'Lickable [whatever]' I cringe. E.g. "Search by lickable toes!" said no one ever, because that doesn't mean anything! Same goes for 'beautiful [whatever]'.
Tags like "Long toes", "blue eyes", "long labia", "short hair", "wet pussy" all mean something, and therefore, if you click /search one, you know what you're going to get. Met-art should consider deleting any tag entered with a subjective adjective, because the tag lists are sooooo bad. (Or at least blacklist easy words like 'lickable', 'suckable', 'beautiful', 'perfect', etc. in the form input validator. It'd be dead easy)
Okay done with my soapbox.
Tuesday, February 2nd, 2016 on Jordi
Kiss them? Have you never gone down on someone and felt like you needed a pith helmet and machete just to get in there? God that's a style that needs to stay dead with the 1980s.
Friday, January 29th, 2016 on Presenting Sanna
In the words of Adam Corolla, "I hate going down on a woman and feeling like I need a pith helmet and a machete to find my way around!"
Thank God for laser hair removal... never have to worry about my girl deciding to go, "natural" on me later...
Love 'em bald!
Tuesday, July 28th, 2015 on Vefyn
Yeah, some photographers are really into bokeh. Personally I like having a wide enough depth-of-field that the whole model appears to be in focus (or nearly so), giving the viewer a choice of 'subject' on the model.
But some see it as a way of drawing/forcing your attention to one subject ( face, etc). Also, in some cases you're forced to use a really fast lens due to lighting, and some blur is unavoidable. But this is a studio shot where there was full control of the lighting, so... yeah. Not my preferred choice, but I get it.
Saturday, January 17th, 2015 on Macida
So many people suck at tagging; there should be a way to vote to remove tags. Every time I see one starting with 'lickable' it annoys the hell out of me. WTF does 'lickable toes' even mean????
On a totally different note too, I find Eliav totally hot, and that's the reason I was here to even read this rant. :)
Friday, December 12th, 2014 on Subeida
You guys realize you're arguing over a haircut, right?
Wednesday, August 20th, 2014 on Presenting Serena Wood
Wow, just... wow!
Excuse me while I try to regain the power of speech...
Saturday, May 31st, 2014 on Sineun
Wow, very nice set! And I kind of like the extra artsy airbrushing/photoshopping. Part of this whole deal is the fantasy, and why not make it as hot as possible?
And in this case, that's really.... really hot.
Thursday, March 20th, 2014 on Presenting Izabel
Don't have to shave; lasered off long ago. :)
I've been a member of this site for a long time... on and off back to the beginning, and one thing I've never understood is how amazingly awesome the picture sets are, and at the same time, how dull I find the movies.
I really find watching someone just walk around without clothes on to be... at best, anticlimactic. IMHO, the site would be perfect if the videos were sex but in a classy way, kind of like the site that starts with x and ends with the same word this one does. But _they_ ended up opposite - they got the video formula right but not the photo one.
In any case, I wanted to say that I find Valeria extraordinarily beautiful. I forgot all of my met-art video criticisms while watching this. Suddenly I understood how people could just watch someone ... 'be' and play to the camera, and have it be interesting. I would love to see more of her in the future, unitard or not.
So thank you for this!
Wednesday, February 12th, 2014 on Molivi
...or, just don't mind.
Monday, December 2nd, 2013 on Oleje
It might be lasered clean too, that doesn't hurt as much as waxing, and lasts a long time. My girl has one and can't recommend it enough if you like it shaved...
Thursday, November 21st, 2013 on Presenting Patritcy
I dream of a day when those who like furry and those who like clean shaven can live in harmony on the same site... Personally I like lasered clean, but I understand that there are other people who get turned on just as much by the opposite, so I can respect that. How boring would the internet be if we all agreed on everything?
Anyway, it's a beautiful set!
Sunday, November 3rd, 2013 on Eshte
Valeria A is my favorite model on this site - It's always so nice to go to the members page and see an update for her!
Tuesday, September 24th, 2013 on Cordura
You realize that if you just want to see clothed women from head to toe outside you could just, you know, walk down the street, right? ;)
Monday, August 19th, 2013 on Malefni
My comment was intended for fun purposes this time,not going deep into technical issues.
In fact,"blurry" is not the word,but fits well within the fake advertisement.
Could be gaussian noise applied,or simply luminance noise from ISO settings,given Charles´ peculiar workflow,backlit,natural light,no fill light,etc.
I do not find it interesting,just the opposite.I believe it ruins his otherwise fine work and obstructs the view.
If he´s trying to get that analog film effect,he´s clearly a failure,as the effect is far from being attractive or credible.
Oh absolutely, vampire ~ I joined in 2010 and first detoured through the way-way back archives before circling back to the "present" gradually.
Personally, I FAR prefer the "modern" emphasis on the explicit to the old "art nudes" galleries. If I had discovered that that was where the development of MA had ended, I would have ended my subscription there.
Fortunately for me, the site progressed and now I get plenty of very well produced explicit material. Much to my liking. This is head and shoulders above the porn sites I've viewed.
Tuesday, October 11th, 2016 on Kiosona
Both of your comments are spot on. There have always been members who declaim the ANATT and all-explicit-all-the-time (does that make it AEATT?) formats are what they pay for and what they expect. It's very much like the shave/don't shave volleyball game that goes on hereabouts. "I paid for lady bits not art!" "I paid for shaved women not hairy apes!" To use the terms "alluring" and "suggestive" hereabouts is tantamount to waving a cape at a bull. I appreciate the "artsy" side of it. To me it shows that some forethought went into shooting the set rather than the rote by-the-numbers approach some of the ANATT sets espouse.
I gave up on the tags a long time ago. I hide them now. They're just barely on this side of useless.
LOL. Funny comparison, with the machete. But I am not dogmatically bound. I like women with pubic hair, shaved and trimmed. The healthy mix makes it. And I like women with pubic hair, which is often more feminine.
With the 1980's?? Good Lord, how about for all of history until the 90's?
Yes, but it's a *pubic* haircut :-)
To some of us, not very many here, apparently, a woman's bush is a significant part of her sexual appeal. "Primary", I've called it. So when it's offed or severely messed with guys like me are disappointed.
I'd like to be able to see the whole thing before it's disappeared. That in almost every case we cannot here is a major shortcoming in my opinion.
It isn't to you or the vast majority of MA members, but fortunately MA does provide for minority rights, and though there is no doubt a tyranny of the majority here, at least those who beg to differ can do so with equal right :-)
Great I.D. GREATEST 'movie' ever!! And then there's Halle Berry's titties...:o) Yummy!! (Speaking of beautiful women...)the digressor
Swordfish, I like them both. I think that only certain women (a limited number) can do justice to the unshaved look and we know who they are. On any given day the majority of sets (usually all) present shaved or trimmed women. So when the ocassional hairy set appears, I think that those who prefer hairless should quietly move on to the next sets, which will likely be the kind they prefer.
Tuesday, April 8th, 2014 on Eshte
OK, swordfish, you are that 1 in 1,000 I referred to... ( :
Friday, March 21st, 2014 on Presenting Izabel
I haven't looked at much of this set, but to me nothing is hotter than reality -- in this case, "photographic reality."
You may well prefer painting. This site claims to be full of "fine photography" and some of us hold them to that claim, thinking it means featuring images with "photographic quality."
Not normally how we think of paintings.
"Airbrushing/photoshopping" means painting, digitally, in this context. MA claims its photos aren't painted over, but it's not hard to find many that are.
And hopefully you won't ever want it back :-)
I agree swordfish.
I am the opposite. I find a woman walking around without clothes captivating. Nudity is best for me. My preference is for the models to be nude from beginning to end.
Sunday, February 16th, 2014 on Molivi
That's what I mean by "without complaint."
I think mostly it's that they're not aware of it.
Either you're joking or you didn't understand my point. I would like to see the MODEL with clothes, so I can visualize HER as SHE'D appear in public.
Check out Astrud A. "Oiche" or Leila A. "Anelito" (both by Rylsky).....just 2 examples of how I like a set to start.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. All materials © 2017 metart.com. All models photographed were at least 18 years old.